Opinion on opinions about geriatric assessment

[Geriatric assessment tools in Spanish Geriatric Departments]

INTRODUCTION

Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is the main measurement tool used by Geriatricians. A 2000 survey demonstrated great variability in the tools used for CGA among Spanish Geriatric Departments. A new survey to detect 13-year trends in the use of CGA tools in our country is presented.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Descriptive study using a structured questionnaire on the use of CGA tools in different levels of care sent to the Heads of 39 Spanish Geriatric Departments or Services (27 with postgraduate teaching in Geriatrics) during the first three months of 2013.

RESULTS

The response rate was 97.4%. It was found that 78.4% (29 centers) used different tools depending on the level of care. Barthel and Lawton index were the most used functional assessment tools in all Departments and across all geriatric levels, although gait speed and Tinetti scale were frequently used in Day Hospital and Outpatient clinics. The Mini Mental State Exam and its Spanish version Mini Examen Cognoscitivo were the most used mental scales (97.4%), followed by tools for assessing depression-behavior (86.8%) and severity of cognitive impairment tools (84.2%). CGA tools were used in 43.2% of the emergency departments of the hospitals surveyed, being the most frequent. More than two-thirds (69.4%) of the Departments reported that their affiliated Primary Care centers used CGA tools, with the Barthel and Lawton again being indexes the most used. Most of the responding Departments considered that the main domains of CGA are functional, mental and social status. Nutrition, comorbidity, falls and pressure ulcers are other important domains.

CONCLUSIONS

There is still a great variability in the CGA tools being used in Spanish Geriatric Departments, although there is a trend towards a greater use of Barthel index, greater adaptation of tools to each level of care, and increasing assessment of new domains like frailty, nutrition or comorbidity.

[Standardized geriatric assessment or comprehensive gerontological assessment: where do we stand?]

The concept of comprehensive gerontological assessment is a foundation of modern geriatrics. Our focus was to try to clarify the underlying concepts, assess the level of evidence and clarify the issues still under debate. The concept implies the definition of an interdisciplinary process for a multidimensional assessment in order to produce a coordinated plan. The central notion is that the systematization of this multidimensionality and interdisciplinarity needs the establishment of dedicated process (meeting tools, clinical information system, etc.). Following dimensions should be covered: health, social, economic, environmental and psychological. Any assessment process that could lead to forgetting one of its dimensions cannot be viewed as a comprehensive gerontological assessment. The level of evidence is higher in hospital acute inpatient unit but it is still low in all other areas of health care but the scattered data in the literature argues for qualitative benefits (improved quality of care or quality of life). The questions that remain are numerous including the choice of strategy for initial evaluation (maximum versus minimum; from the outset by many professionals versus graduated based on the minimum initial evaluation), the choice of tool, the optimal location, the required intensity of monitoring and the ideal target population.