1
|
Ziranu P, Ferrari PA, Guerrera F, Bertoglio P, Tamburrini A, Pretta A, Lyberis P, Grimaldi G, Lai E, Santoru M, Bardanzellu F, Riva L, Balconi F, Della Beffa E, Dubois M, Pinna-Susnik M, Donisi C, Capozzi E, Pusceddu V, Murenu A, Puzzoni M, Mathieu F, Sarais S, Alzetani A, Luzzi L, Solli P, Paladini P, Ruffini E, Cherchi R, Scartozzi M. Clinical score for colorectal cancer patients with lung-limited metastases undergoing surgical resection: Meta-Lung Score. Lung Cancer 2023; 184:107342. [PMID: 37573705 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2023.107342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2023] [Revised: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radical resection of isolated lung metastases (LM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) is debated. Like Fong's criteria in liver metastases, our study was meant to assign a clinical prognostic score in patients with LM from CRC, aiming for better surgery selection. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data from 260 CRC patients who underwent curative LM resection from December 2002 to January 2022, verifying the impact of different clinicopathological features on the overall survival (OS). RESULTS At the univariate analysis: higher baseline CEA levels (p = 0.0001), disease-free survival less than or equal to 12 months (m) (p = 0.0043), LM size larger than 2 cm (p = 0.0187), multiple resectable nodules (p = 0.0083), and positive nodal status of the primary tumor (p = 0.0011) were associated with worse prognosis. In a Cox regression model, these characteristics retained their independent role for OS (p < 0.0001) and were chosen as criteria to be assigned one point each for clinical risk score. The 5-year survival rate in patients with 0 points was 88%, while no patients with a 5-point score survived at 2 years. Based on the 0-1 vs. 2-5 score range, we obtained a significant difference in median OS: not reached vs. 40.8 months (95 %CI 36 to 87.5), respectively (p < 0.0001) stratifying patients into good and poor prognosis. The prognostic role of the score was also confirmed in terms of median RFS: not reached in 0-1 scored patients vs. 30.5 months (95 %CI 19.4 to 42) in patients with 2-5 scores (p = 0.0006). CONCLUSIONS When LM from CRC is resectable, the Meta-Lung Score provides valuable prognostic information. Indeed, while upfront surgery should be considered in patients with scores of 0 to 1, it should be cautiously suggested in patients with scores of 2 to 5, for whom a prognosis comparison between preventive surgery and other treatments should be investigated in prospective randomized clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pina Ziranu
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Paolo Albino Ferrari
- Division of Thoracic Surgery at "A. Businco Cancer Center", A.R.N.A.S. Brotzu, Cagliari, Italy.
| | - Francesco Guerrera
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Pietro Bertoglio
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessandro Tamburrini
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Andrea Pretta
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Paraskevas Lyberis
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Giulia Grimaldi
- Division of Thoracic Surgery at "A. Businco Cancer Center", A.R.N.A.S. Brotzu, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Eleonora Lai
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Santoru
- Division of Thoracic Surgery at "A. Businco Cancer Center", A.R.N.A.S. Brotzu, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Fabio Bardanzellu
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Laura Riva
- Division of Thoracic Surgery at "A. Businco Cancer Center", A.R.N.A.S. Brotzu, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Francesca Balconi
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Eleonora Della Beffa
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Dubois
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Matteo Pinna-Susnik
- Division of Thoracic Surgery at "A. Businco Cancer Center", A.R.N.A.S. Brotzu, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Clelia Donisi
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Enrico Capozzi
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Valeria Pusceddu
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Alessandro Murenu
- Division of Thoracic Surgery at "A. Businco Cancer Center", A.R.N.A.S. Brotzu, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Marco Puzzoni
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Federico Mathieu
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Department, University Hospital of Siena (Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, AOUS), Siena, Italy
| | - Sabrina Sarais
- Division of Thoracic Surgery at "A. Businco Cancer Center", A.R.N.A.S. Brotzu, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Aiman Alzetani
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Luca Luzzi
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Department, University Hospital of Siena (Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, AOUS), Siena, Italy
| | - Piergiorgio Solli
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Piero Paladini
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Department, University Hospital of Siena (Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, AOUS), Siena, Italy
| | - Enrico Ruffini
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Roberto Cherchi
- Division of Thoracic Surgery at "A. Businco Cancer Center", A.R.N.A.S. Brotzu, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Mario Scartozzi
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Qiao Y, Qiao Y, Li H, Fu J, You S. Survival benefit of primary and metastatic tumor resection for colon cancer with liver metastases: A population based, propensity score-matched study. Front Surg 2022; 9:959826. [PMID: 36111222 PMCID: PMC9468248 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.959826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Colon cancer remains one of the most common malignancies and we aimed to evaluate whether surgery has an effect on the survival of metastatic colon patients. Methods We analyzed 7,583 metastatic colon patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, between January 2010 and December 2015. Using Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier curves, the overall survival rate (OS) and cancer-specific survival rate and End Results (SEER) registry (CSS) months (m) were evaluated with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to adjust for potential baseline confounding of all comparison groups. Results In general, receiving both primary and metastatic tumor resection (PMTR) remarkably improved OS and CSS compared with only primary tumor resection (PTR) after PS matching (PSM) (P < 0.05), with a significantly improved OS (HR = 0.74, 95%CI = 0.69–0.80) and CSS (HR = 0.71, 95%CI = 0.66–0.76) in all stage M1 colon patients. The stratification analysis indicated a significant difference between OS and CSS in M1a and M1b stages. After PSM, PMTR was found to be associated with remarkably improved OS and CSS for patients with liver metastases but not associated with OS and CSS of patients with lung metastases in both M1a and M1b stage. Conclusions The results from this large SEER cohort supported PMTR might improve the survival of colon patients with liver metastases on the basis of chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunfeng Qiao
- First Clinical Medical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
| | - Yunfeng Qiao
- Cancer Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau, Macau, China
| | - Huijun Li
- Department of Imaging Medicine, Taikang Tongji (Wuhan) Hospital, Wuhan, China
| | - Jinge Fu
- Department of Anorectal Surgery, Weishi Central Hospital, Kaifeng, China
| | - Shuping You
- Department of Anus and Bowel Surgery, Jingmen No. 2 People's Hospital, Jingmen, China
- Correspondence: Shuping You
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Huang J, Zang Q, Wen Y, Pan Z, Yao Z, Huang M, Huang J, Chen J, Wang R. Prognostic value of KRAS mutation in patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 160:103308. [PMID: 33753248 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Revised: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of the study was to evaluate whether KRAS mutation could be an independent prognostic biomarker in patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) for colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS A systemic review was performed by searching online databases to identify studies reporting overall survival (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS) of CRC patients undergoing PM. Pooled HRs were calculated for OS and RFS. RESULTS A total of 15233 patients from 60 studies were included. Pooled analysis showed that KRAS mutation was associated with worse OS (HR: 1.86, 95 % Cl: 1.35-2.57) and RFS (HR: 1.68, 95 % Cl: 1.38-2.04). A significant effect on OS and/or RFS was also shown by other 18 factors. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis found that KRAS mutation is an important prognostic predictor for OS and RFS in CRC patients undergoing PM, supporting a comprehensive model including clinicopathological and biological factors for optimal patients selection and prognosis for surgical treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junfeng Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Nanshan School of Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Qing Zang
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Nanshan School of Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yaokai Wen
- Nanshan School of Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhe Pan
- Nanshan School of Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhiyuan Yao
- Nanshan School of Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Mingkai Huang
- Nanshan School of Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jiongqiang Huang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jingsong Chen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
| | - Rongchang Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Long-term outcome after sequential liver and lung metastasectomy is comparable to outcome of isolated liver or lung metastasectomy in colorectal carcinoma. Surg Oncol 2019; 30:22-26. [PMID: 31500780 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2019.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2019] [Revised: 05/01/2019] [Accepted: 05/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Previously, colorectal cancer (CRC) metastasis of both liver and lungs was considered disseminated disease, which contraindicated surgical metastasectomies. Increasing evidence from studies on patient series have indicated that survival improved after resecting both liver and lung metastases. However, those results and long-term outcomes remain controversial. We aimed to compare surgical outcomes between patients treated for both liver and lung metastases to the patients who had only isolated liver or lung metastases. MATERIAL AND METHODS All patients (n = 105) underwent surgery for CRC metastases between July 2002 and September 2015. Three groups were compared: the sequentially operated group (n = 33 patients) underwent sequential liver and lung resections; the liver group (n = 38 patients) underwent liver resections; and the lung group (n = 34 patients) underwent lung resections. The main endpoints were long-term survival rates. RESULTS The groups were not different in disease-free survival (P = 0.727) or overall survival (P = 0.218). Five-year survival rates were 69.7% in the sequentially operated group, 65.1% in the liver group, and 50.0% in the lung group. CONCLUSION Long-term outcomes after sequential liver and lung resections of CRC metastases were comparable to outcomes after isolated liver or lung metastasectomies. Therefore, aggressive surgical interventions should be considered for patients with both liver and lung metastases of CRC.
Collapse
|