The Effect of Different Irrigation Solutions on the Cytotoxicity and Recovery Potential of Human Osteoblast Cells In Vitro

Efficacy of Commercially Available Irrigation Solutions on Removal of Staphylococcus Aureus and Biofilm From Porous Titanium Implants: An In Vitro Study

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic joint infection remains a major problem. The bactericidal efficacy of commercial irrigation solutions for the treatment of infection is not well established in the presence of porous titanium (Ti) implants. This study compared the in vitro efficacy of five irrigation solutions on infected three-dimensional-printed porous Ti discs.

METHODS

Titanium discs (2 × 4 mm, 400, 700, and 1,000 μm) were infected with S. aureus (1 × 106 colony-forming unit/mL) and incubated for 3 hours or 3 days to create acute or chronic infection with biofilm. Discs were irrigated with saline, antibiotic, or antiseptic solutions, then repeatedly sonicated. Sonicates were cultured for bacterial quantification. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey-Kramer post hoc testing (P < .05 significance). Biofilms were visualized by scanning electron microscopy.

RESULTS

Saline irrigation was ineffective in both groups. In acute infections with 400 μm pores, differences were found with saline versus solution #3 (P = .015) and #4 (P = .015). Solution #4 had the lowest bacterial counts for all pore sizes. For biofilm, irrigation with saline, solutions #1, #2, and #3 inadequately cleared bacteria in all pore sizes. Lower remaining concentrations were observed in #4 with 400μm pores compared to saline (P = .06) and #2 (P = .039). The scanning electron microscopy showed a reduction of biofilm in samples washed with #4.

CONCLUSIONS

Irrigation of infected porous Ti discs with saline, solutions #1 and #2 failed to reduce the bacterial load. The 400 μm discs consistently had more bacteria despite irrigation, highlighting the difficulty of removing bacteria from small pores. Solutions #3 and #4 reduced bacteria acutely, but only #4 demonstrated efficacy in clearing biofilm compared to saline. These results should be considered when treating periprosthetic joint infection in the presence of porous components and the potential presence of biofilm.

Effect of Commercially Available Wound Irrigation Solutions on Uninfected Host Tissue in a Murine Model

Background

Commercially available irrigation solutions are used to reduce bacterial contamination and prevent surgical site infections. However, the effect of these solutions on the healing capacity of tissue has not been well-established. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of 5 commercially available irrigation solutions on host tissue in a murine model.

Methods

There were 5 treatment groups: bacitracin, Clorpactin, Irrisept, Prontosan, Bactisure, and normal saline control. The irrigation solutions were applied to the wound for 30 seconds or 1 minute, as per the manufacturer's instructions, and then washed with normal saline. Mice were sacrificed at 3 days and 10 days. The tissue was examined histologically for inflammation, edema, granulation tissue formation, and re-epithelialization. Granulation tissue formation and re-epithelialization were surrogates for effective wound healing.

Results

All of the irrigation solutions had negative effects on host tissue in the acute phase. The inflammation and edema were improved in the later phase (10 days). Recovery and healing of the open wounds were observed for all groups at 10 days. The antiseptic irrigation solutions had similar cytotoxic effects on host tissue at 3 days and did not have delayed or compromised wound healing at 10 days when compared to normal saline control.

Conclusions

Single short-duration use of these commercially available antiseptic irrigation solutions appears to be safe in an uninfected wound. Data from this study will provide surgeons with useful information regarding the safety of using antiseptic wound irrigation solutions intraoperatively for prevention of surgical site infections.

Irrigation Solutions Negatively Affect the Viability and Function of Human Fibroblasts: An in vitro Study

Introduction

Multiple irrigation solutions are used in orthopedic surgeries although there are limited studies on their lasting effects on human tissues. The purpose of this work was to investigate the cytotoxic effects of the irrigation solutions Bacitracin, Clorpactin (sodium oxychlorosene), Irrisept (0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate), and Bactisure (ethanol 1%, acetic acid 0.6%, sodium acetate 0.2%, benzalkonium chloride 0.013%, and water) on 3D cultures of human fibroblasts.

Methods

Two independent experiments with 6 replicates were performed for the following conditions: Control (saline), bacitracin, Clorpactin, Irrisept, and Bactisure. Human fibroblast cell sheets were exposed to these solutions (1 or 2 min), followed by three washes with warm saline. Cell sheets were then cultured for additional 5- and 7-day posttreatment. Cell viability was measured using the alamarBlue (AB) assay. The more cytotoxic the irrigant, the lower the AB reduction.

Results

For 1-min exposure time, significant differences in AB reduction were noted in Clorpactin, Irrisept, and Bactisure groups compared to control at both 5 days (Clorpactin p = 0.0003, Irrisept p = 7.31 × 10^-15, Bactisure p = 6.86 × 10^-14) and 7 days posttreatment (all groups p < 0.0001). The results were similar in the 2-min exposure groups. Bacitracin-treated fibroblasts displayed no significant difference at all measurement times compared to control.

Discussion

Impacts of irrigation solution exposure on cell viability were varied. Irrisept and Bactisure showed the highest cell toxicity even after a brief exposure (1 min), while bacitracin and Clor-pactin exposure showed smaller impacts on cell viability as compared to saline controls. This in vitro study provided insight into the effects of the irrigants on human cells and provides the groundwork essential to move to in vivo studies. Our findings raised the concern that some irrigation solutions may have negative impacts on wound healing and healthy cellular response.

Common Wound Irrigation Solutions Produce Different Responses in Infected vs Sterile Host Tissue: Murine Air Pouch Infection Model

Background

Despite desirable microbicidal actions of irrigation solutions in surgical site infection treatment, several studies demonstrate potential cytotoxic effects. This study investigated tissue damage caused by irrigation solutions in the presence or absence of infection.

Methods

Air pouches were created in 60 mice and evenly divided into 2 groups as infected with Staphylococcus aureus and control. Groups were then subdivided both by type of solution and by timing after irrigation. Solutions included control (0.9% saline), bacitracin (33 IU/ml), 0.2% sodium oxychlorosene, 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate, and 0.013% benzalkonium chloride.

Results

Inflammation decreased in infected pouches compared to the sterile ones for all solutions except bacitracin on day 0 and for all on day 7. On day 0, infected pouches had increased necrosis with bacitracin (P = .006), chlorhexidine gluconate (P = .18), and benzalkonium chloride (P = .07); on day 7, there was decreased necrosis in infected pouches for all solutions (P < .05) except for sodium oxychlorosene (P = .18). Edema decreased in infected pouches on day 0 for all solutions. On day 7, infected pouches had decreased edema with 0.9% saline, bacitracin, and benzalkonium chloride (P < .05) and increased edema with chlorhexidine gluconate (P < .05) and sodium oxychlorosene (P = .069). Bacitracin allowed for more bacteria growth than sodium oxychlorosene (P = .024), chlorhexidine gluconate (P = .025), and benzalkonium chloride (P = .025).

Conclusions

The presence of bacteria led to less immediate tissue inflammation and edema, while tissue necrosis varied over time. The current study may guide surgeons on which solution to use and whether to irrigate a possibly sterile wound or joint.

A Novel Irrigant to Eliminate Planktonic Bacteria and Eradicate Biofilm Superstructure With Persistent Effect During Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have examined the use of topical and irrigation-related adjuvants to decrease the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total hip arthroplasty. Many issues related to their use remain to be investigated. These include cost, antibiotic stewardship, bactericidal effect on planktonic bacteria, host cytotoxicity, necessity to irrigate/dilute potentially cytotoxic agents after their application, and impact on biofilm.

METHODS

Bacterial strains of microorganisms were grown in optimal medium. After the growth phase, the organisms were exposed to the novel irrigation solution (XPerience) or phosphate buffer solution (PBS) for 5 minutes before a neutralizing broth was added. The colony-forming units per milliliter and the log reduction in colony-forming units in the treated sample vs the control were then determined. Subsequently, biofilms of microorganisms were grown on hydroxyapatite-coated glass slides. Each slide was then exposed to irrigation solutions for various contact times. Biofilm quantification was performed and the log10 density of each organism was obtained.

RESULTS

In vitro testing of the irrigant demonstrated 6-log reductions in planktonic bacteria in 5 minutes, and 4-log to 8-log reductions in biofilms. Laboratory tissue testing has demonstrated minimal cytotoxic effects to host tissue allowing for solution to remain in contact with the host without need for subsequent irrigation, creating a barrier to biofilm for up to 5 hours after its application.

CONCLUSION

This novel irrigant demonstrates high efficacy against both planktonic bacteria and bacterial biofilms in laboratory testing. Large series in vivo data are necessary to further establish its efficacy in reducing primary and recurrent surgical site infections.

The Effects of Three Chlorhexidine-Based Mouthwashes on Human Osteoblast-Like SaOS-2 Cells. An In Vitro Study

Several decontamination methods for removing biofilm from implant surfaces during surgical peri-implantitis treatment have been reported, including the intraoperative usage of chlorhexidine (CHX)-based antiseptics. There is a lack of information on possible adverse effects on bone healing. The study aimed to examine the impact of three CHX-based mouthwashes on osteoblast-like cells (SaOS-2) in vitro. Cells were cultured for three days in 96-well binding plates. Each well was randomly treated for either 30, 60 or 120 s with 0.05% CHX combined with 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC), 0.1% CHX, 0.2% CHX or sterile saline (NaCl) as control. Cell viability, cytotoxicity and apoptosis were assessed at day 0, 3 and 6. Cell viability resulted in being higher in the control group at all time points. At day 0, the CHX 0.2 group showed significantly higher cytotoxicity values compared to CHX 0.1 (30 s), CHX + CPC (30 s, 60 s and 120 s) and control (60 s and 120 s), while no significant differences were identified between CHX + CPC and both CHX 0.1 and NaCl groups. All test mouthwashes were found to induce apoptosis to a lower extent compared to control. Results indicate that 0.2% CHX presented the highest cytotoxic effect. Therefore, its intraoperative use should be carefully considered.