Does pelvic osteolysis occur with a nonmodular uncemented acetabular component?

Technical note: acetabular augmentation with customisable cementless all-polyethylene insert

Acetabular augmentation is a challenge for complex primary and revision hip surgery. Several methods exist to recreate a supportive, hemispherical acetabulum where a defect exists, however, these can be complex, expensive, time consuming, and limited by available size and shape. We present a simple, inexpensive, quick and customisable method of acetabular augmentation using cementless polyethylene with titanium coating. The first case is presented with follow-up up to 8 years.

The 45-year evolution of the Mathys RM monoblock cups: have the paradigm shifts been worthwhile?

INTRODUCTION

The Robert Mathys (RM) monoblock uncemented cup is a design less commonly used in primary total hip replacement. It's purported advantages over modular cemented cups are: (1) its modulus of elasticity approximating bone, thus mimicking load transmission and the biomechanical behaviour of the cup to better match stresses on the acetabulum, leading to bone-preservation; and (2) as a 1-piece cup there is absence of a mobile interface between a liner and shell, preventing backside wear. Since its inception in 1983 there have been 3 major design changes: the RM Classic, the RM Pressfit, and the RM Vitamys with the most modern polyethylene (vitamin E).

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort study of the New Zealand Joint Registry, all designs of RM acetabular cup were reviewed. Data were included from1998 to 2018. All-cause revision rates, reasons for revision and the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) were assessed.

RESULTS

In total 13,272 acetabular cups were included. The all-cause revision rates did not differ between the designs. Revision rates for aseptic loosening in the RM Vitamys were lower, but the follow-up was shorter and more larger heads were used. There was no difference in the OHS.

CONCLUSION

All implant designs were safe. The use of larger heads led to a decrease in revisions due to dislocation. It has to be waited out whether the RM Vitamys performs superior in the long-term due to the highly cross-linked polyethylene.

Liner type has no impact on bone mineral density changes around a 3D printed trabecular titanium acetabular component

BACKGROUND

Three-dimensional printing of implants allows the ability to produce implants and interfaces which theoretically better mimic "normal" bone behaviour, leading to a possible reduction in stress shielding thus maintaining bone mineral density (BMD). This issue was not investigated in vivo using bone scan and different bearings; therefore, we did a prospective study aiming to answer: 1) is there a loss of BMD around the 3D printed trabecular titanium cup, when compared to the native hip?; 2) does liner type influence the BMD changes around the acetabulum when a 3D printed trabecular titanium cup is used?

HYPOTHESIS

BMD changes around the acetabulum are not influenced by the liner type, and the cup will be associated with a reduction in BMD when compared to the native hip.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a prospective observational study of patients receiving a primary total hip arthroplasty. A 3D printed trabecular titanium uncemented acetabular component was used in all cases. All patients received a ceramic femoral head, with either a ceramic or polyethylene acetabular liner. BMD measurements using DXA were performed at 6 weeks, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery to evaluate remodeling changes. The 3 acetabular regions of interest (ROI) of DeLee and Charnley were used for serial comparisons of peri-acetabular BMD. The study was powered as a non-inferiority study with the principle variables compared using a two-step repeated analysis of variance.

RESULTS

A total of 48 consecutive patients were included in the study, with all patients completing their 2 year follow-up. There were no failures, revisions or complications within this cohort. We found no statistically significant difference in the BMD change scores between the operated and the native hip in any of the 3 ROI zones. We found no differences in BMD scores when comparing ceramic to polyethylene acetabular liners, head sizes and BMI.

DISCUSSION

This study shows a similar pattern of BMD behaviour around a 3D printed cup when compared to the contralateral native hip. We were unable to show a clinical or radiological difference between the bearing material, head size, or BMI when used with this type of acetabular component.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; prospective comparative study.

Long-Term Results of Total Hip Arthroplasty with RM Classic Cups

Relevance. The RM Classic monoblock titanium-coated polyethylene cup is widely used in the total hip arthroplasty. However, so far in Russia there has been no analysis of follow-up over 10 years for a limited number of patients in a single hospital. The aim of the study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of total hip replacement with RM Classic acetabular component. Materials and Methods. The outcomes of 328 total hip arthroplasties (289 patients operated in the period from 1997 to 2007) with RM Classic cups were evaluated in a monocentral retrospective clinical study. The average follow-up period was 14.4 years. Revision procedure due to aseptic loosening, polyethylene wear or osteolysis was considered as the end point of the study. Results. 9 revisions during the short and medium follow-up periods (up to 10 years) were associated with malpositioning of RM Classic components and errors in surgical technique. The indications for later revision THA (19 cases) were polyethylene wear and aseptic loosening. Only in one case they were combined with pelvic bone osteolysis with the formation of III a defect according to W.G. Paprosky classification. Within 15 years the Kaplan-Meier survivorship of RM Classic cup was 92.5%. There was a statistically significant difference of the survival curves in the ceramic-on-poly against metal-on-poly bearings: 94.9% and 79.4%, respectively. The average Harris Hip Score was 88.6. Conclusion. RM Classic uncemented monoblock cup has proven its high efficiency and survival in 15 years follow-up period and over.

Cementless RM Pressfit Cup: a clinical and radiological study of 91 cases with at least four years follow-up

Cementless metal-back acetabular cups have good long-term results, but some problems have appeared due to the shell's stiffness, modularity and required bearing surfaces. The RM Pressfit Cup is a single-piece polyethylene cementless acetabular cup that is covered by a thin layer of titanium. This allows for bone integration without limitations related to the stiffness of a metal-back shell. There is very little published information about this new, innovative implant design. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological results from a continuous series of 91 cups (85 patients) with a follow-up of at least 4 years. No patients were lost to follow-up. The Harris Hip Score (HHS) was used to assess the clinical outcome. To assess the radiological outcomes, digital X-rays were used to evaluate the cup position and integration; wear was measured using Livermore's technique. The clinical results were excellent: the mean HHS was 94 and 82% of cases had good or excellent scores. Three of the cups had to be revised because of dislocation brought on by incorrect positioning. X-rays revealed that three implants had shifted during the first 6 weeks, but had stabilized afterwards. Bone integration on X-rays was satisfactory in all cases with no signs of osteolysis. The configuration of the bone trabeculae showed that loads between the implant and peri-acetabular cancellous bone were evenly distributed. The wear of the polyethylene cup-ceramic head bearing was 0.07 mm/year. The results of this series are consistent with recent published studies with the RM Pressfit Cup.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Do monoblock cups improve survivorship, decrease wear, or reduce osteolysis in uncemented total hip arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

Monoblock acetabular components used in uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) have certain mechanical characteristics that potentially reduce acetabular osteolysis and polyethylene wear. However, the degree to which they achieve this goal is not well documented.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The purpose of this study was to use a systematic review of controlled trials to test the hypothesis that monoblock cups have superior (1) polyethylene wear rate; (2) frequency of cup migration; (3) frequency of acetabular osteolysis; and (4) frequency of aseptic loosening compared with modular components used in uncemented THA.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane electronic databases to assemble all controlled trials comparing monoblock with modular uncemented acetabular components in primary THA. Included studies were considered "best evidence" if the quality score was either ≥ 50% on the Cochrane Back Review Group checklist or ≥ 75% the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale. A total of seven publications met our inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Best evidence analysis showed no difference in polyethylene wear rate, the frequency of cup migration, and aseptic loosening between monoblock and modular acetabular components. No convincing evidence was found for the claim that lower frequencies of acetabular osteolysis are observed with the use of monoblock cups compared with modular uncemented cups.

CONCLUSIONS

The purported benefits of monoblock cups were not substantiated by this systematic review of controlled studies in that polyethylene wear rates and frequencies of cup failure and acetabular osteolysis were similar to those observed with modular implants. Other factors should therefore drive implant selection in cementless THA.

A cementless elastic monoblock socket in young patients: a ten to 18-year clinical and radiological follow-up

The survival of acetabular components depends on several factors: wear, osteolysis and septic or aseptic loosening. Osteolysis seems to be the main cause for concern in cementless arthroplasties. Acetabular osteolysis results from particle debris and segmental unloading of acetabular bone by rigid sockets. We investigated a cementless elastic monoblock socket with regard to acetabular osteolysis and aseptic loosening in a cohort of young patients. We evaluated 158 hip arthroplasties with a minimum follow-up of ten years (ten to 18) and a mean age of 42 years (18–50). The overall revision rate at 14 years was 80% with a 98% survival rate for aseptic loosening. The mean polyethylene wear rate was 0.11 mm/year. Progressive acetabular osteolysis was seen in 3% of patients evaluated. In conclusion, we found low pelvic osteolysis rates, acceptable overall wear rates, satisfactory overall survival and excellent survival rates for aseptic loosening of a cementless elastic monoblock socket in patients younger than 50 years. Ongoing tribology developments and knowledge about acetabular bone adaptations behind acetabular implants will further lower wear and osteolysis rates and optimise survival rates of cementless sockets.