[Treatment of childhood dystonia]

Outcome measures for children with movement disorders

The huge contribution of advances in the pediatric neurosciences, improvements in clinical practice, and new therapeutic options, has led to the development of new models of treatment and rehabilitation for dystonia in the last decade. It is now generally agreed that a multidimensional therapeutic approach is needed for children with motor disorders, whose motor function-conceived as a complex perceptive, motor and cognitive process - is impaired at a crucial time in their development, with a fall out on how their various adaptive functions evolve. Neurophysiological studies, modern neuroimaging techniques, and advances in cognitive psychology have all contributed to improving our understanding of the potential effects of treatments in early age - not only on the symptoms, but also on plasticity processes and neuronal reorganization. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) promoted by the WHO, and the diffusion of family-centered models of healthcare have underscored the importance of the ecological perspective with a view to providing effective therapies and a satisfactory quality of life for dystonic children and their families. The advances made in this area have made it necessary to study and develope more appropriate treatment outcome measures. In the light of these aspects, there is still not enough literature on the generally-accepted, exhaustive dystonia assessment tools. Given these limits, it might be useful to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the main tools currently used in this setting.

[Clinical and therapeutic aspects in Tunisian patients with dystonia: a 5-year prospective study]

INTRODUCTION

Studies of dystonia are heterogeneous and there are no studies on this disease in Tunisia. The aim of our study was to determine the frequency of dystonia in the hospital population, to identify different forms of dystonia according to age of onset, distribution, to determine etiologies and to describe treatment.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective study over a 5-year period (from January 2005 to November 2009) including all patients diagnosed with dystonia and followed at the Child and Adolescent Neurology Department and "Movement Disorders and Botulinum Toxin" consultation of the National Institute of Neurology of Tunis.

RESULTS

Two hundred patients were included (2.2% of our patients). Mean age was 26.4±21.4 years and sex ratio H:F 1.3. Consanguinity rate was 29%. Main features of dystonia were action dystonia (78.5%), generalized forms (47%) and secondary forms (58%). A pyramidal syndrome and other movement disorders were the most common signs associated with dystonia (36.5% and 33.5% respectively). In the group of secondary dystonia, mains etiologies were dystonia due to exogenic agent (56%), neuro-metabolic diseases (26%), hereditary degenerative disease (13%) and psychogenic dystonia (5%). Dystonia was primary in 44% (84 patients). Different treatments were used and a dramatic improvement in some patients was noted with levodopa and botulinum toxin injections. A multidisciplinary approach associated with medical treatment led to recovery or improved prognosis.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Very few studies have been devoted to reporting a large series of dystonic patients. Our study is the first to describe both primary and secondary dystonia in 200 Tunisian patients. The presence of familial dystonia in our country suggests a genetic origin. Further work including genetic analysis with a screening of known mutations responsible for dystonia and the informative families with unknown mutations would be useful. Specific studies designed to identify new genes causal in dystonia are needed.