Early PROMs following total knee arthroplasty--functional outcome dependent on patella resurfacing

The influence of implant factors on patient outcomes in primary total knee arthroplasty

Background

The influence of implant factors on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has previously been studied but findings are often inconsistent, restricted in scope and biased by confounding factors. This study aims to determine the association between implant-related factors and early post-operative PROMs after TKA.

Methods

Using data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) PROMs program, the study included 9487 primary TKA procedures performed in 43 hospitals from July 31, 2018 to December 31, 2020. Data included baseline demographic data, surgical details and PROMs collected pre- and 6 months post-operatively. Seven prosthesis characteristics were incorporated in the multivariable model, with proportional odds ordinal regression analysis used to assess their effects on post-operative Oxford knee score (OKS) and joint pain. Adjustments were made for pre-operative OKS and joint pain, as well as potential patient confounders.

Results

At six months, fixed bearing implants showed higher odds of better OKS compared to mobile bearing implants (odds ratio [OR] = 1.20, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.37. p < 0.004). Similar findings were found with the use of image derived instrumentation (IDI) (OR = 1.27, 95 % CI 1.11-1.46, p < 0.001), robotic assisted vs. non-navigated knees (OR = 1.21, 95 % CI 1.06-1.38, p < 0.005) and no patella resurfacing (OR = 1.10, 95 % CI 1.01-1.20, p < 0.032). For lower pain scores at six months, the use of highly crosslinked polyethylene (OR = 1.12, 95 % CI 1.02-1.22, p < 0.015), cemented femoral components (OR = 1.11, 95 % CI 1.01-1.22, p < 0.024), IDI (OR = 1.20, 95 % CI 1.05-1.37, p < 0.009) or no patella resurfacing (OR = 1.10, 95 % CI 1.01-1.20, p < 0.034) were associated.

Conclusion

Utilizing a fixed bearing or robotic assistance correlated with improved OKS scores, whereas highly crosslinked polyethylene or cemented femoral components were associated with improved pain scores. At six months, the use of IDI compared to non-navigated TKA, and patellar resurfacing showed both improved OKS and pain scores.

Decreased Patellar Fractures and Subluxation With Patellar Component Replacement at Stage-One Spacer

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic joint infection is a devastating complication of total knee arthroplasty and is often treated with 2-stage revision. We retrospectively assessed whether replacing the patellar component with articulating stage-one spacers was associated with improved outcomes compared to spacers without patellar component replacement.

METHODS

A total of 139 patients from a single academic institution were identified who underwent an articulating stage-one revision total knee arthroplasty and had at least 1-year follow-up. Of the 139 patients, 91 underwent patellar component removal without replacement, while 48 had a patellar component replaced at stage-one revision. Patellar fracture and reinfection at any point after stage-one were recorded. Knee range of motion (ROM), patellar thickness, lateral tilt, and lateral displacement were measured at 6-weeks post stage-one. Chi-square, Fisher's exact, and t-tests were utilized for comparisons. There were no significant demographic differences between groups.

RESULTS

Patellar component replacement at stage-one revision was associated with fewer patellar fractures (2.1 versus 12.1%, P = .046), less lateral patellar displacement (1.7 versus 16.0 mm, P < .01), and improved pre to postoperative knee ROM 6 weeks after stage-one (+5.9 versus -11.4°, P = .03). There was no difference in reinfections after stage-2 revision for the replaced or unreplaced patellar groups (15.4 versus 15%, P = 1.000). While the mean time between stage-one and stage-2 was not different (5.2 versus 4.5 months, P = .50), at one-year follow-up, significantly more patients in the patellar component replacement group were satisfied and refused stage-2 revision (45.8 versus 3.3%, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Replacing the patellar component at stage-one revision is associated with a decreased rate of patellar fracture and lateral patellar subluxation, improved ROM, and possible increased patient satisfaction, as reflected by nearly half of these patients electing to keep their spacer. There was no difference in reinfection rates between the cohorts.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in High-Risk Medical Device Registries: A Scoping Review

Little is known about the methods and outcomes of patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) use among high-risk medical device registries. The objective of this scoping review was to assess the utility and predictive ability of PROMs in high-risk medical device registries. We searched Ovid Medline, Embase, APA PsychINFO, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases for published literature. After searching, 4323 titles and abstracts were screened, and 262 full texts were assessed for their eligibility. Seventy-six papers from across orthopedic (n = 64), cardiac (n = 10), penile (n = 1), and hernia mesh (n = 1) device registries were identified. Studies predominantly used PROMs as an outcome measure when comparing cohorts or surgical approaches (n = 45) or to compare time points (n = 13) including pre- and postintervention. Fifteen papers considered the predictive ability of PROMs. Of these, 8 treated PROMs as an outcome, 5 treated PROMs as a risk factor through regression analysis, and 2 papers treated PROMs as both a risk factor and as an outcome. One paper described PROMs to study implant survival. To advance methods of PROM integration into clinical decision-making for medical devices, an understanding of their use in high-risk device registries is needed. This scoping review found that there is a paucity of studies using PROMs to predict long-term patient and clinical outcomes in high-risk medical device registries. Determination as to why PROMs are rarely used for predictive purposes in long-term data collection is needed if PROM data are to be considered suitable as real-world evidence for high-risk device regulatory purposes, as well as to support clinical decision-making.

Level of Evidence 4

Incidence of Anterior Knee Pain and Functional Difficulty in a Prospectively Recruited Cohort Following Total Knee Arthroplasty With Selective Patellar Resurfacing

BACKGROUND

The influence of patellar resurfacing on anterior knee pain, stair climbing, and functional activity outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are incompletely understood. This study examined the influence of patellar resurfacing on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) relating to anterior knee pain and function.

METHODS

The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score of Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR.) patient PROMs were collected preoperatively and at 12 months follow-up for 950 TKAs performed over 5 years. Indications for patellar resurfacing included Grade IV patello-femoral (PFJ) changes or mechanical PFJ findings during patellar trialing. Patellar resurfacing was performed on 393 (41%) of the 950 TKAs performed. Multivariable binomial logistic regressions were performed, using KOOS, JR. questions assessing pain during stair climbing, standing upright, and function during rising from sitting as surrogates for anterior knee pain. Independent regression models were performed for each of the targeted KOOS, JR. questions, with adjustment for age at surgery, sex, and baseline pain and function.

RESULTS

No association was observed between 12-month postoperative anterior knee pain or function with patellar resurfacing (P = .17, .97). Patients who had moderate or greater preoperative pain on stairs had an increased likelihood of postoperative pain and functional difficulty (odds ratio 2.3, P = .013), while males were 42% less likely to report postoperative anterior knee pain (odds ratio 0.58, P = .002).

CONCLUSION

Selective patellar resurfacing based on PFJ degeneration and mechanical PFJ symptoms produces similar improvement in PROMs for resurfaced and unresurfaced knees.

Patellar resurfacing and kneeling ability after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Difficulty kneeling following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains highly prevalent, and has cultural, social, and occupational implications. With no clear evidence of superiority, whether or not to resurface the patella remains debatable. This systematic review examined whether resurfacing the patella (PR) or not (NPR) influences kneeling ability following TKA.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted by following PRISMA guidelines. Three electronic databases were searched utilizing a search strategy developed with the aid of a department librarian. Study quality was assessed using MINROS criteria. Article screening, methodological quality assessment and data extraction were performed by two independent authors, and a third senior author was consulted if consensus was not reached.

RESULTS

A total of 459 records were identified, with eight studies included in the final analysis, and all deemed to be level III evidence. The average MINORS score was 16.5 for comparative studies and 10.5 for non-comparative studies. The total number of patients was 24,342, with a mean age of 67.6 years. Kneeling ability was predominantly measured as a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), with two studies also including an objective assessment. Two studies demonstrated a statistically significant link between PR and kneeling, with one demonstrating improved kneeling ability with PR and the other reporting the opposite. Other potential factors associated with kneeling included gender, postoperative flexion, and body mass index (BMI). Re-operation rates were significantly higher in the NPR cohort whereas PR cohorts had higher Feller scores, patient-reported limp and patellar apprehension.

CONCLUSION

Despite its importance to patients, kneeling remains not only under-reported but also ill-defined in the literature, with no clear consensus regarding the optimum outcome assessment tool. Conflicting evidence remains as to whether PR influences kneeling ability, and to clarify the situation, large prospective randomized studies are required.

Patella resurfacing is not associated with a difference in the Oxford knee score after total knee arthroplasty but stair descent is enhanced

BACKGROUND

The primary aim was to assess the Oxford knee scores (OKS) on patients who underwent a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with patellar resurfacing compared to those who did not. Secondary aims were to identify: (1) factors associated with resurfacing, (2) the effect of resurfacing on specific components of the OKS related to patellofemoral function, (3) the influence on patient satisfaction, and (4) whether a subgroup of patients had an improved outcome when resurfacing was undertaken.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was undertaken using outcome data from the arthroplasty database held at the study centre. Patient demographics and OKS were collected preoperatively and at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Patient satisfaction was assessed at 1 and 2 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

Three thousand one hundred and twenty-two patients met the inclusion criteria of which 46.5% (n = 1453) underwent resurfacing. There were no differences in the OKS change at 1 or 2 years between those undergoing and not undergoing resurfacing (difference 0.2, p ≥ 0.469). Patients undergoing resurfacing were more likely to be female (odds ratio (OR) 1.53, 95% CI 1.30-1.79, p < 0.001), undergo a posterior stabilised knee (OR 6.87, 95% CI 5.71-8.27, p < 0.001) or had a worse response to question 5-standing from a chair, (p = 0.011) or 12-stair descent, (p = 0.017) of the OKS preoperatively. There was no difference in postoperative patient satisfaction (p ≥ 0.180). There was a significantly greater improvement in question 12 of the OKS at 1 year (p = 0.019) in the resurfaced group. There were no patient-related factors or symptoms that were associated with a clinically significant (≥ 5 points) greater postoperative OKS.

CONCLUSION

Patella resurfacing was not associated with a clinically important improvement in OKS. No specific indications for patella resurfacing were identified that offered an improved outcome, but when it was undertaken there was a greater improvement in the ability to descend stairs. Level of evidence Retrospective diagnostic study, Level III.

The Fate and Relevance of the Patella in Two-Stage Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear whether reimplantation of a patellar component during a two-stage revision for periprosthetic total knee arthroplasty infection (PJI) affects patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) or implant survivorship. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether patellar resurfacing during reimplantation confers a functional benefit or increases implant survivorship after two-stage treatment for PJI.

METHODS

Two-stage revisions for knee PJI performed by three surgeons at a single tertiary care center were reviewed retrospectively. All original patellar components and cement were removed during resection and the patella was resurfaced whenever feasible during reimplantation. PROMs, implant survivorship, and radiographic measurements (patellar tilt and displacement) were compared between knees reimplanted with a patellar component versus those without a patellar component.

RESULTS

A total of 103 patients met the inclusion criteria. Forty-three patients (41.7%) underwent reimplantation with, and 60 patients (58.3%) without a patellar component. At a mean follow-up of 33.5 months, there were no significant differences in patient demographics or PROMs between groups (P ≥ .156). No significant differences were found in the estimated Kaplan-Meier all-cause, aseptic, or septic survivorship between groups (P ≥ .342) at a maximum of 75 months follow-up. There was no significant difference in the change (pre-resection to post-reimplant) of patellar tilt (P = .504) or displacement (P = .097) between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Patellar resurfacing during knee reimplantation does not appear to meaningfully impact postoperative PROMs or survivorship. Given the risk of potential extensor mechanism complications with patellar resurfacing, surgeons may choose to leave the patella without an implant during total knee reimplantation and expect similar clinical outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Evaluating the "Patella-Friendly" Concept in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Minimum 15-Year Follow-Up Outcome Study Comparing Constant Radius, Multiradius Cruciate-Retaining, and Nonanatomical Cruciate-Retaining Implants

BACKGROUND

Patella-friendly femoral components were developed in order to reduce anterior knee pain and patellofemoral complications in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but their effect on long-term outcome is still unclear.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated prospectively collected data from 3 groups consisting of 100 patients (100 knees in each). In group A, the constant radius a-MP, in group B the multiradius cruciate-retaining Genesis II, and in group C the nonanatomic, multiradius, cruciate-retaining AGC TKA was implanted. Patients of all groups were matched for age, gender, side, body mass index, and length of follow-up. Preoperative and postoperative clinical outcome data in the form of Knee Society System (KSS), Short Form-12, Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index, and Oxford Knee Score were available at regular intervals for groups A and B. For patients of group C, KSS score data were available at the same time intervals. In all groups, the patellofemoral compartment was assessed using the Clinical Patella Score scale. Anterior knee pain, secondary patella resurfacing, implant failure, and radiological outcome were assessed in patients of all groups.

RESULTS

At 10-year and 15-year follow-up, patients of group A showed statistically significant (s.s.) higher (all P = .000) KSS values as compared to those of groups B and C. At 15-year follow-up, patients of group B showed s.s. higher (P = .001) KSS values as compared to those of group C. At 10-year and 15-year follow up, patients of group A showed s.s. higher (all P = .00) Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index and Oxford Knee Score values as compared to those of group B. At 15-year follow-up only, patients of group A showed s.s. higher (P = .00) Short Form-12 (physical) values as compared to those of group B. In terms of Clinical Patella Score, patients in group A had s.s. higher values (P = .05) when compared to those of groups B and C. Anterior knee pain was recorded in 4.4% of TKAs in group A, 7.5% in group B, and 17.2% in group C. One (1.1%) patient in group A, 3 (3.25%) in group B, and 7 (8%) in group C underwent secondary resurfacing.

CONCLUSION

Anatomical, patella-friendly, constant radius femoral components outperform others in reducing anterior knee pain and patella complications in TKA in which the patellae are left nonresurfaced.

Elevated Body Mass Index Is a Risk Factor for Failure to Achieve the Knee Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short Form Minimal Clinically Important Difference Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The aims of this study are (1) to assess the association between body mass index (BMI) and failure to achieve the 1-year Knee Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS) minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients and (2) to determine if there is a BMI threshold beyond which the risk of failing to achieve the MCID is significantly increased.

METHODS

A regional arthroplasty registry was queried for TKA patients from 2016 to 2019 with completion of preoperative and 1-year postoperative KOOS-PS. The MCID threshold was derived using a distribution-based approach. Demographic and patient-reported outcome measure variables were collected. BMI was analyzed continuously and categorically using cutoffs defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The association between failure to achieve 1-year MCID and BMI was analyzed using multiple logistic regression. A BMI threshold was determined using the Youden index and receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

In total, 1059 TKAs were analyzed. BMI assessed continuously was significantly associated with failure to achieve the KOOS-PS MCID (odds ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 1.00-1.05, P = .025). Analysis of BMI categorically revealed that "overweight" (25-30 kg/m²), "obese class I" (30-35 kg/m²), "obese class II" (35-40 kg/m²), and "obese class III" (>40 kg/m²) patients faced 77%, 76%, 83%, and 106% greater risk, respectively, of failing to achieve the KOOS-PS MCID compared to "normal BMI" (<25 kg/m²) patients.

CONCLUSION

Elevated BMI was associated with an increased risk of failure to achieve the 1-year KOOS-PS MCID following TKA.

Excellent 10-year patient-reported outcomes and survival in a single-radius, cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Over 2 million Triathlon single-radius total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) have been implanted worldwide. This study reports the 10-year survival and patient-reported outcome of the Triathlon TKA in a single independent centre.

METHODS

From 2006 to 2007, 462 consecutive cruciate-retaining Triathlon TKAs were implanted in 426 patients (median age 69 (21-89), 289 (62.5%) female). Patellae were not routinely resurfaced. Patient-reported outcome measures (SF-12, Oxford Knee Scores (OKS), satisfaction) were assessed preoperatively and at 1, 5 and 10 years when radiographs were reviewed. Forgotten Joint Scores (FJS) were collected at 10 years. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed.

RESULTS

At 10-11.6 years, 123 patients (128 TKAs) had died and 8 TKAs were lost to follow-up. There were four aseptic failures (two cases of tibial loosening, two cases of instability) and four septic failures requiring revision. Symptomatic aseptic radiographic loosening was present in three further cases at 11 years. Four (1%) patellae were secondarily resurfaced. OKS score improved by 17.7 ± 9.7 points at 1 year (p < 0.001), and was maintained at 34.7 ± 9.6 at 10 years with FJS 48.5 ± 31.4. Patient satisfaction was 88% at each timepoint. Ten-year survival was 97.9% (95% confidence interval 96.5-99.3) for revision for any reason, 98.9% (97.7-100) for mechanical failure, and 98.6% (97.4-99.8) for aseptic loosening (symptomatic radiographic or revised).

CONCLUSION

The Triathlon TKA continues to show excellent longer-term results with high implant survivorship, low rates of aseptic failure, consistently maintained PROMs and excellent patient satisfaction rates of 88% at 10 years.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II, Prospective cohort study.

Outcome Assessment in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal

BACKGROUND

The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) initiative developed a core outcome set (COS) of domains to assess effectiveness of interventions for knee osteoarthritis. These domains (pain, physical function, patient global assessment, imaging at 1 year) should be assessed in every trial to make research evidence meaningful and comparable. We systematically evaluated and critically appraised the use of measurement instruments and outcome domains in prospective studies evaluating patients with knee osteoarthritis undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and assessed their accordance with the OMERACT COS.

METHODS

Literature search was performed until August 26, 2014, in Medline and Embase. Clinical trials and prospective observational studies with ≥50 participants and a follow-up of ≥1 year were included. We collected general study characteristics, comprehensive information on measurement instruments, and corresponding domains used.

RESULTS

This systematic review identified low accordance of used outcome domains with the OMERACT COS of domains published in 1997. Only 4 of 100 included studies included all recommended core domains. Pain (85% of studies) and physical function (86%) were assessed frequently, whereas patient global assessment (21%) and joint imaging (≥1 year; 27%) were rarely assessed. There was substantial heterogeneity in the use of measurement instruments (n = 111) investigating TKA.

CONCLUSION

More efforts are required to implement the existing COS. In addition, a more consistent use of adequate measurement instruments is important to make research evidence on TKA more relevant, better comparable, and thus more useful for guideline developers and clinical decision makers.

Effect of patellar thickness on early results of total knee replacement with patellar resurfacing

PURPOSE

Patellar thickness is a concern in total knee replacement with patellar resurfacing because of the risk of patellar fracture or implant loosening. The aim of this study was to evaluate if patellar thickness is related to clinical outcome in the absence of patellar fracture or implant loosening.

METHODS

Early results of 169 patients who underwent total knee replacement with patellar resurfacing were reviewed to assess the effect of patellar thickness on clinical outcome. The mean follow-up was 13 months. The range of motion, Knee Society Score, Function Score and WOMAC Score were assessed preoperatively, at day 0, 6 months and 1 year. Radiographs were assessed for patellar fracture or implant loosening.

RESULTS

Thirty-one percent of all patients had preoperative thickness <21 mm. Seven percent had <12 mm residual thickness after patellar cut, all were female. Twenty-three percent had ≥1 mm increase of thickness after surgery. Radiographs did not show any patellar fracture or implant loosening. However, preoperative patellar thickness <21 mm had poorer gain in range of motion at 1 year. Preoperative range of motion had greater influence on postoperative range of motion than preoperative patellar thickness. Residual thickness <12 mm had lower gain in WOMAC score at 1 year and an increase in thickness ≥1 mm postoperatively was associated with lower gain in WOMAC score at 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Early results of patellar resurfacing with preoperative thickness <21 mm or residual thickness <12 mm were found to be inferior even in the absence of patellar fracture or implant loosening. Conservative cutting resulting in 1 mm increase in thickness was also found to have inferior clinical results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.