Trochanteric impingement: is it a source of pain after THR?

Technical Considerations and Avoiding Complications in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is considered to be the surgical procedure of the 20th century. Current projections show that by 2030, primary THA is expected to grow by 171%, with revision THA expected to increase by 142% in the same time frame. Although complications are not common, when they occur, they can cause notable morbidity to the patient. Understanding the unique anatomy and needs of each patient will prepare the surgeon to avoid soft-tissue or bony injury, optimize prosthesis placement, and decrease the risk of infection. This article aims to highlight common causes of early revision THA and provide specific technical strategies to avoid these complications. Following a systematic approach to the primary THA and using these techniques will assist the surgeon in avoiding complications to revision hip arthroplasty.

Incidence of and Risk Factors for Lateral Trochanteric Pain After Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty

Lateral trochanteric pain (LTP) is a common complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The goals of this study were to report the incidence of LTP after direct anterior approach (DAA) THA, describe the treatment course and outcomes, and examine patient-specific and implant-related potential risk factors. A retrospective review identified patients who underwent primary DAA THA with at least 1-year follow-up. Postoperative functional outcome scores and LTP occurrence were recorded. Patient demographics, surgical indications, implant characteristics, medical comorbidities, and radiographic parameters were obtained. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors. A total of 610 THA procedures were performed for 563 patients (mean follow-up, 30.9±15.2 months). The overall incidence of LTP was 11.6%. All cases of LTP were successfully treated conservatively, although these patients, compared with patients who did not have postoperative LTP, experienced significantly lower functional outcome scores (Harris Hip Score, 96.6±4.7 [range, 55-100] vs 89.9±8.5 [range, 42-100], respectively; P<.001). Logistic regression analysis identified female sex (odds ratio, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.32-4.02), diabetes mellitus (odds ratio, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.11-4.88), hypertension (odds ratio, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.15-3.28), and the use of an offset acetabular liner (odds ratio, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.06-5.91) as independent risk factors for LTP. There was no correlation between LTP and radiographic parameters. The incidence of LTP after DAA THA is similar to reported rates for other THA surgical approaches. Female sex, medical comorbidities, and the use of offset acetabular liners are likely associated, and patients should be counseled appropriately. Postoperative LTP results in worse functional outcomes, although all cases can be treated conservatively. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(2):e79-e85.].

Soft-Tissue Balancing in Total Hip Arthroplasty

»

Appropriate total hip arthroplasty (THA) reconstruction must simultaneously address component position, restoration of biomechanics, and soft-tissue balance.

»

Preoperative planning for complex THA cases should include radiographic templating, a detailed case plan that contains backup implant options, and a thorough understanding of the patient's preoperative examination.

»

Using a systematic approach to soft-tissue balancing in THA enhances the ability to intraoperatively execute the preoperative plan.

»

In patients with preexisting deformities (e.g., dysplasia or prior surgery), increased attention to abductor function is necessary when assessing acetabular component placement and offset.

The use of pelvic radiographs as a predictor for gluteal tendinopathy and bursitis

AIM

To evaluate the relationship between radiographic measurements of the hip and sonographic evidence of gluteal tendinopathy and bursitis in patients with lateral hip pain.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with lateral hip pain referred for ultrasound of the hip in our institution over a 5-year period were identified. Findings of gluteal tendinopathy and subgluteal or trochanteric bursitis on ultrasound were recorded. Radiographs of the hip were also evaluated and femoral offset (FO), global offset (GO), abductor lever arm (ALA) and trochanteric impingement distance (TID) were recorded. The mean of each measurement was compared between patients with gluteal tendinopathy and subgluteal or trochanteric bursitis.

RESULTS

273 patients were included in the study. 107 patients (39.2%) had a THA. In the asymptomatic hip, a range of normal measurements were obtained: FO 22.4-76.5 mm, GO 40.1-116.1 mm, ALA 45.0-98.4 mm and TID 13.8-63.1 mm. In the native hip and post THA, there was no statistically significant relationship between FO, GO, ALA and TID in patients with gluteal tendinopathy or trochanteric or subgluteal bursitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Lateral hip pain is a common presenting complaint in patients with hip pain and is reported in a small proportion of patients post THA. No statistically significant relationship was found between radiographic measurements and ultrasound findings in our patient cohort. However, we describe the range of measurements obtained from the normal asymptomatic hip in this large cohort of patients, which may aid in the evaluation and management of patients with lateral hip pain.

Determining and Achieving Target Limb Length and Offset in Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Intraoperative Digital Radiography

BACKGROUND

Achieving appropriate limb length and offset in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is challenging. Target limb length and offset may not always mean equal radiographic measurements bilaterally. The goal of this study is to introduce a method for determining as well as achieving target limb length and offset using digital radiographic measurements.

METHODS

One hundred and two consecutive patients with unilateral hip osteoarthritis undergoing primary THA in the lateral decubitus position were included. Limb length and offset were measured on anterior-posterior pelvic radiographs preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively. Offset was defined as the length of a line parallel to the inter-teardrop line, extending from the edge of the ischium, at about the lower border of the ipsilateral obturator foramen, to the edge of the femoral cortex, usually at, or just below, the neck resection level. Target limb length was determined for each patient based on patient perception and severity of disease. Target offset equaled the contralateral limb. Using intraoperative digital radiography, adjustments were made until targets were achieved and the hip was stable. Patients were followed for an average of 4.2 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

Limb length was within 5 mm of target measurements in 100% of patients and offset was within 5 mm of targets in 97.1%. Target measurements differed by >5 mm from the contralateral side in 2.0% of limb length and 2.9% of offset measurements. There were no significant differences between intraoperative and postoperative limb length (P = .261) or offset (P = .747) measurements. At final follow-up, there were no dislocations or reoperations and average Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement was 95.78.

CONCLUSION

Target limb length and offset goals can be determined for most patients undergoing THA. Targets are not always equal to the contralateral side. Intraoperative digital radiography can allow surgeons to accurately achieve target limb length and offset to within 5 mm in a homogenous cohort of patients with unilateral hip osteoarthritis with excellent clinical outcomes.

[Revision total hip arthroplasty : Significance of instability, impingement, offset and gluteal insufficiency]

BACKGROUND

Instability is a common cause of failure in primary and, especially, revision total hip arthroplasty. The reasons for instability include implant malpositioning, impingement, inadequate offset reconstruction, and gluteal insufficiency. Impingement following THA and revision THA is divided into prosthetic and bony impingement, and in addition to instability also causes pain in the area of the hip joint. Offset reconstruction during revision THA is of particular biomechanical importance, since insufficient reconstruction leads not only to instability and pain but also to dislocation. Abductor deficiency often occurs after revision THA and leads to a change in gait pattern, instability and pain.

AIM

Current diagnostic and treatment procedures for instability, impingement, insufficient offset reconstruction and abductor deficiency after THA and revision THA are summarized.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Diagnosis of an instable THA and painful THA includes patient history, physical examination and medical imaging. Thus, in almost all cases, the cause can be determined and treated. Dislocation after primary THA in the early postoperative period can often be treated conservatively if accurate component placement is observed, while a late-onset and recurrent dislocation after primary and revision THA usually needs surgical procedures. To avoid bony and prosthetic THA impingement intraoperative control is absolutely necessary. If possible, the offset reconstruction is based on the condition of the native hip joint and can be achieved by using modular prostheses, neck adapters and different head lengths. Abductor deficiency also occurs frequently after revision THA and can be treated surgically if severe clinical symptoms and fatty degeneration of the abductors have been diagnosed.