1
|
Saelaert M, Mertes H, Moerenhout T, Van Cauwenbergh C, Leroy BP, Devisch I, De Baere E. A qualitative study among patients with an inherited retinal disease on the meaning of genomic unsolicited findings. Sci Rep 2021; 11:15834. [PMID: 34349199 PMCID: PMC8339116 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-95258-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Exome-based testing for genetic diseases can reveal unsolicited findings (UFs), i.e. predispositions for diseases that exceed the diagnostic question. Knowledge of patients’ interpretation of possible UFs and of motives for (not) wanting to know UFs is still limited. This lacking knowledge may impede effective counselling that meets patients’ needs. Therefore, this article examines the meaning of UFs from a patient perspective. A qualitative study was conducted and an interpretative phenomenological analysis was made of 14 interviews with patients with an inherited retinal disease. Patients assign a complex meaning to UFs, including three main components. The first component focuses on result-specific qualities, i.e. the characteristics of an UF (inclusive of actionability, penetrance, severity and age of onset) and the consequences of disclosure; the second component applies to a patient’s lived illness experiences and to the way these contrast with reflections on presymptomatic UFs; the third component addresses a patient’s family embedding and its effect on concerns about disease prognosis and genetic information’s family relevance. The complex meaning structure of UFs suggests the need for counselling procedures that transcend a strictly clinical approach. Counselling should be personalised and consider patients’ lived illness experiences and family context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marlies Saelaert
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Philosophy of Medicine and Ethics Research Group, Ghent University, Campus Heymans (UZ Gent), Corneel Heymanslaan 10 - Building 6K3, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Heidi Mertes
- Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Bioethics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Tania Moerenhout
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Philosophy of Medicine and Ethics Research Group, Ghent University, Campus Heymans (UZ Gent), Corneel Heymanslaan 10 - Building 6K3, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.,Bioethics Centre, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.,Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Caroline Van Cauwenbergh
- Department of Ophthalmology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Head and Skin, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Bart P Leroy
- Department of Ophthalmology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Head and Skin, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Center for Medical Genetics Ghent (CMGG), Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.,Division of Ophthalmology & Center for Cellular & Molecular Therapeutics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ignaas Devisch
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Philosophy of Medicine and Ethics Research Group, Ghent University, Campus Heymans (UZ Gent), Corneel Heymanslaan 10 - Building 6K3, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Elfride De Baere
- Center for Medical Genetics Ghent (CMGG), Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|