Effect of Periarticular Morphine Injection for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial

Cocktail of Ropivacaine, Morphine, and Diprospan Reduces Pain and Prolongs Analgesic Effects after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

Local infiltration analgesia (LIA) provides postoperative analgesia for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the analgesic effect of a cocktail of ropivacaine, morphine, and Diprospan for TKA.

Methods

A total of 100 patients from September 2018 to February 2019 were randomized into 2 groups. Group A (control group, 50 patients) received LIA of ropivacaine alone (80 ml, 0.25% ropivacaine). Group B (LIA group, 50 patients) received an LIA cocktail of ropivacaine, morphine, and Diprospan (80 ml, 0.25% ropivacaine, 0.125 mg/ml morphine, and 62.5 μg/ml compound betamethasone). The primary outcomes were the levels of inflammatory markers C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), pain visual analog scale (VAS) scores, opioid consumption, range of motion (ROM), functional tests, and sleeping quality. The secondary outcomes were adverse events, satisfaction rates, HSS scores, and SF-12 scores. The longest follow-up was 2 years.

Results

The two groups showed no differences in terms of characteristics (P  >  0.05). Group B had lower resting VAS pain scores (1.54 ± 0.60, 95% CI = 1.37 to 1.70 vs. 2.00 ± 0.63, 95% CI = 2.05 to 2.34) and active VAS pain scores (2.64 ± 0.62, 95% CI = 2.46 to 2.81 vs. 3.16 ± 0.75, 95% CI = 2.95 to 3.36) within 48 h postoperatively than Group A (P < 0.001), while none of the pain differences exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Group B had significantly lower CRP levels (59.49 ± 13.01, 95% CI = 55.88 to 63.09 vs. 65.95 ± 14.41, 95% CI = 61.95 to 69.94) and IL-6 levels (44.11 ± 13.67, 95% CI = 40.32 to 47.89 vs. 60.72 ± 15.49, 95% CI = 56.42 to 65.01), lower opioid consumption (7.60 ± 11.10, 95% CI = 4.52 to 10.67 vs. 13.80 ± 14.68, 95% CI = 9.73 to 17.86), better ROM (110.20 ± 10.46, 95% CI = 107.30 to 113.09 vs. 105.30 ± 10.02, 95% CI = 102.52 to 108.07), better sleep quality (3.40 ± 1.03, 95% CI = 3.11 to 3.68 vs. 4.20 ± 1.06, 95% CI = 3.90 to 4.49), and higher satisfaction rates than Group A within 48 h postoperatively (P  <  0.05). Adverse events, HSS scores, and SF-12 scores were not significantly different within 2 years postoperatively.

Conclusions

A cocktail of ropivacaine, morphine, and Diprospan prolongs the analgesic effect up to 48 h postoperatively. Although the small statistical benefit may not result in MCID, the LIA cocktail still reduces opioid consumption, results in better sleeping quality and faster rehabilitation, and does not increase adverse events. Therefore, cocktails of ropivacaine, morphine, and Diprospan have good application value for pain control in TKA. This trial is registered with ChiCTR1800018372.

Periarticular infiltration used in total joint replacements: an update and review article

Periarticular infiltration following total knee and hip arthroplasty has been demonstrated to be equivalent to peripheral nerve blocks for postoperative pain management. The ideal cocktail has not been established yet. We have conducted a literature search on PubMed and Embase. Our search criteria included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews (SRs). We tried to only include the most recent studies to keep the information current. The included research focused at Dexmedetomidine, Liposomal Bupivacaine, Ropivacaine, Epinephrine, Ketorolac, Morphine, Ketamine and Glucocorticosteroids. Each medication's mode of action, duration, ideal dosage, contraindications, side effects and effectiveness have been summarized in the review article. This article will help the clinician to make an informed evidence-based decision about which medications to include in their ideal cocktail.

Analgesic Trends in the Management of Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparison of Peri-Articular Infiltration, Adductor Canal Block, and Adjuvant Treatment for Posterior Knee Pain

The rising number of total knee arthroplasties (TKA's) in the United States increases demand for perioperative pain modalities, which can promote early mobilization and discharge. Over the decades, a focus has shifted from opioid-dominant regimens to motor-sparing multimodal protocols, which have not only improved pain scores and reduced opioid consumption but also improved overall patient outcomes. In this article, we briefly review the evolution of post-operative pain management in patients undergoing TKA and summarize the literature on the most popular modalities currently used including periarticular injections, adductor canal blocks, distal selective nerve blocks, as well as liposomal bupivacaine as part of a multimodal approach.

A multimodal intraosseous infusion of morphine and ketorolac decreases early postoperative pain and opioid consumption following total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Multimodal pain management regimens and intraosseous infusion of morphine are two novel techniques that show promise in decreasing postoperative pain and opioid consumption following total knee arthroplasty. However, no study has analyzed the intraosseous infusion of a multimodal pain management regimen in this patient population. The purpose of our investigation was to examine the intraosseous administration of a multimodal pain regimen comprised of morphine and ketorolac during total knee arthroplasty with regard to immediate and 2-week postoperative pain, opioid pain medication intake, and nausea levels.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study with comparisons to a historical control group, 24 patients were prospectively enrolled to receive an intraosseous infusion of morphine and ketorolac dosed according to age-based protocols while undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Immediate and 2-week postoperative Visual Analog Score (VAS) pain scores, opioid pain medication intake, and nausea levels were recorded and compared against a historical control group that received an intraosseous infusion of morphine alone.

RESULTS

During the first four postoperative hours, patients who received the multimodal intraosseous infusion experienced lower VAS pain scores and required less breakthrough intravenous pain medication than those patients in our historical control group. Following this immediate postoperative period, there were no additional differences between groups in terms of pain levels or opioid consumption, and there were no differences in nausea levels between groups at any time.

CONCLUSIONS

Our multimodal intraosseous infusion of morphine and ketorolac dosed according to age-based protocols improved immediate postoperative pain levels and reduced opioid consumption in the immediate postoperative period for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.

Periarticular Injection in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Optimal pain management after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can expedite postoperative recovery, improve perioperative outcomes, and increase patient satisfaction. Periarticular injections (PAIs) have become increasingly used to improve pain management after TKA. Similar to peripheral nerve blocks, the use of intraoperative PAIs can lower pain scores and expedite discharge from the hospital. However, there is notable variability in the ingredients and administration techniques of PAIs. Currently, no standard of care exists for PAIs, especially in the setting of adjuvant peripheral nerve blocks. This study seeks to evaluate the ingredients, administration techniques, and outcomes of PAIs used during TKA.

Effects of Adding Morphine to Periarticular Infiltration Analgesia Combined with Single Dose Epidural Morphine in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Study

OBJECTIVE

Morphine plays an important role in postoperative analgesia after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there are limited data that investigate the administration ways of morphine. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding morphine to periarticular infiltration analgesia (PIA) combined with single-dose epidural morphine for the patients undergoing TKA.

METHODS

In total, 120 patients with knee osteoarthritis who underwent the primary TKA from April 2021 and March 2022 were randomized into three groups (a cocktail containing morphine with single-dose epidural morphine [Group A]; a cocktail containing morphine [Group B]; and a cocktail free of morphine [Group C]). The three groups were compared based on the Visual Analog Score at rest and during motion, requirement of tramadol, functional recovery including quadriceps strength and range of motion, and adverse events including nausea and vomiting and local and systemic adverse events. The repetitive measure analysis of variance and chi-square test among three groups were used to analyze the results.

RESULTS

Analgesia strategy in Group A (0.4 ± 0.8, and 0.9 ± 1.0 points, respectively) significantly reduced rest pain at 6 and 12 h after surgery relative to Group B (1.6 ± 1.2, and 2.2 ± 1.4 points, respectively) (p < 0.001), and the analgesic effect of Group B was stronger than that of Group C (2.1 ± 0.9, and 2.6 ± 0.9 points, respectively) (p < 0.05). Rest pain at 24 h after surgery was significantly lower in Group A (2.5 ± 0.8 points) and B (1.9 ± 1.0 points) than in Group C (2.5 ± 0.8) (p < 0.05). Within 24 h after surgery, the requirements for tramadol in Group A (0.25 g) and Group B (0.35 g) were significantly lower than those in Group C (0.75 g) (p < 0.05). Within 4 days of surgery, the quadriceps strength in the three groups increased gradually, and no statistical significance was noted among the three groups (p > 0.05). From the second day to the fourth day after surgery, although the three groups showed no statistical difference in the range of motion, the result of Group C was inferior to that of the other two groups. There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and metoclopramide consumption among the three groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

PIA combined with single-dose epidural morphine effectively reduces early postoperative pain and tramadol requirement as well as few complications, which can become a safe and effective measure to improve postoperative pain after TKA.

The effect and safety of periarticular multimodal drug injection without morphine and epinephrine in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Background

Periarticular multimodal drug injection (PMDI) is a safe and effective pain management technique after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR); however, adding morphine and epinephrine sometimes causes adverse effects. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy of PMDI without morphine and epinephrine after ACLR.

Methods

This retrospective matched case-control study included patients who had undergone primary double-bundle ACLR with PMDI and were then matched one-to-one with a control group without PMDI based on sex, age, and body mass index using propensity-matched analysis. The following clinical outcomes were compared between the groups: visual analog scale (VAS) score, C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration, number of times the patients used additional analgesics, complication rate, and postoperative time to achieve straight leg raise (SLR).

Results

Twenty-nine patients with PMDI and 29 controls were enrolled. The VAS score at 1 day postoperatively was lower in the PMDI than the control group (1.93  ±  1.44 vs. 3.41  ±  1.75, respectively; P < 0.001). The CRP concentration at 1 and 3 days was lower in the PMDI than the control group (0.46  ±  0.47 vs. 1.00  ±  0.69 mg/dL, P < 0.001; and 1.93  ±  1.71 vs. 4.01  ±  2.55 mg/dL, P < 0.001, respectively). The average number of additional analgesics used was significantly lower in the PMDI than the control group. There were no significant differences in the frequency of occurrence of postoperative complications between the two groups. The number of patients who could achieve SLR within 1 day was 27/29 (93%) in PMDI group, which was significantly higher than the control group (12/29, 41%) ( P < 0.001).

Conclusion

PMDI without morphine and epinephrine after ACLR reduced patients’ subjective pain level, objective inflammatory response without complications and enabled patients to achieve early functional recovery.

Intraosseous Morphine Decreases Postoperative Pain and Pain Medication Use in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Intraosseous (IO) infusion of medication is a novel technique for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) antibiotic prophylaxis. To decrease postoperative pain in TKA patients, we investigated addition of morphine to a standard IO antibiotic injection.

METHODS

A double-blind, randomized controlled trial was performed on 48 (24 each) consecutive patients undergoing primary TKA. The control group received an IO injection of antibiotics as per the standard protocol. The experimental group received an IO antibiotic injection with 10 mg of morphine. Pain, nausea, and opioid use were assessed up to 14 days postoperatively. Morphine and interleukin-6 serum levels were obtained 10 hours postoperatively in a subgroup of 20 patients.

RESULTS

The experimental group had lower Visual Analog Scale pain score at 1, 2, 3, and 5 hours postoperatively (P = .0032, P = .005, P = .020, P = .010). This trend continued for postoperative day 1, 2, 8, and 9 (40% reduction, P = .001; 49% reduction, P = .036; 38% reduction, P = .025; 33% reduction, P = .041). The experimental group had lower opioid consumption than the control group for the first 48 hours and second week postsurgery (P < .05). Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement scores for the experimental group showed significant improvement at 2 and 8 weeks postsurgery (P < .05). Serum morphine levels in the experimental group were significantly less than the control group 10 hours after IO injection (P = .049).

CONCLUSION

IO morphine combined with a standard antibiotic solution demonstrates superior postoperative pain relief immediately and up to 2 weeks. IO morphine is a safe and effective method to lessen postoperative pain in TKA patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, Level 1.

Adductor canal block combined with local infiltration analgesia with morphine and betamethasone show superior analgesic effect than local infiltration analgesia alone for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Background

Local infiltration analgesia (LIA) and adductor canal block (ACB) provide postoperative analgesia for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). ACB blocks the saphenous nerve and has smaller impacts on quadriceps muscle weakness. ACB theoretically does not have enough analgesic effects on posterior sensory nerves. LIA may increase its analgesic effects on the posterolateral knee. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether ACB combined with a LIA cocktail of ropivacaine, morphine, and betamethasone has superior analgesic effect than LIA for TKA.

Methods

A total of 86 patients were assessed for eligibility from February 2019 to May 2019. 26 of those were excluded, and 60 patients were divided into 2 groups by computer-generated random number. Group A (LIA group) received LIA cocktail of ropivacaine, morphine and betamethasone. Group B (LIA+ ACB group) received ultrasound-guided ACB and LIA cocktail of ropivacaine, morphine and betamethasone. Postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) resting or active pain scores, opioid consumption, range of motion (ROM), functional tests, complications and satisfaction rates were measured. The longest follow-up was 2 years.

Results

Two groups have no differences in terms of characteristics, preoperative pain or function (P > 0.05). ACB combined with LIA had significantly lower resting and active VAS pain scores, better ROM, better sleeping quality and higher satisfaction rates than LIA alone within 72 h postoperatively (P < 0.05). Complications, or adverse events and HSS score, SF-12 score were observed no significant differences within 2 years postoperatively.

Conclusions

Adductor canal block combined with Local infiltration analgesia provide better early pain control. Although the small statistical benefit may not result in minimal clinically important difference, Adductor canal block combined with Local infiltration analgesia also reduce opioid requirements, improve sleeping quality, and do not increase the complication rate. Therefore, Adductor canal block combined with Local infiltration analgesia still have good application prospects as an effective pain management for total knee arthroplasty.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1900021385, 18/02/2019.

The Efficacy and Safety of Glucocorticoid on Periarticular Infiltration Analgesia in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the effect and safety of multimodal cocktail protocols implemented with or without glucocorticoids on periarticular infiltration analgesia (PIA) in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

We comprehensively searched the PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to November 2020 for randomized controlled trials on glucocorticoids as a component of the cocktail protocol used in PIA for patients with TKA.

RESULTS

Our meta-analysis included 11 randomized controlled trial studies with 1051 primary TKAs (930 patients). Visual analog scale scores at postoperative day (POD) 1 and POD 2 in the glucocorticoid groups were significantly lower than those in the control group (95% CI [-1.01--0.10], P = .02; 95% CI [-0.51--0.13], P = .001). Furthermore, the glucocorticoid group was associated with a statistically significant improvement in the range of motion at POD 1 (95% CI [3.20-8.05] P < .00001), reduction in total morphine consumption at 24 hours, and lower levels of C-reactive protein on POD 2/3 compared with the control group. However, neither the length of hospital stays nor the long-term Knee Society Knee Score showed any differences between the two groups. In addition, the results of subgroup analyses favored triamcinolone acetonide over betamethasone, methylprednisolone, and dexamethasone regarding the postoperative visual analog scale scores and range of motion.

CONCLUSION

Glucocorticoid supplementation in PIA is effective and does not increase complications or side effects for patients with either unilateral or bilateral TKA. Moreover, triamcinolone acetonide could be recommended in multimodal cocktail protocols for glucocorticoid supplementation.

Tranexamic acid in a periarticular multimodal cocktail injection for blood management in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study

Background

This study aimed to assess the efficacy of tranexamic acid (TXA) mixed in a periarticular multimodal cocktail (PAMC) as a topical administration and to determine whether combined use of intravenous and topical administration is more effective than a single administration of TXA.

Methods

A total of 240 patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was enrolled for this prospective randomized controlled study. Patients were divided into three groups of 80 patients each. Baseline data were comparable for all groups. Average follow-up was 18.7 months. Group 1 consisted of patients who received intravenous (IV) TXA, Group 2 patients were those who received TXA in a PAMC injection for topical administration, and Group 3 consisted of patients who received a combination of both intravenous and topical administration of TXA. Primary outcomes were postoperative hemoglobin drop and amount of suction drainage. Secondary outcomes were estimated blood loss (EBL), postoperative transfusion rate, and complications.

Results

The mean postoperative hemoglobin drop was significantly lower in Group 3 (2.13 ± 0.77 g/dL, p=0.004), and there was no difference between Group 1 and Group 2 (2.56 ± 1.07 g/dL vs 2.55 ± 0.86 g/dL, p=0.999). The mean drainage amount was significantly lower in Group 3 (326.58 ± 57.55 ml, p<0.001), and there was no difference between Group 1 and Group 2 (367.93 ± 87.26 ml vs 397.66 ± 104.10 ml, p=0.072). Similarly, the mean EBL was significantly lower in Group 3 (p=0.003), and there was no significant difference between Group 1 and Group 2 (p=0.992). There were no significant differences in requirement for postoperative transfusion rate or incidence of complications among the three groups.

Conclusion

TXA mixed in a PAMC injection showed a similar effect to IV administration of TXA following TKA. Furthermore, combined use of both IV and PAMC injection provided better perioperative bleeding control with similar safety in patients without relevant comorbidities.

Trial registration

WHO ICTRP identifier KCT0005703. Retrospectively registered: 12/24/2020

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04551-8.

Assessing outcome in postoperative pain trials: are we missing the point? A systematic review of pain-related outcome domains reported in studies early after total knee arthroplasty

ABSTRACT

The management of acute postoperative pain remains suboptimal. Systematic reviews and Cochrane analysis can assist with collating evidence about treatment efficacy, but the results are limited in part by heterogeneity of endpoints in clinical trials. In addition, the chosen endpoints may not be entirely clinically relevant. To investigate the endpoints assessed in perioperative pain trials, we performed a systematic literature review on outcome domains assessing effectiveness of acute pain interventions in trials after total knee arthroplasty. We followed the Cochrane recommendations for systematic reviews, searching PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase, resulting in the screening of 1590 potentially eligible studies. After final inclusion of 295 studies, we identified 11 outcome domains and 45 subdomains/descriptors with the domain "pain"/"pain intensity" most commonly assessed (98.3%), followed by "analgesic consumption" (88.8%) and "side effects" (75.3%). By contrast, "physical function" (53.5%), "satisfaction" (28.8%), and "psychological function" (11.9%) were given much less consideration. The combinations of outcome domains were inhomogeneous throughout the studies, regardless of the type of pain management investigated. In conclusion, we found that there was high variability in outcome domains and inhomogeneous combinations, as well as inconsistent subdomain descriptions and utilization in trials comparing for effectiveness of pain interventions after total knee arthroplasty. This points towards the need for harmonizing outcome domains, eg, by consenting on a core outcome set of domains which are relevant for both stakeholders and patients. Such a core outcome set should include at least 3 domains from 3 different health core areas such as pain intensity, physical function, and one psychological domain.

Is medial pivot total knee arthroplasty suitable for patients with valgus knee osteoarthritis?

PURPOSE

Medial pivot total knee arthroplasty (MP-TKA) is characterized by the ball-in-socket medial tibiofemoral articulation to achieve low wear and to reproduce the medial pivot motion similar to that in the normal knee, and there have been reports of favorable long-term postsurgical outcomes. However, most of these cases concerned varus knees, and the outcomes of MP-TKA in valgus knees are unknown. The objective of this study was to investigate the postoperative outcomes in end-stage valgus knee OA patients who underwent MP-TKA, through comparisons with those who underwent TKA using the same prosthesis for varus deformity.

METHODS

This retrospective, single-center, cohort study analyzed 171 knees of 121 patients who were divided into two groups (valgus knee group: 15 knees (13 patients), varus knee group: 156 knees (109 patients)). Primary outcome measures included the knee joint range of motion (evaluated preoperatively and at every year postoperatively). Secondary outcomes included operative time, laboratory data, estimated blood loss, clinical outcome measures and adverse events.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in age, sex and body mass index, as well as in the postoperative primary and secondary outcome measures between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The use of MP-TKA featuring ball-in-socket medial tibiofemoral articulation in patients with valgus knee OA showed equally favorable clinical outcomes more than 2 years after surgery, compared to patients with varus knees who received MP-TKA.

How effective is periarticular multimodal drug injection in open elbow arthrolysis? A prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Evidence on the efficacy and safety of periarticular multimodal drug injection (PMDI) in open elbow arthrolysis (OEA) is limited. This study aimed to investigate differences in postoperative pain, blood loss, and range of motion (ROM) between PMDI vs. no injection among patients undergoing OEA, and the presence of PMDI-related complications.

METHODS

This prospective, double-blind randomized controlled trial included 59 patients who underwent OEA. Patients randomly received PMDI (ropivacaine, epinephrine, ketoprofen) before wound closure or no injection. The primary outcomes were elbow pain over the first postoperative week at rest and during motion, measured using the visual analog scale (VAS). VAS scores were compared to attain the 20-mm threshold values for a minimum clinically important difference. Parecoxib consumption on OEA night and postoperative days (PODs) 1-3 and total consumption during the first postoperative week were recorded. Blood loss was recorded every 24 hours until POD 3. ROM during rehabilitation was measured daily from day 1 to day 7 after surgery, as well as at 3-month follow-up. Medication-related side effects were recorded prospectively.

RESULTS

The mean VAS score showed clinically important differences between PMDI and control groups at rest on OEA night (mean difference [MD], 25 mm; P < .001) and first 3 PODs with motion (POD 1: MD, 28 mm, P < .001; POD 2: MD, 21 mm, P < .001; POD 3: MD, 21 mm, P < .001) but not in other postoperative assessments. Parecoxib consumption was lower in the PMDI group on OEA night and PODs 1-3. Total parecoxib consumption during the first postoperative week was lower in the PMDI group vs. the control group (MD, 148 mg; P < .001). Blood drainage was less in the PMDI group vs. the control group on POD 1 (MD, 38 mL; P = .016) but not on POD 2 (P = .950), POD 3 (P = .259), or total (P = .184). The PMDI group exhibited significantly better ROM during the first 4 PODs than the control group, whereas there was no difference at 3-month follow-up. No medication-related side effects were noted in the PMDI group.

CONCLUSION

PMDI effectively relieves pain and reduces analgesic consumption for OEA patients, without an apparent increase in risks.

Acetaminophen, bupivacaine, Duramorph, and Toradol: A comparison of chondrocyte viability and gene expression changes in osteoarthritic human chondrocytes

BACKGROUND

A multitude of chemical agents are currently used intra-articularly to decrease pain after orthopaedic procedures including total knee arthroplasty. However, the possible deleterious effects of these injectable chemicals on chondrocyte viability have not been weighed against their potential benefits. Using a human osteoarthritic chondrocyte model, the purpose of this study was to assess the potential for cartilage damage caused by bupivacaine, Toradol, Duramorph, and acetaminophen from surgical local anesthesia.

METHODS

Human distal femur and proximal tibia cross sections were obtained during total knee arthroplasty and divided into control group and experimental groups treated by bupivacaine, Toradol, Duramorph, and acetaminophen respectively. Chondrocytes obtained from enzymatically digested cartilage were cultured using a 3D alginate bead culture method to ensure lower rates of dedifferentiation. Chondrocyte bead cultures were exposed to the study chemicals. The gene expression and chondrocyte viability were measured by RT-PCR and flow cytometry, respectively.

RESULTS

Compared with untreated group bupivacaine treatment led to the greatest cellular apoptosis with 30.5 ± 11% dead cells (P = 0.000). Duramorph and acetaminophen did not result in a significant increase in cell death. Bupivacaine treatment led to an increase in Caspase 3 gene expression (P = 0.000) as well as the acetaminophen treatment (P = 0.001) when compared to control.

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrated that Duramorph and Toradol were not cytotoxic to human chondrocytes and may be better alternatives to the frequently used and more cytotoxic bupivacaine. Acetaminophen did not result in increased cell death; however, it did show increased caspase 3 gene expression and caution should be considered.

Does Surgical-site Multimodal Drug Injection After Palmar Plating of Distal Radius Fractures Improve Pain Scores?

BACKGROUND

Although palmar locked plating is a stable fixation method frequently used to treat unstable distal radius fractures (DRFs), surgical treatment may be painful, and so interventions to decrease that pain might improve our patients' experiences with surgery. Some surgeons use local multimodal drug injections to decrease postoperative pain after lower-extremity arthroplasty, but little is known about the effectiveness of a local multimodal drug injection in patients who undergo palmar plating for DRFs.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Do patients who receive a local multimodal drug injection after palmar plating for unstable DRFs have better pain scores at 4, 8, 24, and 48 hours after surgery than patients who have not received such an injection? (2) Do patients who receive a local multimodal drug injection have lower fentanyl consumption and administration of anti-emetic drugs within the first 48 hours after surgery than patients who have not received such an injection?

METHODS

A randomized controlled study was performed between August 2018 and August 2019 at a single tertiary care referral center. Patients who underwent palmar plating for DRFs under general anesthesia were eligible for inclusion. Patients were allocated into two groups: Those who received a local multimodal drug injection, and those who did not receive an injection. During the study period, 101 patients treated with palmar plating for DRFs met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled and randomized. Fifty-two patients were allocated to the multimodal injection group and 49 were allocated to the control group. Three patients (two in the multimodal injection group and one in the control group) were excluded after randomization because their pain level was not registered at any timepoint and so they could not be analyzed; our analysis was by intention to treat, and there was no crossover. After palmar plating, patients in the multimodal injection group received an injection of ropivacaine (10 mL), morphine (5 mL), ceftezole (5 mL) as well as normal saline (5 mL) to the periosteal area, pronator quadratus muscle, subcutaneous area, and skin. There were no differences between the groups in terms of age (62 years ± 13 years in the multimodal injection group versus 62 years ± 11 years in the control group; p = 0.93), gender (84% [42 of 50] women in the multimodal injection group versus 77% [37 of 48] women in the control group; p = 0.39), hand dominance (70% [35 of 50] dominant wrist in the multimodal injection group versus 60% [29 of 48] dominant wrist in the control group; p = 0.32) and AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification (p = 0.57). All patients underwent treatment with the same perioperative protocol, and 25 μg of fentanyl was injected intravenously when a patient complained of pain and asked for additional pain control after surgery. In addition, when a patient complained of nausea or vomiting associated with fentanyl use, an anti-emetic drug was also injected. All nursing staff who administered the analgesics and anti-emetic drugs were blinded to treatment allocation. These two groups were compared regarding their pain level using a 100-mm VAS at 4, 8, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively. The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for the VAS score was set to 20 mm. VAS scores were also collected by nursing staff who remained blinded to the treatment allocation. The total amount of fentanyl use and the number of patients who received anti-emetic drugs associated with administration of fentanyl within the first 48 hours were also recorded.

RESULTS

With an MCID of 20 points, we found no clinically important reduction in VAS scores among patients who received a local multimodal injection compared with those who did not receive an injection at 4 hours (34 ± 15 versus 41 ± 20, mean difference -7.079 [95% CI -13.986 to -0.173]; p = 0.045), 8 hours (27 ± 16 versus 40 ± 19, mean difference -12.263 [95% CI -19.174 to -5.353]; p = 0.001), 24 hours (18 ± 12 versus 29 ± 20, mean difference -11.042 [95% CI -17.664 to -4.419]; p = 0.001), and 48 hours (9 ± 8 versus 10 ± 6, mean difference -1.318 [95% CI -4.000 to 1.365]; p = 0.33). Within the first 48 hours after surgery, fentanyl consumption was lower in patients receiving a local multimodal injection than in control patients (25 μg [range 0-100 μg] versus 37.5 μg [range 0-125 μg], difference of medians -12.5; p = 0.01). There was also a difference between the study groups in terms of the proportion of patients who received anti-emetic medications (16% [8 of 50] in the multimodal injection group versus 35% [17 of 48] in the control group, odds ratio = 2.879 [95% CI 1.102 to 7.519]; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that patients who received a surgical-site multimodal analgesic injection after palmar plating for a distal radius fracture had no clinically important reduction in pain scores, but they did consume lower doses of opioid analgesics and fewer of these patients received anti-emetic drugs within 2 days of surgery. The high-potency opioids or other analgesia usually used for postoperative pain management have many side effects. Thus, reducing additional analgesia is as important as postoperative pain management and a surgical-site multimodal analgesic injection is one of the methods to achieve this a goal.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, therapeutic study.

Initiating range of motion exercises within 24 hours following total knee arthroplasty affects the reduction of postoperative pain: A randomized controlled trial

Background

Postoperative limitations in the range of motion (ROM) after TKA may occur occasionally and restrict a patient's ADL. Although ROM exercise is a means of increasing the ROM after TKA, the optimal time of initiating ROM exercise is still unclear. The purpose of this study is to examine different initiation timings of postoperative ROM exercises after TKA and to compare the results in terms of postoperative pain, swelling, and ROM improvement to determine the optimal time of initiating ROM exercises following TKA.

Methods

This was a prospective, single-center, single-blinded randomized controlled trial involving 109 patients scheduled for unilateral TKA. All patients underwent the physiotherapist assisted passive and active same rehabilitation program that only differed in the starting time of ROM exercise on postoperative day 1 or day 7. Postoperative assessment was performed with all attending personnel blinded to group assignment. Visual analog scale (VAS) of pain, ROM, thigh swelling, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, and adverse outcomes were compared between groups on postoperative days within 2 years after surgery.

Results

VAS scores during the postoperative period from 18 to 72 h were significantly lower in the group with starting time of ROM exercise on postoperative day 1. The ROM, laboratory data, thigh girth, WOMAC and the incidence of complications did not differ between the two groups at any postoperative time-point.

Conclusions

The results of this study suggested that ROM exercises beginning in the early postoperative stage are advantageous in reducing the postoperative pain after TKA.

Effect of morphine added to multimodal cocktail on infiltration analgesia in total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The local injection of multimodal cocktail is currently commonly used in the treatment of postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It is still inconclusive whether the morphine added to the intraoperative injection mixture could make some difference. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of additional morphine injection on postoperative analgesia in TKA, and provide some useful information on morphine usage in clinical practice.

METHODS

The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, Chinese biomedical literature database (CBM), and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases were systematically searched. Of 623 records identified, 8 RCTs involving 1093 knees were eligible for data extraction and meta-analysis according to criteria included.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis showed that the use of local morphine injection was not associated with significant pain relief within 48 hours postoperatively at rest and on motion (P > .05, all). The use of morphine reduced postoperative total systemic opioids consumption (P < .05). This study found no significant differences in other outcomes including knee flexion range of motion (ROM) (P > .05), extension ROM (P > .05), The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores (P > .05), Post-operative nausea and vomiting occurrence (P > .05) regardless of the presence of morphine or not in the injections.

CONCLUSION

Additional morphine added to multimodal cocktail did not decrease the postoperative pain scores significantly based on our outcomes, but it reduced the systemic postoperative opioids consumption in total knee arthroplasty.

Efficacy of Single-Shot Adductor Canal Block Combined With Posterior Capsular Infiltration on Postoperative Pain and Functional Outcome After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study

BACKGROUND

Adductor canal block (ACB) may preserve muscle strength and promote faster recovery than other methods of analgesia following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there are contradictory reports on the efficacy of ACB. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of single-shot ACB combined with posterior capsular infiltration (PCI) vs multimodal periarticular infiltration analgesia in treating postoperative pain.

METHODS

This study involved patients undergoing unilateral primary TKA at our institution from January 2018 to January 2019. Patients were randomized into 2 groups, one of which was treated with ACB combined with PCI, and the other with periarticular infiltration analgesia. Primary outcomes included postoperative pain as assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS) and consumption of morphine hydrochloride. The secondary outcome was functional recovery, as assessed by range of knee motion, quadriceps strength, and daily ambulation distance. Tertiary outcomes included the duration of hospital stay and postoperative adverse effects.

RESULTS

Patients treated with ACB and PCI had lower resting VAS scores at 8 and 24 hours after surgery, and lower VAS scores during motion within 48 hours after surgery. Patients treated with ACB and PCI also consumed less morphine. There was no difference in functional recovery, duration of hospitalization, or incidence of adverse events.

CONCLUSION

The ACB combined with PCI can reduce postoperative pain sooner after TKA without affecting postoperative functional recovery and increasing complications.

Effect of periarticular morphine injection for total hip arthroplasty: a randomised, double-blind trial

BACKGROUND

The periarticular multimodal cocktail injection is currently commonly used to treat postoperative pain after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Despite its analgesic effect, it is frequently reported to cause nausea and vomiting, which are adverse effects of opioids. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of morphine as a component of a multimodal cocktail injection for providing postoperative analgesia and alleviating swelling in patients who underwent THA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective, single-centre, randomised controlled trial involving 100 patients scheduled for unilateral THA. A mixture of steroids, local anaesthetics, NSAIDs, and epinephrine with or without morphine (0.1 mg/kg), was injected into randomly assigned patients. Postoperative assessment was performed with all attending personnel and patients blind to group assignment. Visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain, range of motion (ROM), nausea numerical rating scale (NRS), the total dose of antiemetic drugs used and thigh swelling were compared between groups on postoperative days.

RESULTS

Pain VAS scores both at rest and on motion did not differ between the 2 groups at any postoperative time-point. The nausea NRS scores during the postoperative period from 0 minutes to 1 hour and the total dose of antiemetic drugs administered were significantly higher in the morphine group. The thigh girth showed no difference between groups on any of the postoperative days.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggested that addition of morphine to the multimodal cocktail injection after THA is not effective for relieving postoperative pain, alleviating swelling, or improving ROM, and results in nausea and vomiting. Randomised controlled trial registration number UMIN000022668.

The effect of morphine added to periarticular multimodal drug injection or spinal anesthesia on pain management and functional recovery after total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of morphine added to periarticular multimodal drug injection (PMDI) for pain management after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is controversial. Adding morphine to spinal anesthesia has reportedly improved pain relief for the first 24 h. We examined the effect of morphine added to PMDI or spinal anesthesia on pain management and functional recovery after TKA.

METHODS

A total of 97 patients were randomized into three groups: in Group A (34 patients), 10 mg morphine was added to PMDI; Group B (31 patients), 0.1 mg morphine was added to spinal anesthesia; and Group C (32 patients), morphine was added to neither the PMDI nor spinal anesthetic. To evaluate the efficacy of added morphine for pain management, we assessed rest pain, the number of times analgesics were used, and the time period until the first analgesic use. The adverse effects of morphine were assessed by counting the numbers of times vomiting occurred and antiemetics were used. Functional recovery was evaluated by recording the range of motion of the knee and the date of ability to walk.

RESULTS

Rest pain was the least in Group B at 6 and 12 h after operation. The number of times analgesics were used was the least in Group B. The time period until the first analgesic use was the longest in Group B. The number of vomiting episodes was the least in Group C. The number of times antiemetics were used was higher in Group A than in Group C. There were no significant differences in the range of motion and date of ability to walk among the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of morphine added to PMDI was limited, and that of morphine added to spinal anesthesia disappeared within 20 h postoperatively. Adding morphine to PMDI or spinal anesthesia did not improve functional recovery and caused some adverse effects.

Local Efficacy of Periarticular Morphine Injection in Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial

BACKGROUND

The periarticular multimodal cocktail injection including morphine is currently commonly used to reduce postoperative pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Despite its analgesic effect, it frequently causes nausea, which is an adverse effect of opioids. It is inconclusive whether the intraoperative injection of periarticular morphine is effective peripherally. The aim of this study was to assess whether the addition of morphine to unilateral periarticular knee injections improves postoperative pain, range of motion, and swelling in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral TKA.

METHODS

A prospective, single-center, double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial was conducted to assess the local efficacy of adding morphine to intraoperative periarticular anesthesia in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral TKA. Fifty-three patients undergoing 106 TKAs received an intraoperative periarticular injection in randomly selected one knee with added morphine (0.1 mg/kg) and the other knee without added morphine. The periarticular injection was composed of ropivacaine (a local anesthetic), epinephrine, ketoprofen, and methylprednisolone sodium. Visual analog scale pain scores at rest and on motion, range of motion (ROM), thigh swelling, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score, and adverse outcomes were compared between the 2 knees.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in the visual analog scale score, ROM, thigh girth, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score, and adverse events between the 2 sides.

CONCLUSION

Adding morphine to periarticular injections is ineffective locally for relieving pain, reducing swelling, and improving the postoperative ROM.