Agreement Between Proximal Femoral Geometry and Component Design in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Implications for Implant Choice

Clinical application of artificial intelligence-assisted three-dimensional planning in direct anterior approach hip arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of an artificial intelligence-assisted 3D planning system (AIHIP) in total hip arthroplasty by direct anterior approach and assess the reliability of the AIHIP preoperative program in terms of both interobserver and intraobserver agreement.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent unilateral primary THA via direct anterior approach from June 2019 to March 2022. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either the AIHIP system (n = 220) or the 2D template (control group) (n = 220) for preoperative planning. The primary outcome aimed to evaluate the correspondence between the prosthesis selected intro-operation and the one planned preoperatively, as well as to calculate the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Secondary outcomes included operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy times, Harris hip score (HHS), lower limb length difference (LLD), femoral offset (FO), and bilateral femoral offset difference.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed in gender, age, body mass index (BMI), aetiology, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score between the two groups. Both planning methods exhibited good intraobserver agreement for component planning (ICC: 0.941-0.976). Interobserver agreement for component planning was comparable between the two methods (ICC: 0.882-0.929). In the AIHIP group, the accuracy of acetabular cup and femoral stem prosthetics planning significantly improved, with accuracies within the size range of ± 0 and ± 1 being 76.8% and 90.5% and 79.5% and 95.5%, respectively. All differences between two groups were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Patients receiving AIHIP preoperative planning experienced shorter operation times, reduced intraoperative blood loss, fewer fluoroscopy times, and lower leg length discrepancy (LLD) (p < 0.05). Moreover, they demonstrated a higher Harris hip score (HHS) at three days post-surgery (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were found in femoral offset (FO), difference of bilateral femoral offsets, and HHS at 1 month after the operation.

CONCLUSION

Utilizing AIHIP for preoperative planning of direct anterior approach THA can significantly enhance the accuracy of prosthetic sizing with good reliability, decrease operation time, reduce intraoperative blood loss, and more effectively restore the length of both lower limbs. This approach has greater clinical application value.

Age and Sex Influence the Use of Modular Femoral Components in Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed for Primary Osteoarthritis

The impact of age and sex on femoral component choices in modular total hip arthroplasty (THA) is still unknown. A regional arthroplasty registry was interrogated about a modular stem in THA performed for primary osteoarthritis, with the aims to assess the influence of age and sex on stems sizes and neck choices. A total of 6830 THAs were included: all THAs had a modular stem (with 15 necks and 27 combinations per side). Patients were stratified by age in decades and sex. Necks were grouped according to the type of correction. The percentage of larger stem sizes increased in males and in elder patients (p < 0.001). Standard necks were overrepresented in males aged 40-59 and underrepresented in males aged 70 or older (p < 0.001). Half of the necks provided other corrections than standard or offset, especially in males aged 40-49 and females aged 70 or older (p < 0.001). Offset necks were predominant in elder patients (p < 0.001). Version-correcting necks were prevalent in younger males and older females (p < 0.001). Varus necks were implanted in one-third of the cases. The four commonest necks showed age and sex specific patterns. In the registry, age and sex impacted stem size and neck choices in THA performed for primary osteoarthritis.

Age-Associated Changes in Proximal Femur Morphology Affect Femoral Component Sizing in Cementless Hip Arthroplasty

Background

In cementless hip arthroplasty, the femoral component should obtain firm fixation within the endosteal bone and achieve adequate reconstruction of hip joint biomechanics simultaneously. Previous anatomical studies described age-related changes of the proximal femoral canal, such as canal widening, which theoretically necessitates the use of larger stem sizes in elderly patients. This study examines a potential association between patients’ age at surgery and the implant size of a cementless femoral component.

Material and methods

A total of 13,423 primary hip arthroplasties with a single cementless stem registered in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI) were included. Patient characteristics (ie patients’ age, sex, height and weight at time of surgery) and femoral component size were derived. A one-way ANCOVA was used to compare the mean stem size between age groups, and multivariable linear regression analysis was used in order to investigate to which extent ageing impacted stem size.

Results

Each subsequent age- group (ten-year intervals) had a significantly larger mean stem size than the prior age- group. Multivariable linear regression analysis revealed that age is positively correlated with stem size and that this correlation is more prominent in females than in males (beta = .046, P < .001 and beta = .028, P < .001 respectively).

Interpretation

Implant size is positively correlated with age, in particular in females and independently from investigated anthropometric characteristics. The present study endorses that the femoral canal morphology is related to patients’ characteristics such as age and sex. The morphology will subsequently influence implant sizing and therefore may have biomechanical and clinical implications.

Cementless femoral stem fixation and leg-length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty in different proximal femoral morphological types

PURPOSE

Leg-length changes at total hip arthroplasty (THA) may result from too proximal position of the femoral component, i.e. not being sunk deep enough into the femoral canal due to the size and shape of both medullary canal and implant. Some femoral implants are designed to achieve such fixation in the mediolateral dimension, while others also engage the bone anteroposteriorly. Our aim was to examine the relationship between proximal femoral morphology, osseointegration and leg-length equalization at THA. We asked whether the Dorr classification, femoral cortical index and canal flare index on preoperative radiographs had significant impact on THA aseptic loosening rates and post-operative leg-length discrepancy (LLD).

METHODS

Literature review included original articles on proximal femoral morphology with post-operative LLD and other clinical outcomes of THA, published in the last decade. Case reports and biomechanical studies without clinical data were excluded.

RESULTS

Higher femoral cortical index and/or canal flare index (corresponding to the Dorr type A) increases the risk of leg lengthening at THA. This is particularly notable in femoral stems with metaphyseal fixation, where high canal flare index has also been linked to osseointegration failure and implant loosening. On the other hand, lower canal flare index (corresponding to the Dorr type C) is more prevalent in the elderly population and increases late periprosthetic fracture rates and stress shielding. Even the most commonly used cementless femoral stems cannot offer optimal fit to intra-/extramedullary geometry or offset restoration in up to 30% of clinical cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Femoral morphology can have significant impact on post-operative LLD and osseointegration of cementless THA. Quantitative measurements of the proximal femoral canal may improve the choice of a particular implant and fixation method.

Computationally efficient modelling of hip replacement separation due to small mismatches in component centres of rotation

Patient imaging and explant analysis has shown evidence of edge loading of hard-on-hard hip replacements in vivo. Experimental hip simulator testing under edge loading conditions has produced increased, clinically-relevant, wear rates for hard-on-hard bearings when compared to concentric conditions. Such testing, however, is time consuming and costly. A quick running computational edge loading model (Python Edge Loading (PyEL) - quasi-static, rigid, frictionless), capable of considering realistic bearing geometries, was developed. The aim of this study was to produce predictions of separation within the typical experimental measurement error of ∼0.5 mm. The model was verified and validated against comparable finite element (FE) models (including inertia and friction) and pre-existing experimental test data for 56 cases, covering a variety of simulated cup orientations, positions, tissue tensions, and loading environments. The PyEL model agreed well with both the more complex computational modelling and experimental results. From comparison with the FE models, the assumption of no inertia had little effect on the maximum separation prediction. With high contact force cases, the assumption of no friction had a larger effect (up to ∼5% error). The PyEL model was able to predict the experimental maximum separations within ∼0.3 mm. It could therefore be used to optimise an experimental test plan and efficiently investigate a much wider range of scenarios and variables. It could also help explain trends and damage modes seen in experimental testing through identifying the contact locations on the liner that are not easily measured experimentally.

Upper Femur Anatomy Depends on Age and Gender: A Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Comparative Bone Morphometric Analysis of 628 Healthy Patients' Hips

BACKGROUND

The knowledge of proximal femur geometry is essential in the understanding and treatment of hip pathologies. Our aim is to evaluate the range of "normal anatomical values of the proximal femur" and their relationship to age, gender, and ethnicity in a cohort of healthy population, using a 3-dimensional computed tomography automated software.

METHODS

The pelvis and bilateral femora of 628 healthy individuals (394 males/234 females, mean age 61.5 ± 16.5 years, mean body mass index [BMI] 26.9 ± 5.2 kg/m²) including 2 ethnicities (226 Asians and 406 Caucasians) were assessed with a 3-dimensional computed tomography scan-based system using algorithm-calculated landmarks. The demographic parameters recorded were age, gender, BMI, and ethnicity. The femoral neck-shaft angle (NSA), femoral neck version, femoral offset (FO), and femoral canal flare index (fCFI) were calculated for each individual. Analyses were performed using SPSS version 22. P-values <.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance.

RESULTS

Overall, the mean NSA was 124.7° (standard deviation [SD] 6.2), mean femoral neck version was 14.5° (SD 8.1), mean FO was 42.9 mm (SD 6.8), and mean fCFI was 3.4 (SD 0.5). Gender was associated with all parameters, with the females presenting more valgus and anteverted hips. Multivariate analysis revealed a lower NSA and fCFI and a higher FO for older individuals. Ethnicity and BMI were not associated with any parameters.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed that there is a direct relationship of age and gender to the variations in the investigated proximal femur anatomical parameters in a large cohort of healthy individuals. Those important gender-based and age-based differences might advocate for more varus and lateralized component to reproduce preoperative anatomy of male and patients older than 50 years.

Can We Avoid Implant-selection Errors in Total Joint Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

Implant selection in the operating room is a manual process. This manual process combined with complex compatibility rules and inconsistent implant labeling may lead to implant-selection errors. These might be reduced using an automated process; however, little is known about the efficacy of available automated error-reduction systems in the operating room.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) How often do implant-selection errors occur at a high-volume institution? (2) What types of implant-selection errors are most common?

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated our implant log database of 22,847 primary THAs and TKAs to identify selection errors. There were 10,689 THAs and 12,167 TKAs included during the study period from 2012 to 2017; there were no exclusions and we had no missing data in this study. The system provided an output of errors identified, and these errors were then manually confirmed by reviewing implant logs for each case found in the medical records. Only those errors that were identified by the system were manually confirmed. During this time period all errors for all procedures were captured and presented as a proportion. Errors identified by the software were manually confirmed. We then categorized each mismatch to further delineate the nature of these events.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-nine errors were identified by the software system just before implantation, representing 0.74 of the 22,847 procedures performed. In 15 procedures, the wrong side was selected. Twenty-five procedures had a femoral head selected that did not match the acetabular liner. In one procedure, the femoral head taper differed from the femoral stem taper. There were 46 procedures in which there was a size mismatch between the acetabular shell and the liner. The most common error in TKA that occurred in 46 procedures was a mismatch between the tibia polyethylene insert and the tibial tray. There were 13 procedures in which the tibial insert was not matched to the femoral component according to the manufacturer's guidelines. Selection errors were identified before implantation in all procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite an automated verification process, 0.74% of the arthroplasties performed had an implant-selection error that was identified by the software verification. The prevalence of incorrect/mismatched hip and knee prostheses is unknown but almost certainly underreported. Future studies should investigate the prevalence of these errors in a multicenter evaluation with varying volumes across the involved sites. Based on our results, institutions and management should consider an automated verification process rather than a manual process to help decrease implant-selection errors in the operating room.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Dual-position calibration markers for total hip arthroplasty: theoretical comparison to fixed calibration and single marker method

PURPOSE

Digital templating is considered a standard for total hip arthroplasty. Different means for the necessary calibration of radiographs are known. While single marker calibration with radiopaque spheres is the most common, it is associated with possible significant deviations from the true magnification of the hip. Notably, fixed magnification factors showed better results. Therefore, a dual-position calibration marker method was simulated and compared to the established methods.

METHODS

First, an empirical fixed magnification factor was identified and applied to a series of radiographs. Second, three magnification factors were generated based on sagittal patient data of 398 CT scans. These methods were compared to the fixed factor.

RESULTS

The fixed factor was 122.6%. In the clinical application, the error of the fixed factor was 2.5% while the error of the single marker was 5.2%. In the CT cohort, the mean reference factor was 120.5% in females and 120.3% in males. The reference factor was compared to sex-specific means, sex-specific linear functions, and sex-specific cubic functions. The best results were found for the linear regression model with a mean difference of 0.8% from the reference value. No proportional bias was found (p = 0.623).

CONCLUSION

The simulation of the dual-position marker method using the linear regression model showed promising results, superior to all other methods. In future studies, its clinical application should be tested.

Ideal screw positions for multiple screw fixation in femoral neck fractures - Study of proximal femur morphology in a Japanese population

BACKGROUND

Despite the fact that multiple screw fixation is a common option of surgical treatment for femoral neck fractures, there is a paucity of precise morphological study of the femoral neck. To identify appropriate positions and spacing of hip screws for multiple-screw femoral neck fracture fixation, proximal femur morphology in Japanese patients was studied.

METHOD

One hundred hips in fifty knee arthroplasty candidates were studied. Following full limb CT, defined slices were created and anatomical variables measured.

RESULT

The average neck-shaft angle was 126.5° and the distance from the subcapital line to the subchondral bone on a line parallel to the femoral neck axis (FNA) was approximately 25 mm at the superior and inferior; borders of the femoral neck. The FNA was shown to run anterior to the femoral axis (FA). The cross section of the femoral neck forms a reverse right triangle. The height and width of the neck medullary canal were equal (approximately 25 mm), with the posterior wall closer to the femoral axis than the anterior wall.

CONCLUSION

Based on these data, the anterior screw positioned just above the calcar femorale, 16 mm proximal and 27° anterior to the FA, and the posterior screw positioned 12 mm proximal and 5 mm posterior to the FA is recommended. For screws inserted with a fixed angle side-plate, ≤130° is recommended.

The impact of canal flare index on leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

The femoral stem should protrude from femur by an appropriate vertical distance to allow leg length equalization at hip arthroplasty; this distance depends on the size/shape of medullary canal and implant. The relationship between femoral morphology and achievability of leg length restoration is currently unclear. Our aim was to examine the impact of the femoral canal flare index (CFI) on the risk of leg length discrepancy (LLD) after total hip arthroplasty with different femoral stems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study cohort included 126 patients with unilateral primary total hip arthroplasty due to idiopathic osteoarthritis and three different types of implanted femoral stems. The impact of CFI on postoperative LLD was assessed with separate logistic regression model for each implant and covariables of age, gender, body mass index and femoral neck resection level.

RESULTS

Higher CFI was an independent risk factor for postoperative LLD ≥ 5 mm with odds ratio 4.5 (p = 0.03) in 49 stems with cementless metaphyseal fixation Implantcast-EcoFit®, regardless of the femoral neck resection level. CFI had no significant impact on LLD in 30 stems with cementless diaphyseal fixation EndoPlus-Zweymüller® or 47 cemented collared stems Link-SPII®. No significant difference was observed between groups in pre/postoperative WOMAC scores, postoperative radiographic LLD, subjectively reported LLD, insole use or complications after mean 6.8 years of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher CFI increases the risk of clinically detectable postoperative LLD in single-wedge femoral stems with cementless metaphyseal fixation. CFI has no significant impact on LLD in femoral stems with cementless diaphyseal fixation or cemented fixation.

Right colic artery anatomy: a systematic review of cadaveric studies

Background

Complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer may offer an oncologically superior excision compared to traditional right hemicolectomy through high vascular tie and adherence to embryonic planes during dissection, supported by preoperative scanning to accurately define the tumour lymphovascular supply and drainage. The authors support and recommend precision oncosurgery based on these principles, with an emphasis on the importance of understanding the vascular anatomy. However, the anatomical variability of the right colic artery (RCA) has resulted in significant discord in the literature regarding its precise arrangement.

Methods

We systematically reviewed the literature on the incidence of the different origins of the RCA in cadaveric studies. An electronic search was conducted as per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses recommendations up to October 2016 using the MESH terms ‘right colic artery’ and ‘anatomy’ (PROSPERO registration number CRD42016041578).

Results

Ten studies involving 1073 cadavers were identified as suitable for analysis from 211 articles retrieved. The weighted mean incidence with which the right colic artery arose from other parent vessels was calculated at 36.8% for the superior mesenteric artery, 31.9% for the ileocolic artery, 27.7% for the root of the middle colic artery and 2.5% for the right branch of the middle colic artery. In 1.1% of individuals the RCA shared a trunk with the middle colic and ileocolic arteries. The weighted mean incidence of 2 RCAs was 7.0%, and in 8.9% of cadavers the RCA was absent.

Conclusions

This anatomical information will add to the technical nuances of precision oncosurgery in right-sided colon resections.

The Modified Femoral Neck-Shaft Angle: Age- and Sex-Dependent Reference Values and Reliability Analysis

Background. The femoral neck-shaft angle (NSA) is of high importance for the diagnostics and treatment of various conditions of the hip. However, rotational effects limit its precision and applicability using plain radiographs. This study introduces a novel method to measure the femoral NSA: the modified NSA (mNSA), possibly being less susceptible against rotational effects compared to the conventional NSA. Patients and Methods. The method of measurement is described and its applicability was tested in 400 pelvis computed tomography scans (800 hips). Age- and gender-dependent reference values are given and intra- and interrater reliability are analyzed. Results. The mean age of all 400 patients (800 hips) was 54.32 years (18–100, SD 22.05 years). The mean mNSA was 147.0° and the 95% confidence interval was 146.7°–147.4°. Differences of the mNSA between sexes, age groups, and sides were nonsignificant. The absolute difference between NSA and mNSA was 16.3° (range 3–31°; SD 4.4°); the correlation was high (0.738; p < 0.001). Overall, the intra- and interrater reliability were excellent for the mNSA. Interpretation. We introduced a novel concept for the analysis of the neck-shaft angle. The high reliability of the measurement has been proven and its robustness to hip rotation was demonstrated.