Le cathétérisme veineux ombilical et épicutanéocave chez le nouveau-né

The incidence and mortality rate of catheter-related neonatal pericardial effusion: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUD

Neonatal pericardial effusion (PCE) is one of the most severe complications of central catheters in neonates with its rapid progression and high mortality. We aim to estimate the overall incidence and mortality of catheter-related neonatal PCE, more importantly, to identify possible predictors for clinical reference.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, china national knowledge infrastructure, Wanfang Data, and Sinomed databases for subject words "central catheter," "neonate," "pericardial effusion" and their random words till June 8, 2020. This meta-analysis is based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Possible predictors of occurrences and deaths were extracted and assessed cooperatively. The pooled incidence rate of catheter-related neonatal PCE was calculated using a random effects model.

RESULTS

Twenty-one cohort studies and 99 cases were eligible. Pooled incidence is 3·8‰[2.2‰, 6.7‰]. Polyurethane catheters generate significantly more neonatal PCE than silicone counterparts (P < .01). 27% of the patients die. The mortality of patients with bradycardia is higher than others (P < .05). Catheters with a guidewire result in more deaths than umbilical venous catheter (UVC) and peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) (P < .05). Without pericardiocentesis, mortality increases (P < .01). The difference of deaths between reposition and removing the catheter is insignificant (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Central catheters in Seldinger Technique (with a guidewire) put neonates at greater risk of PCE and consequent death. Silicone catheters excel at avoiding deadly catheter-related PCE, which could be a better choice in neonatal intensive care units (NICU). When catheter-related PCE occurs, timely diagnosis and pericardiocentesis save lives.

[Neonatal liver abscess after umbilical venous catheter]

INTRODUCTION

The use of an umbilical venous catheter (UVC) is common practice in neonatal units and is subjected to strict rules of insertion and monitoring to detect potential complications. Hepatic abscess is one of these rare complications.

OBSERVATION

We report the observation of a 15-day-old female newborn admitted for a hepatic abscess. The patient had been hospitalized at birth in a neonatal intensive care unit. With the appearance of hemodynamic instability on the 4th day of life, a nosocomial infection was suspected and was treated with ceftazidime, vancomycin and amikacin. Later, as the need for O(2) increased and plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) was 190 mg/L, the patient received imipenem and vancomycin, while an abdominal ultrasound examination showed a hepatic abscess. A triple antibiotic treatment was initiated with imipenem, vancomycin, and metronidazole, while the initial examination showed a clinically stable patient with a CRP at 208 mg/L. Abdominal ultrasounds showed a hepatic abscess measuring 53.4×24.9 mm on day 21 and 51.4 mg/L CRP. Then the abscess dimensions decreased to 35.7×14 mm. The antibiotic therapy was maintained for 4 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Hepatic abscess should be suspected in neonates with UVC with sepsis and persistent signs of inflammation in spite of adequate antibiotic treatment.

Vascular access in the neonate

Up to recently, inserting venous or arterial 'lines' in the neonate was essentially based on clinical skill and experience. The recent advent of portable ultrasound (US) machines with paediatric probes has resulted in the development of new approaches that, if correctly learned and used, should allow quicker and safer vascular access in this population. Both classic and new techniques are reviewed on the basis of literature and authors' experience.

[Increased success rate in umbilical venous catheter positioning by posterior liver mobilization]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate prospectively the benefit of posterior liver mobilization during umbilical venous catheterization to place the umbilical venous catheter (UVC) in the central position (inferior vena cava).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-five successive newborn infants admitted in 3 neonatal intensive care units who required a UVC were enrolled over a 4-month period. UVC positions were assessed by X-ray. UVCs were placed either in an adequate position (at the right atrial-inferior vena cava junction, indicating success) or inserted within the portal system (failure). In this case, the UVC was drawn back to the 3cm mark and then, an additional attempt to insert the UVC was made during lateroposterior liver mobilization by the operator's hand. The success and failure rates at 1st and 2nd attempts were evaluated and compared. Characteristics of the population and possible catheter-related complications were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 31 of 65 (55%) UVC insertions failed at the 1st attempt. Among these UVCs, 16 (52%) were correctly repositioned in the central position by hepatic mobilization. The success rate increased by 50% (p<0.05). No life-threatening complications were observed during the procedure.

CONCLUSION

Hand liver mobilization during umbilical venous catheterization improves the rate of adequate insertion of the UVC into the inferior vena cava. It is a simple, quick, and safe procedure.