Risk Factors for Subsidence of a Modular Tapered Femoral Stem Used for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

Subsidence of a Single-Taper Femoral Stem in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Characterization, Associated Factors, and Sequelae

BACKGROUND

We characterized subsidence of an uncemented single-taper femoral stem in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), determined factors associated with subsidence, and evaluated the impact of subsidence on outcome.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 502 primary THAs performed using a single-taper stem in Dorr type A and B femora between 2014 and 2018. Subsidence was measured based on distance from the greater trochanter to stem shoulder on calibrated X-rays. Demographics, case-specific data, and outcomes were collected. Changes in subsidence and variables associated with subsidence were determined.

RESULTS

Stem subsidence was 1.5 ± 2.3 mm, 1.6 ± 2.0 mm, 2.0 ± 2.6 mm, 2.3 ± 2.3 mm, 2.6 ± 2.5 mm, and 2.7 ± 3.0 mm at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and ≥3 years from THA, respectively. Subsidence across all patients at final mean follow-up of 24 months (range, 1 to 101 months) was 2.2 ± 2.6 mm. Pairwise comparison demonstrated that subsidence occurred predominantly within the first 6 months. Significant subsidence (≥5 mm) occurred in 17.3% and was associated with a body mass index (BMI) ≥25 (P=0.04). Dorr type, age, sex, and American Society of Anesthesiologists class were not associated with subsidence. There were two patients (0.4%) who underwent a revision that could be attributed to subsidence. There was no association between subsidence and pain, limp, need for ambulatory aid, or analgesic use.

CONCLUSION

In primary THAs performed using a single-taper prosthesis, average subsidence was 2.2 mm and significant subsidence occurred in 17.3%. Patient BMI was associated with subsidence. Revision surgery related to subsidence was infrequent (0.4%).

No Difference In Subsidence Between Modern Monoblock And Modular Titanium Fluted Tapered Femoral Stems

BACKGROUND

Subsidence remains a concern when utilizing tapered fluted titanium (TFT) femoral stems and may lead to leg length discrepancy, impingement, instability and failure to obtain osseointegration. This study aims to compare stem subsidence across three modern TFT stems. Our secondary aim was to investigate the influence of bicortical contact or 'scratch fit' on subsidence, as well as the role of intraoperative imaging in maximizing bicortical contact and preventing stem subsidence.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 271 hip arthroplasties utilizing modern TFT stems at a single institution was performed. Three stem designs were included in the analysis: one monoblock TFT stem (n=91) and two modular TFT stems (n=90; n=90). Patient demographics, Paprosky femoral bone loss classification, bicortical contact, utilization of intra-operative imaging, and stem subsidence (comparison of initial post-operative radiograph to the latest follow up radiograph - minimum three months) were recorded.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in overall subsidence (P=0.191) or the incidence of subsidence >5 millimeters between stems (P= 0.126). Subgroup analysis based on femoral bone loss grading showed no difference in subsidence between stems. Increased bicortical contact was associated with reduced subsidence (P=0.004). Intra-operative imaging was used in 46.5% (126 of 271) of cases; this was not correlated with bicortical contact (P=0.673) or subsidence (P=0.521).

CONCLUSION

All three modern TFT stems were highly successful and associated with low rates of subsidence, regardless of modular or monoblock design. Surgeons should select the stem that they feel is most clinically appropriate.

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of a Monoblock Fluted Titanium-Tapered Stem for Paprosky IIIa, IIIb, and IV Femoral Bone Defects

BACKGROUND

Modern fluted titanium-tapered stems (FTTS) have been increasingly utilized to achieve primary stability in conversion and revision total hip arthroplasty with major femoral bone loss. This study sought to determine the radiographic and clinical outcomes of a monoblock FTTS in patients who had major femoral bone loss.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective observational study of all total hip arthroplasty patients who received a monoblock FTTS who had up to 5-year radiographic follow-up was conducted. Only patients with femoral Paprosky classifications of IIIa, IIIb, and IV were included. Eighty-one monoblock FTTS were examined. Median clinical follow-up was 29 months (range, 18 to 58). Stem subsidence and loosening were assessed on most recent radiographs. All-cause revisions and stem survivals were assessed.

RESULTS

Median subsidence was 1.4 millimeters (mm) (range, 0 to 15.0). Sixteen (23.9%) and 3 (4.5%) stems had subsidence greater than 5 and 10 mm, respectively. All stems not acutely revised appeared stable, without evidence of loosening, at latest follow-up. Ten hips (12.3%) required reoperations. Of these, only 5 (6.2%) stems were removed; 4 due to periprosthetic joint infection and 1 for surgical exposure during acetabular revision. Kaplan-Meier analyses yielded an all-cause stem survivorship of 95.1% at 2-years and 87.1% at 4-years. Stem survivorships excluding septic causes was 98.8% at both 2 and 4 years.

CONCLUSION

Monoblock FTTS in complex femoral reconstruction cases showed encouraging clinical and radiographic results in patients who had severe femoral bone loss at median 29 months follow-up.

Femoral defects in revision hip arthroplasty: a therapy-oriented classification

INTRODUCTION

The complex field of femoral defects in revision hip arthroplasty displays a lack of standardized, intuitive pre- and intraoperative assessment. To address this issue, the femoral defect classification (FDC) is introduced to offer a reliable, reproducible and an intuitive classification system with a clear therapeutic guideline.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The FDC is based on the integrity of the main femoral segments which determine function and structural support. It focuses on the femoral neck, the metaphysis consisting of the greater and lesser trochanter, and the femoral diaphysis. The four main categories determine the location of the defect while subcategories a, b and c are being used to classify the extent of damage in each location. In total, 218 preoperative radiographs were retrospectively graded according to FDC and compared to intraoperatively encountered bone defects. To account for inter-rater and intra-rater agreement, 5 different observers evaluated 80 randomized cases at different points in time.

RESULTS

A Cohens kappa of 0.832 ± 0.028 could be evaluated, accounting for excellent agreement between preoperative radiographs and intraoperative findings. To account for inter-rater reliability, 80 patients have been evaluated by 5 different observers. Testing for inter-rater reliability, a Fleiss Kappa of 0.688 could be evaluated falling into the good agreement range. When testing for intra-rater reliability, Cohens Kappa of each of the 5 raters has been analyzed and the mean was evaluated at 0.856 accounting for excellent agreement.

CONCLUSION

The FDC is a reliable and reproducible classification system. It combines intuitive use and structured design and allows for consistent preoperative planning and intraoperative guidance. A therapeutic algorithm has been created according to current literature and expert opinion. Due to the combination of the FDC with the recently introduced Acetabular Defect Classification (ADC) a structured approach to the entire field of hip revision arthroplasty is now available.

Long-Term Outcomes of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Tapered and Fluted Modular Stem: A Mean Follow-Up of 16 Years

BACKGROUND

Tapered modular stems are increasingly used in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) with deficient femoral bone stock. This study aimed to report the long-term outcomes of revision THA using a tapered and fluted modular stem.

METHODS

Between December 1998 and February 2006, 113 revision THAs (110 patients) were performed with a tapered and fluted modular stem at a single institution. Hip radiographs were used to identify stem subsidence, stability, and femoral radiolucency. Final outcomes were assessed in 72 hips (70 patients), with a minimum follow-up of 10 years.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up duration was 16 years (range, 10-23). At the final evaluation, the Harris Hip Score improved from a mean of 41 points (range, 10-72) preoperatively to 83 points (range, 56-100) (P < .001). Six femoral re-revisions were performed for the following reasons: 1 aseptic loosening, 2 stem fractures, and 3 infections. One stem fracture occurred at the modular junction after 14 years, and the other at a more distal location after 15 years. Stem subsidence was >5 mm in 6 hips (9.1%), but secondary stability was achieved in all stems. Osseointegration was observed in 63 (95.5%) hips. Stem survivorship was 91.1% with an end point of any re-revision and 94.6% for aseptic re-revision.

CONCLUSION

A tapered and fluted modular stem demonstrated excellent implant survivorship with reliable bony fixation at a mean follow-up of 16 years. This type of stem can be a durable option for revision THA in patients who have femoral defects.

Comparison of two tapered fluted modular titanium (TFMT) stems used in revision hip arthroplasty from a single center

Background

TFMT stems are modular porous coated stems widely used in revision hip arthroplasty. Although TFMT stems are popular due to its proven advantage in the setting of severe bone deficiency, subsidence is a concern in these stem designs. We used two TFMT stems between 2013 and 2019, ARCOS(Zimmer Biomet) and Reclaim(Depuy Synthes). We reviewed our results and compared these stems.

Aim

The primary aim was a) look for early to mid-term stem survival b) radiological outcome measuring subsidence, secondary aim was to measure proximal femoral bone stock changes.

Materials and methods

Data was collected retrospectively. There were 51 patients in Arcos and 57 patients in Reclaim cohort. Both cohorts were comparable with respect to gender, side, BMI, paprosky defect, indications for surgery, ETO and stem length. The mean age group was 78.03 in Arcos and 73.75 in Reclaim.

Results

At a mean follow up of 5 years both cohorts showed excellent stem survival, 96.4% in Reclaim cohort as compared to 100% in Arcos. Subsidence was observed in both but none required a revision due to subsidence. There was a significant difference (p = 0.017) between the cohorts with mean of 2.3 mm(0-12 mm) in Arcos as compared to 4.5 mm(0-25 mm) in Reclaim. Both cohorts showed excellent restoration of proximal femoral bone stock.

Conclusion

Our data shows promising results using TFMT stems at 5 year follow up with more than 95% stem survival, minimal subsidence and good restoration of proximal femoral bone stock. The difference in subsidence between these stems may be attributed to stem geometry and difference in taper.

The Length of Diaphyseal Contact of Tapered Fluted Stems is Highly Dependent on Canal Morphology

BACKGROUND

Diaphyseal fixation remains the mainstay of revision THA. The stability of diaphyseal fixation can be quantified by the extent of contact between the stem and the endosteal cortex. This is highly affected by the morphology of the proximal femur. The purpose of this study was to examine factors affecting diaphyseal contact in the revision THA and to identify preoperative predictors of adequate fixation.

METHODS

Three-dimensional femur models were created from CT scans of 33 Dorr B and C femora. The proximal 120 mm of the femur was omitted to mimic proximal bone deficiency. A tapered fluted stem (3 degrees, 150 mm) model was virtually implanted after reaming of the medullary canal. The contact length between stem and endosteal cortex was measured, in addition to other variables. The relationship between variables was evaluated using Spearman's correlation, and logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of the contact length (P < .05).

RESULTS

The contact length varied widely between specimens (66.5 ± 16.6 mm, range: 21-98 mm). Contact increased with the depth of the isthmus below the lesser trochanter (range: 55-155 mm; r² = 0.473, P = .005) and the distance between the isthmus and the distal edge of the damage zone (range: -9 to 96 mm; r² = 0.508, P = .002). Stepwise regression identified the reaming length, distance between fracture and the isthmus, and isthmus diameter as independent predictors of contact length (r = 0.643).

CONCLUSIONS

Contact is limited in specimens where the isthmus is more proximally located. In these cases, supplementary fixation using plating and/or longer, curved prosthesis may be considered.

Mid-Term Survivorship, Performance, and Predictors of Outcome in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Porous Tantalum Femoral Prosthesis

BACKGROUND

Femoral stem subsidence is a known cause of early implant failure, increasing the risk for aseptic loosening and periprosthetic fracture. Overall survivorship and subsidence in a novel porous tantalum-coated femoral prosthesis have not been well-studied.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty with a porous tantalum-coated femoral prosthesis between January 2008 and January 2015 with minimum 5-year follow-up were included. Clinical and radiographic data were obtained from hospital and office records. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine predictors of subsidence and clinical outcomes. Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves were performed to illustrate primary failure endpoints of (1) all-cause revision and (2) femoral prosthesis revision.

RESULTS

A total of 398 patients with a mean (±standard deviation) age of 61.0 ± 11.5 years, body mass index (BMI) 32.8 ± 8.0 kg/m², and follow-up of 6.9 (range 5.0-11.2 years) were included. Survivorship at 5 years was 94.9% for all-cause revision and 98.0% for femoral component revision. Average subsidence was 1.8 ± 1.3 mm (range 0-15.5), with 8.1% patients experiencing subsidence >5 mm. Statistically significant mean improvements were observed at latest follow-up in the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement (40.6 ± 11.5 vs 85.2 ± 10.1, P < .001), Harris Hip Score (38.0 ± 12.0 vs 79.5 ± 12.8, P < .001), and hip flexion (92.8° ± 15.3° vs 103.3° ± 10.3°, P < .001). Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that greater BMI (odds ratio [OR] 1.17, P < .001), non-white/Caucasian race (OR 2.0, P = .036), and female gender (OR 2.4; P = .005) conferred a higher likelihood of subsidence >3 mm. BMI was a statistically significant and independent predictor of subsidence >5 mm (OR 1.25, P < .001) and subsidence >7 mm (OR 1.25, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The trabecular metal taper femoral prosthesis conferred excellent clinical outcome improvement and survivorship. Increasing BMI was independently associated with an increased risk of subsidence in these patients and caution is recommended in utilizing this implant in obese, morbidly obese, and super morbidly obese populations.

Reconstruction of Proximal Metaphyseal Femoral Defects Using Trabecular Metal Augments in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

Porous tantalum augments are widely used in revision total hip arthroplasty for the reconstruction of severe bone defects. Here, we present the first 3 cases who underwent femoral revision arthroplasty using standard distal femoral and proximal tibial porous tantalum cones to reconstruct severe bone loss in the proximal femur. Cones were inserted press fit, followed by implantation of a cemented revision stem in all cases. After a mean follow-up period of 15.8 months, all patients showed an improved Harris-Hip-Score and no radiological signs of subsidence or loosening. Porous tantalum cones may be an option in the reconstruction of severe femoral defects in revision total hip arthroplasty. The shape of the tantalum cones should be optimized for the use in the proximal femur.

Modern Revision Femoral Stem Designs Have No Difference in Rates of Subsidence

BACKGROUND

Both modular and monoblock tapered fluted titanium (TFT) stems have gained popularity over fully porous-coated cylindrical (FPCC) femoral stem designs, but limited data exist comparing subsidence rates following revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study is to determine differences in subsidence and clinical outcomes among 3 revision femoral stem designs.

METHODS

We reviewed a consecutive series of 335 patients who underwent femoral component revision to a cementless modular TFT (n = 225), monoblock TFT (n = 63), or FPCC (n = 47) stem between 2012 and 2019. We evaluated radiographic subsidence rates, re-revision rates, and patient-reported outcomes between the 3 stems. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine the independent effect of stem type on the risk of subsidence >5 mm.

RESULTS

At an average follow-up of 39 months (range, 12 to 96 months), there were no differences in mean subsidence rates (3.5 vs 2.4 vs 2.1 mm, P = .14), HOOS Jr scores (78 vs 74 vs 64 points, P = .15), or aseptic re-revision rates (4% vs 3% vs 0%, P = .29) between modular TFT, monoblock TFT, and FPCC stems. Although modular TFT stems were more often used in patients with extensive femoral bone loss (Paprosky III and IV), there were no differences in subsidence rates >5 mm among the 3 stems (P > .05) in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Modular TFT, monoblock TFT, and FPCC femoral stem designs all perform well in revision THA with no difference in clinical outcomes or subsidence rates. Surgeons should select the stem which they feel is the most clinically appropriate.

Revision Hip Arthroplasty Using a Porous-coated or Taper ZMR Implant: Minimum 10-year Follow-up of Implant Survivorship

INTRODUCTION

The Zimmer Modular Revision hip (ZMR) system is available in two stem options, a porous-coated cylindrical (PCM) and a taper (TM) stem. Several concerns have been reported regarding modular implants. Specifically, because of early junctional fractures, the ZMR system was redesigned with a wider modular interface. As such, we designed a study assessing long-term ZMR survivorship and functional and radiographic outcomes.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A search of our institutional research database was performed. A minimum 10-year follow-up was selected. The following two cohorts were created: PCM and TM stems. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed, and causes of stem failure requiring revision surgery were collected. Functional outcomes as per the Harris Hip Score and radiographic stem stability were assessed as per the Engh classification.

RESULTS

A total of 146 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were available for follow-up (PCM = 68, TM = 78). The mean follow-up was 13.4 years clinically and 11.1 years radiographically for the PCM cohort. Similarly, the TM cohort had a follow-up of 11.1 years clinically and 10.5 years radiographically. The Kaplan-Meier survivorships were 87.1% and 87.8% at 15 years for the PCM and TM cohorts, respectively. The most common cause of failure requiring revision surgery overall was aseptic loosening (PCM = 1.4%, TM = 5.6%). The mean postoperative Harris Hip Score was as follows: PCM = 71.2 and TM = 64.7. Engh type I or II stem ingrowth was as follows: PCM = 85% and TM = 68%.

DISCUSSION

Good survivorship using the ZMR stem system can be expected at up to 15 years. Aseptic loosening remains the most commonly encountered problem for both PCM and TM stems. Previously identified modular junctional weakness seem to have been addressed.

Comparison of modular and nonmodular tapered fluted titanium stems in femoral revision hip arthroplasty: a minimum 6-year follow-up study

Both modular and nonmodular tapered fluted titanium stems are commonly used in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, which type of femoral stem is superior remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes of modular and nonmodular tapered fluted titanium. The clinical data of patients undergoing primary revision THA from January 2009 to January 2013 in two institutions were retrospectively analyzed. According to the type of prosthesis used on the femoral side, the patients were divided into the modular group (108 hips; Link MP modular stem in 73 hips and AK-MR modular stem in 35 hips) and nonmodular group (110 hips; Wagner SL stem in 78 hips and AK-SL stem in 32 hips). The operative time, hospital stay, blood loss, blood transfusion volume, hip function, hip pain, limb length discrepancy, imaging data, and complications were compared between the two groups.A total of 218 patients were followed up for 78–124 months, with an average of 101.5 months. The incidence of intraoperative fracture in the modular group (16.7%) was significantly higher than that in the nonmodular group (4.5%; (P < 0.05). At the last follow-up, the limb length difference in the modular group (2.3 ± 2.7 mm) was significantly lower than that in the nonmodular group (5.6 ± 3.5 mm; P < 0.05), and the postoperative prosthesis subsidence in the modular group (averaged 0.92 mm; 0–10.2 mm) was significantly less than that in the nonmodular group (averaged 2.20 mm; 0–14.7 mm; P < 0.05). Both modular and nonmodular tapered fluted titanium stems can achieve satisfactory mid-term clinical and imaging results in patients who underwent femoral revision. The modular stems have good control of lower limb length and low incidence of prosthesis subsidence.

Bicortical Contact Predicts Subsidence of Modular Tapered Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

We describe the intraoperative parameters that affect stem subsidence rates in tapered modular femoral stems for revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). We also determine the effect of the stem bicortical contact on subsidence rates and whether there is a minimum threshold bicortical contact that must be achieved to avoid the complication of subsidence.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study consisting of 109 hips in 105 patients (53 males and 52 females) at a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. All revisions were carried out for Paprosky type 3A and 3B femoral deficits. Clinical outcomes included the indication for revision, aseptic re-revision surgery, specifications of the stem inserted, and specifications of the femoral head and acetabular components implanted. Radiographic outcome measures included subsidence (mm) and bicortical contact (mm).

RESULTS

Using multivariate regression analysis, 3 parameters were associated with an increased rate of stem subsidence. A reduced bicortical contact distance (P < .001) and a stem length of ≤155 mm (P < .001) were both associated with higher subsidence rates. We also demonstrated a novel threshold of 20-mm bicortical contact which must be achieved to significantly reduce subsidence rates in these modular femoral stems for revision THA.

CONCLUSION

Subsidence rates of modular tapered femoral stems for revision THA can be significantly reduced by increasing the initial bicortical contact of the stem within the diaphysis and the overall length of the femoral stem >155 mm. We describe a minimum threshold bicortical contact distance of 20 mm that should ideally be exceeded to significantly reduce the risk of stem subsidence within the femoral canal.

Outcomes of modular femoral revision implants and the effect of component design on subsidence

AIMS

Femoral revision component subsidence has been identified as predicting early failure in revision hip surgery. This comparative cohort study assessed the potential risk factors of subsidence in two commonly used femoral implant designs.

METHODS

A comparative cohort study was undertaken, analyzing a consecutive series of patients following revision total hip arthroplasties using either a tapered-modular (TM) fluted titanium or a porous-coated cylindrical modular (PCM) titanium femoral component, between April 2006 and May 2018. Clinical and radiological assessment was compared for both treatment cohorts. Risk factors for subsidence were assessed and compared.

RESULTS

In total, 65 TM and 35 PCM cases were included. At mean follow-up of seven years (1 to 13), subsidence was noted in both cohorts during the initial three months postoperatively (p < 0.001) then implants stabilized. Subsidence noted in 58.7% (38/65 cases) of the TM cohort (mean 2.3 mm, SD 3.5 mm) compared to 48.8% (17/35) of PCM cohort (mean 1.9 mm, SD 2.6 mm; p = 0.344). Subsidence of PCM cohort were significantly associated with extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) (p < 0.041). Although the ETO was used less frequently in PCM stem cohort (7/35), subsidence was noted in 85% (6/7) of them. Significant improvement of the final mean Oxford Hip Score (OHS) was reported in both treatment groups (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Both modular TM and PCM revision femoral components subsided within the femur. TM implants subsided more frequently than PCM components if the femur was intact but with no difference in clinical outcomes. However, if an ETO is performed then a PCM component will subside significantly more and suggests the use of a TM implant may be advisable. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(6):709-715.

Subsidence Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Modular and Monolithic Components

BACKGROUND

The ideal femoral component in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) remains undetermined; however, tapered, fluted, titanium (TFT) stems are now widely used with favorable results in all types of revision scenarios. With both modular and monoblock TFT stem options, neither has been proven to be superior. Femoral stem subsidence has been linked to aseptic loosening, instability, and leg length discrepancy. This study aims to assess stem subsidence of modular and monoblock TFT stems at a single urban orthopedic specialty hospital within a tertiary academic medical center.

METHODS

Electronic medical records of rTHAs performed between January 2013 and March 2018 utilizing modular and monoblock TFT stems were examined. Data collected included baseline demographics, surgical indication, femoral Paprosky classification, and stem subsidence at most recent follow up (3 months to 3 years). Two-sample t-tests and chi-squared tests were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 186 patients (106 modular, 80 monoblock) were included in the analysis. Modular stems underwent significantly greater subsidence than monoblock stems at latest radiographic follow-up (3.9 ± 2.6 vs 2.3 ± 2.5 mm, P < .001). A significantly greater proportion of modular stems underwent >5 mm of subsidence at latest follow-up (29.2% vs 11.3%, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Monoblock TFT stems have displayed promising clinical results in prior studies, and now have been shown to decrease the incidence of postoperative subsidence. With the potential for stem subsidence to lead to aseptic loosening, limb length discrepancy, and instability, the orthopedic surgeon should weigh the risks and benefits of utilizing modular vs monoblock TFT stems in rTHA.

Risk factors for subsidence of modular fluted tapered stem implanted by using transfemoral Wagner approach during revision hip arthroplasty

PURPOSE

To determine clinical and radiographic risk factors for the vertical subsidence of modular fluted tapered stems implanted using the transfemoral Wagner approach in a cohort of revision hip arthroplasties.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a single-centre surgical registry was performed. Patients who underwent a revision total hip arthroplasty, in which the uncemented modular fluted tapered stem (REVISION Hip/Anca-Ti6Al4V, LimaCorporate, Udine, Italy) was implanted using the transfemoral Wagner approach, were identified. Patient's demographic data, clinical and radiographic outcomes and post-operative complications were assessed. As a significant subsidence, a 5-mm cut-off was chosen.

RESULTS

We identified 278 revision hip arthroplasties with a mean follow-up of 35 months. The median of subsidence in the group of 5 mm and less was 2 mm, and 17 mm in the group of subsidence of 5 mm and more. A negative correlation was found between the stem subsidence and the length of good contact between the medial and lateral cortical bone and the stem (medial, - 0.248; P < 0.001, lateral, 0.284; P < 0.001). For 200 mm stems, the percentage of good contact between femoral parts of stem and bone on medial side was 40.5% (81.0 mm) for patients with subsidence of five or less mm, and 30% (60.0 mm) for lateral side. For 140 mm stems, the percentage was 52.86% (74.0 mm) for medial side and 40.36% (56.5 mm) for lateral side. A neck length was shown to correlate significantly with the stem subsidence (P = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

It is crucial to provide good contact between the bilateral cortical bone and stem, and, if possible, to select implant constructs with shorter femoral necks, in order to reduce subsidence and to ensure longer implant survivorship.

Single 3° tapered fluted femoral stems demonstrate low subsidence at mid-term follow-up in severe bony deficiency

Background

Tapered femoral stems have become popular in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). Increasing the distal taper angle may mitigate subsidence. This study reports osseointegration of a new 3 degree distal taper revision stem at minimum 4 years post-operatively.

Methods

Indication for surgery, pre-operative bony deficiency and latest clinical, tribological and radiological follow-up were analysed. Radiographs were assessed by two blinded observers for preoperative femoral bone stock according to Paprosky, postoperative subsidence according to Callaghan and restoration of femoral bone stock over time according to Kolstad. Stem integration was determined using the Rodriguez classification.

Results

Twenty-three cases were analyzed at 5.9±1.0 years. All patients presented with Paprosky III defects. All stems met the criteria for osseointegration. Spot welds occurred distal to the proximal modular junction and at the tip. Two femora with severe proximal femoral bone loss recovered bone stock by final follow-up but two demonstrated stress shielding. No intraoperative fractures occurred. One stem subsided early but remained stable and osseointegrated at final follow up. There were no stem failures due to taper corrosion or modular junctional failure.

Conclusions

This study reports good osseointegration and low subsidence with a novel fluted, 3-degree tapered femoral stem demonstrates at medium-term follow-up in cases with severe femoral bone deficiency.

Femoral stem modularity

Femoral stem modularity in hip replacement was first developed to connect a ceramic head to the stem, then extended to metal heads using the Morse taper principle. Is it a good thing, or a necessary evil? It contributes to improving lower limb length and lateralization setting, at the cost of fairly rare complications such as dissociation and fretting corrosion, which can exceptionally lead to ARMD (Adverse Reaction to Metal Debris). Modular necks were later recommended, with a double Morse taper: cylindrical for the head junction, and more or less flattened for the stem. Is this one modularity too far? Dual modularity in theory perfectly reproduces the biomechanical parameters of the hip, but is unfortunately associated with fractures and severe corrosion, leading to ARMD and pseudotumor, especially in Cr-Co necks. Moreover, it provides no functional advantage, and no longer has a role outside dysplasia and other femoral deformities. Metaphyseal-diaphyseal modularity is not widespread in primary implants, and is it really necessary? Only one model has been widely studied: S-Rom™ (Depuy®). It features a metaphyseal sleeve adapting to the anatomy of the proximal femur, with a stem fitted via an inverse Morse taper. Its only interest is in case of congenital dislocation; like all metal connections, it incurs a risk of fracture and corrosion. On the other hand, modularity is widely employed in revision implants. Does it really help these procedures? The connection between a proximal femoral component of variable geometry and a diaphyseal stem with press-fit distal fixation provides a real solution to problems of length, lateralization and anteversion. Early models encountered high rates of fracture, but current implants and rigorous surgical technique have reduced this risk. Corrosion is a less serious problem, as the Morse taper undergoes only axial stress, without the friction undergone by other models subject to varus stress.

Clinical outcomes and survival rate of cementless modular distal fixation femoral stem for revision hip arthroplasty: A minimum 6-year follow-up

PURPOSE

Revision hip arthroplasty is a very challenging procedure. Use of a modular distal fixation stem is one of the available options for revision arthroplasty in patients with proximal femoral bone deficiency. The purpose of this study was to evaluate mid- to long-term outcomes of cementless modular distal fixation femoral stem implantation in revision hip surgery.

METHODS

Clinical and radiological findings, complications, and stem survival rate were analyzed for 46 patients (48 hips) who underwent revision hip arthroplasty using a cementless modular distal fixation femoral stem. The mean patient age was 58.8 years (range 31-82 years) and the mean follow-up period was 95 months (72-122 months). The preoperative diagnoses were aseptic loosening (36 hips), infection (4 hips), ceramic fracture (4 hips), and femoral periprosthetic fracture (4 hips).

RESULTS

The mean Harris hip score improved from 56.6 preoperatively to 88.2 postoperatively at the last follow-up. All hips showed stable osteointegration and firm fixation. Complications involved four hips (8.3%); there was one case each of periprosthetic fracture, delayed union of osteotomy site, femoral perforation, and infection. One stem re-revision was performed for deep infection of the femoral side. The Kaplan-Meier survival rate was 97.6% at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Revision hip arthroplasty using a cementless modular distal fixation femoral stem showed satisfactory initial firm fixation and mid- to long-term survival rate. Complications can be minimized by careful surgical planning and meticulous procedure.

Mid-term outcomes of titanium modular neck femoral stems in revision total hip arthroplasty

Background

Modular stems have been widely studied as they allow intraoperative adjustments (offset, anteversion, limb length) to better restore hip biomechanics. Many authors reported outcomes of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) using modular stems with metaphyseal-diaphyseal junctions, however, little is known about modular neck femoral stems (MNFS) with metaphyseal-epiphyseal junctions. We therefore aimed to report outcomes and implant survival of a MNFS in a consecutive series of revision THA at a minimum follow-up of 5 years.

Methods

We reviewed a consecutive series of 28 revision THAs performed between February 2010 and March 2012 using an uncemented MNFS. The final study cohort included 25 patients living with their original components, at a mean follow-up of 68.4±7.4 months and aged 67.7±11.6 years at index operation.

Results

The Harris Hip Score (HHS) improved from 39.1±19.2 pre-operatively to 78.1±18.3 post-operatively, and the Postel Merle d'Aubigné score (PMA) improved from 9.8±3.0 pre-operatively to 14.8±2.8 post-operatively. The postoperative limb length discrepancy (LLD) was >10 mm in 18% of the hips. There were no significant differences of femoral offset and neck shaft angle (NSA) between operated and contralateral hips. Two hips (8.0%) showed new periprosthetic radiolucent lines. Periprosthetic fractures (PPF) occurred in 3 hips (12%). No subluxations, dislocations or implant breakages were reported. One revision (3.6%) was performed with retrieval of the revision stem for infection. The Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival at 5 years, using stem revision as endpoint, was 96.0%.

Conclusions

The Optimal^® MNFS provided a satisfactory survival and clinical outcomes at 5 years, with no noticeable adverse effects resulting from the additional modular junction.

Long-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty with a cemented femoral component

INTRODUCTION

In revision total hip arthroplasty (THA), the cancellous bone is normally completely removed out of the femoral canal during stem extraction. This situation is comparable to primary THA following the shape-closed concept, with some authors advocating to remove the metaphyseal cancellous bone to enhance press-fit stability ("French paradox"). The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term outcome, regarding survival and radiological results, of a cemented straight stem when used for revision THA and to compare these results to the results of the same stem in primary THA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

178 stem revisions performed between 01/1994 and 08/2008 using the Virtec straight stem were included. The cumulative incidence for re-revision was calculated using a competing risk model. Risk factors for re-revision of the stem were analyzed using an absolute risk regression model. Radiographs analyzed for osteolysis, debonding and subsidence had a minimum follow-up of 10 years.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence for re-revision due to aseptic loosening of the stem was 5.5% (95% CI, 2.9-10.2%) at 10 years. Aseptic loosening was associated with younger age, larger defect size and larger stem size. After a minimum 10-year follow-up, osteolysis was seen in 39 of 80 revision THA. Compared to the results in primary THA, the survival in revision THA with the same implant was inferior.

CONCLUSIONS

Cemented straight stems used for revision THA showed excellent long-term results regarding survivorship and radiological outcome. This stem therefore offers a valuable and cost-effective option in revision THA.

Modified Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy for the Treatment of Vancouver B2/B3 Periprosthetic Fractures of the Femur

BACKGROUND

Femoral component revision is the treatment of choice for Vancouver type B2/B3 periprosthetic femur fractures (PFFs). The purpose of this study was to report the clinical outcome of revision total hip arthroplasty with the use of a modified extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) in PFF treatment.

METHODS

A total of 43 cases between 2000 and 2014 were analyzed. Clinical and radiographic evaluation was performed with a mean follow-up of 40 months. Patient survival after revision surgery, complications, radiographic outcomes, and quality of life and hip function were assessed.

RESULTS

Merle d'Aubignè and Postel score averaged 15, and mean postoperative Harris hip score was 70. Radiographic evaluation revealed that the ETO and fractures healed in all but 1 patient within 9 months. Component stability and apparent osseointegration were not coincident with healing of the osteotomy and fracture sites proximal to the inserted stem. Six patients (15%) developed postoperative complications, which included the following: 1 nonunion with progressive subsidence, 2 hip dislocations, 2 deep infections, and 1 breakage of the modular junction of the revision stem.

CONCLUSION

The modified ETO with a lateral approach to the hip for the treatment of PFF is compatible with fracture healing, a low dislocation rate, and good clinical results. However, component stability and apparent osseointegration are coincident with fracture healing only in the distal aspect of the inserted stem. Absence of proximal osseointegration might lead to poor osseous support resulting in inadequate fatigue strength at the junction of the dual modular revision stem.

Management of femoral bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty

Femoral bone loss is frequently encountered during revision total hip arthroplasty. The quality and quantity of remaining bone helps determine the best method for reconstruction. Extensively porous-coated cylindrical stems or titanium fluted tapered devices that achieve fixation in the diaphysis have both demonstrated excellent long-term survivorship. Titanium fluted tapered stems with a modular proximal body allow for more accurate leg length, offset, and version adjustments independent of the distal stem which may optimise hip biomechanics. Intraoperative fractures are more common with cylindrical stems and subsidence with tapered stems, particularly monoblock designs and in both dislocation continues to be one of the most common postoperative complications. In salvage situations in which an ectatic femoral canal is unable to support an uncemented device, impaction bone grafting, allograft-prosthetic composite, or a segmental proximal femoral replacement may be required.