Minimum 5-year follow-up of a cementless, modular, tapered stem in hip revision arthroplasty

Petersen M, Stürup J, Winther NS. Implant Survival of an Uncemented Modular Femoral Implant in Patients With Severe Femoral Bone Loss and 2-Stage Hip Revision

Background and Purpose: Revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) is a challenging procedure especially in the presence of severe bone loss where implant fixation is compromised. The aim of this study was to evaluate implant survival, clinical outcome, and midterm results in a group of complex patients after femoral revision using an uncemented modular implant design. Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective study including 100 patients (101 hips) treated with revision THA using an uncemented modular implant design. We identified 51 hips as Paprosky types I-II and 50 hips as Paprosky III-IV bone defects. We reviewed operative reports and radiographs. Patients underwent a clinical examination to assess the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and completed patient-reported outcome measures (PROM), including the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and the EQ-5D Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Minimum follow-up was 2 years (average, 5.8 years; range, 2.0-9.4 years). Results: Among the cases, 46 hips were revised for infection in a 2-stage procedure and 44 hips for aseptic loosening. 11 hips had periprosthetic fractures of Vancouver type B2 or B3. A total of 5 hips required revision with removal of the femoral implant and 11 patients experienced complications resulting in fracture (n = 1), dislocation (n = 10), and soft tissue revision (n = 1). The 5-year implant survival estimated by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was 95% (95%-CI: 91%-99%). All hips had radiographic evidence of osseointegration and no one with subsidence greater than 5 mm. Additionally, 80% showed radiographic evidence of restoration of proximal femoral bone. Mean HHS was 78. Conclusion: In complex cases of revision THA, using a modular revision femoral system yielded promising results. The 5-year implant survival estimated by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was 95% (95%-CI: 91%-99%), with all hips demonstrating radiographic evidence of osseointegration and no one with subsidence greater than 5 mm. Notably 80% showed radiographic evidence of restoration of proximal femoral bone.

Clinical outcomes and survival rates of a uncemented modular revision stem system in hip arthroplasty: a 10-year single-institution study on a frail population

INTRODUCTION

The increasing prevalence of primary hip arthroplasty has led to a parallel rise in revision cases. Femoral revision often entails compromised bone integrity, requiring consideration of various solutions for optimal reconstructive options. Despite technological advancements, there is limited evidence on the clinical outcomes of the latest modular revision stems. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and survival rates of next generation uncemented modular revision stem in patients undergoing hip revision surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective single-center study assessed the survival and failure causes of a specific uncemented modular stem in 48 patients undergoing hip revision surgery between 2012 and 2022. Data included preoperative parameters, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes measured through clinical and radiographic assessments. Forty-eight patients (25 males, 23 females; mean age 72 years) were included, with a mean Charlson Comorbidity Index of 5. Preoperative diagnoses varied, with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) being the most common (45.8%), followed by periprosthetic fractures (27.1%). Partial revisions occurred in 60.4%, total revisions in 39.6%. According to Paprosky classification of femoral bone loss, type II and III were the most represented, respectively 35.4% and 50%.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 4.6 years, stem survival was 92.5%. Complications (20%) included dislocation, PJI, fracture, and loosening; the overall reoperation rate was 12.5%. The SF-12 physical score was 43.6, while the mental score was 51.1. The HOOS score was 71.8, and the HHS score was 71.4. Radiographic analysis identified nonprogressive osteolysis in 15.1% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study on this uncemented modular revision stem demonstrated favorable outcomes in an elder fragile population with moderate to severe femoral bone loss. The implant's modularity provides versatility in addressing various defects, without any implant breakage observed during the study period. Literature comparison highlighted similar outcomes despite sample size differences. The promising results warrant continued investigation into the long-term survivorship of this modular stem system.

Implant breakage and revision factors for modular fluted tapered stems in revision total hip arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Modular stems in revision total hip arthroplasties allow diaphyseal fixation and optimal restoration of the architecture of the proximal femur. Several studies report metaphyseal implant breakage having a negative impact on survivorship. The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcome of an uncemented modular fluted tapered stem (MFT) in revision surgery.

METHODS

In a retrospective study, 316 patients who had revision surgery using the same design of MFT implant (Modular Revision Stem [MRS], Lima Corporate, Italy) between 2012 and 2017 were identified. Patients were male in 51% of cases and mean age was 74 years. Indications were 110 periprosthetic fractures, 98 periprosthetic joint infection, 97 aseptic loosening, 10 instability and 1 other cause. Survivorship, complications, clinical and radiographic outcomes, were assessed. Mean follow-up was 5 years.

RESULTS

There was no implant breakage. At 5-year follow-up, the survivorship, free from revision for aseptic loosening and free of revision for any reason were 96% and 87%, respectively. At last follow-up (8 years), these figures were 92% and 71%, respectively. 31 implants were revised. The risk of revision for any cause was higher for extreme length metaphyseal implants, hazard ratio was 3.7 (95% CI, 1.82-7.52). A mean stem subsidence of 9 mm was noted in 37 cases; 4 were revised for aseptic loosening. The Harris Hip Score at final follow-up was 82.

CONCLUSIONS

At 5-year follow-up, the MFT implant showed a good survivorship and outcomes with no specific complications. Unlike literature reports, no specific complications occurred with this design. Stem junction positioning and therefore metaphyseal length may be key to optimise long-term survivorship. However, a longer follow-up is needed as implant breakage is more often seen after long implantation times.

Survival and complications at a minimum 5years' follow-up of the modular Mark-2 Extreme™ cementless femoral stem: Does the reduced modularity resolve the mechanical issues of the Mark-I stem?

INTRODUCTION

The Extreme™ modular stem was developed for implant revision with metaphyseal-diaphyseal defect. Due to the high breakage rate, a new "reduced modularity" design has been introduced, but without reported results. We therefore conducted a retrospective assessment of (1) overall stem survival, (2) functional results, (3) osseointegration, and (4) the rate of complications, and notably of mechanical failure.

HYPOTHESIS

Reduced modularity reduces the risk of revision surgery for mechanical failure.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty-five prostheses were implanted between January 2007 and December 2010 in 42 patients with severe bone defect (Paprosky≥III) or periprosthetic shaft fracture. Mean age was 69.6years (range: 44-91years). Minimum follow-up was 5years, for a mean 115.4months (range: 60-156months). The main study endpoint was femoral stem survival, counting all-cause explantation as event. Functional assessment comprised subjective rating of satisfaction, Postel Merle d'Aubigné (PMA) and Harris Hip scores, and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS). Whether the revision assembly was carried out in situ, in the patient's hip, or outside, on the operating table, was not known in 2 cases; in the other 43, assembly was in situ in 15 cases (35%) and on the operating table in 28 (65%).

RESULTS

Five-year stem survival was 75.7% (95% CI: 61.9-89.5%), taking all causes of change together. Seventeen patients (45.9%) had complications, 13 (35.1%) requiring revision surgery, including 10 (27.0%) for stem replacement. Five patients (13.5%) had steam breakage at the junction between the metaphysis and the diaphyseal stem, 4 of which occurred within 2 years of implantation or of fixation of a periprosthetic fracture. Mean preoperative Harris score was 48.4 [IQR (25-75% interquartile range): 37-58] and PMA score 11.1 (IQR: 10-12), compared to respectively 74 (IQR: 67-89) and 13.6 (IQR: 12.5-16) at follow-up. Mean FJS at follow-up was 71.5 (IQR: 61-94.5). In the 15 in situ assemblies, there were 3 breakages (20%), compared to 2 (7.1%) in the 28 table assemblies (p=0.21).

DISCUSSION

The stem breakage rate was high despite the reduced modularity, which concentrated all stress on a single junction but without reducing the risk of mechanical failure. Surgical technique was faulty in some cases, with in situ assembly of the metaphysis after implanting the diaphyseal stem, which does not respect the manufacturer's recommendations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; retrospective study.

Femoral offset restoration affects the early outcome of revision in patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures of Vancouver B2 - a single-center retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Femoral offset (FO) restoration plays an important role in improving the prognosis and quality of life of patients undergoing hip replacement. However, it is not given enough attention in revisions among patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPFFs); instead, more attention is given to reduction, fixation of fractures and stabilizing prostheses. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of FO restoration on the function of the hip joint in revisions of patients with PPFF of Vancouver B2. Moreover, we studied whether there is a difference in FO restoration between modular and nonmodular stems.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 20 patients with PPFF of Vancouver B2 revised with a tapered fluted modular titanium stem and 22 patients with PPFF of Vancouver B2 revised with a tapered fluted nonmodular titanium stem from 2016 to 2021 was conducted. Based on the difference between the FO of the affected side and that of the healthy side, 26 patients were allocated into Group A (difference ≤ 4 mm), and 16 patients were allocated into Group B (difference > 4 mm). The postoperative Harris Hip Score (HHS), range of motion of the hip joint, length of both lower limbs and dislocation were compared between Group A and Group B. The proportions of patients with FO restoration (difference ≤ 4 mm) and stem subsidence were compared between the modular and nonmodular groups.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time was 34.3 ± 17.3 months, and all cases achieved fracture healing at the last visit. Patients in Group A had a higher HHS, larger range of abduction, fewer dislocations and less limb length discrepancy (LLD). Patients in the modular group had a higher proportion of FO restoration and less subsidence.

CONCLUSION

FO restoration improves postoperative hip joint function and reduces dislocation and LLD in revisions of patients with PPFF of Vancouver B2. Compared with nonmodular prostheses, modular prostheses tend to be easier for FO restoration under complex circumstances.

The Early- to Mid-term Outcome of Novel Cementless Modular Femoral Stem in East Asian Patients

Background

Early firm fixation of the femoral implant is crucial in total hip arthroplasty (THA) with unstable metaphysis or a large degree of femoral bone loss. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of THA using a novel cementless modular, fluted, tapered stem in such cases.

Methods

From 2015 to 2020, 105 hips (101 patients) had surgery performed by two surgeons at two tertiary hospitals using a cementless modular, fluted, tapered stem for periprosthetic fractures, massive bone loss, prosthetic joint infection sequelae, or tumorous condition. Clinical outcomes, radiographic results, and survivorship of the implant were evaluated.

Results

The average follow-up period was 2.8 years (range, 1-6.2 years). The Koval grade was 2.7 ± 1.7 preoperatively and maintained at 1.2 ± 0.8 at the latest follow-up. The plain radiograph showed bone ingrowth fixation in 89 hips (84.8%). The average stem subsidence at postoperative 1 year was 1.6 ± 3.2 mm (range, 0-11.0 mm). Five reoperations (4.8%) were needed, including 1 for acute periprosthetic fracture, 1 for recurrent dislocation, and 3 for chronic periprosthetic joint infection. Kaplan-Meier survivorship with reoperation for any reason as the endpoint was 94.1%.

Conclusions

The early- to mid-term results of THA with the novel cementless modular, fluted, tapered THA stem system were satisfactory clinically and radiologically. The shortcomings inherent to its modularity were not identified. This modular femoral system may provide adequate fixation and be a practical option in the setting of complicated THA.

EBRA Migration Analysis of a Modular, Distally Fixed Stem in Hip Revision Arthroplasty: A Clinical and Radiological Study

Background: Massive osteolysis of the proximal femur makes stem revision a challenging procedure. EBRA-FCA provides the opportunity to determine stem migration, which is considered a predictive factor for implant survival. In this study, we aimed to analyze the migration behavior of a modular, distally fixed reconstruction prosthesis. Methods: Applying a retrospective study design, we reviewed all consecutive patients who received a cementless MP reconstruction prosthesis (Waldemar Link GmbH & Co. KG, Hamburg, Germany) at our Department between 2005 and 2019. We reviewed medical histories and performed radiological measurements using EBRA-FCA software. Results: A total of 67 stems in 62 patients (female 26; male 36) fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Mean age at surgery was 68.0 (range 38.7−88.44) years. EBRA migration analysis showed a median subsidence of 1.6 mm (range 0.0−20.6) at 24 months. The angle between stem and femur axis was 0.3° (range 0.0°−2.9°) at final follow-up. No correlation between body mass index and increased subsidence was found (p > 0.05). Overall revision-free rate amounted to 92.5% and revision-free rate for aseptic loosening to 98.5%. Furthermore, no case of material breakage was detected. Conclusions: In summary, the MP reconstruction prosthesis showed low subsidence and reduction in the migration rate over the investigated follow-up. Based on this, the modular stem can be considered as a good therapy option in challenging stem revisions offering various options to address the individual anatomical situation.

Does metaphyseal modularity in femoral revision stems have a role in treating bone defects less severe than IIIB? Clinical and radiological results of a series of 163 modular femoral stems

INTRODUCTION

Revision for loosening of femoral stems requires an extensive analysis of bone defects to determine the most appropriate course of action. The drawbacks of using modular stems are that they can break or corrode at their junction. They have rarely been evaluated based on the extent of bone loss and particularly in patients with less severe bone loss. This led us to carry out a retrospective study to analyze modular femoral stems as a function of the initial bone defect (stage IIIB versus less severe in the Paprosky classification): 1) implant survivorship, 2) osteointegration and subsidence of the stem, and 3) breakage of implant.

HYPOTHESIS

Modular femoral stems can be used for all types of bone defects (not only IIIB) as the complication rate is identical.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 2016, 163 patients were included who had received a modular femoral revision stem. The minimum follow-up was 4 years; the mean was 6.7 years±3.3 [4-21]. One patient was lost to follow-up, 88 had died before the analysis date and 74 were still alive; however, 10 of them had the stem removed less than 4 years after implantation. Thus 64 patients were available for the clinical evaluation. There were 44% (72 patients) with Paprosky stage IIIB femoral bone loss and 56% (91 patients) with stage I, II or IIIA bone loss. The stem's bone integration was evaluated using the Engh and Massin score. All complications were documented.

RESULTS

The survivorship of the femoral stem was 93.75% (95% CI: 83.33-96.70) at 5 years with removal for any reason as the end point. There was no significant difference (p=0.0877) in survivorship relative to the severity of the initial bone loss: 89.84% (95% CI: 78.73-95.31) for stage IIIB; 95.23% (95% CI: 82.24-98.79) for stage IIIA; 97.06% (95% CI: 80.90-99.58) for stage II. Bone integration was considered as being achieved in 76% of stems based on available radiographs (119 of 156 patients) with the severity of bone loss having no effect. We found 18 instances of stem subsidence out of 156 stems with available data (11.5%). The mean subsidence was 14.7 mm ± 12.3 [5-40]. Among the 18 stems with postoperative subsidence, 13 had been implanted for stage IIIB defects, while 5 were for less severe defects (p=0.751). Two stem fractures occurred in patients with stage IIIB bone loss, thus 2/66 for stage IIIB and 0/86 in the less severe bone loss cases (p=0.188).

CONCLUSION

Modularity provides similar results no matter the severity of initial bone loss, without the risk of additional complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, Retrospective study.

Clinical, functional and radiographic outcomes after revision total hip arthroplasty with tapered fluted modular or non-modular stems: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to systematically evaluate clinical outcomes of tapered fluted stems, either monoblock or modular, in revision total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science and Cochrane databases were systematically searched by 2 researchers. Clinical studies reporting primarily on survival and re-revision rates, and secondarily on subsidence, dislocation, intraoperative fractures, periprosthetic fractures and infection were included. 2 investigators assessed the quality of the studies.

RESULTS

46 studies were included in this review, reporting on 4601 stem revisions. The pooled re-revision rate was 5.1% and long-term survival ranged from 75% to 98.5%. No differences were observed between monoblock and modular stems regarding re-revision rate, dislocation rate, periprosthetic fracture rate or infection rates. Monoblock stems exhibited more subsidence and modular stems displayed more intraoperative fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

Satisfactory results can be obtained with the use of tapered fluted end-bearing stems. Monoblock stems offer the same clinical results as modular stems.

The survivorship of revision total hip replacement with severe proximal bone deficiency using a modular taper fluted prosthesis

Contemporary uncemented femoral revision hip systems have become commonly used over the past decade and have enabled the reconstruction of leg length, offset and anteversion as independent variables through the use of modular junctions. Modular junction failures between the proximal body and distal stem have been described with revision systems, although this is rare. We sought to identify the survivorship of one revision system in a salvage arthroplasty scenario where no host bone support of the modular junction was present. From a series of 136 patients, 15 patients (16 hips) were identified without host bone support of the modular junction with a mean radiological follow up of over 6 years (76 months +/- 35 months). There have been no cases of prosthetic fracture over the follow-up duration, with two revisions performed for reasons of aseptic loosening and infection. The mean BMI of the study group was 30.2 with 78% of the cohort classified as overweight or obese. It is well recognised that, host bone support of the modular junction is preferable, however the satisfactory outcomes over the midterm in these complex patients suggests that modular revision systems remain an option.

Osteoanabolic Treatment with Teriparatide for Pathological Stress Transfer After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Case Report

CASE

Total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented, tapered, fluted stem was performed in a 79-year-old woman with known osteoporosis to treat an intertrochanteric fracture. Exertional thigh pain and cortical thickening developed at the tip of the stem. The patient was treated with teriparatide for a total of 2 years and became asymptomatic within months. Radiographs showed improved bone quality around the stem of the prosthesis, and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans confirmed remineralization.

CONCLUSION

Stem tip pain is a well-known complication of distally engaging arthroplasty implants. Various surgical options have been suggested to address this condition. Teriparatide is known to help prevent fractures and improve bone healing. This successful off-label use might be of interest for the future treatment of this biomechanical complication.

Midterm results and complications rates in vancouver type B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures treated with modular fluted tapered stems

Evaluate the mid-term success rate of these stems in periprosthetic femur fractures and to analyze the complications observed with the use of these stems.

METHODS

Thirty five patients that underwent hip revision surgery secondary to Vancouver type B2 and B3 periprosthetic femur fracture were evaluated. In all cases, modular fluted tapered stems were used.

RESULTS

Average follow-up was 42 months. Average Postoperative Harris Hip Score (HHS) was 78.11. Fracture healing was obtained in a 100% of the patients. Average implant survival was 50 months.

CONCLUSION

Modular fluted tapered stems demonstrated a high rate implant stability, proximal femoral bone reconstitution, and fracture healing.

Early clinical and radiological outcomes of a new tapered fluted titanium monobloc revision stem in hip arthroplasty

PURPOSE

A new fluted, titanium, monobloc stem with a three degree taper has been designed in an attempt to overcome the challenges associated with femoral reconstruction in the setting of extensive bone loss. The aim of this study was to report its early clinical and radiographic outcomes.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data carried out at a single institution between Jan 2017 and Dec 2019. Forty-three femoral revisions were performed using a new tapered, fluted, titanium, monobloc (TFTM) revision stem. Complications, clinical and radiographic data were obtained from medical records and a locally maintained database. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). All post-operative radiographs were analysed for subsidence, osteolysis and femoral cortical bone remodelling.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 24 months (range 8-42 months). Subsidence of 1.2 mm was noted in one patient. No cases of clinically significant subsidence (> 10 mm) were observed. At final follow-up, a statistically significant improvement was noted in functional outcome scores. The mean OHS preoperatively and at final follow-up were 24 (SD 13) and 42 (SD15). p = 0.04 mean difference 18 (95% CI 15-22). The mean WOMAC scores preoperatively and at final follow-up were 62 (SD23) and 88 (SD7) respectively (p < 0.001, mean difference 26; 95% CI 21-34). No stem fractures were noted within the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

Positive early clinical and radiological outcomes have been observed with this tapered, fluted, titanium, monobloc stem. Based on these results, this implant may be considered as a viable option in the majority of uncemented femoral revisions.

Mid- to Long-Term Outcomes of Cementless Modular, Fluted, Tapered Stem for Massive Femoral Bone Loss in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate mid- to long-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty for massive femoral bone loss using a cementless modular, fluted, tapered stem.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study performed at a single hospital. During the period of January 2007 to January 2015, 33 patients (34 hips) underwent primary revision surgery with cementless modular, fluted, tapered stems due to femoral bone loss. Sixteen men and 17 women were included in the study, with an average age of 63.9 ± 11.7 years (range, 27 to 88 years). Operative data including operative duration, length of incision, drainage volume and duration, blood loss and transfusion, cases of bone graft and extended trochanteric osteotomy were recorded. Clinical evaluation was performed using Harris hip score (HHS), visual analogue scale (VAS), and patients' satisfaction. Radiographic data including femoral stem fixation, subsidence, integrin of allograft bone, and leg length discrepancy were assessed. Complications and survivorship were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival rate.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 9.1 ± 2.5 years (range, 5-13 years). The Harris hip score was 43.6 ± 11.5 preoperatively and maintained at 86.5 ± 6.6 at the time of latest follow-up (P < 0. 05). The X-ray showed bone ingrowth fixation in 30 hips (88%), fibrous stable fixation in three hips (9%), and instability in one hip (3%). The average stem subsidence was 3.9 ± 2.2 mm (range, 1 to 10 mm). The mean difference in leg length in our study was 3.3 ± 2.7 mm (range, 0 to 10 mm), and the leg length discrepancy in 28 (82%) patients was within 5 mm. No case of junction fracture was observed. Seven (21%) intraoperative fractures occurred in our study. Three (9%) cases with infection were observed after revision. Six (18%) patients had lower limb vein thrombosis. The survivorship of prostheses with re-revision for any reason was 95% (95% CI, 12.0 to 13.0) at the 10-year follow-up. Three (9%) re-revisions were needed, including one for aseptic loosening, one for dislocation, and one for infection.

CONCLUSION

The mid- to long-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty with the cementless modular, fluted, tapered stems are encouraging for massive femoral bone loss.

Medium Term Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Using a Modular Tapered Hip Revision Implant

Background

The rate of revision hip arthroplasty surgery is rising. Surgeons must use implants with proven outcomes to help overcome the technical challenges faced during revision surgery. However, outcome studies using these implants are limited. The aim of this study is to investigate the radiographic and clinical outcomes of the Stryker Restoration stem, the most commonly used hip revision stem in the United Kingdom (UK).

Methods

A retrospective review of a single surgeon case series was performed. Immediate postoperative radiographs were analyzed for offset and leg length discrepancy. Radiographic evidence of subsidence was assessed using follow-up radiographs. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was applied using explantation and reoperation as endpoints. Patient-reported outcomes were measured using the Oxford Hip Score and EQ-5D-5L.

Results

One hundred ninety-eight cases were identified. Mean follow-up duration was 51.8 months (range: 24-121). Stem survival during this period was 98%. Reoperation for any reason was 13%. Mean subsidence was 4.18 mm. Analysis of variance testing showed no difference in mean subsidence between revision indications. Mean offset and leg length discrepancies were measured at 4.5 mm and 4.3 mm, respectively. The mean Oxford Hip Score for participants was 27.6.

Conclusions

This series demonstrates excellent implant survival, with radiographic parameters for reconstruction and subsidence levels comparable to those in the existing literature. The tapered modular hip revision stem provides surgeons with the intraoperative flexibility to overcome some of the anatomical difficulties encountered during revision surgery; this is reflected in the radiographic and clinical outcomes of the cohort in this study.

Modular tapered conical revision stem in hip revision surgery: mid- term results

BACKGROUND

The aim of this paper is to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of a fluted tapered modular distal-fixation stem at medium to long-term follow-up. The hypothesis of this investigation was to verify if the use of this implant design may have provided potential advantages in femoral revisions and post-traumatic instances where the restoration of the anatomy was the prime concern.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 62 cases of femoral revision surgeries, performed in Paprosky type IIIA and IIIB bone defects between January 2001 and December 2011 with a mean follow-up of 8.5 ± 1.5 years (range 5.1-15.9 years) where a modular fluted stem was used. The clinical assessment was performed with the Harris Hip Score (HHS), and the radiographic evaluation was carried in order to assess the stability of the femoral component. Intra-operative and postoperative complications were recorded, and the rates of complications and revisions for any cause were determined.

RESULTS

Mean HHS improved 35.4 points from the preoperative assessment. Radiographic evaluation showed a stable stem anchorage in 90.3% of the cases at the last follow-up. Five (8%) implants required additional surgery. Neither breakage of the stem nor loosening of the taper junction were recorded. Kaplan-Meier survivorship was 89.4% (CI: 88.8-90%) for any complication and 92.3% (CI: 91.8-92.7%) according to revision for any causes at 81 months follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that this stem design is a reliable option in cases of complex femoral bone defects, as well as in cases with high functional deficiencies, with promising survivorship.

Revision Hip Arthroplasty Using a Porous-coated or Taper ZMR Implant: Minimum 10-year Follow-up of Implant Survivorship

INTRODUCTION

The Zimmer Modular Revision hip (ZMR) system is available in two stem options, a porous-coated cylindrical (PCM) and a taper (TM) stem. Several concerns have been reported regarding modular implants. Specifically, because of early junctional fractures, the ZMR system was redesigned with a wider modular interface. As such, we designed a study assessing long-term ZMR survivorship and functional and radiographic outcomes.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A search of our institutional research database was performed. A minimum 10-year follow-up was selected. The following two cohorts were created: PCM and TM stems. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed, and causes of stem failure requiring revision surgery were collected. Functional outcomes as per the Harris Hip Score and radiographic stem stability were assessed as per the Engh classification.

RESULTS

A total of 146 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were available for follow-up (PCM = 68, TM = 78). The mean follow-up was 13.4 years clinically and 11.1 years radiographically for the PCM cohort. Similarly, the TM cohort had a follow-up of 11.1 years clinically and 10.5 years radiographically. The Kaplan-Meier survivorships were 87.1% and 87.8% at 15 years for the PCM and TM cohorts, respectively. The most common cause of failure requiring revision surgery overall was aseptic loosening (PCM = 1.4%, TM = 5.6%). The mean postoperative Harris Hip Score was as follows: PCM = 71.2 and TM = 64.7. Engh type I or II stem ingrowth was as follows: PCM = 85% and TM = 68%.

DISCUSSION

Good survivorship using the ZMR stem system can be expected at up to 15 years. Aseptic loosening remains the most commonly encountered problem for both PCM and TM stems. Previously identified modular junctional weakness seem to have been addressed.

Clinical, radiographic, and survivorship analysis of a modular fluted tapered stem in revision hip arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Modular fluted tapered stems are one of the most commonly used implants in femoral revision surgery. Due to the relative lack of studies on the Restoration modular fluted tapered stem, we conducted a study to evaluate its short- to mid-term clinical, radiographic, and survival outcomes.

METHODS

We identified all 45 patients treated with this revision stem at our institution. Five patients did not complete the minimum 2-year follow-up, leaving 40 patients (41 hips) for assessment. Mean follow-up was 5.1 years (range 2-11 years). Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Harris hip score (HHS). Radiographs were evaluated for subsidence and loosening. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed using revision of the stem for any reason as end point.

RESULTS

The mean HHS improved from 44.6 points preoperatively to 78.4 points at the most recent follow-up (p < 0.0001). Nonprogressive subsidence occurred in 83% of the hips (mean 2.8 mm; range 1-7 mm). One stem (2.4%) showed progressive subsidence (20 mm) and was considered loose. The most common cause for reoperation was dislocation (three hips, 7.3%). The 10-year survivorship with revision of the stem for any reason as the end point was 93.5% (95% CI, 84.9-100%).

CONCLUSION

There was a significant improvement in the HHS and a low likelihood of revision at short- to mid-term follow-up, adding to the current evidence base for use of this implant in revision surgery. A longer follow-up and a larger number of cases are necessary to fully evaluate its role and performance.

Is There a Benefit to Modularity for Femoral Revisions When Using a Splined, Tapered Titanium Stem?

BACKGROUND

Proposed benefits of modularity for femoral revisions in total hip arthroplasty (THA) include more precise biomechanical restoration and improved stability, but this has not been proven with use of a splined, tapered design. This study's purpose is to compare (1) complication rates, (2) functional outcomes, and (3) radiographic measures of subsidence, offset, and leg length discrepancy with the use of modular vs monoblock splined, tapered titanium stems in revision THA.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 145 femoral revisions with minimum 2-year follow-up (mean, 5.12 years; range, 2-17.3 years). Patients receiving a modular (67) or monoblock (78) splined, tapered titanium stem for femoral revision were included.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in rates of reoperation (22.3% vs 17.9%; P = .66), intraoperative fracture (9.0% vs 3.8%; P = .30), postoperative fracture (3.0% vs 1.3%; P = .47), dislocation (11.9% vs 5.1%; P = .23), or aseptic loosening (4.5% vs 6.4%; P = .73) between the modular and monoblock cohorts, respectively. There were similar results regarding subsidence >5 mm (10.4% vs 12.8%; P = .22), LLD >1 cm (35.8% vs 38.5%; P = .74), restoration of hip offset (-5.88 ± 10.1 mm vs -5.07 ± 12.1 mm; P = .67), and Harris Hip Score (70.7 ± 17.9 vs 73.9 ± 19.7; P = .36) between groups. Multivariate regression showed no differences in complications (P = .44) or reoperations (P = .20) between groups.

CONCLUSION

Modular and monoblock splined, tapered titanium stems demonstrated comparable complication rates, functional outcomes, and radiographic parameters for femoral revisions. However, a limited number of patients with grade IIIB or IV femoral bone loss received a monoblock stem. Future investigations are required to determine whether modularity is beneficial for more complex femoral defects.

Observational study of a new modular femoral revision system

BACKGROUND

The uncemented Arcos^TM Modular Femoral Revision System (ARCOS) is a new comprehensive, press-fit revision design. The modular design offers a wide range of possible combinations to accommodate different variations of anatomy and bone stock. The ARCOS is made by a proximal body and a distal stem. As probably the only ones worldwide we predominantly use a combination of body and stem which supports proximal fixation and load, since this mimics the concept of the primary total hip arthroplasty with proximal weight-bearing, leading to bone stock preservation and no stress shielding or thigh pain.

AIM

To evaluate the early results after femoral revision in a consecutive series of patients undergoing surgery over 3 years.

METHODS

We included 116 patients in the study. They were operated in the period August 2011 to December 2014 and we got a clinical mean observation time of 4 (0.5-6) years. Clinical and radiographical follow-up included present function of the hip assessed by Harris Hip Score, Oxford Hip Score, and EQ5D (measure of health outcome). Of the 116 patients, 17 died in the interim and were consequently included only in the implant survivorship analysis; 46 patients attended the follow-up control.

RESULTS

In total 6 (5%) hips were re-revised due to infection (n = 3), fracture (n = 2) or subsidence (n = 1). No patient was re-revised due to aseptic loosening. The 1-, 2- and 5-year probability of implant survival (95%CI) were 97% (93%-100%), 97% (93%-100%) and 96% (92%-99%), respectively. In this cohort 95 patients received a combination of a proximal broach and a distal curved and slotted stem (BS), aiming for proximal fixation and load bearing; 21 patients received a different combination. When comparing these two groups the BS-group had a 5-year implant survival probability (95%CI) of 97% (93%-100%) compared with the group of other combinations with a 5-year implant survival probability (95%CI) of 90% (78%-100%) (P = 0.3). Our regression analysis showed that periprosthetic fracture as an indication for the ARCOS operation was the only significant negative outcome predictor. The mean Harris Hip Score result (100 points being best) was 83 (range 5-98). The mean Oxford Hip Score result (48 points being best) was 40 (range 19-48).

CONCLUSION

The early results of the ARCOS are promising compared with similar studies. We encourage the use of the BS combination whenever the bone stock proximally is adequate.

Femoral stem modularity

Femoral stem modularity in hip replacement was first developed to connect a ceramic head to the stem, then extended to metal heads using the Morse taper principle. Is it a good thing, or a necessary evil? It contributes to improving lower limb length and lateralization setting, at the cost of fairly rare complications such as dissociation and fretting corrosion, which can exceptionally lead to ARMD (Adverse Reaction to Metal Debris). Modular necks were later recommended, with a double Morse taper: cylindrical for the head junction, and more or less flattened for the stem. Is this one modularity too far? Dual modularity in theory perfectly reproduces the biomechanical parameters of the hip, but is unfortunately associated with fractures and severe corrosion, leading to ARMD and pseudotumor, especially in Cr-Co necks. Moreover, it provides no functional advantage, and no longer has a role outside dysplasia and other femoral deformities. Metaphyseal-diaphyseal modularity is not widespread in primary implants, and is it really necessary? Only one model has been widely studied: S-Rom™ (Depuy®). It features a metaphyseal sleeve adapting to the anatomy of the proximal femur, with a stem fitted via an inverse Morse taper. Its only interest is in case of congenital dislocation; like all metal connections, it incurs a risk of fracture and corrosion. On the other hand, modularity is widely employed in revision implants. Does it really help these procedures? The connection between a proximal femoral component of variable geometry and a diaphyseal stem with press-fit distal fixation provides a real solution to problems of length, lateralization and anteversion. Early models encountered high rates of fracture, but current implants and rigorous surgical technique have reduced this risk. Corrosion is a less serious problem, as the Morse taper undergoes only axial stress, without the friction undergone by other models subject to varus stress.

Distal non-traumatic fracture of the cementless MP stem: A case report and review of previous reported cases

Modular hip stems offer many advantages in revision arthroplasty. However, the region of modularity is prone to failure. Fracture of the non-cemented fluted tapered titanium Modular Prosthesis (MP) stem is relatively rare. We present here a case of a distal non-traumatic fracture of the MP stem and review the previously reported cases. A 53-years old, relatively active, male patient with a body mass index (BMI) of 37 kg/m² had a fracture of the non-cemented MP stem on the left side after five years without complaints. The BMI was 45 at the time of implantation of the MP stem. His weight was significantly reduced, but the stem failed and fractured at an atypical site, quite distal to the modular junction. The broken stem with a relatively small diameter had been exchanged to a larger one. Fracture of the non-cemented fluted proximally-modular distally-tapered titanium MP stem might occur after years. Even in cases of good bone quality of the proximal femur, patient BMI and activity level should be considered when selecting the stem diameter. Furthermore, proximal bone loss of the femur should be considered as a potential cause of failure.

Clinical outcomes and survival rate of cementless modular distal fixation femoral stem for revision hip arthroplasty: A minimum 6-year follow-up

PURPOSE

Revision hip arthroplasty is a very challenging procedure. Use of a modular distal fixation stem is one of the available options for revision arthroplasty in patients with proximal femoral bone deficiency. The purpose of this study was to evaluate mid- to long-term outcomes of cementless modular distal fixation femoral stem implantation in revision hip surgery.

METHODS

Clinical and radiological findings, complications, and stem survival rate were analyzed for 46 patients (48 hips) who underwent revision hip arthroplasty using a cementless modular distal fixation femoral stem. The mean patient age was 58.8 years (range 31-82 years) and the mean follow-up period was 95 months (72-122 months). The preoperative diagnoses were aseptic loosening (36 hips), infection (4 hips), ceramic fracture (4 hips), and femoral periprosthetic fracture (4 hips).

RESULTS

The mean Harris hip score improved from 56.6 preoperatively to 88.2 postoperatively at the last follow-up. All hips showed stable osteointegration and firm fixation. Complications involved four hips (8.3%); there was one case each of periprosthetic fracture, delayed union of osteotomy site, femoral perforation, and infection. One stem re-revision was performed for deep infection of the femoral side. The Kaplan-Meier survival rate was 97.6% at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Revision hip arthroplasty using a cementless modular distal fixation femoral stem showed satisfactory initial firm fixation and mid- to long-term survival rate. Complications can be minimized by careful surgical planning and meticulous procedure.

Midterm results of the cylindrical fully porous-coated uncemented femoral stem in revision patients with Paprosky I-IIIA femoral defects

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to analyze the survival of the Echelon® femoral stems in revision hip surgeries in patients with Paprosky I-IIIA femoral defects.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-six patients (70 hips) who underwent revision hip surgery with at least 3 years of follow-up data were included in the study between 2000 and 2013. The mean patient age was 64.5 (32-83) years, and the mean follow-up period was 93 (45-206) months. The reasons for revision were aseptic loosening in 55 (78.6%) patients, periprosthetic joint infection in 9 (12.9%) patients, periprosthetic fracture in 4 (5.7%) patients, and stem fracture in 2 (2.9%) patients. The preoperative and postoperative follow-up X-rays and functional scores were evaluated.

RESULTS

Five patients died in an average of 70 (45-86) months after surgery due to non-related diseases. We encountered sciatic nerve palsy in two patients and early hip dislocation in two patients, whereas 54 patients were able to walk without any assistive device. The remaining 12 patients required an assistive device to walk. The mean Harris hip score significantly increased from 34 (7-63) preoperatively to 72 (43-96) postoperatively. Aseptic loosening was observed in one patient. The survival of the porous-coated anatomical uncemented femoral stem was 98.4% over 10 years.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that good clinical outcomes and survival can be obtained when using porous-coated anatomical uncemented femoral stems.

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of total hip replacement with a 3-part metaphyseal osseointegrated titanium alloy stem enhanced with low plasticity burnishing: a mean 5-year follow-up study

Background

This study evaluates midterm results of a 3-part titanium alloy stem with metaphyseal fixation and a neck-metaphyseal taper junction strengthened with low plasticity burnishing (LPB). Our hypothesis is that this multimodular implant with LPB succeeds in offering the advantages of three-part modularity without junctional failure.

Methods

Twenty-eight of 32 complex primary (n = 9) and revision (n = 9) total hip arthroplasties were accounted for with minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical and radiographic data were reviewed at a mean follow-up period of 60 months. One stem, removed for failure to osseointegrate, was submitted for sectioning and taper examination.

Results

There were no modular junction failures despite body mass indices of 20 to 40 and offsets of 34 to 47 mms. Implant survival was 96.3%, with one removal due to aseptic loosening in a patient with chronic renal failure. Taper analyses of the removed implant showed minimal damage. Preoperative and postoperative Harris Hip Scores and Oxford Hip Scores were 20 to 86 and 16 to 41, respectively. Patient satisfaction was 9.7/10. Radiographs showed stem subsidence >2 mm and radiolucencies around the metaphyseal cone only in the hip requiring implant removal.

Conclusions

This 3-part titanium alloy modular stem with LPB of the neck-metaphyseal taper junction showed good functional and radiographic results at a mean 5 years without junctional failures. Although this follow-up exceeds previously published reports, longer follow-up will be important to confirm our confidence in the additional strengthening provided by LPB.

Anchoring of a Kinked Uncemented Femoral Stem after Preparation with a Straight or a Kinked Reamer

Objective

To investigate a stem‐adjusted preparation of the femur with a kinked reamer and to determine whether this approach results in higher primary stability of a kinked stem than straight reaming of the intramedullary canal.

Methods

Ten cementless stems with a kinked design were implanted in synthetic femurs after preparation of the femoral canal with 2 different reamer designs (straight reaming [SR] group vs kinked reaming [KR] group). The specimens were analyzed using CT to determine the anchoring length and examined with a mechanical testing system to establish their axial stiffness, torsional stiffness, and migration distance after 10 000 gait cycles.

Results

The stem migration distances did not differ significantly between the groups (SR group 0.51 ± 0.16 mm vs KR group 0.36 ± 0.03 mm, P = 0.095). Only for the SR group, a correlation was found between the completely conical anchorage length and absolute stem migration (P < 0.05, R = 0.89). Regarding the torsional stiffness, no differences were observed between the study groups (SR group 6.48 ± 0.17 Nm/° vs KR group 6.52 ± 0.25 Nm/°, P = 0.398). In the KR group, significantly higher axial stiffness values were measured than in the SR group (SR group 1.68 ± 0.14 kN/mm vs KR group 2.09 ± 0.13 kN/mm, P = 0.008).

Conclusions

The implantation of a kinked stem after kinked conical intramedullary preparation of the proximal femur showed equivalent results regarding anchoring length, stem migration, and torsional stiffness to those for straight conical reaming. The specimens with kinked reaming showed significantly higher axial stiffness values.

Cementation of a monoblock dual mobility bearing in a newly implanted porous revision acetabular component in patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty

Background

The most common indications for revision total hip arthroplasty are instability/dislocation and mechanical loosening. Efforts to address this have included the use of dual mobility (DM) articulations. The aim of this study is to report on the use of cemented DM cups in complex acetabular revision total hip arthroplasty cases with a high risk of recurrent instability.

Methods

A multicenter, retrospective study was conducted. Patients who received a novel acetabular construct consisting of a monoblock DM cup cemented into a fully porous metal shell were included. Outcome data included 90-day complications and readmissions, revision for any reason, and Harris Hip Scores.

Results

Thirty-eight hips in 38 patients were included for this study. At a median follow-up of 215.5 days (range 6-783), the Harris Hip Score improved from a mean of 50 ± 12.2 to 78 ± 11.2 (P < .001). One (2.6%) patient experienced a dislocation on postoperative day 1, and was closed reduced with no further complications. There was 1 (2.6%) reoperation for periprosthetic joint infection treated with a 2-stage exchange.

Conclusions

In this complex series of patients, cementation of a monoblock DM cup into a newly implanted fully porous revision shell reliably provided solid fixation with a low risk of dislocation at short-term follow-up. Although longer term follow-up is needed, utilization of this novel construct should be considered in patients at high risk for instability.

Femoral Bone Remodeling in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with Use of Modular Compared with Monoblock Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems: The Role of Stem Length and Stiffness

BACKGROUND

To our knowledge, no previous studies have compared periprosthetic bone remodeling around monoblock versus modular tapered fluted titanium stems with different stem length and thickness.

METHODS

A retrospective comparative study was performed on 139 consecutive total hip arthroplasties (THAs) revised with a tapered fluted modular titanium stem and 114 consecutive THAs revised with a tapered fluted monoblock titanium stem. The latest follow-up radiographs were compared with immediate postoperative radiographs to assess bone restoration in residual osteolytic areas, femoral stress-shielding, spot-welds, and radiolucent lines. Diameter and medullary canal filling of the 2 stems were measured.

RESULTS

More patients in the monoblock group demonstrated osseous restoration than in the modular group (p = 0.009), and the modular stem exerted more severe stress-shielding on the femur (p < 0.001). Stem tip spot-welds developed in 88.5% of modular stems compared with 47.4% of the monoblock stems (p < 0.001). Spot-welds developed in 38.8% of modular stems at the modular junction. Partial or circumferential radiolucent lines were observed at the proximal segment of 30.9% of modular stems, compared with 14.0% of monoblock stems (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the longer and thinner monoblock stems, modular stems had less proximal osseous restoration in residual osteolytic areas and more severe femoral stress-shielding, stem tip spot-welds, and radiolucent lines around the stems, which were stiffer and had a shorter distal section. The stem diameter and stiffness (which were influenced by stem length, curvature, and modularity) determined bone remodeling patterns.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Mid-term outcomes of titanium modular neck femoral stems in revision total hip arthroplasty

Background

Modular stems have been widely studied as they allow intraoperative adjustments (offset, anteversion, limb length) to better restore hip biomechanics. Many authors reported outcomes of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) using modular stems with metaphyseal-diaphyseal junctions, however, little is known about modular neck femoral stems (MNFS) with metaphyseal-epiphyseal junctions. We therefore aimed to report outcomes and implant survival of a MNFS in a consecutive series of revision THA at a minimum follow-up of 5 years.

Methods

We reviewed a consecutive series of 28 revision THAs performed between February 2010 and March 2012 using an uncemented MNFS. The final study cohort included 25 patients living with their original components, at a mean follow-up of 68.4±7.4 months and aged 67.7±11.6 years at index operation.

Results

The Harris Hip Score (HHS) improved from 39.1±19.2 pre-operatively to 78.1±18.3 post-operatively, and the Postel Merle d'Aubigné score (PMA) improved from 9.8±3.0 pre-operatively to 14.8±2.8 post-operatively. The postoperative limb length discrepancy (LLD) was >10 mm in 18% of the hips. There were no significant differences of femoral offset and neck shaft angle (NSA) between operated and contralateral hips. Two hips (8.0%) showed new periprosthetic radiolucent lines. Periprosthetic fractures (PPF) occurred in 3 hips (12%). No subluxations, dislocations or implant breakages were reported. One revision (3.6%) was performed with retrieval of the revision stem for infection. The Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival at 5 years, using stem revision as endpoint, was 96.0%.

Conclusions

The Optimal^® MNFS provided a satisfactory survival and clinical outcomes at 5 years, with no noticeable adverse effects resulting from the additional modular junction.

Comparative Study on the Application of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Combined with Tricalcium Phosphate Scaffold into Femoral Bone Defects

This prospective study sought to evaluate the healing quality of implanted ultraporous β-tricalcium phosphate sown with expanded autologous mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) into femoral defects during revision hip arthroplasty. A total of 37 osseous defects in 37 patients were treated and evaluated concerning bone regeneration. Nineteen subjects received β-tricalcium phosphate graft material serving as a carrier of expanded autologous MSCs (the trial group A), nine subjects received β-tricalcium phosphate graft material only (the study group B) and nine subjects received cancellous allografts only (the control group C). Clinical and radiographic evaluations were scheduled at 6 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months post-operatively, and performed at the most recent visit as well. All observed complications were recorded during follow-up to assess the use of an ultraporous β-tricalcium phosphate synthetic graft material combined with expanded MSCs in bone defect repair. The resulting data from participants with accomplished follow-up were processed and statistically evaluated with a Freeman–Halton modification of the Fischer’s exact test, a P < 0.05 value was considered to be significant. Whereas no significant difference was observed between the trial group A with β-tricalcium phosphate synthetic graft material serving as a carrier of expanded autologous MSCs and control group C with cancellous impaction allografting in terms of the bone defect healing, significant differences were documented between the study group B with β-tricalcium phosphate graft material only and control group C. Regarding adverse effects, six serious events were recorded during the clinical trial with no causal relationship to the cell product. β-tricalcium phosphate synthetic graft material serving as a carrier of expanded autologous MSCs appears safe and promotes the healing of bone defects in a jeopardized and/or impaired microenvironment. This clinical trial was registered at the EU Clinical Trials Register before patient recruitment (Registration number: EudraCT number 2012-005599-33; Date of registration: 2013-02-04).

Increase in Benign Squeaking Rate at Five-Year Follow-Up: Results of a Large Diameter Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearing in Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Squeaking is an on-going complication with a variable incidence of 0.5%-20.7%. The mechanism of squeaking has not been understood completely and is most likely multifactorial in nature. Previously, we have reported on a squeaking rate of 7.3% at 2 years. Our current results show a substantial increase in the squeaking incidence from 7.3% to 17.4% with the DeltaMotion articulation at the 5-year follow-up.

METHODS

Two hundred six total hip arthroplasties with a large ceramic-on-ceramic bearing were performed on 195 patients by 2 senior authors. The minimum duration of follow-up was 5 years (range 5-6.2).

RESULTS

The mean Harris Hip Score remained stable at 91.7 at 5 years compared to 92 after 2 years. However, we observed an increase in the squeaking rate from 7.3% after 2 years to 17.4% after 5 years. As in previous studies, we did not find significant differences between the silent and squeaking group in relation to age, height, weight, and femoral head diameter. In contrast, others reported no significant differences regarding range of motion and gender between the silent and the squeaking hip group at 2 years of follow-up, whereas at 5 years, the squeaking group showed a significantly higher combined range of motion and a higher relative risk of squeaking in women compared to the silent group.

CONCLUSION

While large diameter ceramic bearings may produce squeaking, especially in female patients, our mid-term clinical results of a large ceramic-on-ceramic bearing in total hip arthroplasty are encouraging. Nevertheless, long-term follow-up is recommended.

What Is the Difference Between Modular and Nonmodular Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Both modular and nonmodular tapered fluted titanium stems are used in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA), with follow-up showing good results for both stems. We aimed to determine whether there were any differences in clinical outcomes, survivorship, or frequency of complications.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 160 consecutive THAs (153 patients) revised with a tapered fluted modular titanium stem from 2002 to 2014 and 129 consecutive THAs (128 patients) revised with a tapered fluted nonmodular titanium stem between 2008 and 2014 was conducted. The patient's level of satisfaction, clinical assessment, and complications were examined. A Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed with the endpoint defined as any reoperation due to septic/aseptic complications.

RESULTS

Mean duration of follow-up was longer in the modular group (6.3 years) than the nonmodular group (5.0 years; P = .003). No significant group differences were found in the postoperative Harris Hip Score, the level of overall satisfaction, the 8-year cumulative survival, the rate of infection, dislocation, or postoperative periprosthetic fractures. However, intraoperative fractures occurred significantly more frequently in the modular group (16.9%) than in the nonmodular group (7.0%; P = .011), and stem subsidence was significantly less in the modular group (0.95 mm) than in the nonmodular group (1.93 mm; P = .001). Two mechanical failures associated with the modular design occurred in the modular group.

CONCLUSION

Both modular and nonmodular tapered fluted titanium stems provide satisfactory midterm results in revision THA. Although tapered fluted modular stems are gaining in popularity in revision THA, tapered fluted nonmodular stems should not be disregarded as a viable alternative, especially for relatively straightforward cases.

Outcomes using wedge stem with full hydroxiapatite coverage with a minimum of 5 years' follow-up

INTRODUCTION

Total Hip Arthroplsty (THA) using uncemented stems is a popular practice in the last decades. The implant survivorship is crtitical and a less than 10% revision at 10 years is been propesed for commercialization and use.

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the clinicoradiological results of an uncemented hydroxiapatite covered wedge stem with a 5 years minimum follow up.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Prospective study, patients aged from 21-75years were included. All patients received an Element stem (Exactech) and uncemented cup with crosslink poly and 32 mm metal head, and posterior approach with piriformis retention was used. Scheduled clinical and radiographic evaluation at 3 weeks, 3-6 month, year and subsequent years using Harris Hip Score and Merle d'Aubigné Postel. Intraoperative and during follow up complications were recorded.

RESULTS

One hundred and fourteen total hip replacements in 104 patients: 54 females and 50 males (52%/48%). Follow-up of 5.7 years (range, 5-6.2years). Average age 56.8years (range, 42-75years). Clinical evaluation the Merle d'Aubigné score improved 6.8 points and from the initianl Harris Hip Score 47.3 to 93.1 points at last follow up. Radiographic evaluation shows osteointegration in all stems. And in 6 cases (5.3% at 3 months subsidence was detected, average 1.4 mm (range 0-2.6 mm) with no clinical manifestation, 3 cases of subsidence were associated to intraoperative fractures (1 greater trochanter and 2 in the calcar area, all resolved with wire cerclaje). Subjective evaluation: 86 cases (82.6%) excellent, 9 patients (8.6%) good, 6 cases (5.9%) satisfactory and 3 cases (2.9%) poor. All poor results linked to the intraoperative complications. No patient lost during follow up period. No femoral pain dislocation or aseptic or loosening detected. All implants were in situ at last follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

The radiological results confirm the benefits of this type of stem with good osteointegration. The clinical and subjective results are promising. With good surgical technical and without complications the risk of aseptic loosening should be absent or minimal.

Cementless, modular, distally fixed stem in hip revision arthroplasty: a single-center study of 132 consecutive hips

PURPOSE

The use of cementless, modular, distally fixed stem in hip revision arthroplasty has increased during the last decades. We aimed to analyze the early and late postoperative complications, re-operation rate, and survival rate of the MP stem operated at our county hospital with relatively limited caseload.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we included 132 hips operated with MP stem between January 2007-2014. An independent observer reviewed patients' medical records in July 2015 (18-102 months postoperatively, median 52.5) to collect the following data: age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, body mass index, indication of revision, type of operation, early and late complications, re-operation rate, and mortality during study period.

RESULTS

The commonest indication for MP stem operation was aseptic loosening (72%). We found early and late postoperative complications in 29% of cases. The most common complication was prosthetic dislocation (8%), followed by intra-operative peri-prosthetic fracture (5%). The commonest indication for MP re-operation was soft tissue revision for infection (7%) followed by closed reduction for prosthetic dislocation (6%). We found no correlation between the age, sex, ASA class, and type of operation and the re-operation risk. Only one prosthesis was extracted giving a survival rate for 99% for the study period.

CONCLUSION

This study showed good results of the MP prosthesis with reasonable complication and re-operation rates and negligible extraction rate, indicating the good performance of this implant even when used in the setting of a county hospital with limited caseload.

Modular Fluted Tapered Stems in Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Modular fluted tapered stems have become the most commonly employed category of femoral component in revision hip arthroplasty in North America as a result of favorable early results and simplicity of use. Despite wide adoption, the majority of published data are limited to relatively small series with modest follow-up. The goal of the current study was to determine the success rate and factors associated with success, failure, and complications of the use of modular fluted tapered stems in aseptic revision total hip arthroplasties (THAs) in a large patient cohort.

METHODS

We identified 519 aseptic femoral revisions during which a modular fluted tapered stem was utilized. Clinical outcomes, Kaplan-Meier survivorship, radiographic outcomes, and complications were assessed. The mean age at revision arthroplasty was 70 years, the mean body mass index (BMI) was 29 kg/m, and the mean duration of follow-up was 4.5 years (range, 2 to 14 years).

RESULTS

The mean Harris hip score (HHS) improved significantly from 51 points preoperatively to 76 points at 2 years (p < 0.001). This improvement was maintained at the last follow-up evaluation (mean HHS = 75 points). At the time of the most recent follow-up, 16 femoral revisions had been performed: 6 because of aseptic loosening, 4 because of infection, 3 because of instability, 2 because of periprosthetic fracture, and 1 because of stem fracture. The 10-year survivorship was 96% with revision for any reason as the end point and 90% with any reoperation as the end point. Of the patients who were alive and had not undergone revision at the time of final follow-up, 12 had stem subsidence but all but 1 of these stems had stabilized after subsiding. Postoperative complications were noted in 12% of the cases. Repeat revision due to femoral component loosening was not correlated with the preoperative bone-loss category or patient demographic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large series, femoral revision with a modular fluted tapered stem provided a high rate of osseointegration and sustained improvement in clinical scores at the time of the last follow-up. There was also a high rate of successful implant fixation across all categories of preoperative bone loss and an acceptable rate of complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Cortical Strut Allograft Support of Modular Femoral Junctions During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

There is risk of junction failure when using modular femoral stems for revision total hip arthroplasty (THA), especially with loss of bone stock in the proximal femur. Using a cortical strut allograft may provide additional support of a modular femoral construct in revision THA.

METHODS

We reviewed prospectively gathered clinical and radiographic data for 28 revision THAs performed from 2004 to 2014 using cementless modular femoral components with cortical strut allograft applied to supplement proximal femoral bone loss: 5 (18%) were fluted taper designs and 23 (82%) were porous cylindrical designs All the patients had a Paprosky grade IIIA or greater femoral defect. The mean follow-up was 5.4 ± 3.9 years.

RESULTS

The Harris Hip Scores improved from 26 ± 10 points preoperatively to 71 ± 10 points at final follow-up (P < .001). The Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores improved from 45 ± 12 points preoperatively to 76 ± 12 points at final follow-up (P < .001). Eighty-nine percent (25 hips) of all revision or conversion THAs were in place at final follow-up. Three (11%) patients underwent reoperations, 2 for infection and 1 for periprosthetic fracture. There was no statistical significant change in femoral component alignment (P = .161) at final follow-up. Mean subsidence was 1.8 ± 1.3 mm at final follow-up. Femoral diameter increased from initial postoperative imaging to final follow-up imaging by a mean of 9.1 ± 5.1 mm (P < .001) and cortical width increased by a mean of 4.5 ± 2.2 mm (P < .001). Twenty-seven hips (96%) achieved union between the cortical strut allograft and the host femur.

CONCLUSION

The use of a modular femoral stem in a compromised femur with a supplementary cortical strut allgraft is safe and provides satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes.

Revision Hip Arthroplasty Using a Modular, Cementless Femoral Stem: Intermediate-Term Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Modular femoral stem provides flexibility in femoral reconstruction, ensuring improved "fit and fill". However, there are risks of junction failure and corrosion, as well as cost concerns in the use of modular femoral stems.

METHODS

We reviewed prospectively-gathered clinical and radiographic data on revision total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed from 2001-2007 using modular, cementless femoral component performed by the 2 senior authors. Patients with a minimum follow-up of 7 years were included in this study.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients (68 hips) with a median age of 68 ± 14 years (range 40-92 years) at revision THA were included. The median follow-up was 11.0 ± 1.8 years (range 7-14). Harris hip score, femoral stem subsidence, and stem osseointegration were recorded. The Harris hip score improved from an average of 38.1-80.1 (P < .01). Five hips had one or more dislocations. Seven patients underwent reoperations, 3 of which did not involve the stem. Four stems required revision because of infection, recurrent dislocation, or suboptimal implant position. Survival rates for any reasons and revision for femoral stems were 90% and 94%, respectively, at the most recent follow-up. Four stems subsided more than 5 mm, but established stable osseointegration thereafter. Seven nonloose stems (10.2%) demonstrated radiolucent lines in Gruen zones 1 and 7. No complications regarding the modular junction were encountered.

CONCLUSION

Modular, cementless, extensively porous-coated femoral components have demonstrated intermediate-term clinical and radiographic success. Initial distal intramedullary fixation ensures stability, and proximal modularity further maximizes fit and fill.

A systematic review of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures

Aims

The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of Vancouver type B2 and B3 fractures by performing a systematic review of the methods of surgical treatment which have been reported.

Materials and Methods

A systematic search was performed in Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. For inclusion, studies required a minimum of ten patients with a Vancouver type B2 and/or ten patients with a Vancouver type B3 fracture, a minimum mean follow-up of two years and outcomes which were matched to the type of fracture. Studies were also required to report the rate of re-operation as an outcome measure. The protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database.

Results

A total of 22 studies were included based on the eligibility criteria, including 343 B2 fractures and 167 B3 fractures. The mean follow-up ranged from 32 months to 74 months. Of 343 Vancouver B2 fractures, the treatment in 298 (86.8%) involved revision arthroplasty and 45 (12.6%) were treated with internal fixation alone. A total of 37 patients (12.4%) treated with revision arthroplasty and six (13.3%) treated by internal fixation only underwent further re-operation. Of 167 Vancouver B3 fractures, the treatment in 160 (95.8%) involved revision arthroplasty and eight (4.8%) were treated with internal fixation without revision. A total of 23 patients (14.4%) treated with revision arthroplasty and two (28.6%) treated only with internal fixation required re-operation.

Conclusion

A significant proportion, particularly of B2 fractures, were treated without revision of the stem. These were associated with a higher rate of re-operation. The treatment of B3 fractures without revision of the stem resulted in a high rate of re-operation. This demonstrates the importance of careful evaluation and accurate characterisation of the fracture at the time of presentation to ensure the correct management. There is a need for improvement in the reporting of data in case series recording the outcome of the surgical treatment of periprosthetic fractures. We have suggested a minimum dataset to improve the quality of data in studies dealing with these fractures. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B(4 Supple B):17–25.

Very long-term outcomes after endoprosthetic replacement for malignant tumours of bone

AIMS

The aim of this study was to establish what happens to patients in the long term after endoprosthetic replacement for a primary malignant tumour of bone.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database to identify all patients who had undergone an endoprosthetic replacement more than 25 years ago and who were still alive. Their outcomes were investigated with reference to their complications and need for further surgery. A total of 230 patients were identified. Their mean age at diagnosis was 20.7 years (five to 62). The most common diagnosis was osteosarcoma (132). The most common site was the distal femur (102).

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 29.4 years (25 to 43). A total of 610 further operations were undertaken, an average of 2.7 further operations per patient. A total of 42 patients (18%) still had the original prosthesis in place. The risk of amputation was 16% at 30 years (31 patients). Those without infection had a mean of 2.1 further operations (one to nine) while those with infection had a mean of 4.6 further operations (two to 11). The risk of infection persisted throughout the life of the prosthesis with a mean of 1% per year becoming infected. Of the 60 patients who developed an infection, 21 (35%) developed this following the primary procedure at a mean of 50 months, but another 19 developed this within a year of another surgical procedure. The risk of infection after any further surgery was 2.7%. The site with the highest risk of infection was the proximal tibia (43.3%).

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

This study highlights the inevitable need for further surgery following first-generation endoprosthetic reconstruction, although in most cases, limb salvage is maintained. Late complications, especially infection, continue for the lifetime of the implant. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:857-64.

Femoral Component Revision of Total Hip Arthroplasty

Modern primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) is among the most successful operations in medicine. It has been a consistently effective treatment for end-stage osteoarthritis of the hip. With the increasing number of primary THA procedures being performed and the decreasing age of patients undergoing the procedure, there is an inevitable associated increase in revision burden for arthroplasty surgeons. Revision THA is most often indicated for instability, aseptic loosening, osteolysis, infection, periprosthetic fracture, component malposition, and catastrophic implant failure. Understanding the etiology of THA failure is essential for guiding clinical decision making. Femoral component revision presents a complex challenge to the arthroplasty surgeon because of modern implant design as well as bone loss in the proximal femur. Thorough patient evaluation, defect classification, and well-executed surgical reconstruction based on comprehensive preoperative planning may determine the postoperative results. Knowledge of various reconstructive options and the indications for each is necessary to achieve a successful outcome. This article highlights the most common indications for revision after THA and offers recommendations for how to approach revision of the femoral component. Specifically, the authors review preoperative assessment, common classification systems for femoral deficiency, techniques for component extraction, and modalities of femoral component fixation. [Orthopedics. 2016; 39(6):e1129-e1139.].

Tapered vs Cylindrical Stem Fixation in a Model of Femoral Bone Deficiency in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Distal fixation achieved with a tapered stem design has demonstrated favorable clinical results in revision total hip arthroplasty in the setting of severe bone defects. However, stem subsidence is common with this stem design.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to compare the initial fixation stability of a tapered stem design to a fully porous-coated cylindrical stem design in a model of severe femoral bone deficiency.

METHODS

Tapered and cylindrical stems (n = 8) were implanted into a model femur with progressively shorter segments for fixation (9, 6, or 3 cm). The stems were axially loaded, and the force to produce subsidence was recorded.

RESULTS

Average loads to produce 150 μm of displacement with a 3-cm segment were higher for the tapered stem (393 N vs 221 N, P < .01). No difference was observed in the 6- or 9-cm models. Average loads to produce failure (>4-mm subsidence) were also higher for tapered stems with a 3-cm segment (1574 N vs 500 N, P < .0001). A regression analysis determined the minimum segment length of 1.5-2.5 cm to obtain stable fixation with a tapered stem design (R(2) = 0.78, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Tapered stems required higher loads to produce subsidence than cylindrical stems in a revision THA model. Revision tapered stems require a minimum intact segment of 1.5-2.5 cm to obtain adequate initial fixation stability. Revision tapered stems have superior initial fixation stability to cylindrical stems in the setting of severe bone loss.

Comparison of Clinical Efficacy Between Modular Cementless Stem Prostheses and Coated Cementless Long-Stem Prostheses on Bone Defect in Hip Revision Arthroplasty

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the clinical efficacy of modular cementless stem and coated cementless long-stem prostheses in hip revision arthroplasty.

Material/Methods

Sixty-five patients with complete hip revision surgery data during January 2005 to March 2015 were selected from the People’s Hospital of Linyi City and randomly divided into a S-ROM group (implanted with cementless modular stem prostheses, n=32) and a SLR-PLUS group (implanted with cementless coated long-stem prostheses, n=33). Harris score was used to evaluate the hip function of the patients in order to measure the clinical efficacy of the prostheses in total hip arthroplasty. Anteroposterior pelvic radiographs and lateral pelvic radiographs were taken and each patient’s hip arthroplasty condition was recorded. Kaplan-Meier method was applied to compare the cumulative 5-year non-revision rate between the 2 prostheses and log-rank method was used to inspect the statistical data.

Results

The Harris scores of both the S-ROM group and the SLR-PLUS group were significantly higher at 12 months after the operation than those before the operation (both P<0.05). The Harris scores of the patients with type I/II bone defects in the S-ROM group were not significantly different from those of the same types in the SLR-PLUS group at all time points (all P>0.05), while the Harris scores of the patients with type IIIA/IIIB in the S-ROM group were both significantly higher than those of the same types in the SLR-PLUS group at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after the operation (all P<0.05). No significant difference was found in the cumulative 5-year non-revision rate between the type I/II patients in the S-ROM group (92.31%) and the patients of the same types in the SLR-PLUS group (85.71%) (P>0.05). However, the cumulative 5-year non-revision rate of the type IIIA/IIIB patients in the S-ROM group (89.47%) was significantly different from the patients of the same types in the SLR-PLUS group (42.11%) (P<0.05).

Conclusions

The modular stem prostheses in hip revision arthroplasty were clinically more effective in the treatment of type IIIA and IIIB bone defects than the coated long-stem prostheses according to the Harris score and the cumulative 5-year non-revision rate.

Midterm Outcomes of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Modular Revision Hip System

BACKGROUND

The growth in hip arthroplasty surgery has meant a corresponding escalating revision burden with increasing challenges for the orthopaedic surgeon. The purpose of this study was to review clinical outcomes of a modular revision hip system within a single institution.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a cohort of modular revision hip system stems performed in our institution between January 2005 and October 2012 giving a potential minimum follow-up of 2 years. Clinical outcomes data on complications, Oxford Hip Score (OHS, 0-48) and patient satisfaction were collected. Radiographic outcomes including subsidence were assessed. Implant survival was estimated using Kaplan Meier analysis.

RESULTS

115 stems in 106 patients were identified. All cause survival was 82% (95%CIs: 73%-89%) at 6.1 years; survival excluding infection being 99% (95%CIs: 93%-100%). There was a low incidence of subsidence (seven stems) and no peri-prosthetic fractures. Primary cause of re-revision in this series was re-infection with only one re-revision for mechanical failure. Median Oxford Hip Score at mean follow up 4.1 years (2-9) was 40 (14-48) and 93% of patients reported being satisfied with their revision surgery.

CONCLUSION

This study showed good clinical outcomes and survival using a modular revision stem with low mechanical failure and subsidence. Recurrence of infection remains a challenge in revision surgery.

Survivorship and Complications of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Mid-Modular Femoral Stem

We retrospectively reviewed 161 revision THAs with diaphyseal fitting, mid-modular femoral components performed by ten surgeons at two academic medical centers. The average follow-up was 6.1 years. At final follow-up, 4 patients required re-revision for failure of the femoral component; 3 (2%) for aseptic loosening and 1 for mechanical failure of stem in setting of periprosthetic fracture. There were a total of 24 (14.9%) revisions for any reason, with the most common reason being septic failure (10 of 24). To our knowledge, this is the largest reported series of mid-term survivorship and complications of revision THA with mid-modular femoral components. Our results show that these stems have a low rate of aseptic loosening, subsidence, and mechanical failure.

Outcomes of Mixed Femoral Fixation Technique Using Both Cement and Ingrowth in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

The use of a modular femoral stem in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been increasing recently. However, complications such as subsidence, dislocation and stem fracture are still noted, especially in hips with high grade femoral deficiency. We retrospectively studied a consecutive 41 hips (40 patients) that underwent revision THA with allograft reconstruction of the proximal femur in conjunction with hybrid fixation (proximally cemented and distally press-fit) of a modular femoral component. At a mean follow-up of 5.2 years (2 to 8 years), no hips sustained dislocation, subsidence or fracture of the stem in the follow-up period. We provided evidence that this technique may be a good alternative in the management of proximal femoral bone loss during revision THA.

Management of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty: a review

PURPOSE

As the number of total hip arthroplasties (THAs) is increasing, the expected number of periprosthetic femur fractures is also expected to increase. As such, a thorough grasp of the evaluation and management of patients with periprosthetic femur fractures is imperative, and discussed in this review.

METHODS

This review discusses the epidemiology, classification, and management of periprosthetic femur fractures in an evidence-based fashion.

RESULTS

Periprosthetic fracture management starts with assessing stem stability and bone quality. Well-fixed stems require fracture fixation without stem revision, while loose stems require revision THA.

CONCLUSIONS

Periprosthetic femoral fractures after primary total hip arthroplasty are a complex and clinically challenging issue. The treatment must be based on the fracture, the prosthesis, and the patient (Table 1). The Vancouver classification is not only helpful in classifying the fractures, but also in guiding the treatment. In general, well-fixed stems require open reduction and internal fixation, whereas loose stems require revision arthroplasty.