Socio-demographic factors related to the prevalence of adverse drug reaction at hospital admission in an elderly population

Predictors of Adverse Drug Reaction-Related Hospitalisations Among People with Dementia: A Retrospective Case-Control Study

INTRODUCTION

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are common among people with dementia; however, little is known about the magnitude and predictors associated with ADR-related hospitalisation among these individuals. This study aimed to determine the magnitude, types, drugs implicated and predictors of ADRs associated with hospitalisation among people with dementia.

METHODS

This retrospective case-control study analysed medical records of individuals aged ≥ 65 years with dementia admitted to major public hospitals in Tasmania, Australia, from July 2010 to July 2021. Adverse drug reactions and implicated drugs were identified using administrative data and cross-checked with hospital medical records, with consensus reached among the research team.

RESULTS

Of the 7928 people admitted to hospital at least once within the study period, 1876 (23.7%) experienced at least one ADR-related hospitalisation. Of these, 300 case patients with 311 ADRs and 300 control patients were randomly selected. The most common types of ADRs were renal (acute kidney injury; AKI) (36.0%), followed by neuropsychiatric (17.6%), cardiovascular (16.0%) and haematological (13.1%). Diuretics, renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors and anti-thrombotics constituted the main implicated drug classes. The ADR-related hospitalisation was associated with: chronic kidney disease (CKD) (OR 8.00, 95% CI 2.63-24.28, p < 0.001), Australian-born (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.08-2.43, p = 0.019), hypertension (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.01-2.17, p = 0.044) and the number of medicines (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.00-1.12, p = 0.022). Potentially inappropriate medication use and anticholinergic burden did not predict ADR-related hospitalisation.

CONCLUSIONS

These predictors could help identify the individuals at the highest risk and enable targeted interventions to be designed.

Kidney Function Decline and Serious Adverse Drug Reactions in Patients With CKD

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The impact of kidney function decline on serious ADR risk has been poorly investigated. We comprehensively describe ADRs and assess the relationship between estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and serious ADR risk.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

3,033 participants in French Chronic Kidney Disease-Renal Epidemiology and Information Network (CKD-REIN) cohort study, a nationwide sample of nephrology outpatients with moderate to advanced CKD.

PREDICTORS

Demographic and biological data (including eGFR), medication prescriptions.

OUTCOME

ADRs (preventable or not) were prospectively identified from hospital discharge reports, medical records, and patient interviews. Expert pharmacologists used validated tools to adjudicate ADRs.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Restricted cubic splines in fully adjusted cause-specific Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the relationship between eGFR and the risk of serious ADRs (overall and by subtype).

RESULTS

During a median follow-up period of 4.7 years, 360 patients experienced 488 serious ADRs. Kidney and urinary disorders (n=170) and hemorrhage (n=170) accounted for 70% of serious ADRs. The most common medications classes were antithrombotics and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors. The majority of those serious ADRs were associated with hospitalization (n=467), with 32 directly or indirectly associated with death and 22 associated with a life-threatening event. More than 27% of the 488 serious ADRs were preventable or potentially preventable. The eGFR is a major risk factor for serious ADRs. The risk of acute kidney injury was 2.2% higher and risk of bleeding ADRs was 8% higher for each 1mL/min/1.73m2 lower baseline eGFR.

LIMITATIONS

The results cannot be extrapolated to patients who are not being treated by a nephrologist.

CONCLUSIONS

ADRs constitute a major cause of hospitalization in CKD patients for whom lower eGFR level is a major risk factor.

PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have complex clinical presentations, take multiple medications, and often receive inappropriate prescriptions. Using data from a large, prospective CKD cohort, we found a high incidence of serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The 2 most common serious ADRs were drug-induced acute kidney injury and bleeding. A large proportion of serious ADRs required hospital admission, and 11% led to death or were life threatening. Lower kidney function was a major risk factor for serious ADRs. Many of these serious ADRs were determined to be partly preventable through greater adherence to prescription guidelines. This report enhances our understanding of the potential toxicity of drugs taken by patients with moderate to advanced CKD. It emphasizes the importance of monitoring kidney function when prescribing drugs, particularly for high-risk medications such as antithrombotic agents.

Risk factors for medication-related short-term readmissions in adults - a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Hospital readmissions due to medication-related problems occur frequently, burdening patients and caregivers emotionally and straining health care systems economically. In times of limited health care resources, interventions to mitigate the risk of medication-related readmissions should be prioritized to patients most likely to benefit. Focusing on general internal medicine patients, this scoping review aims to identify risk factors associated with drug-related 30-day hospital readmissions.

METHODS

We began by searching the Medline, Embase, and CINAHL databases from their inception dates to May 17, 2022 for studies reporting risk factors for 30-day drug-related readmissions. We included all peer-reviewed studies, while excluding literature reviews, conference abstracts, proceeding papers, editorials, and expert opinions. We also conducted backward citation searches of the included articles. Within the final sample, we analyzed the types and frequencies of risk factors mentioned.

RESULTS

After deduplication of the initial search results, 1159 titles and abstracts were screened for full-text adjudication. We read 101 full articles, of which we included 37. Thirteen more were collected via backward citation searches, resulting in a final sample of 50 articles. We identified five risk factor categories: (1) patient characteristics, (2) medication groups, (3) medication therapy problems, (4) adverse drug reactions, and (5) readmission diagnoses. The most commonly mentioned risk factors were polypharmacy, prescribing problems-especially underprescribing and suboptimal drug selection-and adherence issues. Medication groups associated with the highest risk of 30-day readmissions (mostly following adverse drug reactions) were antithrombotic agents, insulin, opioid analgesics, and diuretics. Preventable medication-related readmissions most often reflected prescribing problems and/or adherence issues.

CONCLUSIONS

This study's findings will help care teams prioritize patients for interventions to reduce medication-related hospital readmissions, which should increase patient safety. Further research is needed to analyze surrogate social parameters for the most common drug-related factors and their predictive value regarding medication-related readmissions.

Risk Factors Related to Serious Adverse Drug Reactions Reported through Electronic Submission during Hospitalization in Elderly Patients

Background

Many studies have assessed the risk factors for adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in elderly patients. However, most of these studies have focused on risk factors for ADRs, not serious ADRs (s-ADRs). s-ADRs are commonly found in hospitalized patients. s-ADRs warrant imminent but thorough investigations, given their critical impact on patient health. Therefore, this retrospective study aimed to assess the associated risk factors for s-ADRs in elderly hospitalized patients.

Methods

In-patients aged >65 years having ADRs during hospitalization at a university hospital in Korea between 2010 and 2012 were included. Medical professionals spontaneously reported ADRs using an electronic submission system at the study hospital. Further, all descriptions of ADRs were characterized and categorized through the screening of electronic medical records. We compared the characteristics of patients having s-ADRs with those of patients not having s-ADRs.

Results

There were 353 cases of ADRs, 67 of which were s-ADRs. Patients taking more than eight concomitant drugs showed the highest odds ratio (OR, 11.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.42–42.03). The ratio of aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) was also significantly related to s-ADRs (OR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.33–5.81). The use of antibiotics (OR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.13–5.02) and antineoplastics (OR, 4.17; 95% CI, 1.09–15.94) were significant risk factors.

Conclusion

Our findings highlight the importance of polypharmacy. Liver function tests (AST/ALT ratio) must be monitored carefully within high-risk groups for ADRs.

Predictors of adverse drug reaction-related hospitalisation in Southwest Ethiopia: A prospective cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are important causes of morbidity and mortality in the healthcare system; however, there are no studies reporting on the magnitude and risk factors associated with ADR-related hospitalisation in Ethiopia.

OBJECTIVES

To characterise the reaction types and the drugs implicated in admission to Jimma University Specialized Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia, and to identify risk factors associated with ADR-related hospitalisation.

METHODS

A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted from May 2015 to August 2016 among consenting patients aged ≥18 years consecutively admitted to medical wards taking at least one medication prior to admission. ADR-related hospitalisations were determined through expert review of medical records, laboratory tests, patient interviews and physical observation. ADR causality was assessed by the Naranjo algorithm followed by consensus review with internal medicine specialist. ADR preventability was assessed using Schumock and Thornton's criteria. Only definite and probable ADRs that provoked hospitalisation were considered. Binary logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of ADR-related hospitalisation.

RESULTS

Of 1,001 patients, 103 (10.3%) had ADR-related admissions. Common ADRs responsible for hospitalisation were hepatotoxicity (35, 29.4%) and acute kidney injury (27, 22.7%). The drug classes most frequently implicated were antitubercular agents (45, 25.0%) followed by antivirals (22, 12.2%) and diuretics (19, 10.6%). Independent predictors of ADR-related hospitalisation were body mass index (BMI) <18.5 kg/m2 (adjusted odd ratio [AOR] = 1.69; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.10-2.62; p = 0.047), pre-existing renal disease (AOR = 2.84; 95%CI = 1.38-5.85, p = 0.004), pre-existing liver disease (AOR = 2.61; 95%CI = 1.38-4.96; p = 0.003), number of comorbidities ≥4 (AOR = 2.09; 95%CI = 1.27-3.44; p = 0.004), number of drugs ≥6 (AOR = 2.02; 95%CI = 1.26-3.25; p = 0.004) and history of previous ADRs (AOR = 24.27; 95%CI = 11.29-52.17; p<0.001). Most ADRs (106, 89.1%) were preventable.

CONCLUSIONS

ADRs were a common cause of hospitalisation. The majority of ADRs were preventable, highlighting the need for monitoring and review of patients with lower BMI, ADR history, renal and liver diseases, multiple comorbidities and medications. ADR predictors should be integrated into clinical pathways and pharmacovigilance systems.

The GENDER ATTENTION Observational Study: Gender and Hormonal Status Differences in the Incidence of Adverse Events During Cyclosporine Treatment in Psoriatic Patients

Introduction

Female sex has been shown to be a risk factor for the development of adverse drug reactions; however, this has not been studied for cyclosporine (CsA). The aim of this study was to investigate, in Italian dermatological practice, the influence of gender and menopause and related hormones on the incidence of adverse events (AEs) during CsA treatment in psoriatic patients.

Methods

Multicenter, prospective, observational study conducted from May 2011 to June 2013. Patients with plaque psoriasis, undergoing a new CsA administration course, or about to start it, were enrolled in the outpatient clinics of Italian dermatological centers. During the 2–6 months of study duration, patients had to note all AEs that occurred in a diary that was reviewed by the investigators at the follow-up visit. Sex hormone levels were measured within 7 days from the start date of a menstrual cycle.

Results

A total of 969 adult psoriatic patients were enrolled in the study, divided into four cohorts: fertile women and corresponding age-matched men; postmenopausal women and corresponding age-matched men. A significant difference in the percentage of patients with AEs was observed between fertile and postmenopausal women, but not between women and age-matched men. AE incidence rate was about 37% higher in fertile women than in age-matched men and about 18% higher in postmenopausal women than in age-matched men, but differences were not statistically significant. Incidence rate ratio of fertile vs. postmenopausal women was 0.67, reaching statistical significance. AEs were mild or moderate in severity in the great majority of patients of all cohorts and postmenopausal women had significantly less grade 1–2 AEs compared to fertile women, but more grade 3–4 AEs. FSH levels were significantly higher in postmenopausal women reporting no AEs, and DHEA sulfate levels were about 10% higher in men with no AEs, compared to those reporting at least one AE. Cortisol levels were slightly though significantly higher in postmenopausal women with no AE.

Conclusions

A better understanding of sex- and hormone-related influences on drug responses may help to improve drug safety and efficacy, by permitting one to tailor pharmacological treatments to individual subjects or defined patient cohorts.

Funding

Novartis Farma S.p.A., Italy.

Hospital admissions due to adverse drug reactions in the elderly. A meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

It is currently admitted that adverse drug reactions (ADRs) account for a great burden of disease. Of particular concern are ADR-induced hospital admissions, particularly in the elderly; they receive most of the medications and they are the most prone to develop ADRs. Therefore, our aim was to carry out a study of ADR-induced hospital admissions focused on the elderly population.

METHODS

For the purpose, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed of those studies addressing ADR-induced hospital admissions in patients over 60 years of age. A computerized search of the literature was carried out in the main databases. The search spans from 1988 to 2015. A pooled prevalence figure was calculated with 95% CIs; heterogeneity was also explored.

RESULTS

The final number of selected articles was 42; all of them were published between January 1988 and August 2015. The overall average percentage of hospital admissions was 8.7% (95% CI, 7.6-9.8%). NSAIDs are one of the medication classes more frequently related to these admissions (percentages range from 2.3 to 33.3%). Inappropriate medication as a risk factor was studied in nine studies, four found a statistically significant relationship between those medications and hospital admissions.

CONCLUSIONS

Circa one in ten hospital admissions of older patients are due to ADRs. A great burden of disease is due to a few and identifiable medication classes; in most of the cases, the reactions are well known and probably preventable. A sense of purpose and determination is needed by health authorities to face this problem. Doctors, on their part, should be aware when prescribing some specific identifiable medications to these patients.

KEY POINTS

1. One in ten hospital admissions in older patients are due to ADRs; NSAIDs are the medications the most related with these admissions, followed by other common medications used in patients of this age, such as beta-blockers. 2. A great burden of disease is due to medications that are intended to cure or alleviate disease; this burden of disease is not only painful for the patients but also costly. 3. Identified risk factors are particular medication classes and polymedication. In most of the cases, reactions are probably preventable.

[Not Available]

AIM

To describe the serious adverse drug reactions (ADR) in elderly subjects aged over 65 years and assess their preventability.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted at the Regional Pharmacovigilance Center of Champagne-Ardenne (northeast of France) between January and May 2013. Patients aged over 65 years who presented a serious ADR notified to the Regional Pharmacovigilance Center were included in the study.

RESULTS

Over the study period, 100 subjects were included in the study. The sex ratio was 0.96. Twenty seven percent of serious ADR were preventable. Off-label use accounted for 20% and non-compliance for 5%. Bleeding events were the most common serious ADR (36%). The drugs most frequently involved in serious ADR were antithrombotic agents (31.4%).

CONCLUSION

More than a quarter of serious ADR were preventable. Off-label use and non-compliance are the main causes identified in the occurrence of preventable serious ADR.

Number of drugs most frequently found to be independent risk factors for serious adverse reactions: a systematic literature review

In order to reduce the numbers of medication errors (MEs) that cause adverse reactions (ARs) many authors have tried to identify patient-related risk factors. However, the evidence remains controversial. The aim was to review systematically the evidence on the relationship between patient-related risk factors and the risk of serious ARs. A systematic search in Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Systematic Reviews, Psychinfo and SweMed+ was performed. Included full text articles were hand searched for further references. Peer reviewed papers including adults from primary and secondary healthcare were included if they clearly defined seriousness of the ARs and described correlations to risk factors by statistical analysis. A total of 28 studies were identified including 85,212 patients with 3385 serious ARs, resulting in an overall frequency of serious ARs in 4% of patients. Age, gender and number of drugs were by far the most frequently investigated risk factors. The total number of drugs was the most consistent correlated risk factor found in both univariate and multivariate analyses. The number of drugs is the most frequently documented independent patient-related risk factor for serious ARs in both the general adult population as well as in the elderly. The existing evidence is however conflicting due to heterogeneity of populations and study methods. The knowledge of patient-related risk factors for experiencing ARs could be used for electronic risk stratification of patients and thereby allocation of healthcare resources to high risk patients.

Possible adverse drug events leading to hospital admission in a Brazilian teaching hospital

OBJECTIVES

Drug safety problems can lead to hospital admission. In Brazil, the prevalence of hospitalization due to adverse drug events is unknown. This study aims to estimate the prevalence of hospitalization due to adverse drug events and to identify the drugs, the adverse drug events, and the risk factors associated with hospital admissions.

METHOD

A cross-sectional study was performed in the internal medicine ward of a teaching hospital in São Paulo State, Brazil, from August to December 2008. All patients aged ≥18 years with a length of stay ≥24 hours were interviewed about the drugs used prior to hospital admission and their symptoms/complaints/causes of hospitalization.

RESULTS

In total, 248 patients were considered eligible. The prevalence of hospitalization due to potential adverse drug events in the ward was 46.4%. Overprescribed drugs and those indicated for prophylactic treatments were frequently associated with possible adverse drug events. Frequently reported symptoms were breathlessness (15.2%), fatigue (12.3%), and chest pain (9.0%). Polypharmacy was a risk factor for the occurrence of possible adverse drug events.

CONCLUSION

Possible adverse drug events led to hospitalization in a high-complexity hospital, mainly in polymedicated patients. The clinical outcomes of adverse drug events are nonspecific, which delays treatment, hinders causality analysis, and contributes to the underreporting of cases.

Prevalence, risk factors and main features of adverse drug reactions leading to hospital admission

PURPOSE

To assess the prevalence of hospital admission related to adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in a third-level hospital, to analyse the associated factors, and to describe the reactions and the drugs involved.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted for a 120-day period. Patients that were urgently hospitalized entered the study. The primary endpoint was the ADR-related urgent admission. A descriptive analysis of demographic, clinical, and drug-related variables was performed. The association between the likelihood of urgent admission due to ADRs and age, gender, and number of drugs used was analysed. A descriptive analysis of the suspected drugs and the reactions in ADR-related admissions was performed.

RESULTS

Overall, 186 out of 4,403 hospital admissions were due to ADRs (prevalence: 4.2 % [95 % CI 3.7-4.8 %]). Age (≥65 years: OR 1.59 [95 % CI 1.10-2.29]) and number of drugs used at the time of admission (3-5 drugs: OR 5.07 [95 % CI 2.71-9.59]; 6-9 drugs: OR 5.90 [95 % CI 3.16-11.0]; ≥10 drugs: OR 8.94 [95 % CI 4.73-16.89]), but not gender, were identified as independent factors associated with ADR-related hospitalization. The overall in-hospital stay for patients admitted with ADRs amounted to 1,785 days. The ADRs were mainly type A reactions (92 %). Acute renal failure related to renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, haemorrhage due to anticoagulants, and upper gastrointestinal bleeding related to antiplatelet drugs and/or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were the most frequent.

CONCLUSION

Over 4 % of urgent hospitalizations are caused by ADRs, which are dose-related and predictable in more than 90 % of cases. The main risk factors are advanced age and polypharmacy.

Sex and gender in adverse drug events, addiction, and placebo

Sex-gender-based differences in response to pharmaceutical treatments are still under evaluation but evidence already exists regarding the impact of sex-gender-related differences on drug safety profile, drug abuse/addiction, and placebo effects. For a number of drugs it is well recognized that a sex-gender dimorphic profile in terms of drug adverse effects exists and appears to be more frequent and severe in women than in men. However, it is not well known whether this is due to pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic differences. Indeed the optimization of therapy requires that attention is paid to single sex-gender. Numerous pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and sociocultural differences between women and men in drug abuse have been described. Here we focus on sex-gender differences in alcoholism and nicotine addiction. The relevance of sex and gender differences in addiction appear to be relevant. Specific programs aimed to address addicted women's specific needs (child care, pregnancy, housing, and violence and others) are recommended. Finally, this article discusses the possible effect of sex-gender on placebo response in the light of the more significant recent literature evidencing that studies are urgently required in order to better understand the role of sex-gender on placebo mechanism and its impact on randomized clinical trials outcomes.

Risk factors associated with adverse drug reactions in hospitalised children: international multicentre study

BACKGROUND

Understanding the epidemiology and risk factors of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) is important in order to develop appropriate prevention strategies. This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with ADRs in hospitalised children and recommend strategies to minimise ADRs.

METHODS

A prospective multicentre cohort study was conducted on paediatric general medical wards in five European and non-European hospitals. ADRs were identified by intensive chart review. Multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate risk factors associated with ADRs. For the risk factor analysis, prescribed drugs were divided into high-risk and low-risk drug groups. Analgesics, anti-epileptics, antibacterials and antimycotics for systemic use, corticosteroids for systemic use and immunosuppressant agents were considered as high-risk groups whereas the remaining drug classes were defined as low-risk drug groups.

RESULTS

A total of 1,253 paediatric patients were identified [Australia (n = 145), Germany (n = 372), Hong Kong (n = 138), Malaysia (n = 291), UK (n = 307)]. A total of 328 ADRs were observed in 16.7% of patients (186/1,115). Use of five or more low-risk drugs per patient or three or more high-risk drugs was a strong predictor for ADRs (OR 4.7, 95% CI 2.4-9.3; OR 6.5, 95% CI 2.7-16.0 respectively; p < 0.001). Older children were more likely to experience ADRs; gender was not significantly associated.

CONCLUSION

To reduce the risk of ADRs in children, clinicians and pharmacists should aim to minimise polypharmacy and be aware of higher ADR risks associated with some drug groups.

Detection of adverse drug reactions through the minimum basic data set

OBJECTIVE

To analyze adverse drug reaction (ADR) detection using the Minimum Basic Data Set (MBDS) at hospital discharge and to compare the ADR reporting rate to the Pharmacovigilance Referral Centre with other similar hospitals that do not use this reporting system. Setting 650-bed University Hospital serving a population of 294,000 inhabitants in Spain.

METHOD

A retrospective descriptive study was conducted between January 2006 and December 2007. All reports of ADRs gathered in MBDS (a tool that encodes all administrative and clinical information generated for each patient during a hospitalization episode) with International Classification Disease codes between E930 and E949.9 were analyzed to assess the appropriateness of their referral to the pharmacovigilance centre. Finally, we compared our reporting rate with other hospitals that do not use this system for ADR identification.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The incidence of ADRs detected in hospitalized patients and the reporting rate (per thousand inhabitants) to the referral pharmacovigilance centre using the Yellow Card system.

RESULTS

Out of 43,282 hospital discharges, 386 ADR were recorded (0.89% of hospitalized patients). The mean (+/-SD) age of patients with reported ADR was 61.9 years (+/-19.2), median age was 65 years, and 55.2% were female. The Department of Pharmacy reported 276 (71.5%) of ADR using the Yellow Card system. The most frequently reported drugs were anti-cancer agents (42.5%) and cardiovascular drugs (23.8%), with a high frequency of digitalis glycosides (18.4%). ADR were most frequently recorded by the Departments of Oncology (41.7%) and Internal Medicine (17.9%).

CONCLUSION

The MBDS is a useful and accessible instrument to determine the incidence of ADR in a hospital, resulting in the notification of severe events that might otherwise not be reported. Its use also improves identification of the main drugs responsible for ADR and of the patient populations at greatest risk, facilitating the implementation of alert systems and the development of prevention and detection strategies.

[Adverse drug events in hospitalized elderly patients in a geriatric medicine unit: study of prevalence and risk factors]

INTRODUCTION

In the elderly, both the presence of a multiple pathology and multiple medication have been shown to be frequent risk factors for adverse drug events. However, a few studies only have included parameters of standardized geriatric assessment for the purpose of identifying other risk factors. Our study compared the parameters of standard geriatric assessment, in the presence or absence of adverse drug events and evaluated the prevalence of adverse drug events in elderly inpatients, the symptoms, and the drugs involved.

METHODS

A total of 823 patients were studied during a two-year period. Two groups of patients were identified, according to the presence or absence of an adverse drug event. Eight fields of geriatric assessment were compared: comorbidities, number of drugs, functional status, nutritional status, mobility, mood, neurosensory disorders, and cognition. For patients who experienced an adverse drug event, we also analyzed the drugs involved and the symptoms of the adverse drug events.

RESULTS

One hundred and twelve patients (13.6%) aged 82 years+/-7.5 experienced 144 adverse drug events. Significant differences between the two groups were observed in the following: symptoms of depression, problems of mobility, risk of malnutrition (respectively p=0.001, p=0.002, p=0.007), the female sex, number of drugs, number of comorbidities, and the administration of diuretics. Cardiovascular (23.2%), psychotropic (17.9%) and anti-infectious (17%) medicines were the most frequently involved. The symptoms that occurred most frequently were orthostatic hypotension (14.6%), gastrointestinal disorders (12.5%), and neuropsychological (10.4%) disorders.

CONCLUSION

Elderly patients with multiple pathology and multiple medication are at high risk for adverse drug events. Other lesser known factors, such as depression, problems of mobility, and malnutrition must be researched, as they are evidence of the underlying the frailty of the elderly population.

Contribuição do uso de medicamentos para a admissão hospitalar

As Reações Adversas a Medicamentos (RAM) podem ser responsáveis por 2,4% a 11,5% das admissões hospitalares. O estudo objetivou conhecer o perfil demográfico dos pacientes internados por possíveis RAM, identificar os medicamentos e as queixas mais freqüentemente relacionadas e estimar a incidência de admissão hospitalar pelo uso de medicamentos. Durante um mês, os pacientes internados em um hospital geral foram entrevistados quanto ao uso de medicamentos antes da internação e as queixas que o levaram ao hospital; as informações foram analisadas, usando-se a base de dados MICROMEDEX® e outras bases oficiais. Observou-se que as admissões por uso de medicamentos ocorreram predominantemente em idosos [47,5% (66/139)] e mulheres [62% (87/139)]. Os medicamentos mais freqüentes foram: omeprazol (16), analgésicos (31), antihipertensivos (31), sinvastatina (7) e formoterol (6); e normalmente os sintomas associados foram do sistema digestório (20,5%), circulatório (20,2%), respiratório (18,2%) e SNC (13,9%). Estima-se que em 15,5% (139/897) das internações, possivelmente, a razão foi o uso de medicamentos. Os dados sugerem medidas de prevenção, como o acompanhamento farmacoterapêutico dos pacientes no âmbito da assistência primária à saúde, principalmente aos idosos, aos portadores de doenças crônicas e aos polimedicados, além da orientação farmacêutica na compra e dispensação de medicamentos, principalmente os isentos de prescrição.

Women encounter ADRs more often than do men

BACKGROUND

Several publications indicate that the female gender experiences a higher incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) than does the male gender. The reasons, however, remain unclear. Gender-specific differences in the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic behaviour of drugs could not be identified as an explanation. The aim of this study was to analyse ADR risk with respect to gender, age and number of prescribed drugs.

METHODS

A prospective multicenter study based on intensive pharmacovigilance was conducted. Information on patient characteristics and evaluated ADRs was stored in a pharmacovigilance database--KLASSE.

RESULTS

In 2,371 patients (1,012 female subjects), 25,532 drugs were prescribed. In 782 patients, at least one ADR was found. A multivariate regression analysis adjusting for age, body mass index (BMI) and number of prescribed drugs showed a significant influence of female gender on the risk of encountering ADRs [odds ratio (OR) 1.596, confidence interval (CI) 1.31-1.94; p < 0.0001). Dose-related ADRs (51.8%) were the dominant type in female subjects. Comparing system organ classes of the World Health Organisation (SOC-WHO), cardiovascular (CV) ADRs were particularly frequent in female subjects (OR 1.92, CI 1.15-3.19; p = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

Our data confirm the higher risk of ADRs among female subjects compared with a male cohort. Several explanations were investigated. No single risk factor could be identified.

Adverse drug reactions related to hospital admission in Slovak elderly patients

The aims of the present study were: to evaluate the prevalence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) leading to hospitalization in elderly patients; to analyze the drugs which have been identified as having causal relationship with ADRs and to identify risk factors which predispose the patient to such ADRs. The study has been performed in 600 patients aged> or =65 years, hospitalized in a general hospital between 1 December 2003 and 31 March 2005. The ADRs recorded in patient's documentation as one of the reasons for hospital admission were evaluated. ADRs leading to hospital admission were recorded in 47 (7.8%) patients. ADRs in 43 patients represented A-type ADRs which are preventable. The most frequent ADRs were cardiovascular disorders. According to the results of multivariate analysis ischemic heart disease (odds ratio (OR)=4.50; 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.36-14.88), depression (OR, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.08-5.77) and heart failure (OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.13-3.81) were the most important patient-related characteristics predicting ADRs leading to hospitalization. The majority of ADRs in elderly patients could be avoided. Regular re-evaluation of the medication as well as taking into account the specific features of elderly patients represent the most important tools for ADR prevention.

Idiosyncratic toxicity: a convergence of risk factors

The therapeutic margin for any drug is based on both toxicity and efficacy. Generally, toxicity is dose-dependent and is driven either by the therapeutic target or by an untoward target. However, idiosyncratic toxicities are usually not observed until a drug has been on the market and has gained broad exposure. Except in the case of pharmacokinetic interactions, these toxicities are not driven solely by drug exposure but rather depend on several drug- and patient-related risk factors. Drug-related risk factors include metabolism, bioactivation and covalent binding, and the inhibition of key cell functions. Patient-related risk factors include underlying disease, age, gender, comedications, nutritional status, activation of the innate immune system, physical activity, and genetic predispositions. Idiosyncratic toxicity can occur when a convergence of risk factors, including drug exposure, tips the risk-benefit balance away from benefit and toward risk.

Implementation of an electronic system for medication reconciliation

PURPOSE

The feasibility of implementing an electronic system for targeted pharmacist- and nurse-conducted admission and discharge medication reconciliation and its effects on patient safety, cost, and satisfaction among providers and nurses were studied.

METHODS

This study was conducted in two phases: a preimplementation phase and a postimplementation phase. In the preimplementation phase, admission medication histories and discharge medication counseling followed standard care processes. During postimplementation, pharmacists and nurses collaborated to electronically complete admission and discharge medication reconciliation documentation. Four reports were developed for medication reconciliation documentation: (1) home medication profile report, (2) home medication reconciliation report, (3) discharge medication reconciliation report, and (4) patient discharge medication report. Patients were contacted after discharge to measure their satisfaction with the medication counseling and medication instructions received. Health care providers completed a survey indicating their satisfaction with the electronic medication reconciliation processes.

RESULTS

A total of 283 patients were included in the study. Patients in the postimplementation group took significantly more prescription and nonprescription medications, and their total number of medications significantly exceeded the number taken by the preimplementation group. Pharmacists completed significantly more dosage changes in the postimplementation phase than in the preimplementation phase. In the preimplementation phase, nurses identified more incomplete medication orders, dosage changes, and allergies than they did in the postimplementation phase. Patients in the postimplementation group reported a higher level of agreement on all survey items regarding adequate discharge medication instructions.

CONCLUSION

Patients who had their medications electronically reconciled reported a greater understanding of the medications they were to take after discharge from the hospital, including medication administration instructions and potential adverse effects.

Drug dosage in the elderly: dermatological drugs

Drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics may be altered in the elderly. An important contribution is made by decreased renal function, but biotransformation in the liver may also play a role. Commonly prescribed dermatological drugs such as methotrexate and cetirizine are likely to be eliminated more slowly in the elderly and potentially hepatotoxic drugs such as itraconazole and acitretin should be used with caution. Altered drug distribution as a result of body composition changes can lead to prolonged half-life or higher plasma concentrations of many drugs. Higher prevalence of adverse drug reactions and multidrug regimens, and large interindividual variability in drug response make drug dosage and administration in the elderly challenging. New immunobiological agents such as alefacept, efalizumab and etanercept, which are approved for treatment of psoriasis, seem to be as well tolerated in the elderly as in younger patients. A recommended approach when prescribing drugs to the elderly would be to start with a small initial dose and to reduce the number of drugs administered simultaneously. It is crucial to simplify the drug regimen as much as possible in order to enhance drug management in the elderly. To improve pharmacotherapy in the elderly, we review age-related changes in pharmacokinetics that are likely to play a role in dermatological practice.