[Admissions for pediatric asthma in France]

Pediatric Outpatient Prescriptions in Countries With Advanced Economies in the 21st Century: A Systematic Review

IMPORTANCE

An international comparison of pediatric outpatient prescriptions (POPs) is pivotal to investigate inadequate practices at the national scale and guide corrective actions.

OBJECTIVE

To compare annual POP prevalence among Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) member countries.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

Two independent reviewers systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and institutes of public health or drug agency websites for studies published since 2000 and reporting POP prevalence (expressed as number of patients aged <20 years with ≥1 POP per 1000 pediatric patients per year) in OECD member countries or large geographic areas within them. Risk of bias was assessed for exhaustiveness and representativeness. Prevalence ratios (PRs) were used to compare the highest and lowest POP prevalence among countries overall, by levels of Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification for the overall pediatric population, and by age group (ie, ages <5-6 vs ≥5-6 years), stratifying on prescription-only drug (POD) status.

FINDINGS

Among 11 studies performed on 3 regional and 8 national medicoadministrative databases in 11 countries, 35 552 550 pediatric patients were included. The overall risk of bias was low (10 studies were representative [90.9%], and the prevalence denominator included nonusers of health care for 9 studies [81.8%]). Prevalence of 1 or more POP per year ranged from 480 to 857 pediatric patients per 1000 in Sweden and France, respectively (PR, 1.8 [95% CI, 1.8-1.8]). Overall, among 8 studies reporting ATC level 1 drugs, Denmark had the lowest POP prevalence (eg, systemic hormonal preparations: 9 pediatric patients per 1000 per year) and France the highest (eg, systemic hormonal preparation: 216 pediatric patients per 1000 per year). Among 8 studies reporting ATC level 2 drugs for PODs, the PR between France and Denmark was 108.2 (95% CI, 108.2-108.2) for systemic corticosteroids and 2.1 (95% CI, 2.1-2.1) for drugs for obstructive airway disease. The PR for antibiotics was 3.4 (95% CI, 3.4-3.4) between New Zealand and Sweden. For pediatric patients aged 5 to 6 years or older, the PR for sex hormones was 2.1 (95% CI, 2.1-2.1) between Denmark and France. Among 7 studies reporting ATC level 5 drugs, the prevalence of the 10 most prevalent PODs was less than 100 pediatric patients per 1000 per year in Scandinavian countries and the Netherlands and less than 300 pediatric patients per 1000 per year in France and New Zealand.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study found large between-country variations in POPs, which may suggest substantial inappropriate prescriptions. The findings may suggest guidance for educational campaigns and regulatory decisions in some OECD member countries.

Factors Associated with Asthma Severity in Children: Data from the French COBRAPed Cohort

BACKGROUND

Severe asthma (SA) in children is a complex, heterogeneous disease, associated with a considerable burden. However, factors influencing asthma severity are poorly described and may differ according to age.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether factors associated with asthma severity differ between preschoolers with severe recurrent wheeze (SRW) and school-age children with SA.

METHODS

Data from the French multicenter prospective observational cohort of preschool (3-6 years) children with SRW and nonsevere recurrent wheeze (NSRW) and school-age (7-11 years) children with SA and nonsevere asthma (NSA) (Pediatric Cohort of Bronchial Obstruction and Asthma) were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 131 preschool children (92 SRW and 49 NSRW) and 207 school-age children (92 SA and 115 NSA) were included. In both univariable and multivariable analysis, SRW was associated with second-hand smoke exposure (multivariable analysis: odds ratio [95% CI], 29.8 [3.57-3910]) and exposure to mold/dampness at home (multivariable analysis: odds ratio [95% CI], 4.22 [1.25-18.2]) compared with NSRW. At school-age, history of atopic dermatitis and food allergy was more frequent in children with SA than in those with NSA. Multivariable analysis confirmed that SA was associated with a history of food allergy (odds ratio [95% CI], 5.01 [2.23-11.9]).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that factors influencing asthma severity may differ according to age. In preschool children with SRW, second-hand smoke and exposure to mold are predominant, whereas associated allergic disorders are mainly involved in SA at school-age.

Low-dose l-isoproterenol versus salbutamol in hospitalized pediatric patients with severe acute exacerbation of asthma: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Although the guidelines in most countries do not recommend continuous inhalation of l-isoproterenol to treat pediatric patients with acute severe exacerbation of asthma, lower dose of l-isoproterenol has been widely used in Japan. To determine whether the efficacy of low-dose l-isoproterenol was superior to that of salbutamol, we conducted a double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

Hospitalized patients aged 1-17 years were eligible if they had severe asthma exacerbation defined by the modified pulmonary index score (MPIS). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive inhalation of l-isoproterenol (10 μg/kg/h) or salbutamol (500 μg/kg/h) for 12 hours via a large-volume nebulizer with oxygen. The primary outcome was the change in MPIS from baseline to 3 hours after starting inhalation. Trial registration number UMIN000001991.

RESULTS

From December 2009 to October 2013, 83 patients (42 in the l-isoproterenol group and 41 in the salbutamol group) were enrolled into the study. Of these, one patient in the l-isoproterenol group did not receive the study drug and was excluded from the analysis. Compared with salbutamol, l-isoproterenol reduced MPIS more rapidly. Mean (SD) changes in MPIS at 3 hours were -2.9 (2.5) in the l-isoproterenol group and -0.9 (2.3) in the salbutamol group (difference -2.0, 95% confidence interval -3.1 to -0.9; P < 0.001). Adverse events occurred in 1 (2%) and 11 (27%) patients in the l-isoproterenol and salbutamol groups, respectively (P = 0.003). Hypokalemia and tachycardia occurred only in the salbutamol group.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose l-isoproterenol has a more rapid effect with fewer adverse events than salbutamol.

[Digital action plan for asthma exacerbations (PANAME)]

BACKGROUND

A written action plan (WAP) reduces emergency visits for asthma exacerbations. However, a WAP is underused and often focused on asthma control. The innovation is an AppWeb that includes an expert software aimed at diagnosing the level of severity of asthma exacerbations and delivering a personalized digital action plan (DAP) when patients are in urgent need of medical advice. Symptoms describing the level of severity of asthma exacerbations and the consequent treatments have been established by working groups of the French Respiratory Societies (SPLF and SP2A for adults and children, respectively). The main objective of the study is to evaluate the effect of the DAP on the frequency of urgent medical attendance. Secondary objectives are to evaluate adherence to the DAP compared to a WAP and the qualitative satisfaction of patients using the DAP.

METHODOLOGY

A randomized, prospective, comparative, multicenter study on two parallel groups, conducted in private practice and in hospitals. In both arms, asthmatic patients (240 children aged 6 to 12 years and 270 adults aged 18 to 50 years) with severe asthma exacerbation(s) during the previous year and an Internet connection via a smartphone or a tablet computer, will have at their disposal a WAP and one arm will have, in addition, the DAP. Included patients will be followed up every three months for one year.

EXPECTED RESULTS

A decrease in the number of urgent medical attendances and better adherence in the WAP+DAP group compared to the WAP group.

[Inhaled corticosteroids: Which regimens are appropriate?]

Inhaled corticosteroids are the cornerstone of asthma management. Inhaled corticosteroid regimens differ slightly in various international guidelines on asthma management but are based on the principles of continuous treatment and titration to the lowest effective dose. Several recent studies, nevertheless, appear to demonstrate the potential value of preemptive or "pro re nata" regimens in infants and children. These studies were included in GINA 2015 for children 5 years of age and younger in whom discontinuous treatment is proposed as a second-line option. Should we change our practices after a critical reading of these studies?

Decline in admissions for childhood asthma, a 26-year period population-based study

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of childhood asthma has increased, although the rate of hospitalization for asthma seems to decrease. In Norway, the rate of hospital admission for childhood asthma from 1984 to 2000 increased. The aim of this study was to assess further trends in hospital admissions for childhood asthma up to 2010.

METHODS

A population-based study including children 1-13 yrs of age hospitalized for asthma during six periods from 1984/1985 to 2009/2010 in Rogaland, Norway, was performed. Medical records from 1536 admissions (1050 children) were studied; and gender, age, number of admissions, length of hospital stay, medications and symptoms were recorded.

RESULTS

For all age groups, the rate of admissions per 10.000 increased from 20.1 in 1984/85 to 33.7 in 1989/90, but declined to 14.4 in 2009/2010. Rates were highest in boys (OR 1.87; 95% CI: 1.69, 2.09), younger age groups (OR 2.51; 2.38, 2.64) and decreased from 1984 to 2010 (OR 0.92; 0.88, 0.94). The rates of readmissions were higher than for primary admissions (OR 1.33; 1.19, 1.47). From 1984 to 2010, there was an increased use of inhaled corticosteroids prior to admission (6 to 51%) and started at discharge (7 to 37%), and systemic steroids given during admission (19 to 83%).

CONCLUSION

There has been a substantial decline in the rate of hospital admissions for childhood asthma after 1989/1990, with major differences between age groups and genders. The decline could be due to improved care of children with asthma or a real reduction in asthma exacerbations.

[Value of routine identification of respiratory infectious agents in children hospitalized with an acute asthma exacerbation]

Introduction

Chez l’enfant les exacerbations d’asthme sont le plus souvent déclenchées par une infection respiratoire. L’objectif de cette étude était d’évaluer l’intérêt de l’identification des pathogènes respiratoires chez les enfants hospitalisés pour une exacerbation d’asthme.

Patients et méthodes

Il s’agit d’une étude rétrospective incluant tout enfant hospitalisé pour une exacerbation d’asthme dans notre unité entre janvier 2010 et décembre 2011 et analysant la prescription des examens microbiologiques, leurs indications, leur rendement, leur impact sur la prise en charge médicale et leur coût.

Résultats

Cent quatre-vingt-dix-sept enfants ont été inclus. Une recherche d’agent pathogène respiratoire avait été réalisée chez 157 enfants (79,7 %), surtout en cas d’infection oto-rhino-laryngologique (ORL), d’hypoxémie ou de pneumonie. Un virus avait été identifié chez 30 (23,8 %) des 126 enfants prélevés. Les analyses bactériologiques avaient eu un rendement faible puisque seulement 3,2 % des analyses par amplification génique (PCR) pour Mycoplasma pneumoniae avaient été positives (n = 4/125). Aucune autre bactérie n’avait été identifiée. Aucun lien n’a pu être établi entre les résultats microbiologiques et la gravité de l’exacerbation. La prise en charge thérapeutique avait été peu modifiée par ces résultats. Le coût global avait été de plus de 40 400 euros pour les 2 ans d’étude.

Conclusion

D’après nos résultats la recherche de pathogènes respiratoires au cours des exacerbations d’asthme a un intérêt modéré en dehors de l’aspect épidémiologique. L’impact du rhinovirus, du coronavirus, du bocavirus et de l’entérovirus, non recherchés en routine hospitalière, reste cependant à préciser.