Cementless metaphyseal sleeves used for large tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty

Metaphyseal Fixation Using Cones and Sleeves for Severe Proximal Tibial Bone Loss

BACKGROUND

Tibial bone defects are commonly encountered in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) and can be managed with metaphyseal cones or sleeves. Few studies have directly compared tibial cones and sleeves in rTKA, and none have limited this comparison to the most severe tibial defects. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the outcomes of metaphyseal cones and sleeves for tibial reconstruction in rTKA regarding implant fixation and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on patients undergoing rTKA in which metaphyseal cones or sleeves were utilized for addressing metaphyseal bone loss (34 cones and 18 sleeves). Tibial bone loss was classified according to the Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute bone defect classification, with types 2B and 3 being included. Patient-reported outcomes and postoperative complications were collected, and a radiographic evaluation of osseointegration or loosening was performed.

RESULTS

There were 52 knees included (34 cones, 18 sleeves), with a median follow-up of 41.0 months. All-cause implant survival was 100% at 2 years and 96% (95% confidence interval: 76 to 99%) at 4 years, with 98% of tibial components demonstrating osseointegration at the final follow-up. During follow-up, there were a total 11 revisions, of which 1 sleeve was revised secondary to implant loosening. Tibial sleeves had a higher risk of revision compared to tibial cones (P < .01), and sleeves fixed with a hybrid technique were more likely to need revision than cones fixed by the same method (P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Porous metaphyseal tibial cones and tibial metaphyseal sleeves both performed well at a 41-month median follow-up with no difference in aseptic survivorship between the 2 constructs. Both demonstrate high rates of osseointegration, low rates of aseptic failure, and significant improvement in Knee Society Scores in patients with severe tibial defects in rTKA.

A systematic review of the literature: The use of metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to analyze the indications, complications, survivorship and clinical/functional outcome of metaphyseal sleeves as a treatment option in revision total knee arthroplasty.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A systematic review was made following the PRISMA recommendations on the use of metaphyseal sleeves for revision total knee arthroplasty. We included prospective and retrospective studies published in the last 10 years looking at implant survivorship, clinical and functional outcome with a minimum follow-up of 2 years.

RESULTS

The included studies showed good both functional and clinical outcomes. The overall reoperation rate was 16.2%, with an overall survival rate of 92.2% and aseptic survivorship of 98.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

Metaphyseal sleeves are a good treatment option for this surgery, especially in AORI II or III type bone defects, achieving good intraoperative and primary stability of the implant, with good and rapid osseointegration.

[Translated article] A systematic review of the literature: The use of metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to analyse the indications, complications, survivorship and clinical/functional outcome of metaphyseal sleeves as a treatment option in revision total knee arthroplasty.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A systematic review was made following the PRISMA recommendations on the use of metaphyseal sleeves for revision total knee arthroplasty. We included prospective and retrospective studies published in the last 10 years looking at implant survivorship, clinical and functional outcome with a minimum follow-up of 2 years.

RESULTS

The included studies showed good both functional and clinical outcomes. The overall reoperation rate was 16.2%, with an overall survival rate of 92.2% and aseptic survivorship of 98.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

Metaphyseal sleeves are a good treatment option for this surgery, especially in AORI II or III type bone defects, achieving good intraoperative and primary stability of the implant, with good and rapid osseointegration.

Metaphyseal cones and sleeves are similar in improving short- and mid-term outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty revisions

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review and metanalysis was to assess clinical and radiological outcomes of metaphyseal sleeves and cones and to identify their possible advantages and disadvantages.

METHODS

A comprehensive search from the inception of the databases to March 2021 was performed on Medline, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, Ovid, and Google scholar databases. Coleman Methodology Score was used for quality assessment. Author, year of publication, type of study, level of evidence, sample size, number of patients, number of knees treated, mean age, gender, mean follow-up, clinical outcomes, complications, the reason for revision and, type of prosthesis were extracted for analysis. Clinical studies providing data about patient's outcomes after the primary and Total Knee Arthroplasty revision with the usage of sleeves or cones and a minimum of 2 years of follow-up were included.

RESULTS

The literature search and cross-referencing resulted in a total of 93 articles, but only 30 articles were appropriate for the systematic review. Comparable clinical results were reported between cones and sleeves. The meta-analysis showed a greater incidence of intraoperative fractures in patients treated with sleeves (1.6%, [95% CI 0.7; 3.4] in cones and 4.6%, [95% CI 3.3; 6.4] in sleeves, p = 0.01), while the risk of postoperative fractures (4.3%, [95% CI 2.7; 7] in cones and 2.1%, [95% CI 1.2; 3.5] in sleeves, p = 0.04) and infections (8.5%, [95% CI 6; 12] in cones and 3.7%, [95% CI 2.1; 7.3] in sleeves, p = 0.03) was higher with cones.

CONCLUSION

A higher incidence of intraoperative fracture was reported in patients treated with sleeves, while a higher rate of postoperative fractures and infections was described in patients treated with cones. Nonetheless, complications were reported in both groups.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Bone defect classifications in revision total knee arthroplasty, their reliability and utility: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

There are various classification systems described in the literature for managing bone defects in revision knee arthroplasty (RTKA). We analysed the reliability and usefulness of these classification systems.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) To review and critique the various classification systems proposed for bone loss in RTKA. (2) Among all the proposed classifications which one is the most commonly used by surgeons to report their results. (3) What is the reliability of various bone defect classification systems for RTKA. In this review, we have assessed the studies validating those classifications with a detailed description of the limitations and the proposed modifications.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Pubmed/Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane databases and Web of Science databases were searched using multiple search terms and MeSH terms where possible. Studies meeting inclusion criteria were assessed for statistical parameters of reliability of a classification system.

RESULTS

We found 16 classification systems for bone defects in RTKA. Six studies were found evaluating a classification system with reporting their reliability parameters. Fifty-four studies were found which classified bone loss using AORI classification in their series. AORI classification is most commonly reported for classifying bone defects. Type T2B and F2B are the most common bone defects in RTKA. The average kappa value for AORI classification for femoral bone loss was 0.38 (0.27-0.50) and 0.76 (0.63-1) for tibial bone loss assessment.

CONCLUSION

None of the available classification systems is reliably established in determining the bone loss and treatment plans in RTKA. Among all, AORI classification is the most widely used system in clinical practice. The reliability of AORI Classification is fair for femoral bone loss and substantial for tibial bone loss.

Cementless Porous-Coated Metaphyseal Sleeves Used for Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Short- to Mid-Term Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

While many studies have presented excellent short-term outcomes of the metaphyseal sleeves used in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA), currently published mid-term results remain limited and some controversial issues remain unresolved. The purpose of this study was to investigate clinical and radiographic mid-term outcomes of the sleeves for the management of metaphyseal bone defects in revision TKAs.

METHODS

From 2015 to 2019, 44 patients (45 knees) who were operated with cementless porous-coated metaphyseal sleeve in revision TKA were included in this study. Bone defects were assessed according to Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute Classification. On the tibial side, there were 37 type II and six type III, and with regards to the femur, 15 were type II, and four were type III. Through reviewing electronic records, data were collected, including baseline demographics, operative details, information of prothesis, and complications. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed, including Knee Society Scores (KSS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), range of motion (ROM), the radiolucent line, level of joint line, and implant survival rate. Statistical analysis was performed by paired t-test for clinical and radiographic indexes.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time was 4.4 ± 1.4 years. During surgery, sleeve-related fractures were encountered in four (8.9%) knees, including incomplete tibial fracture of lateral cortex in one knee and of medial cortex in two knees, and longitudinal femoral metaphyseal fracture in one knee. Unions were achieved in all cases at the final follow-up. Significant improvements in KSS and WOMAC scores were found at the final follow-up, respectively, from 83.8 ± 29.1 to 152.9 ± 31.0 (t = -12.146, p < 0.001) and from 148.4 ± 42.3 to 88.1 ± 52.5 (t = 6.025, p < 0.001). The mean ROM improved from 88.7 ± 31.9° to 113.7 ± 13.7° (t = -5.370, p < 0.001). A 75 mm length of cementless stem was used in all patients and only one patient was identified as tibial end-of-stem pain. No sleeve-related revision occurred, and one patient was diagnosed with early postoperative infection and was treated with irrigation and debridement, polyethylene liner exchange, and appropriate antibiotic treatment. The overall implant survival was 97.8% with the endpoint reoperation and 100% with the endpoint revision. Osseointegration at the bone-sleeve interface was found in all patients and no loosening happened. Satisfactory alignment between 3° varus and 3° valgus was achieved in all but not in three patients.

CONCLUSION

The use of metaphyseal sleeves in the treatment of bone defects in rTKAs can provide stable fixation and significantly improve the clinical scores at the midterm follow-up. In addition, the rare occurrence of end-of-stem pain suggests routine use of cementless stems. Although there are chances of intraoperative fractures, it has no negative effect on outcome when managed properly.

Radiographic and clinical analysis of a Porous-coated metaphyseal cone for revision total Knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiographic and clinical outcomes of a recently introduced metaphyseal cone system for revision TKA.

METHODS

73 revision TKAs in 72 patients were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had a minimum of 2-year clinical follow-up (mean 34.1 months; range 24.0 to 50.3 months). 114 Metaphyseal cones (64 tibial and 50 femoral) of a single manufacturer were implanted. The most common indications for revision were aseptic loosening (56.9%), second stage reimplantation for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI; 26.4%), and instability (12.5%). All femoral and tibial stems were press-fit cementless stems.

RESULTS

Ten of 72 patients underwent re-revision: six for infection (8.3%), two for instability (2.8%), one (1.4%) for patellar tendon rupture and one (1.4%) for femoral component loosening (a cone was not utilized at index revision). Two patients had loose cones (one with an isolated tibial cone and one with both femoral and tibial cones) associated with loose implants but declined re-revision. Aseptic survivorship of our patient cohort free from any re-revision surgery was 95.9% at 2 years (95% CI 87.4-98.7%) and 96.5% of cones demonstrated radiographic evidence of osseointegration. At 2-years, the Knee Society Score (KSS) improved from a mean of 17.2 points preoperatively to 57.8 points (p <.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Porous-coated metaphyseal cones from this manufacturer demonstrate excellent aseptic survivorship and radiographic evidence of osseointegration similar to prior designs when used with cementless stems.

Short-Term Survivorship of 3D-Printed Titanium Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

Background

Several studies have evaluated the outcomes of tantalum cones in revision knee arthroplasty with moderate-to-severe metaphyseal bone defects. However, recent innovations have led to the development of 3-D printed titanium cones to better adapt to host bone, there remains no consensus on their overall performance.

Objective

We therefore performed a systematic review of the literature to examine short-term survivorship and complication rates of their usage in revision TKAs.

Methods

A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A comprehensive search of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was conducted for English articles using various combinations of keywords.

Results

In all, 7 articles met the inclusion criteria. A total of 687 cones were implanted in 557 revision TKAs. The all-cause revision-free survivorship of the implants was 95.3% (26 revisions), and of the cones was 95.5% (31 cones revised) at mean 24 months follow-up. The cones revision-free survivorship from aseptic loosening was 99.7%. The overall complication rate was 19.7% with infection as the most common complications observed and the most frequent reason for revision with an incidence of 10.4% and 4.1%, respectively. Overall, functional outcomes improved as documented by postoperative knee scores.

Conclusion

3-D printed metal cones represent a reliable option in metaphyseal bone defects reconstruction that provides high fixation, good short-term survivorship, and complications rates in line with similar devices. In addition, they are associated with lower intraoperative complications, and higher survivorship from aseptic loosening.

Comparison of Different Strategies in Revision Arthroplasty of the Knee with Severe Bone Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

In revision total knee arthroplasty large bone lesions can jeopardize correct implant orientation and fixation. Different strategies have been proposed to tackle this issue. The purpose of this review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the midterm clinical and survivorship results of porous cones and porous-coated sleeves compared to morselized and structural grafts.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature on the different strategies targeting moderate to large metaphyseal bone defects. The literature was evaluated for methodological quality. We analyzed results on survivorship using logistic regression correcting for follow-up time and number of knees. We compared these results using forest plots for early and midterm follow-up. Clinical outcome was evaluated by comparing standardized mean difference of patient-related outcome measures.

RESULTS

A total of 77 articles analyzing 4,391 knees were included. The logistic regression curve showed a nonsignificant odds ratio (OR) at 10 years of 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.699-1.192, P = .49) for failure comparing all porous implants with all grafting procedures. The available clinical reports show a bigger standardized mean difference increase for tantalum cones (OR 3.04, 95% CI 1.71-4.37) than for porous sleeves (OR 1.72, 95% CI 0.88-2.57).

CONCLUSION

Our analysis shows that the size and quality of the literature on metaphyseal bone defects is progressively improving. Porous implants are effective in tackling metaphyseal bone defects showing good survivorship outcome at midterm follow-up. In younger patients with less constrained prosthetic implants, surgeons might still consider the use of grafts without risking worse outcomes.

Management of bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty: therapeutic options and results

The treatment of small to moderate size defects in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) has yielded good results with various techniques (cement and screws, small metal augments, impaction bone grafting and modular stems). However, the treatment of severe defects remains problematic.

Severe defects have typically been treated with large allograft and metaphyseal sleeves. The use of structural allograft has decreased in recent years due to increased long-term failure rates and the introduction of highly porous metal augments (cones and sleeves).

A systematic review of level IV evidence studies on the outcomes of rTKA metaphyseal sleeves found a 4% rate of septic revision, and a rate of septic loosening of the sleeves of 0.35%. Aseptic re-revision was required in 3% of the cases. The rate of aseptic loosening of the sleeves was 0.7%, and the rate of intraoperative fracture was 3.1%. The mean follow-up was 3.7 years.

Another systematic review of tantalum cones and sleeves found a reoperation rate of 9.7% and a 0.8% rate of aseptic loosening per sleeve. For cones, the reoperation rate was 18.7%, and the rate of aseptic loosening per cone was 1.7%.

The reported survival of metal sleeves was 99.1% at three years, 98.7% at five years and 97.8% at 10 years. The reported survival free of cone revision for aseptic loosening was 100%, and survival free of any cone revision was 98%. Survival free of any revision or reoperation was 90% and 83%, respectively.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:1073-1086. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210007

Assessment of the primary stability of revision tibial trays augmented with a cementless sleeve in AORI Type III defects

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have evaluated the initial stability of uncemented tibial components in revision total knee replacement (rTKR) in the presence of an Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) Type II tibial defect. This study sought to evaluate similar metrics in the severe Type III (AORI TIII) defects with combined uncemented stem and sleeve fixation, specifically, the effect of varying the stem's length and tibial canal engagement upon stability and bone strain.

METHOD

Finite element models generated from the CT scans of 4 tibias with Type III defects were used to investigate the primary stability, in terms of the bone-implant composite peak micromotion (CPM) and microstrains (CPS), achieved after virtual implantations with and without stems.

RESULTS

A stemless rTKR had increased metaphyseal CPM and CPS compared to all stemmed implants. Significant area of the bone supporting the stemless rTKR had CPS greater than bone yield (7000 με). Short engaging stems (≤150 mm construct length), could not achieve reliable engagement in the diaphysis (canal fill ≤ 50%), leading to insufficient reduction of CPS (≥5000 με). Longer engaging stems (170-220 mm construct length), were able to reliably engage the diaphysis (fill ratio ≥ 75%) resulting in CPS ≤ 5000 με. Although, non-engaging stems resulted in increased CPM and CPS compared to engaging stems, long non-engaging stems (170-220 mm construct) appeared to provide additional stability to the rTKR compared to stemless rTKR.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate a likely correlation between uncemented stem engagement and metaphyseal CPS in Type III defects. Excessive strain within the supporting metaphyseal bone is likely to lead to rTKR migration and loosening.

Tibial tray cementation is not necessary for knee revision with titanium metaphyseal sleeves: a mid-term prospective study in AORI 2B defects

PURPOSE

Metaphyseal fixation with porous titanium sleeves in revision knee surgery provides mechanical support to the implant, promotes biological fixation, and has shown satisfactory short- and mid-term results. Cement is commonly used to fix the tibial tray to the epiphyseal area. The objective of this study is to determine whether cement should be used to achieve fixation of the tibial tray with the hypothesis that metaphyseal sleeves would provide enough axial and rotational stability making cementation unnecessary.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Prospective study of 60 patients undergoing knee replacement surgery with metaphyseal sleeves in type 2B defects in femur and tibia. Patients were divided into two groups according to the use of cement on the tibial component. Analysis included the American Knee Society Score (KSS) knee and functional scales, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) index, the Short Form 12 (SF-12) health survey, and radiographic assessment with a maximum follow-up of 5 years.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in any of the parameters assessed.

CONCLUSION

Metaphyseal sleeves showed a 100% survivorship at five years of followup. There were no differences in clinical and radiographic outcomes at five years of follow-up depending on whether or not cement was used for tibial platform fixation. Cementation of the tibial tray would therefore not be required to achieve satisfactory mid-term results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II: prospective cohort study. Therapeutic.

Aseptic Loosening of Porous Metaphyseal Sleeves and Tantalum Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

Bone loss often complicates revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Management of metaphyseal defects varies, with no clearly superior technique. Two commonly utilized options for metaphyseal defect management include porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves and tantalum cones. A systematic review was conducted according to the international Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We combined search terms "Total knee arthroplasty" AND/OR "Sleeve," "Cone" as either keywords or medical subject heading (MeSH) terms in multiple databases according to PRISMA recommendations. All retrieved articles were reviewed and assessed using defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 27 studies (12 sleeves and 15 cones) of revision TKAs were included. In the 12 studies on sleeve implantation in revision TKAs, 1,617 sleeves were implanted in 1,133 revision TKAs in 1,025 patients. The overall rate of reoperation was 110/1,133 (9.7%) and the total rate of aseptic loosening per sleeve was 13/1,617 (0.8%). In the 15 studies on tantalum cone implantation in revision TKAs, 701 cones were implanted into 620 revision TKAs in 612 patients. The overall rate of reoperation was 116/620 (18.7%), and the overall rate of aseptic loosening per cone was 12/701 (1.7%). Rates of aseptic loosening of the two implants were found to be similar, while the rate of reoperation was nearly double in revision TKAs utilizing tantalum cones. Variability in the selected studies and the likely multifactorial nature of failure do not allow for any definitive conclusions to be made. This review elucidates the necessity for additional literature examining revision TKA implants.

3D-printed titanium metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty with cemented and cementless stems

AIMS

Porous metaphyseal cones can be used for fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) and complex TKAs. This metaphyseal fixation has led to some surgeons using shorter cemented stems instead of diaphyseal engaging cementless stems with a potential benefit of ease of obtaining proper alignment without being beholden to the diaphysis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate short term clinical and radiographic outcomes of a series of TKA cases performed using 3D-printed metaphyseal cones.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 86 rTKAs and nine complex primary TKAs, with an average age of 63.2 years (SD 8.2) and BMI of 34.0 kg/m² (SD 8.7), in which metaphyseal cones were used for both femoral and tibial fixation were compared for their knee alignment based on the type of stem used. Overall, 22 knees had cementless stems on both sides, 52 had cemented stems on both sides, and 15 had mixed stems. Postoperative long-standing radiographs were evaluated for coronal and sagittal plane alignment. Adjusted logistic regression models were run to assess malalignment hip-knee-ankle (HKA) alignment beyond ± 3° and sagittal alignment of the tibial and femoral components ± 3° by stem type.

RESULTS

No patients had a revision of a cone due to aseptic loosening; however, two had revision surgery due to infection. In all, 26 (27%) patients had HKA malalignment; nine (9.5%) patients had sagittal plane malalignment, five (5.6%) of the tibia, and four (10.8%) of the femur. After adjusting for age, sex, and BMI, there was a significantly increased risk for malalignment when a cone was used and both the femur and tibia had cementless compared to cemented stems (odds ratio 3.19, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 10.05).

CONCLUSION

Porous 3D-printed cones provide excellent metaphyseal fixation. However, these central cones make the use of offset couplers difficult and may generate malalignment with cementless stems. We found 3.19-times higher odds of malalignment in our TKAs performed with metaphyseal cones and both femoral and tibial cementless stems. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):150-157.

Mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves used in revision total knee arthroplasty

Background

The management of bone defects remains one of the major challenges surgeons are faced with in revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA). Large and uncontained bone defects are traditionally managed with metaphyseal sleeves that facilitate osseointegration and have reported construct stability. While many studies have presented excellent short-term outcomes using metaphyseal sleeves, less is known on their performance in the longer term. The purpose of this study was to present our mid-term results of the metaphyseal sleeves used in patients undergoing RTKA.

Materials and methods

Between January 2007 and January 2015, 30 patients underwent RTKA with the use of a CCKMB prosthesis combined with an osteointegrative sleeve. The main indications for RTKA were instability in 40% of the cases (n = 12), aseptic loosening in 30% (n = 9), infection in 26.7% (n = 8), and “other” in 3.3% (n = 1). The minimal follow-up time was 5 years and the mean follow-up time was 82.4 months (SD = 22.6). Clinical outcomes were assessed by Knee Society scores (KSS), range of motion and rate of re-operation.

Results

The mean Knee Society score increased significantly from 72.1 preoperatively to 90.0 postoperatively (p < 0.001). The cumulative incidence of re-operation in our study was 13.3% (n = 4). Our study reported no cases of aseptic loosening or mobile-bearing spin-out. Knee flexion to 90° and more was impossible in seven cases (23.3%) preoperatively and in one case (3.3%) postoperatively.

Conclusion

Porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves demonstrated excellent rates of survivorship and radiographic ingrowth in the mid-term setting. However, further studies are required to assess their outcomes in the long-term.

Results of Using a "2-in-1" Single-Stage Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Infection with Associated Bone Loss: Prospective 2-Year Follow-Up

Prosthetic joint infections provide a complex challenge for management, owing to their often difficult diagnoses, need for multiple surgeries, and increased technical and financial requirements. The '2 in 1' single-stage approaches have been recently advocated in the field of arthroplasty on account of their reduction in risks, costs, and complications. The aim of our study was to investigate the outcomes of this variant of single-stage revision, which is used in the setting of infection following primary total knee replacement (TKR) and associated bone loss. Prospective data were collected from all patients presenting with an infection following primary TKR over an 8-year period (2009-2017). We examined revision procedures that were undertaken as a single-stage procedure and had bone loss present. Patients were followed-up for evidence of recurrent infection. Functional assessments were conducted using range of motion, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), American Knee Society Score (AKSS), and Short Form-12 (SF-12) survey. Twenty-six patients were included in the analysis, two of whom had previously failed 2 stage revision; another three among them had failed debridement, antibiotics, irrigation, and implant retention procedures. The mean age was 72.5 years, mean body mass index was 33.4, and median American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification was 2. The mean time to revision was 3.5 years (3 months to 12 years). Six patients had actively been discharging sinuses at the time of surgery. Only 4/26 patients possessed no positive microbiological cultures from deep tissue samples or joint aspirates. One patient was afflicted with a recurrence of infection. This patient did not require further surgery and was successfully treated with the help of long-term antibiotic suppression. There were statistically significant improvements in both the pain component of AKSS scores (preoperative 4.3 to postoperative 32.4) and the functional component of AKSS scores (preoperative 10.7 to postoperative 15.7). There was no significant improvement in flexion; however, mean extension (increased from 18.5 to 6.9 postoperative) and total range of motion (increased from 69.2 preoperative to 90.3 postoperative) both showed statistically significant improvements. The use of "2-in-1" single-stage revision can be considered as an effective option for treating infection following TKR and associated bone loss.

Is constraint implant with metaphyseal sleeve a viable option for revision TKR with preoperative coronal plane instability and bone defect?

BACKGROUND

Metaphyseal sleeves have been used as metaphyseal filling implants to address bone loss during revision total knee replacements (TKRs). This study aims to compare the 2-year clinical and radiological outcomes of constraint implant with bone defect and constraint implant without or minimal bone defect in revisions TKR with preoperative coronal plane instability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventeen cases of constraint implants with metaphyseal sleeve matched paired with 34 cases of constrained condylar knee (CCK) prosthesis. Age, gender, body mass index and aetiology for revision surgery were recorded. Clinical outcome measures included Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS), Knee Society Function Score (KSFS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS). Radiological outcome measures included joint line changes, hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), coronal femoral angle (CFA) and coronal tibial angle (CTA).

RESULT

Patients in sleeve group showed significant improvement in KSKS, KSFS and OKS (38 ± 7, 35 ± 6 and 20 ± 2 points, respectively, p < 0.001), while they were 19 ± 3 and 6 ± 2 points for PCS and MCS, respectively (p < 0.001 and p = 0.021). These postoperative scores after surgery were similar between the two groups at 6 months and 2 years. The sleeve provides comparable result in joint line restoration; the postoperative HKA, CFA and CTA were all comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Metaphyseal sleeve with constraint implant is a viable option for revision TKR with preoperative coronal plane instability and significant bone defect. It is able to achieve similar clinical outcomes and joint line restoration compared to CCK prosthesis at 2-year follow-up.

Is stemless implant fixation a valid option in total knee revision arthroplasty - Review of in vitro and in vivo studies

Metaphyseal sleeves have shown an improved fixation in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty (R-TKA) leading to a reduced aspetic loosening rate compared to other stem based fixation options. In the majority of these studies sleeve have been used with stems. Due to that is was not clear how much of this improved fixation could be rated to the sleeve and how much to the additional sleeves. In this review article we analysed the results of sleeve-only obtained in in-vitro or in-vivo studies. In Vitro models showed independent of the set-up a dominant fixation of the sleeve, an additional stem was not adding a lot to the overall fixation. Undersized additional stems showed an increased micromotion and the stem tip, while distal engaging stems showed a proximal stress shielding effect. Very interestingly an increased BMI had not a significant effect on primary fixation of the sleeve. Reduced bone quality on the other hand had and this effect was increased in cases with an increased BMI. In vivo results of sleeve-only patients showed comparable good results to sleeve and stem constructs. In particular on the femoral side the use of an additional stem is required only in a few scenarios. It has to be stated that the numbers of sleeves-only in rotating hinges is too low, to give any recommendation for this high constraint implants. Majority of cases was done with PS and VVC constraint. So far no in vivo data exist on the limitations of sleeve-only in patients with reduced bone quality and increased body weight. In conclusion we can state, that Sleeve-only is an option for R-TKA. In majority of cases the aspetic loosening rate is as low as with additional stems. The borderlines in terms of constraint, bone quality and body weight need to be investigated in future in vivo studies. The in vitro results look so far encouraging.

Porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves and MBT implant for severe bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty: a mean 2.4-year follow-up

Background

Porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves are designed to fill bone loss and facilitate osseo-integration when bone loss occurs during revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this paper was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves for severe bone loss in revision TKA.

Methods

Form December 2014 to March 2018, we retrospectively analyzed 36 patients receiving revision TKAs. They had Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) Type II and III tibial bone loss and were treated with metaphyseal sleeve. The patients were followed up for a mean time of 28.5 months. The Knee Society Score (KSS), the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) Knee Score, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score and the range of motion (ROM), radiographic findings of sleeve osteo-integration were also recorded. The paired t test was used to compare the KSS, the HSS knee score and VAS score before and after the revision TKAs. A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Thirty-six patients had complete clinical and radiographic data. At the final follow-up (mean: 28.5 months), significant improvements in knee range of motion, KSS, HSS score and VAS score were observed postoperatively (P < 0.001 for all). No aseptic implant fixation failure occurred. Radiographic reviews at the final follow-up revealed that components were stable without occurrence of component migration or clinically significant osteolysis.

Conclusions

This short-term retrospective study illustrated that porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves were useful in revision TKA, with a low rate of intraoperative complications, excellent osteo-integration and stable fixation.

Metaphyseal sleeves in arthroplasty of the knee : A suitable tool in management of major metaphyseal bone loss

Background

This study examined the clinical outcome following revision arthroplasty of the knee joint and severe arthrosis with metaphyseal bone defects and instability using metaphyseal sleeves. We analyzed the results based on established scores and recorded the complications occurring on revision arthroplasty.

Material and methods

Patients with revision arthroplasty of the knee and metaphyseal bone defects grade III according to the Anderson Orthopedic Research Institute (AORI) classification were included (16 patients, 9 females and 7 males). In all cases, surgery was performed using an endoprosthesis COMPLETE™ revision knee system with metaphyseal sleeves.

Results

All patients had a significant reduction in pain level after revision surgery. The median HSS score in the cohort with primary arthroplasty was 84 and in the cohort with revision arthroplasty 73 and the KSS was 83 and 55, respectively. According to the HSS an excellent result was achieved by 50% of the patients in the primary arthroplasty group and 25% in the revision group. Only three patients were considered to have an insufficient result. Postoperative pain was significantly reduced in both groups. The median ROM was 112° flexion in the primary arthroplasty group and 95° in the revision group. An extension deficit was observed in three patients and four patients showed prolonged wound healing postoperatively (25%), which was treated conservatively and did not lead to septic changes.

Conclusion

The use of metaphyseal sleeves in patients with bone defects is a suitable instrument with no negative impact on the outcome both in primary and revision arthroplasty. Further studies with larger study groups and analysis of long-term results after use of such endoprosthetic components should be conducted.

Cementless Metaphyseal Sleeve Fixation in Revision Knee Arthroplasty: Our Experience with an Arabic Population at the Midterm

OBJECTIVE

Metaphyseal sleeve (MS) fixation in revision knee arthroplasty (RKA) among Western populations has been reported with very encouraging outcomes. The aim of this study was to report our experience with the use of MS in RKA among an Arabic population. Clinical and radiographic outcomes and implant survivorship were reported at a minimum follow-up of 2 years and a mean follow-up of 4.1 years.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on prospectively collected data of patients who underwent RKA with a MS in combination with a cementless stem (femoral or tibial). Range of motion (ROM) and Knee Society Score (KSS) were obtained pre- and postoperatively. Complications, occurrence of stem-tip pain, and implant survival were documented. Knee radiographs were obtained to evaluate the alignment and osseointegration or loosening of the MS.

RESULTS

A total of 52 sleeves (27 tibial and 25 femoral) implanted in 27 RKAs (27 patients) were included. The mean follow-up period was 4.1 ± 1.8 (2-7.5) years. Postoperatively, the ROM improved from 89.3 ± 9.2 to 106.3 ± 11.4 (p = 0.19) and the KSS also significantly improved, from 102.9 ± 35.6 to 130.2 ± 33.7 (p < 0.001). One patient (3.7%) developed heterotopic ossification, and another one (3.7 %) had a stem-tip pain on the tibial side; both were managed conservatively. One patient (3.7 %) sustained a fracture and required reoperation. None of the sleeves showed progressive radiolucent lines, and none required revision. The aseptic survivorship and overall survivorship at a mean of 4.1 years were 100% and 96.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

MS provided successful midterm outcomes that were maintained in obese patients with different levels of constraint. Our series supports their use as a viable option in RKA.

Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

The increase in the number of revision total knee arthroplasty surgeries has been observed in recent years, worldwide, for several causes. In the United States, a 601% increase in the number of total knee arthroplasties, between 2005 and 2030, is estimated. Among the enormous challenges of this complex surgery, the adequate treatment of bone defects is essential to obtain satisfactory and lasting results. The adequate treatment of bone defects aims to build a stable and lasting support platform for the implantation of the definitive prosthetic components and, if possible, with the reconstruction of bone stock. Concomitantly, it allows the correct alignment of the prosthetic and limb components, as well as restoring the height of the joint interline and, thus, restoring the tension of soft parts and load distribution to the host bone, generating a joint reconstruction with good function, stable, and painless. There are several options for the management of these bone defects, among them: bone cement with or without reinforcement with screws, modular metallic augmentations, impacted bone graft, structural homologous graft and, more recently, metal metaphyseal cones, and metaphyseal sleeves. The objective of the present article was to gather classic information and innovations about the main aspects related to the treatment of bone defects during revision surgeries for total knee arthroplasty.

Excellent two-year survivorship of 3D-printed metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty

AIMS

Metaphyseal fixation during revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is important, but potentially difficult when using historical designs of cone. Material and manufacturing innovations have improved the size and shape of the cones which are available, and simplified the required bone preparation. In a large series, we assessed the implant survivorship, radiological results, and clinical outcomes of new porous 3D-printed titanium metaphyseal cones featuring a reamer-based system.

METHODS

We reviewed 142 revision TKAs in 139 patients using 202 cones (134 tibial, 68 femoral) which were undertaken between 2015 and 2016. A total of 60 involved tibial and femoral cones. Most cones (149 of 202; 74%) were used for Type 2B or 3 bone loss. The mean age of the patients was 66 years (44 to 88), and 76 (55 %) were female. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 34 kg/m² (18 to 60). The patients had a mean of 2.4 (1 to 8) previous operations on the knee, and 68 (48%) had a history of prosthetic infection. The mean follow-up was 2.4 years (2 to 3.6).

RESULTS

Survivorship free of cone revision for aseptic loosening was 100% and survivorship free of any cone revision was 98%. Survivorships free of any revision and any reoperation were 90% and 83%, respectively. Five cones were revised: three for infection, one for periprosthetic fracture, and one for aseptic tibial loosening. Radiologically, three unrevised femoral cones appeared loose in the presence of hinged implants, while the remaining cones appeared stable. All cases of cone loosening occurred in patients with Type 2B or 3 defects. The mean Knee Society score (KSS) improved significantly from 50 (0 to 94) preoperatively to 87 (72 to 94) (p < 0.001). Three intraoperative fractures with cone impaction (two femoral, one tibial) healed uneventfully.

CONCLUSION

Novel 3D-printed titanium cones, with a reamer-based system, yielded excellent early survivorship and few complications in patients with severe bone loss undergoing difficult revision TKA. The diversity of cone options, relative ease of preparation, and outcomes rivalling those of previous designs of cone support their continued use. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(6 Supple A):107-115.

Management of the bone loss by metaphyseal sleeves in primary and revision knee arthroplasty: clinical experience and outcome after forty three cases

AIM OF THE STUDY

Management of metaphyseal bone loss in complex primary and revision TKA is a challenge for surgeons. Out of various types of bony defects, large metaphyseal bone loss (AORI types IIB and III) requires special augments in the form of cones or sleeves. The aim of this study is to assess the reliability of metaphyseal sleeves, in dealing with massive bone defects to provide stability for immediate weight bearing and also to check short to mid-term survivorship of metaphyseal sleeves in Asian population by assessing various parameters and complications.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study that includes 36 patients (43 knees), operated from 2011 to 2019. Patients with AORI type IIB (large metaphyseal bone defect) and AORI type III (metaphyseal defect with compromised collateral ligaments) were included. We included both the primary and revision knee arthroplasties in our study. Our interest in this study was to look for incidence of intra-operative iatrogenic fracture on the one hand, and post-operative complications in the form of peri-prosthetic joint infection and aseptic loosening on the other hand. Knee Society Score (KSS) was used to assess improvement in patient's clinical outcome. SPSS version 23 was used to process data.

RESULTS

The average age of patients in our study was 59.4 (SD 9.78) years. Male to female ratio was 21:15. The average follow-up was 5.42 (SD 2.24) years with the longest follow up of nine years. Metaphyseal sleeves were used in 12 primary TKA and 31 revision TKA. During surgery, iatrogenic fracture of tibial condyle was encountered in three patients (6.9%), all were managed without any intervention and union was achieved in all cases. There was not a single case with aseptic loosening as per radiological criteria in our study. Peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) was encountered in a single case (2.3%). Pre-op Knee Society Score (KSS) was 36.21 (SD 7.43) where as it improved to 92.00 (SD 5.66), six months after surgery. Also the range of flexion was increased from 76.83^o (SD 14.07^o) to 122.91^o (SD 4.84^o).

CONCLUSION

In our study, metaphyseal sleeves showed excellent short to mid-term survivorship in AORI types IIB and III boneloss in Asian population. These results are comparable to various studies conducted on North American and European population. Metaphyseal sleeve is a reliable tool in the armamentarium of the arthroplasty surgeon. It is user friendly implant and provides immediate stability to allow full weight-bearing mobilization.

Femoral revision knee Arthroplasty with Metaphyseal sleeves: the use of a stem is not mandatory of a structural point of view

PURPOSE

Although metaphyseal sleeves are usually used with stems, little is known about the exact contribution/need of the stem for the initial sleeve-bone interface stability, particularly in the femur, if the intramedullary canal is deformed or bowed. The aim of the present study is (1) to determine the contribution of the diaphyseal-stem on sleeve-femur interface stability and (2) to determine experimentally the strain shielding effect on the metaphyseal femur with and without diaphyseal-stem. It is hypothesised that diaphyseal-stem addition increases the sleeve-femur interface stability and the strain-shielding effect on the metaphyseal femur relatively to the stemless condition.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study was developed through a combined experimental and finite-element analysis approach. Five synthetic femurs were used to measure cortex strain (triaxial-rosette-gages) behaviour and implant cortex micromotions (Digital Image Correlation) for three techniques: only femoral-component, stemless-sleeve and stemmed-sleeve. Paired t-tests were performed to evaluate the statistical significance of the difference of cortex strains and micromotions. Finite-element models were developed to assess the cancellous bone strain behaviour and sleeve-bone interface micromotions; these models were validated against the measurements.

RESULTS

Cortex strains are significantly reduced (p < 0.05) on the stemmed-sleeve with a 150 μstrain mean reduction at the medial and lateral distal sides which compares with a 60 μstrain mean reduction (p > 0.05) on the stemless condition. Both techniques presented a mean cancellous bone strain reduction of 700 μstrain (50%) at the distal region and a mean increase of 2500 μstrain (4x) at the sleeve proximal region relative to the model only with the femoral component. Both techniques presented sleeve-bone micromotions amplitude below 50-150 μm, suitable for bone ingrowth.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a supplemental diaphyseal-stem potentiates the risk of cortex bone resorption as compared to the stemless-sleeve condition; however, the stem is not essential for the enhancement of the initial sleeve-bone stability and has minor effect on the cancellous bone strain behaviour. Based on a purely structural point view, it appears that the use of a diaphyseal-femoral-stem with the metaphyseal sleeve is not mandatory in the revision TKA, which is particularly relevant in cases where the use of stems is impracticable.

The metaphyseal sleeve: an unexplored option in the treatment of complex primary knee osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

In an ever-aging society that as a whole has become more affluent, significant emphasis has been accorded to an improved quality of life. Knee osteoarthritis is ever-increasingly treated with total knee arthroplasty. The benefits and satisfaction experienced by those who have undergone total knee replacements (TKR) are well documented in the literature. The issue arises when osteoarthritis of the affected knee is more complex than simple osteoarthritis, i.e. the patient has complex primary osteoarthritis. This collective term encompasses conditions such as massive bone loss, ligamentous laxity, coronal defects and those with contractures. There are various classifications to describe massive bone loss but we utilized the Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) classification. Numerous treatment options are available and we report the use of metaphyseal sleeves as a highly successful treatment option.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all the patients at our centre who underwent primary TKR using the metaphyseal sleeves. Patients were assessed on symptoms and functional status, and radiographs were also taken to assess for osseointegration. Only patients who completed 2 years of follow up were included in our study.

RESULTS

The updated (2011) Knee Society Score (KSS) was used in conjunction with radiological assessments at each follow up. Mean KSS scores improved from 53.83 preoperatively to 193.39 postoperatively. All patients demonstrated increasing osseointegration throughout follow up.

CONCLUSION

The metaphyseal sleeve is an excellent treatment option for complex primary osteoarthritic knees with good results objectively, functionally and radiologically and would be a great choice for all orthopaedic surgeons to include in their armamentarium.

Finite element assessment of metaphyseal sleeves in total knee arthroplasty

This paper investigates the need to use stems in conjunction with cementless metaphyseal sleeves in total knee replacement (TKR) to treat cavity type-3 defects. Finite element models of TKR with type-3 defects of two sizes were modelled with and without stems. The use of sleeves result in stress concentrations at the bone/sleeve interface. The use of stems shows a reduction in these stresses but also an increased risk of bone resorption in the proximal tibia. Based on this investigation the authors recommend that stems are not required in TKR with cementless metaphyseal sleeves.

Are Metaphyseal Sleeves a Viable Option to Treat Bone Defect during Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review

Purpose  Bone loss is a challenging problem during revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Several studies have been published on the use of metaphyseal sleeves during revision TKA. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to summarize the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the use of metaphyseal sleeves in the setting of revision TKA.

Methods  A comprehensive search of PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar was performed, covering the period between January 1, 2000, and August 12, 2017. Various combinations of the following key words were used: “metaphyseal,” “sleeves,” “knee,” and “revision.” A total of 10 studies were included in the present systematic review.

Results  A total of 904 patients with 928 implants were recorded with a mean age of 69 years. They were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 45 months. Overall 1,413 sleeves, 888 in the tibia and 525 in the femur, were implanted. There were 36 septic re-revisions of the prosthetic components (4%). Five sleeves were found loose during septic re-revision; therefore, the rate of septic loosening of the sleeves was 0.35%. An aseptic re-revision of the prosthetic components was performed 27 times (3%). Ten sleeves were found loose during aseptic re-revision; therefore, the rate of aseptic loosening of the sleeves was 0.7%. Intraoperative fractures occurred 44 times (3.1%). Finally, clinical outcome was improved at final follow-up.

Conclusion  Metaphyseal sleeves demonstrate high radiographic signs of osteointegration, low septic loosening rate, low intraoperative fractures rate, and a good-to-excellent clinical outcome. Hence, they are a valid option to treat large metaphyseal bone defect during revision TKA.

Level of Evidence  This is a systematic review of level IV studies.

Are Stems Redundant in Times of Metaphyseal Sleeve Fixation?

BACKGROUND

Various options exist for implant fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty. One of it is direct cementless metaphyseal sleeve fixation with stems, which has shown excellent short-term and midterm results. Stemless fixation of sleeves is another fixation option for the treatment of specific bone defects; however, so far no data in larger series exist. The objective of this study was, therefore, to analyze the midterm (3-6.5 years) results of stemless sleeve fixation in a larger revision total knee arthroplasty series.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 85 patients with 109 stemless sleeves have been assessed with a mean follow-up of 58.2 (36-78) months. An exclusion criterion was uncontained type II and type III defects. Analysis included clinical and radiographic assessment.

RESULTS

The results showed a survival rate of sleeves in 96% of the tibia (27/28) and 100% of the femur (81/81). This results in an overall survival rate of sleeves of 99% (108/109). So far, 10 patients (11.8%) underwent rerevision during the follow-up period. The main reason for failure was infection (4/85; 4.7%). Range of motion, Oxford Knee Score, Knee Society Score, and Functional Score improved significantly. Mechanical leg alignment was within the 3° corridor in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In cases with type I and contained type II defects, sleeves without stems are a promising option, with a survival rate of sleeves of 99% after 5 years. Also, the clinical improvement and reconstruction of leg alignment showed excellent results. In uncontained defects and type III defects, however, we do recommend using stems for additional fixation in the diaphysis. Although the midterm results are very promising, long-term data are needed.

Metaphyseal Fixation Using Highly Porous Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Minimum Two Year Follow Up Study

BACKGROUND

Highly porous metaphyseal cones have been introduced to restore metaphyseal integrity for improved cement interdigitation to achieve durable fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study is to review the survivorship, clinical results, and complications of revision TKA using highly porous 3-dimensionally printed titanium metaphyseal cones.

METHODS

This is a review of 62 revision TKAs using metaphyseal tibial cones, with 15 cases utilizing both tibial and femoral cones. The mean age of the patients was 66 years (range 32-84) who had a mean follow-up of 27 months (range 24-34). There were 38 women and 24 men, who had a mean body mass index of 33 (range 18.3-62).

RESULTS

Revision-free survival of the cones was 90.2%. If infection was excluded, survivorship was 100%. There were no cases of aseptic loosening. The mean Knee Society Score improved from 51 points preoperatively to 80 points at the time of latest follow-up. The mean Knee Society Functional Score improved from 48 points preoperatively to 68 points. A total of 15 of the 62 patients (24%) required additional surgery: 10 (16%) for infection, 3 (5%) for contracture, 1 for patellar subluxation, and 1 for quadriceps tendon rupture.

CONCLUSION

Metaphyseal fixation is important for survivorship in revision TKA which can be challenging due to cancellous and structural bone loss encountered at the time of revision. Prosthetic joint infection continues to be the leading cause of failure in revision TKA. The use of highly porous titanium metaphyseal cones produced from 3-dimensionally printed technology used in this study demonstrated excellent short-term results with no cases of aseptic loosening. Further follow-up is required to determine if these results can be durable over a longer period.

Osteointegrative Sleeves for Metaphyseal Defect Augmentation in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Clinical and Radiological 5-Year Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Cementless metaphyseal implant fixation of revision total knee arthroplasty has encouraging early results. We analyzed midterm results and implant survival of osteointegrative augments in Anderson Orthopedic Research Institute (AORI) type 2a, 2b, and 3 defects. Reasons for implant failure were explored and the potential for anatomic joint line reconstruction evaluated.

METHODS

Sixty-seven consecutive patients (68 revision total knee arthroplasties) received cementless metaphyseal sleeves between 2011 and 2014. The mean follow-up was 5.0 years, mean age was 68.5 years, and mean body mass index was 31.4 kg/m². The clinical and radiographic results were determined using established scoring systems. Additionally, the survival rate was calculated and reasons for failure were analyzed.

RESULTS

In 2 patients (4.3%), sleeves had to be removed early postoperatively for deep infection after second-stage reimplantation. With continuously functioning remaining implants, the aseptic survival rate was 93.6%. Cleared up for initial technical issues due to poor bone quality, it is as high as 98%. The scores remained to be significantly improved by 64.8 points (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) and 25.8 points (Knee Society score) (P < .001). In 10 patients (29.4%), diaphyseal radiolucencies were observed without suspicion of loosening. The mean joint line was noted to be 0.36 mm lower to the anatomic level.

CONCLUSION

At a mean follow-up of 5.0 years, cementless osteointegrative sleeves for metaphyseal fixation in AORI 2a, AORI 2b, and AORI 3 defects yielded continuous implant fixation even in cases with preceding revisions. The cleared up aseptic survival rate was 98% at 5 years. The modular sleeve design allowed joint line reconstruction near the anatomic level.

A review of materials for managing bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty

In 2014-2015, 61,421 total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) were performed in Canada; an increase of about 20% over 2000-2001. Revision total knee arthroplasties (rTKAs) accounted for 6.8% of TKAs performed between 2014 and 2015, and this is estimated to grow another 12% by 2025. rTKAs are typically more complicated than primary TKAs due to the significant loss of femoral and tibial bone stock. The escalating demand and limitations associated with total knee arthroplasty and their revision drives the development of novel treatments. A variety of materials have been utilized to facilitate regeneration of healthy bone around the site of a knee arthroplasty. The selection of these materials is based on the bone defect size and includes bone grafts, graft substitutes and cements. However, all these materials have certain disadvantages such as blood loss, disease transmission (bone grafts), inflammatory response, insufficient mechanical properties (bone graft substitutes) thermal necrosis and stress shielding (bone cement). Recently, the use of metal augments for large bone defects has attracted attention, however they can undergo fretting, corrosion, and stress shielding. All things considered, this review indicates the necessity of developing augments that have structural integrities and biodegradation rates similar to that of human bone. Therefore, the future of bone loss management may lie in fabricating novel bioactive glass augments as they can promote bone healing and implant stability and can degrade with time.

Influence of stems and metaphyseal sleeve on primary stability of cementless revision tibial trays used to reconstruct AORI IIB defects

Metaphyseal augments, such as sleeves, have been introduced to augment the fixation of revision total knee replacement (rTKR) components, and can be used with or without a stem. The effect of sleeve size in combination with stems on the primary stability and load transfer of a rTKR implant in AORI type IIB defects where the defect involves both condyles are poorly understood. The aim of this study was to examine the primary stability of revision tibial tray augmented with a sleeve in an AORI type IIB defect which involves both condyles with loss of cortical and cancellous bone. Finite element models were generated from computed tomography (CT) scans of nine individuals. All the bones used in the study had an AORI type IIB defect. The cohort included eight females (mean weight: 64 kg, height: 1.6 m). Material properties were sampled from CT data and assigned to the FE model. Joint contact forces for level gait, stair descent, and squat were applied. Stemless sleeved implants under various loading conditions were shown to have adequate primary stability in all AORI type IIB defects investigated. Adding a stem only marginally improved the primary stability of the implant but reduced the strain in the metaphysis compared to stemless implants. Once good initial mechanical stability was established with a sleeve, there was no benefit, in terms of primary stability or bone strains, from increasing sleeve size. This study suggests that metaphyseal sleeves, without a stem, can provide the required primary stability required by a rTKR tibial implant, to reconstruct an AORI type IIB defect. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res.

Modular junction fractures in a modern rotating-platform knee arthroplasty system

In this series, we report the findings from four patients who presented with pain and mechanical symptoms after revision total knee arthroplasty with the DePuy Sigma TC3 RP prosthesis. Plain radiographs for each patient demonstrated failure of the femoral component at the modular junction of the femoral prosthesis. Retrieved implants at the time of surgery revealed fractures occurring exclusively at the femoral adapter bolt and the corresponding adapter. Retrieval analysis was performed on two of the four cases by visual light microscopy. Our findings suggest that the implants had suffered from fatigue fractures likely due to cyclic loading. This is the first case series to describe the failure mechanism and clinical scenarios contributing to failure of the femoral locking bolt and adapter sleeve in this prosthesis.

Distribution of Bone Ongrowth in Metaphyseal Sleeves for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrieval Analysis

BACKGROUND

The metaphyseal region of the bone has been recognized by its importance to the overall stability of a revision construct. Porous titanium metaphyseal sleeves to enhance biologic fixation can be used to manage bone loss encountered during revision total knee arthroplasty. While clinical results for metaphyseal sleeves are encouraging, there is little information on the extent to which biologic fixation is achievable with metaphyseal sleeves. We examined retrieved metaphyseal sleeves to determine the amount of bone ongrowth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied 14 tibial and 11 femoral retrieved metaphyseal sleeves from 16 typical arthroplasty patients. Prerevision radiographs were reviewed for the presence of biologic fixation to the sleeves and the stem canal fill ratio. Bone ongrowth was assessed regionally in the anterior, posterior, medial, and lateral areas of the retrieved implants.

RESULTS

Bone ongrowth covered on average 14.7 ± 3.4% of the entire porous surface of the tibial sleeves. The lateral and anterior surfaces had a significantly greater proportion (P < .05) of bone ongrowth compared with the posterior and medial surfaces of the tibial components. Bone ongrowth covered on average 21.3 ± 2.6% of the entire porous surface of the femoral sleeves. No differences were found in the proportion of bone ongrowth among the posterior, medial, lateral, and anterior surfaces of the femoral. No significant association was found between the clinical, demographic, or radiographic factors and the pattern or quantity of bone ongrowth.

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrates that sufficient fixation can be achieved with only limited amounts of bone ongrowth (14.7% in tibial sleeves and 21.3% in femoral sleeves).

Metaphyseal cones and sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty: Two sides of the same coin? Complications, clinical and radiological results-a systematic review of the literature

Revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) is increasing of relevance in orthopaedic surgeon daily practice and this trend is likely to continue in the years ahead. The aim of this systematic review of English literature is to summarize and compare indications, complications, clinical and radiological results of metaphyseal cones and sleeves in management of bone loss in rTKA. Retrospective or prospective studies with at least 1 year of follow-up (FU) were included. The PRISMA 2009 flowchart and checklist were considered to edit the review. Clinical and radiological results, rates of intraoperative fractures, aseptic loosening, periprosthetic joint infection, septic failure, reoperations and re-revisions were extrapolated by the papers. Thirty-seven articles were included in the systematic review. Results of 927 cones (mean FU of 3.6 ± 1.4 years) and 1801 sleeves (mean FU of 4.5 ± 1.6 years) were analysed. The studies showed good clinical and functional outcomes. Cones and sleeves allowed a stable metaphyseal fixation. The aseptic survivorship of the implants was 97.3% in cones group and 97.8% in sleeves group. Metaphyseal cones and sleeves represent a viable option in management of type IIb and III AORI bone defects in aseptic and septic TKAr with overlapping survival rate. Further high-quality long-term studies would better clarify complications, clinical and radiological results of these promising techniques in revision total knee arthroplasty.

[Short-term effectiveness of revision total knee arthroplasty with porous-coated metaphyseal Sleeve and MBT implant]

Objective

To evaluate short-term effectiveness of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with porous-coated metaphyseal Sleeve and MBT implant.

Methods

A clinical data of 23 patients (24 knees) who underwent revision TKA by using porous-coated metaphyseal Sleeve combined with MBT implant between March 2015 and April 2017 was retrospectively analyzed. There were 8 males (8 knees) and 15 females (16 knees). The age ranged from 48 to 85 years (mean, 65.4 years). The cause of revision TKA included infection in 14 knees, aseptic loosening in 8 knees, instability in 1 knee, and stiff knee in 1 knee. Bone defects were classified according to the Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) bone defect classification. The femoral defect was rated as type ⅡA in 5 knees, type ⅡB in 17 knees, and type Ⅲ in 2 knees; the tibial defect was rated as type ⅡA in 2 knees, type ⅡB in 20 knees, and type Ⅲ in 2 knees. The mean time between primary TKA and revision TKA was 30.6 months (range, 6-86 months). The preoperative range of motion (ROM) was (56.0±24.9)°. The preoperative Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) total score was 41.9±14.2; and the pain and function scores were 8.5±5.2 and 33.4±13.5, respectively.

Results

All patients were followed up 12-39 months (mean, 25.6 months). The mean operation time was 2.2 hours (range, 1.6-2.9 hours). The mean intraoperative blood loss was 580 mL (range, 400-1 000 mL). There were 2 knees (8.3%) of intraoperative fracture associated with Sleeve insertion and 1 knee (4.2%) of acute postoperative infection at 25 days after revision TKA. All incisions healed by first intention. No deep venous thrombosis of lower extremity occurred. X-ray film showed that all implants were stable. At last follow-up, slight discomfort after exercise occurred in 4 knees (16.7%); end-of-stem pain in the tibia occurred in 1 knee (4.2%). The ROM was (114.6±5.1)°, which had significant improvement compared with the preoperative result ( t=11.698， P=0.000). The HSS total score (89.0±10.9), pain score (26.9±6.6), and function score (62.1±5.8) also had significant improvement compared with the preoperative results ( t=15.616, P=0.000; t=12.522, P=0.000; t=10.076, P=0.000).

Conclusion

The porous-coated metaphyseal Sleeve combined with MBT implant in revision TKA has a significant improvement in short-term effectiveness and no signs of implant loosening.

Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty and Management

This article reviews the recent updates in revision of total knee arthroplasty (RTKA). We reviewed the recent articles on RTKA in databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, and SCOPUS. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) involves the replacement of all three compartments of the knee in surgery of the knee joint to restore capacity and function. TKA is one of the most common and reliable surgical treatment options for the treatment of knee diseases. However, some patients require revision of TKA (RTKA) after primary TKA for various reasons, including mechanical wear, implant loosening or breakage, malalignment, infection, instability, periprosthetic fracture, and persistent stiffness. Unfortunately, the overall outcome of RTKA is not as satisfactory as for primary TKA due to the uncertainty regarding the actual success rate and the risk factors for failure. Cementation, modular metal augmentation, bone grafting, autologous bone grafting, allogenic bone grafting, impactation bone grafting, structural bone allografting, metaphyseal fixation, using porous titanium coated press fit metaphyseal sleeves and porous tantalum structural cones, and megaprostheses or customized prostheses are the currently available management options for RTKA. However, most of the management systems possess specific complications. Novel approaches should be developed to improve functional capacity, implant survival rates, and quality of life in a cost‐efficient manner.

Septic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Treatment of Metaphyseal Bone Defects Using Metaphyseal Sleeves

BACKGROUND

Bone loss is a severe problem in septic revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA). The use of porous coated metaphyseal sleeves is a promising treatment option for metaphyseal bone defects. The currently published midterm results remain limited and no study has been focused exclusively on septic cases. Our aim was to determine the implant survivorship (with special focus on osseointegration) and the clinical and radiological midterm outcome of metaphyseal sleeve fixation in septic RTKA surgery (minimum follow-up of 2 years).

METHODS

We performed a clinical and radiographic examination of 56 patients with a history of prosthetic joint infection who underwent 2-stage RTKA with the use of porous coated metaphyseal sleeves. These examinations included evaluation of the American Knee Society Score, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, the Short Form (SF-36) Health survey as well as radiographic measurement to determine whether successful osseointegration had been achieved.

RESULTS

Nine patients (16%) had to be re-revised at the time of follow-up (mean, 5.3 years; range, 2-11.2), all due to reinfection. We did not encounter any cases of aseptic loosening. The mean range of motion (92°, SD ± 21°), subjective satisfaction score (7, SD ± 2), American Knee Society Score (76, SD ± 19), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (70, SD ± 20), SF-36 mental component summary (55, SD ± 14), and SF-36 physical component summary (35, SD ± 9) have shown satisfying results.

CONCLUSION

Metaphyseal sleeves have shown very promising midterm results regarding clinical scores, osseointegration, and aseptic loosening. Our results are the first analyzing exclusively septic indications and indicate that they are a reliable fixation option in all bone defect types in septic RTKA patients.

Metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty: Minimum seven-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Metal metaphyseal sleeves are an option for reconstruction as well as enhancing fixation in managing challenging bone defects in revision knee replacement. We report our results of revision knee replacement using metaphyseal sleeves with a minimum of seven years of follow-up.

METHODS

The records of 103 patients (104 knees) who underwent revision knee replacement using metaphyseal sleeves in our centre were evaluated. The follow-up included clinical assessment, functional scores and radiologic assessment.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 74.7 (tange 58-92) years. Mean follow-up was 95.7 (range, 88-115) months. From the original cohort, 15 (14%) patients had died from unrelated causes. During the follow-up period, there were 23 (22.1%) re-revisions. Indications for re-revision was aseptic loosening in seven (6.7%), stiffness in four (3.8%), infection in five (4.8%), instability in three (2.8%) and persistent pain in two (1.9%) patients. For aseptic loosening, the average time for re-revisions was 56.6 months (range 25 to 84). Radiographically, all unrevised sleeves were well-fixed, without any evidence of loosening. Oxford knee score in patients without re-revisions was 28.5 (range four to 48).

CONCLUSION

At mid-term follow-up, metaphyseal sleeves demonstrate durable clinical results and radiographic fixation.

Total knee arthroplasty in patients with multiple hereditary exostoses

We present a case report of a patient with severe valgus deformity of the right knee due to multiple hereditary exostoses (MHEs) treated with total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The surgical management of MHE affecting the knee encompasses exostoses resection, joint deformity rectification, and limb-length discrepancy alignment. On rare occasions, distraction osteogenesis and TKA have been used to correct valgus deformities of the knee. TKA in MHE patients with knee involvement has only been described in 6 cases. Several considerations, such as extensive knowledge of frequently occurring skeletal aberrations, are required to successfully correct the deformities associated with MHE via TKA. This report describes a case of severe valgus knee deformity with a rotational component in MHE managed with TKA, the surgical technique, and future recommendations.

Influence of varying stem and metaphyseal sleeve size on the primary stability of cementless revision tibial trays used to reconstruct AORI IIA defects. A simulation study

Traditionally, diaphyseal stems have been utilized to augment the stability of revision total knee replacement (rTKR) implants. More recently metaphyseal augments, such as sleeves, have been introduced to further augment component fixation. The effect of augments such as stems and sleeves have on the primary stability of a rTKR implant is poorly understood, however it has important implications on the complexity, costs and survivorship of the procedure. Finite element analysis was used to investigate the primary stability and strain distribution of various size stems and sleeves used in conjunction with a cementless revision tibial tray. The model was built from computer tomography images of a single healthy tibia obtained from an 81-year-old patient to which an Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) IIA defect was virtually added. The influences of varying body mass index (BMI) and bone modulus were also investigated. Stemless sleeves were found to provided adequate primary implant stability (average implant micro-motion <50 μm) for the studied defect. Addition of a stem did not enhance the primary stability. Furthermore, this study found that varying BMI and bone modulus had a considerable effect on strain distribution but negligible effect on micro-motion in the sleeve area. In conclusion, the addition of diaphyseal stem to a metaphyseal sleeve had little benefit in enhancing the primary stability of tibial trays augmented when simulating reconstructions of AORI IIA tibial defects. Additional studies are required to determine the relative benefit of the diaphyseal stem when using metaphyseal sleeves defects with more extensive bone loss. © 2018 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:1876-1886, 2018.

Metaphyseal sleeves in total knee arthroplasty revision: complications, clinical and radiological results. A systematic review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Total knee arthroplasty revision (TKAr) is increasing of relevance in orthopaedic surgeon daily practice and will become more and more relevant in the future. The aim of this study is to summarize indications, complications, clinical and radiological mid-term results of metaphyseal sleeves in management of bone defects in TKAr.

METHODS

A systematic review of English literature was performed on Medline. Retrospective or prospective studies with 2 years of follow-up (FU) were included. The PRISMA 2009 flowchart and checklist were considered to edit the review. Rates of intraoperative fractures, aseptic loosening, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), reoperations and re-revisions were extrapolated by the papers.

RESULTS

13 articles with a level of evidence of IV were included in the systematic review. 1079 TKAr (1554 sleeves) with a mean FU of 4.0 ± 1.1 years were analysed. The studies showed good clinical and functional outcomes. Sleeves allowed a stable metaphyseal fixation and osseointegration with an implant and sleeves aseptic survival rate of 97.7 and 99.2%, respectively. The incidence of PJI was 2.7 ± 2.4%. The estimated rate of reoperations and re-revisions were 14.2 ± 9.2 and 7.1 ± 4.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Metaphyseal sleeves represent a viable option in management of types IIb and III AORI bone defects in TKAr. Further high-quality log-term studies would better clarify complications, clinical and radiological results of this promising technique in total knee arthroplasty revision.

Revision total knee arthroplasty with porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves provides radiographic ingrowth and stable fixation

PURPOSE

Porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves are designed to fill bone defects and facilitate osseointegration when bone loss in encountered during revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study is to evaluate short-term results of porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves with regards to implant fixation and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on 50 patients (79 sleeves-49 tibial and 30 femoral) who had a press-fit metaphyseal sleeve with revision TKA. Tibial and femoral bone loss was classified according to the Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) bone defect classification. Post-operative complications of infection, revision surgery, and dislocation were assessed. Follow-up radiographs were evaluated for signs of loosening using the criteria developed by the Knee Society. The median follow-up was 58.8 months (range 25.8-93.0 months).

RESULTS

The bone loss classifications were 1 type 1, 30 type 2a, 2 type 2b, and 17 type 3, and with regards to the femur, 5 were type 1, 8 type 2a, 31 type 2b, and 6 type 3. At final follow-up, 41/45 (91.1%) tibial and 28/29 (96.6%) femoral sleeves showed radiographic evidence of ingrowth. Of these 69 patients, all showed radiographic evidence of bony ingrowth. Three sleeves were revised for infection and two for loosening. The re-operation rate for loosening was 5/74 (6.8%) and for any reason was 14/74 (18.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Modular porous-coated press fit metaphyseal sleeves fill defects and provide evidence of radiographic ingrowth. Short-term stable fixation can be achieved with sleeves, which is helpful as more patients undergo revision total knee arthroplasty with greater bone loss. Longer duration studies are needed to ascertain the survival rate of these implants.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Good clinical and radiographic outcome of cementless metal metaphyseal sleeves in total knee arthroplasty

Background and purpose - The number of revision total knee arthroplasties (TKA) is continuously increasing, leading to a growing need for reliable management of metaphyseal bone loss. We evaluated patients operated with a TKA using metal metaphyseal sleeves for bone defects with a minimum 5-year follow-up. Patients and methods - 37 patients had been operated on. 3 patients died and 3 patients were lost during follow-up. Of the 31 remainders (20 women), 9 had been operated on with a primary TKA and 22 with a revision TKA at the index surgery. The mean age at surgery was 69 (54-89) years and the mean follow-up time was 7.4 (5-12) years. Bone defects were classified according to the Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute classification (tibia: type I n = 9, type II n = 5 and type III n = 17; femur: type I n = 12, type II n = 3 and type III n = 16). Results - At final follow-up one-third experienced an improvement concerning walking aids and walking distance. Except for 1 patient, all had full extension and a mean knee flexion of 110 (90-140) degrees. VAS pain at rest was 13 (SD 25) and on movement 30 (SD 31). 7 patients were reoperated due to: infection (n = 4), periprosthetic fracture (n = 1), skin necrosis (n = 1), and wound rupture (n = 1). The cumulative 5-year survival rate for reoperation was 77% (CI 63-92) and for revision 97% (CI 91-100). At the time of final follow-up, the sleeves showed good osseointegration with no signs of progressive radiolucency or migration. Interpretation - Titanium sleeves are a promising option in managing difficult cases with metaphyseal bone defects in TKA, providing a stable construct with good medium-term radiographic outcome.

Do Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones Improve Outcomes in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

Some authors have advocated for use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones to manage bone defects during revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study is to compare results with porous metaphyseal cones to results with traditional hybrid stem fixation in revision TKA.

METHODS

Forty-nine patients undergoing revision TKA with femoral and/or tibial metaphyseal cones (39 tibial only, 3 femoral only, 7 both) were matched by surgical indication to 49 patients undergoing revision TKA with a traditional hybrid stem (non-cone) technique. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were compared at a minimum of two-year follow-up (mean 3.5 years) with adjustment for baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

Pre-revision bone defects and most baseline demographics were similar between the cone and non-cone cohorts suggesting appropriate matching. Patients in the non-cone cohort had greater pre- to post-operative increases in Knee Society Score (37.2 ± 18.6 vs 28.4 ± 17.8, P = .010) and Knee Society Functional Score (30.4 ± 24.3 vs 13.1 ± 27.6, P = .003). The cohorts did not differ with respect to complications, subsequent reoperation, subsequent revision, patient satisfaction, tibial overhang, the presence of radio-sclerotic lines, cortical hypertrophy around the stems, or tibial subsidence.

CONCLUSION

In this series, metaphyseal cones were not associated with superior outcomes at short-term follow-up. Given the increased cost associated with use of cones compared to traditional techniques, this study cannot support the routine use of metaphyseal cones in revision TKA. Longer-term follow-up will be necessary to determine if construct durability differs over the long term.

Mid-term results for metaphyseal sleeves in revision knee surgery

PURPOSE

Metaphyseal titanium sleeves have been used to provide cementless fixation in challenging bone defects in revision knee arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to evaluate the mid-term results of radiological and clinical outcomes, for metaphyseal sleeves in type 1B and 2 defects of tibia and femur under the hypothesis that they would provide stable and prolonged fixation.

METHODS

One hundred and thirty-four patients were included in a prospective study to evaluate the outcomes of knee revision with sleeves, together with stems and varus-valgus constrained mobile bearing prosthesis. Median follow-up was 71.5 months (range 36-107). Analysis included American Knee Society Score (KSS), Western Ontario and Mcmaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), SF12 Health Survey and radiographic assessment.

RESULTS

All clinical scores improved significantly in all patients during the follow-up. The median of Knee KSS increased from 33 to 78 and functional KSS from 30 to 80. The median of WOMAC pain index changed from 12 to 4; pre-operative median of WOMAC stiffness and WOMAC function score improved from 5 to 2 and from 45 to 14, respectively. The median of physical SF12 varied from 27 to 44, while mental SF-12 from 43 to 54. Radiological evaluation showed optimal osseous integration in all patients, and neither implant migration nor progressive radiolucency around components was observed. Complications included three cases of end-of-stem pain at tibial side and two revisions due to septic loosening in the first post-operative year. No aseptic loosening was reported.

CONCLUSION

The use of metaphyseal sleeves, in combination with uncemented stems and varus-valgus constrained components with rotating platform, has shown excellent mid-term results allowing osseous ingrowth with no evidence of osteolysis or displacement. This is a promising option for better implant fixation in revision TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case series with no comparison group, Level IV.

Porous-Coated Metaphyseal Sleeves for Severe Femoral and Tibial Bone Loss in Revision TKA

BACKGROUND

Metaphyseal bone loss is commonly encountered in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute types 2 and 3 defects generally require some form of metaphyseal fixation or augmentation. This study evaluates the midterm results of stepped, porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves in revision TKA in the setting of severe bone loss.

METHODS

Patients who underwent revision TKA using metaphyseal sleeves from March 2006 to May 2014 at our institution were identified from a prospective research database. Preoperative patient characteristics and operative data were reviewed. Postoperative outcomes were compared with preoperative values. Primary study outcomes included complications, reoperations, radiographic assessment of sleeve osteointegration, and survivorship.

RESULTS

One hundred sixteen knees (108 patients) underwent revision TKA with 152 metaphyseal sleeves (111 tibial and 41 femoral). Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute defect classification included 5 type 2A, 89 type 2B, and 17 type 3 tibial defects; and 3 type 2A, 34 type 2B, and 4 type 3 femoral defects. There were 3 intraoperative fractures (1.9%) associated with sleeve preparation and/or insertion. Six knees (5 patients) were lost to follow-up and 5 patients (6 knees) died before 2 years. Of the remaining 104 knees (98 patients, 134 sleeves), mean follow-up was 5.3 years (range 2-9.6 years). Nineteen knees (16.4%) required reoperation, most commonly for recurrent infection. Only one sleeve demonstrated radiographic evidence of failed osteointegration, but did not require revision. Two sleeves (1.5%) required removal and/or resection for recurrent infection.

CONCLUSION

This large retrospective series illustrates the utility of porous metaphyseal sleeves in revision TKA with a low rate of intraoperative complications, excellent osteointegration, and long-term fixation.

Biomechanical evaluation of tibial bone adaptation after revision total knee arthroplasty: A comparison of different implant systems

The best methods to manage tibial bone defects following total knee arthroplasty remain under debate. Different fixation systems exist to help surgeons reconstruct knee osseous bone loss (such as tantalum cones, cement, modular metal augments, autografts, allografts and porous metaphyseal sleeves) However, the effects of the various solutions on the long-term outcome remain unknown. In the present work, a bone remodeling mathematical model was used to predict bone remodeling after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) revision. Five different types of prostheses were analyzed: one with a straight stem; two with offset stems, with and without supplements; and two with sleeves, with and without stems. Alterations in tibia bone density distribution and implant Von Mises stresses were quantified.

In all cases, the bone density decreased in the proximal epiphysis and medullary channels, and an increase in bone density was predicted in the diaphysis and around stem tips. The highest bone resorption was predicted for the offset prosthesis without the supplement, and the highest bone formation was computed for the straight stem. The highest Von Mises stress was obtained for the straight tibial stem, and the lowest was observed for the stemless metaphyseal sleeves prosthesis.

The computational model predicted different behaviors among the five systems. We were able to demonstrate the importance of choosing an adequate revision system and that in silico models may help surgeons choose patient-specific treatments.

Management of metaphyseal bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty

Background and aim of the work: Revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is usually made more complex by the presence of bone defects, which may be caused by periprosthethic infection, polyethylene wear, implant loosening or fractures. The main aim of the present work is to review the available literature to understand the current options to manage with the bone loss during knee revisions. Methods: Available English literature for bone defects in revision TKAs has been evaluated looking at treatment options and their results in terms of clinical and radiological outcomes and failure rates. Results: Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) classification is the most frequently used because it helps in the choice of the most suitable treatment. Several options are available in the management of metaphyseal bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty. For small and contained defects (AORI type 1) cement with or without screws and auto- or allograft morcellized bone are available. In uncontained but mild defects (AORI type 2A) metal augments should be use while large and uncontained defects (AORI type 2B and 3) are best addressed with structural allograft or metal filling devices (cones and sleeves). Stemmed components, either cemented or cementless, are recommended to reduce the strain at the interface implant-host. Conclusions: The treatment of bone defects in revision TKAs has evolved during the last years providing different options with good results at a short/medium term follow up. With the increasing revision burden, further scientific evidence is requested to identify the best approach for each patient. Long-term clinical outcome as well as implant survival after revision TKA are still sub-optimal and depend upon many factors including cause for revision, surgical approach, type of implants used and various patient factors. (www.actabiomedica.it)