An invasive mussel is in trouble: How do glyphosate, 2,4-D and its mixture affect Limnoperna fortunei's survival?

Polystyrene microplastic alters the redox state and arsenic metabolization in the freshwater bivalve Limnoperna fortunei

Most organisms possess the capacity to metabolize arsenic (As) accumulating compounds to less toxic forms, thus minimizing the adverse effect induced by this metalloid. However, other contaminants may to interfere with As metabolism, contributing to the accumulation of more toxic compounds. Microplastics (MPs) are omnipresent in aquatic environment and may induce toxicological effects (alone or in combination with other contaminants) on living organisms. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of the exposure of the freshwater clam Limnoperna fortunei to a combination of MP (4 and 40 μg/L of polystyrene microbeads, 1.05 μm) and As (50 μg/L) for 48 h, evaluating the accumulation and metabolization of As and oxidative stress parameters, such as catalase (CAT), glutathione-S-transferase activities, total antioxidant competence, reduced glutathione (GSH), and lipid damage in the gills and digestive glands. Results revealed that low MP concentration disrupts the redox state of the digestive gland by a decrease in the antioxidant activity (CAT and total antioxidant capacity). GSH levels in the gills of animals exposed to MP (4 μg/L) alone and the combination of MP + As increased, concomitant with an increase in the percentage of toxic compounds, indicating the effect of MP on As metabolism. Although, few studies evaluated the effect of coexposure to MP + As by considering metabolization of metalloid in freshwater bivalve, our results revealed that exposure to MP reduced the metabolization capacity of As, favoring the accumulation of more toxic compounds besides the MP alone, which showed a pro-oxidant effect in L. fortunei.

Ecosystem services provided by the exotic bivalves Dreissena polymorpha, D. rostriformis bugensis, and Limnoperna fortunei

The ecosystem services approach to conservation is becoming central to environmental policy decision making. While many negative biological invasion-driven impacts on ecosystem structure and functioning have been identified, much less was done to evaluate their ecosystem services. In this paper, we focus on the often-overlooked ecosystem services provided by three notable exotic ecosystem engineering bivalves, the zebra mussel, the quagga mussel, and the golden mussel. One of the most significant benefits of invasive bivalves is water filtration, which results in water purification and changes rates of nutrient cycling, thus mitigating the effects of eutrophication. Mussels are widely used as sentinel organisms for the assessment and biomonitoring of contaminants and pathogens and are consumed by many fishes and birds. Benefits of invasive bivalves are particularly relevant in human-modified ecosystems. We summarize the multiple ecosystem services provided by invasive bivalves and recommend including the economically quantifiable services in the assessments of their economic impacts. We also highlight important ecosystem disservices by exotic bivalves, identify data limitations, and future research directions. This assessment should not be interpreted as a rejection of the fact that invasive mussels have negative impacts, but as an attempt to provide additional information for scientists, managers, and policymakers.