Tibial component fixation in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of pegged and stemmed designs

Impact of patient, surgical, and implant design factors on predicted tray-bone interface micromotions in cementless total knee arthroplasty

Micromotion magnitudes exceeding 150 µm may prevent bone formation and limit fixation after cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Many factors influence the tray-bone interface micromotion but the critical parameters and sensitivities are less clear. In this study, we assessed the impacts of surgical (tray alignment, tibial coverage, and resection surface preparation), patient (bone properties and tibiofemoral kinematics), and implant design (tray feature and surface friction) factors on tray-bone interface micromotions during a series of activities of daily living. Micromotion was estimated via three previously validated implant-bone finite element models and tested under gait, deep knee bending, and stair descent loads. Overall, the average micromotion across the tray-bone cementless contact interface ranged from 9.3 to 111.4 µm, and peak micromotion was consistently found along the anterior tray edge. Maximizing tibial coverage above a properly sized tibial tray (an average of 12.3% additional area) had minimal impact on micromotion. A 1 mm anterior tray alignment change reduced the average micromotion by an average of 16.1%. Two-degree tibial angular resection errors reduced the area for bone ingrowth up to 48.1%. Differences on average micromotion from ±25% changes in bone moduli were up to 75.5%. A more posterior tibiofemoral contact due to additional 100 N posterior force resulted in an average of 79.3% increase on average micromotion. Overall, careful surgical technique, patient selection, and controlling kinematics through articular design all contribute meaningfully to minimizing micromotion in cementless TKA, with centralizing the load transfer to minimize the resulting moment at the anterior tray perimeter a consistent theme.

Early aseptic loosening of the tibial component at the cement-implant interface in total knee arthroplasty: a narrative overview of potentially associated factors

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a highly effective surgical procedure, but in some patients TKAs fail early due to a variety of underlying factors. About 11% of revision TKAs within one year of primary TKA are the result of aseptic loosening of the tibial component at the cement-implant interface. Literature regarding the most important factors associated with this type of loosening is scarce. The objective is to give an overview of the literature regarding factors associated with aseptic loosening of the tibia component at the cement-implant interface in total knee arthroplasty. A narrative literature review based on publications identified through PubMed and CINAHL databases. Twelve studies were identified, which describe a total of 299 cases of early aseptic loosening of the tibia component at the cement-implant interface. The main associated factors reported were cementa- tion factors. These factors included the use of high viscosity cement (HVC), cement application methods and cement thickness. Other main reported associated factor related to implant design factors, which included component shape and surface roughness. The least frequently reported associated factors related to the patient characteristics of body mass index (BMI). Several factors associated with early aseptic loosening of the tibial component at the cement-implant interface in total knee arthroplasty were identified in this review. The most frequently reported associated factors related to cementation factors and implant design factors. Because the literature in this area is scarce, further research is warranted in an effort to prevent early aseptic loosening in future TKAs.

Towards a Standard Approach to Assess Tibial Bone Loss Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

Long-term implant failure in the form of aseptic loosening and periprosthetic fracture is the most common cause of revision procedures in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). While early loosening can often be attributed to failure of primary fixation, late implant failure could be associated with loss of fixation secondary to bone resorption, as a result of stress shielding in the proximal tibia. This current review study was performed to identify the clinical effects of different implant-, patient-, and surgery-related biomechanical factors on TKA-related tibial bone loss in clinical reality. Implant-related factors considered were the fixation method, and the implant type, geometry, and stiffness. In terms of patient characteristics, the effects of age, sex, knee alignment, bone density, body weight, and activity level were analyzed. The clinical literature on these topics mostly concerned longitudinal radiographic studies investigating the effect of a single factor on changes in the proximal tibia over time using bone densitometry. Implant stiffness, implant geometry and knee alignment were the only factors consistently found to affect regional bone density changes over time. Each clinical study used its own specific study design, with different definitions used for the baseline density, time points of baseline and follow-up measurements, and regions of interest. Due to the differences in study design, direct comparison between the clinical impact of different biomechanical factors was not possible. Based on the findings over the densitometry studies, a standardized guideline was proposed to allow reliable comparison between consistently reported outcome of future radiographic TKA studies.

Reduced Aseptic Loosening With Fully Cemented Short-Stemmed Tibial Components in Primary Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Recently, the use of short tibial stems in the obese population undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been proposed. Thus, we designed a study to assess tibial component survivorship after primary TKA using a single implant both with and without a fully cemented stem extension performed by a single surgeon.

METHODS

A search of our institutional research database was performed. A minimum 2-year follow-up was selected. Cohorts were created according to patient body mass index (BMI; >40 kg/m² and <40 kg/m²) and the presence (stemmed tibia [ST]) or absence (non-stemmed tibia [NST]) of a short tibial stem extension. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses for aseptic loosening and log-rank tests were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 236 patients were identified (ST = 162, NST = 74). Baseline patient characteristics were statistically similar between cohorts with the exception of BMI which was greater in the ST cohort (32.9 kg/m², 30.6 kg/m²; P = .01). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis at 5 years was superior for the BMI < 40 kg/m² cohort (98.9%, 93.1%; P = .045), the ST cohort (100%, 94.5%; P = .006), and the BMI > 40 kg/m² with ST cohort at 4 years (71.4%, 100%; P = .008).

CONCLUSION

Morbid obesity and a short native tibial stem design appear to be associated with aseptic loosening in primary TKA. This appears to be mitigated through the use of an ST. As such, the use of ST may be considered in at-risk patients. Alternatively, implants with longer native stem designs can be employed. Modern short-stemmed tibial components may need to be redesigned.

Higher Risk of Loosening for a Four-Pegged TKA Tibial Baseplate Than for a Stemmed One: A Register-based Study

BACKGROUND

Modern modular implants allow surgeons to mix different combinations of components within the same brand. From 1999 to 2012, the NexGen®-CR Option femoral component, together with a NexGen® Option Stemmed tibial plate (stemmed baseplate), which uses a short central stem, was the most-frequently used NexGen® combination in the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. However, from 1999 to 2012, the same femoral component was also used along with the NexGen® Precoat four-pegged tibial baseplate (pegged baseplate). Considering the difference in the fixation concepts for these two tibial baseplates, we wanted to study whether their revision rates differed.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

To investigate the difference in (1) all-cause revision and (2) the risk of revision for aseptic loosening between the NexGen® pegged and stemmed baseplates when used with the NG-CR Option femoral component and the same two types of inserts.

METHODS

The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register provided data. The register, which was started in 1975, has since 1999 registered part numbers for individual implant components, allowing it to assess the combinations of components used in each patient. It has been shown to have high completeness (97%) and validity [12, 15]. The inclusion period was 1999 to 2012; during that time, 137,143 primary knee arthroplasties were registered, of which 125,094 were TKAs. Only TKAs performed for osteoarthritis and without patellar resurfacing were included, since not resurfacing the patella is the standard procedure in Sweden. This left 15,287 knees with the stemmed baseplate and 2479 with the pegged baseplate, or 12% and 2% of the total number of TKAs, respectively. Two general hospitals used the pegged baseplate exclusively during that period. Thus, specific patients were not selected for having the pegged plate. The mean age, mortality, and length of followup were similar for the two groups.We used the Kaplan-Meier statistics to calculate the cumulative revision rate (CRR) and Cox regression to compare risk ratios after adjusting for age and sex. The end point was a knee revision for respective all causes or aseptic loosening. The study ended on December 31, 2016. Due to the free healthcare system in Sweden it is highly unusual for patients to seek elective revision abroad, and by use of the extensive Swedish census register, we estimate the level of followup approximately 97%.

RESULTS

Knees with the pegged baseplate had a higher risk for all-cause revision than did those with the stemmed baseplate (5.8% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 4-8.3] and 3% [95% CI, 2.6-3.5] at 15 years; p = 0.003). After controlling for age and sex, the aseptic loosening risk in the pegged baseplate group was still higher than that in the stemmed group (relative risk, 5.40; 95% CI, 3.64-8.02; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this Swedish registry study, we observed a higher loosening risk with the pegged baseplate than the stemmed one, even after controlling for age and sex. Because this was only a comparison of implants from one vendor, and because there may have been other between-group differences for which we could not fully control, this concerning finding should be explored using data from other registries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Influence of stems and metaphyseal sleeve on primary stability of cementless revision tibial trays used to reconstruct AORI IIB defects

Metaphyseal augments, such as sleeves, have been introduced to augment the fixation of revision total knee replacement (rTKR) components, and can be used with or without a stem. The effect of sleeve size in combination with stems on the primary stability and load transfer of a rTKR implant in AORI type IIB defects where the defect involves both condyles are poorly understood. The aim of this study was to examine the primary stability of revision tibial tray augmented with a sleeve in an AORI type IIB defect which involves both condyles with loss of cortical and cancellous bone. Finite element models were generated from computed tomography (CT) scans of nine individuals. All the bones used in the study had an AORI type IIB defect. The cohort included eight females (mean weight: 64 kg, height: 1.6 m). Material properties were sampled from CT data and assigned to the FE model. Joint contact forces for level gait, stair descent, and squat were applied. Stemless sleeved implants under various loading conditions were shown to have adequate primary stability in all AORI type IIB defects investigated. Adding a stem only marginally improved the primary stability of the implant but reduced the strain in the metaphysis compared to stemless implants. Once good initial mechanical stability was established with a sleeve, there was no benefit, in terms of primary stability or bone strains, from increasing sleeve size. This study suggests that metaphyseal sleeves, without a stem, can provide the required primary stability required by a rTKR tibial implant, to reconstruct an AORI type IIB defect. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res.

Incidence, indications, outcomes, and survivorship of stems in primary total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The indications, incidence, outcomes, and survivorship of stems in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are lacking in the contemporary literature. Our hypothesis is stems in primary TKA would result in worse outcomes and survivorship.

METHODS

All primary TKAs between 2007 and 2011 with 2-year follow-up were identified. Revision TKA or UKA conversion was excluded. Demographic information (age, sex, race, BMI, primary diagnosis, and Charlson-Deyo comorbidity index), outcome measures including KOOS and WOMAC, and any revisions were identified from the registry. A 2:1 matched cohort of non-stemmed/stemmed primary TKA patients was created to compare revision rates and outcomes at baseline and 2 years post-TKA. Subgroup analyses of long versus short stems, 1 versus 2 stems, and cemented versus hybrid stem fixation were completed. Two-sample t tests and Chi-square tests were used to compare conventional and stemmed TKA groups.

RESULTS

The registry review included 13,507 conventional TKA and 318 stemmed TKA resulting in an incidence of 2.3 % in primary TKA. The mean follow-up was approximately 49 months in both groups. No difference was found in revision rates between stemmed TKA (2.5 %) and conventional TKA (2.2 %). Patients with post-traumatic arthritis had an odds ratio of 10.5 (95 % CI 1.2-15.3) of receiving stems. Stem length did not affect revision rates. Patients with two stems had worse KOOS and WOMAC scores at baseline which equalized to single-stem patients at 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of stems may provide a survival benefit in complex primary TKA over the short term and no adverse effect on patient outcomes or satisfaction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Clinical Outcomes Following the Use of Constrained Condylar Knees in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Certain clinical or adverse intraoperative situations require the use of increased constraint in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). These include significant angular deformities causing incompetent collateral ligaments, or inadvertent intraoperative injury to collateral structures as well as the inability to achieve a balanced flexion and extension gap. Clinical success has been described with the use of constrained condylar knee arthroplasty in the primary setting in these situations. Traditionally, increasing constraint has been in conjunction with intramedullary stems, referred to as stemmed constrained condylar knees (SCCK); however, some devices provide an intermediary option by increasing constraint without the use of stems, herein referred to as nonstemmed constrained condylar knees (NSCCK). The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of both these devices in primary TKA in terms of revision rates and change in outcome measures over the follow-up period.

METHODS

Between 2007 and 2012, 85 SCCKs and 354 NSCCKs were identified in our institutional registry database performed in the primary TKA setting with minimum 2-year clinical outcome measure follow-up. Baseline demographic information, as well as Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and Lower Extremity Activity Scale (LEAS) were collected preoperatively at 2-year follow-up. Revision data were also collected.

RESULTS

Both groups showed substantial improvement in WOMAC scores (pain, stiffness, and function), and LEAS at 2 years postoperatively compared with baseline, although the changes in scores were not statistically significant. One of 85 SCCKs (1.17%) was revised for infection, whereas 9 of 354 NSCCKs (2.54%) were revised (6 for mechanical complications, eg, loosening, 2 for periprosthetic fracture, and 1 for infection).

CONCLUSION

Both cohorts demonstrated improvement in clinical outcome measures at 2-year follow-up. None of the SCCKs performed in the primary setting were revised for a mechanical complication. Although both groups had overall low revision rates, there was trend toward a higher revision rate with NSCCKs. Many of these were revised for component loosening. In summary, when necessary, constrained options in the primary TKA setting provide excellent clinical outcome at short-term follow-up. However, constrained constructs with stemmed fixation may provide more rigid fixation and be less susceptible to mechanical failure.

Tibial revision knee arthroplasty with metaphyseal sleeves: The effect of stems on implant fixation and bone flexibility

Introduction

Revision total knee arthoplasty often requires modular implants to treat bone defects of varying severity. In some cases, it may not be clear which module size and implant combination (e.g. sleeve and stem) should be chosen for a specific defect. When balancing implant stability and osseointegration against stress-shielding, it is important to choose an appropriate implant combination in order to match the given level of bone loss. Therefore, the necessity of stems in less extensive tibial defects and the advantage of different stems (lengths and stiffnesses) in combination with large metaphyseal sleeves on implant fixation and bone flexibility using a modular tibial revision knee system, were analyzed.

Materials and methods

Four different stem combinations for a tibial revision implant (Sigma TC3, DePuy) were compared to an intact bone. Standardized implantation with n = 4 synthetic tibial bones was performed after generating an Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) Type T1 bone defect. Axial torques around the longitudinal stem axis and varus-valgus torques were separately applied to the implant. Micromotions of bone and implant were tracked using a digital image correlation system to calculate relative micromotions at the implant-bone-interface and bone deformation.

Results

Overall, using stems reduced the proximal micromotions of tray and sleeve compared to no stem, while reducing bone deformation proximally at the same time, indicating some potential for proximal stress-shielding compared to no stem. The potential for increased proximal stress-shield due to reduced proximal deformation appeared to be greater when using the longer stems. The location of lowest relative micromotions was also more distal when using long stems as opposed to short stems. A short stem (especially a smaller diameter short stem which still achieves diaphyseal fixation) displayed less potential for stress-shielding, but greater bone deformation distal to the tip of the stem than in the natural model.

Discussion

In the case of tibial revision implants with metaphyseal sleeves in a simple fully contained Type I defect, the absence of a stem provides for more natural bone deformation. However, adding a stem reduces overall relative micromotions, while introducing some risk of proximal stress-shielding due to increased diaphyseal fixation. Increasing stem length intensifies this effect. Short stems offered a balance between reduced micromotions and more proximal bone deformation that reduced the potential for stress-shielding when compared to long stems. A short stem with slightly smaller diameter (simulating a less stiff stem which still has diaphyseal fixation) increased the proximal bone deformation, but also tended to increase the bone deformation even further at the distal stem’s tip.

Conclusion

In conclusion, further investigation should be conducted on fully contained Type I defects and the addition of a stem to offer better initial stability, taking into account stem length (i.e. shorter or more flexible stems) to support metaphyseal fixation and allowing bending found in intact bone. In addition, further study into more extensive tibial defects is required to determine if the stability/micromotion trends observed in this study with stems and sleeves in Type I defects still apply in cases of extensive proximal bone loss.

Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Cementless Porous Tantalum Monoblock Tibial Component: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was introduced to improve the longevity of implants but has yet to be widely adopted because of reports of higher failure rates in some series. The cementless tantalum monoblock tibial component, in contrast, has shown successful short-term results, but long-term survivorship with this design is still lacking. The purpose of this study was to investigate the minimum 10-year clinical and radiographic results of the cementless tantalum monoblock tibial component in primary TKA.

METHODS

From March 2002 to March 2005, 33 patients (33 knees) underwent primary TKA with a cementless tantalum monoblock tibial component. All patients were followed clinically and radiographically for a minimum of 10 years (mean 11.5 years, range 10-13 years). No patients were lost to follow-up. The underlying diagnosis that led to the primary TKA was primary osteoarthritis in 31 knees and post-traumatic osteoarthritis in 2 knees.

RESULTS

None of the components was revised. At a minimum 10-year follow-up, the survivorship with reoperation for any reason as end point was 96.9%. With tibial component revision for aseptic loosening or osteolysis as the end point survivorship was 100%. There was no radiographic evidence of tibial component loosening, subsidence, osteolysis, or migration at the time of the latest follow-up. The mean Knee Society knee scores improved from 56 points preoperatively to 93 points at the last clinical visit.

CONCLUSION

The porous tantalum tibial monoblock component demonstrated excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes with no component revisions for aseptic loosening at a minimum follow-up of 10 years.

Experimental and computational micromechanics at the tibial cement-trabeculae interface

Aseptic loosening of the tibial component in cemented total knee arthroplasty remains a major concern. We hypothesize that micromotion between the cement and trabeculae leads to increased circulation of interstitial fluid which in turn causes fluid-induced resorption of the trabeculae. Another mechanism for implant loosening is trabecular strain shielding. Using a newly developed experimental setup and digital image correlation (DIC) methods we were able to measure micromotion and strains in lab-prepared cement-trabeculae interface specimens (n=4). Finite element (FE) models of these specimens were developed to determine whether differences in micromotion and strain in morphologically varying specimens could be simulated accurately. Results showed that the measured micromotion and strains correlated well with FE model predictions (r(2)=0.59-0.85; r(2)=0.66-0.90). Global specimen strains measured axially matched well with the FE model strains (r(2)=0.87). FE model cement strains showed an increasing trend with distance from the cement border. The influence of loss of trabecular connectivity at the specimen edges was studied using our FE model results. Micromotion values at the outer edge of the specimens were higher than the specimen interior when considering a very thin outer edge (0.1mm). When the outer edge thickness was increased to about one trabecular length (0.8mm), there was a drop in the median and peak values. Using the experimental and modelling approach outlined in this study, we can further study the mechanisms that lead to loss of interlock between cement and trabeculae at the tibial interface.

Stem length in revision total knee arthroplasty

Stems are intramedullary extensions of either the femoral or tibial component of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designed to increase the mechanical stability to decrease the risk of aseptic loosening. Biomechanical studies have shown that TKA stems increase the mechanical stability by transferring load over a larger area and thereby reduce strain at the bone-component interface [1-4]. The length of a revision TKA stem is determined by the patient's anatomy and the intended fixation, namely fully cemented or press-fit cortical contact. The advantages and disadvantages of various stem lengths must be weighed against the needs of the patient to achieve an optimal outcome.

Bicruciate-retaining Total Knee Replacement Provides Satisfactory Function and Implant Survivorship at 23 Years

BACKGROUND

One of the goals of a TKA is to approximate the function of a normal knee. Preserving the natural ligaments might provide a method of restoring close to normal function. Sacrifice of the ACL is common and practical during a TKA. However, this ligament is functional in more than 60% of patients undergoing a TKA and kinematic studies support the concept of bicruciate-retaining (that is, ACL-preserving) TKA; however, relatively few studies have evaluated patients treated with bicruciate-retaining TKA implants.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

I asked: (1) what is the long-term (minimum 20-year) survivorship, (2) what are the functional results, and (3) what are the reasons for revision of bicruciate-retaining knee arthroplasty prostheses?

METHODS

From January 1989 to September 1992, I performed 639 total knee replacements in 537 patients. Of these, 489 were performed in 390 patients using a bicruciate-retaining, minimally constrained device. During the period in question, this knee prosthesis was used for all patients observed intraoperatively to have an intact, functional ACL with between 15° varus and 15° valgus joint deformity. There were 234 women and 156 men with a mean age at surgery of 65 years (range, 42-84 years) and a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis in 89%. The patella was resurfaced in all knees. The mean followup was 23 years (range, 20-24 years). At the time of this review, 199 (51%) patients had died and 31 (8%) patients were lost to followup, leaving 160 (41%) patients (214 knees) available for review. Component survivorship was determined by competing-risks analysis and Kaplan Meier survivorship analysis with revision for any reason as the primary endpoint. Patients were evaluated every 2 years to assess ROM, joint laxity, knee stability, and to determine American Knee Society scores.

RESULTS

The Kaplan-Meier survivorship was 89% (95% CI, 82%-93%) at 23 years with revision for any reason as the endpoint. Competing-risks survivorship was 94% (95% CI, 91%%-96 %) at 23 years. At followup, the mean age of the patients was 84 years (range, 63-101 years), the mean flexion was 117° (range, 90°-130°), the mean American Knee Society score improved from a preoperative mean of 42 (range, 26-49) to 91 (range, 61-100; p < .001). Twenty-two knees in 21 patients (5.6%) were revised, most commonly because of polyethylene wear.

CONCLUSIONS

ACL sacrifice may be an unnecessary concession during TKA. This study found satisfactory survivorship and function after more than 20 years of use for patients receiving a bicruciate-retaining TKA implant. A TKA that preserves cruciate ligaments provides a stable, well-functioning knee with a low likelihood of revision at long-term followup. Retaining both cruciate ligaments during knee arthroplasty is an attractive concept that is worth considering.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Clinical Outcomes of Tibial Components with Modular Stems Used in Primary TKA

Due to the known potential for fretting and corrosion at modular junctions in orthopaedic implants, this retrospective study evaluated radiographic and clinical outcomes of 85 primary TKA patients implanted with modular stemmed tibial components and followed up for an average of 82 months. There was low incidence of tibial radiolucent lines, excellent functional outcomes, and no complications associated with stem modularity. The findings were comparable to the historical control study involving 107 TKA with a nonmodular tibial stem design. When using surface cemented tibial components combined with a constrained polyethylene bearing, modular stems appear to be a viable option for primary TKA when adequate fixation and rotational stability are maintained.

Trabecular metal in total knee arthroplasty associated with higher knee scores: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Porous tantalum is an option of cementless fixation for TKA, but there is no randomized comparison with a cemented implant in a mid-term followup.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We asked whether a tibial component fixed by a porous tantalum system might achieve (1) better clinical outcome as reflected by the Knee Society Score (KSS) and WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index, (2) fewer complications and reoperations, and (3) improved radiographic results with respect to aseptic loosening compared with a conventional cemented implant.

METHODS

We randomized 145 patients into two groups, either a porous tantalum cementless tibial component group (Group 1) or cemented conventional tibial component in posterior cruciate retaining TKA group (Group 2). Patients were evaluated preoperatively and 15 days, 6 months, and 5 years after surgery, using the KSS and the WOMAC index. Complications, reoperations, and radiographic failures were tallied.

RESULTS

At 5-year followup the KSS mean was 90.4 (range, 68-100; 95% CI, ± 1.6) for Group 1, and 86.5 (range, 56-99; 95% CI, ± 2.4) for Group 2. The effect size, at 95% CI for the difference between means, was 3.88 ± 2.87. The WOMAC mean was 15.1 (range, 0-51; 95% CI, ± 2.6) for the Group 1, and 19.1 (range, 4-61; 95% CI, ± 2.9) for Group 2. The effect size for WOMAC was -4.0 ± 3.9. There were no differences in the frequency of complications or in aseptic loosening between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest there are small differences between the uncemented porous tantalum tibial component and the conventional cemented tibial component. It currently is undetermined whether the differences outweigh the cost of the implant and the results of their long-term performance.

Total knee replacement with retention of both cruciate ligaments

We report on the long-term results of 163 bicruciate-retaining Hermes 2C total knee replacements in 130 patients at a mean follow-up of 22.4 years (20.3 to 23.5). Even when the anterior cruciate ligament had a partially degenerative appearance it was preserved as long as the knee had a normal anterior drawer and Lachman’s test pre-operatively. The description and surgical technique of this minimally constrained prosthesis were published in 1983 and the ten-year clinical results in 1999.

A total of 12% of the knees (20 of 163) in this study were revised because of wear of the polyethylene tibial insert. Excellent stability was achieved and the incidence of aseptic component loosening was 4.3% (seven of 163). The survival rate using revision for any reason as the endpoint was 82% (95% confidence interval 76.2 to 88.0).

Although this series included a relatively small number of replacements, it demonstrated that the anterior cruciate ligament, even when partially degenerated at the time of TKR, remained functional and provided adequate stability at a long-term follow-up.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:917–22.

Aseptic tibial debonding as a cause of early failure in a modern total knee arthroplasty design

BACKGROUND

We observed isolated tibial component debonding from the cement in one modern primary TKA design (NexGen LPS 3° tibial tray; Zimmer, Warsaw, IN, USA). This failure mechanism is sparsely reported in the literature.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We (1) assessed survivorship of this tibial tray with special emphasis on debonding; (2) described clinical and radiographic features associated with tibial failure; and (3) compared patient and radiographic features of the failures with a matched cohort.

METHODS

A total of 1337 primary TKAs were performed with a cemented NexGen LPS 3° tibial tray over an 11-year period. Twenty-five knees (1.9%) were revised for tibial debonding. BMI and radiographic alignment in the tibial debonding group were compared with a matched control group. Implant survivorship was assessed using tibial debonding as the end point.

RESULTS

Survival free of revision from tibial debonding was 100% at 1 year and 97.8% at 5 years. The tibial failures shared a typical radiographic pattern with debonding at the cement-implant interface and subsidence into varus and flexion. We found no link between limb alignment or individual component alignment and failure because 22 of the 25 failures occurred in well-aligned knees.

CONCLUSIONS

Our standardized followup of patients undergoing TKA at routine intervals allowed us to discover a higher rate of revision resulting from tibial debonding. We have discontinued the use of this particular tibial tray for primary TKA and surveillance for patients undergoing TKA continues to be warranted.

Early migration of tibial components is associated with late revision: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 21,000 knee arthroplasties

PURPOSE

We performed two parallel systematic reviews and meta-analyses to determine the association between early migration of tibial components and late aseptic revision.

METHODS

One review comprised early migration data from radiostereometric analysis (RSA) studies, while the other focused on revision rates for aseptic loosening from long-term survival studies. Thresholds for acceptable and unacceptable migration were determined according to that of several national joint registries: < 5% revision at 10 years.

RESULTS

Following an elaborate literature search, 50 studies (involving 847 total knee prostheses (TKPs)) were included in the RSA review and 56 studies (20,599 TKPs) were included in the survival review. The results showed that for every mm increase in migration there was an 8% increase in revision rate, which remained after correction for age, sex, diagnosis, hospital type, continent, and study quality. Consequently, migration up to 0.5 mm was considered acceptable during the first postoperative year, while migration of 1.6 mm or more was unacceptable. TKPs with migration of between 0.5 and 1.6 mm were considered to be at risk of having revision rates higher than 5% at 10 years.

INTERPRETATION

There was a clinically relevant association between early migration of TKPs and late revision for loosening. The proposed migration thresholds can be implemented in a phased, evidence-based introduction of new types of knee prostheses, since they allow early detection of high-risk TKPs while exposing only a small number of patients.

Early aseptic loosening with a precoated low-profile tibial component: a case series

Between March 2007 and December 2008, we performed 529 consecutive total knee arthroplasties in 460 patients with the Zimmer (Warsaw, IN) NexGen MIS Tibial Component using a minimally invasive approach. Eight knees in 8 patients (1.5%) were revised for early aseptic loosening of the tibial component despite normal initial postoperative radiographs. Several additional patients have concerning radiographic signs of pending failure. The mean time to revision was 17 months (range, 9-31 months). Intraoperatively, in all cases, more than 50% of the tibial tray was devoid of cement and factory-applied polymethylmethacrylate. Our experience with early aseptic loosening of this tibial component has led us to discontinue its use until the etiology of the high early failure rate is able to be determined.

Mid-Term Results for Three Contemporary Total Knee Replacement Designs — A Comparative Study of 104 Patients with Primary Osteoarthritis

Aims:

The purpose of this study was to compare retrospectively the mid-term clinical and radiological results of three contemporary knee designs in cohorts operated on in the same hospital during the same time period.

Materials and Methods:

We evaluated mid-term clinical and radiographic outcome of three contemporary total knee designs (the AGC V2, the Duracon and the Nexgen) in 104 consecutive patients (129 knees) operate on for primary knee osteoarthritis at our hospital. The mean indexed age at the time of the operation was 69.2 years (range, 49.3 to 81.1 years). The mean follow-up time was 6.0 years (range, 0.2 to 7.9). All patients were followed for at least three years or until the first revision. In the survival analyses, the end point was defined as, revision for any reason.

Results:

The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a 98% (95% CI 94–100) survival rate for the NexGen, a 98% (95% CI 93–100) for the AGC and a 90% (95% CI 81–99) for the Duracon design at six years. Both the mean KSS for pain, KSS for function and the mean clinical knee score improved significantly in all three groups. There was no difference between the three designs in mid-term survivorship.

Conclusions:

Most of the revisions could be directly linked to perioperative surgical errors. In conclusion, the most recently introduced knee replacements of the present study (Duracon and Nexgen) did not show any clinically significant benefit over the older design (AGC) in the mid-term.

Cruciate-retaining TKA using a third-generation system with a four-pegged tibial component: a minimum 10-year followup note

BACKGROUND

A third-generation TKA system was designed to address problems encountered with earlier designs including a high rate of patellofemoral complications. At a minimum of 5 years, we previously reported survivorship of 98.7% using revision for any reason as the endpoint for a cohort that includes the patients described in this report. That cohort was unique in that a tibial component that uses four short pegs for fixation was used in a subset of patients undergoing cruciate-retaining TKA and the tibial and femoral components were precoated with polymethylmethacrylate.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We now report the survival rate, postoperative function, complications, radiographic loosening, and osteolysis at a minimum of 10 years postoperatively.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 161 patients who underwent 179 TKAs. The patella was resurfaced in all cases and all components were cemented. Patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically for evidence of component loosening and osteolysis. Forty of the 161 patients (with 44 TKAs) had died and eight patients (nine knees) were lost to followup. For the remaining 113 patients (126 knees), the minimum followup was 10 years (mean, 11.7 years; range, 10.0-13.9 years).

RESULTS

Survivorship at a minimum of 10 years postoperatively using revision for any reason and revision for aseptic loosening were 97.7% and 100%, respectively. Three knees were revised: one for infection, one for periprosthetic fracture, and one for postoperative arthrofibrosis. There were no reoperations for patellar component maltracking, wear or loosening, tibiofemoral polyethylene wear, osteolysis, or aseptic loosening. Hospital for Special Surgery scores improved from a mean of 47.7 (range, 23-78) preoperatively to 85.4 (range, 33-100).

CONCLUSIONS

This cruciate-retaining design had a low risk of implant failure or revision and the design changes eliminated the patellar failures seen with earlier iterations at up to 10 years.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Contemporary cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty with a pegged tibial baseplate. Results at a minimum of ten years

BACKGROUND

A total knee arthroplasty with a four-peg tibial baseplate is an uncommonly used contemporary design. Potential advantages of this baseplate include preservation of host bone, compatibility with minimally invasive techniques, and easier removal with revision techniques. The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term results of a contemporary total knee arthroplasty that included a four-peg tibial baseplate.

METHODS

From February 1995 to December 1996, 127 total knee arthroplasties were performed by one surgeon in 115 patients with an average age of seventy years. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed with use of the Knee Society scoring system at a minimum of ten years following replacement. Complications were identified by means of chart review and screening for readmission at surrounding institutions.

RESULTS

At the time of follow-up, at a minimum of ten years after the arthroplasty, thirty patients (with thirty-three involved knees) were documented to have died and four patients (with seven involved knees) could not be located. The next-of-kin of the patients who had died directly confirmed that the knee was unrevised at the time of death. Eighty-seven knees in eighty-one patients remained available for evaluation after a minimum of ten years of follow-up. Two knees had failed: one had a late infection at three years, and one had aseptic loosening at seven years. The rate of survival free of revision at ten years was 97%. Knee Society knee and function scores averaged 94 and 75 points, respectively. None of the remaining knees had radiographic evidence of loosening.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated excellent, durable clinical and radiographic results at a minimum of ten years after replacement with this cemented, modular, fixed-bearing, cruciate-retaining total knee prosthesis with a four-peg tibial baseplate. We believe that this design is an acceptable option for total knee arthroplasty.

A trabecular metal tibial component in total knee replacement in patients younger than 60 years: a two-year radiostereophotogrammetric analysis

We compared the performance of uncemented trabecular metal tibial components in total knee replacement with that of cemented tibial components in patients younger than 60 years over two years using radiostereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA). A total of 22 consecutive patients (mean age 53 years, 33 to 59, 26 knees) received an uncemented NexGen trabecular metal cruciate-retaining monobloc tibial component and 19 (mean 53 years, 44 to 59, 21 knees) a cemented NexGen Option cruciate-retaining modular tibial component. All the trabecular metal components migrated during the initial three months and then stabilised. The exception was external rotation, which did not stabilise until 12 months. Unlike conventional metal-backed implants which displayed a tilting migration comprising subsidence and lift-off from the tibial tray, most of the trabecular metal components showed subsidence only, probably due to the elasticity of the implant. This pattern of subsidence is regarded as being beneficial for uncemented fixation.