Term newborns at risk for early-onset neonatal sepsis: Clinical surveillance versus systematic paraclinical test

Early-onset neonatal sepsis: Effectiveness of classification based on ante- and intrapartum risk factors and clinical monitoring

INTRODUCTION

In 2017, the French public health authority HAS published new guidelines for the management of newborns at risk of early bacterial neonatal infection. These guidelines were based on ante- and intrapartum risk factors and clinical monitoring. In January 2021, we implemented a new protocol based on these guidelines in our tertiary maternity unit.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the impact of the protocol implemented on neonates' antibiotic prescriptions.

METHOD

An "old protocol" group comprising newborns hospitalized between July 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020, was compared to a "new protocol" group formed between January 14, 2021 and July 13, 2021. Data were collected on infectious risk factors, antibiotic prescriptions, and emergency room visits within 2 weeks for an infection or suspected infection.

RESULTS

The "old protocol" population comprised 1565 children and the "new protocol" population 1513. Antibiotic therapy was prescribed for 29 newborns (1.85 %) in the old protocol group versus 15 (0.99 %) in the new one (p = 0.05). The median duration was 5 days and 2 days respectively (p = 0.08). With the new protocol, newborns in category B were about 20 times more likely (p = 0.01), and those in category C about 54 times more likely (p = 0.005) to have an infection than those classified in categories N or A.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that clinical monitoring criteria enable reduced use and duration of antibiotic therapy and are reliable.

Results of a strategy based on clinical observation of newborns at risk of early-onset neonatal sepsis

BACKGROUND

Serial clinical observation of asymptomatic newborns at risk of early-onset sepsis is an alternative option for which there is limited scientific evidence.

AIMS

To evaluate the rate of protocol compliance, the impact on blood tests, percentage of hospitalizations and subsequent procedures, and course of diagnosed early-onset sepsis cases of a protocol based on serial clinical observation.

METHODS

Retrospective observational study comparing an 18-month period under this protocol against a previous protocol based on laboratory tests.

SUBJECTS

6895 asymptomatic newborns with over 35 weeks of gestation.

OUTCOME MEASURES

number of evaluations performed on each subject at risk, percentage of patients undergoing blood draws and hospitalization rates.

RESULTS

Some of the evaluations included in the protocol were omitted in 51.6 % of the newborns undergoing the physical examinations. The implementation of this new approach was associated with a decrease in the percentage of patients undergoing blood draws from 16.8 % to 0.7 % (p < 0.001) with no differences in the progression of the five cases of sepsis studied in each period. The serial clinical observation protocol was associated with a significant increase in hospitalizations for suspected infection, although with no difference in the rate of lumbar punctures performed or antibiotic treatments administered.

CONCLUSION

Compliance with the serial clinical observation protocol can be difficult. This approach often detects newborns with abnormal clinical data that are not explained by early-onset sepsis. Clinical observation is a safe option that minimizes the rate of blood draws.