The combined anteversion technique for acetabular component anteversion

Intraoperative estimation of natural femoral anteversion from proximal femoral osseous orientation during total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to elucidate the relationship between the orientation of the osseous structure of the proximal femur encountered during total hip arthroplasty (THA) and preoperative femoral anteversion (FA).

METHODS

Three-dimensional models were constructed using full-length lower extremity computed tomography images from a total of 80 participants. Femoral neck cutting was performed at heights of 5, 10, and 15 mm relative to the lesser trochanter. Following neck cutting, the angles formed by the anterior outer cortex and posterior outer cortex with the posterior condylar line (PCL) were defined as the anterior cortical angle (ACA) and posterior cortical angle (PCA), respectively. Univariate linear regression analysis was conducted using the remaining measurements with FA as the dependent variable.

RESULTS

The mean age of the participants was 60.98 ± 10.82 years (males, 60.50 ± 11.36 years; females, 61.45 ± 10.37 years) (p = 0.697). All cortical angles and FA were larger in women compared to those in men. When comparing measurements by age groups, no statistically significant differences were observed. Univariate linear regression analysis with FA as the dependent variable showed statistical significance for all cortical angles. The adjusted R2 values were 0.711 (ACA5), 0.677 (ACA10), 0.572 (ACA15), 0.493 (PCA5), 0.574 (PCA10), and 0.446 (PCA15).

CONCLUSION

Natural FA can be inferred from the anterior cortical angle (ACA) from femoral neck cutting plane observed during the THA procedure without preoperative images.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Retrospectively registered.

Accuracy and safety of a new robotic arm for both femoral and acetabular side in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaveric study

BACKGROUND

To investigate the accuracy and safety of a newly constructed robotic arm which can cover the whole process of THA, we performed a series of robot-assisted total hip replacement on the cadaver.

METHODS

Fifteen frozen cadaveric specimens (30 hips) were used for this study. In this investigation, united hip system and Longwell robotic-assisted system were used. The entire lower limb was CT scanned prior to surgery. The 3D model was produced based on CT data; the site of the prosthesis, including acetabular anteversion, inclination angle, and the position of femoral prosthesis, was planned. With the assistance of a robotic arm, the surgeon changed the parameters based on the preoperative plan and the actual condition during surgery, and completed the whole procedure. Following surgery, we measured the acetabular anteversion angle, acetabular inclination angle, femur anteversion angle, combined anteversion angle, stem angulation, and canal fill ratio.

RESULTS

The parameters proved that the acetabular anteversion angle was 16.85 ± 3.00°, the acetabular inclination angle was 40.38 ± 5.37°, femur anteversion angle was 15.90 ± 9.01°, combined anteversion angle was 32.75 ± 9.03°, stem angulation was 1.84 ± 0.99°, and leg length discrepancy was 2.47 ± 1.43 mm. The canal fill ratio (CFR) of femoral prosthesis of osteotomy line in sagittal section is 99.72 ± 1.54% and in coronal section is 62.94 ± 8.91%; below osteotomy line 2.5 cm in sagittal section is 100.00% and in coronal section is 81.48 ± 12.94%; below osteotomy line 7.5 cm in sagittal section is 59.51 ± 12.94% and in coronal section is 89.79 ± 11.13%; femoral shaft isthmus in sagittal section is 56.41 ± 13.80% and in coronal section is 84.95 ± 15.17%.

CONCLUSION

The accuracy and safety of this novel robotic arm are suitable for preparing both the acetabular and femoral sides, providing evidence for clinical trial.

Combined Anteversion Technique for Total Hip Arthroplasty With Handheld Accelerometer-Based Navigation System

Aiming for a combined cup and stem anteversion within a target range is one way to assess appropriate prosthetic component orientation and restoration of functional range of motion. We describe a surgical technique that allows the surgeon to assess the combined anteversion using a handheld accelerometer-based navigation system for total hip arthroplasty through a posterior approach. The femur is prepared first, at which time the femoral version is estimated by the surgeon. The acetabular component is then positioned using the navigation system to estimate anteversion, with the goal of providing a combined version of 37° ± 7°. The described technique allows surgeons to achieve the desired intraoperative combined anteversion.

Level of evidence

IV (technical note).

Acetabular, Femoral, and Combined Anteversion in a Province in South Korea: Computed Tomography-Based Study

Background

The purpose of this study was to investigate the femoral, acetabular, and combined anteversion of the hip joint in South Koreans using computed tomography (CT).

Methods

We measured anteversion using CT venograms taken from 2016 to 2020. Of the total 1,073 patients, 952 patients were included in the study except for those with pelvic fractures, previous femoral fractures, childhood hip joint disease, osteoarthritis, or hip dysplasia (lateral center-edge angle, < 20), foreigners, and hip and knee replacement patients. Measurements were taken twice by two orthopedic surgeons.

Results

The femoral anteversion in women was 10.64° ± 10.26° (≤ 49 years), 15.75° ± 9.40° (50-59 years), 10.81° ± 9.14° (60-69 years), 12.38° ± 8.55° (70-79 years), and 11.23° ± 8.44° (≥ 80 years). The femoral anteversion in men was 12.02° ± 11.38° (≤ 49 years), 10.62° ± 9.11° (50-59 years), 6.09° ± 9.95° (60-69 years), 6.57° ± 9.51° (70-79 years), and 5.53° ± 9.29° (≥ 80 years). The acetabular anteversion in women was 17.65° ± 6.58° (≤ 49 years), 19.24° ± 6.42° (50-59 years), 20.30° ± 6.25° (60-69 years), 22.38° ± 7.36° (70-79 years), and 23.34° ± 6.98° (≥ 80 years). The acetabular anteversion in men was 15.21° ± 8.14° (≤ 49 years), 17.68° ± 6.00° (50-59 years), 17.54° ± 5.93° (60-69 years), 18.68° ± 6.62° (70-79 years), and 18.19° ± 6.94° (≥ 80 years). The combined anteversion in women was 28.29° ± 14.30° (≤ 49 years), 34.99° ± 10.62° (50-59 years), 31.11° ± 11.52° (60-69 years), 34.76° ± 10.86° (70-79 years), and 34.57° ± 11.45° (≥ 80 years). The combined anteversion in men was 27.23° ± 15.11° (≤ 49 years), 28.30° ± 11.23° (50-59 years), 23.63° ± 11.77° (60-69 years), 25.25° ± 12.02° (70-79 years), and 23.72° ± 11.88° (≥ 80 years).

Conclusions

Femoral anteversion tended to decrease with age in men and acetabular anteversion tended to increase in both men and women. Combined anteversion showed a tendency to increase slightly in women.

A comparison of accuracy and safety between stem-first and cup-first total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The combined anteversion theory to prevent impingement in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been proposed. However, because stem-anteversion is influenced by the native femoral anteversion and the stem flexion/extension angle, it is often difficult to adjust stem anteversion during surgery. Therefore, the stem-first (combined anteversion) technique may be useful to adjust and achieve appropriate cup anteversion during surgery with respect to the implanted stem anteversion angle. However, the technique may adversely affect cup or stem angle accuracy and result in intra-operative bleeding, post-operative adverse events, and prolonged operative time. It is inconclusive whether either the stem-first or cup-first technique is safe or accurate. Therefore, this study assessed the accuracy and safety of stem-first THA compared to those of cup-first THA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective randomised controlled trial analysed 114 patients who were randomly divided into 2 groups (stem-first group: n = 57, cup-first group (control group): n = 57). Primary outcomes included cup and stem angle, the discrepancies from the targeted angle and combined anteversion (evaluated via CT at 3 months postoperatively). Secondary outcomes included intraoperative blood loss, operative time, WOMAC, and adverse events.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in age, gender, BMI or in the primary and secondary outcomes between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Performing stem-first in THA did not adversely affect cup and stem angle accuracy, or result in intraoperative bleeding, prolongation of operative time, or postoperative adverse events. Thus, performing stem-first may be advantageous for achieving combined anteversion theory.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) registration number UMIN000025189.

Identification of risk factors for treatment failure of closed reduction and abduction bracing after first-time total hip arthroplasty dislocation

INTRODUCTION

After a first-time total hip arthroplasty (THA) dislocation, a closed reduction followed by partial immobilization in an abduction brace is the recommended therapy. Despite modern abduction braces the success rate of conservative therapy is limited and evidence is scarce. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for failure of conservative treatment after THA dislocation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eighty-seven patients, with conservative treatment of a first-time dislocation of a primary or revision THA, were included in this retrospective cohort study. Success was defined as a stable THA for a minimum of 6 months. Re-dislocation, open reduction or revision was defined as failure. The following risk factors were analyzed: gender, age, body mass index (BMI), ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score, time of dislocation, head size, cup orientation, leg length, center of rotation and offset.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven percent of all patients experienced a re-dislocation, despite standardized conservative therapy. A BMI ≥ 25 kg/m², early THA dislocation, and low cup anteversion were associated with a statistically significantly higher risk for re-dislocation. None of the other risk-factors achieved statistical significance. A multifactorial risk-factor analysis was performed to assess whether a cup position outside of Lewinnek's safe zone in combination with gender, BMI and time to dislocation showed statistical significance for re-dislocation. Both BMI ≥ 25 kg/m² and early dislocation showed a statistically higher failure rate. Cup position and gender were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

BMI ≥ 25 kg/m², early THA dislocation and low cup anteversion were identified as significant risk factors for failure of conservative treatment with an abduction brace for first-time THA dislocation.

The impact of functional combined anteversion on hip range of motion: a new optimal zone to reduce risk of impingement in total hip arthroplasty

AIMS

Pelvic tilt (PT) can significantly change the functional orientation of the acetabular component and may differ markedly between patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). Patients with stiff spines who have little change in PT are considered at high risk for instability following THA. Femoral component position also contributes to the limits of impingement-free range of motion (ROM), but has been less studied. Little is known about the impact of combined anteversion on risk of impingement with changing pelvic position.

METHODS

We used a virtual hip ROM (vROM) tool to investigate whether there is an ideal functional combined anteversion for reduced risk of hip impingement. We collected PT information from functional lateral radiographs (standing and sitting) and a supine CT scan, which was then input into the vROM tool. We developed a novel vROM scoring system, considering both seated flexion and standing extension manoeuvres, to quantify whether hips had limited ROM and then correlated the vROM score to component position.

RESULTS

The vast majority of THA planned with standing combined anteversion between 30° to 50° and sitting combined anteversion between 45° to 65° had a vROM score > 99%, while the majority of vROM scores less than 99% were outside of this zone. The range of PT in supine, standing, and sitting positions varied widely between patients. Patients who had little change in PT from standing to sitting positions had decreased hip vROM.

CONCLUSION

It has been shown previously that an individual's unique spinopelvic alignment influences functional cup anteversion. But functional combined anteversion, which also considers stem position, should be used to identify an ideal THA position for impingement-free ROM. We found a functional combined anteversion zone for THA that may be used moving forward to place total hip components. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(10):834-841.

Two year follow up of supercapsular percutaneously assisted total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) has an incidence of 2-3%. Approximately 77% of dislocations occur within the first year after surgery. The SuperPATH technique is a minimally invasive approach for THA that preserves soft tissue attachments. The purpose of this study is to describe the dislocation rate at 1 year after SuperPATH primary THA.

METHODS

All elective primary THAs performed by the senior author using the SuperPATH approach. Exclusion criteria were acute femoral neck fracture, revision surgery, or malignancy. There were 214 of 279 eligible patients available for telephone interviews (76.7%). Medical records were reviewed for secondary outcomes including early and late complications, cup positioning, distance ambulated on postoperative day one, discharge destination, and blood transfusions.

RESULTS

Mean age at surgery was 64 ± 10.8 years and mean time to telephone follow up was 773 ± 269.7 days. There were 104 female and 110 male patients. There were zero dislocations reported. Blood transfusions were performed in 3.7% of patients, and 75.7% were discharged to home at an average of 2.3 ± 1.0 days. Cup position averaged 43.6 ± 5.2° abduction and 20.9 ± 6.2° anteversion, with an average leg length discrepancy of 3.6 ± 3.32 mm. Complications included three intraoperative calcar fractures, one periprosthetic femur fracture, one early femoral revision, three superficial infections, and one instance of wound necrosis.

CONCLUSION

SuperPATH approach is safe for use in primary THA resulting in a low dislocation rate.

Choice of surgical approach influences the combined anteversion needed for a stable and impingement-free total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Accurate component positioning is the key for successful outcome after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Positioning acetabular and femoral components in a safe zone of 25°-50° on the basis of combined anteversion (CA) has shown to reduce instability and impingement. This safe zone was described for THAs performed through the posterior approach and has not been validated for other surgical approaches.

METHODS

Seventy patients who underwent unilateral uncemented THA were included in the study; 35 patients-using posterior approach and the remaining 35-using trans-gluteal approach. All patients included had a stable and impingement-free THA at a mean follow-up of 39.2 ± 9.5 months. CT scan was performed to assess component positioning by calculating CA. The values were compared between the two groups to study possible differences.

RESULTS

CA in the trans-gluteal group was significantly lower (32° ± 3.7° vs 38.4° ± 4.6°, P < .001) compared to posterior group. The difference in CA was due to the differences in acetabular anteversion, which was significantly low in the trans-gluteal group than the posterior group (22.1° ± 3.6° vs 27.8° ± 4.2°, P < .001). The mean femoral anteversion was similar in both groups. All trans-gluteal hips fell within the safe zone of 20°-40°, and all posterior hips fell within the safe zone of 25°-50°.

CONCLUSION

A safe zone of 25°-50° is valid for THAs performed from the posterior approach but not universally applicable. For trans-gluteal approach, a safe zone of 20°-40° is better to provide a stable and impingement-free THA. CA varies with the surgical approach. THAs performed through the trans-gluteal approach can be stable and impingement-free with lesser CA compared to THAs performed through the posterior approach.

Achievement of optimal implant alignment using taper wedge stems with cup-first THA through the MIS antero-lateral approach

PURPOSE

Combined anteversion (CA) technique (stem-first procedure) has become generally accepted as an ideal means to achieve optimal CA value in THA. However, we hypothesized that CA technique for patients with various native femoral anteversions could pose a risk of anterior or posterior cup protrusion. In the present study, we examined whether it is possible to use the taper wedge stem to change the stem version to achieve optimal CA while avoiding cup protrusions with the cup-first procedure through minimally invasive (MIS) antero-lateral approach.

METHODS

Eighty-one patients underwent cup-first THA with a taper wedge stem. The acetabular cup was placed following the preoperative planning of the cup alignment to avoid anterior cup protrusions using CT-based navigation. Following the CA theory, anteversion of the taper wedge stem was changed to the target anteversion from the patient's native femoral anteversion. The native femoral anteversion, the change in version angle of the stem, postoperative CA and the length of anterior cup protrusions were evaluated in postoperative CT measurements.

RESULTS

The native femoral anteversion averaged 25.7° ± 8.9° (range 8°-45°). Cases with increased and decreased stem anteversion were observed in 42 hips (51.8%) and 33 hips (40.7%), respectively. The amount of increased and decreased version angles averaged 7.7° ± 4.8° (range 2°-21°) and 7.8° ± 5.1° (range 2°-20°), respectively. Postoperative CA values averaged 36.7° ± 3.4° (range 29.4°-44.2°) and anterior cup protrusion length averaged 2.0 mm ± 2.6 mm (0 ~ 8.8 mm) in axial view and 0.4 mm ± 1.0 mm (0 ~ 3.6 mm) in sagittal view. Anterior cup protrusion of more than 10 mm was not observed in any hips.

CONCLUSION

This procedure can be considered as an option to achieve optimal CA anteversion while avoiding anterior cup protrusion in THA.

New combined anteversion technique in hybrid THA: cup-first procedure with CT-based navigation

PURPOSE

Combined anteversion (CA) technique (stem-first procedure) is generally accepted as the optimal technique to attain an appropriate CA value in total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, cup anteversion is strongly influenced by the native femoral anteversion. Accordingly, anterior protrusion of the cup in the acetabulum might occur. The purpose of the present study is to investigate the achievement of the optimal CA while avoiding anterior cup protrusion and examine the significance of our new CA technique with cup-first procedure in hybrid THA.

METHODS

Seventy-nine hybrid THAs with the cup-first procedure used a CT-based navigation system for cup positioning. In the preoperative planning, cup anteversion was aimed at approximately 20°. However, in actuality, sufficient cup coverage in the original acetabulum based on individual anatomy is given priority over cup placement based on CT-based planning to ensure adequate cup coverage. The target stem anteversion was determined following Widmer's mathematical formula (37.3 = femoral stem anteversion × 0.7 + cup anteversion). Cemented stem was inserted according to the target stem anteversion angle.

RESULTS

Regarding the assessment of overall alignment, the calculated Widmer's CA values during surgery and postoperative CT evaluation were 34.1° ± 6.0° (range 20.7°-51.2°) and 35.1° ± 6.7° (range 21.6°-50.7°). There were 72 hips (91.1%) within 25°-50° of CA. Cup protrusion length averaged 2.0 mm ± 2.6 mm (0-8.8 mm) in the axial view and 0.4 mm ± 1.0 mm (0-3.6 mm) in the sagittal view. Cup protrusion length of more than 5 mm was indicated in 10 hips, and no hips observed more than 10 mm.

CONCLUSION

Our new CA technique (cup-first procedure) with hybrid THA was able to achieve optimal CA value while avoiding anterior cup protrusion.

Simplifying the Hip-Spine Relationship for Total Hip Arthroplasty: What Do I Need to Do Differently Intraoperatively?

As our recognition of the complexity of the hip-spine relationship is based on stability, there are several intraoperative strategies that surgeons may consider. First, patient positioning on the operative table plays an important role in reducing pelvic motion and tilt. Then, consider determining the femoral version before acetabular preparation and component insertion. The concept of a combined version of both components is an excellent guide to position. However, femoral version is often dictated by native femoral torsion, and therefore, it is the acetabular version that must be adjusted accordingly. Finally, based upon preoperative planning and intraoperative verification, the use of enabling technologies such as navigation, robotics, and other smart tools appears to play a major role of ever increasing importance in accurate component placement.

A Geometric Model to Determine Patient-Specific Cup Anteversion Based on Pelvic Motion in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Introduction

Cup position is critical to stability in total hip arthroplasty and is affected by pelvis motion during positions of daily life. The purpose of this study was to explicitly define the relationship between sagittal pelvic motion and resultant cup functional anteversion and create a tool to guide the surgeon to a patient-specific intra-operative anteversion.

Materials and Methods

10,560 combinations of inclination, anteversion, and pelvic tilt were generated using a geometric model. Resultant functional anteversion was calculated for each iteration and variables were correlated. An electronic mobile tool was created that compares inputted patient-specific values to population-based averages to determine pelvic positions and dynamics that may lead to instability.

Results

A third-degree polynomial equation was used to describe the relationship between variables. The freely downloadable mobile tool uses input from pre-operative plain radiographic measurements to provide the surgeon a quantitative correction to intra-operative cup anteversion based on differences in functional anteversion compared to population-based averages.

Conclusion

This study provides a geometric relationship between planned cup position, pelvic position and motion, and the resultant functional anteversion. This mathematical model was applied to an electronic tool that seeks to determine an individualized intra-operative cup anteversion based on measured patient-specific pelvic dynamics.

Can some early revision total hip arthroplasties be avoided?

Aims

Studying the indications for revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) may enable surgeons to change their practice during the initial procedure, thereby reducing the need for revision surgery. The aim of this study was to identify and describe the potentially avoidable indications for revision THA within five years of the initial procedure.

Patients and Methods

A retrospective review of 117 patients (73 women, 44 men; mean age 61.5 years (27 to 88)) who met the inclusion criteria was conducted. Three adult reconstruction surgeons independently reviewed the radiographs and medical records, and they classified the revision THAs into two categories: potentially avoidable and unavoidable. Baseline demographics, perioperative details, and quality outcomes up to the last follow-up were recorded.

Results

A total of 60 revision THAs (51.3%) were deemed potentially avoidable and 57 (48.7%) were deemed unavoidable. The following were identified as avoidable factors: suboptimal positioning of the acetabular component (29; 48%), intraoperative fracture or a fracture missed on an intraoperative radiograph (20; 33%), early (less than two weeks) aseptic loosening (seven; 11.7%), and symptomatic leg length discrepancy of > 1 cm (four; 6.7%).

Conclusion

A surprisingly large proportion of acute revision THAs are potentially avoidable. Surgeons must carefully evaluate the indications for revision THAs in their practice and identify new methods to address these issues. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B(6 Supple B):97–103.

Total hip arthroplasty using stem-first technique with navigation: the potential of achievement of the optimal combined anteversion being a risk factor for anterior cup protrusion

PURPOSE

In the combined anteversion (CA) technique for total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a cementless stem, cup anteversion is strongly influenced by the native femoral anteversion. It is hypothesized that in cases with large native femoral anteversion, cup anteversion can be decreased, and anterior cup protrusion from the anterior edge of the acetabulum could occur due to the achievement of optimal CA. In this study, the accuracy of CA in THA with the CA technique using imageless navigation and the relationship between the protrusion of the anterior edge of cup and optimum CA was retrospectively evaluated.

METHODS

Ninety-seven patients (104 hips) who underwent primary THA by the CA technique using image-free navigation were enrolled in the study. The femoral stem was placed following the individual femoral anteversion so that the target cup anteversion could be determined following a mathematical formula (37 = femoral stem anteversion × 0.7 + cup anteversion). Results The resulting CA values effectively achieved accurate CA with 39.49 ± 5.03° postoperatively. On the other hand, anterior cup protrusion was measured by computed tomography image. A cup protrusion length of more than 3 mm was indicated for 60 cases (57.7%). All included patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 as protrusion positive and Group 2 as protrusion negative. In Group 1, preoperative femoral anteversion and postoperative stem anteversion were significantly higher, while postoperative cup anteversion was significantly lower. However, the postoperative CA value indicated no significant difference between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The CA (stem-first) technique with image-free navigated THA could effectively achieve accurate CA. On the other hand, a large number of cases revealed anterior cup protrusion due to the low cup anteversion.

Robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty: Clinical outcomes and complication rate

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to report minimum 2-year outcomes and complications for robotic-arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed between June 2011 and April 2014. Inclusion criteria were primary robotic-arm-assisted THAs treating idiopathic osteoarthritis with ≥ 2-year follow-up. Demographics, operating time, complications, 2-year outcome scores and satisfaction, and subsequent surgeries were recorded.

RESULTS

There were 181 cases eligible for inclusion, of which 162 (89.5%) had minimum 2-year follow-up. At the latest follow-up, the mean visual analogue scale was 0.7, satisfaction was 9.3, Harris hip score was 91.1 and forgotten joint score was 83.1. Six (3.7%) intraoperative complications and six (3.7%) postoperative complications were reported. No leg length discrepancies (LLDs) or dislocations were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic-arm-assisted THA demonstrates favourable short-term outcomes and does not result in a higher complication rate compared to non-robotic THA as reported by the literature.

Additive Influence of Hip Offset and Leg Length Reconstruction on Postoperative Improvement in Clinical Outcome After Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of prospective studies investigating the additive effect of both acetabular and femoral reconstruction parameters on the functional outcome following total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

The aim of this prospective cohort study was to determine the combined influence of hip geometry reconstruction and component positioning on the clinical outcome following primary THA for unilateral osteoarthritis. We prospectively assessed the clinical outcome and radiographic parameters for hip geometry reconstruction, component position, and orientation using validated measurements for the operated hip compared to the contralateral native hip in a consecutive series of 113 patients with primary unilateral cementless THA. The correlation of reconstruction parameters was investigated using a multivariate polynomial regression model for the dependent variable ΔHHS (difference between the Harris hip scores preoperatively and 2.0-4.8 years postoperatively). Target zones for hip reconstruction and component positioning were investigated for an association with superior clinical outcome.

RESULTS

The regression model demonstrated a significant correlation for the ΔHHS and both hip offset (HO) reconstruction and leg length difference. Patients with accurate to slightly increased HO reconstruction combined with balanced leg length demonstrated a significantly higher ΔHHS than patients outside this zone (HO: 5 ± 5 and LLD: 0 ±5 mm, P = .029). This finding could be confirmed for 2 enlarged zones (zone 1: HO, 7.5 ± 7.5 and LLD, 2.5 ± 7.5 mm, P = .028; zone 2: HO, 7.5 ± 7.5 and LLD, 7.5 ± 7.5 mm, P = .007).

CONCLUSION

HO and leg length reconstruction demonstrated an additive effect on clinical outcome and surgeons should aim for high accuracy in the reconstruction of both factors.

Cementless Hip Stem Anteversion in the Dysplastic Hip: A Comparison of Tapered Wedge vs Metaphyseal Filling

BACKGROUND

Appropriate stem anteversion is important for achieving stability of the prosthetic joint in total hip arthroplasty. Anteversion of a cementless femoral stem is affected by the femoral canal morphology and varies according to stem geometry. We investigated the difference and variation of the increase in anteversion between 2 types of cementless stems, and the correlation between each stem and the preoperative femoral anteversion.

METHODS

We retrospectively compared 2 groups of hips that underwent total hip arthroplasty using a metaphyseal filling stem (78 hips) or a tapered wedge stem (83 hips). All the patients had osteoarthritis due to hip dysplasia. Computed tomography was used to measure preoperative femoral anteversion at 5 levels and postoperative stem anteversion.

RESULTS

The increase in anteversion of the tapered wedge stem group (22.7° ± 11.6°) was more than that of the metaphyseal filling stem group (17.2° ± 8.3°; P = .0007). The variation of the increase in the tapered wedge stem group was significantly larger than that in the metaphyseal filling stem group (P = .0016). The metaphyseal filling stem group was more highly and positively correlated with femoral anteversion than the tapered wedge stem group.

CONCLUSION

Femoral anteversion affects stem anteversion differently according to stem geometry. The tapered wedge stems had greater variation of the increase in anteversion than did the metaphyseal filling stems. Based on the results of this study, it is difficult to preoperatively estimate the increase in stem anteversion for tapered wedge stems.

Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Imageless Navigation With the Concept of Combined Anteversion

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the implant positions and clinical results of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) using an imageless navigation with the concept of combined anteversion.

METHODS

A total of 40 cementless revision THAs (24 men and 16 women) using an imageless navigation with the concept of combined anteversion were retrospectively evaluated. The concept of combined anteversion was applied in cup positioning based on Widmer's equation (cup anteversion + 0.7 × stem anteversion). The mean follow-up period was 80.7 months. Postoperatively, the inclination of the cup was evaluated on standard anteroposterior view of the radiograph, and the anteversion of the cup and femoral stem was evaluated using computed tomography scan. A cup inclination of 40° ± 10° and combined anteversion of the cup and femoral stem of 37° ± 10° based on Widmer's equation were regarded as the "safe zone."

RESULTS

The average anteversion of the revised femoral stems was 15.3° ± 2.9° (range, 9.5°-21.5°), whereas that of the remained femoral stems was 17.4° ± 9.7° (range, 4.2°-29.8°). The inclination, anteversion of the cup, and combined anteversion after revision THA were 42.3° ± 3.1° (range, 32.1°-48.2°), 25.0° ± 2.9° (range, 16.9°-29.5°), and 36.1° ± 3.4° (range, 27.2°-42.9°), respectively. Therefore, the position of the implants, relative to the safe zone, showed no outliers after the revision surgery. Neither dislocation nor osteolysis was observed after the surgery.

CONCLUSION

Favorable results of this study indicate that imageless navigation helps the surgeon in placing the components of revision THA in the safe zone. This study also shows that when this safe zone is consistently obtained, then no postoperative dislocations were observed in these patients over the 6-year follow-up period.

Inter-Rater and Intra-Rater Repeatability and Reliability of EOS 3-Dimensional Imaging Analysis Software

BACKGROUND

Quantifying ideal component position for the acetabulum and stem during total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been described by many methods. A new imaging method using low-dose digital stereoradiography, the EOS imaging system, is a biplanar low-dose X-ray system that allows for 3-dimensional modeling of lower limbs and semiautomated measurement of pelvic parameters and implant alignment.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients who underwent primary THA by a single surgeon between October 2014 and December 2014 were retrospectively selected. Only patients with unilateral THA without associated spine pathologies were included, totaling 16 right hips and 9 left hips. There were 8 men and 17 women in the cohort, with a mean age of 67 years (range, 53-82). Three individuals performed measurements of pelvic parameters and implant alignment on 3 separate occasions. An interclass correlation of >0.75 was accepted as evidence of excellent agreement and a confirmation of measurement reliability.

RESULTS

Before reviewing patient radiographs, 4 pelvic phantom models were analyzed using the EOS 3-dimensional software to verify accuracy. All anatomic and implant measurements performed by the 3 independent reviewers showed interobserver and intraobserver agreement with interclass correlation >0.75.

CONCLUSION

Three-dimensional modeling of hip implants with the EOS imaging system is a reasonable option for the evaluation of component position after THA.

Validating a Modified Circle Theorem Method for the Measurement of Acetabular Cup Anteversion on Plain Radiography with Intra-Operative Data from Robotic Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty

This study aims to validate a modified circle theorem method for the calculation of true version of the acetabular component on anteroposterior x-rays with intra-operative version data derived from robotic assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA). Planar anteversion measurements recorded intraoperatively in 80 THAs were correlated to measurements on anteroposterior radiographs. The mean anteversion of the cohort measured by the robotic system and on plain radiography was 21.2° ± 2.0° and 19.9° ± 3.4° respectively and 97.5% of cases were in a 30% relative error. The correlation between the true and planar measurements of anteversion on plain radiographs was strong (Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.9422). We conclude that the circle theorem method can be validated with data from robotic guided THA.

Range of Hip Joint Motion in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Patients Following Total Hip Arthroplasty With the Surgical Technique Using the Concept of Combined Anteversion: A Study of Crowe I and II Patients

The combined anteversion surgical technique has been proposed and used in clinical practice. To more objectively evaluate the feasibility of this surgical technique using combined anteversion concept for DDH patients, we studied 34 DDH patients (40 hips) in this research. Every patient underwent pelvic CT scans before and after surgery and the HHSs were recorded. Optimal range of joint motion was measured using a three-dimensional reconstruction technique and a dynamic measurement technique. The results revealed that joint function met the requirements of daily life and the range of motion was not over-limited by impingement between the prosthesis and the skeleton. Moreover, the combined anteversion was found to be the most critical parameter in this study.

Patient-Specific Guides for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Paired Acetabular and Femoral Implantation Approach

While total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a common orthopedic procedure for treatment of hip arthritis, current techniques demonstrate poor implant alignment accuracy and precision, which is critical to the replacement's long-term survivorship. Patient-specific instruments to guide bone preparation and implantation could improve accuracy, thereby improving replacement survivorship. A single cadaver was CT (computer tomography) scanned to extract the 3D bone geometry, from which the operating surgeon planned a THA. Patient-specific guides were designed, 3D printed, and used in the cadaveric THA procedure. Postprocedural CT data were used to compare measured implant positioning versus the preprocedural template. Implanted component accuracy ranged from 1 deg–12 deg.

Reliability of a new method for evaluating femoral stem positioning after total hip arthroplasty based on stereoradiographic 3D reconstruction

The goal of this study was to validate a new method for determining femoral stem positioning based on 3D models derived from the EOS biplanar system. Independents observers measured stem anteversion and femoral offset using CT scan and EOS system of 28 femoral stems implanted in composite femurs. In parallel, the same parameters were measured on biplanar lower limb radiographs acquired from 30 patients who had undergone total hip arthroplasty. CT scanner and biplanar X-ray measurements on composite femurs were highly correlated: 0.94 for femoral offset (P < 0.01), 0.98 for stem anteversion (P < 0.01). The inter and intra-observer reproducibility when measuring composite bones was excellent with both imaging modalities as when measuring femoral stem positioning in patients with the biplanar X-ray system.

A new method of registration in navigated hip arthroplasty without the need to register the anterior pelvic plane

A prospective clinical study of 50 patients was conducted to validate a new method of imageless computer navigated hip arthroplasty. The new method enables the surgeon to acquire all registration points with the patient positioned and draped in lateral decubitus position. The final component orientation was measured from post-operative CT scans. The mean error in component position was -1.1° (SD 3.1°) for inclination and 0.9° (SD 4.3°) for anteversion. This compared favourably with the error of -1.8° (SD 1.8°) for inclination and -4.8° (SD 2.7°) for anteversion when using the traditional APP registration. Results show that one can expect the acetabular component to be within a safe zone of ±10° in 99.8% for inclination and 97.7% for anteversion when using the new lateral registration method. Level of Evidence Level II, Prognostic study.

Modular necks in primary hip arthroplasty without anatomical deformity: no clear benefit on restoration of hip geometry and dislocation rate. An exploratory study

Modular necks were introduced in total hip arthroplasty (THA) to improve restoration of hip-geometry and reduce dislocation-rates. This presumed advantage was evaluated retrospectively for patients with arthritis in otherwise anatomically normal hips. Restoration of hip-geometry was assessed on preoperative and postoperative calibrated radiographs in 95 consecutive primary THAs with a modular neck design and compared with 95 match controlled THAs with a similar monoblock stem. No significant differences were seen in restoration of body moment arm, leg length and cupangle. Offset restoration revealed a borderline significant difference (P = 0.48) with higher values for the monoblock stem. In both groups 4 dislocations within one year were encountered. In this study modular necks did not reveal a clear benefit in restoring hip geometry and dislocation rate after straightforward THA.

Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with Retained Acetabular Component

BACKGROUND

Aseptic loosening and osteolysis commonly limit the survivorship of total hip prostheses. Retention of a well-fixed acetabular component, rather than full acetabular revision, has multiple advantages, but questions have lingered regarding the clinical success and prosthetic survivorship following this procedure. We examined the impact of acetabular component position, polyethylene type, liner insertion technique, femoral head size, and simultaneous revision of the entire femoral component (as opposed to head and liner exchange) or bone-grafting on mid-term to long-term prosthetic survival following such limited revisions.

METHODS

One hundred hips in 100 patients with osteolysis, polyethylene wear, or femoral component loosening underwent revision total hip arthroplasty with retention of the acetabular component. Acetabular component inclination and anteversion were measured on prerevision radiographs and were categorized according to predetermined positional safe zones (inclination of 35° to 55° and anteversion of 5° to 25°). Operative reports were reviewed for femoral head size, polyethylene liner type (conventional or highly cross-linked), liner insertion technique (use of the existing locking mechanism or cementation), whether the patient had revision of the entire femoral component, and use of bone graft. Outcomes of interest included the Harris hip score, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score, episodes of instability, and need for repeat revision.

RESULTS

At an average of 6.6 years (range, two to fourteen years) postoperatively, the Harris hip and UCLA activity scores were both significantly improved compared with the preoperative scores (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.01, respectively). Overall, the failure rate was 13%. In addition, 6% of the patients had postoperative instability. Hips in which the acetabular component was outside of the safe zone for inclination had a higher rate of failure (p = 0.048). Use of conventional, rather than highly cross-linked, polyethylene at the time of revision was also associated with an increased rate of repeat revision (p = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

Revision total hip arthroplasty with retention of the acetabular component is associated with good outcomes in hips with an appropriately positioned, well-fixed acetabular component. Acetabular components outside the safe zone for inclination were at a higher risk for failure, as was use of conventional polyethylene.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty

Dislocation remains one of the most common complications after total hip arthroplasty, regardless of the surgical approach. While multiple reasons as laxity, implant position, improper implant choice, and impingement etc. might be leading factors for dislocation, an exact identification of the exact reason is of major importance, to plan for a proper surgical or nonsurgical correction. This article describes in detail the definition, etiology, reduction, and possible treatment options for dislocation after primary and revision total hip arthroplasty that are currently used at the Endo Klinik in Hamburg. It furthermore includes a distinct overview of possible surgical treatment options, based on the main pathology leading to dislocation.

A novel method for accurate and reproducible functional cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty

Cup positioning is an important variable for short and long term function, stability, and durability of total hip arthroplasty (THA). This novel method utilizes internal and external bony landmarks, and the transverse acetabular ligament for positioning the acetabular component. The cup is placed parallel and superior to the transverse ligament and inside the anterior wall notch of the true acetabulum, then adjusted for femoral version and pelvic tilt and obliquity based on weight bearing radiographs. In 78 consecutive THAs, the mean functional anteversion and abduction angles were 17.9° ± 4.7° and 41.7° ± 3.8°, respectively. 96% of the functional anteversion measurements and 100% of the functional abduction angles were within the safe zone. This technique is an easy, reproducible, and accurate method for functional cup placement.

Using the transverse acetabular ligament as a landmark for acetabular anteversion: an intra-operative measurement

PURPOSE. To measure the transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) anteversion in hips with severe deformity, using fluoroscopy-computed tomographic navigation. METHODS. 31 hips in 10 men and 19 women aged 40 to 78 (mean, 58.7) years who underwent total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis (n=6) or osteoarthritis secondary to developmental hip dysplasia (n=19) or congenital hip dislocation (n=6) were included. The severity of hip dislocation was classified according to the Crowe classification; 15 hips were grade 1, 7 were grade 2, 3 were grade 3, and 6 were grade 4. The TAL anteversion was measured using fluoroscopy-computed tomographic navigation. The difference in TAL anteversion between non-dislocated hips (Crowe grade 1, n=15) and dislocated hips (Crowe grades 2-4, n=16) was compared. RESULTS. In all 31 hips, the TAL could be visualised intra-operatively. No patient reported severe pain, early wear, loosening, or dislocation after 2 years. The mean TAL anteversion and inclination angles measured by the navigation system were 26.5 (SD, 8.9; range, 8-42) degrees and 41.5 (SD, 4.6; range, 32-49) degrees, respectively. 22 of the 31 hips were in the safe zone. TAL anteversion in non-dislocated and dislocated hips was not significantly different. Inter- and intra-observer mean absolute differences in TAL anteversion were 0.3 and 0.4 degree, respectively. CONCLUSION. The TAL is a useful anatomic landmark for total hip arthroplasty in dislocated hips.

An evaluation of CT-scan to locate the femoral head centre and its implication for hip surgeons

PURPOSE

The aim of this preliminary study was to determine the accuracy of CT-scan to locate the femoral head centre.

METHODS

Eleven dried femurs were included for study. Three techniques were compared to determine femoral head centre (FHC) location: CT-scan, Motion Analysis and Faro-Arm. Markers were stuck on each femur to create a system of coordinates. Femurs lied on their posterior parts (bicondylar plane). Several points around the femoral head were palpated (Motion Analysis and Faro-Arm) or determined (Amira software for CT-scans). By a least-square regression method, the FHC location in 3D was defined for each technique.

RESULTS

The results of the FHC location determined by the CT-scan technique were compared with those measured by the faro-arm and the Motion Analysis techniques. The coordinates (X, Y, Z) of the FHC were compared between the three methods, and no statistical difference was found (p = 0.99). In a 3D plot, this gave a mean difference of 1.3 mm. The mean radius of the femoral head was of 22.5 mm (p = 0.6).

CONCLUSIONS

CT-scan is as accurate and reliable as gold-standard techniques (motion and faro-arm). Locating FHC before and after hip arthroplasty would allow hip surgeons to determine and compare 3D orientation of the upper-end of femur: offset, height and anteversion.

Which factors determine the wear rate of large-diameter metal-on-metal hip replacements? Multivariate analysis of two hundred and seventy-six components

BACKGROUND

Determining the relationship between clinical factors and engineering analysis of retrieved hip implants can help our understanding of the mechanism of device failure. This is particularly important for metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties because the most common cause of failure is unexplained. We sought to understand the variation in wear rates in a large series of retrieved metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty components.

METHODS

We prospectively recorded preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data to study the effect on both head and cup wear rates of the following variables: patient sex, cause of failure, manufacturer type, resurfacing or modular design, blood cobalt and chromium levels, edge-loading, femoral head size, and cup inclination angle. We analyzed 276 components (138 femoral head and acetabular cup couples) retrieved from failed metal-on-metal hip replacements.

RESULTS

We found a high rate of edge-loading (64%), but only forty-three (31%) of 138 hips had a cup inclination angle of >55°. Multivariate analysis showed that the most important factor responsible for the variation in wear rate was the presence or absence of edge-loading, even when adjusted for cup inclination angle. Strong positive correlations were found between acetabular cup and femoral head wear rates and between wear rates and both blood cobalt and chromium ion levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Multivariate analysis of nine factors found that edge-loading was the most important predictor of wear rate and occurred in two-thirds of failed metal-on-metal hip replacements. The majority did not have excessive cup inclination angles: 68% had an inclination angle of ≤55°. This finding, together with the relatively low median wear rate of the components in our study, suggests that cup position and/or wear rate may not be the only outcome related to failure of metal-on-metal hip replacements.

Positioning of the acetabular component in cemented prostheses - radiographic calculation

OBJECTIVE

to assess the reliability of the inclination angle and anteversion of acetabular cup component in patients with idiopatic osteoarthritis of the hip, aseptic necrosis and hip neck fracture using trigonometric formula and plain radiographs.

METHODS

66 patients underwent cemented total arthroplasty of 72 hips. The inclination of acetabular component was measured using plain radiograph. The acetabular component anteversion was measured using trigonometric formula.

RESULTS

it was observed that, in the osteoarthritic hips, hip neck fracture and aseptic necrosis, the degree of agreement was highly significant (p < 0.0001), in the measurements of anteversion and inclination angles, among the three assessments, from intra as well as inter-observers. All the agreement pairs were of excellent degree (ICC > 0.80).

CONCLUSION

using plain radiographs and trigonometric formula, the method resulted to be highly accurate and reliable. Besides being easy to be calculated. No significant variation was found in the anteversion and inclination angles when compared with osteoarthritis of the hip, aseptic necrosis and hip neck fracture.

Combined anteversion of the total hip arthroplasty implanted with image-free cup navigation and without stem navigation

In total hip arthroplasty (THA), combined anteversion (CA), the sum of cup anteversion (AV) and stem antetorsion (AT) are used as parameters to assess the appropriateness of overall prosthetic alignment. In this study, we evaluated the CA value based on the post-operative computed tomography (CT) measurements in our patient population who underwent THA using the OrthoPilot™ image-free navigation system (B/BRAUN-Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany). During surgery, cup alignment was adjusted with the use of the navigation system while the positioning of the femoral stem was arbitrarily adjusted by the surgeon. Seventy-nine THAs were included in the study. Post-operative CT assessment for the prosthetic alignment showed the average cup inclination and AV values to be 40.5°±4.1° and 20.6°±4.6°, respectively, demonstrating the effectiveness of the navigation system by small values of standard deviation. By contrast, the AT value measured for the stem showed wide variability (mean 23.6°±11.2°). Consequently, the resulting CA was also inconsistent (mean 44.4°±11.2°) and only 61 of the 79 THAs (77.2%) were defined as satisfactory.

Anteversion of the acetabular component aligned with the transverse acetabular ligament in total hip arthroplasty

In total hip arthroplasty (THA), accurately positioning the cup is crucial for achieving an adequate postoperative range of motion and stability. For 47 THA cases in which the inferomedial rim of the cup had been positioned parallel to the transverse acetabular ligament, we retrospectively performed the measurements of the radiographic cup anteversion angle relative to the anterior pelvic plane using 3-dimensional reconstruction computed tomography. The mean anteversion angle was 21.2°, with no significant difference detected in mean cup anteversion between the dysplastic hip group (15 hips) and the control group (15 hips). We suggest that the transverse acetabular ligament is a practical anatomical landmark for determining cup anteversion in THA for both dysplastic and nondysplastic hip cases.

The relationship between the angle of version and rate of wear of retrieved metal-on-metal resurfacings: a prospective, CT-based study

We measured the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components in 45 patients (33 men, 12 women) with a mean age of 53.4 years (30 to 74) who had undergone revision of metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. Three-dimensional CT was used to measure the inclination and version of the acetabular component, femoral version and the horizontal femoral offset, and the linear wear of the removed acetabular components was measured using a roundness machine. We found that acetabular version and combined version of the acetabular and femoral components were weakly positively correlated with the rate of wear. The acetabular inclination angle was strongly positively correlated with the rate of wear. Femoral version was weakly negatively correlated with the rate of wear. Application of a threshold of > 5 μm/year for the rate of wear in order to separate the revisions into low or high wearing groups showed that more high wearing components were implanted outside Lewinnek's safe zone, but that this was mainly due to the inclination of the acetabular component, which was the only parameter that significantly differed between the groups. We were unable to show that excess version of the acetabular component alone or combined with femoral version was associated with an increase in the rate of wear based on our assessment of version using CT.

Photographic measurement of the inclination of the acetabular component in total hip replacement using the posterior approach

The angle of inclination of the acetabular component in total hip replacement is a recognised contributing factor in dislocation and early wear. During non-navigated surgery, insertion of the acetabular component has traditionally been performed at an angle of 45 degrees relative to the sagittal plane as judged by the surgeon's eye, the operative inclination. Typically, the method used to assess inclination is the measurement made on the postoperative anteroposterior radiograph, the radiological inclination. The aim of this study was to measure the intra-operative angle of inclination of the acetabular component on 60 consecutive patients in the lateral decubitus position when using a posterior approach during total hip replacement. This was achieved by taking intra-operative photographs of the acetabular inserter, representing the acetabular axis, and a horizontal reference. The results were compared with the post-operative radiological inclination. The mean post-operative radiological inclination was 13 degrees greater than the photographed operative inclination, which was unexpectedly high. It appears that in the lateral decubitus position with a posterior approach, the uppermost hemipelvis adducts, thus reducing the apparent operative inclination. Surgeons using the posterior approach in lateral decubitus need to aim for a lower operative inclination than when operating with the patient supine in order to achieve an acceptable radiological inclination.

Basic science considerations in primary total hip replacement arthroplasty

Total Hip Replacement is one of the most common operations performed in the developed world today. An increasingly ageing population means that the numbers of people undergoing this operation is set to rise. There are a numerous number of prosthesis on the market and it is often difficult to choose between them. It is therefore necessary to have a good understanding of the basic scientific principles in Total Hip Replacement and the evidence base underpinning them. This paper reviews the relevant anatomical and biomechanical principles in THA. It goes on to elaborate on the structural properties of materials used in modern implants and looks at the evidence base for different types of fixation including cemented and uncemented components. Modern bearing surfaces are discussed in addition to the scientific basis of various surface engineering modifications in THA prostheses. The basic science considerations in component alignment and abductor tension are also discussed. A brief discussion on modular and custom designs of THR is also included. This article reviews basic science concepts and the rationale underpinning the use of the femoral and acetabular component in total hip replacement.

Femoral neck anteversion, acetabular anteversion and combined anteversion in the normal Indian adult population: A computed tomographic study

BACKGROUND

Abnormal femoral neck anteversion (FNA) and/or acetabulum anteversion (AA) have long been implicated in the etiogenesis of hip osteoarthritis (OA), developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), and impingement, instability and wear in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Since studies on the Indian population are sparse on this topic, the purpose of this study was to report the normal values of FNA, AA and the combined anteversion (CA= FNA+ AA) in Indian adults.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

FNA, AA and CA were prospectively measured in 172 normal hips in 86 Indian adults using standardized computed tomographic (CT) methods and this data was compared with the established Western values.

RESULTS

The median values and interquartile ranges were 8 degrees (6.5-10.0 degrees ) for FNA, 19 degrees (16.0-22.0 degrees ) for AA and 27 degrees (23.5-30.0 degrees ) for CA. AA and CA values were significantly (P<0.05) lower in males, and there was also a trend towards lower FNA in males. Although a negative correlation was observed between the FNA and AA, this was not strong and may not be clinically relevant.

CONCLUSION

When compared with the Western data, the FNA values were 3-12 degrees lower and the CA values were 3-5 degrees lower in Indian adults. The AA values were comparable, but were skewed towards the higher side. Further studies are needed to assess the clinical relevance of our basic science data in pathogenesis of OA, and to validate it in relation to hip surgeries like corrective osteotomies and THA.