Surgeon Estimations of Acetabular Cup Orientation Using Intraoperative Fluoroscopic Imagining Are Unreliable

Robotic-assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty and Spinopelvic Parameters: A Review

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an effective treatment for osteoarthritis, and the popularity of the direct anterior approach has increased due to more rapid recovery and increased stability. Instability, commonly caused by component malposition, remains a significant concern. The dynamic relationship between the pelvis and lumbar spine, deemed spinopelvic motion, is considered an important factor in stability. Various parameters are used in evaluating spinopelvic motion. Understanding spinopelvic motion is critical, and executing a precise plan for positioning the implant can be difficult with manual instrumentation. Robotic and/or navigation systems have been developed in the effort to enhance THA outcomes and for implementing spinopelvic parameters. These systems can be classified into three categories: X-ray/fluoroscopy-based, imageless, and computed tomography (CT)-based. Each system has advantages and limitations. When using CT-based systems, preoperative CT scans are used to assist with preoperative planning and intraoperative execution, providing feedback on implant position and restoration of hip biomechanics within a functional safe zone developed according to each patient's specific spinopelvic parameters. Several studies have demonstrated the accuracy and reproducibility of robotic systems with regard to implant positioning and leg length discrepancy. Some studies have reported better radiographic and clinical outcomes with use of robotic-assisted THA. However, clinical outcomes comparable to those for manual THA have also been reported. Robotic systems offer advantages in terms of accuracy, precision, and potentially reduced rates of dislocation. Additional research, including conduct of randomized controlled trials, will be required in order to evaluate the long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness of robotic-assisted THA.

Reliability and accuracy of intraoperative fluoroscopy assessment of acetabular cup anteversion in supine direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty

Poor implantation positioning of hip prostheses is considered the primary factor affecting postoperative joint wear. Cup anteversion in direct anterior approach (DAA) total hip arthroplasty (THA) is often excessive. Intraoperative fluoroscopy (IF) are effective for improving implant placement accuracy. This study aimed to analyze IF's reliability and accuracy in assessing intraoperative anteversion. Sixty-two consecutive hips underwent primary THA utilizing DAA alongside IF for cup placement. Intraoperative anteversion was measured using IF images, while postoperative CT and standard anteroposterior (AP) radiographs were used to calculate true anteversion component angles. Differences and correlations between intraoperative and true anteversions were analyzed, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) determined the inter- and intra-observer reliabilities. Excellent intra- and inter-observer reliabilities were observed for all radiographic and CT methods (ICC > 0.9). Strong correlations (PCC > 0.6) existed between anteversion measured on IF image and postoperative CT and AP pelvic measurements. Intraoperative anteversion measured on IF images (16.8 ± 3.2°) was smaller than anteversion measured postoperatively on AP X-rays (21.3 ± 4.7°, P < 0.001) and CT (22.0 ± 4.9°, P < 0.001), with average differences of 4.5°and 5.3°, respectively. Under several influencing factors, the accuracy of IF in assessing cup anteversion in DAA-THA may be limited. However, this still requires large-sample experiments for verification.

Fluoroscopy Versus Imageless Optical Navigation in Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Utilization of the direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has risen in popularity. Accurate implant placement is a critical factor that influences patient outcomes. The goal of this study was to compare the accuracy and precision of fluoroscopy with imageless optical navigation in DAA THA.

METHODS

This was a cohort study of 640 consecutive primary DAA THAs performed with intraoperative fluoroscopy (n = 300 patients) or imageless optical navigation (n = 304 patients). Accuracy was compared by measuring acetabular cup inclination, anteversion, and leg-length discrepancy (LLD). The proportion of implants placed within the Lewinnek safe zone and those placed within a more precise target of 40 ± 5° inclination and 20 ± 5° anteversion was evaluated.

RESULTS

According to the Lewinnek criteria, there was no difference in the percentage of implants placed within both inclination and anteversion targets (fluoroscopy: 90.3%; navigation: 88.8%, P = 0.519). Using the more precise targets, navigation increased the implants positioned correctly for both inclination and anteversion (fluoroscopy: 50.3%; navigation: 65.6%, P < 0.001). Navigation increased the proportion of implants positioned within the target anteversion zone (fluoroscopy: 71.3%; navigation: 83.8%, P < 0.001) but not inclination (fluoroscopy: 71.9%; navigation: 76.9%, P = 0.147). The mean LLD was higher with the use of fluoroscopy compared with navigation (5.5 mm, standard deviation: 4.1; 4.6 mm, SD: 3.4, P < 0.005). No difference in dislocation rate was observed ( P = 0.643).

CONCLUSION

Both fluoroscopy and imageless optical navigation demonstrated accurate acetabular implant positioning during DAA THA. Navigation was more precise and associated with improved acetabular anteversion placement and restoration of LLD. Navigation is an accurate alternative to fluoroscopy with decreased radiation exposure.