Fall Risk Score at the Time of Discharge Predicts Readmission Following Total Joint Arthroplasty

Total Joint Arthroplasty Is Associated With a Decreased Risk of Traumatic Falls: An Analysis of 499,094 Cases

INTRODUCTION

The rate of traumatic falls in the aging cohort is estimated to increase across the United States. We sought to determine whether patients with lower extremity osteoarthritis (OA) who underwent total joint arthroplasty (TJA) had a reduced risk of falling compared with those with OA who did not undergo TJA.

METHODS

The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database was queried from 2000 to 2015 to identify 499,094 cases with primary diagnosis of hip or knee OA. Patients were stratified into 4 cohorts: group 1 (hip OA with total hip arthroplasty [THA] [N = 168,234]), group 2 (hip OA without THA [N = 22,482]), group 3 (knee OA with total knee arthroplasty [TKA] [N = 275,651]), and group 4 (knee OA without TKA [N = 32,826]). Patients were followed up longitudinally to evaluate the long-term risks of subsequent traumatic falls. Cox proportional hazards models were conducted to examine the relationship between patients' demographics and clinical characteristics and the risk of subsequent traumatic falls and reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).

RESULTS

Nineteen thousand seven hundred seventeen patients with hip OA underwent 168,234 primary THAs (88.2%), and 308,477 patients with knee OA underwent 275,651 primary TKAs (89.4%) during the period 2000 to 2015. Compared with patients without TJA, those who underwent TJA were at a decreased risk of falls (THA HR 0.56 [95% CI, 0.48 to 0.66]) and TKA HR 0.66 [95% CI, 0.57 to 0.76]). Compared with age 40 to 49 years, risk increases for ages 70 to 79 years (HR = 4.3, 95% CI: 2.8 to 6.6) and 80 years or older (HR = 5.5, 95% CI: 3.8 to 8.1).

CONCLUSION

TJA is associated with a decreased risk of long-term traumatic falls in elderly patients with the primary diagnosis of hip or knee osteoarthritis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III Retrospective Case-control study.

Association between disease-specific anxiety at discharge and functional outcome in patients after total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Patients who undergo total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may experience disease-specific problems, including decline in motor function and intense pain, which may result in disease-specific anxiety. This study aimed to investigate disease-specific anxiety at discharge, and any association between anxiety and functional outcomes following TKA.

METHODS

The study prospectively included 129 patients who had undergone TKA. Each patient's disease-specific anxiety about wounds, pain, gait, and falling was assessed at discharge using a numerical rating scale, in which 0 represented no anxiety and 10 represented the highest level of anxiety. In addition, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were evaluated using the Knee Society Score (KSS) at six-months postoperatively. The effects of disease-specific anxiety at discharge were evaluated with the KSS at six-months postoperatively and analyzed separately using multiple regression analysis.

RESULTS

The median score for anxiety about wounds, pain, and gait was 4.0 (IQR 2.0-5.0) at discharge five days after surgery. The median score for anxiety about falling was also 4.0 (IQR 2.0-6.0). The level of anxiety regarding wounds, pain, gait, and falling was negatively associated with the KSS six-months postoperatively after adjusting for all confounding factors (wounds: β = -2.8, 95% CI -4.3 to -1.3; pain: β = -3.4, 95% CI -4.9 to -1.9; gait: β = -4.3, 95% CI -5.8 to -2.9; falling: β = -2.5, 95% CI -3.9 to -1.1).

CONCLUSION

Patients reported similar levels of anxiety regarding wounds, pain, gait, and falling at discharge after TKA. The severity of anxiety symptoms at discharge was negatively associated with PROs six-months postoperatively.

Testing the Predictive Validity of the Hendrich II Fall Risk Model

Cumulative data on patient fall risk have been compiled in electronic medical records systems, and it is possible to test the validity of fall-risk assessment tools using these data between the times of admission and occurrence of a fall. The Hendrich II Fall Risk Model scores assessed during three time points of hospital stays were extracted and used for testing the predictive validity: (a) upon admission, (b) when the maximum fall-risk score from admission to falling or discharge, and (c) immediately before falling or discharge. Predictive validity was examined using seven predictive indicators. In addition, logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors that significantly affect the occurrence of a fall. Among the different time points, the maximum fall-risk score assessed between admission and falling or discharge showed the best predictive performance. Confusion or disorientation and having a poor ability to rise from a sitting position were significant risk factors for a fall.