Increased complication rate following conversion total hip arthroplasty after cephalomedullary fixation for intertrochanteric hip fractures: a multi-center study

Kuntscher nail removal: Revision of a failed hip resurfacing above an incarcerated Kuntscher nail. A case report of a smart nail extraction technique through a custom-made instrumentation

Removal of a retained and osseointegrated intramedullary femoral nail can represent a considerable problem, especially in the case of contemporary total hip arthroplasty or, even worse, in the case of revision hip arthroplasty. Usually, complex and invasive surgical techniques are required to remove incarcerated Kuntscher nails. We described a case of an incarcerated Kuntscher nail, inserted 39 years before, in a 75-year-old woman waiting for a revision total hip arthroplasty of a failed metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. A CT-based custom-made extra-long trephine reamer was designed and successfully used to easily extract the nail, leaving the proximal femur before a revision hip arthroplasty.

Conversion Birmingham Hip Resurfacing in Managing Post-traumatic Arthritis With Retained Femoral Hardware: A Case Report

CASE

A 70-year-old man with a year-long history of arthritic pain in his left hip presented to our clinic. He had a left intertrochanteric hip fracture 6 years ago, fixed with an open reduction internal fixation with a cephalomedullary nail. He underwent a conversion Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) with removal of the proximal helicoidal blade and retention of the intramedullary nail. At 7-year follow-up, the patient reported satisfactory clinical outcomes and excellent radiographic fixation.

CONCLUSION

This case highlights using conversion BHR in patients with post-traumatic arthritis with retained femoral hardware as an alternative to conventional total hip arthroplasty.

Dementia and Hip Fractures: A Comprehensive Review of Management Approaches

» The elderly population is the fastest growing demographic, and the number of dementia cases in the United States is expected to double to 10 million by 2050.» Patients with dementia are at 3× higher risk of hip fractures and have higher morbidity and mortality after hip fractures.» Hip fracture patients with dementia benefit from early analgesia and timely surgical fixation of fracture.» Early and intensive inpatient rehabilitation is associated with improved postoperative outcomes in patients with dementia.» Coordination of care within a "orthogeriatric" team decreases mortality, and fracture liaison services show potential for improving long-term outcomes in hip fracture patients with dementia.

Total Hip Arthroplasty After Proximal Femoral Nailing: Preoperative Preparation and Intraoperative Surgical Techniques

The combination of an aging population and increased utilization of total hip arthroplasty (THA) is leading to a higher incidence of conversion THA, defined as conversion from previous hip fracture surgery to THA. Conversion THA is a more technically challenging, time-consuming, and costly procedure compared to primary THA and frequently involve more medically complex patients. Thus, the aim of this review is to provide a rubric for surgeons to use when preparing for a conversion THA. We have assessed the compatibility of commonly available extraction devices with popular femoral nails. Furthermore, we review technical pearls for conversion THA including equipment planning, operative setup, intraoperative imaging, extraction sequencing, and troubleshooting commonly encountered obstacles.

Outcomes After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty from a Specific, Now-recalled Implant System

BACKGROUND

A specific total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implant system was recently recalled for high incidence of early polymeric wear and osteolysis. We analyzed the early outcomes of aseptic revision with these implants.

METHODS

We identified 202 aseptic revision TKAs of this implant system performed at a single institution between 2010 and 2020. Revision indications included aseptic loosening (n=120), instability (n=55), and polymeric wear/osteolysis (n=27). In 145 cases (72%) components were revised and 57 cases (28%) were isolated polyethylene insert exchange. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to determine survivorship free from all-cause re-revision and re-revision risk factors.

RESULTS

At 2 and 5 years, survivorship free from all-cause re-revision was 89 and 76% in the polyethylene exchange cohort versus 92 and 84% in the component revision cohort (P=0.5). At 2 and 5 years, survivorship in revision with components from the same manufacturer was 89 and 80% compared to 95 and 86% in revision with components from a different manufacturer (P=0.2). Among re-revisions (n=30), cones (37%), sleeves (7%), hinge/distal femoral replacement implants were frequently used (13%). Men had increased risk for re-revision (Hazard Ratio=2.3, P=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

In this series of aseptic revision TKAs performed on a now-recalled implant system, survivorship free from re-revision was lower than expected when components from the same manufacturer were utilized, but comparable to contemporary reports when both components were revised with an alternative implant system. Metaphyseal fixation with cones and sleeves as well as highly constrained implants were frequently utilized at time of re-revision TKA.

Conversion hip arthroplasty for failed internal fixation of ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures: a case report

BACKGROUND

Ipsilateral femoral neck and hip fractures are uncommon high energy injuries. In the literature no single method of treatment has emerged as superior to the others. A recent publication has documented the successful application of the rendezvous technique using dual-implants for treating these injuries. However in some cases, this technique may fail and revision surgery is required.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 67-year old man sustained ipsilateral fractures of his femur and femoral neck in a road traffic accident. His injuries were treated by a dual construct consisting of a retrograde femoral nail and dynamic hip screw. Three months after surgery the hip screw cut out of the femoral head necessitating revision to a total hip arthroplasty. Surgery was carried out using a single stage two part procedure on a standard operating table without having to reposition or redrape the patient. There were no postoperative complications and at 1 year from surgery the patient is satisfied with the result and has returned to work.

CONCLUSION

Conversion hip arthroplasty in the presence of dual implants is a technically challenging and unpredictable procedure, with an increased risk of complications. Our surgical approach provides a framework for orthopedic surgeons to safely perform this complex procedure.

Conversion total hip arthroplasty following proximal femur fracture: A retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

The incidence of conversion total hip arthroplasty (cTHA) following reduction and fixation for proximal femur fractures will increase in parallel to the aging population worldwide.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study is to report the frequency of bacterial detection and the outcome of cTHA at the authors' institution and to analyze preoperative factors that correlate with higher rates of bacterial growth and septic revision.

METHODS

48 patients who had been converted to THA after osteosynthesis of a proximal femur fracture either by a one- or two-stage procedure were included. Septic failure rate and the frequency of bacterial detection at the time of fixation device removal were calculated. The influence of different preoperative factors was examined by the odds ratio. A receiver operating characteristic curve of c-reactive protein (CRP) for detection of bacterial growth at the time of fixation device removal was calculated.

RESULTS

18.8% patients showed positive bacterial cultures, with Staph. epidermidis being the most frequent pathogen (33.3%). Septic failure after cTHA occurred in 4.2%. Fixation with cephalomedullary nails and complications with the internal fixation showed higher odds for bacterial growth at time of cTHA. CRP for predicting bacterial growth had an area under the curve of 0.661. Implant survival was worse when temporary spacers were used.

CONCLUSION

Bacterial detection rate at the time of cTHA is high, whereas septic failure rates are low. Isolated evaluation of inflammatory blood markers without other diagnostic modalities for infection is not decisive and does not justify a two-stage approach with implantation of a temporary spacer.

Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Era of Bundled Care Payments: Impacts on Costs of Care

BACKGROUND

Conversion hip arthroplasty is defined as a patient who has had prior open or arthroscopic hip surgery with or without retained hardware that is removed and replaced with arthroplasty components. Currently, it is classified under the same diagnosis-related group as primary total hip arthroplasty (THA); however, it frequently requires a higher cost of care.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 228 conversion THA procedures in an orthopaedic specialty hospital was performed. Propensity score matching was used to compare the study group to a cohort of 510 primary THA patients by age, body mass index, sex, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score. These matched groups were compared based on total costs, implants used, operative times, length of stay (LOS), readmissions, and complications.

RESULTS

Conversion THA incurred 25% more mean total costs compared to primary THA (P < .05), longer lengths of surgery (154 versus 122 minutes), and hospital LOS (2.1 versus 1.56 days). A subgroup analysis showed a 57% increased cost for cephalomedullary nail conversion, 34% increased cost for sliding hip screw, 33% for acetabular open reduction and internal fixation conversion, and 10% increased costs in closed reduction and percutaneous pinning conversions (all P < .05). There were 5 intraoperative complications in the conversion group versus none in the primary THA group (P < .01), with no statistically significant difference in readmissions.

CONCLUSION

Conversion THA is significantly more costly than primary THA and has longer surgical times and greater LOS. Specifically, conversion THA with retained implants had the greatest impact on cost.

Primary repair for concurrent bilateral intertrochanteric fracture and femoral head necrosis with prolonged shank biologic total hip replacement: A case report and surgical techniques

For the treatment of an intertrochanteric fracture combined with femoral head necrosis in middle-age patients, it has been controversial whether to perform fracture reduction and fixation first then total hip replacement, or direct total hip replacement. We present a rare case of 53-year-old male patient suffered from bilateral intertrochanteric fracture caused by a road traffic injury. The patient had a history of femoral head necrosis for eight years, and the Harris score was 30. We performed total hip replacement with prolonged biologic shank prostheses for primary repair. One year after the surgery, nearly full range of motion was achieved without instability (active flexion angle of 110°, extension angle of 20°, adduction angle of 40°, abduction angle of 40°, internal rotation angle of 25°, and external rotation angle of 40°). The Harris score was 85. For the middle-aged patient with unstable intertrochanteric fractures and osteonecrosis of the femoral head, we can choose primary repair for concurrent bilateral intertrochanteric fracture and femoral head necrosis with prolonged shank biologic total hip replacement.

Mortality and Complications Following Early Conversion Arthroplasty for Failed Hip Fracture Surgery

BACKGROUND

Hip fracture in older patients leads to high morbidity and mortality. Patients who are treated surgically but fail acutely face a more complex operation with conversion total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study investigated mortalities and complications in patients who experienced failure within one year following hip fracture surgery requiring conversion THA.

METHODS

Patients aged 60 years or more undergoing conversion THA within one year following intertrochanteric or femoral neck fracture were identified and propensity-matched to patients sustaining hip fractures treated surgically but not requiring conversion within the first year. Patients who had two-year follow-up (91 conversions; 247 comparisons) were analyzed for 6-month, 12-month, and 24-month mortalities, 90-day readmissions, surgical complications, and medical complications.

RESULTS

Nonunion and screw cutout were the most common indications for conversion THA. Mortalities were similar between groups at 6 months (7.7% conversion versus 6.1% nonconversion, P = .774), 12 months (11% conversion versus 12% nonconversion, P = .999), and 24 months (14% conversion versus 22% nonconversion, P = .163). Survivorships were similar between groups for the entire cohort and by fracture type. Conversion THA had a higher rate of 90-day readmissions (14% versus 3.2%, P = .001), and medical complications (17% versus 6.1%, P = .006). Inpatient and 90-day orthopaedic complications were similar.

CONCLUSION

Conversion THA for failed hip fracture surgery had comparable mortality rates to hip fracture surgery, with higher rates of perioperative medical complications and readmissions. Conversion THA following hip fracture represents a potential "second hit" that both surgeons and patients should be aware of with initial decision-making.

Conversion total hip arthroplasty for early failure following unstable intertrochanteric hip fracture: what can patients expect?

PURPOSE

To report surgical outcomes in patients treated with conversion total hip arthroplasty (CTHA) for early failure of cephalomedullary nails (CMNs).

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of CTHA for treatment of failed CMN within 1 year of initial surgery for intertrochanteric (IT) hip fractures. The cohort was matched 1:5 to patients who underwent elective primary THA (PTHA). Patient demographics, mechanism of CMN failure, surgical outcomes, and complication rates were assessed.

RESULTS

22 patients met criteria with a mean time to failure of 145 days. Modes of failure included: lag screw cut-out with superior migration (9, 40.9%), or medialization (8, 36.4%), and aseptic nonunion with implant failure (2, 9.0%) and without implant failure (3, 13.6%). Fourteen of the patients (63.6%) had acetabular-sided damage secondary to lag screw penetration, all in the screw cut-out groups. Patient demographics were similar between cohorts. Compared to PTHA, CTHA patients had increased operative time, blood loss, LOS, and readmission rates. After IMN failure, the operative leg was shorter than the contralateral leg in all cases. CTHA restored leg lengths to <  = 10 mm in 15 (68.1%) of patients, with an average leg length discrepancy after CTHA of 6.7 mm. CTHA patients had increased rates of overall surgical complications and medical complications, specifically anemia (all p < 0.01). Tranexamic acid was used less often in the CTHA group (p < 0.01). Rate of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), dislocation, and revision were all higher in the CTHA, though did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

The majority (77.3%) of CMN implant failure for nonunion within 1 year was due to screw cut-out. CTHA is a salvage option for early failed IT hip fracture repair, but expected surgical outcomes are more similar to revision THA than primary THA, with increased risk of readmission, longer surgery and LOS, increased blood loss, and higher complication rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, Retrospective comparative study.

Functional outcome of conversion total hip arthroplasty (CTHA) using uncemented distally loading femoral stem for failed fixation of proximal femoral nail - A case series

Introduction and aims

There is paucity of prospective studies on conversion total hip arthroplasty (CTHA) for failed proximal femoral nailing. The objective of this study is to evaluate the functional outcome of CTHA using extensively porous coated distal loading stem for failed proximal femoral nailing.

Patients and methods

Fifteen consecutively operated patients for failed proximal femoral nail treated with single stage procedure of nail extraction and CTHA were included in this prospective observational study. All patients received metal-on-polyethylene bearing with uncemented press-fit acetabular cup (Pinnacle cup; DePuy, Warsaw [IN], USA) and extensively porous coated distally loading revision stem (Solution stem; DePuy, Warsaw [IN], USA). All patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at one, three, six and more than twelve months using the Harris Hip Score (HHS). The responsiveness of HHS was assessed using Effect Size (ES) and Standardised Response Mean (SRM). ES and SRM >0.8 indicates adequate responsiveness.

Results

The mean duration of follow-up was 16.9 months for the overall cohort (SD: 7.9; range: 6-28 months). The mean preoperative HHS was 32 ± 6.1, the mean HHS at six months follow-up was 89.7 ± 4.0 and the mean HHS at final follow-up of atleast one year was 93.7 ± 3.0. There was a statistically and clinically significant improvement in the HHS from preoperatively to final follow-up postoperatively (p < 0.0001). At the final follow-up, twelve patients (80%) had an excellent outcome and three patients (20%) had a good outcome as per HHS grading. The ES was 9.87 and the SRM was 8.86 thereby suggesting adequate responsiveness. One patient developed surgical site infection and another patient developed dislocation. Both were successfully treated and subsequently the patients made uneventful recovery. None of the patients required revision surgery.

Conclusion

HHS has adequate responsiveness for assessing the functional outcome of CTHA. We recommend the use of an uncemented cup and uncemented extensively porous coated, distal loading stem for failed PFN fixation in intertrochanteric hip fractures.

Conversion total hip arthroplasty following extracapsular hip fracture fixation with a cephalomedullary device: a comprehensive review

With the annual incidence of hip fractures and hip fracture fixation rising, the need for conversion total hip arthroplasty has also risen. About half of the 280,000 hip fractures that occur annually in the United States are extracapsular. Commonly extracapsular hip fractures are treated with either cephalomedullary nails (CMNs) or sliding hip screws (SHS). More recently, there has been a shift toward increased CMN use due to increased training with this fixation method as well as perioperative and biomechanical benefits. Given this shift, orthopedic surgeons need to understand the factors that lead to CMN failure. Failed CMN treatment leaves both patients and surgeons with few management options including revision fixation with or without osteotomy, conversion total hip arthroplasty, and conversion hemiarthroplasty. Surgeons must consider the patient and injury characteristics before deciding the best treatment plan. Conversion total hip arthroplasty is indicated in younger patients without femoral head and/or acetabular articular injury, degenerative joint disease, or avascular necrosis. Conversion total arthroplasty is a technically demanding and resource-intensive surgery associated with lower success rates and outcomes than primary total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedic surgeons should have thorough understanding of preoperative workup needed prior to surgery, implant selection associated with best outcomes, most common surgical approaches used, intraoperative considerations, and complications associated with conversion total hip arthroplasty. A comprehensive understanding of these concepts gives patients the best chance of having a successful outcome.

The fate of positive intraoperative cultures following conversion total hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

The objectives of this study are to report the rates of positive intraoperative cultures obtained during conversion total hip arthroplasty (THA) according to index surgery, and to describe the natural history of treatment for a consecutive series of patients with unexpected positive intraoperative cultures during conversion THA.

METHODS

We reviewed all patients at 2 institutions undergoing conversion THA from prior open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of acetabular and hip fractures or hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures from 2011 to 2018. Intraoperative cultures were taken in 105 patients. Positive intraoperative cultures during conversion were recorded and managed with an infectious diseases consult. The outcomes including PJI at 90 days and 1 year follow-up were documented.

RESULTS

Overall, 19 of 105 patients (18%) undergoing conversion THA had positive intraoperative cultures, with the highest rates in the hemiarthroplasty 7/16 (44%) and acetabular ORIF 9/48 (19%) groups. All 19 patients were initially treated conservatively: 8 received IV antibiotics, 10 received no additional therapy, and 1 received oral antibiotics. 4/9 acetabular fracture conversions developed PJI at 1 year, with 3 requiring multiple irrigation and debridement/polyethylene exchanges to control the infection while the 4th patient required 2-stage exchange. There were no 1-year PJI from any of the other index procedures after conversion. All 7 hemiarthroplasty patients with positive cultures were treated to resolution with 4-8 weeks IV antibiotics alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing conversion THA from prior hip or acetabular fracture have a high rate of positive intraoperative cultures. As such, all patients undergoing conversion THA from prior hip or acetabular fracture fixation should undergo thorough diagnostic workup prior to surgery, and have intraoperative cultures obtained during surgery if infection remains suspicious. Further work should be performed to develop MSIS criteria for preoperative management of patients undergoing conversion THA.

Fracture and Patient Characteristics Associated With Early Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty After Acetabular Fracture Fixation

OBJECTIVES

To determine risk factors for early conversion total hip arthroplasty (THA) after operative treatment of acetabular fractures.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Level I trauma center.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION

We reviewed 685 operative acetabular fractures at our institution from 2011 to 2017, with a median follow-up of 12 months (range, 4-105 months).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Multivariable regression analysis was performed after univariate analysis to identify independent risk factors for conversion THA. Sensitivity analysis was performed with minimum follow-up set at 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

One hundred eight patients (16%) underwent conversion THA, with 52% of conversions occurring within 1 year, an additional 27% within 2 years, and the remaining 21% within 6 years of the index acetabular open reduction internal fixation. The median time to conversion THA was 11.5 months (range, 0.5-72 months). The risk of conversion THA by fracture pattern was 53 of 196 (27%) for transverse posterior wall (TPW), 12 of 52 (23%) for T shaped, 10 of 68 (15%) for posterior column with posterior wall, and 25 of 207 (12%) for posterior wall. Independent risk factors for early conversion included the following: TPW fracture, protrusio, hip dislocation, increased body mass index, increased age, infection, and dislocation after open reduction internal fixation. Independent risk factors for early conversion THA specific to patients with TPW fractures include only increased age and body mass index. Sensitivity analysis showed no change in results using either 6 or 12-month minimum follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Transverse posterior wall fractures have a high risk of early conversion THA compared with other acetabular fracture patterns, especially when in combination with other significant risk factors. Consideration for different and novel management options warrants further study in this subset of acetabular fracture patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

CT scans better assess lateral wall morphology of "stable appearing" intertrochanteric (IT) femur fractures and predict early failure of sliding hip screw (SHS) fixation

To compare the efficacy of plain x-ray images and computed tomography (CT) to assess the morphology of the lateral wall (LW) component of intertrochanteric (IT) femur fractures and determine predictors of early fixation failure.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Level-one trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

One hundred forty-two adult patients with IT fractures treated with either a sliding hip screw (SHS) or a cephalomedullary nail (CMN) who had both pre-op plain x-ray images and CT scans with at least 6 weeks of follow-up were reviewed.

INTERVENTION

Preoperative CT scan and plain radiographs of the affected hip.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Lateral wall assessment based on plain x-rays versus CT imaging in relation to implant failure.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-two patients met inclusion criteria, 105 patients treated with a CMN, and 37 with a SHS. There was a poor correlation between the assessment of the LW on plain x-ray images and CT scans. Failures in the SHS group were significantly associated with all CT measurements (P < .05) but not with plain film LW assessment (P = .66). Fifteen patients had an early implant failure (6 CMN, 9 SHS). There were no statistically significant associations between any radiographic measurement (plain images and CT) and CMN failures.

CONCLUSIONS

Plain film images are not accurate for assessing lateral wall morphology/integrity and are not predictive of SHS implant failures. Our novel CT measurements were effective at detecting lateral wall patterns at risk for treatment failure with SHS implants.Level of Evidence: Level III.

Septic Dislocation of Hip After Cephalomedullary Nail Fixation of Intertrochanteric Fractures of Femur: A Case Report

CASE

We describe 3 cases of septic hip arthritis with a dislocation after failed, cephalomedullary nail (CMN) fixation following fragility intertrochanteric (IT) hip fractures that were treated with antibiotic spacer placement.

CONCLUSION

Septic hip arthritis and compromised hip abductors can contribute to dislocation of the hip after CMN for IT fractures. This case report presents a treatment plan to address this rare complication, not yet reported after CMN for IT fractures in the literature, to control infection and optimize function.

Preliminary Results of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Subjects at Risk for Dislocation Using a Novel Modular Cementless Dual-Mobility Cup. A Single-Center Prospective Study

Nowadays total hip arthroplasty (THA) is widely considered the operation of the century in orthopedic and traumatological fields. Despite this fact, instability and dislocation after THA are a common reason for revision surgery. The purpose of this prospective study is to evaluate the preliminary clinical and radiological results of a novel dual mobility cup. We evaluated 32 consecutive cases of patients who underwent THA using a novel dual mobility cup—with holes in the cup, a modular metallic inlay and a crosslinked polyethylene. All of them were considered at risk of instability of the implant due to primary or concomitant diagnosis. The preoperative Harris hip score was 54.7 on average. At a minimum 2 years follow-up, the mean HHS raised up to a mean value of 88.4; this improvement was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). None of the patients enrolled in this study sustained a postoperative dislocation at a mean follow-up of 39.6 months. Furthermore, no patients sustained modular liner dissociation or an intraprosthetic dislocation. As such, survivorship free from dislocation was 100% at both 2 and 5 years. This study demonstrates that the modular dual mobility (DM) socket provides dual articulation, larger jump distance, and greater range of motion before impingement, which significantly reduce the rate of dislocation.

Preoperative Risk Prediction Models for Short-Term Revision and Death After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Data from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register

Because of the increasing number of total hip arthroplasties (THAs), even a small proportion of complications after the operation can lead to substantial individual difficulties and health-care costs. The aim of this study was to develop simple-to-use risk prediction models to assess the risk of the most common reasons for implant failure to facilitate clinical decision-making and to ensure long-term survival of primary THAs.

The Cost and Consequences of Failed Osteosynthesis of Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures: A Matched Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate the cost and consequences of failed osteosynthesis of intertrochanteric femur fracture (ITFF) patients and compare with primary ITFF patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 689 patients who underwent surgery due to ITFF via cephalomedullary nail. 31 patients (5.8%) had revision surgery because of osteosynthesis failure of ITFF. Each revision case included in the study was matched with four primary ITFF cases as control group based on age, gender, year of operation, type of fracture and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade. Total cost for the admission that patients underwent surgery, mortality rate at first year, infection rate, length of stay at hospital, length of stay at intensive care unit, and erythrocyte transfusion amounts were recorded from hospital registry records. Tip apex distances (TAD) were noted.

RESULTS

The mean total cost of the revision cases and primary cases was 10,027 ± 6387 and 5261 ± 1773 Turkish Liras, respectively (p < 0.001). TAD was ≥ 20 mm in 32.3% (10/31) of patients in revision group while 2.4% (3/124) of the patients in control group (p < 0.001). The mean length of stay at hospital, length of stay at intensive care unit, erythrocyte transfusion amounts, infection rate and mortality rate at first year were significantly higher in revision cases compared to matched primary control cases (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Revision surgeries due to failed osteosynthesis of ITFFs with cephalomedullary nail have at least two times higher mean total cost than primary cases. The awareness of the cost, morbidity and mortality of the revision surgeries may reduce the modifiable risk factors of osteosynthesis failure including maintenance of TAD below 20 mm, obtaining optimal lag screw position and reduction quality.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3, retrospective cohort study.

Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty for Healed Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures. A Matched Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Many studies have analyzed the outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) after failed intertrochanteric fracture fixation, but not after healed fracture. The objective is to investigate the influence of a prior healed intertrochanteric fracture fixation on the outcomes of a subsequent THA for osteoarthritis.

METHODS

This is a matched retrospective cohort study of THA between 43 patients who suffered a prior intertrochanteric fracture successfully managed with internal fixation and 43 patients without prior hip fracture. Mean age was 73.6 vs 74.2 years. A conventional cementless THA was used in both groups. Functional outcome was assessed by the Harris hip score (HHS) and reduced Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index questionnaire. Radiological assessment was also performed.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 6.6 (range, 5-8) years. The mean operative time and blood transfusion rate were significantly higher in the fracture group (P = .001), but there was no significant difference in the length of stay. HHS significantly improved in both groups. At final follow-up, HHS was significantly higher in nonfracture group (P = .008), but the rate of patients with excellent and good outcomes was similar (P = .616). Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score at the final follow-up was not different between groups (P = .058). Complication rate was similar between groups. There were no revisions, dislocations, or loose implants in the study group.

CONCLUSION

Cementless THA provided successful functional outcomes and implant durability at medium term in patients treated for osteoarthritis following healed intertrochanteric fracture fixation, comparable to those without prior fracture who underwent primary THA. Surgical complexity and complication rate were low.

The Value of Serological Screening Prior to Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

This study sought (1) to assess the value of serological testing prior to conversion total hip arthroplasty (THA) in predicting infection and (2) to identify optimal serological values for routine diagnostic workup prior to conversion THA.

METHODS

All patients at our tertiary referral center undergoing conversion THA after hip/acetabular fracture procedure from 2013 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were patients previously undergoing hemiarthroplasty or open reduction and internal fixation of acetabular, intertrochanteric, and subtrochanteric fractures that progressed to conversion THA due to post-traumatic arthritis having erythrocyte sedimentation rate/C-reactive protein (CRP) prior to conversion. Infection was defined as positive intraoperative cultures not deemed contaminant in collaboration with infectious disease consult and/or development of PJI within 1 year postoperatively.

RESULTS

Twelve of 87 (14%) patients undergoing conversion THA developed infection. The mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate (37.2 vs 24.4 mm/h, P = .2062) and CRP (22.4 vs 9.0 mg/L, P = .0026) in the infected cohort were elevated compared to the noninfected group. An optimal cutoff value for CRP of 12 mg/L (area under the curve = 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.58-0.97) revealed 75% sensitivity, 84% specificity, 43% positive predictive value, and 95% negative predictive value (P < .0001) in the entire cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Even without clinical signs and symptoms, patients undergoing conversion THA from internal fixation of hip/acetabular fractures are still at high risk for developing periprosthetic joint infection. All patients undergoing conversion THA should have CRP measured preoperatively as a part of the diagnostic workup for underlying infection. Further research should be devoted to creating a preoperative diagnostic algorithm incorporating CRP, similar to Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria, dedicated to patients undergoing conversion THA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Diagnostic retrospective cohort study.

The anterior approach for conversion hip arthroplasty

Conversion of prior proximal femoral fracture fixation to hip arthroplasty is a fairly common and successful procedure, necessitated by various modes of failure. The procedure is well described utilizing a posterior or anterolateral surgical approach. The anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty has gained in popularity. The approach allows for supine positioning and facilitates live fluoroscopic imaging. We present possible advantages and disadvantages, as well as the surgical technique, of conversion to total hip arthroplasty via the direct anterior approach.

Total hip arthroplasty following failed intertrochanteric hip fracture fixation treated with a cephalomedullary nail

AIMS

Cephalomedullary nails (CMNs) are commonly used for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) may be used as a salvage procedure when fixation fails in these patients. The aim of this study was to analyze the complications of THA following failed intertrochanteric hip fracture fixation using a CMN.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent THA were identified from the 5% subset of Medicare Parts A/B between 2002 and 2015. A subgroup involving those with an intertrochanteric fracture that was treated using a CMN during the previous five years was identified and compared with the remaining patients who underwent THA. The length of stay (LOS) was compared using both univariate and multivariate analysis. The incidence of infection, dislocation, revision, and re-admission was compared between the two groups, using multivariate analysis adjusted for demographic, hospital, and clinical factors.

RESULTS

The Medicare data yielded 56 522 patients who underwent primary THA, of whom 369 had previously been treated with a CMN. The percentage of THAs that were undertaken between 2002 and 2005 in patients who had previously been treated with a CMN (0.346%) more than doubled between 2012 and 2015 (0.781%). The CMN group tended to be older and female, and to have a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index and lower socioeconomic status. The mean LOS was 1.5 days longer (5.3 vs 3.8) in the CMN group (p < 0.0001). The incidence of complications was significantly higher in the CMN group compared with the non-CMN group: infection (6.2% vs 2.6%), dislocation (8.1% vs 4.5%), revision (8.4% vs 4.3%), revision for infection (1.1% vs 0.37%), and revision for dislocation (2.2% vs 0.6%).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of conversion to THA following failed intertrochanteric hip fracture fixation using a CMN continues to increase. This occurs in elderly patients with increased comorbidities. There is a significantly increased risk of infection, dislocation, and LOS in these patients. Patients with failed intertrochanteric hip fracture fixation using a CMN who require THA should be made aware of the increased risk of complications, and steps need to be taken to reduce this risk. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B(6 Supple B):91-96.

Correlation between perioperative surgical factors and complications after hip arthroplasty, as a salvage procedure, following failure of internal fixation of osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures

Background and purpose

Salvage hip arthroplasty (SHA) in patients presenting with failed internal fixation after intertrochanteric fracture (FIF-ITFx) is a difficult procedure, and the incidence of perioperative mortality and complications following SHA are high. To our knowledge, no information related to the correlation between perioperative surgical factors and post-SHA perioperative complications in these patients has been demonstrated. This study aimed to identify the predictive factors for post-SHA perioperative complications in patients with FIF-ITFx.

Materials and methods

A total of 32 patients with FIF-ITFx who underwent SHA between 2010 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had been followed for 1 year post-operatively. Perioperative data and complication details related to fracture and treatment were collected. Predictive factors for post-SHA perioperative complications were analyzed via logistic regression analysis.

Results

Two (6%) patients died after SHA during the admission period. Perioperative complications were found in 16 (50%) patients, including surgical (n=3, 9%) and medical (n=15, 47%) complications, respectively. By univariate analysis, age (P=0.043), American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) grade 4 (P=0.016), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI; P=0.014), lymphocyte cell count (P=0.064), and serum albumin level (P=0.146) were correlated with the perioperative complications. However, multivariate regression analysis showed that CCI was the only significant independent predictor for post-SHA perioperative complications in these patients (OR=1.87; 95% CI, 1.14-2.07, P=0.014).

Conclusion

Our study showed that post-SHA perioperative complications in patients with FIF-ITFx are very common and predictable with a simple preoperative factor CCI. Therefore, special perioperative attention must be paid to patients with FIF-ITFx undergoing SHA and having multiple severe comorbid diseases or high CCI.

Total Hip Arthroplasty for Posttraumatic Conditions

Posttraumatic arthritis accounts for a notable share of secondary osteoarthritis about the hip joint. Compared with total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis or inflammatory arthritis, total hip arthroplasty for posttraumatic arthritis offers greater technical challenges because of bone deformities and retained implants. Careful preoperative evaluation is necessary to prepare the approach, hardware removal strategy, and implants necessary to address bone deficiencies. Although arthroplasty is a highly successful procedure for posttraumatic arthritis, the results are less favorable than surgery for primary osteoarthritis. It is associated with a higher incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications, including periprosthetic fractures, infection, instability, and decreased survivorship.

[Safety and efficacy of total hip arthroplasty following failed internal fixation of intertrochanteric fractures]

Objective

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of total hip arthroplasty (THA) following failed internal fixation of intertrochanteric fractures.

Methods

Between January 2007 and January 2016, THAs were performed in 32 patients (33 hips) for failed internal fixation of intertrochanteric fractures. There were 15 males and 17 females, with mean age of 74.0 years old (range, 65-87 years). There were 3 hips of Evans-Jensen type Ⅱ, 10 hips of type Ⅲ, 8 hips of type Ⅳ, and 12 hips of type Ⅴ. The fractures were fixed with dynamic hip screw in 18 hips, proximal femoral nail antirotation in 9 hips, locking plate in 5 hips, and hollow screw in 1 hip. The internal fixation failure caused by fracture displacement and nonunion in 22 patients, traumatic arthritis in 6 patients, fracture nonunion and infection in 3 patients, and avascular necrosis of the femoral head in 2 patients. The mean interval from initial fracture fixation to THA was 20 months (range, 2-48 months). The safety evaluation indicators included operation time, amount of operative bleeding and postoperative drainage, blood transfusion, and perioperative complications. The efficacy indexes included the hip Harris score, the range of motion (ROM), visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and the length difference between both legs; the X- ray films were taken to assess the prosthesis survival condition.

Results

The average operation time was 92 minutes (range, 55-135 minutes). The average amount of operative bleeding and postoperative drainage were 480 mL (range, 360-620 mL) and 350 mL (range, 220-520 mL), respectively. Intraoperative proximal femur fissure fracture occurred in 2 hips. After operation, 10 cases received allogeneic blood transfusion, 1 case occurred cerebral infarction, 2 hips experienced dislocation, 1 hip occurred greater trochanter re-fracture and dislocation because of spraining, and 1 case died of myocardial infarction. Twenty-nine patients (30 hips) were followed up 2-10 years (mean, 4.9 years). At last follow-up, there was no infection recurrence in 3 infected hips, and there was no prosthesis loosening, subsidence, or rupture in all cases. The Harris score, ROM, VAS score, and the length difference between both legs were significantly superior to preoperative ones ( P<0.05).

Conclusion

THA is an effective salvage procedure after failed internal fixation of intertrochanteric fracture. But its perioperative risks and complications are pretty high. Adequate preoperative evaluation, elaborate and individualized perioperative management are keys to make sure the patient can safely survive the perioperative period.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications in conversion arthroplasty methods for failed intertrochanteric fracture fixation

BACKGROUND

Conversion arthroplasty for failed primary fixation of intertrochanteric fractures can be achieved using various methods, including cemented total hip arthroplasty, uncemented total hip arthroplasty, hybrid total hip arthroplasty, and hemiarthroplasty. Complication rates vary between each conversion method. The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of conversion method on total conversion complication rates.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis of five studies with sufficient data for analysis. We created a null hypothesis stating that the expected distribution of complications across conversion methods would reflect the distribution of conversion method used for failed primary fixation. Using a z test, we compared proportions of the expected distribution of complications to the observed distribution of complications.

RESULTS

A total of 138 cases of conversion arthroplasty with 49 complications were available for analysis. The mean age was 73 (range, 32-96) years. 19 males and 48 females were included, with one study not including patient gender. The mean time from primary fixation failure to conversion was 11 months, and the mean duration of conversion surgery was 132 min. Expected and observed complication rate distributions were as follows: cemented total hip arthroplasty, 6.5% versus 4.1% (p = 0.79); uncemented total hip arthroplasty, 77.5% versus 81.6% (p = 0.69); hybrid total hip arthroplasty, 2.9% versus 2.0% (p = 1); and hemiarthroplasty, 13% versus 12.2% (p = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the method of conversion arthroplasty following failed primary intertrochanteric femur fracture fixation does not influence complication rate.

Total hip arthroplasty after failed fixation of a proximal femur fracture: Analysis of 59 cases of intra- and extra-capsular fractures

INTRODUCTION

The indications for total hip arthroplasty (THA) after failed internal fixation of a proximal femur fracture vary. Published studies on this topic are broad-ranging and do not distinguish between intracapsular and extracapsular fractures. This led us to conduct a retrospective analysis comparing the clinical outcomes, radiological outcomes, technical problems and complications between these two types of fractures.

HYPOTHESIS

The functional outcomes of THA after an extracapsular fracture will be worse than the ones after an intracapsular fracture.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-center study of 59 THA cases performed after internal fixation of a proximal femur fracture. These procedures were performed between 2002 and 2013 in 58 patients (22 men, 36 women). There were 40 intracapsular fractures and 19 extracapsular fractures. The initial fracture fixation involved a screw-plate (n=50), intramedullary nail (n=6) or screws (n=3). The mean patient age at the time of THA was 67 years [22-94]. The THA was performed an average of 2.8 years [0.2-28] after the fracture. The posterolateral approach was used in 55 cases (93%). Ten patients (17%) had the fixation hardware removed before the THA procedure, on average at 30 months [1-240] after the fracture. During the THA procedure, a cemented stem was used in 31 cases (53%) and a cementless stem in 28 cases (47%). A cementless press-fit cup was used in 56 cases (95%), of which 35 were dual mobility cups (60%), and a cemented cup was used in the other 3 cases (5%). All patients were reviewed by a physician not involved in the surgical procedures who performed a clinical and radiological examination.

RESULTS

No patients were lost to follow-up; two patients died. Ten patients suffered an intraoperative femur fracture (17%) and four suffered a dislocation (2 early, 2 late) (6.8%). Nine hips had to be reoperated (15%), of which five required an implant change (8.5%). There were significantly more intraoperative fractures and postoperative complications in the THA cases after extracapsular fracture. With a mean follow-up of 38 months [12-149], the mean PMA and Harris scores were 14.6 [3-18] and 74 [10-100], respectively; these scores were significantly lower in the THA cases after extracapsular fracture (p<0.05). With an endpoint of revision with implant change, the overall 40-month survival was 94% (95% CI: 0.25-0.55); it was 97% (95% CI: 0.62-0.85) for the intracapsular fracture cases and 84% (95% CI: 0.39-0.75) for the extracapsular fracture cases (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Secondary THA after failed fixation of proximal femur fractures has more complications than primary THA. Subgroup analysis identified more technical problems in the THA cases after extracapsular fracture and a higher number of complications, particularly dislocation and periprosthetic fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV - Retrospective study.

Conversion vs Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Increased Cost of Care and Perioperative Complications

BACKGROUND

With the increasing incidence of hip fractures and hip preservation surgeries, there has been a concomitant rise in the number of conversion total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed. Prior studies have shown higher complication rates in conversion THA. However, there is a paucity of data showing differences in cost between these 2 procedures. Currently, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services bundles primary and conversion THA in the same Medicare Severity-Diagnosis Related Group for hospital reimbursement. More evidence is needed to support the reclassification of conversion THA.

METHODS

The cohort provided by the institutional database included 163 conversion THAs between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2015. Intraoperative complications, estimated blood loss, operative time, postoperative complications, and perioperative cost data were analyzed for 163 primary THA patients matched to the conversion THA cohort.

RESULTS

Compared with primary THA, conversion THA had significantly (P < .05) greater cost for direct labor, other direct costs, intermediate nursing services, other diagnostic/therapy, surgery services, physical/occupational/speech therapy, radiology, laboratories, blood, medical/surgical supply, and total direct costs. In addition, the conversion THA group had significantly greater operative times, estimated blood loss, length of stay, intraoperative complications, and postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

Conversion THA, as compared with primary THA, is associated with greater costs (approximately 19% greater), increased surgical times, and perioperative complications. To prevent these additional expenses from creating patient selection bias and a barrier to care, the conversion THA Medicare Severity-Diagnosis Related Group should be reclassified, or modifiers created.

Salvage of failed internal fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures: clinical and functional outcomes of total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty

Background

Failed internal fixation of intertrochanteric (IT) hip fractures presents a significant challenge in the elderly, osteoporotic population. Conversion total hip arthroplasty (cTHA) and hemiarthroplasty (cHA) are both accepted salvage operations for failed IT fracture fixation, though limited clinical data exist regarding the optimal treatment between these procedures.

Methods

A systematic review of 3 databases (PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase) was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Inclusion criteria were English-language studies that compared clinical or functional outcomes after failed fixation of IT fractures with total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty in adult subjects (>18 years of age). Data regarding research design, surgical technique, and clinical or functional outcomes were obtained and analyzed from eligible studies using a Mantel-Haenszel random-effects analysis model.

Results

Six studies with 188 patients (100, total hip arthroplasty; 88, hemiarthroplasty) met inclusion and exclusion criteria. There was no significant difference between cTHA and cHA for postoperative dislocation, reoperation, infection, intraoperative fractures, postoperative fractures, or stem subsidence. The mean change in Harris Hip Scores was significantly higher (P < .001) in the cTHA group (47.5 ± 4.9) than that in the cHA (38.9 ± 7.2) group at minimum 14-month follow-up.

Conclusions

Despite potential advantages of cTHA or cHA for failed IT fractures, there were no differences in complications between either of the salvage procedures. Our analysis found a slight advantage in functional outcomes (Harris Hip Score) for cTHA at a minimum 14-month follow-up. Our study suggests that cTHA and cHA are both effective salvage procedures. Additional prospective studies are warranted to further delineate outcomes after salvage arthroplasty performed for failed IT fracture fixation.

Alternative Payment Models Should Risk-Adjust for Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

BACKGROUND

For Medicare beneficiaries, hospital reimbursement for nonrevision hip arthroplasty is anchored to either diagnosis-related group code 469 or 470. Under alternative payment models, reimbursement for care episodes is not further risk-adjusted. This study's purpose was to compare outcomes of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) vs conversion THA to explore the rationale for risk adjustment for conversion procedures.

METHODS

All primary and conversion THAs from 2007 to 2014, excluding acute hip fractures and cancer patients, were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Conversion and primary THA patients were matched 1:1 using propensity scores, based on preoperative covariates. Multivariable logistic regressions evaluated associations between conversion THA and 30-day outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 2018 conversions were matched to 2018 primaries. There were no differences in preoperative covariates. Conversions had longer operative times (148 vs 95 minutes, P < .001), more transfusions (37% vs 17%, P < .001), and longer length of stay (4.4 vs 3.1 days, P < .001). Conversion THA had increased odds of complications (odds ratio [OR] 1.75; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.37-2.24), deep infection (OR 4.21; 95% CI 1.72-10.28), discharge to inpatient care (OR 1.52; 95% CI 1.34-1.72), and death (OR 2.39; 95% CI 1.04-5.47). Readmission odds were similar.

CONCLUSION

Compared with primary THA, conversion THA is associated with more complications, longer length of stay, and increased discharge to continued inpatient care, implying greater resource utilization for conversion patients. As reimbursement models shift toward bundled payment paradigms, conversion THA appears to be a procedure for which risk adjustment is appropriate.

Hip resurfacing in patients with severe osteoarthritis and blocked medullary canal

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluated the effectiveness of hip resurfacing in patients with femoral deformities or retained femoral implants. Implant removal and conversion total hip replacement (CTHR) have been associated with increased operative time, blood loss, and cost. Removing intramedullary nails in particular can be difficult and can result in a more difficult recovery and/or complications. Hip resurfacing can be performed with a blocked femoral canal and has the possible additional benefits of a less-complex procedure, improved functional outcomes, better patient survivorship, and a possibly less-complicated revision should a failure occur.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The author performed hip resurfacing in 61 patients (65 hips) with a blocked femur who had been advised elsewhere that they could not undergo THR without also undergoing additional surgical procedures. The perioperative complexity of resurfacing was evaluated by recording operative time, blood loss and functional outcomes using the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Short-Form 12 (SF-12) questionnaire. Implant survivorship was evaluated by the need for revision surgery.

RESULTS

At 9 years' mean follow-up (range 5-19 years), 59 of the 61 patients presented for postoperative evaluation. The mean operative time was 104 minutes and the mean blood loss was 300 cc. The mean HHS improved from 41 to 92 ( p < 0.001) and the mean SF-12 physical and mental scores improved from 26 to 49 and from 44 to 54, respectively ( p < 0.001). None of the procedures failed or required revision.

CONCLUSION

Canal-sparing hip resurfacing is a successful and less complicated option than CTHR when there is deformity or retained implant blocking the femoral canal.

Risk Factors Associated With Cephalomedullary Nail Cutout in the Treatment of Trochanteric Hip Fractures

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the association of cephalomedullary nail cutout in trochanteric femur fractures with the presence of the following radiographic variables: lateral wall fracture, posteromedial fragment, angular malreduction, residual basicervical fracture gapping, screw placement, and tip-apex distance.

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Academic medical center.

PATIENTS

A total of 362 patients were included in the study. The average age was 83 years and the majority was female. All sustained low-energy trochanteric femur fractures treated operatively with cephalomedullary nails. Minimum radiographic follow-up was 3 months, with an average of 11 (range 3-88) months.

INTERVENTION

Cephalomedullary nailing with either a lag screw or helical blade.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Cutout of the lag screw or helical blade.

RESULTS

A total of 22 (6%) cutouts occurred. Univariate analysis showed significantly (P ≤ 0.01) more frequent cutout with fracture of the lateral wall, posteromedial fragment, residual gapping (>3 mm) at basicervical component, neck-shaft malreduction >5 degrees varus or 15 degrees valgus, and tip-apex distance >25 mm, and superior screw/blade positioning. There was no difference with unstable fracture pattern (P = 0.58) or fellowship training (P = 0.21). Multivariate regression analysis demonstrates that lateral wall fracture (Odds ratios [OR] = 8.0, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4-27.1), neck-shaft malreduction (OR = 4.3, CI, 1.3-14.7), and residual basicervical gapping (OR = 3.6, CI, 1.0-13.0) were associated with fixation cutout.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk factors for cutout of trochanteric fractures in our study can be viewed as modifiable or nonmodifiable factors. Statistically significant factors included lateral wall fracture (nonmodifiable) as well as basicervical gapping and malreduction (modifiable).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Hip Arthroplasty After Surgical Treatment of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures

BACKGROUND

Although use of intramedullary hip screws (IMHS) for intertrochanteric (IT) hip fractures has become more common, limited data have suggested difficulties in conversion to hip arthroplasty. The present study investigates whether conversion of failed IT fracture fixation with an intramedullary vs extramedullary device leads to different rates or types of complications or decreased arthroplasty survivorship.

METHODS

One hundred eleven patients were converted to hip arthroplasty after previous surgical treatment of an IT fracture from 2000 to 2010. Seventy hips had been treated with an extramedullary fixation device (EFD) and 41 with an IMHS.

RESULTS

Length of hospital stay and operative times were similar (6 days and 206 minutes for EFD vs 6 days and 208 minutes for IMHS; P > .7). The presence of a Trendelenburg gait at last clinical follow-up was similar between groups (37% in EFD group and 38% in IMHS group). Five-year survivorship free of revision was 95% in the EFD group and 94% in the IMHS group (P = 1.0). The overall complication rate was similar (21% for EFD vs 27% for IMHS; P = .51) between groups. The most common complication was late periprosthetic fracture in the EFD patients (6% vs 0% in IMHS; P = .29) and intraoperative femoral fracture in the IMHS patients (12% vs 1% in EFD; P = .02).

CONCLUSION

The short-term survivorship of conversion hip arthroplasty after surgical treatment of an IT fracture is excellent regardless of original fracture fixation method. If early complications, particularly periprosthetic fractures, can be minimized, the likelihood of a successful outcome is high. The risk of intraoperative femoral fracture was greater during conversion from an IMHS compared to an EFD.

Quantifying Blood Loss and Transfusion Risk After Primary vs Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and conversion THA may result in substantial blood loss, sometimes necessitating transfusion. Despite the complexities of the latter, both are grouped in the same category for quality assessment and reimbursement. This study's purpose was to compare both blood loss and transfusion risk in primary and conversion THA and identify their associated predictors.

METHODS

A total of 1616 patients who underwent primary and conversion THA at a single hospital from 2009-2013 were reviewed (primary THA = 1575; conversion THA = 41). Demographics, comorbidities, and perioperative data were collected from electronic records. Blood loss was calculated using a validated method. Transfusion triggers were based on standardized criteria. Separate multivariable regression models for blood loss and transfusion were performed.

RESULTS

Conversion THA patients were younger (P = .002), had lower age-adjusted Charlson scores (P = .006), longer surgeries (P < .001), higher blood loss (P < .001), and more transfusions (P < .001). Primary and conversion THA groups were different in terms of surgical approach (P < .001), anesthesia type (P = .002), and venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (P = .01). Compared to primary THA, conversion THA had an average 478.9 mL higher blood loss (P = .003) and increased adjusted odds ratio of 3.2 (P = .019) for transfusion.

CONCLUSION

Conversion THA leads to higher blood loss and transfusion compared with primary THA. These differences were quantified in the present study and showed consistent results between the 2 metrics. The differences between these procedures should be addressed during quality assurance because conversion THA is associated with higher resource utilization, which is important in the allocation of resources and tiered reimbursement strategies.

Conversion Hip Arthroplasty in Failed Fixation of Intertrochanteric Fracture: A Propensity Score Matching Study

BACKGROUND

Conversion hip arthroplasty is a salvage procedure for failed internal fixation of intertrochanteric fractures. However, the technical difficulties and perioperative morbidity of conversion arthroplasty are uncertain.

METHODS

We compared the type of arthroplasty (total hip arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty), operative parameters, perioperative morbidity, 1-year mortality, implant stability, and clinical results of 33 conversion hip arthroplasties due to a failed internal fixation of intertrochanteric fracture with those of a matched control group of 33 primary hip arthroplasties due to the same fracture. Propensity score was used for the control matching of gender, age, and body mass index.

RESULTS

Total hip arthroplasty was more frequently performed in the conversion group (10/33) compared to the primary group (3/33) (P = .016). The operation time, perioperative blood loss, amount of transfusion, and risk of femoral fracture during the operation were increased in the conversion group. The overall 1-year mortality was 3% (1 patient) in the conversion group and 9% (3 patients) in the primary group (P = .307). At a mean of 3-year follow-up, there was no significant difference in clinical results and none of the implants were loose in both groups.

CONCLUSION

In patients with failed internal fixation of intertrochanteric fracture, conversion hip arthroplasty should be planned and executed, bearing in mind the increased operative morbidities corresponding to operation time, perioperative blood loss, requirement of transfusion, and intraoperative femoral fracture.

Conversion to total hip arthroplasty after failed proximal femoral nail antirotations or dynamic hip screw fixations for stable intertrochanteric femur fractures: a retrospective study with a minimum follow-up of 3 years

Background

Conversion to total hip arthroplasty (CTHA) is a relatively common procedure after a failed dynamic hip screw (DHS) or proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) fixation of intertrochanteric fractures, but there have been far fewer reports specifically describing the long-term results of CTHA after failed treatments of stable intertrochanteric fractures with DHS or PFNA. The aim of the present study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of CTHA after failed PFNA or DHS fixations of stable intertrochanteric fractures after a minimum follow-up of 3 years.

Methods

Between January 2005 and April 2014, we retrospectively reviewed 142 active elderly patients treated at our institution (a single institution study). A total of 72 patients (72 hips; 41 women, 31 men; mean age 76.9 years old; range 60–92 years old) who underwent conversion of a failed PFNA to a THA were compared with 70 patients (70 hips; 36 women, 34 men; mean age 75.0 years old; range 60–90 years old) who underwent CTHA after a failed DHS fixation. The mean follow-up periods were 48 (range 43–52) and 48 (range 44–52) months for the DHS and PFNA groups, respectively. Clinical and radiologic evaluations were performed on all patients. The primary outcome was the Harris Hip Score (HHS). The secondary outcomes were the complication rates.

Results

The Harris Hip Score (HHS) improved from 50.61 ± 3.23 preoperatively to 85.28 ± 4.45 at the last follow-up in the PFNA group and from 51.46 ± 3.90 to 84.50 ± 4.34 in the DHS group, with no significant differences noted between the groups at each follow-up (P > 0.05). However, the complication rate in the converted DHS patients was significantly higher (42.9%) than that in the converted PFNA patients (20.8%; P = 0.003). Thirty-seven PFFs (2.4%) occurred during a mean follow-up of 44.4 months. The incidence of periprosthetic fractures was found to be significantly higher (P = 0.021) for the DHS group (15.7%) than for the PFNA group (4.2%).

Conclusions

CTHA after failed DHS fixations of stable intertrochanteric fractures might be associated with a significantly higher complication rate than CTHA after failed PFNA fixations. Therefore, PFNA patients with stable intertrochanteric fractures may be more suitable for CTHA.

Surgical Treatment of Undisplaced Femur Neck Fractures in Dementia Patients Using Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation

Purpose

People with dementia have poor mobility and discharge outcomes following hip fractures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of internal fixation of undisplaced femur neck fractures (Garden types 1 and 2) by proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in dementia patients.

Materials and Methods

We studied retrospectively 19 patients with undisplaced femur neck fracture. All patients were over 70 years of age, walked independently with a cane or crutches and suffered moderate-to-severe dementia. Patients were treated with PFNA and followed-up for more than 2 years. Revision, loss of fixation, complications, and walking ability outcomes were measured.

Results

In walking-ability evaluation, patients showed an average decrease of just 0.2 points at the final follow-up. Walking ability was evaluated from before injury to 4 weeks after surgery and decreased by less than 0.5 points. Radiological bone union was achieved in 17 cases; the average time to bone union was 4.14 months (range, 2.5-7 months). Complications included non-union in two cases and femoral head avascular necrosis in one case of non-union.

Conclusion

We found that for patients with osteoporotic bone tissues in their femoral heads or patients (e.g., those suffering dementia) for whom cooperating with medical workers for postoperative walking control or rehabilitation exercises is difficult, implanting a mechanically stable spiral blade for fixation of femoral neck fractures could facilitate walking after surgery.

A Guide to Improving the Care of Patients with Fragility Fractures, Edition 2

Over the past 4 decades, much has been learned about the pathophysiology and treatment of osteoporosis, the prevention of fragility fractures, and the perioperative management of patients who have these debilitating injuries. However, the volume of published literature on this topic is staggering and far too voluminous for any clinician to review and synthesize by him or herself. This manuscript thoroughly summarizes the latest research on fragility fractures and provides the reader with valuable strategies to optimize the prevention and management of these devastating injuries. The information contained in this article will prove invaluable to any health care provider or health system administrator who is involved in the prevention and management of fragility hip fractures. As providers begin to gain a better understanding of the principles espoused in this article, it is our hope that they will be able to use this information to optimize the care they provide for elderly patients who are at risk of or who have osteoporotic fractures.

Systematic Review of Adverse Effects: A Further Step towards Modernization of Acupuncture in China

As a further step towards the modernization of acupuncture, the objective of this review was to figure out the frequency and severity of adverse complications and events in acupuncture treatment reported from 1980 to 2013 in China. All first-hand case reports of acupuncture-related complications and adverse events that could be identified in the scientific literature were reviewed and classified according to the type of complication and adverse event, circumstance of the event, and long-term patient outcome. The selected case reports were published between 1980 and 2013 in 3 databases. Relevant papers were collected and analyzed by 2 reviewers. Over the 33 years, 182 incidents were identified in 133 relevant papers. Internal organ, tissue, or nerve injury is the main complications of acupuncture especially for pneumothorax and central nervous system injury. Adverse effects also included syncope, infections, hemorrhage, allergy, burn, aphonia, hysteria, cough, thirst, fever, somnolence, and broken needles. Qualifying training of acupuncturists should be systemized and the clinical acupuncture operations should be standardized in order to effectively prevent the occurrence of acupuncture accidents, enhance the influence of acupuncture, and further popularize acupuncture to the rest of the world.

Total hip arthroplasty after previous fracture surgery

Total hip arthroplasty can be a very effective salvage treatment for both failed fracture surgery and hip arthritis that may occur after prior fracture surgery. The rate of complications is significantly increased including especially infection, dislocation, and loosening. Complications are more likely to occur after failed open reduction and internal fixation than after posttraumatic arthritis. Adequately ruling out infection before hip arthroplasty can be difficult. The best predictor of infection is a prior infection. Long-term outcomes can be comparable to outcomes in other conditions if complications are avoided.

Anterolateral intermuscular approach for type A2 intertrochanteric fractures: a cadaveric study

This cadaveric study was designed to clarify the anatomic basis of using an anterolateral intermuscular approach to repair type A2 intertrochanteric fractures (ITF). The conventional lateral approach to surgery that is used for ITF has several disadvantages that can result in both intraoperative and postoperative complications, especially for type A2 ITF. Previous studies have suggested using minimally-invasive total hip arthroplasty (THA) with an anterolateral approach. The legs of 10 formalin-fixed Asian cadavers were dissected, simulating an anterolateral surgical approach. The distances from the superior gluteal nerve and the lateral femoral circumflex artery branches to the lateral protrusive point of the greater trochanter were measured. The anterolateral intermuscular approach provided excellent exposure of the GT, the lesser trochanter and the femoral neck. The gluteus medius branch of the ascending branch of the lateral femoral circumflex artery (GMB-LFCA) and the most inferior branch of the superior gluteal nerve (MIB-SGN) were found to cross the spatium intermusculare between the gluteus medius and the tensor fasciae latae. The distance from the GMB-LFCA, in the intermuscular plane, to the lateral protrusive point of the GT was (4.04 ± 1.00 cm, range 2.96-6.62 cm); and the distance from the MIB-SGN to the lateral protrusive point of the GT was (5.47 ± 1.61 cm, range 3.68-9.56 cm). The anterolateral intermuscular approach is relatively safe, provides excellent exposure, and causes less soft-tissue damage than the traditional approach, and it represents a promising new method to surgically treat type A2 ITF.

Combined bilateral femoral head necrosis and pertrochanteric fracture: a case report

INTRODUCTION

Modular femoral implants have become a regular feature of revision hip surgery. However, for a primary hip arthroplasty, such as a femoral neck fracture case, the implant of choice is a standard femoral component, while compelling literature evidence have made osteosynthesis the standard procedure for the vast majority of trochanteric fractures.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present the case of a 66-year-old Caucasian woman presenting with two trochanteric fractures associated with primary and secondary hip osteoarthritis that were treated with an uncemented total hip replacement with a modular femoral component.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that a modular femoral component can address the issues of stability and, in our case, proved to be a viable solution for treating cases that are complicated by concomitant acetabular or femoral head and neck pathology.

Extramedullary compared with intramedullary implants for intertrochanteric hip fractures: thirty-day outcomes of 4432 procedures from the ACS NSQIP database

BACKGROUND

For more than thirty-five years, the sliding hip screw, an extramedullary implant, has been the standard treatment for the stabilization of intertrochanteric fractures. Over the last decade, intramedullary implants have replaced extramedullary implants as the most commonly used type of implant in the United States for the treatment of this condition, without strong evidence of superior outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study with use of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database. Patients seventy years of age or older who had sustained an intertrochanteric fracture treated with extramedullary or intramedullary implant during 2009 to 2012 were identified. General surgical outcomes were compared between implant types, with adjustment for demographic data and comorbidities.

RESULTS

A total of 4432 patients were identified; 1612 (36.4%) were treated with an extramedullary implant, and 2820 (63.6%) with an intramedullary implant. The rates of the composite outcomes "serious adverse events" and "any adverse events" did not differ by implant type. The mean postoperative length of stay was shorter for patients treated with an intramedullary implant compared with those treated with an extramedullary implant (5.4 compared with 6.5 days; p < 0.001). Operation time, operating room time, and the rate of hospital readmission did not differ by implant type.

CONCLUSIONS

These results reinforce the results of previous randomized trials, demonstrating little difference in rates of general surgical adverse events between implant types. The present study presents an important departure from previous trials in its finding that patients treated with intramedullary implants have, on average, a shorter postoperative length of stay (by 1.1 days). The finding may negate the perceived excess cost associated with intramedullary treatment. Limitations regarding the ACS NSQIP database include a lack of detail regarding fracture subtype, outcomes beyond thirty days, and orthopaedic-specific outcomes.