Safety of combined use of local anesthetic infiltration and reinfusion drains in total knee arthroplasty

Safety of blood reinfusion drains after local infiltration analgesia in total joint replacement

BACKGROUND

Local infiltration analgesia (LIA) is frequently administered to patient undergoing joint replacement surgical procedures. The aim of the present research was to verify the safety of collected shed blood to be reinfused postoperatively, by measuring levobupivacaine levels in drainage blood in patients undergoing LIA during knee replacement surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

24 patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and 12 scheduled for total hip arthroplasty (THA) who received intraoperative LIA were considered. Blood samples were collected from shed blood which was present in drainage 2 and 5 hours after surgery and serum was analysed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

At 2 hours postoperatively, the median levobupivacaine serum concentration in the collected shed blood was 1.2 mg/L (SD: 4.2) for TKA and 17.13 mg/L (SD: 24.4) for THA. At 5 hours, levobupivacaine concentration was 1.84 mg/L (SD: 2.2) for TKA and 17.5 mg/L (SD: 25.2) for THA. Higher values of average serum levobupivacaine concentration were reported in drains collected from patients who had undergone THA compared to TKA (p<0.001). BMI significantly influenced levels of serum drug, that resulted to be higher in patients with BMI<25 (p= 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Levobupivacaine from collected shed blood that would have been returned to the patient, was below toxicity level at 2 and 5 hours after LIA during total joint replacement. The average serum levobupivacaine concentration was found to be higher in drains taken from THA patients than TKA patients. Patients with lower BMI demonstrated the highest levels of levobupivacaine in shed blood and a lower blood volume needed for central nervous system toxicity. Therefore, in patients with a lower BMI undergoing THA, anaesthetic dosage should be reduced or autotransfusion should be avoided to prevent potential risks of toxicity.

Are reinfusion drains safe to use with periarticular liposomal bupivacaine? An analysis of systemic bupivacaine toxicity

Background

Intraoperative periarticular injection (PAI) with local anesthetic is an important component of multimodal pain control in total joint arthroplasty (TJA). A potential risk of this practice is serum anesthetic toxicity resulting from the autotransfusion of blood collected from a reinfusion drain. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the levels of bupivacaine in blood collected in an autotransfusion system after use of a PAI in TJA.

Methods

In this prospective study, each TJA patient had an identical PAI consisting of 20 cc of liposomal bupivacaine, 30 cc of 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine, and 10 cc of normal saline. An autologous reinfusion drain was utilized in all patients. At 2 and 5 hours postoperatively, blood was collected from the autotransfusion canister and sent to the laboratory to quantify bupivacaine levels. The sums of these levels were compared to the lowest reported serum bupivacaine dose associated with toxicity (1.1 mg/kg).

Results

Eleven unilateral TJA patients were enrolled (6 total knee arthroplasties, 5 total hip arthroplasties). The average 2-hour serum bupivacaine level was 2.9 μg (range 0.8-5.6) while the average 5-hour serum bupivacaine level was 4.5 μg (range 0.4-10.0). The average sum of the 2-hour and 5-hour serum bupivacaine level was 5.6 μg (range 0.8-13.6). Each of the 11 patient samples were well below their minimum serum bupivacaine dose toxicity.

Conclusions

Use of a reinfusion drain after PAI with liposomal bupivacaine in TJA appears safe, as bupivacaine levels in the autotransfused blood remains well below the reported minimum serum toxic dose.

Level of Evidence

IV.

Transdermal fentanyl patch improves post-operative pain relief and promotes early functional recovery in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomised, controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a 12.5 μg/h transdermal fentanyl patch (TFP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-two patients scheduled for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were recruited in the study. They were randomly divided into two groups: patients provided with a transdermal fentanyl patch (Group TFP) and those provided with non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (Group NSAID). The patients in the TFP and NSAID groups had mean ages of 70.1 years (range 36-86 years) and 73.5 years (range 32-86 years), respectively. Post-operative pain intensity was measured using the visual analogue scale both at rest and during movement (mVAS). We also evaluated lower leg functional recovery and adverse events.

RESULTS

The mean mVAS scores were not different between the two groups on post-operative day 4, but were significantly smaller in the TFP group than in the NSAID group on post-operative days 7 (p = 0.0026) and 14 (p = 0.007). Muscle strength recovered faster in the TFP group than in the NSAID group, the percentage of pre-operative strength being significantly greater in the former than in the latter on post-operative days 7 (p = 0.027) and 14 (p = 0.047). Furthermore, there were no remarkable adverse events in patients using TFP.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that a 12.5 μg/h TFP can improve post-operative pain relief and promotes early functional recovery following total knee arthroplasty.

Systematic review of high-volume multimodal wound infiltration in total knee arthroplasty

Pain relief following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is challenging because early mobilization and rehabilitation are essential for a successful outcome. Postoperative pain can limit recovery, leading to reduced mobility and prolonged hospitalization. There are potential benefits of infiltrating high volumes of local anesthetics around the soft tissues of replaced hip and knee joints. The risk of systemic toxicity is minimized with diluted local anesthetic solution, which also allows a high volume to be used. One of the principal advantages is that analgesia agents are administered intraoperatively by the surgeon, thereby minimizing the need for additional invasive procedures. The authors conducted a systematic review to evaluate whether high-volume multimodal wound infiltration reduces pain and opiate intake while enhancing early rehabilitation and discharge when used in patients undergoing TKA. Only randomized controlled studies were included. Although better pain relief in the immediate postoperative period with wound infiltration is gained after TKA, there is no definite evidence that this leads to a reduction in opiate consumption, the achievement of early milestones, or a reduction in hospital stay. The roles of individual agents in achieving pain relief and the use of percutaneous wound catheter for postoperative doses are also unclear. There are few reports of complications, including falls and delayed mobilization, when femoral nerve blocks are used. Wound infiltration analgesia should be used at the preference of the surgeon and anesthetist provided regular review of their practice is undertaken to identify any untoward side effects. Further randomized trials with sufficient sample size comparing each outcome, including pain scores, opiate consumption, and length of hospital stay, should be undertaken.

Is femoral nerve block necessary during total knee arthroplasty?: a randomized controlled trial

There remains a lack of randomized controlled trials comparing methods of perioperative analgesia for total knee arthroplasty. To address this deficiency, a blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the use of femoral nerve block (group F) and local anesthetic (group L). A sample of 55 patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomized to either group. No significant differences in the most severe pain score or 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), or Oxford scores were observed between groups. However, the Knee Society score was significantly higher in group F. In addition, group F used significantly fewer micrograms of intravenous fentanyl in the first 24 hours. Balancing the risks of femoral nerve block with those of increased systemic narcotic delivery should be performed on a case-by-case basis.

Use of reduced-dose periarticular injection for pain management in simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty

We investigated the safety and efficacy of the bilateral periarticular multimodal drug injection (PMDI) at a reduced dosage in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (SBTKA). In total, 45 patients undergoing SBTKA received 65 mL PMDI in each knee (reduced-dose group). The incidence of drug-related adverse effects and wound complications were evaluated. Pain levels during the night of the operation and postoperative day 1 and opioid consumption during the first 24 hours after surgery were compared with the regular-dose group of 55 patients undergoing SBTKA who received 100 mL of PMDI in 1 knee. No patient experienced a serious drug-related adverse effect or wound complication. Blood levels of ropivacaine were observed to be lower than a toxic level throughout the monitored period in all patients examined. Patients in the reduced-dose group experienced less pain during the night of operation, but a similar pain level at postoperative day 1.

Autologous blood transfusion after local infiltration analgesia with ropivacaine in total knee and hip arthroplasty

Aims. To study the safety of autotransfusion following local infiltration analgesia (LIA) with ropivacaine. Background. Knowledge of blood concentrations of ropivacaine after LIA and autotransfusion is crucial. However, very limited data are available for toxicological risk assessment. Methods. Autotransfusion was studied in patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA: n = 25) and total hip arthroplasty (THA: n = 27) with LIA using 200 mg ropivacaine, supplemented with two postoperative bolus injections (150 mg ropivacaine). Drainage blood was reinfused within 6 h postoperatively. Results. Reinfusion caused a significant increase in the serum concentration of total ropivacaine for TKA from 0.54 ± 0.17 (mean ± SD) to 0.79 ± 0.20 μg/mL (P < 0.001) and a nonsignificant increase for THA from 0.62 ± 0.17 to 0.63 ± 0.18 μg/mL. The maximum free (unbound) concentration after reinfusion was 0.038 μg/mL. Peak total and free venous ropivacaine concentrations after 8 h and 16 h postoperative bolus injections were 2.6 μg/mL and 0.11 μg/mL, respectively. All concentrations observed were below the threshold for toxicity and no side effects were observed. Conclusion. Autotransfusion of patients undergoing knee or hip arthroplasty after local infiltration analgesia with 200 mg ropivacaine can be performed safely, even supplemented with 8 h and 16 h postoperative bolus injections.

Management and treatment of local anaesthetic toxicity

Local anaesthetics have been used within surgical practice since the late 1800s, when the ophthalmologist Carl Koller discovered the tissue numbing properties of cocaine (Odedra & Lyons 2010). Since that time, the ongoing development of anaesthetic drugs has provided many different local anaesthetics (LA) to clinical practice. The techniques for using these drugs in surgical practice have also developed, shaping the modern practices we know today. Increasing numbers of surgical procedures are now carried out under LA that once necessitated general anaesthetic, for example carotid endarterectomy as first described by Eastcott et al (1954). This type of procedure can now be safely carried out under LA but does require a large volume of the drug (up to 25 mls, see Table 1 for variations) to infiltrate a very vascular surgical field, and the LA may need supplementing during surgery (AIIman & Wilson 2006). The practice of routinely injecting large volumes of LA agents into surgical wounds to aid post-operative pain control also increases the risk of inadvertent intravascular injection that couldlead to LA toxicity (Parker et al 2009).

Blood reinfusion combined with femoral nerve block in total knee replacement for patients with increased risk of bleeding

PURPOSE

To compare patients with increased risk of bleeding who received combined blood reinfusion and femoral nerve block in total knee replacement (TKR) to regular patients treated routinely with respect to pain relief, blood loss, and knee function.

METHODS

In a consecutive series of 67 patients who underwent unilateral TKR, 12 patients with increased risk of bleeding owing to cardiac disease or previous thromboembolic events received continuous femoral nerve block and blood reinfusion, without tranexamic acid (TA) injection. The remaining 55 patients were controls who received standard postoperative treatment (TA injection, local injection of analgesics, and suction drainage without reinfusion). The volume of blood loss (drained or reinfused), pain score (using a visual analogue scale) and knee function (using the Knee Society Score [KSS]) in the 2 groups were compared.

RESULTS

In the study group, patients were 5 years older and tended to have a lower preoperative KSS function score (35 vs. 45, p=0.08) and a higher function-related pain score (6.5 vs. 6, p=0.10). The mean volume of drained blood wasted in the study group did not differ significantly from the mean total volume of drained blood in the control group (235 vs. 300 ml, p=0.14). Similarly, the mean decrease in postoperative haemoglobin concentration did not differ significantly between the respective groups (2.1 vs. 2.1 mmol/l, p=0.97). A significantly greater proportion of patients received allogenic blood transfusion in the study group than in controls (3/12 vs. 2/55, p<0.01). The study group exhibited significantly higher pain scores during training (1.7 vs. 1.4, p=0.03) and lower escape oxycodone consumption (5 vs. 15 mg/kg, p=0.06) on postoperative day 1 (but not other days). The duration of hospitalisation was also longer (5.5 vs. 4 days, p=0.04).

CONCLUSION

In TKR patients with increased risk of bleeding, blood reinfusion combined with femoral nerve block is safe and comparable to standard methods of pain control (local injection of analgesics).