Long-Term Results of Delta Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty

Two-Year Results of Ceramic-on-Ceramic Hip Resurfacing in an International Multicenter Cohort

BACKGROUND

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) is a bone-conserving alternative to total hip arthroplasty. We present the 2-year clinical and radiographic follow-up of a novel ceramic-on-ceramic HRA in an international multicenter cohort.

METHODS

Patients undergoing HRA between September 2018 and January 2021 were prospectively included. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the form of the Forgotten Joint Score, Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr., Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, Oxford Hip Score, and University of California, Los Angeles, Activity Score were collected preoperatively, and at 1 and 2 years postoperation. Serial radiographs were assessed for migration, component alignment, evidence of osteolysis or loosening, and heterotopic ossification formation.

RESULTS

The study identified 200 patients who reached a minimum 2-year follow-up (mean 3.5 years). Of these, 185 completed PROMs follow-up at 2 years. There was a significant improvement in Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (P < .001) and Oxford Hip Score (P < .001) between the preoperative, 1-year, and 2-year outcomes. Patients had improved activity scores on the University of California, Los Angeles, Active Score (P < .001), with 45% reporting a return to high-impact activity at 2 years. At 1 and 2 years, the Forgotten Joint Score was not significantly different (P = .38). There was no migration, osteolysis, or loosening of any of the implants. No fractures were reported over the 2-year follow-up, with only 1 patient reporting a sciatic nerve palsy. There were 2 revisions, 1 for unexplained pain at 3 months due to acetabular component malposition and 1 at 33.5 months for acetabular implant failure.

CONCLUSIONS

The ceramic-on-ceramic resurfacing at 2 years postoperation demonstrates promising results with satisfactory outcomes in all recorded PROMs. Further long-term data are needed to support the widespread adoption of this prosthesis as an alternative to other HRA bearings.

Predictors of Reoperation and Survival Experience (Minimum 1 Year) for Primary Versus Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty in Young Patients

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty (THA), including primary and conversion procedures, is commonly used for many types of joint disease in patients aged below 65 years, though few studies have evaluated THA outcomes in young patients (≤ 40 years old). This study examined a large cohort of patients who underwent THA at a young (≤ 40 years old) age to identify predictors of reoperation and compare survivorship between primary and conversion THAs.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on 497 patients who underwent 612 primary and conversion THAs at 40 years old or younger between 1990 and 2020. Medical records were reviewed to collect patient/surgical data. A multivariable logistic regression model identified independent predictors of reoperation, and Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank tests was used to compare survival curves by THA type.

RESULTS

The median age at surgery (interquartile range) was 31 years (25 to 36). The median follow-up time was 6.6 years (range, 3.8 to 10.5). Conversion THAs had an increased rate of both revisions (12.3 versus 5.6%, P = 0.02) and nonrevision reoperations (8.9 versus 3.2%, P = 0.03) compared to primary THAs. A ceramic-on-ceramic articulation (odds ratio: 5.17; P = 0.03) and a higher estimated blood loss (odds ratio: 1.0007; P = 0.03) were independent predictors of reoperation for primary and conversion THA, respectively. Conversion THAs had a lower 15-year survival (77.8 versus 90.8%, P = 0.009) compared to primary THAs.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients ≤ 40 years old who underwent primary and conversion THAs demonstrated an impressive 15-year survival comparable to that of older populations (74 to 93%), while conversion procedures had a higher reoperation rate. Although primary THA may be more ideal, there are promising outcomes for patients who need THA at a younger age than typically implemented, especially for those who are very young (≤ 30 years old).

Bearing-Related Complications of Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Fourth-Generation Ceramic-On-Ceramic Articulations: Does Articular Noise Increase Over Time?

BACKGROUND

We previously reported the mean 6-year outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) using fourth-generation ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) articulations. With extended observations, this study aimed to report the mean 12-year outcomes focusing on bearing-related complications of CoC THA.

METHODS

We reviewed primary CoC THAs performed between May 2009 and April 2012 at a single institution. Of the 831 hips (739 patients), 716 hips (635 patients) that satisfied a minimum 10-year follow-up were included. The mean age at operation was 54 years (range, 16 to 83). The occurrence of bearing-specific complications, including ceramic fractures and noise generation, was evaluated. The mean follow-up duration was 12 years (range, 10 to 14).

RESULTS

A total of 2 (0.3%) ceramic liner fractures occurred, as previously reported. No additional ceramic fractures were observed during the extended follow-up period. However, the cumulative incidence of audible noise increased from 6.4 (48 of 749) to 8.2% (59 of 716). Of the 59 hips with noise, 26 (44.1%) developed noise within 1 year, whereas 13 (22.0%) presented with noise more than 5 years after THA. The noise was described as clicking in 35 hips (4.9%) and as squeaking in 24 hips (3.4%). No revision surgeries were performed for noise, except in 2 cases of concomitant liner fractures. The implant survivorship free of any revision was 98.1% at 12 years.

CONCLUSIONS

No additional ceramic fractures were identified in this extension study at a minimum follow-up of 10 years. However, the prevalence of articular noise has increased from 6.4 to 8.2% since the previous report. Possible late-onset noise should be considered when performing CoC THA in younger patients.

Age, activity, and native femoral offset are associated with articular noise in ceramic on ceramic total hip arthroplasty (THA) with custom stems

PURPOSE

To report the prevalence of articular noise following total hip arthroplasty (THA) with custom stems and ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings, to determine the risk factors for articular noise, and the effect of articular noise on quality of life (QoL).

METHODS

A consecutive series of uncemented primary THAs using custom stems implanted between 01/02/ 2014-01/04/2017 were evaluated. The cohort comprised 479 patients (529 hips, 301 males and 228 females), aged 55.9 ± 11.6 with a BMI of 25.8 ± 4.3 kg/m2. Postoperative assessment included Oxford hip score (OHS), forgotten joint score (FJS), and a dedicated questionnaire on articular noise. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise the data. Regression analyses were performed to study factors associated with presence of noise.

RESULTS

At a minimum follow-up of five years, 431 patients (476 hips) were available for postoperative assessment. OHS was 45.3 ± 6.1, FJS was 83.6 ± 24.7, and 69 patients (71 hips, 15%) reported articular noise. The impact of noise on QoL was 1.4 ± 2.1. Multivariable analyses confirmed that the presence of articular noise was associated with younger age (OR,0.95; 95%CI,0.93-0.97; p < 0.001), smaller native femoral offset (OR, 0.95; 95%CI,0.90-1.00;p = 0.034), as well as intense (OR, 3.15; 95%CI, 1.15-9.79; p = 0.033) and very intense physical activity (OR, 4.71; 95%CI, 1.52-16.15; p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of articular noise following primary THA with custom stems and CoC bearings was 15%, but the impact of noise on QoL was minimal for most patients. Younger, highly active patients should be advised of an increased likelihood of noise from CoC THA, particularly if they have low native femoral offset on preoperative imaging.

Mid to long-term survivorship of hip arthroplasty in patients 40 years and younger

BACKGROUND

Etiology of hip osteoarthritis (OA) and survival of hip arthroplasty in the young (below 40-years-old) remains poorly described. Furthermore, joint survivorship mid to long-term and PROMs according to the etiology are unclear. The study aims were to 1) identify the indications for arthroplasty in the below 40-years-old cohort; 2) define hip arthroplasty outcomes in the young and 3) test whether patients with sequelae of pediatrics hip disease have inferior outcome compared to other patients.

HYPOTHESIS

Our hypothesis was that hip arthroplasty is a viable option for managing hip disease in patients under 40, with excellent survival rates and outcomes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is an IRB approved, retrospective, consecutive, multi-surgeon, cohort study from a single academic center. Indication for hip arthroplasty of 346 patients (410 hips) below 40-years-old were studied; 239 underwent THA (58%) and 171 hip resurfacing (42%). Patient, surgical and implant factors were tested for association with implant survivorship and functional outcome for hip arthroplasty performed with a follow-up of more than two years. Pediatric hip sequelae patients were compared for survival and PROMs with the rest of the cohort.

RESULTS

The most common etiology of OA was FAI (47%), followed by pediatric hip sequelae (18%). The 10-year survivorship was 97.2% ± 1.2, mean OHS was 45.1 ± 6.3 and mean HHS was 93.4 ± 12.6. The pediatric hip sequelae subgroup demonstrated no differences in 10-year survivorship and better PROMs compared to rest (OHS: 46.6 ± 3.8; HHS: 96.0 ± 8.5).

DISCUSSION

The most common aetiologies amongst the young with hip OA is FAI and pediatric hip sequelae. Hip arthroplasty in the young presents excellent 10-year survivorship and PROMs. Excellent survival and PROMs in the young with pediatric hip sequelae provide important information for decision-making in this challenging population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; retrospective cohort study.

Excellent Results of Large-Diameter Ceramic-On-Ceramic Bearings in Total Hip Arthroplasty at Minimum Ten-Year Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

This study reports the minimum 10 years results of total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed using a monoblock acetabular component with a large-diameter head ceramic-on-ceramic bearing.

METHODS

Of the 276 THAs included in this study, there were eleven deaths and 27 patients lost to follow up (11%) during the follow-up, leaving 237 (85%) hips available for review at a mean of 10.5 years (range, 10 to 12) postoperatively. Reoperations, implant revisions, adverse events, clinical outcomes, radiographic evaluation, and whole blood metal ion levels were assessed at the last follow-up.

RESULTS

After a minimum of 10 years, implant survivorship was 98.7%. There were 3 revisions (1.3%): one for insufficient acetabular cup primary fixation, one traumatic periprosthetic acetabular fracture, and one probable deep chronic infection. No dislocation or ceramic implant fracture was observed. The mean University of California at Los Angeles activity score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score, and Forgotten Joint Score were 5.6 (2 to 10), 90.1 (9 to 100), and 79.2 (4 to 100), respectively. All patients (100%) were satisfied or very satisfied. Since implantation, 43% of patients reported hearing a squeaking noise from the prosthesis. But all patients who reported squeaking were satisfied with the surgery. The mean titanium level was 2.2 μg/L (1.1 to 5.6). No progressive radiolucent lines, osteolysis, or implant loosening signs were observed at the last radiographic evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

A large-diameter head ceramic-on-ceramic THA provides outstanding long-term (minimum 10 years) implant survivorship with unrestricted activity while avoiding implant impingement, liner fracture, and hip instability. Functional outcomes, satisfaction, and joint perception were excellent. Although the incidence of squeaking was high, it did not affect patient satisfaction or function. The systemic titanium levels were low, related to unavoidable passive corrosion of implant surfaces, and did not reveal any indirect signs of trunnionosis.

Wear, Osteolysis, and Aseptic Loosening Following Total Hip Arthroplasty in Young Patients with Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene: A Review of Studies with a Follow-Up of over 15 Years

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has in recent years trended toward a younger, more physically demanding patient population. Mid- to long-term studies of all ages of THA patients using highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) have been favorable, but concerns about its long-term failure and wear-related complications remain for young THA patients. In this narrative review, a search of the PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane databases was performed, and we identified six studies with a minimum 15-year follow-up of HXLPE with various femoral head materials. Wear-related revisions were exceedingly low for patients under the age of 55, with variable reports of non-clinically significant osteolysis. Higher activity levels, a larger femoral head size, and femoral head material were not associated with greater long-term wear rates. Young THA with metal or ceramic on HXLPE is exceedingly durable with favorable outcomes at follow-ups of over 15 years.

Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty: I Can Hear You

Background

Squeaking is a known complication of ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) total hip arthroplasty (THA), yet there is a lack of studies specifically quantifying its loudness. The aims of this study were: (1) to determine the incidence of squeaking in CoC THAs at long-term follow-up; (2) to identify risk factors; and (3) to quantify the loudness of the squeaking.

Methods

A specifically designed prospective questionnaire was used to determine the prevalence, characteristics, and loudness of squeaking in 130 (110 patients) primary THAs with fourth-generation CoC bearings at a mean follow-up of 10.5 years. The loudness of the squeaking was determined by the decibel (dB) scale from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Results

Overall, 28% of the CoC hips experienced squeaking. The mean onset was 5.7 years postoperatively, with 39% of the cases having their onset more than 5 years after their THA. Patients with a lower body mass index were more likely to report squeaking (P = .009). The mean loudness of the squeak was 35 dB (range, 10-70 dB) and was loud in 36% of the hips. Patients who developed squeaking early postoperatively had louder squeaking than those with a later onset (P = .007). The loudness of the squeaking sound progressed in 25% of the cases, and these hips had louder squeaking (P = .04).

Conclusions

Squeaking after CoC THA is not uncommon, can be relatively loud, and increases over time. This needs to be considered in young patients that are candidates for CoC THAs.

Outcomes of Ceramic-On-Ceramic Bearing Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up Study

BACKGROUND

Although the fourth generation of ceramics has demonstrated excellent clinical results 5 to 6 years postoperatively, concerns over ceramic fracture and squeaking persist and longer-term follow-up (minimum 10 years) studies are warranted. Our study aimed to evaluate the minimum 10-year clinical outcomes and bearing-specific complications of ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) total hip arthroplasties.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated all patients who underwent primary delta CoC total hip arthroplasty in our institution between January 2004 and February 2013. Demographics, surgical techniques, complications, patient-reported outcomes, and radiographic outcomes were collected and analyzed. For continuous variables, the comparison between groups was conducted using a one-way analysis of variance. Of all 235 patients included in the study, 70.5% were women (190 hips). The mean follow-up period was 12 years (range, 10 to 18). The femoral head sizes of 28- mm, 32 mm, and 36 mm were used in 50, 26, and 197 cases, respectively. Mean acetabular inclination and anteversion angles were 39.2 ± 7.1° and 14.9 ± 3.5°.

RESULTS

There were 5 hips revised at a mean 4.6 years (range, 0.1 to 7.1). One revision was squeaking-related. Squeaking was also reported by 8 other patients, but did not require revision. Other reasons for revision were early infection in 2 cases, stem loosening in 1 case, and stem fracture in 2 cases. The survival analysis for any causes for revision as an endpoint was 96.7% (95% confidence interval 0.313%-2.57%).

CONCLUSION

We report excellent mean 12-year follow-up results regarding the complications and survivorship of the fourth generation CoC bearings.

Ten to 13-Year Results of Delta Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Less Than 30 Years Old

BACKGROUND

We previously reported mid-term results of total hip arthroplasty (THA) using Delta ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings in 72 patients (86 hips) who were <30 years old. Noise was noted in 8 (9.3%) of the hips, no osteolysis or loosening was detected, and no patient required reoperation. The purpose of this study was to assess clinical and radiographic outcomes, complications, and survivorship at >10 years after THA using Delta CoC bearings in patients who were <30 years old.

METHODS

Cementless THA with a Delta CoC bearing was performed between March 2008 and January 2012 in 91 hips of 76 patients who were <30 years old. Eighty-five hips in 71 patients (44 men and 27 women) with a mean age of 25.9 years (range, 16 to 29 years) at surgery were followed for a mean of 10.9 years (range, 10 to 13 years).

RESULTS

No ceramic bearings fractured. The incidence of squeaking increased to 5.9% (5 of 85), but the squeaking was not reproducible within individual patients. Periprosthetic osteolysis developed in 3 hips (3 patients): around the stem in 2 and around the metal shell in 1. The stem in 1 hip underwent revision because of a Vancouver type-B2 periprosthetic femoral fracture. One patient with systemic lupus erythematosus underwent irrigation and debridement for periprosthetic joint infection. Survivorship free of reoperation for any reason was 92.4% (95% confidence interval, 82.4% to 100%) at 13 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term results and survivorship of Delta CoC THA in patients <30 years old were favorable.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The occurrence of squeaking under wear testing standards for ceramic on ceramic total hip replacements

Ceramic on ceramic total hip replacement clinical reports may on occasion note a noise or squeaking. There is much debate on whether this is an actual concern, but some medical centres want to avoid any possible negative impact on the patients' wellbeing due to the noise generated. The aim of this study was to determine what sound frequencies can be picked up from hip testing standards for ceramic on ceramic under different lubrication conditions. The ISO-14242-1 (35° cup angle) and ISO-14242-4 (55° cup angle with a 4 mm translational mismatch) standards were used for testing with dry, water and serum lubrication conditions up to 10000 cycles. No sound was detected for water and serum conditions under standard walking (ISO-14242-1) testing. An audible noise with a frequency range of 0.4-0.8 kHz was picked up within 600 cycles under water and edge loading (ISO-14242-4) conditions. All dry testing produced a high pitch squeak when the frequency was higher than 2 kHz. One sample under dry edge loading conditions had an audible noise of 0.8 kHz, considered not as squeaking, as it was not high pitch. Dry testing for both, standard walking (ISO-14242-1) and edge loading (ISO-14242-4) conditions, which resulted in a high pitch noise, had a frequency range of 2-8 kHz and 5-9 kHz respectively. One sample tested with edge loading and serum produced a faint squeak noise after 6000 cycles with a frequency of 7 kHz. Edge loading due to ISO-14242-4 conditions had an increased torque which may be playing a role in increased friction leading to noise. Edge loading conditions were more prone to the generation of audible noise and squeaking whilst under lubricated conditions.

Personalized Hip Joint Replacement with Large Diameter Head: Current Concepts

Hip arthroplasty is a common procedure in elective orthopaedic surgery that has excellent outcomes. Hip replacement surgery aims to create a “forgotten” joint, i.e., a pain-free joint akin to a native articulation. To achieve such goals, hip arthroplasty must be personalised. This is achieved by restoring: the centre of rotation of the native hip; leg length equality; femoral offset; femoral orientation; soft tissue tension; joint stability with an unrestricted hip range of motion; and having appropriate stress transfer to the bone. In addition, the whole pathway should provide an uneventful and swift postoperative recovery and lifetime implant survivorship with unrestricted activities. At our institution, the preferred option is a personalized total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a large diameter head (LDH) using either monobloc or dual-mobility configuration for the acetabular component. LDH THA offers an impingement-free range of motion and a reduced risk of dislocation. The larger head-neck offset allows for a supraphysiologic range of motion (ROM). This can compensate for a patient’s abnormal spinopelvic mobility and surgical imprecision. Additionally, LDH bearing with a small clearance exerts a high suction force, which provides greater hip micro-stability. With appropriate biomechanical reconstruction, LDH THA can restore normal gait parameters. This results in unrestricted activities and higher patient satisfaction scores. We use LDH ceramic on ceramic for our patients with a life expectancy of more than 20 years and use LDH dual mobility bearings for all others.