Modulation operated by the sympathetic nervous system on jaw reflexes and masticatory movement

α1 adrenergic receptor activation has a dynamic effect on masticatory muscle afferent fibers

Temporomandibular Disorder (TMD) patients report amplification of pain in the masticatory muscles after psychological trauma or stressful conditions. The mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are yet to be elucidated. This study combined immunohistochemistry with single cell in vivo electrophysiology recordings of masticatory muscle afferent fibers to investigate the role of α₁-adrenergic receptors in muscle nociception. It was found that a subset of trigeminal afferent fibers which innervate the masseter and temporal muscles expressed α_1a, α_1b and α_1d receptors, including a smaller number of putative nociceptors which co-expressed TrpV₁ receptors. Local injection of the selective α₁ adrenergic receptor agonist phenylephrine into masticatory muscle decreased and increased the mechanical activation threshold of slow and fast conducting afferent fibers, respectively. This effect was reversed by co-administration of the α₁ selective antagonist terazosin. To rule out the possibility that local ischemia was responsible for the observed effect of phenylephrine on masticatory muscle afferent fibers, additional experiments were conducted where blood flow to the masticatory muscle was reduced by common carotid artery occlusion. This investigation found that muscle blood flow occlusion increased the mechanical activation threshold of the majority of masticatory muscle afferent fibers unrelated to conduction velocity. These findings suggest that under conditions of increased sympathetic tone, such as those related to stress, noradrenaline may sensitize masticatory muscle nociceptors to increase pain and desensitize muscle proprioceptors to alter muscle tone, through activation of α₁ receptors.

Force-induced Adrb2 in periodontal ligament cells promotes tooth movement

The sympathetic nervous system (SNS) regulates bone resorption through β-2 adrenergic receptor (Adrb2). In orthodontic tooth movement (OTM), mechanical force induces and regulates alveolar bone remodeling. Compressive force-associated osteoclast differentiation and alveolar bone resorption are the rate-limiting steps of tooth movement. However, whether mechanical force can activate Adrb2 and thus contribute to OTM remains unknown. In this study, orthodontic nickel-titanium springs were applied to the upper first molars of rats and Adrb1/2(-/-) mice to confirm the role of SNS and Adrb2 in OTM. The results showed that blockage of SNS activity in the jawbones of rats by means of superior cervical ganglion ectomy reduced OTM distance from 860 to 540 μm after 14 d of force application. In addition, the injection of nonselective Adrb2 agonist isoproterenol activated the downstream signaling of SNS to accelerate OTM from 300 to 540 μm after 7 d of force application. Adrb1/2(-/-) mice showed significantly reduced OTM distance (19.5 μm) compared with the wild-type mice (107.6 μm) after 7 d of force application. Histopathologic analysis showed that the number of Adrb2-positive cells increased in the compressive region of periodontal ligament after orthodontic force was applied on rats. Mechanistically, mechanical compressive force upregulated Adrb2 expression in primary-cultured human periodontal ligament cells (PDLCs) through the elevation of intracellular Ca(2+) concentration. Activation of Adrb2 in PDLCs increased the RANKL/OPG ratio and promoted the peripheral blood mononuclear cell differentiation to osteoclasts in the cocultured system. Upregulation of Adrb2 in PDLCs promoted osteoclastogenesis, which accelerated OTM through Adrb2-enhanced bone resorption. In summary, this study suggests that mechanical force-induced Adrb2 activation in PDLCs contributes to SNS-regulated OTM.

Effects of intervertebral disc disorders of low back on the mandibular kinematic: kinesiographic study

Background

Intervertebral disc disorders are one of the most common causes of low back pain. Neuromuscular dysfunction frequently is present in patients with lumbar disc herniation.

When considering joint dysfunction, it is important to remember that the spine functions as a unit. Dysfunction on one level can trigger compensatory changes in other spinal levels or in other areas of the musculoskeleton. Findings demonstrated the relationship between stomatognathic and postural systems justifying the hypothesis that muscular-skeletal impairment in one system could affect the other one. However, evidence that a lumbar intervertebral disc herniation could influence the mandibular kinematics is still lacking. Aim of this study was to analyse the effects that intervertebral disc herniation of low back could have on the mandibular kinematics.

Findings

Kinesiographic evaluations of the mandibular dynamics of 23 adult patients suffering L4/L5 and L5/S1 lumbosacral disc hernation were compared with a non pathological control group. A statistically significant difference of maximal mouth opening (p < .05) and of maximal mouth opening velocity (p < .03) was found comparing the study patients with the control subjects.

Conclusion

Lumbosacral disc herniation appears to be associated with changes in the activity of mandibular kinematics both in rate and quality of movement. The study suggests the existence of connections between masticatory system and lumbar disk herniation.

Dysregulation of the autonomous nervous system in patients with temporomandibular disorder: a pupillometric study

The role of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) was recently investigated in Temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Several authors argue that in subjects with TMD there is a dysregulation of ANS. Recent literature support that Pupillometry is a simple non-invasive tool to study ANS. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between TMD and ANS activity using pupillometry recording in Infrared light at rest Mandible Position (RP); Infrared light at Forced Habitual Occlusion (FHO); Yellow-green light at RP; Yellow-green light at FHO. Forty female subjects were enrolled: 20 case patients showed TMD based on the Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD, and 20 control patients, aged matched, had no signs or symptoms of TMD. Statistical analysis was performed on average pupil size. Ratio between pupil size in FHO and RP (FHO/RP ratio) and yellow-green and infrared (light/darkness ratio) lighting were carried out. Within group differences of pupil size and of “ratio” were analyzed using a paired t test, while differences of pupil size between groups were tested using an unpaired t test. Statistical comparisons between groups showed no significant differences of absolute values of pupil dimension in RP and FHO, both in yellow-green and in infrared lighting. In addition, there were no significant differences within groups comparing RP and FHO in yellow-green light. In within group comparison of pupil size, differences between RP and FHO were significant in infrared conditions. Control subjects increased, whereas TMD patients decreased pupil size at FHO in infrared lightening. FHO/RP ratio in darkness and light/darkness ratio in RP were significantly different between groups. Taken together, these data suggest that TMD subjects have an impairment of the sympathetic-adrenergic component of the ANS to be activated under stress. The present study provides preliminary pupillometric data confirming that adrenergic function is dysregulated in patients with TMD.

Pathophysiology of TMD pain--basic mechanisms and their implications for pharmacotherapy

This article discusses the pathophysiology of temporomandibular disorders (TMD)-related pain and its treatment with analgesic drugs. Temporomandibular disorders are comprised of a group of conditions that result in temporomandibular joint pain (arthralgia, arthritis) and/or masticatory muscle pain (myofascial TMD). In at least some patients with TMD, a peripheral mechanism contributes to this pain. However, there is often a poor correlation between the severity of TMD-related pain complaints and evidence of definitive tissue pathology. This has led to the concept that pain in some patients with TMD may result from altered central nervous system pain processing and further that this altered pain processing may be attributable to specific genes that are heritable. Psychosocial stressors are also thought to contribute to the development of TMD-related pain, particularly masticatory muscle pain. Finally, substantially more women suffer from TMD than men. Although there are arguably multiple reasons for sex-related differences in the prevalence of TMD, one candidate for the increased occurrence of this disorder in women has been suggested to be the female sex hormone oestrogen. Analgesic drugs are an integral part of the primary treatment for TMD-related pain and dysfunction with more that 90% of treatment recommendations involving use of medications. The most commonly used agents include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, muscle relaxants, anxiolytics, opiates and tricyclic antidepressants, however, evidence in support of the effectiveness of these drugs is lacking. Continued research into the pathophysiology of TMD-related pain and the effectiveness of analgesic treatments for this pain is required.

A unilateral sympathetic blockade does not affect stress-related pain and muscle activity in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain

OBJECTIVE

Chronic musculoskeletal pain is often exacerbated by mental and social stress. The association between stress and musculoskeletal pain is potentially mediated by peripheral sympathetic nerves, either directly or indirectly through muscle activity. In the present study we wanted to determine whether sympathetic blockade could affect either the pain or the muscular activity experienced during mental stress in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.

METHODS

We performed a unilateral anaesthetic blockade of the lower cervical sympathetic ganglion (ganglion stellatum) in 18 patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain (10 with fibromyalgia and eight with chronic shoulder/neck pain). After the blockade the patients performed a 60-minute stressful task with low-grade mental stress that has induced pain and muscle activity in earlier experiments. Surface electromyography (SEMG) of the forehead, temples, neck, and shoulders, and heart rate and blood pressure were recorded together with ratings of pain.

RESULTS

We did not find any side or sidextime effect for pain or muscular activity in any of the four muscle groups (p>0.12).

CONCLUSION

We investigated the potential involvement of peripheral sympathetic nerves in stress-related musculoskeletal pain. A peripheral sympathetic block did not affect pain and muscle responses to a stressful task. Other explanatory models should be implemented and tested experimentally to further investigate the clinical impression that mental stress exacerbates pain in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.