Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation

The top 100 most-cited total knee arthroplasty publications

The object is to objectively identify the 100 most influential scientific publications in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and provide an analysis of their main characteristics. The Clarivate Analytics Web of Knowledge database was used to obtain data and metrics of TKA research. The search list was sorted by the number of citations, and articles were included or excluded based on relevance to TKA. The information extracted for each article included author name, publication year, country of origin, journal name, article type, and the level of evidence. These 100 studies generated a total of 35,399 cita- tions, with an average of 355.9 citations per article. The most-cited article was cited 1273 times. The 100 studies included in this analysis were published between 2000 and 2017. 23 different journals published these 100 publications. Majority of the publications were from United States (n = 52), followed by UK (n = 10) and Canada (n = 8). The most prevalent study designs were case series (n = 32) and cohort studies (n = 30). The 100 most influential articles in TKA were cited a total of 35,399 times. The study designs most prevalent were case series and cohort studies. This article serves as a reference to direct orthopedic surgeons to the 100 most influential studies in total knee arthroplasty. More than half of the studies are from North America, and three journals hold two-thirds of the 100 most cited publications on the topic.

The Definition of the Tibial Sagittal Plane and the Paradox of Imageless Navigation and Robotics: A Cadaveric Study

BACKGROUND

The accuracy, precision, and repeatability by which the tibial sagittal plane can be found with imageless technology is currently unknown. The purpose of this study was to identify any differences between imageless and image-based technology to define the sagittal plane of the tibia.

METHODS

A computed tomography (CT) was obtained of 18 cadavers with the knee fully extended. The surgical trans-epicondylar axis and several tibial rotation references were acquired on the CT scan. After a medial parapatellar approach, the same anatomical landmarks were acquired in vivo. In the horizontal plane, the angle between the surgical trans-epicondylar axis and the tibial rotational axes was assessed.

RESULTS

Highest accuracy was found for posterior cruciate ligament (PCL)-anterior cruciate ligament (ACL, -1.48°, standard deviation [SD] 13.64; imageless), tibial medial condyle (TMC)-tibial lateral condyle (TLC, 1.72°, SD 4.24; image-based), the ACL-medial border of tibial tuberosity (MTT, -2.89°, SD 18.86; image-based). Highest precision was acquired with image-based technology: TMC-TLC (SD 4.24), PCL-ACL (SD 5.86), and PCL-medial third of tibial tuberosity (M3TT, SD 7.10). Excellent intraobserver and interobserver correlation coefficients were observed with image-based technology: PCL-MTT, anterior medial condyle (AMC)-anterior lateral condyle (ALC), and TMC-TLC (Intraobserver and interobserver correlation coefficients 0.90-0.98).

CONCLUSION

The tibial sagittal plane could be defined with highest accuracy, precision, and repeatability on a preoperative CT. Imageless methodology lacked the precision and repeatability of image-based technology. With the current pursuit of high accuracy and precision in total knee arthroplasty, the reference frame used to quantify implant position should be highly accurate and precise as well.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, Case Series.

A retrospective study of articular surface mounting computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty in alignment, knee function, and survival

Background

Hong Kong Chinese exhibits a greater varus lower limb mechanical axis and coronal bowing when compared to Caucasians. This anatomical difference may affect the accuracy of bone cuts in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using western anatomy-based intramedullary TKA cutting jigs. Use of computer navigation may avoid suboptimal cuts due to altered anatomy. This is the first study evaluating clinical function, radiological alignment and long-term survival of computer-assisted TKA amongst Hong Kong Chinese patients.

Methods

Retrospective study comparing articular surface mounting computer-assisted TKA (ASM-CATKA) and conventional TKA performed in a single centre from 2008 to 2010. Patients were followed up for ​assessment of clinical parameters including range of motion, Knee Society Knee score, and radiological parameters such as limb alignment, component alignment, and survival.

Results

Seventy-five patients were included in this study. Baseline clinical and radiological data were similar between groups. The computer-navigated group had superior radiological mechanical alignment ( p < 0.001), tibial component alignment ( p = 0.016) and femoral component alignment ( p < 0.01) when compared to conventional TKA. There were no differences in knee scores ( p = 0.488), range of motion ( p = 0.432) and survival at 117 months ( p = 0.986) between the two groups.

Conclusion

This retrospective study showed that ASM-CATKA was more accurate in achieving neutral mechanical axis and component alignment amongst Hong Kong Chinese. Clinical outcomes and implant survival were comparable.

Functional Outcome Based on Mechanical Axis Alignment Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the most commonly performed and highly successful surgical intervention for end-stage osteoarthritis of the knee, and it offers patients pain relief, functional recovery, and improved quality of life. The success of knee arthroplasty depends on various factors such as precise surgical technique, alignment of the limb and components, patient selection, and compliance with rehabilitation. Mechanical alignment of the lower limb has been considered an important factor in planning and assessing the success of TKA. Optimal alignment remains a matter of controversy; hence, it is paramount to assess the alignment and functional outcomes.

Aim and objective

This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of conventional instrumentation in imparting the intended femoral and tibial coronal alignment, as well as study the functional outcome among the neutrally aligned outliers with respect to the mechanical axis of the lower limb using standing long-leg radiographs.

Methodology

This is a prospective, hospital-based, observational study that was conducted on 60 knees in 42 patients with primary osteoarthritis of the knee joint in the department of orthopedics, Satguru Partap Singh (SPS) Hospitals, Ludhiana. Patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included in our study and evaluated using Knee Society Score and knee flexion range at periodic follow-up till six months. Preoperative and postoperative standing long-leg radiographs were done for all the patients, and their functional outcome was compared among inliers and outliers.

Results

Out of these 60 total knee arthroplasties, 18 patients were operated on both knees, and 24 patients were operated on a single knee. There were 25 female patients and 17 male patients. The mean for pre-operative mechanical axis alignment angle was 11.88° ± 5.63° with a range from -3° to 27°, which changed to 2.90° ± 1.59° with a range from 0° to 8° at six months follow-up. It was observed that 42 of the knees were in the inliers, and the remaining 18 knees were in the outliers group. On comparison among inliers and outliers, we found that the mean range of motion was 108.29° ± 4.82° for the inliers group and 106.11° ± 4.04° for the outliers group (p = 0.091), depicting non-significant statistical comparison. Mean Knee Society Score values in inliers and outliers group were 152.45 ± 5.33 and 151.61 ± 3.55, respectively (p = 0.740), showing no statistical significance.

Conclusion

At six months follow-up, there is no difference in the knee range of motion and Knee Society Scores between mechanical axis inliers and outliers. Thus, we conclude that although every knee arthroplasty is intended to have neutral mechanical alignment, there is no effect of mild mechanical axis malalignment on functional outcome following total knee arthroplasty in the short term.

Do bicortical diaphyseal array pins create the risk of periprosthetic fracture in robotic-assisted knee arthroplasties?

Background

Optical array placement for robotic-assisted knee replacement introduces the rare, but real risk of periprosthetic fracture. The purpose of this retrospective study was to review the incidence of fracture with the conventional technique of bicortical diaphyseal pin placement. We also evaluated a modified method of unicortical periarticular pin placement to mitigate this risk.

Methods

We reviewed 2603 knee arthroplasties that were performed between June 2017 and December 2019. The conventional bicortical diaphyseal technique was used in 1571 knees (bicortical diaphyseal group) and the unicortical periarticular technique was used in 1032 knees (unicortical periarticular group).

Results

A more than 1-year follow-up revealed that 3 femoral shaft fractures (0.19%) occurred in the bicortical diaphyseal group and no fracture took place in the unicortical periarticular group. There was no array loosening in either group.

Conclusions

The modified unicortical periarticular pin placement is a reliable technique for computer-navigated and robotic-assisted knee arthroplasties. It may be associated with a lower incidence of postoperative femoral shaft fractures, compared to conventional bicortical diaphyseal pinning.

Computer-Navigated versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Functional Outcomes from Level I and II Randomized Controlled Trials

The main purpose of this article is to provide an up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis comparing functional outcomes of total knee arthroplasty using either computer navigation (NAV-TKA) or conventional methods (CON-TKA) from the latest assemblage of evidence. This study was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. All Level I and II randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane that compared functional outcomes after NAV- and CON-TKA were included in the review. Selected end points for random effects, pairwise meta-analysis included Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS), KS Function Score (KSFS), KS Total Score (KSTS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and range of motion at three arbitrary follow-up times. A total of 24 prospective RCTs comprising 3,778 knees were included from the initial search. At long-term follow-up (>5 years), NAV-TKA exhibited significantly better raw KSKS (p = 0.001) (low-quality evidence), contrary to CON-TKA, which reflected significantly better raw KSTS (p = 0.004) (high-quality evidence). While change scores (KSKS, WOMAC) from preoperative values favor CON-TKA at short-term (<6 months) and medium-term follow-up (6-60 months), long-term follow-up change scores in KSKS suggest the superiority of NAV-TKA over CON-TKA (p = 0.02) (very low-quality evidence). Overall, sizeable dispersion of nonstatistically significant functional outcomes in the medium term was observed to eventually converge in the long term, with less differences in functional outcome scores between the two treatment methods in short- and long-term follow-up. While raw functional outcome scores reflect no differences between NAV and CON-TKA, long-term follow-up change scores in KSKS suggest superiority of NAV-TKA over its conventional counterpart. Prospective studies with larger power are required to support the pattern of diminishing differences in functional outcome scores from medium- to long-term follow-up between the two modalities.

Mid-term functional outcomes of patient-specific versus conventional instrumentation total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study

INTRODUCTION

Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) utilizes three-dimensional imaging to produce total knee arthroplasty cutting jigs which matches patient's native anatomy. However, there are limited mid- to long-term studies examining its clinical efficacy. The aim of this study was to compare functional outcomes of PSI surgery versus conventional TKA surgery at 5-year follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty patients were prospectively recruited into either the MRI-based PSI or conventional TKA group. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Knee Society Function Score (KSFS), Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS), while quality of life was evaluated with the Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS) of Short-Form 36 and compared between the two groups at 5-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Although the PCS was 7 ± 3 points better in the PSI group preoperatively (p = 0.017), it became 5 ± 2 points worse than the conventional group at 5-year follow-up (p = 0.025). As compared to the PSI group, the conventional group showed a significantly greater improvement in PCS at 5 years as compared to before surgery (p = 0.003). There were no significant differences in KSFS, KSKS, OKS or MCS between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

PSI TKA did not result in improved functional outcomes or better quality of life when compared to conventional TKA. The additional costs and waiting time associated with PSI are not justifiable and therefore not recommended as an alternative to conventional TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Better accuracy and reproducibility of a new robotically-assisted system for total knee arthroplasty compared to conventional instrumentation: a cadaveric study

PURPOSE

Robotically-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been shown to improve alignment and decrease outliers, an important goal in TKA procedures. The purpose of this cadaveric study was to compare the accuracy and reproducibility of a recently introduced TKA robotic system to conventional instrumentation for bone resections.

METHODS

This cadaveric study compared 14 robotically-assisted TKA with 20 conventional TKAs. Four board-certified high volume arthroplasty surgeons with no prior experience in robotics (except one) performed the procedures with three different implant systems. Angle and level of bone resections obtained from optical navigation or calliper measurements were compared to the intra-operative plan to determine accuracy. Group comparison was performed using Student t test (mean) and F test (variance), with significance at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

The robotic group demonstrated statistically more accurate results (p < 0.05) and fewer outliers (p < 0.05) than conventional instrumentation when aiming for neutral alignment. Final limb alignment (HKA) had an accuracy of 0.8° ± 0.6° vs 2.0° ± 1.6°, with 100% vs 75% of cases within 3° and 93% vs 60% within 2°. For the robotically-assisted knees, the accuracy of bone resection angles was below 0.6° with standard deviations below 0.4°, except for the femur flexion (1.3° ± 1.0°), and below 0.7 mm with standard deviations below 0.7 mm for bone resection levels.

CONCLUSION

This in vitro study has demonstrated that this novel TKA robotic system produces more accurate and more reproducible bone resections than conventional instrumentation. It supports the clinical use of this new robotic system.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Cadaveric study, Level V.

Computer-Assisted Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery

BACKGROUND

There are many ways in which computer-assisted orthopedic and trauma surgery (CAOS) procedures can help surgeons to plan and execute an intervention.

METHODS

This study is based on data derived from a selective search of the literature in the PubMed database, supported by a Google Scholar search.

RESULTS

For most applications the evidence is weak. In no sector did the use of computer-assisted surgery yield any relevant clinical or functional improvement. In trauma surgery, 3D-navigated sacroiliac screw fixation has become clinically established for the treatment of pelvic fractures. One randomized controlled trial showed a reduction in the rate of screw misplacement: 0% with 3D navigation versus 20.4% with the conventional procedure und 16.6% with 2D navigation. Moreover, navigation-assisted pedicle screw stabilization lowers the misplacement rate. In joint replacements, the long-term results showed no difference in respect of clinical/functional scores, the time for which the implant remained in place, or aseptic loosening.

CONCLUSION

Computer-assisted procedures can improve the precision of certain surgical interventions. Particularly in joint replacement and spinal surgery, the research is moving away from navigation in the direction of robotic procedures. Future studies should place greater emphasis on clinical and functional results.

New technology-based assistive techniques in total knee arthroplasty: A Bayesian network meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

The radiological and clinical efficiency among robot-assisted surgery (RAS), computer-assisted navigation system (CAS) and conventional (CON) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial.

METHODS

Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) and systematic review were performed to investigate radiological and clinical efficiency respectively. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated using GRADE and CERQual tool.

RESULTS

Thirty-four RCTs (7289 patients and 7424 knees) were included. The NMA showed that RAS-TKA had the highest probability for mechanical axis restoration (odds ratio for RAS vs. CAS 3.79, CrI 1.14 to 20.54, very low certainty), followed by CAS-TKA (odds ratio for CAS vs. CON 2.55, CrI 1.67 to 4.01, very low certainty) and then CON-TKA, without significant differences in other radiological parameters. No differences were found in clinical outcomes after qualitative systematic review (overall low certainty).

CONCLUSIONS

Technology-based assistive techniques (CAS and RAS) may surpass the CON-TKA, when considering higher radiological accuracy and comparable clinical outcomes. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Population-based Survivorship of Computer-navigated Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The goal of computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is to improve the accuracy of alignment. However, the relationship between this technology and implant longevity has not been established. The purpose of this study was to analyze survivorship of computer-navigated TKAs compared with traditionally instrumented TKAs.

METHODS

The PearlDiver Medicare database was used to identify patients who underwent a primary TKA using conventional instrumentation versus computer navigation between 2005 and 2014. Conventional and computer-navigated cohorts were matched by age, sex, year of procedure, comorbidities, and geographic region. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to estimate survivorship with aseptic mechanical complications, periprosthetic joint infection, and all-cause revision as end points.

RESULTS

During the study period, 75,709 patients who underwent a computer-navigated TKA were identified and matched to a cohort of 75,676 conventional TKA patients from a cohort of 1,607,803 conventional TKA patients. No difference existed in survival between conventional instrumentation (94.7%) and navigated TKAs (95.1%, P = 0.06) at 5 years. A modest decrease was found in revisions secondary to mechanical complications associated with navigation (96.1%) compared with conventional instrumentation (95.7%, P = 0.02) at 5 years. No differences in revision rates because of periprosthetic joint infection were observed (97.9% versus 97.9% event-free survival, P = 0.30). In a subgroup of Medicare patients younger than 65 years of age, use of computer navigation was associated with a decrease in all-cause revision (91.4% versus 89.6% event free survival, P = 0.01) and revision secondary to mechanical complications (89.6% versus 87.8% event-free survival, P = 0.01) at 5 years.

DISCUSSION

Among Medicare patients, no notable difference existed in TKA survival associated with the use of computer navigation at the 5-year follow-up. Use of computer navigation was associated with a slight decrease in revisions secondary to mechanical failure. Although improved survivorship was associated with patients younger than 65 years of age who had a navigated TKA, generalizability of these findings is limited given the unique characteristics of this Medicare subpopulation.

Computer and robotic - assisted total knee arthroplasty: a review of outcomes

Background

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a successful treatment for tricompartmental knee arthritis. Computer navigation and robotic-assisted-surgery (RAS) have emerged as tools that aim to help plan and execute surgery with greater precision and consistency. We reviewed the most current literature to describe the historical background and outcomes compared to conventional TKA.

Methods

A review and synthesis of the literature comparing the patient reported outcomes (PROM’s) of RA TKA and computer-assisted (CA) TKA to conventional TKA was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

Results

CAS TKA improves accuracy and consistency of implant position, and appears to provide a small improvement in PROMs and implant survival compared to conventional TKA. RTKA similarly improves implant accuracy compared to conventional techniques and early results suggest a similar small benefit in PROMs compared to conventional TKA. A strengthening trend is emerging showing CAS TKA has greatest benefit to implant survival in people under 65. RTKA survival analysis data is more limited and early results do not allow strong conclusions, however early trends are similar to CAS TKA.

Conclusion

Results for CAS-TKA show improvement in alignment, and early clinical outcomes have revealed promising results, with longer-term data and medium-term survival analysis recently emerging showing small benefits over conventional TKA. RTKA represents another phase of development. Early results show similar trends to that of CAS TKA with longer-term data still to come.

Overview of Randomized Controlled Trials in Total Knee Arthroplasty (47,675 Patients): What Have We Learnt?

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to provide an overview of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in primary total knee arthroplasty summarizing the available high-quality evidence.

METHODS

Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, 2019, Issue 3), Ovid MEDLINE, and Embase. We excluded nonrandomized trials, trials on unicompartmental knee arthroplasty or revision surgery, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Trials that met our inclusion criteria were assessed using a binary outcome measure of whether they reported statistically significant findings. These were then classified according to the intervention groups (surgical approach, tourniquet use, design, etc.).

RESULTS

Four hundred and three RCTs met the inclusion criteria and were included. The total number of patients in those 403 RCTs was 47,675. Only 33 RCTs (8.2%) reported significant differences between the intervention and the control groups. The trials were grouped into surgical approach 34, tourniquet 31, minimally invasive surgery 13, patient specific instrumentation 30, knee design 37, fixation 27, mobile bearing 47, navigation 50, polyethylene 19, technique 27, patella resurfacing 26, drain 19, closure 16, and others 27 RCTs.

CONCLUSION

For the vast majority of patients, a standard conventional total knee arthroplasty with a surgical approach familiar to the surgeon using standard well-established components, with or without tourniquet, without surgical drain leads to satisfactory long-term clinical outcomes.

Comparison of computer-assisted navigation and conventional instrumentation for bilateral total knee arthroplasty: The outcomes at mid-term follow-up

It remains unclear if computer-assisted surgery (CAS) technique actually improves the clinical outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and decreases the failure rate. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the functional results of TKA in a series of patients who underwent staged bilateral TKAs with CAS TKA in 1 knee and conventional TKA in the contralateral knee.From January 1997 to December 2010, we collected 60 patients who were randomly assigned to receive CAS TKA in 1 limb and conventional TKA in the other. The Brainlab Vector Vision navigation system was used for CAS TKA, and the DePuy press-fit condylar sigma guide system was used for conventional TKA. Patients were assessed before surgery, 3 months and 1 year after surgery, and annually thereafter. IKS criteria were used for radiographic evaluation. Clinical and functional evaluation using the scoring system of hospital for special surgery (HSS), international knee society (IKS), Western Ontario and McMaster University osteoarthritis index (WOMAC), and short form-36 (SF-36) were obtained on each knee, before surgery, and at each follow-up visit. Pertinent statistical methods were adopted for data analysis.Fifty-six patients were available for analysis and 44 of the patients were female. The mean duration of follow-up was 8.1 years. Less blood loss (P = .007) and longer operation time were noted for CAS TKAs when compared with conventional TKAs. Precise alignment and fewer outliers of the lower limb and prosthetic component positions were found for CAS TKAs (P < .001). There were no differences between the 2 groups before surgery and at the latest follow-up with regard to scores for HSS, IKS, WOMAC, and SF-36 as well as active range of motion.The clinical outcomes of CAS TKAs at the 8-year follow-up were similar to those of conventional TKAs despite the better radiographic alignment and fewer outliers achieved with navigation assistance.

Comparison of a novel handheld accelerometer-based navigation system and conventional instrument for performing distal femoral resection in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

Background

This prospective study aimed to compare the efficacy of a novel, hand-held, accelerometer-based navigation system (i-JOIN knee navigation system) for distal femoral resection in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with conventional instrument.

Methods

A multi-center, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted. A total of 79 consecutive patients scheduled for primary TKA were enrolled and divided into navigation group (39 patients) and conventional group (40 patients). Post-operative mechanical and component position were evaluated through full-leg weight bearing X-ray. Pre-operatively and 1 week post-operatively, adverse events were recorded. Intraoperative surgical time and blood loss were also recorded.

Results

The mean outlier of 180° neutral mechanical axis was 1.60° (SD 1.11°) in navigation group and 2.30° (SD 2.06°) in conventional group (P=0.0917). Thirty-eight patients (97.4%) in navigation group and 35 patients (87.5%) in conventional group had an alignment which was ≤3°away from the neutral mechanical axis (P=0.2007). α angle between the navigation group and conventional group was not statistically different (89.81° vs. 89.76°, P>0.05), as well as adverse events rate post-operatively. The operative time of navigation group was significantly longer than that of control group (114.54±35.34 vs. 100.33±28.38 min, P=0.0493), whereas the intraoperative blood loss was not significantly different.

Conclusions

i-JOIN knee navigation system had equivalent results for distal femoral resection in TKA compared with the conventional technique.

Does Accelerometer-based Navigation Have Any Clinical Benefit Compared with Conventional TKA? A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Accelerometer-based navigation is a handheld navigation tool that was introduced to offer a simpler technique compared with more-cumbersome computer-assisted surgery (CAS). Considering the increasing number of adopters, it seems important to evaluate the potential clinical benefits of this technology compared with conventional TKA.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

In this systematic review, we asked: (1) Is accelerometer-based navigation more accurate than conventional TKA? (2) Does accelerometer-based navigation provide better functional outcome than conventional TKA? (3) Does accelerometer-based navigation increase surgical time or decrease the risk of complications or reoperations compared with conventional TKA?

METHODS

This systematic review included all comparative prospective and retrospective studies published in the MEDLINE/PubMed and Cochrane libraries over the last 10 years. Inclusion criteria were all studies in English that compared accelerometer-based navigation with conventional TKA. Eleven studies met these criteria with 621 knees in accelerometer-based navigation group and 677 knees in conventional TKA group. Results related to alignment, objective and subjective functional scores, duration of surgery, complications and reoperations were extracted and compared between accelerometer-based-navigation and conventional TKA. Methodological quality was assessed using Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool (for nonrandomized control trials) and Cochrane Risk of Bias (for randomized control trials (RCTs). All studies with fair or better quality were included. Four RCTs and six nonrandomized studies comparing accelerometer-based navigation to conventional TKA were found.

RESULTS

Inconsistent evidence on mechanical axis alignment was found, with five of nine studies slightly favoring the accelerometer-based navigation group, and the other four showing no differences between the groups. Only two of eight studies favored accelerometer-based navigation in terms of tibial component alignment in the coronal plane; the other six found no between-group differences. Similarly, mixed results were found regarding other metrics related to component alignment; a minority of studies favored accelerometer-based navigation by a small margin, and most studies found no between-group differences. Only three studies evaluated functional outcome and none of them showed a difference in range of motion or patient-reported outcomes. Most studies, six of seven, found no between-group differences concerning surgical time; one study demonstrated a slight increase in time with accelerometer-based navigation. There were no between-group differences in terms of the risk of complications, which generally were uncommon in both groups, and no reoperations or revisions were reported in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

We found conflicting evidence about whether accelerometer-based navigation reduces the number of coronal-plane outliers or improves alignment to a clinically important degree, and we found no evidence that it improves patient-reported outcomes or reduces the risk of complications or reoperations. Accelerometer-based navigation may increase surgical time. The overall quality of the evidence was low, which suggested that any observed benefits were overestimated. Given the absence of higher-quality evidence demonstrating compelling benefits of this accelerometer-based navigation technology, it should not be widely adopted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Robot-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Does Not Improve Long-Term Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Whether robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves the accuracy of radiographic alignment leading to improved patient satisfaction and implant survivorship in the long term has thus far been inconclusive.

METHODS

We retrospectively compared the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of 84 knees that had undergone robot-assisted TKA using ROBODOC vs 79 knees that had undergone conventional TKA. The mean duration of the follow-up period was 129.1 months (range: 108-147 months). Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Knee Society Score and 36-item Short Form Survey, as well as by assessing the range of motion, operation time, and complications. Radiologic outcomes were evaluated by assessing the hip-knee-ankle angle, coronal and sagittal alignments of the femoral and tibial components, and any radiologic abnormalities such as loosening or osteolysis.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the two groups. The prevalence of an outlier for the hip-knee-ankle angle in the robot-assisted group was 10.7%, whereas it was 16.5% in the conventional group (P = .172). The other component alignments (α°, β°, γ°, δ°) revealed a tendency toward a lower rate of outliers in the robot-assisted group, but without statistical significance (P > .05). In addition, there was no significant difference in complications, including revision surgery, between both groups.

CONCLUSION

Robot-assisted TKA does not improve long-term clinical or radiologic outcomes compared with conventional TKA.

Accuracy assessment of a novel image-free handheld robot for Total Knee Arthroplasty in a cadaveric study

Surgical navigation has been shown to improve the accuracy of bone preparation and limb alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Previous work has shown the effectiveness of various types of navigation systems. Here, for the first time, we assessed the accuracy of a novel imageless semiautonomous handheld robotic sculpting system in performing bone resection and preparation in TKA using cadaveric specimens. In this study, we compared the planned and final implant placement in 18 cadaveric specimens undergoing TKA using the new tool. Eight surgeons carried out the procedures using three types of implant designs. A quantitative analysis was performed to determine the translational, angular, and rotational differences between the planned and achieved positions of the implants. The mean femoral flexion, varus/valgus, and rotational error was -2.0°, -0.1°, and -0.5°, respectively. The mean tibial posterior slope, and varus/valgus error was -0.2°, and -0.2°, respectively. We obtained higher flexion errors for the femoral implant when using cut-guides as compared to using a bur for cutting the bones. The image-free robotic sculpting tool achieved accurate implementation of the surgical plan with small errors in implant placement. Future studies will focus on determining how well the accurate implant placement translates into a clinical and functional benefit for the patient.

No definite advantage of a portable accelerometer-based navigation system over conventional technique in total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Precise implant alignment is a crucial prognostic factor in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Portable navigation systems (PN-TKA) were reported to be better than the conventional technique (CON-TKA). We hypothesized that PN-TKA offered greater radiologic precision than CON-TKA in mechanically aligning components. We investigated whether (1) it improved global mechanical alignment, and (2) optimized component placement with respect to the tibial and femoral mechanical axes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A systematic literature review compared PN-TKA versus CON-TKA. PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library search retrieved ten studies. Their data were pooled using RevMan 5.3. Odds ratios (OR) for dichotomous data were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each outcome. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed as I² using a standard χ² test. I²>50% denoted significant heterogeneity requiring a random effects model; otherwise, a fixed effects model was applied.

RESULTS

There were significantly fewer outliers for mechanical axis (I²=24%, OR=0.62, 95% CI=0.42-0.91, p=0.02) and coronal femoral component angle (I²=58%, OR=0.31, 95% CI=0.13-0.73, p=0.007) using PN-TKA; however, no significant difference was observed for coronal tibial component angle outliers (I²=0%, OR=0.66, 95% CI=0.38-1.15, p=0.14).

DISCUSSION

Although PN-TKA appeared to improve global alignment, it had no effect on coronal tibial alignment, which is a key factor in predicting the long-term success of component fixation. There thus appeared to be no definite advantage of PN-TKA over CON-TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Trends in computer navigation and robotic assistance for total knee arthroplasty in the United States: an analysis of patient and hospital factors

Background

Computer navigation and robotic assistance technologies are used to improve the accuracy of component positioning in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), with the goal of improving function and optimizing implant longevity. The purpose of this study was to analyze trends in the use of technology-assisted TKA, identify factors associated with the use of these technologies, and describe potential drivers of cost.

Methods

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was used to identify patients who underwent TKA using conventional instrumentation, computer navigation, and robot-assisted techniques between 2005 and 2014. Variables analyzed include patient demographics, hospital and payer types, and hospital charges. Descriptive statistics were used to describe trends. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify differences between conventional and technology-assisted groups.

Results

Our analysis identified 6,060,901 patients who underwent TKA from 2005 to 2014, of which 273,922 (4.5%) used computer navigation and 24,084 (0.4%) used robotic assistance. The proportion of technology-assisted TKAs steadily increased over the study period, from 1.2% in 2005 to 7.0% in 2014. Computer navigation increased in use from 1.2% in 2005 to 6.3% in 2014. Computer navigation was more likely to be used in the Western United States, whereas robot-assisted TKAs were more likely to be performed in the Northeast. Increased hospital charges were associated with the use of technology assistance ($53,740.1 vs $47,639.2).

Conclusions

The use of computer navigation and robot-assisted TKA steadily increased over the study period, accounting for 7.0% of TKAs performed in the United States in 2014. Marked regional differences in the use of these technologies were identified. The use of these technologies was associated with increased hospital charges.

Computer-assisted surgery in total knee replacement: advantages, surgical procedure and review of the literature

Introduction: Total knee replacement (TKR) is one of the most frequent orthopaedic procedures performed every year. At the same time 20% of patients who underwent TKR are not satisfied with the outcome. The reasons are unknown; we think that a mechanical alignment beyond 3° of varus-valgus can represent the most important cause of failure of TKR and consequently patient dissatisfaction. Materials and Methods: Neutral mechanical alignment is the main goal in every TKR: this can be achieved through different tools, such as extramedullary and intramedullary guides, patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and computer-assisted surgery (CAS). The aim of this review is to compare the different alignment techniques in TKR, to describe CAS procedure and CAS results in recent literature. Results: Regarding the intramedullary guide, there is an increased risk of fatty embolism; there are great limitations on its use, or even impossibility, in cases of bone deformity and sequelae of trauma. Regarding the extramedullary guide, it becomes more difficult to use in cases of great obesity or increased soft-tissue volume around the tibia. PSI for TKR has been introduced to improve alignment, reduce outliers, operation time and the risk of fatty embolism by avoidance of intramedullary canal violation. Recent randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis proved no advantage of PSI in improving mechanical axis and implant survivorship. Discussion: CAS has provided to be a useful tool in assisting the surgeon to achieve more accurate post-operative mechanical axis through precise and reproducible bone cuts and ligament balancing. Two meta-analyses definitively proved that CAS technique improves mechanical axis and implant survivorship and one recent meta-analysis demonstrated that CAS provides better mechanical alignment and higher functional scores at short-term follow-up. (www.actabiomedica.it)

Computer-assisted versus intramedullary and extramedullary alignment system in total knee replacement: Long term follow-up

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this work is to compare in a retrospective study, the radiological results of three series of different total knee replacements performed using Orthopilot computer-based alignment system (Group A, 31 patients), a totally intramedullary alignment system (Group B, 34 patients) and a totally extramedullary alignment system (Group C, 32 patients).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

At a medium follow-up of 15 years, all patients underwent call interview for clinical update. Of the 115 patients initially enrolled in the study, only 97 were available for radiological assessment. Both standing long-leg antero-posterior radiographs and lateral radiographs of the knee had been taken for every patient at 1 year-follow-up and at the last follow-up.

RESULTS

At the last follow-up, the mean hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) was 179.1° (range: 176°-184°) for group A, 178.6° (range: 173°-186°) for group B and 177.8° (range: 172°-186°) for group C with no statistically significant difference among the 3 groups. The mean frontal femoral component angle (FFC) was 90.5° (range: 87°-94°) for group A, 91.05° (range: 85°-95°) for group B and 91.19° (range: 85°-96°) for group C and there was no statistically significant difference among the three groups. The mean frontal tibial component angle (FTC) was 89.9° (range: 83°-97°) for group A, 90.6° (range: 87°-95°) for group B and 90.8° (range: 86°-95°) for group C and there was no statistically significant difference among the three groups. The mean tibial component inclination in the sagittal plane was 1° (range: 3°-0°) for group A, 3.6° (range: 7°-0°) for group B and 3.1° (range: 6°-0°) for group C.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrated statistically significant differences between computer-assisted and extramedullary group, in favour of navigated group in terms of implant position and mechanical alignment. Computer-assisted group showed superior but not statistically significant differences compared to intramedullary alignment system in terms of implant position and mechanical alignment. We advocate the use of computer-assisted system routinely in total knee replacement. As an alternative, we suggest the use of intramedullary system.

Alignment in total knee arthroplasty - A comparison of patient-specific implants with the conventional technique

BACKGROUND

Incorrect positioning and malalignment of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) components can result in implant loosening. Restoration of neutral alignment of the leg is an important factor affecting the long-term results of TKA. The aim of our retrospective study was to compare mechanical axis in patients with conventional and patient-specific TKAs.

METHODS

232 patients who underwent TKA between January 2013 and December 2014 were included to compare postoperative mechanical axis. 125 patients received a patient-specific TKA (iTotal CR®, Conformis) and 107 a conventional TKA (Triathlon®, Stryker). Standardized pre- and postoperative long-leg standing radiographs were retrospectively evaluated to compare the two patient cohorts.

RESULTS

113 (90%) radiographs of patient-specific TKA and 88 (82%) of conventional TKA were available for comparison. The preoperative deviation from neutral limb axis was 9.0° (0.1–27.3°) in the patient-specific TKA cohort and 8.2° (0.2–18.2°) in the conventional TKA group. Postoperatively the patient-specific TKA group showed 3.2° (0.1–8.4°) and the conventional TKA cohort 2.3° (0.1–12.5°) deviation. However, the rate of ± 3° outliers from neutral limb axis was 16% in the patient-specific TKA cohort and 26% in the conventional TKA group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-specific TKA demonstrated fewer outliers from neutral leg alignment compared to conventional technique. Potential benefits in the long-term outcome and functional improvement require further investigation.

Conventional versus computer-assisted surgery in total knee arthroplasty: comparison at ten years follow-up

PURPOSE

Computer-assisted systems (CAS) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were expected to result in more accurate prosthesis implantation, better patient outcomes, and longer implant survival when compared to conventional instrumentation (CI). The aim of this study was to compare two groups of patients operated using CAS or CI at ten years follow-up.

METHODS

One hundred twenty TKA patients, 60 using CAS and 60 using CI, were contacted after a decade for follow-up. Eligible patients received radiological examination to assess the lower-limb mechanical axis. They were also clinically assessed using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the Knee Society Score for Knee (KSS-K) and Function (KSS-F) Scoring. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to assess revisions, not for post-traumatic reasons.

RESULTS

In CAS and CI groups, the lower-limb mechanical axis was 1.7° ± 2.4° and 1.5° ± 2.8°, respectively; corresponding KOOS values were 82.3 ± 14.3 and 78.6 ± 14.4; KSS-K values were 85.9 ± 11.1 and 85.0 ± 9.7; KSS-F values were 82.2 ± 19.3 and 83.8 ± 18. For these assessments, the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Two CAS (3.8%) and three CI patients (5.7%) were revised. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant differences between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences were found at long-term follow-up in terms of radiographical-clinical outcomes and of implant survival between TKA operated using CAS or CI.

Can a Single-Use and Patient-Specific Instrumentation Be Reliably Used in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Multicenter Controlled Study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this controlled multicenter study is to evaluate the clinical and radiologic outcomes of primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using single-use fully disposable and patient-specific cutting guides (SU) and compare the results to those obtained with traditional patient-specific cutting guides (PSI) vs conventional instrumentation (CI).

METHODS

Seventy consecutive patients had their TKA performed using SU. They were compared to 140 historical patients requiring TKA that were randomized to have the procedure performed using PSI vs CI. The primary measure outcome was mechanical axis as measured on a standing long-leg radiograph using the hip-knee-ankle angle. Secondary outcome measures were Knee Society and Oxford knee scores, operative time, need for postoperative transfusion, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

The mean hip-knee-ankle value was 179.8° (standard deviation [SD] 3.1°), 179.2° (SD 2.9°), and 178.3° (SD 2.5°) in the CI, PSI and SU groups, respectively (P = .0082). Outliers were identified in 16 of 65 (24.6%), 15 of 67 (22.4%), and 14 of 70 (20.0%) knees in the CI, PSI, and SU group, respectively (P = .81). There was no significant difference in the clinical results (P = .29 and .19, respectively). Operative time, number of unit transfusion, and length of hospital stay were not significantly different between the 3 groups (P = .45, .31, and 0.98, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The use of an SU in TKA provided similar clinical and radiologic results to those obtained with traditional PSI and CI. The potential economic advantages of single-use instrumentation in primary TKA require further investigation.

Computer-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: Is There a Difference Between Image-Based and Imageless Techniques?

BACKGROUND

Image-based and imageless computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty (CATKA) has become increasingly popular. This study aims to compare outcomes, including perioperative complications and transfusion rate, between CATKA and conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA), as well as between image-based and imageless CATKA.

METHODS

Using the 9th revision of the International Classification of Diseases codes, we queried the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from 2005 to 2011 to identify unilateral conventional TKA, image-based, and imageless CATKAs as well as in-hospital complications and transfusion rates.

RESULTS

A total of 787,809 conventional TKAs and 13,246 CATKAs (1055 image-based and 12,191 imageless) were identified. The rate of CATKA increased 23.13% per year from 2005 to 2011. Transfusion rates in conventional TKA and CATKA cases were 11.73% and 8.20% respectively (P < .001) and 6.92% in image-based vs 8.27% in imageless (P = .023). Perioperative complications occurred in 4.50%, 3.47%, and 3.41% of cases after conventional, imageless, and imaged-based CATKAs, respectively. Using multivariate analysis, perioperative complications were significantly higher in conventional TKA compared to CATKA (odds ratio = 1.17, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.33, P = .01). There was no significant difference between imageless and image-based CATKA (P = .34). Length of hospital stay and hospital charges were not significantly different between groups (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

CATKA has low complication rates and may improve patient outcomes after TKA. CATKA, especially the image-based technique, may reduce in-hospital complications and transfusion without increasing hospital charges and length of hospital stay significantly. Large prospective studies with long follow-up are required to verify potential benefits of CATKA.

Usefulness of an accelerometer-based portable navigation system in total knee arthroplasty

Aims

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of using a portable, accelerometer-based surgical navigation system (KneeAlign2) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on the alignment of the femoral component, and blood loss.

Patients and Methods

A total of 241 consecutive patients with primary osteoarthritis of the knee were enrolled in this prospective, randomised controlled study. There were 207 women and 34 men. The mean age of the patients was 74.0 years (57 to 89). The KneeAlign2 system was used for distal femoral resection in 121 patients (KA2 group) and a conventional intramedullary femoral guide was used in 120 patients (IM group).

Results

One patient (0.8%) in the KA2 group and 19 in the IM group had an alignment which was > 3° away from the neutral mechanical axis (p < 0.01). The mean deviation from neutral alignment was 1.01° (standard deviation (sd) 1.0°) in the KA2 group and 1.93° (sd 1.7°) in the IM group (p < 0.01). Blood loss was significantly less in the KA2 group compared with the IM group (784 ml (sd 357) versus 1071 ml (sd 310), p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The KneeAlign2 system provides a technically straightforward method for identifying the femoral head and performing an accurate distal femoral resection at TKA with significantly less blood loss compared with a conventional intramedullary guide. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1047–52.

Low Incidence of Postoperative Complications With Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

A number of postoperative complications of navigated total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been discussed in the literature, including tracker pin site infection and fracture. In this article, we discuss the low postoperative complication rate in a series of 3100 navigated TKAs and the overall complication rate in a systematic analysis of the literature.

METHODS

Three thousand one hundred consecutive patients with navigated TKAs from 2001-2016 were retrospectively evaluated for complications specific to navigation. We discuss the 2 cases of postoperative fracture through tracker pin sites that we experienced and compare this systematically with the literature.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, our 3100 patient cohort experienced a total of 2 fractures through pin sites for an incidence of 0.065%. One was a distal femoral fracture which was treated surgically, and the other was a proximal tibial fracture treated nonoperatively. Because of our incorporation of the tracker sites within our operative incision, there were no identifiable pin site infections, which others have noted at an incidence of 0.47%. Our 0.065% fracture rate compares favorably with the 0.16% rate of fracture published in the literature.

CONCLUSION

There is an extremely low risk of perioperative complications because of the instrumentation used in navigated TKA when using the Stryker Navigation System and 4.0 mm anchoring pins placed within the surgical incision.

Using Accelerometer-Based Portable Navigation to Perform Accurate Total Knee Arthroplasty Bone Resection in Asian Patients

Implant alignment is an important factor affecting clinical results associated with total knee arthroplasty (TKA). No report exists showing the utility of an accelerometer-based portable navigation system among patients with marked femoral bowing. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a portable navigation system for implant alignment in Asian patients with marked femoral bowing. The authors evaluated 142 consecutive TKAs performed for primary osteoarthritis since July 2013. A portable navigation system was used in 67 knees, and a conventional jig was used in 75 knees. The authors measured the mechanical axis and femoral/tibial component alignments on long-leg radiographs obtained 2 weeks after TKA. In addition, coronal bowing of the lower limb was evaluated. The results were analyzed in the general and marked femoral bowing subgroups. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups for demographic data. The rates of femoral component outliers in the coronal plane for the navigation system and conventional technique were 1.5% and 13.3% (P=.01), respectively. Marked femoral bowing was observed in 73 knees. In the subgroup of patients with marked femoral bowing, femoral coronal alignment and its outliers were more accurate in the navigation group (0%) than in the conventional group (16.2%) (P=.025). This is the first report to show the utility of an accelerometer-based portable navigation system for accurate prosthetic alignment among Asian patients with marked femoral bowing. The navigation system decreased outliers in coronal alignment of the femur, even in cases of marked femoral bowing, but did not increase complications. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(3):e465-e472.].

Patient specific instrumentation versus conventional knee arthroplasty: comparative study

BACKGROUND

The key to a successful knee replacement is restoring normal kinematics with a neutral alignment, thus a hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle of 180° (within 3° limits). Conventional TKR is proven to have excellent results but relies in extensive visual referencing of bony landmarks. Customised cutting blocks provide accurate bone cuts, also lowering the risk of fat embolism, blood loss and operating time.

METHOD

We share our experience comparing two different TKA techniques using patient specific instrumentation (PSI) with the Visionaire knee and conventional instrumentation (CVI) from the same system (Genesis II Smith&Nephew). A total number of 80 knees were divided into two equal groups, 40 PSI and 40 CVI respectively, operated between April 2013 and August 2014. One female patient had bilateral TKR during this period, at six months interval, both with the PSI.

RESULTS

All operated knees had varus deformity, with a mean HKA of 168° (PSI) vs 163° (CVI). We used tranexamic acid (double-dose scheme) and suction drains for 48 hours, with a mean blood drainage in the PSI group of 185 ml and Hb levels of 11.2 g/dl at three days post, compared to 260 ml and 10.7 g/dl in the CVI. Mean blood loss was 3.5 g/dl in PSI, and 4.2 g/dl in the CVI. On the long leg standing radiograph at six weeks, all knees were aligned in frontal plane, with simillar HKA values (178.9° PSI vs 178.6° CVI). Bone cuts measured intraoperatively proved to be accurate within a 1 mm limit.

CONCLUSIONS

We cannot recommend PSI-TKR for a better outcome. It is an alternative to conventional and computer-assisted TKR, but further studies are needed to evaluate weather surgical or economic benefits may be achieved by choosing customised instruments.

Outcome in total knee arthroplasty with a medial-lateral balanced versus unbalanced gap

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical outcome in 108 total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients with a medial-lateral balanced versus unbalanced gap after a mean follow-up of 34 months.

METHODS

64 women and 44 men (mean age, 69.5 years) underwent computer-assisted TKA for osteoarthritis using a cemented fixed-bearing cruciate-retaining prosthesis. The medial-lateral gap difference (measured with the prosthesis in situ and the patella reduced) was balanced (≤2 mm) in 81 patients and unbalanced (>2 mm) in 27 patients. After a mean follow-up of 34 months, patients were assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire for pain, stiffness, and physical function. Scores were normalised to 0% (worst) to 100% (best).

RESULTS

The balanced and unbalanced gap groups were comparable in terms of age, severity of osteoarthritis, and proportion of pre- and post-operative mechanical alignment. Compared with the balanced gap group, the unbalanced gap group had a larger medial-lateral extension gap difference (0.75±0.57 vs. 2.02±1.15 mm, p=0.001) and medial-lateral flexion gap difference (0.79±0.63 vs. 2.98±2.13 mm, p=0.001) and lower normalised total WOMAC score (84.9±18 vs. 74.8±20.8, p=0.017).

CONCLUSION

WOMAC score is better in TKAs with a medial-lateral balanced (<2 mm) gap.

Outcome reporting following navigated high tibial osteotomy of the knee: a systematic review

PURPOSE

This systematic review evaluates radiographic and clinical outcome reporting following navigated high tibial osteotomy (HTO). Conventional HTO was used as a control to compare outcomes and furthermore investigate the quality of evidence in studies reporting outcomes for navigated HTO. It was hypothesized that navigated HTO will show superior clinical and radiographic outcomes compared to conventional HTO.

METHODS

Two independent reviewers searched PubMed, Ovid (MEDLINE), EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for studies reporting outcomes following navigated HTO. Titles, abstracts, and full-text were screened in duplicate using an a priori inclusion and exclusion criteria. Descriptive statistics were calculated using Minitab ^® statistical software. Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies (MINORS) and Cochrane Risk of Bias Scores were used to evaluate methodological quality.

RESULTS

Thirty-four studies which involved 2216 HTOs were analysed in this review, 1608 (72.6 %) navigated HTOs and 608 (27.4 %) conventional HTOs. The majority of studies were of level IV evidence (16). Clinical outcomes were reported in knee and function scores or range of motion comparisons. Postoperative clinical and functional scores were improved by navigated HTO although it is not demonstrated if there is significant improvement compared to conventional HTO. Most common clinical outcome score reported was Lysholm scores (6) which report postoperative scores of 87.8 (standard deviation 5.9) and 88.8 (standard deviation 5.9) for conventional and navigation-assisted HTO, respectively. Radiographic outcomes reported commonly were weight-bearing mechanical axis, coronal plane angle, and posterior tibial slope angle in the sagittal plane. Studies have shown HTO gives significant correction of mechanical alignment and navigated HTO produces significantly less change in posterior tibial slope postoperatively compared to conventional. The mean MINORS for the 17 non-comparative studies was 9/16, and 15/24 for the 14 non-randomized comparative studies.

CONCLUSION

Navigation HTO results in improved mechanical axis alignment and demonstrates significantly better control over the tibial slope angle change postoperatively compared to conventional methods; however, these improvements have not yet been reflected in clinical outcome scores. Overall the studies report HTO does create significantly improved knee scores and functions compared to patients' preoperative ratings regardless of technique. Future studies on HTO outcomes need to focus on consistency of outcome reporting.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Navigation-assisted versus conventional total knee replacement: no difference in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at 1 and 2 years

INTRODUCTION

Navigation technique for total knee replacement has been shown to improve accuracy of prosthesis alignment in several studies. The purpose was to compare the patient-reported outcome measures in primary total knee replacement (TKR) using navigation versus conventional surgical technique at 1- and 2-year follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of prospectively collected patient-reported outcome data for 351 consecutively performed primary TKR was included in the study. The study group (N = 113) included patients who had Triathlon TKR using articular surface mounted (ASM Stryker) navigation technique and control group (N = 238) included patients who had Triathlon TKR using conventional jig. In addition to the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index) and SF-36 (Medical Outcomes Trust Short Form-36), a short self-report questionnaire evaluating the level of satisfaction, quality of life and whether patients would undergo knee replacement again.

RESULTS

WOMAC: no significant difference between the groups was noted in mean WOMAC pain, function and stiffness scores at 1- and 2-year follow-up. SF-36: no significant difference between the groups was seen except in the physical function component of score at 1 year (p = 0.019). Navigation group mean 56.78 (CI 51.06-62.5) versus conventional group mean 48.34 (44.68-52.01) but this difference was not observed at 2-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall patient-reported outcome scores improved after total knee replacement but appear to be comparable in both groups at 1- and 2-year follow-up.

Low incidence of complications in computer assisted total knee arthroplasty--A retrospective review of 1596 cases

BACKGROUND

Computer assisted total knee arthroplasty (CATKA) has its own unique complications. The aim of this study was to present our experience of early complications in a large consecutive series of CATKA.

METHOD

We investigated retrospective data on the complications specific to computer navigation that were encountered with a consecutive series of 1596 CATKA.

RESULTS

Intraoperatively, eight episodes of software failure occurred, two requiring conversion to conventional jig based TKA. There were four broken drill bits when positioning the pins for data entry. Repeat cuts of bone due to malalignment were required on two occasions. There were 17 episodes of superficial pin site infections at the tibial pin-site managed conservatively with antibiotics. One tibial fracture occurred through an old tibial tracker pin site hole.

CONCLUSION

This large study shows a low complication rate related to CATKA which is reassuring to the orthopaedic community.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Level of evidence: III.

Does Computer Assisted Navigation Improve Functional Outcomes and Implant Survivability after Total Knee Arthroplasty?

The objective of this study was to determine whether computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves functional outcomes and implant survivability using data from a large national database. We analysed 9054 primary TKA procedures performed between 2006 and 2012 from the New Zealand National Joint Registry. Functional outcomes were assessed using Oxford Knee Questionnaires at six months and five years. On multivariate analysis, there was no significant difference in mean Oxford Knee Scores between the navigated and non-navigated groups at six months (39.0 vs 38.1, P=0.54) or five years (42.2 vs 42.0, P=0.76). At current follow-up, there was no difference in revision rates between navigated and non-navigated TKA (0.46 vs 0.43 revisions 100 component years, P=0.8).

Computer navigation for total knee arthroplasty reduces revision rate for patients less than sixty-five years of age

BACKGROUND

Computer navigation for total knee arthroplasty has improved alignment compared with that resulting from non-navigated total knee arthroplasty. This study analyzed data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry to examine the effect of computer navigation on the rate of revision of primary total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

The cumulative percent revision following all non-navigated and navigated primary total knee arthroplasties performed in Australia from January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2012, was assessed. In addition, the type of and reason for revision as well as the effect of age, surgeon volume, and use of cement for the prosthesis were examined. Kaplan-Meier estimates of survivorship were used to describe the time to first revision. Hazard ratios (HRs) from Cox proportional hazards models, with adjustment for age and sex, were used to compare revision rates.

RESULTS

Computer navigation was used in 44,573 (14.1% of all) primary total knee arthroplasties, and the rate of its use increased from 2.4% in 2003 to 22.8% in 2012. Overall, the cumulative percent revision following non-navigated total knee arthroplasty at nine years was 5.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.1 to 5.4) compared with 4.6% (95% CI = 4.2 to 5.1) for computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty (HR = 1.05 [95% CI = 0.98 to 1.12], p = 0.15). There was a significant difference in the rate of revision following non-navigated total knee arthroplasty compared with that following navigated total knee arthroplasty for younger patients (HR = 1.13 [95% CI = 1.03 to 1.25], p = 0.011). Patients less than sixty-five years of age who had undergone non-navigated total knee arthroplasty had a cumulative percent revision of 7.8% (95% CI = 7.5 to 8.2) at nine years compared with 6.3% (95% CI = 5.5 to 7.3) for those who had undergone navigated total knee arthroplasty. Computer navigation led to a significant reduction in the rate of revision due to loosening/lysis (HR = 1.38 [95% CI = 1.13 to 1.67], p = 0.001), which is the most common reason for revision of total knee arthroplasty.

CONCLUSIONS

Computer navigation reduced the overall rate of revision and the rate revision for loosening/lysis following total knee arthroplasty in patients less than sixty-five years of age.

Inconsistencies between navigation data and radiographs in total knee arthroplasty are system-dependent and affect coronal alignment

BACKGROUND

Few studies have compared the effect of different computer navigation systems on postoperative alignment in patients who have had total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We examined 2 computed tomography (CT)-free computer navigation systems by comparing the accuracy of intraoperative measurements to postoperative alignment.

METHODS

Patients underwent unilateral TKA performed by a single surgeon using 1 of 2 CT-free navigation systems. We compared final intraoperative tibial and femoral coronal angles and mechanical axis with the same angles measured on standing postoperative radiographs.

RESULTS

Groups of 31 and 50 patients underwent TKA with the 2 systems, respectively. We noted a significant difference in the coronal tibial implant angle (1.29º ± 1.35º) and in the mechanical axis (1.59º ± 2.36º) for one navigation system (both p < 0.001), while only the coronal tibial implant angle showed a significant difference (1.17º ± 1.65º, p < 0.001) for the second system. The number of radiographic outliers also significantly differed. A significantly higher proportion (32%; p < 0.01) of patients in the second cohort exhibited unacceptable malalignment compared with the first cohort (24%).

CONCLUSION

Navigation systems for TKA continue to increase in sophistication and popularity. Owing to the significant difference in the proportion of alignment outliers in the 2 navigation systems tested in this study, orthopedic surgeons should not consider all TKA navigation systems equivalent. Additional investigations are needed to compare the accuracy of a variety of CT-free and CT-based navigation systems and to confirm our finding that accuracy is system-dependent.

Electromagnetic navigation in total knee arthroplasty-a single center, randomized, single-blind study comparing the results with conventional techniques

We report on the results of a randomized study (n=200) to compare total knee arthroplasty performed using conventional instrumentation or electromagnetic computer assisted surgical technique. 92% of navigated and 85% of conventional knees were implanted within ±3° from neutral mechanical alignment; there was no statistically significant difference between these proportions. There was also no difference in femoral or tibial rotation assessed by CT scan. At 1year follow up there was no statistical difference between the two groups in American Knee Society Score, Oxford Knee Scores, patient satisfaction, quality of life, hospital length of stay, complication rates or other adverse events. Tourniquet time in the navigated group was longer. Proving value for navigation in total knee arthroplasty surgery remains a challenge.

Intra-operative deviation in limb alignment occurring at implantation in total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Long-term survival of knee replacement depends on accurate alignment. Despite improvements in cut accuracy mal-alignment of 3° or more is still seen. All methods share common implantation techniques. This study examines the effect of implantation on overall limb alignment relating it to cut alignment and trial alignment.

METHODS

A retrospective review of navigated primary knee replacements was undertaken (n=113). Overall coronal limb alignments for the aggregated cuts, trial and final implanted components were examined.

RESULTS

All 113 knees had coronal aggregated cut alignment within 2° of neutral (range: 2° varus to 2° valgus). With trial components 99 knees (88%) had an overall coronal limb alignment within 2° of neutral (range: 3° varus to 4° valgus). After final implantation 106 knees (94%) were within 2° of neutral (range: 4° varus to 4° valgus). Forty eight knees (42%) showed no alignment deviation occurring between trial and the final implanted prostheses and 16 knees (14%) shoed a deviation of 2° or more. There was a correlation of both aggregated cut (r=0.284, p=0.002) and trial (r=0.794, p<0.001) with final alignment. There was no significant difference between the final alignment and the aggregated cut alignment(mean difference=-0.15°, p=0.254) or trial alignment (mean difference -0.13°, p=0.155).

CONCLUSIONS

Even when the aggregated alignment produced by the bone cuts is accurate, inaccuracy in final alignment can result from the implantation process. It may be productive for surgeons to concentrate on the implantation process to improve alignment and reduce outliers.

Computed tomography evaluation in total knee arthroplasty: computer-assisted navigation versus conventional instrumentation in patients with advanced valgus arthritic knees

Arthritic knees with advanced valgus deformity present with soft tissue and osseous anomalies that make total knee arthroplasty (TKA) difficult. We conducted a retrospective chart review of 41 patients (51 knees) to determine whether computer-assisted surgery-TKA (CAS-TKA) is superior to TKA using conventional guiding systems. A significantly higher rate of lateral retinaculum release as well as outlier of sagittal mechanical axes and position of the femoral component (femoral flexion and femoral rotational angle) was recorded in the conventional TKA group versus the CAS-TKA group. Both groups had significant postoperative improvement in clinical performance, but results did not differ significantly between groups. Despite its radiographic benefit, CAS-TKA showed no significant benefit over TKA in short-term clinical functional outcomes when performed by an experienced surgeon.

Differences in component and limb alignment between computer-assisted and conventional surgery total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Marked coronal femoral bowing may bear a risk for mal-alignment of femoral component and reconstructed mechanical axis (MA) by using conventional instrumentations. The aim of this study was to investigate the usefulness of computer-assisted surgery-total knee arthroplasty (CAS-TKA) under this circumstance.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients with osteoarthritic knee and marked coronal femoral bowing who underwent TKA at our institution. The CAS-TKA and the conventional techniques were compared by radiographic parameters in coronal and sagittal planes, and rotational alignment of femoral component was assessed by computed tomography (CT) scans. The Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) and International Knee Society (IKS) scores were obtained for all patients preoperatively and at the last follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 65 knees were enrolled in this study. Twenty-eight TKAs implanted using a CT-free navigation system, and the remaining 37 TKAs implanted using the conventional technique. CAS-TKAs were more consistent than conventional TKAs in aiding proper postoperative MA and ideal alignments of femoral component in the coronal and sagittal planes. However, CAS-TKA group was not obtained at significantly higher rates of femoral component in axial plane. At a mean follow-up of 43 months, there was no significant difference in HSS and IKS scores between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although CAS-TKA did not have superior functional outcomes in the short-term follow-up, proper coronal and sagittal alignment of femoral component and postoperative MA were obtained in patients with marked coronal femoral bowing. The long-term follow-up will be needed to clarify the eventual benefits.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective comparative study, Level III.

Comparison of computer-navigated and conventional total knee arthroplasty in patients with Ranawat type-II valgus deformity: medium-term clinical and radiological results

Background

Arthritic knees with Ranawat type-II valgus deformity present with soft tissue contracture and osseous anomalies that make total knee arthroplasty (TKA) difficult. We hypothesized that computer-navigated-TKA (CN-TKA) may be superior to conventional techniques and provide better mid-term radiographic and clinical outcomes in such cases.

Methods

Between January 2002 and January 2009, patients with Ranawat type-II valgus deformity who underwent primary TKA were entered into this retrospective study. Conventional TKA and CN-TKA were compared for the accuracy of component placement, joint line level, and postoperative limb alignment. International Knee Society scores and patellar scores were used for clinical assessment.

Results

A total of 62 patients (70 knees) with a minimum of 5 years of follow-up were studied. Conventional TKA was performed in 36 knees and CN-TKA in 34 knees. A significantly higher rate of lateral retinaculum release was recorded in the conventional TKA group compared to the CN-TKA group. Proper restoration of joint line was achieved using CN-TKA. The range of motion of the knees was similar in both groups preoperative and postoperatively. There were no significant differences in reconstructed mechanical axes, accuracy of component positioning, and difference in perioperative hemoglobin level between the two groups. At a mean follow-up of 6.2 years, both groups had significant postoperative improvements in clinical performance, however the difference did not reach statistical significance between both techniques.

Conclusions

Our findings demonstrate that CN-TKA can properly restored the joint line level for arthritic knees with Ranawat type II valgus deformity. However, no differences in clinical function, limb and component alignment, or survival of the prostheses were noted between the CN-TKA and conventional TKA groups at a mean follow-up of 6.2 years.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2474-15-390) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: a literature review

During the past decade, total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been markedly increased. Recently, patient-specific custom cutting guides have been commercially introduced in order to achieve an accurate component alignment during TKA. In fact, these cutting blocks are specific to a patient's knee anatomy and should help the surgeons to perform bone cuts, reducing the complexity of conventional alignment and sizing tools. Nevertheless, there are critical arguments against patient-specific cutting guides for routine use, such as poor evidence and higher costs. Additionally, there are still no mild and long-term results available that describe the clinical outcomes following patient-specific instrumentation of TKR, cost-effectiveness and lower revision rates. Aim of the current manuscript was to describe the recent improvements of the surgical technique and instrumentation of TKA, reviewing the recent literature concerning the PSI technology.

Conventional versus computer-assisted technique for total knee arthroplasty: a minimum of 5-year follow-up of 200 patients in a prospective randomized comparative trial

In the literature, studies of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after mid-term period are not conclusive and long-term data are rare. In a prospective, randomized, comparative study 100 conventional TKAs (group REG) were compared with 100 computer-assisted TKAs (group NAV). Minimum follow-up was 5years. No difference in implant failure was found with 1.1% in group NAV versus 4.6% in group REG (P=0.368). Group NAV showed a significantly less mean deviation of mechanical limb axis (P=0.015), more TKAs (90% versus 81% in group REG) were within 3° varus/valgus and a higher tibial slope and lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) accuracy was found (P≤0.034). Clinical investigational parameters showed no differences (P≥0.058). Insall and HSS score total were also higher in group NAV (P≤0.016).

Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty provides no improvement in component alignment

Improved component alignment in TKA remains a commonly cited benefit of MRI based patient-specific instrumentation (PSI). We hypothesized that PSI would lead to improved alignment versus traditional instrumentation (TI) during primary TKA. Fifty-eight knees (54 patients) that underwent TKA with PSI were compared to 62 knees that had previously undergone TKA with TI. Radiographs were evaluated for mechanical axis and alignment of the femoral and tibial components. Alignment was similar between the groups. However, the PSI group showed fewer knees in the target range for posterior tibial slope (PSI 38% vs. TI 61%, P=0.01) in addition to a trend for fewer knees in target range for femoral flexion (PSI 40% vs. TI 56%, P=0.07). This study demonstrated no improvement in overall alignment and perhaps a worsening of the tibial slope.

Does total knee arthroplasty modify flexion axis of the knee?

PURPOSE

To prospectively investigate whether preoperative functional flexion axis in patients with osteoarthritis- and varus-alignment changes after total knee arthroplasty and whether a correlation exists both between preoperative functional flexion axis and native limb deformity.

METHODS

A navigated total knee arthroplasty was performed in 108 patients using a specific software to acquire passive joint kinematics before and after implant positioning. The knee was cycled through three passive range of motions, from 0° to 120°. Functional flexion axis was computed using the mean helical axis algorithm. The angle between the functional flexion axis and the surgical transepicondylar axis was determined on frontal (α (F)) and axial (α (A)) plane. The pre- and postoperative hip-knee-ankle angle, related to femur mechanical axis, was determined.

RESULTS

Postoperative functional flexion axis was different from preoperative only on frontal plane, while no differences were found on axial plane. No correlation was found between preoperative α (A) and native limb deformity, while a poor correlation was found in frontal plane, between α (F) and preoperative hip-knee-ankle angle.

CONCLUSIONS

Total knee arthroplasty affects functional flexion axis only on frontal plane while has no effect on axial plane. Preoperative functional flexion axis is in a more varus position respect to the transepicondylar axis both in pre- and postoperative conditions. Moreover, the position of the functional axis on frontal plane in preoperative conditions is dependent on native limb alignment, while on axial plane is not dependent on the amount of preoperative varus deformity.