1
|
Pauwels L, Gooijers J. The Role of the Corpus Callosum (Micro)Structure in Bimanual Coordination: A Literature Review Update. J Mot Behav 2023; 55:525-537. [PMID: 37336516 DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2023.2221985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Abstract
The characterization of callosal white matter is crucial for understanding the relationship between brain structure and bimanual motor function. An earlier literature review established this. With advancements in neuroimaging and data modeling, we aim to provide an update on the existing literature. Firstly, we highlight new CC parcellation approaches, such as functional MRI- and atlas-informed tractography and in vivo histology. Secondly, we elaborate on recent insights into the CC's role in bimanual coordination, drawing evidence from studies on healthy young and older adults, patients and training-related callosal plasticity. We also reflect on progress in the field and propose future perspectives to inspire research on the underlying mechanisms of structural-functional interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Pauwels
- Department of Movement Sciences, KU Leuven, Movement Control and Neuroplasticity Research Group, Leuven, Belgium
- KU Leuven, Leuven Brain Institute, Department of Movement Sciences, Movement control & Neuroplasticity Research Group, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jolien Gooijers
- Department of Movement Sciences, KU Leuven, Movement Control and Neuroplasticity Research Group, Leuven, Belgium
- KU Leuven, Leuven Brain Institute, Department of Movement Sciences, Movement control & Neuroplasticity Research Group, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hildesheim FE, Silver AN, Dominguez-Vargas AU, Andrushko JW, Edwards JD, Dancause N, Thiel A. Predicting Individual Treatment Response to rTMS for Motor Recovery After Stroke: A Review and the CanStim Perspective. FRONTIERS IN REHABILITATION SCIENCES 2022; 3:795335. [PMID: 36188894 PMCID: PMC9397689 DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2022.795335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Background Rehabilitation is critical for reducing stroke-related disability and improving quality-of-life post-stroke. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a non-invasive neuromodulation technique used as stand-alone or adjunct treatment to physiotherapy, may be of benefit for motor recovery in subgroups of stroke patients. The Canadian Platform for Trials in Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation (CanStim) seeks to advance the use of these techniques to improve post-stroke recovery through clinical trials and pre-clinical studies using standardized research protocols. Here, we review existing clinical trials for demographic, clinical, and neurobiological factors which may predict treatment response to identify knowledge gaps which need to be addressed before implementing these parameters for patient stratification in clinical trial protocols. Objective To provide a review of clinical rTMS trials of stroke recovery identifying factors associated with rTMS response in stroke patients with motor deficits and develop research perspectives for pre-clinical and clinical studies. Methods A literature search was performed in PubMed, using the Boolean search terms stroke AND repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation OR rTMS AND motor for studies investigating the use of rTMS for motor recovery in stroke patients at any recovery phase. A total of 1,676 articles were screened by two blinded raters, with 26 papers identified for inclusion in this review. Results Multiple possible factors associated with rTMS response were identified, including stroke location, cortical thickness, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) genotype, initial stroke severity, and several imaging and clinical factors associated with a relatively preserved functional motor network of the ipsilesional hemisphere. Age, sex, and time post-stroke were generally not related to rTMS response. Factors associated with greater response were identified in studies of both excitatory ipsilesional and inhibitory contralesional rTMS. Heterogeneous study designs and contradictory data exemplify the need for greater protocol standardization and high-quality controlled trials. Conclusion Clinical, brain structural and neurobiological factors have been identified as potential predictors for rTMS response in stroke patients with motor impairment. These factors can inform the design of future clinical trials, before being considered for optimization of individual rehabilitation therapy for stroke patients. Pre-clinical models for stroke recovery, specifically developed in a clinical context, may accelerate this process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziska E. Hildesheim
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Canadian Platform for Trials in Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation (CanStim), Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Alexander N. Silver
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Canadian Platform for Trials in Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation (CanStim), Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Adan-Ulises Dominguez-Vargas
- Canadian Platform for Trials in Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation (CanStim), Montréal, QC, Canada
- Centre interdisciplinaire de recherche sur le cerveau et l'apprentissage (CIRCA), Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Département de Neurosciences, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Justin W. Andrushko
- Canadian Platform for Trials in Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation (CanStim), Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jodi D. Edwards
- Canadian Platform for Trials in Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation (CanStim), Montréal, QC, Canada
- University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Numa Dancause
- Canadian Platform for Trials in Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation (CanStim), Montréal, QC, Canada
- Centre interdisciplinaire de recherche sur le cerveau et l'apprentissage (CIRCA), Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Département de Neurosciences, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Alexander Thiel
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Canadian Platform for Trials in Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation (CanStim), Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
- *Correspondence: Alexander Thiel
| |
Collapse
|