Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes after Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Two Specialized Surgical Tables

Does Surgical Approach to the Hip Play a Role in Same-Day Discharge Outcomes?

BACKGROUND

Different approaches for total hip arthroplasty (THA) may offer advantages in regard to achieving same-day-discharge (SDD) success.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent elective primary THA from 2015 to 2020 who were formally enrolled in a single institution's SDD program. A total of 1,127 and 207 patients underwent THA via direct anterior approach and posterior approach, respectively, were included. Cohorts were assigned based on approach. The primary outcome was failure-to-launch, defined as hospital stay extending past 1 midnight. Secondary outcomes included Forgotten Joint Score-12, Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, 90-day readmission and revision rate, and surgical time. Patient-reported outcomes were collected at 3 and 12 months.

RESULTS

After controlling for demographic differences, posterior approach patients had higher rates of failure-to-launch (12.1% versus 5.9%, P = .002) and longer surgical times (99 versus 80 minutes; P < .001) compared to direct anterior approach patients. The cohorts had similar readmission (1.7% versus 1.4%; P = .64) and revision rates (1% versus 1%; P = .88). The magnitude of improvement in Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement scores from preoperative to 12 months was similar between cohorts (35.3 versus 34.5; P = .42). The differences in outcome scores between cohorts at each time point were not considered clinically significant.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis suggests that patient selection and surgical approach may be important for achieving SDD. Surgical approach did not significantly impact readmission or revision rates nor did it have a meaningful impact on patient-reported outcomes in the first year after surgery.

Superior Transverse Atraumatic Reconstruction (STAR) approach provides a better-compared outcome to standard Direct Superior Approach (DSA): a matched, prospective comparative single-surgeon study

INTRODUCTION

The Direct Superior Approach (DSA) is a muscle-sparing hip approach that does not protect the piriformis and the other short external rotators. We present a DSA modification we named STAR (Superior Transverse Atraumatic Reconstruction), which has DSA advantages but always preserves piriformis. Our study compared the early postoperative, radiological, and functional results of patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) through the STAR approach with a matched DSA group performed by a senior surgeon.

METHODS

Each group, DSA, and STAR included 200 elective primary unilateral THAs performed by the surgeon between 2016-2017 and 2020-2021, respectively. Patients were included in both groups using the same inclusion criteria. Both groups were matched for age and sex. The same postoperative pain management, chemoprophylaxis, and physiotherapy protocols were followed in both groups. Two independent orthopaedic surgeons performed the clinical and radiological follow-up.

RESULTS

The STAR group had significantly lower mean incision length (p = 0.042) and hospital stay (p = 0.002) than the DSA group. The mean intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.085) and the need for blood transfusion (p = 0.228) were less for the STAR than the DSA group. The mean postoperative functional scores improvement was significantly higher for the STAR than the DSA group at the end of the first and third postoperative months.

CONCLUSIONS

The STAR approach offers earlier functional improvement, shorter hospital stay and less transfusion need than DSA for patients undergoing primary THA. Both approaches showed a limited complication risk and an outstanding acetabular and femoral access enabling the procedure.

Earlier functional recovery and discharge from hospital for THA patients operated on via direct superior compared to standard posterior approach: a retrospective frequency-matched case-control study

BACKGROUND

The direct superior hip approach (DSA) has been less researched than other approaches in the literature. We retrospectively compared the early postoperative and functional outcomes of patients with hip osteoarthritis undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) via DSA with a matched control group using a standard posterior approach (SPA).

METHODS

The DSA group comprised 100 THAs performed via DSA by a senior surgeon between January 2018 and May 2019. Patients with primary osteoarthritis and ASA score ⩽3 who were eligible for surgery were included. The DSA group was compared to a matched cohort of 100 patients operated on with a SPA in the same period by another chief surgeon. Patients were matched for age, sex, and ASA score. All patients received the same postoperative chemoprophylaxis, pain management and physiotherapy. 2 independent attending arthroplasty surgeons assessed the incision length, operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, and complications. VAS, HHS, and HOOS scores were also evaluated for a year postoperatively.

RESULTS

Mean incision length and hospital stay were significantly lower in the DSA group. DSA patients had non-significantly lower intraoperative blood loss, transfusion needs, and postoperative pain than SPA patients. Mean operation time and complication rate did not differ between groups. The DSA group demonstrated significantly greater functional scores than the SPA group at the first postoperative month. No differences in scores were recorded following the third month.

CONCLUSIONS

The DSA approach may provide earlier functional recovery and hospital discharge for THA patients compared with SPA. DSA was equivalent to SPA concerning pain and blood loss, showing minimal complication rates.