Midterm results of a femoral stem with a modular neck design: clinical outcomes and metal ion analysis

Fracture of femoral neck in modular total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Modular femoral stems have the advantage of anatomic hip reconstruction by restoring the femoral offset thus minimising the bearing surface wear, implant loosening and dislocation.

AIM

This study aims to investigate the existing literature on modular neck fractures, to identify predisposing factors and guide the decision-making process in the management of these difficult cases.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted until July 2022. PRISMA guidelines were followed, eligibility criteria were set, and methodology assessment of included studies was conducted based on MINORS criteria, size and primary outcome. Data were extracted and analysed thoroughly.

RESULTS

5657 studies were initially screened; the full texts of 124 records were assessed and finally, 32 reports were included. There were 7 clinical studies and 25 case reports. A total of 4825 patients (5204 hips) with a mean age 62.38 years and a mean BMI 29.06 kg/m2 were analysed in the 7 clinical studies. The reported overall weighted revision rate was 0.86%, while the weighted mean modular neck fracture rate was 0.26%. The usual history was sudden experience of hip pain and instability. The average time interval to neck fracture was 4.57 (range 3-4.7) years and a long modular neck was identified in 91.17% of them. Data from case reports showed a mean age and average BMI of 55.85 and 31.63 kg/m2. 82.35% of the patients were male. Necks were fractured after an average time interval of 64.5 ± 8.8 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of modular neck fracture is significant. The profile of a male, obese patient with a long modular neck increased risk of neck fracture. Microstructural investigation of the retrieved implants demonstrated a higher incidence of fracture line in the base of the neck junction and at its anterolateral distal part. Surgeons should be aware of this complication while using or revising such protheses.

Bimodular femoral stems in primary total hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

This review critically examines the efficacy of dual-modular stems in primary total hip arthroplasty. Given the variability and non-comparability of certain femoral stem designs and stem-neck couplings, with some even being withdrawn from the market, this review offers an in-depth analysis of predominant implant performances.

AREAS COVERED

The paper explores a brief historical summary related to dual-modular stems, including the complications associated with their use, diagnostic tools for evaluation, analysis of both recalled and currently available models, as well as alternative therapeutic options. This information is pertinent for both clinical and research domains.

EXPERT OPINION

While dual-modular systems were initially touted to offer several advantages, the evidence substantiating these benefits has been ambiguous. Further, these systems introduce the risk of alternative complications. In specific cases involving patients with developmental hip dysplasia and certain proximal femoral deformities requiring complex reconstructions, dual-modular systems might be relevant. Nonetheless, the use of long interchangeable necks in patients with a body mass index above 30 kg/m2 is discouraged, and pairing a long varus-oriented neck with an extra-long femoral head should be avoided in all patients.

Modular neck stems in total hip arthroplasty: current concepts

Modular neck (MN) implants can restore the anatomy, especially in deformed hips such as sequelae of development dysplasia.

Early designs for MN implants had problems with neck fractures and adverse local tissue, so their use was restricted to limited indications.

Results of the latest generation of MN prostheses seem to demonstrate that these problems have been at least mitigated.

Given the results of the studies presented in this review, surgeons might consider MN total hip arthroplasty (THA) for a narrower patient selection when a complex reconstruction is required.

Long MN THA should be avoided in case of body mass index > 30, and should be used with extreme caution in association with high offset femoral necks with long or extra-long heads. Cr-Co necks should be abandoned, in favour of a titanium alloy connection.

Restoring the correct anatomic femoral offset remains a challenge in THA surgeries.

MN implants have been introduced to try to solve this problem. The MN design allows surgeons to choose the appropriate degree and length of the neck for desired stability and range of motion.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:751-758. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200064

Dual Modular Titanium Alloy Femoral Stem Failure Mechanisms and Suggested Clinical Approaches

Titanium (Ti) alloys have been proven to be one of the most suitable materials for orthopaedic implants. Dual modular stems have been introduced to primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) to enable better control of the femoral offset, leg length, and hip stability. This systematic review highlights information acquired for dual modular Ti stem complications published in the last 12 years and offers a conclusive discussion of the gathered knowledge. Articles referring to dual modular stem usage, survivorship, and complications in English were searched from 2009 to the present day. A qualitative synthesis of literature was carried out, excluding articles referring solely to other types of junctions or problems with cobalt-chromium alloys in detail. In total, 515 records were identified through database searching and 78 journal articles or conference proceedings were found. The reasons for a modular neck fracture of a Ti alloy are multifactorial. Even though dual modular stems have not shown any clinical benefits for patients and have been associated with worse results regarding durability than monolithic stems, some designs are still marketed worldwide. Orthopaedic surgeons should use Ti6Al4V dual modular stem designs for primary THA in special cases only.

Systematic review of primary total hip arthroplasty using titanium-titanium modular-neck prostheses: the true risk of revision

AIMS

Modular-neck femoral implants are used to enable more variability in femoral neck version, offset and length. It has been reported that these implants carry a higher rate of revision. The aim of this review was to assess the overall and cause-specific revision rate of titanium-titanium alloy modular-neck implants in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines and utilising multiple databases. All results were screened for eligibility. Studies published from 2000 onwards, using a current-generation, titanium-titanium, modular-neck implant were included. Overall and cause-specific revision rates were analysed, comparing to fixed-neck prostheses where applicable.

RESULTS

920 studies were screened. After applying exclusion criteria, 23 were assessed in full and 14 included. These consisted of 12 case series and 2 joint registry analyses. 21,841 patients underwent a modular-neck implant with a weighted mean follow-up of 5.7 years, mean age of 62.4 years, and average body mass index (BMI) of 28.4kg/m². The overall revision rate was 3.95% and 2.98% for modular and fixed-neck prostheses, respectively. For studies with >5 years follow-up the mean revision rate was 3.08%. There was no difference in cause-specific revision rates by implant design. Mean improvement in Harris Hip Score was 41.9.

CONCLUSIONS

At medium-term, revision rates for titanium-titanium primary modular-neck THA are acceptable. These prostheses are a sensible management option in patients with considerable anatomical hip deformity not amenable to correction with standard fixed-neck implants. Patients of male gender, high BMI and requiring prostheses with a larger neck, offset or head are at higher risk of implant failure.

Femoral Stem Fracture in Hip Revision Arthroplasty: A Systematic Literature Review of the Real-World Evidence

Background Total hip arthroplasty (THA) presents as an excellent treatment for the osteoarthritic hip, demonstrating good survival rates. However, aseptic loosening and infection are the main causes of operative revision. The methods used in revision surgery are non-modular or modular THA implants. In addition to the abovementioned revision reasons for THA, this treatment could be associated with the possibility of femoral stem fracture, especially in the modular system. The topic of material failure has been focused on in the public media. The question arises as to how such media reports correlate with the published literature. The observed mentioned number of cases concerning a femoral stem fracture vary between one single case and up to 18.5% within a clinical study, thus presenting an inhomogeneous data situation with a large span. The specific aim of this systematic review is to establish facts and clarify the number of unforeseen events of a femoral stem fracture based on peer review articles and registry data. This clarification is important to us, as these media reports have led to uncertainty among patients.

Methods A systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Peer review articles in English and German, presenting original articles, meta-analyses, or case reports, were searched from the turn of the millennium up to December 2019. Only articles that reported a femoral stem component fracture, with content of clinical data as well as register data, were included. Relevant papers published after the defined research time frame were taken into account within the discussion.

Results In total, 218 fractures of a femoral stem (141 primary and 77 revision THA) component could be identified within the selected literature. Most cases of a femoral stem fracture occurred in the modular THA implants compared to the non-modular stems. Regarding revision THA, in summary, 77 implants, presenting 23 non-modular and 54 modular implants, failed by means of femoral stem fracture. A review of 11 National Joint Registries shows a revision rate between 0.04 and 0.05% in only 2 registers according to the specific subject of a femoral stem fracture. For the remaining 9 registers, however, detailed information is lacking and only nonspecific information such as a generic “implant failure” or “other reason” (which can cover a multitude of causes) is supplied.

Conclusion A femoral stem fracture presents a devastating complication for the patient, the surgeon as well as for the manufacturer of the implant. Modular THA implants play an increasingly valuable role concerning restoration of individual anatomy in modern THA revision surgery, especially within complex cases. Regarding revision procedures, data suggests a lower risk of femoral stem fracture for modular implants compared to primary procedures, while the risk of fracture for non-modular implants seems to increase during revision. Ultimately, it cannot be proven whether this is actually applicable, since the absolute number of implanted prosthesis systems is not known. Various implant-, patient-, and surgeon-related factors may lead to these reported femoral stem fractures. However, this systematic review suggests that this is, in general, a rare complication.

Sensitivity and Specificity of Serum and Synovial Fluid Markers in Diagnosis of Infection in Head-Neck Taper Corrosion of Metal-On-Polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The accurate diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in the setting of adverse local tissue reactions in patients with metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) total hip arthroplasty (THA) secondary to head-neck taper junction corrosion is challenging as it frequently has the appearance of purulence. The aim of this study is to evaluate the utility of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and synovial fluid markers in diagnosing PJI in failed MoP THA due to head-neck taper corrosion.

METHODS

A total of 89 consecutive patients with MoP THA with head-neck taper corrosion in 2 groups was evaluated: (1) infection group (n = 11) and (2) noninfection group (n = 78). All patients had highly crossed polyethylene with cobalt chromium femoral heads and had preoperative synovial fluid aspiration. In addition, serum cobalt and chromium levels were analyzed.

RESULTS

The optimal cutoff value for synovial white blood cell was 2144 with 93% sensitivity and 84% specificity. Neutrophil count optimal cutoff value was 82% with 93% sensitivity and 82% specificity. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of ESR and CRP determined optimal cutoff at 57 mm/h and 35 mg/L with 57% sensitivity and 94% specificity and 93% sensitivity and 76% specificity, respectively. There were no significant differences in metal ion levels between the infected and noninfected groups.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that ESR and CRP are useful in excluding PJI, whereas both synovial white blood cell count and neutrophil percentage in hip aspirate are useful markers for diagnosing infection in MoP THA patients with head-neck taper corrosion associated adverse local tissue reaction.

How to proceed with asymptomatic modular dual taper hip stems in the case of acetabular revision

How to proceed with a clinically asymptomatic modular Metha® Ti alloy stem with dual taper CoCr neck adapter in case of acetabular revision? To systematically answer this question the status of research and appropriate diagnostic methods in context to clinically symptomatic and asymptomatic dual taper stem-neck couplings has been evaluated based on a systematic literature review. A retrieval analysis of thirteen Metha® modular dual taper CoCr/Ti alloy hip stems has been performed and a rational decision making model as basis for a clinical recommendation was developed. From our observations we propose that in cases of acetabular revision, that for patients with a serum cobalt level of > 4 µg/L and a Co/Cr ratio > 3.6, the revision of the modular dual taper stem may be considered. Prior to acetabular revision surgery a systematic diagnostic evaluation should be executed, using specific tests such as serum metal (Co, Cr) ion analysis, plain antero-posterior and lateral radiographs and cross-sectional imaging modalities (Metal Artefact Reduction Sequence Magnetic Resonance Imaging). For an asymptomatic Metha® dual taper Ti alloy/CoCr stem-neck coupling at the stage of acetabular revision careful clinical decision making according to the proposed model should be followed and overreliance on any single examination should be avoided, considering the complete individual differential diagnosis and patient situation.

High Failure at a Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Modular Femoral Trunnion

BACKGROUND

Modular femoral trunnions enable the surgeon to independently adjust offset, leg length, and anteversion in total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, modularity may result in an increased risk of fretting and corrosion along with a higher risk of implant dissociation or fracture. The purpose of this study is to evaluate mid-term survivorship of THAs using a cementless modular system.

METHODS

A consecutive series of 221 patients who underwent a primary THA using the ALFA II modular stem by a single surgeon between 2002 and 2004 were reviewed. Survivorship of the ALFA II modular hip system was evaluated at a minimum of 5 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

Of the 221 patients, 28 (12.7%) died from causes unrelated to the surgery before adequate follow-up, and 64 (29.0%) patients were lost to follow-up. The remaining 129 patients had a mean 6.5-year (range: 5-8 years) follow-up. All-cause survivorship of the modular stem system was 81% (95% confidence interval = 69-90) at a mean 6.5-year follow-up. Of the 25 (19.4%) cases requiring revision surgery, 52.0% was for dissociation of the modular components, 32.0% was for fracture of the prosthesis, 12.0% was for instability/multiple dislocations, and 4.0% was for chronic septic THA. Body mass index (odds ratio = 1.080) and offset (odds ratio = 1.254) were independent risk factors for mechanical failures of the modular stem system.

CONCLUSION

The modular stem hip system of interest in this study demonstrates a high failure rate at mid-term follow-up, and we caution against the use of similar designs in primary THAs.

What Factors Are Associated With Neck Fracture in One Commonly Used Bimodular THA Design? A Multicenter, Nationwide Study in Slovenia

BACKGROUND

Femoral stems with bimodular (head-neck as well as neck-body) junctions were designed to help surgeons address patients' hip anatomy individually. However, arthroplasty registers have reported higher revision rates in stems with bimodular junctions than in stems with modularity limited to the head-neck trunnion. However, to our knowledge, no epidemiologic study has identified patient-specific risk factors for modular femoral neck fractures, and some stems using these designs still are produced and marketed.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The purposes of this study were (1) to establish the survival rate free from aseptic loosening of one widely used bimodular THA design; (2) to define the proportion of patients who experienced a fracture of the stem's modular femoral neck; and (3) to determine factors associated with neck fracture.

METHODS

In this retrospective, nationwide, multicenter study, we reviewed 2767 bimodular Profemur® Z stems from four hospitals in Slovenia with a mean followup of 8 years (range, 3 days to 15 years). Between 2002 and 2015, the four participating hospitals performed 26,132 primary THAs; this implant was used in 2767 of them (11%). The general indications for using this implant were primary osteoarthritis (OA) in 2198 (79%) hips and other indications in 569 (21%) hips. We followed patients from the date of the index operation to the date of death, date of revision, or the end of followup on March 1, 2018. We believe that all revisions would be captured in our sample, except for patients who may have emigrated outside the country, but the proportion of people immigrating to Slovenia is higher than the proportion of those emigrating from it; however, no formal accounting for loss to followup is possible in a study of this design. There were 1438 (52%) stems implanted in female and 1329 (48%) in male patients, respectively. A titanium alloy neck was used in 2489 hips (90%) and a cobalt-chromium neck in 278 (10%) hips. The mean body mass index (BMI) at the time of operation was 29 kg/m (SD ± 5 kg/m). We used Kaplan-Meier analysis to establish survival rates, and we performed a chart review to determine the proportion of patients who experienced femoral neck fractures. A binary logistic regression model that controlled for the potential confounding variables of age, sex, BMI, time since implantation, type of bearing, diagnosis, hospital, neck length, and neck material was used to analyze neck fractures.

RESULTS

There were 55 (2%) aseptic stem revisions. Survival rate free from aseptic loosening at 12 years was 97% (95% confidence interval [CI] ± 1%). Fracture of the modular neck occurred in 23 patients (0.83%) with a mean BMI of 29 kg/m (SD ± 4 kg/m.) Twenty patients with neck fractures were males and 19 of 23 fractured necks were long. Time since implantation (odds ratio [OR], 0.55; 95% CI 0.46-0.66; p < 0.001), a long neck (OR, 6.77; 95% CI, 2.1-22.2; p = 0.002), a cobalt-chromium alloy neck (OR, 5.7; 95% CI, 1.6-21.1; p = 0.008), younger age (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.86-0.96; p < 0.001), and male sex (OR, 3.98; 95% CI, 1.04-14.55; p = 0.043) were factors associated with neck fracture.

CONCLUSIONS

The loosening and neck fracture rates of the Profemur® Z stem were lower than in some of previously published series. However, the use of modular femoral necks in primary THA increases the risk for neck fracture, particularly in young male patients with cobalt-chromium long femoral necks. The bimodular stem we analyzed fractured unacceptably often, especially in younger male patients. For most patients, the risks of using this device outweigh the benefits, and several dozen patients had revisions and complications they would not have had if a different stem had been used.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Outcomes of neck modularity in total hip arthroplasty: an Italian perspective

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to conduct a systematic review of clinical outcomes and complications of modular neck THA among Italian cohorts.

METHODS

Only reviewed publications focused on Italian cohort patients in English language were considered for inclusion. Studies were included if they involved patients who underwent total hip replacement surgery with modular necks, and reported aetiology or survival rate or bone stability or clinical scores or complications.

RESULTS

The studies included in our search reported data on 3714 patients and 3856 hips. Most of the studies were from high-volume surgery centres. The most frequent diagnosis was osteoarthritis that occurred in 2910 cases (75.9%). The average survival rate and average bone stability were 97.20% and 99.37%, respectively. The average HHS improved from 42.1 prior to surgery to 89.52 after surgery. Studies included in our search reported 40 complications. The most frequently reported complication was dislocation (40%).

CONCLUSION

This review showed excellent survival rate and bone stability and good clinical outcomes in Italian cohort patients treated with modular neck THA, and these clinical results are comparable with international cohort rates. This review suggests that modular implants represent a very satisfying choice when practised by expert orthopaedic joint surgeons.

Modular femoral neck failure after revision of a total hip arthroplasty: a finite element analysis

The authors report on a case of modular femoral neck fracture which appeared 21 months after revision of acetabular component. The revision surgery was performed 8 years after the primary total hip arthroplasty due to aseptic loosening of the acetabular component. During acetabular revision, the primary implanted short (S, - 3.5 mm) femoral head was also exchanged with extra-long (XL, + 7.0 mm) femoral head fitting the modular femoral neck with a longer lever arm. Numerical analysis has shown that this has resulted in a 19.9% increase in tensile stress at the neck-stem coupling during normal walking cycle. This could result in microcrack initiation and propagation and finally lead to modular neck failure of the otherwise well-fixed stem. Surgeons should avoid excessive loading of the exchangeable neck (dual-modular) femoral stem designs as the stem-neck couplings are subject to corrosion and are not as reliable as monoblock stems.

Withdrawn: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Modular and Nonmodular Neck Versions of a Titanium Stem

This article has been withdrawn at the request of the author(s) and/or editor. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal.

The Fate of Elevated Metal Ion Levels After Revision Surgery for Head-Neck Taper Corrosion in Patients With Metal-on-Polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Elevated metal ion levels have been associated with the presence of adverse local tissue reactions in patients with metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) total hip arthroplasty (THA) secondary to corrosion at head-neck taper junction. Patients are frequently concerned with their elevated systemic metal ion levels. This study investigated the rate of decline of serum cobalt and chromium ion levels after revision surgery.

METHODS

A total of 39 patients with MoP THA were revised because of the presence of symptomatic adverse local tissue reactions on magnetic resonance imaging with elevated serum metal ion levels. The time between initial implantation of MoP THA (index surgery) and revision surgery was considered the duration of metal exposure. The prerevision measure of ion level was considered the intensity of exposure. Prerevision median serum Co and Cr levels, as well as revision serum Co/Cr ratio, were reported.

RESULTS

The median serum levels of cobalt and cobalt-to-chromium ratio significantly decreased from prerevision levels of 8.2 μg/L (0.2-56.1 μg/L) and 5.6 μg/L (0.1-53.3 μg/L) to 3.1 μg/L (0.2-14 μg/L) and 1.7 μg/L (0.4-3.8 μg/L) at postrevision (P < .01), respectively. The rate of decline of Co was 0.45% per day during the first month. For chromium, the rate of decline was slower with 0.08% per day during the first month.

CONCLUSION

At 3 months after revision surgery, cobalt and chromium ion levels declined by 34% and 8% of prerevision level, respectively. This study provides evidence-based practical information for surgeons to provide MoP THA patients when considering revision surgery for head-neck taper corrosion.

Dual-taper modular hip implant: Investigation of 3-dimensional surface scans for component contact, shape, and fit

Background

The etiology of wear particle generation and subsequent corrosion in modular total hip arthroplasty implants likely begins with mechanical fretting. The purpose of this study was to determine geometric features of the male and female taper surfaces that drive stability within the neck-stem junction.

Methods

Eighteen modular hip components received 3-dimensional surface scans to examine the neck-stem taper junction using an optical scanner. The normal distance between the surfaces of the neck taper as seated in the stem slot was measured and produced a color map of the contact proximity. Contour plots identified surface shape variation and contact. Angle measurements and neck seated depth were analyzed by regression.

Results

The typical features observed were (1) a vertical line of contact at one end of the transition from the flat surface to the radius surface; (2) a vertical line of contact in the radius surface just past the centerline; (3) a concavity along the flat surface between the neck and stem components; and (4) one of the neck flat surfaces was closer to its mating surface on the stem. The seated depth of the neck was dependent on the taper angles in the flat section of the neck (R² = 0.5000, P = .0332).

Conclusions

The shape of the neck and stem tapers deviate from ideal design dimensions, contributing to relative motions between the neck and stem. While these processes are not proven to directly cause implant failure, they may place the implants at higher risk for failure.

Midterm outcomes of titanium modular femoral necks in total hip arthroplasty

Background

Modular femoral necks present surgical and biomechanical advantages in total hip arthroplasty (THA), but their benefits remain controversial due to risks of corrosion and fracture at the additional junction. This study aimed to report 10-year survival and clinical outcomes of a titanium femoral stem with a titanium modular neck in consecutive series.

Methods

The authors reviewed the records of 97 patients (99 THAs) using uncemented modular stem and ceramic-on-ceramic acetabular components. Patients were evaluated at minimum follow-up of 5 years using the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Postel Merle-D'Aubigné score (PMA). Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method with any reoperation or revision as endpoint.

Results

From the original cohort, 14 patients died, 6 were lost to follow-up, and 5 had revision operations with exchange of the femoral stem. The KM survival at 10 years was 94.2% (CI, 86.5-97.5). Clinical assessment was performed on 67 of the 72 patients (69 of the 74 hips) presently living with their original THA components. At mean follow-up of 9.4±1.0 years (median, 10; range, 5-11), the HHS was 93.6±8.2 and the PMA score 17.0±1.6. The X-rays revealed no signs of adverse reactions or bone loss.

Conclusions

The uncemented titanium hip stem with modular titanium neck provided a satisfactory 10-year survival and clinical outcomes. Neck modularity enabled restoration of patient-specific femoral offset and limb length thanks to five possible neck configurations, though greater follow up is required to confirm the long-term benefits and safety of this design concept.

Serum Metal Levels for Diagnosis of Adverse Local Tissue Reactions Secondary to Corrosion in Metal-on-Polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Recently, corrosion at the head-neck junction in metal-on-polyethylene bearing surface total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been recognized as a cause of adverse local tissue reactions (ALTRs). Serum metal levels have been advocated as a tool for the diagnosis of ALTR; however, no prior studies have specifically examined their utility. The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal cutoff values for serum cobalt and chromium levels in diagnosing ALTR after metal-on-polyethylene bearing surface THA.

METHODS

We reviewed 447 consecutive patients with serum metal levels tested at our institution and identified 64 patients with a metal-on-polyethylene bearing who had axial imaging or underwent reoperation to confirm the presence or absence of ALTR. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were produced to identify cutoff thresholds to optimize sensitivity, and diagnostic test performance was characterized.

RESULTS

Forty-four of the 64 patients (69%) were positive for an ALTR. The best test for the diagnosis of ALTR was the serum cobalt level (area under the curve [AUC] = 99%). A threshold cutoff of ≥1.0 ng/mL had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 90%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 96%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 100%. Serum chromium levels were also diagnostic (AUC = 87%). A threshold cutoff of ≥0.15 ng/mL had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 50%, PPV of 81%, and NPV of 100%. Finally, serum cobalt-to-chromium ratio was also helpful for diagnosis (AUC = 90%). A threshold cutoff value of 1.4 for the cobalt-to-chromium ratio offered a sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 70%, PPV of 87%, and NPV of 82%.

CONCLUSION

Measurement of serum cobalt level with a threshold value of 1.0 ng/mL in our experience is the best test for identifying the presence of ALTR in patients with a metal-on-polyethylene THA. Measurement of chromium level and the ratio of cobalt-to-chromium levels are also of value.

Exchangeable Femoral Neck (Dual-Modular) THA Prostheses Have Poorer Survivorship Than Other Designs: A Nationwide Cohort of 324,108 Patients

BACKGROUND

Exchangeable neck stems, defined as those with a dual taper (that is, a modular junction between the femoral head and the femoral neck and an additional junction between the neck and the stem body), were introduced in THA to improve restoration of joint biomechanics (restoring anteversion, offset, and limb length) and reduce the risk of dislocation. However exchangeable necks have been reported to result in adverse effects such as stem fractures and acute local tissue reaction. Whether they result in a net improvement to or impairment of reconstructive survivorship remains controversial.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) To compare the prosthetic survivorship and all-cause revision risk of exchangeable femoral neck THAs versus fixed neck THAs, taking known prosthetic revision risk factors into account; and (2) to compare the cause-specific revision risk of exchangeable femoral neck THAs versus fixed neck THAs, adjusting for known prosthetic risk factors.

METHODS

Using French national health-insurance databases, we identified all French patients older than 40 years who underwent primary THA from 2009 through 2012. To ensure accuracy of the data, we considered only beneficiaries of the general insurance scheme (approximately 77% of the population). Characteristics of the prosthesis and the patients receiving an exchangeable femoral neck THA were compared with those receiving a fixed femoral neck THA (defined as femoral stem with only the head being exchangeable). Revision was the event of interest. Followup started on the date the THA was performed, until the patient experienced revision, died, was lost to followup, or until the followup period ended (December 31, 2014), whichever came first. Competing risk THA survivorship was calculated and compared (purpose 1), as were cause-specific Cox regression models (purpose 2). The study cohort included 324,108 individuals with a mean age of 77 years. A total of 24% underwent THA for acute trauma, and 3% of the group received an exchangeable neck THA. During the median 45-month followup (mean, 42 months; minimum, 1 day; maximum, 6 years), 11,968 individuals underwent prosthetic revision.

RESULTS

The cumulative revision incidence was 6.5% (95% CI, 5.8%-7.3%) for exchangeable neck THAs versus 4.7% (95% CI, 4.6%-4.8%) for fixed neck THAs (p < 0.001). After controlling for potential confounding variables including age, sex, comorbidities, indication for THA, cementation, bearing surface, and the characteristics of the center where the implantation was performed, we found that the exchangeable femoral neck THA was associated with an increased hazard ratio (HR) of revision of 1.26 (95% CI, 1.14-1.38; p < 0.001) compared with the fixed neck THA. When dealing with cause-specific revision, exchangeable neck THAs had a higher incidence of revision for implant failure or periprosthetic fracture, and for mechanical complications; adjusted HRs were, respectively, 1.68 (95% CI, 1.24-2.27; p < 0.001) and 1.27 (95% CI, 1.13-1.43; p < 0.001), for exchangeable neck THAs compared with fixed ones.

CONCLUSIONS

Exchangeable neck THAs had poorer survivorship independent of other prosthetic revision risk factors. Accordingly, expected anatomic and functional benefits should be carefully assessed before choosing this design.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Retrieval Analysis of Neck-Stem Coupling in Modular Hip Prostheses

BACKGROUND

Dual-taper modular stems have suffered from high revision rates caused by adverse local tissue reactions secondary to fretting and corrosion. We compared the fretting and corrosion behavior of a group of modular neck designs to that of a design that had been recalled for risks associated with fretting and corrosion at the modular neck junction.

METHODS

We previously analyzed fretting and corrosion on 60 retrieved Rejuvenate modular neck-stem implants. Here we compare those results to results from 26 retrieved implants from 7 other modular neck designs. For the 26 additional cases, histology slides of tissue collected at revision were reviewed and graded for aseptic lymphocyte-dominated vasculitis-associated lesion (ALVAL). Multivariate analyses were performed to assess differences in fretting and corrosion, adjusting for confounding factors (eg, length of implantation).

RESULTS

The Rejuvenate design had higher damage and corrosion scores than the other 7 designs (P < .01). Histologic samples from the recalled design were 20 times more likely to show ALVAL than samples from the other designs (P < .01). Mixed metal couples had higher fretting (P < .01) and corrosion (P = .02) scores than non-mixed metal couples.

CONCLUSION

Fretting and corrosion occurred on all modular neck-stem retrievals regardless of design. However, mixed metal couples suffered more corrosion than homogenous couples. This may be due to the lower modulus of the titanium alloy used for the stem, allowing for increased metal transfer and surface damage when loaded against a cobalt alloy modular neck, which in turn could account for the higher ALVAL and corrosion scores. Due to increased corrosion risk with mixed metals and increased neck fracture risk with non-mixed metal stem and necks, we suggest that clinicians avoid implantation of modular neck-stem systems.

Metal ion levels in ceramic-on-ceramic THR with cobalt-chrome modular necks: analysis of cobalt and chromium serum levels in 23 healthy hip patients

BACKGROUND

Modular necks in total hip replacement (THR) can be a source of metal ion release.

METHODS

We measured the level of cobalt (Co) and chromium (Cr) ions in the serum of 23 healthy volunteers with a well-functioning ceramic-on-ceramic THR of a particular design, containing a cobalt-chrome (Co-Cr) stem and a Co-Cr modular neck.

RESULTS

Average Co in serum was 1,71 µg/l; median Co was 1.50 µg/l. No patient had Co levels higher than 3.70 µg/l. Average Cr level was 0.49 µg/l; in all but one patient Cr was below the detection limit (<0.50 µg/l). Co was higher for varus necks compared to all other subtypes: 2.14 µg/l vs 1.58 µg/l (p<0.05). The same system with Titanium modular necks shows lower Co serum levels: 1.26 µg/l (p<0.01 ). In conclusion, the hybrid THR Profemur Xm® - Procotyle L® with a Co-Cr modular neck on a Co-Cr stem design shows very low Cr ion serum levels in a randomly selected group of well-functioning hip patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Co ion serum levels are low, but significantly higher for 8° varus necks, and Co levels are significantly higher than values of this system with a Titanium modular neck.

Modular neck total hip arthroplasty - a perfect storm

PURPOSE

This study was aimed to highlight neck notching as a potential cause of failure in modular neck total hip arthroplasty. It aimed to identify both the combination of modular components that place patients at greatest risk of failure and the potential mechanism for failure.

METHODS

This study involved a retrospective review of 301 total hip arthroplasties (THA) using Kinectiv modular neck Technology (Zimmer, Warsaw, Indiana). The primary outcome was the presence of neck notching requiring revision. Patient records, operative notes and postoperative radiographs were reviewed. A statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 301 THA were performed on 290 patients. There were 7 failures (2.3%). All 7 failures involved a modular combination of an anteverted neck, extended offset and length code -8 (failure rate of 36.8%, p&lt;0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified femoral neck notching as a potential cause of failure in modular neck THA. The combination of an anteverted neck, extended offset and length code -8 was associated with a high rate of neck notching using the Kinectiv modular neck Technology (Zimmer, Warsaw, Indiana). Based on our experience with this prosthesis we advise caution when using this particular combination of implants.

Effect of trunnion roughness and length on the modular taper junction strength under typical intraoperative assembly forces

Modular hip implants are at risk of fretting-induced postoperative complications most likely initiated by micromotion between adjacent implant components. A stable fixation between ball head and stem-neck taper is critical to avoid excessive interface motions. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify the effect of trunnion roughness and length on the modular taper strength under typical intraoperative assembly forces. Custom-made Titanium trunnions (standard/mini taper, smooth/grooved surface finish) were assembled with modular Cobalt-chromium heads by impaction with peak forces ranging from 2kN to 6kN. After each assembly process these were disassembled with a materials testing machine to detect the pull-off force as a measure for the taper strength. As expected, the pull-off forces increased with rising peak assembly force (p < 0.001). For low and moderate assembly forces, smooth standard tapers offered higher pull-off forces compared to grooved tapers (p < 0.038). In the case of an assembly force of 2kN, mini tapers showed a higher taper strength than standard ones (p=0.037). The results of this study showed that smooth tapers provided a higher strength for taper junctions. This higher taper strength may reduce the risk of fretting-related complications especially in the most common range of intraoperative assembly forces.

High serum ion levels in Conserve Plus big femoral head cemented total hip arthroplasty

AIM

We report the short-term clinical, radiographic and ion level data of the Conserve Plus metal-on-metal (MoM) big femoral head (BFH) total hip arthroplasty (THA), used with a cemented cobalt-chrome (Co-Cr) Profemur Xm stem and a titanium (Ti) modular neck.

RESULTS

In a consecutive series of 40 hips, survivorship at 3 years was 92.5% with revision for any reason. Average Harris Hip Score was 91.3. There were no implant loosenings. No osteolysis was observed. 5 patients had signs of adverse local tissue reaction (ALTR); their clinical scores were not different from the whole cohort. All but 1 patient had their Co serum ion levels measured. The average Co level was 14,1 µg/l (range 0.9-29.0; median 13.0 µg/l). Clinical scores did not correlate with ion level data. A comparative group of 42 hip resurfacing arthroplasties from the same manufacturer had significantly lower serum Co levels: 1.51 µg/l (range 0.9-4.0; median 0.9 µg/l).

CONCLUSIONS

All patients with the MoM BFH THA design should be followed regularly and should have ion level testing.

Metal ion levels in ceramic-on-ceramic THR with modular necks: analysis of cobalt and chromium serum levels in 30 healthy hip patients

BACKGROUND

Modular necks in total hip replacement (THR) can be a source of metal ion release. There are no data to date on the level of cobalt and chromium ions in the serum of patients with a cobalt-chrome stem and a titanium modular neck.

METHODS

Serum ion levels were measured in healthy volunteers with a well-functioning ceramic-on-ceramic THR.

RESULTS

Average cobalt in serum was 1.21 µg/l for unilateral THR and 2.2 µg/l for bilateral THR. No patient had cobalt levels higher than 2.4 µg/l. No patient had measurable chromium levels. There were no differences in cobalt levels for hips with short necks versus hips with long necks.

CONCLUSIONS

The hybrid THR Profemur® Xm - Procotyl® L with a titanium modular neck on a cobalt-chrome stem design shows no signs of abnormal toxic ion levels (cobalt or chromium) in a randomly selected group of well-functioning hip patients.

Histopathological characterization of corrosion product associated adverse local tissue reaction in hip implants: a study of 285 cases

Background

Adverse local tissue reaction (ALTR), characterized by a heterogeneous cellular inflammatory infiltrate and the presence of corrosion products in the periprosthetic soft tissues, has been recognized as a mechanism of failure in total hip replacement (THA). Different histological subtypes may have unique needs for longitudinal clinical follow-up and complication rates after revision arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to describe the histological patterns observed in the periprosthetic tissue of failed THA in three different implant classes due to ALTR and their association with clinical features of implant failure.

Methods

Consecutive patients presenting with ALTR from three major hip implant classes (N = 285 cases) were identified from our prospective Osteolysis Tissue Database and Repository. Clinical characteristics including age, sex, BMI, length of implantation, and serum metal ion levels were recorded. Retrieved synovial tissue morphology was graded using light microscopy. Clinical characteristics and features of synovial tissue analysis were compared between the three implant classes. Histological patterns of ALTR identified from our observations and the literature were used to classify each case. The association between implant class and histological patterns was compared.

Results

Our histological analysis demonstrates that ALTR encompasses three main histological patterns: 1) macrophage predominant, 2) mixed lymphocytic and macrophagic with or without features of associated with hypersensitivity/allergy or response to particle toxicity (eosinophils/mast cells and/or lymphocytic germinal centers), and 3) predominant sarcoid-like granulomas. Implant classification was associated with histological pattern of failure, and the macrophagic predominant pattern was more common in implants with metal-on-metal bearing surfaces (MoM HRA and MoM LHTHA groups). Duration of implantation and composition of periprosthetic cellular infiltrates was significantly different amongst the three implant types examined suggesting that histopathological features of ALTR may explain the variability of clinical implant performance in these cases.

Conclusions

ALTR encompasses a diverse range of histological patterns, which are reflective of both the implant configuration independent of manufacturer and clinical features such as duration of implantation. The macrophagic predominant pattern and its mechanism of implant failure represent an important subgroup of ALTR which could become more prominent with increased length of implantation.

Revision for taper corrosion at the neck-body junction following total hip arthroplasty: pearls and pitfalls

The management of the patient with a recalled, modular neck-body total hip arthroplasty can be complex, as it involves a combination of clinical, technical, and medicolegal challenges. Management begins with a thorough history and physical exam, radiographic evaluation, infection workup, and serum metal ion levels. Three-dimensional imaging is obtained based on patient symptomatology and metal ion levels and is used to evaluate for the presence of an adverse local tissue response as well as the integrity of the existing soft tissue envelope. The decision to perform revision surgery is based on a combination of patient symptomatology, laboratory values, and imaging findings. Revision surgery involves the entire armamentarium of femoral revision techniques, and the acetabulum may need to be revised at the surgeon's discretion. The femoral implant can often be removed without disrupting the femoral bone envelope; however, the surgeon should have a low threshold to perform an extended trochanteric osteotomy.

High Risk of Failure With Bimodular Femoral Components in THA

BACKGROUND

The bimodular femoral neck implant (modularity in the neck section and prosthetic head) offers several implant advantages to the surgeon performing THAs, however, there have been reports of failure of bimodular femoral implants involving neck fractures or adverse tissue reaction to metal debris. We aimed to assess the results of the bimodular implants used in the THAs we performed.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We asked: (1) What is the survivorship of the PROFEMUR(®) bimodular femoral neck stems? (2) What are the modes of failure of this bimodular femoral neck implant? (3) What are the major risk factors for the major modes of failure of this device?

METHODS

Between 2003 and 2009, we used one family of bimodular femoral neck stems for all primary THAs (PROFEMUR(®) Z and PROFEMUR(®) E). During this period, 277 THAs (in 242 patients) were performed with these implants. One hundred seventy were done with the bimodular PROFEMUR(®) E (all are accounted for here), and when that implant was suspected of having a high risk of failure, the bimodular PROFEMUR(®) Z was used instead. One hundred seven THAs were performed using this implant (all are accounted for in this study). All bearing combinations, including metal-on-metal, metal-on-polyethylene, and ceramic-on-ceramic, are included here. Data for the cohort included patient demographics, BMI, implant dimensions, type of articular surface, length of followup, and C-reactive protein serum level. We assessed survivorship of the two stems using Kaplan-Meier curves and determined the frequency of the different modes of stem failure. For each of the major modes of failure, we performed binary logistic regression to identify associated risk factors.

RESULTS

Survivorship of the stems, using aseptic revision as the endpoint, was 85% for the patients with the PROFEMUR(®) E stems with a mean followup of 50 months (range, 1-125 months) and 85% for the PROFEMUR(®) Z with a mean followup of 50 months (range, 1-125 months)(95% CI, 74-87 months). The most common modes of failure were loosening (9% for the PROFEMUR(®) E), neck fracture (6% for the PROFEMUR(®) Z and 0.6% for the PROFEMUR(®) E), metallosis (1%), and periprosthetic fracture (1%). Only the bimodular PROFEMUR(®) E was associated with femoral stem loosening (odds ratio [OR] =1.1; 95% CI, 1.04-1.140; p = 0.032). Larger head (OR = 3.2; 95% CI, 0.7-14; p = 0.096), BMI (OR = 1.19; 95% CI, 1-1.4; p = 0.038) and total offset (OR = 1.83; 95% CI, 1.13-2.9; p = 0.039) were associated with neck fracture.

CONCLUSION

Bimodular neck junctions may be potentiated by long neck lengths, greater offset, and larger head diameters. These factors may contribute to bimodular neck failure by creating a larger moment about the neck's insertion in the stem. The PROFEMUR(®) E implant is associated with high periprosthetic loosening. Based on our experience we cannot recommend the use of bimodular femoral neck implants.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Diagnosis and Management of Adverse Local Tissue Reactions Secondary to Corrosion at the Head-Neck Junction in Patients With Metal on Polyethylene Bearings

We reviewed 27 patients who underwent revision for an adverse local tissue reaction (ALTR) secondary to corrosion at the head-neck junction with MoP bearings. Serum cobalt and chromium levels were elevated in all cases, with a mean cobalt of 11.2 ppb and chromium of 2.2 ppb. Patients underwent modular bearing exchange, including a ceramic head with a titanium sleeve in 23 of 27 cases with only one recurrence of ALTR in one of the four patients not treated with a ceramic head. The diagnosis of ALTR secondary to corrosion is associated with cobalt levels of >1 ppb with cobalt levels elevated above chromium. Retention of a well-fixed stem and modular exchange to a ceramic head leads to resolution of symptoms and decreases in metal levels.

Long-term survivorship and complication rate comparison of a cementless modular stem and cementless fixed neck stems for primary total hip replacement

PURPOSE

Modular necks used in total hip replacement (THR) have become an increasingly discussed topic with the recent recall of multiple modular systems, but it is anticipated that outcomes for these devices are highly design-specific. The objectives of this study were to determine if the survivorship and complication rates of a specific modular femoral stem (PROFEMUR® Z, MicroPort Orthopedics Inc., Arlington, TN, USA) were significantly lower than those of all cementless fixed neck stems in an arthroplasty registry.

METHODS

The database of an arthroplasty registry was searched for all patients implanted with a specific modular stem and all those implanted with cementless fixed neck stems. Kaplan-Meier survivorship and complication rates were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The 12-year survivorship of the modular stem (95.8%) was not significantly less than that of all cementless fixed neck stems (96.1%). There was also no difference in revision rates for dislocation, periprosthetic fractures, aseptic loosening or septic loosening between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the specific modular stem did not adversely affect long-term component survivorship or complication rates when compared to all cementless fixed neck THRs in an arthroplasty registry.