[Hospital practices and breastfeeding cessation risk within 6 months of delivery]

Implementation of a Regional Standardised Model for Perinatal Electronic Medical Records

Electronic recording of newborn health information contributes to improving the quality of care. Nonetheless, there is limited evidence on the implementation of perinatal electronic medical records models. We describe the development and implementation of an electronic recording model that includes data on the health care provided to both the mother and the newborn, standardised for six hospitals of a regional health care system. The implementation process was developed in 2 stages. During stage 1, the tool was introduced in hospitals to stablish first contact with the healthcare staff. The second stage consisted in designing a new strategy to stabilise the model. Technical issues were fixed, and a new version was drawn up based on multidisciplinary agreement. Indicators to monitor implementation were measured in both stages and compared using the chi-squared test. During stage 1, nearly every newborn got its electronic medical record with an appropriate connection to the mother's data. However, certain forms that were meant to be filled in by staff were frequently neglected (completion rates: 36.7%-55.3%). In stage 2, there was a statistically significant increase in the completion rates of all these forms. As a result, a standardised discharge report was provided to every newborn at the end of stage 2. The PCR model implemented in the Region of Murcia is an innovative example of how the digitalisation and standardisation of data related to the care of healthy newborns at maternity wards is feasible across an entire network of hospitals.

Worldwide prevalence of mother-infant skin-to-skin contact after vaginal birth: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Despite the World Health Organization's (WHO) recommendation for immediate skin-to-skin contact (SSC) after birth, separation of mothers and infants seems to be common practice in many hospitals. It is unknown how common the practice of SSC is worldwide. Therefore, we aimed to determine the reported prevalence of SSC for healthy mothers and infants immediately after normal birth.

METHODS

We systematically searched CINAHL, Medline, ProQuest Central, PubMed and the Cochrane Library for articles published between January 2007 and October 2017 using the keywords "kangaroo care" or "skin to skin contact" or "breastfeeding initiation" or "breast crawl" or "maternal infant contact" or "maternal newborn contact" or "baby friendly hospital initiative" or "ten steps for successful breastfeeding".

RESULTS

After an initial screening of 5266 records, 84 full text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 35 of these met the inclusion criteria. The studies were from 28 countries representing all six WHO world regions. There was a wide range in the practice of SSC for mother-infant dyads around the world: from 1% to 98%. Only 15 studies clearly defined SSC. Most of the studies were from high-income countries, and these reported higher rates of SSC than studies from low and middle-income countries.

CONCLUSION

There was a great heterogeneity in the definition of SSC as well as study designs, which makes cross-county comparison difficult. National studies reporting SSC rates are lacking. Future studies and guidelines to enhance SSC practice should include a standardised set of indicators and measurement tools that document SSC starting time and duration of SSC.

Baby-Friendly Hospital designation has a sustained impact on continued breastfeeding

The Baby‐Friendly Hospital (BFH) Initiative has led to an increase in breastfeeding rates and duration worldwide. But little is known about whether the beneficial effects persist beyond a facility's designation as a BFH. To investigate the association of BFH designation (current, former, and never) and compliance with Baby‐Friendly (BF) practices on breastfeeding in Switzerland, this study combined nationwide survey data on breastfeeding with BFH monitoring data. In this cross‐sectional study, 1,326 children were born in 34 current (N = 508), 28 former (N = 425), and 34 never designated BFHs (N = 393). We compared exclusive and any breastfeeding according to BFH designation over the first year of life, using Kaplan‐Meyer Survival curves. Logistic regression models were applied to analyse breastfeeding prevalence, and Cox‐regression models were used for exclusive (0–6 months) and continued (6–12 months) breastfeeding duration. Average duration of exclusive breastfeeding (13.1 weeks, 95% confidence interval [12.0, 17.4]) and any breastfeeding (32.7 weeks, 95% confidence interval [30.5, 39.2]) were the longest for babies born in currently accredited BFHs. Exclusive breastfeeding was associated with high compliance with monitored BF practices in current BFHs and with the number of BF practices experienced in all hospitals. Continued breastfeeding was significantly longer when babies were born in current BFHs (cessation hazard ratio 0.60, 95% confidence interval [0.42, 0.84]) or in former BFHs (cessation hazard ratio 0.68, 95% confidence interval [0.48, 0.97]). Overall, the results support continued investment into BFHs, because babies born in current BFHs are breastfed the most and the longest, whereas a former BFH designation shows a sustained effect on continued breastfeeding.