Prediction of agenesis of the mandibular second premolar using the developmental stages of the mandibular canine, first premolar, and second molar

Criteria for early diagnosis of mandibular third molar agenesis based on the developmental stages of mandibular canine, first and second premolars, and second molar: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Permanent first molars with severe dental caries, developmental defects, or involved in oral pathologies are at risk of poor prognosis in children. Accordingly, using the third molar to replace the first molar can be a good treatment option when third molar agenesis is predicted early. Thus, this retrospective cohort study aimed to develop criteria for early detection of mandibular third molar (L8) agenesis based on the developmental stages of mandibular canine (L3), first premolar (L4), second premolar (L5), and second molar (L7).

METHOD

Overall, 1,044 and 919 panoramic radiographs of 343 males and 317 females, respectively, taken between the ages of 6 and 12 years were included. All developmental stages of L3, L4, L5, L7, and L8 were analyzed based on the dental age, as suggested by Demirjian et al. The independent t-test was used to assess age differences between males and females. The rank correlation coefficients were examined using Kendall's tau with bootstrap analysis and Bonferroni's correction to confirm the teeth showing developmental stages most similar to those of L8s. Finally, a survival analysis was performed to determine the criteria for the early diagnosis of mandibular third molar agenesis.

RESULTS

Some age differences were found in dental developmental stages between males and females. Correlation coefficients between all stages of L3, L4, L5, and L7 and L8 were high. In particular, the correlation coefficient between L7 and L8 was the highest, whereas that between L3 and L8 was the lowest.

CONCLUSION

If at least two of the following criteria (F stage of L3, F stage of L4, F stage of L5, and E stage of L7) are met in the absence of L8 crypt, agenesis of L8 can be confirmed.

Developmental enamel defects and dental anomalies of number and size in children with growth hormone deficiency

Growth hormone is meaningfully involved in the processes of tooth cells differentiation and tissue formation. The aim of the study was to evaluate the occurrence of dental anomalies: microdontia, macrodontia, hypodontia and developmental defects of enamel (DDE) amongst a group of isolated growth hormone deficient (GHD) patients and healthy children. This cross-sectional study was based on a group of 101 Caucasian children: 33 with GHD (mean age 10.94, SD 2.51) and 68 being healthy, normal height subjects (mean age 10.4, SD 2.38). The dental examination in primary and permanent teeth was carried out by one trained and calibrated dentist, in accordance with the WHO guidelines. It was observed that 33% of GHD patients suffer from dental anomalies (hypodontia, microdontia or macrodontia), the difference between the study group and the control group was statistically significant (33% vs 4%, p < 0.001). Hypodontia and microdontia/macrodontia were the most common problems affecting 18% and 21% of the GHD individuals, respectively. The prevalence of DDE did not differ significantly between GHD group and the control group (58% vs 48%, p > 0.05). As children with GHD present more dental anomalies than their healthy coevals, clinicians should be aware of the possible oral health problems associated with GHD and consider dental screening and management as part of the patient's overall health care plan.

Applicability of the London Atlas method in the East China population

BACKGROUND

Dental age estimation is important for developmental assessment and individual identification. The London Atlas, a recently proposed method for dental age estimation, has been reported to perform satisfactorily in various populations.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we assessed the reproducibility, repeatability and applicability of the London Atlas method in the East China population and compared it with the Demirjian method.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We assessed panoramic radiographs of 835 pediatric patients ages 6.0-19.9 years using the London Atlas and the Demirjian method. We employed the intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis to evaluate reproducibility and repeatability, respectively. We assessed the agreement between dental age and chronological age and calculated 95% and 80% prediction intervals for each dental age stage. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were calculated to assess the performance of both methods for identifying threshold ages.

RESULTS

The London Atlas has better reproducibility and repeatability (intraclass correlation coefficients: 0.98 and 0.99; 95% limits of agreement: - 1.34 to 1.56 and - 1.22 to 0.88, respectively). Dental age estimated using the London Atlas was closer to chronological age in both genders (median absolute error = 0.58). The 95% prediction intervals for chronological age were wide (0.99 to 9.89 years).

CONCLUSION

The London Atlas has excellent reproducibility and repeatability. Thus, it might offer an alternative method for developmental assessment. We observed considerable variation in dental development in the East China population, which needs further research.

Prediction of agenesis of the maxillary second premolar based on the developmental stages of the maxillary canine, first premolar, and second molar

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to suggest criteria for the early diagnosis of agenesis of the maxillary second premolars (U5) based on the developmental stages of the maxillary canines (U3), first premolars (U4), and second molars (U7).

DESIGN

Overall, 303 control patients and 72 patients with agenesis who met the inclusion criteria were analyzed among 5136 patients aged 5-11 years for whom panoramic radiographs were obtained at Seoul National University Dental Hospital from June 2008 to December 2009. All developmental stages of U3, U4, U5, and U7 in both groups were evaluated and categorized into the stages proposed by Demirjian et al. To confirm the delayed dental development in the agenesis group, the Wilcoxon rank sum test was used. For verifying the tooth with the most similar developmental pattern to U5, the Kendall tau Rank Correlation and Bootstrap methods were used. Moreover, survival analysis and leave-one-out-cross-validation were performed to identify the earliest developmental stages of U3, U4, and U7 at which agenesis of U5 can be confirmed.

RESULTS

The developmental stage of U4 in the agenesis group was significantly delayed compared with that in the control group at ages 5-10. All of the stages of U3, U4, and U7 showed high correlation coefficients with U5.

CONCLUSION

U5 agenesis can be confirmed with high prediction accuracy when at least two of the three conditions are satisfied: U3, U4, and U7 in Demirjian stages E, D, and C, respectively.