Discrepancy in the Responsiveness to Hip Range of Motion Between Harris and Oxford Hip Scores

What are the differences in the recovery of physical function and clinical score between patients with steroid-related osteonecrosis of the femoral head and hip osteoarthritis undergoing total hip arthroplasty? A propensity score-matched study

PURPOSE

Steroid-related osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH), arising from steroid administration for underlying diseases, represents a unique pathology for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and typically affects a younger demographic compared to osteoarthritis (OA). Given the significant age-related differences, this study aims to employ propensity score matching to align patient backgrounds between these two diseases and compare physical function. Additionally, our objective is to scrutinize the patterns of clinical score recovery over the course of one year following THA.

METHODS

Using propensity score matching, 29 patients each with steroid-related ONFH and OA were selected. Muscle strength (hip abductor and knee extensor) were assessed before and after THA. Additionally, recovery of the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Oxford Hip Score (OHS) up to one year postoperatively was analyzed.

RESULTS

The steroid-related ONFH group exhibited gender bias and significantly younger age compared to the OA group. Propensity score matching achieved balanced patient backgrounds. Physical function showed trends of lower hip abduction and knee extensor strength on the operative side in the steroid-related ONFH group. Notably, nonoperative knee extensor strength decreased significantly after matching. HHS and OHS were poor in steroid-related ONFH up to three months postoperatively but recovered after six months.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with steroid-related ONFH experience positive outcomes in clinical score following THA. Propensity score matching effectively identified muscle weakness on both operative and nonoperative sides, highlighting its utility in comparative analyses.

The relationship between spino-pelvic-hip mobility and quality of life before and after total hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) can significantly improve quality of life (QOL) in patients with hip osteoarthritis. A relationship exists between activity levels and postoperative QOL, but its determinants are not well known. The aim of this work was to investigate the relationship between hip, pelvis and lumbar spine mobility and alignment before and after THA with QOL.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Consecutive patients with hip arthrosis and an indication for THA were included prospectively between July 2019 and December 2020, and they underwent lateral radiographs in free-standing, extension, relaxed- and flexed-seated position. Spinopelvic and hip parameters were measured, as well as their changes between positions to assess hip, pelvis and lumbar spine mobility. Patients were also administered QOL questionnaires. Data were collected preoperatively and 6 and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Seventy patients were included; QOL significantly increased 6 months after THA (from 18 [10; 27] to 61 [48; 72], p < 0.001). QOL further increased by 10 points or more after 6 months in 18% of patients, while it decreased in 16%. The latter showed higher pelvic range of motion (between flexion and extension) than the former.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed that QOL is significantly improved by THA, and that spinopelvic alignment and function can play a role. Future work should elucidate how to better predict postoperative QOL from preoperative patient characteristics to improve patient treatment and establish early postoperative physical therapy for patients who could benefit from postoperative improvement of activity-related QOL.

Operative choice for subtrochanteric femoral fracture in school-aged children: Triple elastic stable intramedullary nail versus locking plate

BACKGROUND

The management strategy of subtrochanteric fractures remains controversial, and triple elastic stable intramedullary nail (ESIN) has not been reported for pediatric subtrochanteric fractures. This study aimed to compare the clinical effects of treating school-aged children with subtrochanteric fractures with triple ESINs versus locking plates.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of pediatric patients with subtrochanteric femoral fracture receiving either triple ESINs (TE) or locking plates (LPs) between January 2010 and January 2018. Sixteen patients in each group with matched age, sex, and fracture characteristics were included in the study. The preoperative data, including baseline information of the patients, fracture pattern, and types of surgical procedure, were collected from the hospital database. Patients were followed-up at the outpatient clinic in the 3rd month, 6th month, 12th month, and annually afterward. Hardware removal was performed at 9 - 18 months after the primary surgery.

RESULTS

In all, 16 patients (8.4 ± 1.5-year-old, 7 boys, 9 girls) in the TE group and 16 patients (8.4 ± 1.4-year-old, 7 boys, 9 girls) in the LP group were included. There was significantly less operative time, reduced estimated blood loss, and shortened hospital stay for the TE as compared with the LP (P < 0.001). However, higher fluoroscopy frequency was observed in the TE group than in the LP group (P < 0.001). The time to union was faster in the TE group than in the LP group (P = 0.031). However, the angulation was higher in the TE group (3.2 ± 0.6) than the LP group (1.8 ± 0.5), and the incidence of implant prominence was higher in the TE group (7/16, 43.8%) than the LP group (1/16, 6.3%).

CONCLUSION

Compared with the locking plates, triple ESINs demonstrated significantly less operative time, reduced estimated blood loss, and shortened hospital stay. Besides, both TE and LP groups produced satisfactory outcomes in school-aged children with subtrochanteric fractures. Therefore, TE remains a feasible choice for subtrochanteric fractures in school-aged children.