Jaw-motor effects of experimental jaw-muscle pain and stress in patients with deep bite and matched control subjects

Oro-facial function and quality of life in children and adolescents with large horizontal maxillary overjet-A case-control study

BACKGROUND

Large horizontal maxillary overjet (overjet) is associated with reduced bite force (BF) and number of contacts, which influence the chewing effectivity (CE). Oral health, oro-facial function (OF) and malocclusion have great impact on psychological well-being and quality of life (QoL).

OBJECTIVES

The aims of the study were to examine OF, temporomandibular disorders (TMD), BF, CE, QoL and well-being in children and adolescents with large overjet.

METHODS

The study was a case-control study including healthy children with large overjet in the study group compared to a control group of healthy children with neutral occlusion, all 9-14 years old. OF was examined by use of Nordic Orofacial Test-Screening (NOT-S), Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) and registration of morphological and functional occlusion. QoL and well-being were examined using KIDSCREEN-10 and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.

RESULTS

The study and control groups included 37 and 32 participants, respectively. Significantly increased NOT-S score (p < .001) and reduced BF (p = .011), numbers of contacts (p < .001) and CE (p = .005) were found in the study group. BF, numbers of contacts and CE were negatively associated with erupting canines and premolars. No significant difference was found in age, gender, dental eruption, TMD diagnosis or QoL between the groups. Significantly increased emotional symptoms (p = .007), hyperactivity (p = .043) and total difficulties score (p = .009) were found in the study group.

CONCLUSION

The study group showed higher NOT-S score and reduced BF, number of contacts and CE. No difference in QoL were found between the groups, although reduced well-being and increased emotional symptoms, hyperactivity and total difficulties were found in the study group.

[Does gender make a difference in orthodontics? A literature review]

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this literature review is to investigate whether the gender of patients and practitioners makes any difference to orthodontic treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-nine articles were selected, the vast majority of which studied patient gender.

RESULTS

Young females are the category of patients which most often apply for orthodontic treatment, probably because of their higher aesthetic demands, despite their objective needs being no greater. Aesthetic, skeletal and dental analyses reveal an obvious dimorphism with larger dimensions in males, especially for the nose, cheekbones, mouth and mandibular canines. Nevertheless, cephalometric angular values do not vary significantly between male and female individuals. Growth is quantitatively greater in males. It also occurs later, as does eruption and maturation of their teeth. Response to the different orthodontic / orthopedic therapies would appear not to differ according to the sex of the patient.

DISCUSSION

These results, however, need to be qualified according to the country concerned, the patients' life style and mind frames, as these can modify or influence the studied parameters.

Effect of experimental jaw muscle pain on dynamic bite force during mastication

Knowledge about how Temporomandibular Disorder (TMD) pain patients regulate masticatory function is still unclear. To investigate the effect of experimental jaw muscle pain as well as texture and size of food on mastication, twelve healthy participants (30.6±7.5 years old) participated in this study. Experimental pain was induced by an infusion of 0.5 M monosodium glutamate (MSG) with isotonic saline (IS) serving as a control. After the infusions, the Jaw Functional Limitation Scale (JFLS) and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) were filled out. Electromyographic (EMG) activity in the masseter and temporalis muscles, jaw movements and bite force, which was measured by a customized intra-oral device, were recorded simultaneously during mastication of three different types of food. Pain was scored continuously on a visual analog scale. The results demonstrated a trend towards a decrease in the impulse of the bite force, as well as a significant decrease in EMG activity of the masseter muscle during the first five masticatory cycles, in the MSG session. Also, MSG induced increased JFLS and PCS scores compared with IS. On the other hand, the results suggested that the applied levels of pain may not change habitual masticatory movements. This study has revealed that a clinically relevant level of pain in the masseter muscle has only minor impact on the performance of mastication, probably due to a lack of exacerbation of pain during function. In future studies of jaw muscle function during painful conditions, it is important to include patient-based reports of functional limitation and emotional distress.