[Withholding or withdrawing life saving treatment in pediatric intensive care unit: GFRUP guidelines]

The State of the Do-Not-Resuscitate Order in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit in the Middle East: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVES

The Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) order is part of most hospitals' policies on the process of making and communicating decisions about a patient's resuscitation status. Yet it has not become a part of our society's ritual of dying in the Middle East especially among children. Given the diversity of pediatric patients, the DNR order continues to represent a challenge to all parties involved in the care of children including the medical team and the family.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of the medical charts of patients who had died in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of a tertiary academic institution in Beirut, Lebanon within the period of January 2012 and December 2017.

RESULTS

Eighty-two charts were extracted, 79 were included in the analysis. Three were excluded as one patient had died in the Emergency Department (ED) and 2 charts were incomplete. Most patients were male, Lebanese, and from Muslim families. These patients clinically presented with primary cardiac and oncological diseases or were admitted from the ED with respiratory distress or from the operating room for post-operative management. The primary cause of death was multiorgan failure and cardiac arrest. Only 34% of families had agreed to a DNR order prior to death and 10% suggested "soft" resuscitation. Most discussions were held in the presence of the parents, the PICU team and the patient's primary physician.

CONCLUSIONS

The DNR order presents one of the most difficult challenges for all care providers involved, especially within a culturally conservative setting such as Lebanon. As the numbers suggest, it is difficult for parents to reach the decision to completely withhold resuscitative measures for pediatric patients, instead opting for "soft" resuscitations like administering epinephrine without chest compressions.

Life-sustaining treatment decisions in pediatric intensive care: an Italian survey on ethical concerns

Objectives

To investigate how life-sustaining treatment (LST) decisions are made and identify problematic ethical concerns confronted by physicians and nurses in pediatric intensive care within Italy.

Methods

An 88-question online survey was created, based on a previous qualitative study conducted by this team. The survey was designed to identify how LST decisions were managed; contrasting actual practices with what participants think practices should be. Replies from physicians and nurses were compared, to identify potential inter-professional ethical tensions. The study also identified participants’ principal ethical concerns. Moreover, open-ended questions elicited qualitative perspectives on participants’ views. The survey was pilot-tested and refined before initiation of the study.

Results

31 physicians and 65 nurses participated in the study. Participants were recruited from pediatric intensive care units across five Italian cities; i.e., Florence, Milan, Padua, Rome, Verona. Statistically significant differences were identified for (a) virtually all questions contrasting actual practices with what participants think practices should be and (b) 14 questions contrasting physician replies with those of nurses. Physicians and nurses identified the absence of legislative standards for LST withdrawal as a highly problematic ethical concern. Physicians also identified bearing responsibility for LST decisions as a major concern. Qualitative descriptions further demonstrated that these Italian pediatric intensive care clinicians encounter significantly distressing ethical problems in their practice.

Conclusions

The results of this study highlight a need for the development of (a) strategies for improving team processes regarding LST decisions, so they can be better aligned with how clinicians think decisions should be made, and (b) Italian LST decision-making standards that can help ensure optimal ethical practices.

Withholding and withdrawing treatment in pediatric intensive care. Update of the GFRUP recommendations

In 2005, the French-speaking task force on pediatric critical and emergency care [Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et d'Urgences Pédiatriques (GFRUP)] issued recommendations on withholding and withdrawing treatments in pediatric critical care. Since then, the French Public Health Code, modified by the laws passed in 2005 and 2016 and by their enactment decrees, has established a legal framework for practice. Now, 15 years later, an update of these recommendations was needed to factor in the experience acquired by healthcare teams, new questions raised by practice surveys, the recommendations issued in the interval, the changes in legislation, and a few legal precedents. The objective of this article is to help pediatric critical care teams find the closest possible compromise between the ethical principles guiding the care offered to the child and the family and compliance with current regulations and laws.

Neonatal end-of-life decision-making almost 20 years after the EURONIC study: A French survey

Nearly 20 years ago the EURONIC study reported that French neonatologists sometimes deemed it legitimate to terminate the lives of newborn infants when the prognosis appeared extremely poor. Parents were not always informed of these decisions. Major change has occurred since then and is described herein.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A survey was conducted in the Île-de-France region, from 1 January to 31 January 2016. Professionals from 15 neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) were invited to complete a questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 702 questionnaires were collected and 670 responses were analyzed. Knowledge of the law differed according to professional status, with 71% of MDs (medical staff, MS), compared with 28% of nonmedical staff (NMS) declaring that they had good knowledge of the law. Most MDs and NMS believed that withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatments (WWLST) could be decided and implemented after a delay. Half of them thought that WWLST would always result in death. Although required by law, a consulting MD attended the collegial meeting required before deciding on WWLST in only half of the cases. Parents were almost always informed of the decision thereafter by the physician in charge of their infant. The most frequent disagreement with parents was observed when WWLST was the option selected. In this case, most professionals suggested postponing WWLST, continuing intensive care and dialogue with parents, aiming at a final shared decision. Major differences were observed between NICUs with regard to the withdrawal of artificial nutrition and hydration. Finally, 14% of MDs declared that infant active terminations of life still occurred in their NICU. Major differences concern WWLST and active termination of life, whose meaning has been partly modified since 2001.

CONCLUSION

Several major changes were observed in this survey: (1) treatment withdrawal decisions are made today in agreement with the law; (2) parents' information and involvement in the decision process have profoundly changed; (3) active termination of life (euthanasia) very rarely occurs; only at the end of a process in accordance with ethical principles and within the law is this decision made.

[The specificities of perinatal bereavement]

Parents can be faced with a situation of bereavement during pregnancy or birth. It is often during a later pregnancy, an ultrasound scan or a subsequent birth, that some will talk about the loss of a child. These situations resulting in bereavement during pregnancy or perinatal bereavement are specific and all perinatal caregivers must be aware of them.

Réflexions éthiques et démarche palliative intégrée dans les réanimations pédiatriques françaises en 2017

En réanimation pédiatrique, 40 % des décès surviennent à la suite d’une décision de limitation ou d’arrêt de traitement (LAT). Ces situations sont sources de questionnements éthiques complexes au sein de l’équipe soignante. La législation française et les recommandations des sociétés savantes donnent un cadre aux réanimateurs pédiatres pour les prises de décisions de LAT. Les enquêtes de pratiques nous montrent qu’ils se sont approprié certains éléments de la procédure collégiale comme la nécessité de la concertation pluriprofessionnelle, l’information et la communication avec les parents. Néanmoins, certains points tels que la présence du consultant, la réalité de la collégialité avec l’expression de toutes les personnes soignantes présentes sont encore insuffisamment appliqués. La place des parents dans les décisions doit être également réfléchie. La collaboration entre les équipes de réanimation pédiatrique et de médecine palliative est une possibilité pour améliorer sensiblement la qualité des soins et de l’accompagnement proposés. Cette collaboration élargit également les possibilités de la réflexion éthique nécessaire dans les situations de fin de vie complexes. L’intégration dans l’enseignement de la réanimation des principes de la médecine palliative est en cours de réflexion.

Ethical, Cultural, Social, and Individual Considerations Prior to Transition to Limitation or Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Therapies

As part of the invited supplement on Death and Dying in the PICU, we reviewed ethical, cultural, and social considerations for the bedside healthcare practitioner prior to engaging with children and families in decisions about limiting therapies, withholding, or withdrawing therapies in a PICU. Clarifying beliefs and values is a necessary prerequisite to approaching these conversations. Striving for medical consensus is important. Discussion, reflection, and ethical analysis may determine a range of views that may reasonably be respected if professional disagreements persist. Parental decisional support is recommended and should incorporate their information needs, perceptions of medical uncertainty, child's condition, and their role as a parent. Child's involvement in decision making should be considered, but may not be possible. Culturally attuned care requires early examination of cultural perspectives before misunderstandings or disagreements occur. Societal influences may affect expectations and exploration of such may help frame discussions. Hospital readiness for support of social media campaigns is recommended. Consensus with family on goals of care is ideal as it addresses all parties' moral stance and diminishes the risk for superseding one group's value judgments over another. Engaging additional supportive services early can aid with understanding or resolving disagreement. There is wide variation globally in ethical permissibility, cultural, and societal influences that impact the clinician, child, and parents. Thoughtful consideration to these issues when approaching decisions about limitation or withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies will help to reduce emotional, spiritual, and ethical burdens, minimize misunderstanding for all involved, and maximize high-quality care delivery.

[Communication, information, and roles of parents in the pediatric intensive care unit: A review article]

Pediatric intensive care units (PICUs), whose accessibility to parents raises controversy, often operate under their own rules. Patients are under critical and unstable conditions, often in a life-threatening situation. In this context, the communication with the parents and their participation in the unit may be difficult. Information is a legal, deontological, and moral duty for caregivers, confirmed by the parents' needs. But the ability to enforce them is a challenge, and there is a gap between the theory and the reality. The communication between the parents and the physicians starts at the admission of the child with a family conference. According to the Société de réanimation de langue française (SRLF), the effectiveness of the communication is based on three criteria: the patients' comprehension, their satisfaction and their anxiety and depression. It has been shown that comprehension depends on multiple factors, related on the parents, the physicians, and the medical condition of the child. Regarding the parents' participation in the organization of the service, the parents' presence is becoming an important factor. In the PICU, the parents' status has evolved. They become a member of the care team, as a partner. The best interest of the child is always discussed with the parents, as the person knowing the best their child. This partnership gives them a responsibility, which is complementary to the physician's one, but does not substitute it.

La famille face à l’enfant gravement malade : le point de vue du psychologue

La maladie grave atteint profondément et douloureusement l’enfant qui en souffre, mais aussi l’ensemble de sa famille. Celle-ci se retrouve précipitée dans une crise émotionnelle aiguë déclenchée par la menace de perdre l’enfant ainsi que par la remise en question des fantasmes d’immortalité de l’enfant et de l’ensemble des membres de sa famille. Cette situation induit des vécus et des sentiments variés (recherche de sens, sentiment d’échec, angoisse, agressivité, sentiment d’impuissance, de culpabilité, etc.) qui auront un impact inévitable sur l’enfant, sa famille et les relations aux soignants.

Notre expérience de plus de 15 ans en pédiatrie aiguë nous a appris que si la capacité à faire face à la maladie grave de l’enfant varie selon des facteurs personnels (la personnalité, l’âge de l’enfant, le tempérament de chacun), elle dépend aussi du couple parental et du système familial dans ses aspects d’adaptabilité, de communication, de cohésion et de développement.

En passant par la retranscription du discours de quelques familles, nous abordons quelques réactions parentales et familiales face à l’enfant gravement malade, en s’attardant sur certaines situations complexes (bébé malformé, enfant de parents séparés, besoins des parents dont l’enfant est en soins palliatifs) et sur quelques pistes de réflexion autour de leur accompagnement. Nous terminerons en évoquant brièvement la question du deuil et de son suivi.

[Development, implementation, and analysis of a "collaborative decision-making for reasonable care" document in pediatric palliative care]

INTRODUCTION

In France, a legal framework and guidelines state that decisions to limit treatments (DLT) require a collaborative decision meeting and a transcription of decisions in the patient's file. The do-not-attempt-resuscitation order involves the same decision-making process for children in palliative care. To fulfill the law's requirements and encourage communication within the teams, the Resource Team in Pediatric Palliative Care in Aquitaine created a document shared by all children's hospital units, tracing the decision-making process. This study analyzed the decision-making process, quality of information transmission, and most particularly the relevance of this new "collaborative decision-making for reasonable care" card.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective study evaluating the implementation of a traceable document relating the DLT process. All the data sheets collected between January and December 2013 were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 58 data sheets were completed between January and December 2013. We chose to collect the most relevant data to evaluate the relevance of the items to be completed and the transmission of the document, to draw up the patients' profile, and the contents of discussions with families. Of the 58 children for whom DLT was discussed, 41 data sheets were drawn up in the pediatric intensive care unit, seven in the oncology and hematology unit, five in the neonatology unit, four in the neurology unit, and one in the pneumology unit. For 30 children, one sheet was created, for 11 children, two sheets and for two children, three sheets were filled out. Thirty-nine decisions were made for withholding lifesaving treatment, 11 withdrawing treatment, and for five children, no limitation was set. Nine children survived after DLT. Of the 58 data sheets, only 31 discussions with families were related to the content of the data sheet. Of the 14 children transferred out of the unit with a completed data sheet, it was transmitted to the new unit for 11 children (79%).

DISCUSSION

The number of data sheets collected in 1 year shows the value of this document. The participation of several pediatric specialities' referents in its creation, then its progressive presentation in the children's hospital units, were essential steps in introducing and establishing its use. Items describing the situation, management proposals, and adaptation of the children's supportive care were completed in the majority of cases. They correspond to a clinical description, the object of the discussion, and the daily caregiver's practices, respectively. On the other hand, discussions with families were related to the card's contents in only 53% of the cases. This can be explained by the time required to complete the DLT process. It is difficult for referring doctors to systematically, faithfully, and objectively transcribe discussions with parents. Although this process has been used for a long time in intensive care units, this document made possible an indispensable formalisation in the decision-making process. In other pediatric specialities, the sheet allowed introducing the palliative approach and was a starter and a tool for reflection on the do-not-attempt-resuscitation order, thus suggesting the need for anticipation in these situations.

CONCLUSION

With the implementation of this new document, the DLT, data transmission, and continuity of care conditions were improved in the children's hospital units. Sharing this sheet with all professionals in charge of these children would support homogeneity and quality of management and care for children and their parents.

[Multicentric study of medical care and practices in spinal muscular atrophy type 1 over two 10-year periods]

AIM

Questions about care practices and the role of palliative care in pediatric neurodegenerative diseases have led the Neuromuscular Committee of the French Society of Neurology to conduct a retrospective study in spinal muscular atrophy type 1, a genetic disease most often leading to death before the age of 1 year.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective multicenter study from pediatricians included in the reference centers of pediatric neuromuscular diseases was carried out on two 10-year periods (1989-1998 and 1999-2009).

RESULTS

The 1989-1998 period included 12 centers with 106 patients, the 1999-2009 period 13 centers with 116 children. The mean age of onset of clinical signs was 2.1 months (range, 0-5.5 months), the median age at diagnosis was 4 months (range, 0-9 months) vs 3 months. The median age of death was 7.5 months (range, 0-24 months) vs 6 months. The care modalities included physiotherapy (90 %), motor support (61 % vs 26 % for the previous period), enteral nutrition by nasogastric tube (52 % vs 24 %), and 3.4 % of children had a gastrostomy (vs 1.8 %). At home, pharyngeal aspiration was used in 64 % (vs 41 %), oxygen therapy in 8 %, noninvasive ventilatory support in 7 %. The mean age at death was 8.1 months (range, 0-24 months) vs 7 months, the time from diagnosis to death was 4 months vs 3 months. Death occurred at home in 23 % vs 17 %, in a pediatric unit in 62 % vs 41 %. The use of analgesics and sedative drugs was reported in 60 % of cases: 40 % morphine (vs 18 %) and benzodiazepines in 48 % (vs 29 %). Respiratory support was limited mostly to oxygen by nasal tube (55 % vs 54 %), noninvasive ventilation in 9 % of the cases, and intubation and assisted mechanical ventilation (2 %).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

These results confirm a change in practices and the development of palliative care in children with a French consensus of practices quite different from the standard care in North-America and closer to the thinking of English medical teams. A prospective study within the 2011 national hospital clinical research program (PHRC 2011) is beginning in order to evaluate practices and the role of families and caregivers.

[The practices of withdrawing artificial nutrition and hydration in the neonatal intensive care unit: a preliminary study]

INTRODUCTION

Prematurity is one of the etiologies for severe neurological complications. Decisions to withdraw therapeutics, including artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH), are sometimes discussed. But can one withdraw ANH if the patient is a child suffering from severe neurological conditions, based on his best interests? The aim of this study was to further the understanding of the complexity of the withdrawal of ANH and its implementation in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

METHOD

This qualitative preliminary study based on a questionnaire was conducted on the staff in the NICU of the Pontoise medical center (France) in February 2012. The results were compared with the current knowledge on this issue and sociological data.

RESULTS

Ten of the hospital staff members responded to the questionnaire: 60% considered ANH as a treatment, but the status of ANH (i.e., treatment or care) remained undefined for several respondents. Comparison with the withdrawal of mechanical ventilation or adult practices seemed to be inadequate. The staff had little experience in the domain and therefore few certainties on practices. Half of the respondents indicated that terminal sedation needed to be used. For the other half, it depended on the patient's pain. Timing was also an important notion given that the newborn is a being developing and evolving each in its own way.

CONCLUSION

The withdrawal of ANH remains controversial in the NICU. Humanity, culture, and the relationship to others are ever present in the decision-making process, creating a moral opposition above and beyond ethical reflection.

The parents', hospitalized child's, and health care providers' perceptions and experiences of family centered care within a pediatric critical care setting: a metasynthesis of qualitative research

The delivery of family centered care (FCC) occurs within varied pediatric care settings with a belief that this model of care meets the psychosocial, emotional, and physical needs of the hospitalized child and family. The aim of this review was to explore the attitudes, experiences, and implementation of FCC from many studies and to facilitate a wider and more thorough understanding of this practice from a diverse sample of parents, hospitalized children, and their health care providers within a pediatric critical care setting. A metasynthesis is an integration of qualitative research findings based on a systematic review of the literature. Thirty original research articles focusing on family-centered care experiences from the hospitalized child's, parents', and health care providers' perception published between 1998 and 2011 met the criteria for the review. Nine syntheses from 17 themes emerged from the synthesis of the literature: Prehospital, Entry into the Hospital, Journeying Through Unknown Waters, Information, Relationships, The hospital Environment, The Possibility of Death, Religion and Spirituality, and The Journey Home. The individual cultures of the critical care units helped create and reinforce the context of parental needs where satisfaction with communication, information, and relationships were interconnecting factors that helped maintain the positive or negative experiences for the parent, hospitalized child, and/or health care providers.

Charles Taylor, hermeneutics and social imaginaries: a framework for ethics research

Hermeneutics, also referred to as interpretive phenomenology, has led to important contributions to nursing research. The philosophy of Charles Taylor has been a major source in the development of contemporary hermeneutics, through his ontological and epistemological articulations of the human sciences. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate that Taylor's ideas can further enrich hermeneutic inquiry in nursing research, particularly for investigations of ethical concerns. The paper begins with an outline of Taylor's hermeneutical framework, followed by a review of his key ideas relevant for ethics research. The paper ends with a discussion of my empirical research with critically ill children in Canada and France in relation to Taylor's ideas, chiefly Social Imaginaries. I argue that Taylor's hermeneutics provides a substantive moral framework as well as a methodology for examining ethical concerns.

[Epidemiology and evaluation of withdrawing and withholding of treatment procedure in a pediatric intensive care unit]

OBJECTIVES

Leonetti Law of 2005 concerns procedures for questioning about the appropriateness of initiating or maintaining life-sustaining treatments. Decision of withdrawing and withholding treatment has long been practiced by neonatologists, adult and pediatricians intensivists. In this regard, the recommendations of societies encourage medical teams to assess their practices to improve them. Our evaluation is based on the document of the Ethics Committee of SRLF edited in 2010.

TYPE OF STUDY

We achieved a retrospective evaluation of professional practices of the transcription of our decisions of withdrawing and withholding treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study included all children (95 patients) who have had a questioning about life-sustaining treatment of ICU between March 2008 and August 2011 in the pediatric intensive care unit of Children's Hospital of Lyon. Our evaluation is based on the document of the Ethics Committee of French Society of intensive care (SRLF) edited in 2010. We collected epidemiological data on children concerned by questioning about the appropriateness of initiating or maintaining LST and an evaluation of the transcription of our procedures for LST in our folders. Evaluation included 40 cases: 20 folders randomly selected prior an information meeting (January 2011) which were compared with 20 cases occurred consecutively after this information. This meeting was intended to remind recommendations of good practice and principal points of the law. The main assessment measure was the improvement of the practices respecting criteria of the document of the Ethics Committee of SRLF modified for pediatric care.

MAIN RESULTS

Epidemiological data on procedures are comparable to literature data. Concerning the evaluation of our practices before/after a briefing and highlighted a tendency to the improvement without statistically significance. The transcription of reflection and the arguments of decision of withdrawing and withholding treatment and evaluation of pain was the points who need improvement. Finally, despite the positive developments in the therapeutic use of analgesics and sedatives, pain continues to be undervalued.

CONCLUSION

The evaluation of professional practices is recommended to improve the procedures of questioning about life-sustaining treatments have become an area of expertise in intensive care.

Struggling to do what is right for the child: pediatric life-support decisions among physicians and nurses in France and Quebec

This study examined (a) how physicians and nurses in France and Quebec make decisions about life-sustaining therapies (LSTs) for critically ill children and (b) corresponding ethical challenges. A focus groups design was used. A total of 21 physicians and 24 nurses participated (plus 9 physicians and 13 nurses from a prior secondary analysis). Principal differences related to roles: French participants regarded physicians as responsible for LST decisions, whereas Quebec participants recognized parents as formal decision-makers. Physicians stated they welcomed nurses' input but found they often did not participate, while nurses said they wanted to contribute but felt excluded. The LST limitations were based on conditions resulting in long-term consequences, irreversibility, continued deterioration, inability to engage in relationships and loss of autonomy. Ethical challenges related to: the fear of making errors in the face of uncertainty; struggling with patient/family consequences of one's actions; questioning the parental role and dealing with relational difficulties between physicians and nurses.

Tracheotomy and children with spinal muscular atrophy type 1: ethical considerations in the French context

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) type 1 is a genetic neuromuscular disease in children that leads to degeneration of spinal cord motor neurons. This sometimes results in severe muscular paralysis requiring mechanical ventilation to sustain the child's life. The onset of SMA type 1, the most severe form of the disease, is during the first year of life. These children become severely paralysed, but retain their intellectual capacity. Ethical concerns arise when mechanical ventilation becomes necessary for survival. When professionals assess the resulting life for the child and family, they sometimes fear it will result in unreasonably excessive care. The aim of this article is to present an analysis of ethical arguments that could support or oppose the provision of invasive ventilation in this population. This examination is particularly relevant as France is one of the few countries performing tracheotomies and mechanical ventilation for this condition.

Understanding the private worlds of physicians, nurses, and parents: a study of life-sustaining treatment decisions in Italian paediatric critical care

This study's aim was to describe: (a) How life-sustaining treatment (LST) decisions are made for critically ill children in Italy; and (b) How these decisional processes are experienced by physicians, nurses and parents. Focus groups with 16 physicians and 26 nurses, and individual interviews with 9 parents were conducted. Findings uncovered the 'private worlds' of paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) physicians, nurses and parents; they all suffer tremendously and privately. Physicians struggle with the weight of responsibility and solitude in making LST decisions. Nurses struggle with feelings of exclusion from decisions regarding patients and families that they care for. Physicians and nurses are distressed by legal barriers to LST withdrawal. Parents struggle with their dependence on physicians and nurses to provide care for their child and strive to understand what is happening to their child. Features of helpful and unhelpful communication with parents are highlighted, which should be considered in educational and practice changes.

Prevalence of questioning regarding life-sustaining treatment and time utilisation by forgoing treatment in francophone PICUs

PURPOSE

Our goal is to assess the prevalence of questioning about the appropriateness of initiating or maintaining life-sustaining treatments (LST) in French-speaking paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) and to evaluate time utilisation related to decision-making processes (DMP).

METHODS

18-month, multicentre, prospective, descriptive, observational study in 15 French-speaking PICUs.

RESULTS

Among the 5,602 children admitted, 410 died (7.3%), including 175 after forgoing LST (42.7% of deaths). LST was questioned in 308 children (5.5%) with a prevalence of 13.3 per 100 patient-days. More than 30% of children survived despite the appropriateness of LST being questioned (23% despite a decision to forgo treatment). Median caregiver time spent on making and presenting the decisions was 11 h per child.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, on any given day in each 10-bed PICU, there was more than one child for whom a DMP was underway. Of children, 23% survived despite a decision to forgo LST being made, which underlines the need to elaborate a care plan for these children. Also, DMP represented a large amount of staff time that is undervalued but necessary to ensure optimal palliative practice in PICU.

The process of end-of-life decision-making in pediatrics: a national survey in the Netherlands

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to investigate how Dutch pediatric specialists reach end-of-life decisions, how they involve parents, and how they address conflicts.

METHODS

We conducted a national cross-sectional survey among pediatric intensivists, oncologists, neurologists, neurosurgeons, and metabolic pediatricians practicing in the 8 Dutch university hospitals. We collected information on respondents' overall opinions and their clinical practice.

RESULTS

Of the 185 eligible pediatric specialists, 74% returned the questionnaire. All responding physicians generally discuss an end-of-life decision with colleagues before discussing it with parents. In half of the reported cases, respondents informed parents about the intended decision and asked their permission. In one-quarter of the cases, respondents informed parents without asking for their permission. In the remaining one-quarter of the cases, respondents advised parents and consequently allowed them to have the decisive voice. The chosen approach is highly influenced by type of decision and type and duration of treatment. Conflicts within medical teams arose as a result of uncertainties about prognosis and treatment options. Most conflicts with parents arose because parents had a more positive view of the prognosis or had religious objections to treatment discontinuation. All conflicts were eventually resolved by a combination of strategies. In 66% of all cases, pain and symptom management were intensified before the child's death.

CONCLUSIONS

Within Dutch pediatrics, end-of-life decisions are team decisions. Pediatric specialists differ considerably in how they involve parents in end-of-life decision-making, ranging from benevolent paternalism to parental autonomy. Main conflict-solving strategies are taking more time and extending discussions.

End-of-life decisions in pediatric intensive care. Recommendations of the Italian Society of Neonatal and Pediatric Anesthesia and Intensive Care (SARNePI)

End-of-life decisions represent one of the most complex and challenging issues in pediatric intensive care. These recommendations aim to offer Italian pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) teams a framework for the end-of-life decision-making process. The paper proposes a process based on the principle that the use of a diagnostic or therapeutic tool must comply with a 'criterion of proportionality'. Appropriately informed parents, as natural interpreters and advocates of the best interests of their child, can contribute in assessing the burdensomeness of the treatment and determining its proportionality. The decision to limit, withdraw or withhold life-sustaining treatments considered disproportionate represents a clinically and ethically correct choice. This decision should be made (a) collectively by PICU team and the other caregivers, (b) with the explicit involvement of parents, and (c) noting in the patient's clinical record the decisions taken and the reasons behind them. The withdrawing or withholding of life support can never entail the abandonment of the patient nor the withdrawal of any therapy aimed at treating any form of suffering. No action aimed at deliberately hastening the death of the patient is ever acceptable. These recommendations advocate a decision as far as possible shared by patient (whenever feasible), parents and caregivers. Ensuring that all involved are kept fully informed and that there is open and timely communication between them is the key to achieving this. It is the physician in charge of the patient's care and the head of the unit who bear the main responsibility for the final decision.

Fin de vie en médecine néonatale à la lumière de la loi

Two recent laws have significantly reformed the French Public Health Code: the law of March 4th 2002, related to the patient's rights and the quality of the health care system and the law of April 22nd 2005, related to the patient's rights and the end of life. These changes have prompted health care professionals involved in perinatal and neonatal medicine to update their considerations on the ethical aspects of the end of life in neonatal medicine. Therefore, the authors examined the clauses of the law related to the patient's rights and to the end of life, confronting them with the distinctive features of neonatal medicine. In this paper, the medical practices, which are either prohibited or authorized in the course of end of life are considered: prohibition of euthanasia, authorization for alleviating pain at the risk of shortening life, authorization for restricting, withholding or withdrawing treatments. Next, the justifications provided by the legislation to authorize these practices are analysed: prohibition of unreasonable obstinacy and respect for individual wishes. Then, the conditions required by the law to determine and to implement these acts are discussed: consultation with the healthcare staff and justified advice from a consulting physician, consideration of parental opinion, registration of the decision and its justifications into the patient's medical file, protection of the dying patient's dignity and preservation of his life quality by providing palliative care. Lastly, we report the terms of the ethical dilemma which may occur in the area of neonatal medicine in spite of genuine and persevering efforts in order to conciliate legal requirement and ethical responsibility.

Parental involvement in treatment decisions regarding their critically ill child: a comparative study of France and Quebec

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether physicians or parents assume responsibility for treatment decisions for critically ill children and how this relates to subsequent parental experience. A significant controversy has emerged regarding the role of parents, relative to physicians, in relation to treatment decisions for critically ill children. Anglo-American settings have adopted decision-making models where parents are regarded as responsible for such life-support decisions, while in France physicians are commonly considered the decision makers.

DESIGN

Grounded theory qualitative methodology.

SETTING

Four pediatric intensive care units (two in France and two in Quebec, Canada).

PATIENTS

Thirty-one parents of critically ill children; nine physicians and 13 nurses who cared for their children.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Semistructured interviews were conducted. In France, physicians were predominantly the decision makers for treatment decisions. In Quebec, decisional authority practices were more varied; parents were the most common decision maker, but sometimes it was physicians, while for some decisional responsibility depended on the type of decision to be made. French parents appeared more satisfied with their communication and relationship experiences than Quebec parents. French parents referred primarily to the importance of the quality of communication rather than decisional authority. There was no relationship between parents' actual responsibility for decisions and their subsequent guilt experience.

CONCLUSIONS

It was remarkable that a certain degree of medical paternalism was unavoidable, regardless of the legal and ethical norms that were in place. This may not necessarily harm parents' moral experiences. Further research is required to examine parental decisional experience in other pediatric settings.

The moral experience of parents regarding life-support decisions for their critically-ill children: a preliminary study in France

The common paediatric critical care practice in France is for physicians (rather than parents) to maintain the ultimate responsibility for lifesupport decisions in children. Some French literature asserts that it is inappropriate for parents to bear such responsibilities because they do not have the required knowledge and should be protected from feeling culpable for such decisions. The aim of this grounded theory preliminary study was to examine the moral experience of parents of critically-ill children that required life-support decisions in France. A convenience purposive sample of seven parents was recruited in Paris. Five principal themes emerged as significant from these interviews: (1) a need for more information; (2) physicians should be responsible for life-support decisions; (3) the child's concerns and wishes need to be better heard; (4) maternal guilt; and (5) physicians require better training in parent communication. These findings raise important issues for clinical practice and further research in France.