Study of polyacrylamide-surfactant system on the water–oil interface properties and rheological properties for EOR

Optimization of enhanced oil recovery using ASP solution

Many studies have been conducted to focused on developing an optimal alkali/surfactant/polymer (ASP) composition to increase the recovered fraction of oil in reservoirs that have already undergone water injection. To analyze the effect of alkali (Na2CO3), surfactant (lauryl sodium sulfate), and polymer (commercial xanthan gum) concentration on oil recovery, a complete factorial experimental design was performed with combinations of three variables (alkali, surfactant, and polymer) and three central point replications (2³ + 3). The experiments were carried out on a core holder using rock samples from the Botucatu formation. The simulated oil reservoirs have an average permeability of 348 mD and a temperature of 60 °C. The crude oil was acquired from the Carmópolis field, with 25.72 °API. Synthetic production water containing 40,000 mg L-1 of NaCl and 13,000 mg L-1 of Na2SO4 was injected through an HPLC pump to saturate the rock samples and to recover the oil in the secondary step. From the experimental results, it was verified that the surfactant and polymer concentrations are the most statistically significant independent variables and that first-order interactions are not statistically significant for the process. The oil recovery factors in the secondary stage ranged between 30 and 36 % of the OOIP, which are within the range reported in the literature. The optimal composition of the ASP fluid obtained a recovered fraction of oil of 62 % in the advanced step. Other combinations reported in the literature used higher concentrations of alkali, surfactant, and polymer with lower recoveries and higher cost in the injection design. Thus, the present study highlights the necessity to investigate the performance of each component of the ASP solution. In addition, the results obtained in this study are very attractive for possible full-scale applications.

Difference in Step-Wise Production Rules of SP Binary Flooding for Conglomerate Reservoirs with Different Lithologies

The purpose of this study is to clarify the difference in oil production rules of conglomerate reservoirs with different pore structures during surfactant-polymer (SP) binary flooding and to ensure the efficient development of conglomerate reservoirs. In this paper, the full-diameter natural cores from the conglomerate reservoir of the Triassic Kexia Formation in the seventh middle block of the Karamay Oilfield (Xinjiang, China) are selected as the research objects. Two schemes of single constant viscosity (SCV) and echelon viscosity reducing (EVR) are designed to displace oil from three main oil-bearing lithologies, namely fine conglomerate, glutenite, and sandstone. Through comprehensive analysis of parameters, such as oil recovery rate, water content, and injection pressure difference, the influence of lithology on the enhanced oil recovery (EOR) of the EVR scheme is determined, which in turn reveals the differences in the step-wise oil production rules of the three lithologies. The experimental results show that for the three lithological reservoirs, the oil displacement effect of the EVR scheme is better than that of the SCV scheme, and the differences in recovery rates between the two schemes are 9.91% for the fine conglomerate, 6.77% for glutenite, and 6.69% for sandstone. By reducing the molecular weight and viscosity of the SP binary system, the SCV scheme achieves the reconstruction of the pressure field and the redistribution of seepage paths of chemical micelles with different sizes, thus, achieving the step-wise production of crude oil in different scale pore throats and enhancing the overall recovery of the reservoir. The sedimentary environment and diagenesis of the three types of lithologies differ greatly, resulting in diverse microscopic pore structures and differential seepage paths and displace rules of SP binary solutions, ultimately leading to large differences in the enhanced oil recoveries of different lithologies. The fine conglomerate reservoir has the strongest anisotropy, the worst pore throat connectivity, and the lowest water flooding recovery rate. Since the fine conglomerate reservoir has the strongest anisotropy, the worst pore throats connectivity, and the lowest water flooding recovery, the EVR scheme shows a good "water control and oil enhancement" development feature and the best step-wise oil production effect. The oil recovery rate of the two schemes for fine conglomerate shows a difference of 10.14%, followed by 6.36% for glutenite and 5.10% for sandstone. In addition, the EOR of fine conglomerate maintains a high upward trend throughout the chemical flooding, indicating that the swept volume of small pore throats gradually expands and the producing degree of the remaining oil in it gradually increases. Therefore, the fine conglomerate is the most suitable lithology for the SCV scheme among the three lithologies of the conglomerate reservoirs.

Coming to Order: Adsorption and Structure of Nonionic Polymer at the Oil/Water Interface as Influenced by Cationic and Anionic Surfactants

Polymer-surfactant mixtures are versatile chemical systems because of their ability to form a variety of complexes both in bulk solution and at surfaces. The adsorption and structure of polymer-surfactant complexes at the oil/water interface define their use surface chemistry applications. Previous studies have investigated the interactions between charged polyelectrolytes and surfactants; however, a similar level of insight into the interfacial behavior of nonionic polymers in mixed systems is lacking. The study herein uses vibrational sum frequency (VSF) spectroscopy to elucidate the molecular details of nonionic polyacrylamide (PAM) adsorption to the oil/water interface in the presence of surfactant. The polymer's adsorption and conformational structure at the interface is investigated as it interacts with cationic and anionic surfactants. Where the polymer will not adsorb to the interface on its own in solution, the presence of either cationic or anionic surfactant causes favorable adsorption of the polymer to the oil/water interface. VSF spectra indicate that the cationic surfactant interacts with PAM at the interface through charge-dipole interactions to induce conformational ordering of the polymer backbone. However, conformational ordering of polymer is not induced at the interface when anionic surfactant is present.

Role of chemical additives and their rheological properties in enhanced oil recovery

A significant amount of oil (i.e. 60–70%) remains trapped in reservoirs after the conventional primary and secondary methods of oil recovery. Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods are therefore necessary to recover the major fraction of unrecovered trapped oil from reservoirs to meet the present-day energy demands. The chemical EOR method is one of the promising methods where various chemical additives, such as alkalis, surfactants, polymer, and the combination of all alkali–surfactant–polymer (ASP) or surfactant–polymer (SP) solutions, are injected into the reservoir to improve the displacement and sweep efficiency. Every oil field has different conditions, which imposes new challenges toward alternative but more effective EOR techniques. Among such attractive alternative additives are polymeric surfactants, natural surfactants, nanoparticles, and self-assembled polymer systems for EOR. In this paper, water-soluble chemical additives such as alkalis, surfactants, polymer, and ASP or SP solution for chemical EOR are highlighted. This review also discusses the concepts and techniques related to the chemical methods of EOR, and highlights the rheological properties of the chemicals involved in the efficiency of EOR methods.