A Comparison of the Medium-Term Results of Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Computer-Assisted and Conventional Techniques to Treat Patients With Extraarticular Femoral Deformities

Outcomes of Image-Free Robotic Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Who Have Valgus Knee Deformities

BACKGROUND

Valgus knee deformities pose a unique challenge in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) due to the complexity of achieving ligamentous balance and satisfactory alignment compared to varus or neutral deformities. Robotic-assisted (RA) TKA could aid in achieving improved component alignment and balance.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated a matched cohort of patients to compare image-free RA-TKA (n = 44) versus conventional manual (CM) TKA (n = 30) techniques in patients who have valgus deformity of 5 to 15 degrees, including radiographic and patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) over a 3-year period. The patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) studied to determine outcomes were: Western Ontario McMaster University Arthritis Index, Knee Society Score-Function Score, and Short Form 12-item Survey.

RESULTS

Overall, the RA-TKA cohort showed faster improvement in PROMs (37.16 ± 1 8.8 versus 25.74 ± 17.7, P = .02), shorter length of stay (1.41 versus 2.29 days, P = .02), and shorter operating room times (120.79 versus 123.67 minutes, P = .02) than CM-TK). Additionally, there was no difference in the use of primary versus varus-valgus constrained polyethylene liners between the cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

In this investigation, RA-TKA yielded a slightly faster patient recovery, more objective measurements of ligamentous balance, and proved noninferior PROMs compared to CM-TKA for preoperative valgus knee deformities.

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Computer-Assisted Navigation in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty for Patients with Extra-articular Deformity: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Computer-assisted navigation surgery (CAS) during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may help improve outcomes for patients with extra-articular deformity (EAD); however, this has not been extensively studied. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the clinical and radiological outcomes following primary TKA using CAS in patients with EAD.

Methods

We searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to March 3, 2023 for studies investigating surgical outcomes of using the navigation system for TKA to treat patients with EAD. From 14 studies, 539 knees with EAD that underwent navigation TKA were enrolled. We investigated the knee range of motion (ROM), outcome scores at final follow-up (Knee Society Score [KSS] and Knee Functional Score [KFS]), and pre- and postoperative mechanical hip-knee-ankle (mHKA) angle using lower extremity scanogram. The meta-analysis was based on the single-arm method, and all data were pooled using a random-effects model.

Results

Following our meta-analyses, the mean knee ROM changed from 87.0° (95% confidence interval [CI], 75.9°-98.1°) preoperatively to 109.4° (95% CI, 97.9°-120.8°) postoperatively. The adjusted KSS was 93.45 points (95% CI, 88.36-98.54 points), and the adjusted KFS was 91.57 points (95% CI, 86.80-96.33 points) in knees with EAD that underwent CAS-TKA. As a radiological outcome, the mHKA angle changed from 169.53° (95% CI, 166.90°-172.16°) preoperatively to 178.81° (95% CI, 178.31°-179.30°) postoperatively.

Conclusions

CAS-TKA yielded positive clinical results and demonstrated a satisfactory alignment of the lower limb's mechanical axis. CAS-TKA showed promise for primary TKA procedures, demonstrating favorable clinical and radiological outcomes even in complex cases involving EAD.

A New Concept of Using Femoral Condyles Surface for Femoral Component Alignment During Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Technical Note

Background

Orthopedic surgeons favor an intramedullary guiding system on the femoral component during total knee arthroplasty (TKA); nevertheless, improper positioning of the entry point affects the final alignment. We have designed a new femoral cutting system for TKA that uses the distal and posterior femoral condyles as reference points for the setting of the cutting system regardless of the femoral canal. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of this new guiding system.

Methods

We enrolled a series of 75 consecutive knees undergoing TKA. The alpha, gamma, and hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angles were assessed three months postoperatively. Also, surgical time and intraoperative blood loss were recorded for all patients.

Results

Fifteen patients underwent TKA using the mechanical alignment (MA) strategy, and 60 underwent kinematically aligned (KA) TKA. Both groups showed normal coronal and sagittal alignment 3 months postoperatively. The mean intraoperative blood loss was 213.11 ± 52.73 ml, which was not different between the two groups (n.s.). The mean surgical time was 43.12 ± 11.62 min, which was significantly shorter in the KA-TKA (41.11 ± 3.77 min) than in the MA-TKA (49.34 ± 4.56 min) (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Using the new guiding system with good femoral alignment, we introduced the easily palpable and available condylar surface as a new landmark for cutting the distal femur in TKA.

Level of Evidence

IV.

Postoperative limb alignment in total knee replacement. Conventional versus navigated versus robotic techniques

BACKGROUND

Our objective was to compare the coronal mechanical axis after total knee replacement (TKR) obtained in three groups of patients subjected to conventional, navigated, and robotic surgery.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis.

RESULTS

124 knees were included (36 conventional, 41 navigated, 47 robotic). No statistically significant differences were found between the postOp tibiofemoral angle of the conventional, navigated and robotic groups (p = 0.396). A repeated-measure analysis of preOp-to-postOp also found no significant differences (p = 0.387). There were no differences in the proportion of outliers (3-degree) found (p = 0.211). Nevertheless, a higher proportion of patients in the robotic group improved their mechanical alignment, as compared with conventional surgery (p = 0.023), although no differences were found when comparing with navigation (p = 0.121).

CONCLUSIONS

No statistically significant differences were found with respect to the postOp alignment achieved. However, statistically significant differences were detected between robotic and conventional surgery when considering the percentage of patients with improved limb alignment.

Navigated and Robot-Assisted Technology in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Do Outcome Differences Achieve Minimal Clinically Important Difference?

BACKGROUND

In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), computer-assisted navigation (N-TKA) and robotic-assisted methods (RA-TKA) are intended to increase precision of mechanical and component alignment. However, the clinical significance of published patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) differences in comparison to conventional TKA (C-TKA) is unknown.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed to identify all studies reporting perioperative PROMs for either primary N-TKA or RA-TKA with a C-TKA comparison cohort with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Relative improvements in PROMs for the two cohorts were compared to published minimal clinically important difference (MCID) values.

RESULTS

After systematic review, 21 studies (N = 3,214) reporting on N-TKA and eight studies (N = 1,529) reporting on RA-TKA met inclusion criteria. Eighteen of 20 studies (90%) reported improved radiographic outcomes with N-TKA relative to C-TKA; five of five studies reported improved radiographic outcomes with RA-TKA relative to C-TKA. Five of 21 studies (24%) reported statistically significant greater improvements in clinical PROMs for N-TKA relative to C-TKA, whereas only two (10%) achieved clinical significance relative to MCID on a secondary analysis. One of 8 studies (13%) reported statistically significant greater improvements in PROMs for RA-TKA relative to C-TKA, whereas none achieved clinical significance relative to MCID on a secondary analysis. No studies reported a significant difference in revision rates.

CONCLUSION

While most studies comparing RA-TKA and N-TKA with C-TKA demonstrate improved radiographic alignment outcomes, a minority of studies reported PROM differences that achieve clinical significance. Future studies should report data and be interpreted in the context of clinical significance to establish patient and surgeon expectations for emerging technologies.

The accuracy of an extramedullary femoral cutting system in total knee arthroplasty in patients with severe coronal femoral bowing: a radiographic study

BACKGROUND

Intramedullary (IM) femoral alignment instrument is imprecise for the coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients with severe lateral bowing of the femur, while the extramedullary (EM) alignment system does not depend on the structure of the femoral medullary cavity. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the accuracy of postoperative limb alignment with the two femoral alignment techniques for patients with severe coronal femoral bowing.

METHODS

From January 2017 to December 2019, patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis and coronal femoral bowing angle (cFBA) ≥ 5° who underwent total knee arthroplasty TKA at our institution were enrolled in the study. The postoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) alignment, femoral and tibial component alignment between the IM group and the EM group were compared on 5° ≤ cFBA < 10° and cFBA ≥ 10°.

RESULTS

In patients with 5° ≤ cFBA < 10°, no significant differences were observed in the EM group and IM group, including preoperative and postoperative parameters. However, when analyzing the patients with cFBA ≥ 10°, we found a significant difference in postoperative HKA (4.51° in the IM group vs. 2.23°in the EM group, p < 0.001), femoral component alignment angle (86.84° in the IM group vs. 88.46° in the EM group, p = 0.001) and tibial component alignment angle (88.69° in the IM group vs. 89.81° in the EM group, p = 0.003) between the two groups. Compared to the EM group, the IM group presents a higher rate of outliers for the postoperative HKA and femoral components.

CONCLUSIONS

The study showed that severe lateral bowing of the femur has an important influence on the postoperative alignment with the IM femoral cutting system. In this case, the application of EM cutting system in TKA will perform accurate distal femoral resection and optimize the alignment of lower limb and the femoral component.

Mid-flexion laxity could be identified with continuous flexion-arc gap assessment in patients with a large preoperative convergence angle

PURPOSE

To analyze the incidence of intraoperative mid-flexion laxity using continuous flexion-arc gap assessment, risk factors for mid-flexion laxity, and clinical results in navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

Ninety posterior-stabilized TKAs were performed under navigation guidance for patients with degenerative arthritis and varus deformity. Intraoperatively, the gap between the trial femoral component and insert was evaluated in the navigation system with continuous flexion-arc gap assessment. Each medial and lateral gap at flexion (90°) and extension (0°) were made to be less than 3 mm. Mid-flexion laxity was determined when the gap in the flexion range between 15° and 60° was 3 mm or more. The proportion of knees with mid-flexion laxity was investigated. The factors affecting mid-flexion laxity were identified in terms of demographics, preoperative convergence angle, and change in joint line height and posterior femoral offset. The Knee Society Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 31 cases (34.4%) of lateral mid-flexion laxity (average peak mid-flexion gap = 3.7 mm). The other 59 cases did not show mid-flexion laxity. The preoperative convergence angle was the only significant factor affecting lateral mid-flexion laxity (odds ratio = 1.466, p = 0.002). There were no significant differences in the clinical results between the groups with and without mid-flexion laxity.

CONCLUSIONS

The continuous flexion-arc gap assessment was useful in evaluating mid-flexion laxity using navigation-assisted TKA. The preoperative convergence angle, reflecting soft-tissue laxity, can be a practical and simple radiographic finding for predicting lateral mid-flexion laxity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Intraoperative Assessment of Gap Balancing in Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Navigation with Joint Stability Graphs

The purpose of this study was to assess continuous gaps in the replaced knee throughout the full range of motion (ROM) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using a joint stability graph, and to analyze the gap laxity in the mid-flexion range. Ninety-three TKAs were performed using imageless navigation with a joint stability graph. While positioning guides for each respective cut, the surgeon can safely preview the resection's impact for the resulting joint gaps and control the soft tissue balance at the knee flexion of 0° (extension) and 90° (flexion). The gaps between the femoral component and insert were evaluated throughout the full ROM using the joint stability graph. The mechanical axis (MA) and change of joint line height were radiographically evaluated. Posthoc power analyses using a significant α value of 0.05 were performed on the proportion of the mid-flexion instability as a primary outcome to determine whether the sample had sufficient power. The power was determined to be sufficient (100%). The flexion-extension gap differences in each medial and lateral compartment and the mediolateral gap differences in flexion and extension were all ≤3 mm. None of the knees had mid-flexion instability, which is defined by a peak mid-flexion gap that is 3 mm greater than the smaller value of flexion or extension gap. The average MA was well corrected from varus 11.4° to varus 1.0° postoperatively. The proportion of postoperative well-aligned knees (MA ≤ 3°) was 87.1%. The joint line height was well preserved (14.7 vs. 14.8 mm, p = 0.751). The joint stability graph in TKA using the navigation can effectively evaluate the continuous gap throughout the ROM, including the mid-flexion range. Mid-flexion instability was uncommon in primary TKAs with appropriate alignment and proper preservation of the joint line. The Level of evidence for the study is IV.

Comparison of risk for postoperative hyperextension between cruciate retaining and posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasties

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of postoperative hyperextension and factors affecting hyperextension needs to be investigated separately for cruciate retaining (CR) and posterior stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasties (TKAs), because the mechanism for preventing hyperextension is different according to the bearing design. The purpose of the study was to compare the incidence of postoperative hyperextension between CR and PS TKAs and analyze the factors affecting the postoperative hyperextension.

METHODS

Matched 213 CR and PS TKAs with Persona^® prosthesis were retrospectively reviewed. The preoperative demographics, clinical and radiographic knee condition, and pelvic incidence were similar between groups. Appropriate knee extension (0°-5°), confirmed with a goniometer, was achieved intraoperatively. The knee sagittal angle was radiographically measured preoperatively and at 2 years postoperative. The incidence of hyperextension (sagittal angle < - 5°) was investigated. The factors affecting the postoperative hyperextension were analyzed in terms of age, sex, preoperative mechanical axis, knee sagittal angle, postoperative posterior tibial slope (PTS), change of posterior femoral offset, and pelvic incidence.

RESULTS

The knee sagittal angle was not significantly different preoperatively between CR and PS TKAs. The postoperative knee sagittal angle was 2.9° in CR TKAs and 4.4° in PS TKAs (p = 0.004). The incidence of postoperative hyperextension was 11.7% (25/213) in CR TKAs and 4.2% (9/213) in PS TKAs (p = 0.007). The preoperative sagittal angle, postoperative PTS, and pelvic incidence were the significant factors affecting the postoperative hyperextension in CR TKAs (odds ratio 0.869, 2.205, and 1.045, respectively); the preoperative sagittal angle was only the significant factor in PS TKAs (odds ratio 0.857) CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative knee hyperextension occurred more frequently and was affected by more factors in CR TKAs than PS TKAs. Efforts to avoid hyperextension and closed observation are required in TKAs performed in patients with the risk factors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

The Use of Computer Navigation and Robotic Technology in Complex Total Knee Arthroplasty

»

The potential benefits of computer-assisted surgical (CAS) navigation and robotic total knee arthroplasty (TKA) systems, such as increased reliability of restoring the mechanical axis, fewer outliers, more rapid hospital discharge, less physical therapy requirements, decreased blood loss, and decreased revision rates, have led to their application not only in primary cases but also in complex cases such as preoperative deformity and revision.

»

Early evidence demonstrates that CAS navigation may help to improve alignment in complex cases of femoral and tibial deformity and in cases of femoral bowing.

»

Data regarding deformity correction with robotic systems are similar to CAS navigation with regard to alignment, but are more limited. There are also scant data regarding revision cases and cases of previous intramedullary canal instrumentation.

»

Concerns remain regarding cost, learning curves, and operative times. There are potential long-term cost savings associated with a decrease in revisions and readmissions that require additional investigation.

»

Early evidence for the use of these emerging technologies for deformity correction and revision cases is promising, but their impact on long-term functional outcomes remains to be demonstrated. Additional well-designed comparative studies are warranted.

Navigated total knee arthroplasty: Retrospective study of 600 continuous cases

INTRODUCTION

Computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has existed for more than 20 years, although its use has been marginal. Its benefits are still largely debated, especially its efficacy for achieving the desired postoperative alignment.

HYPOTHESIS

A neutral hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle (180°±3°) will be achieved in at least 85% of cases and there will be no difference between the different types of navigation systems used.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this retrospective, single-center, single-surgeon study, all the TKAs completed between September 2003 and December 2017 were included, giving a total of 753 navigated TKAs: Navitrack group: 196 Natural Knee II implants (Zimmer) with the Navitrack-OS Knee system (Zimmer CAS); Brainlab group: 557 implants (196 Profix, Smith & Nephew and 361 LCS, DePuy) with the Brainlab Vector Vision system. The aim of navigation was independent of the preoperative alignment and was always to achieve a neutral HKA mechanical axis (180°±3°). The primary endpoint was the postoperative HKA angle. This parameter was used to determine whether the navigation objective was achieved, to define how many patients were outliers and to compare navigation systems to each other. The potential influence of sex, body mass index (BMI) and preoperative deformity were secondary aims. Lastly, the final navigation values were compared to radiological data to detect any potential deviations.

RESULTS

We analyzed 600 of the cases, 160 in the Navitrack group and 440 in the Brainlab group (152 Profix and 288 LCS). A neutral HKA angle was found in 91% patients: 93% for the Navitrack group and 90% in the Brainlab group (90.8% Profix and 89.6% LCS). There was no significant difference between groups (p=0.68), nor between subgroups (p=0.85). An elevated BMI negatively influenced the ability to achieve a neutral HKA (p=0.015), regardless of the system used.

CONCLUSION

In our study of 600 TKA cases done with navigation, the postoperative alignment goal (HKA 180°±3°) was achieved in 91% of cases. There was no difference between navigation systems. Patients with a high BMI were more likely to be outliers (p=0.015).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Congenital Fibular Deficiency: Total Knee Arthroplasty with Extraarticular Deformity: A Case Report

CASE

A total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was performed on a 35-year-old man with congenital fibular deficiency and a 20° varus and 28° antecurvatum tibial deformity of the left lower limb.

CONCLUSION

One-stage TKA and correction of the extraarticular deformity by means of intraarticular bone resections and a standard soft tissue release were performed to restore the limb's mechanical axis. Patients with congenital fibular deficiency present a wide range of limb deformities because of bone deficiencies or treatment sequels, which might require a specific surgical technique and small-sized implants to obtain good results during a TKA.

No differences in mid- to long-term outcomes of computer-assisted navigation versus conventional total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Accurate implant position in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can potentially lead to better long-term functional outcomes and implant survival. Recent studies on whether better clinical results could be obtained from computer-navigated or conventional TKA were inconclusive. In addition, recent reviews only included short-term follow-up studies without performing quantitative mid- to long-term follow-up analysis. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing mid- to long-term clinical outcomes (such as knee scoring and functional results) and radiological outcomes (such as normal alignment of the limb axis or component) between computer-navigated TKA and conventional TKA to determine which method of TKA could obtain better clinical and radiological results.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, and SCOPUS electronic databases were searched for relevant articles published through August 2018 that compared outcomes of computer-navigated TKA and conventional TKA. Data search, extraction, analysis, and quality assessment were performed according to the Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. Clinical and radiological outcomes of both techniques were evaluated using various outcome measures.

RESULTS

Seven randomized controlled trials were included. Based on Knee Society Scores, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, pain, and range of motion, there were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the two techniques. Based on outliers from the normal axis, outliers of femoral components in the coronal plane, and outliers of tibial components in the coronal plane, radiologic outcomes showed no significant differences between the two techniques either.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study revealed that there were no significant differences in clinical or radiological outcomes between computer-navigated TKA and conventional TKA. It remains unclear which TKA technique yields better results in terms of mid- to long-term clinical and radiological outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.