Femoral Vessel Blood Flow Is Preserved Throughout Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty

Effect of anterior approach compared to posterolateral approach on readiness for discharge and thrombogenic markers in patients undergoing unilateral total hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

The direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) is considered less invasive than the posterolateral approach (PLA), possibly leading to earlier mobilization, faster recovery, and lower levels of thrombogenic markers. The purpose of the current study was to prospectively compare readiness for discharge, rehabilitation milestones, markers of thrombosis and inflammation at 6 weeks postoperatively between DAA and PLA.

METHODS

A total of 40 patients (20 anterior and 20 posterolateral) were prospectively enrolled. Readiness for discharge, length of stay (LOS), and related outcomes were additionally documented. Blood was drawn at baseline, wound closure, 5-h post-closure, and 24-h post-closure for assays of interleukin-6 (IL-6), PAP (plasmin anti-plasmin), a marker of fibrinolysis, and PF1.2 (Prothrombin fragment 1.2), a marker of thrombin generation.

RESULTS

Compared to the PLA group, the DAA group was ready for discharge a mean 13 h earlier (p = 0.03), while rehabilitation milestones were met a mean 10 h earlier (p = 0.04), and LOS was 13 h shorter (p = 0.02) on average. Pain scores at all study timepoints and patient satisfaction at 6 weeks were similar (p > 0.05). At 24 h postoperatively, PAP levels were 537.53 ± 94.1 µg/L vs. 464.39 ± 114.6 µg/L (p = 0.05), and Il-6 levels were 40.94 ± 26.1 pg/mL vs. 60.51 ± 33.0 pg/mL (p = 0.03), in DAA vs. PLA, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In the immediate postoperative period, DAA patients were ready for discharge before PLA patients. DAA patients had shorter LOS, a lower inflammatory response, and higher systemic markers of fibrinolysis. However, these differences may not be clinically significant. Future studies with larger study populations are warranted to confirm the validity and significance of these findings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, Therapeutic Study.

A Comparison of the Incidences of Venous Thromboembolism after Total Hip Arthroplasty between the Direct Anterior Approach and the Direct Lateral Approach, Especially in the Early Period after Introduction of the Direct Anterior Approach

OBJECTIVE

To compare the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the direct anterior approach (DAA) with that using the direct lateral approach (DLA). In addition, patient background characteristics and the incidence of VTE were compared between the first half and the latter half of the period after introducing DAA and against DLA.

METHOD

This was a retrospective, multicenter study involving 109 patients (116 hips) who had undergone primary unilateral THA. Thirty-six hips underwent THA using DAA and 80 hips underwent THA using DLA. Patient information including sex, age, and preoperative diagnosis was collected. The incidence of VTE was compared between DAA and DLA. Moreover, the patients who underwent THA using DAA were divided into 2 groups (first half and latter half groups), and sex, age, body mass index (BMI), and surgical time were compared between the 2 groups. Moreover, the incidence of VTE was compared among the 3 groups (first half of DAA, latter half of DAA, and DLA).

RESULTS

The incidence of VTE in the DAA group was significantly higher than that in the DLA group (p=0.014). The incidence of VTE in the first half group was significantly higher than in the latter half group and the DLA group (p=0.035 and p=0.001, respectively), and there was no difference in the incidence of VTE between the latter half group and the DLA group (p=0.923). Surgical time was significantly longer in the first half group than in the latter half group (p=0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

In the first half of the period after introducing the DAA, more VTEs occurred than in the DLA. It may be important to shorten the surgical time in the early stage of introducing the DAA, and aggressive anticoagulation therapy may be required until the surgeon becomes familiar with the procedure.

[Comparison of early rehabilitation effects of total hip arthroplasty with direct anterior approach versus posterior approach]

Objective

To compare the early rehabilitation effects of total hip arthroplasty (THA) with direct anterior approach (DAA) versus posterior approach (PA).

Methods

A retrospective analysis was made in the data of 83 patients with unilateral osteonecrosis of the femoral head between March 2014 and May 2017. Forty-eight patients were treated with THA via PA (PA group) and 35 patients were treated with THA via DAA (DAA group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, stage of osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and disease duration between 2 groups ( P>0.05). The length of incision, operation time, total amount of bleeding, the time of first postoperative walking with crutch, the time of first postoperative walking without crutch, the Harris scores, and the visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of 2 group were recorded and compared.

Results

All incisions healed primarily and no infection, dislocation, or fracture occurred. All patients were followed up 30.2 months on average (range, 6-44 months). The numbness symptom caused by the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury occurred in 2 patients of DAA group and released after symptomatic treatment. The length of incision, total amount of bleeding, the time of first postoperative walking with crutch, and the time of first postoperative walking without crutch of DAA group were significantly superior to those of PA group ( P<0.05). The Harris scores of DAA group were significantly higher than those of PA group at 2 weeks and 1 month after operation ( P<0.05), while no significant difference was found between 2 groups before operation and at 3 months and 6 months after operation ( P>0.05). The VAS scores of DAA group were significantly lower than those of PA group at 1 day, 4 days, 1 week, and 2 weeks after operation ( P<0.05), while no significant difference was found between 2 groups before operation ( P>0.05).

Conclusion

DAA is meaningful to enhanced recovery after THA. But it should be chosen carefully because of the disadvantages, such as long learning curve, limited indications, and requirements of specific instruments.