1
|
Grover P, Karuppan CM. The lower limb-loss rehabilitation continuum (LLRC) - a framework for program design and implementation. Disabil Rehabil 2024; 46:1652-1661. [PMID: 37147928 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2207221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
Purpose: The multistep journey to prosthetic device-enabled functioning following amputation requires a structured approach for optimal care delivery, but such program structures and outcomes are inadequately characterized. The study is responsive by describing an implementation framework for lower limb loss rehabilitation and evaluating its utility.Materials and methods: The lower limb loss rehabilitation continuum framework (LLRC) was developed using literature-based continuum of care and amputation phase concepts as well as input from limb loss rehabilitation stakeholders. LLRC structure includes five sequential steps (Postsurgical Stabilization (PS), Preprosthetic Rehabilitation (PPR), Limb Healing and Maturation (LHM), Prosthetic Fitting (PF), Prosthetic Rehabilitation (PR)) between six touchpoints of patient-healthcare interaction (Surgery, Preprosthetic Rehabilitation Admission and Discharge, Functioning Evaluation and Prescription, Prosthetic Rehabilitation Admission and Discharge). The utility of this framework was evaluated through LLRC program implementation in a semiurban US setting and program functioning and process outcomes assessment from an IRB-approved, retrospective observational study about patients with unilateral lower-limb amputations completing this program.Results: Program functional (FIM gain; efficiency) scores were greater for PPR(32.6(8);3.1) compared with PR(24.3(8.5);3.8). Program completion duration was 149.7(63.4) days. LHM(75.8(58.5) days) and PF(51.4(24.3) days) were the longest steps. PR duration was significantly longer(p = 0.033) for the transfemoral level.Conclusion: The LLRC framework is useful for the design and implementation of structured limb loss rehabilitation programs.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe lower limb-loss rehabilitation continuum (LLRC) is a novel implementation framework with a five-step structure from limb loss to completion of prosthetic rehabilitation between six touchpoints of patient-healthcare interaction, with standardized terminology and baseline and outcome metrics. The utility of the program was demonstrated by successful program development in a suburban health setting and actionable process outcomes and superior functioning outcomes compared with literature.The LLRC can be adapted by health systems, institutions, and care providers for program development. Programs can expect high FIM gains and efficiency for Preprosthetic rehabilitation and Prosthetic rehabilitation steps. With an LLRC completion time of 5 months, long Limb healing and maturation and Prosthetic fitting steps present areas of opportunity for improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prateek Grover
- Mercy Clinics and Mercy Rehabilitation Hospital, Springfield, MO, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Factors associated with infection recurrence after two-stage exchange for periprosthetic hip infection. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS 2022; 46:953-961. [PMID: 35129644 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-022-05333-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Two-stage exchange is the treatment of choice for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Factors and outcomes associated with infection recurrence for hip PJI are limited. The primary aim of this study was to determine factors associated with infection recurrence after two-stage exchange. Secondary aims were survival, mobility, and the EuroQol five-dimension scale (EQ-5D-5L) health state. METHODS We retrospectively investigated patients with two-stage exchange for hip PJI at our institution from 2006 to 2017. Follow-up was conducted for a minimum of four years after the reimplantation. RESULTS We included 135 patients with 139 hip PJIs. The mean age of the patients was 69.6 years (range 32-88). The infection recurrence rate was 14.4% (n = 20) after a mean follow-up of 8.0 years (range 4.0-13.1). Four factors for recurrence were identified at the time of the first stage: previous orthopaedic diagnoses (p < 0.001), type of explanted prosthesis (p = 0.004), cultured microorganisms (p = 0.033), and sinus tract (p = 0.035). A longer surgical reimplantation time (p = 0.015) was the only one factor found at the second stage. The estimated Kaplan-Meier survival for the total sample was 9.0 years (95% confidence interval 8.3-9.8), without significant difference for those with infection recurrence compared to recurrence-free patients (log-rank 0.931). At the time of follow-up, 89 patients were alive. For these patients, Parker mobility score (p = 0.102), EuroQol five-dimensional scale (p = 0.099), and EQ Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) (p = 0.027) were inferior in those with infection recurrence, but significance was found only for VAS. CONCLUSION In this study with mid- to long-term follow-up, five factors for infection recurrence were identified. Recurrence did not affect survival, but health-related quality of life was inferior compared to recurrence-free patients. The results suggest that the period of the first stage including previous orthopaedic diagnoses requires more consideration in the future.
Collapse
|
3
|
Significance of nutritional status in the development of periprosthetic infections : A retrospective analysis of 194 patients. DER ORTHOPADE 2021; 50:188-197. [PMID: 32424439 PMCID: PMC7925508 DOI: 10.1007/s00132-020-03922-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malnutrition caused by protein and vitamin deficiencies is a significant negative prognostic factor in surgical wound healing disorders and infections. Particularly in elective surgery, preoperative compensation of deficiencies is advisable to avoid negative postoperative consequences. This study examined the nutritional and protein balance of patients with periprosthetic hip and knee joint infections. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients with periprosthetic hip or knee joint infections constituted the study group (SG). Control group I (CG I) included patients with primary implants and CG II included patients who required revision surgery because of aseptic loosening. Relevant nutritional and protein parameters were determined via analysis of peripheral venous blood samples. In addition, a questionnaire was used to evaluate the nutritional and eating patterns of all patients. The nutritional risk screening (NRS) 2002 score and body mass index (BMI) were also calculated for all participants. RESULTS Differences were found in the albumin level (SG: 36.23 ± 7.34, CG I: 44.37 ± 3.32, p < 0.001, CG II: 44.06 ± 4.24, p < 0.001) and total protein in serum (SG: 65.42 ± 8.66, CG I: 70.80 ± 5.33, p = 0.004, CG II: 71.22 ± 5.21, p = 0.004). The number of patients with lowered albumin levels (SG 19/61, CG I 1/78, CG II 2/55) and total protein in serum (SG: 12/61, CG I 5/78, CG II 2/55) also showed considerable variation. The number of patients with a NRS 2002 score ≥3 differed significantly between SG and both CGs (SG: 5/61, CG I 1/78, CG II 0/55); however, these differences could not be confirmed using BMI. CONCLUSION As expected, lowered albumin and total protein levels were observed in PJI due to the acute phase reaction. The NRS can be performed to exclude nutritional deficiency, which cannot be excluded based on BMI. In cases of periprosthetic joint infection it is reasonable to compensate the nutritional deficiency with dietary supplements.
Collapse
|
4
|
Contemporary 2-Stage Treatment of Periprosthetic Hip Infection with Evidence-Based Standardized Protocols Yields Excellent Results: Caveats and Recommendations. J Arthroplasty 2020; 35:2983-2995. [PMID: 32540305 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.05.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Revised: 05/05/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study quantified the effectiveness of contemporary and evidence-based standardized 2-stage treatment for periprosthetic hip infection. Findings illustrate potential limitations of criticisms of 2-stage protocols and potential consequences of adopting single-stage protocols before definitive data are available. METHODS Fifty-four consecutive hips treated with 2-stage resection and reimplantation were retrospectively reviewed. Standardized protocols were adhered to including implant resection, meticulous surgical debridement, antibiotic spacer, 6-week intravenous antibiotics, a 2-week drug holiday, and laboratory assessment of infection eradication before reimplantation. After reimplantation, patients were placed on prophylactic intravenous antibiotics until discharge and discharged on oral antibiotics for a minimum of 7 days until intraoperative cultures were final. Successful treatment was defined per Delphi-based International Multidisciplinary Consensus. RESULTS The overall treatment success rate was 95.7% (44 of 46 cases) with mean infection-free survivorship of 67.2 (range, 23.8-106.4) months. Success rates were 100% for early and acute hematogenous infections regardless of host type and 100% for chronic infections in uncompromised hosts. 95% (19/20) of chronic infections in compromised hosts and 83.3% (5/6) of chronic infections in significantly compromised hosts were successfully treated. About 4% of primary hips and 20% of revision hips required repeat debridement and spacer exchange after initial resection. No patients died because of treatment. CONCLUSION Details from this consecutive series of patients undergoing 2-stage treatment for hip infection suggest that some criticisms of 2-stage treatment as well as some arguments in support of single-stage treatment may be overstated. Promotion and uncritical adoption of single-stage treatment protocols are discouraged until further and more definitive data exist.
Collapse
|
5
|
Coughlan A, Taylor F. Classifications in Brief: The McPherson Classification of Periprosthetic Infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2020; 478:903-908. [PMID: 31977434 PMCID: PMC7282566 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000001133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Coughlan
- A. Coughlan, F. Taylor, The Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| | - Fraser Taylor
- A. Coughlan, F. Taylor, The Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Matharu GS, Mouchti S, Twigg S, Delmestri A, Murray DW, Judge A, Pandit HG. The effect of smoking on outcomes following primary total hip and knee arthroplasty: a population-based cohort study of 117,024 patients. Acta Orthop 2019; 90:559-567. [PMID: 31370730 PMCID: PMC6844375 DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1649510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose - Smoking is a modifiable risk factor that may adversely affect postoperative outcomes. Healthcare providers are increasingly denying smokers access to total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA) until they stop smoking. Evidence supporting this is unclear. We assessed the effect of smoking on outcomes following arthroplasty.Patients and methods - We identified THAs and TKAs from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, which were linked with datasets from Hospital Episode Statistics and the Office for National Statistics to identify outcomes. The effect of smoking on postoperative outcomes (complications, medications, revision, mortality, patient-reported outcome measures [PROMs]) was assessed using adjusted regression models.Results - We studied 60,812 THAs and 56,212 TKAs (11% smokers, 33% ex-smokers, 57% non-smokers). Following THA, smokers had an increased risk of lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) and myocardial infarction compared with non-smokers and ex-smokers. Following TKA, smokers had an increased risk of LRTI compared with non-smokers. Compared with non-smokers (THA relative risk ratio [RRR] = 0.65; 95% CI = 0.61-0.69; TKA RRR = 0.82; CI = 0.78-0.86) and ex-smokers (THR RRR = 0.90; CI = 0.84-0.95), smokers had increased opioid usage 1-year postoperatively. Similar patterns were observed for weak opioids, paracetamol, and gabapentinoids. 1-year mortality rates were higher in smokers compared with non-smokers (THA hazard ratio [HR] = 0.37, CI = 0.29-0.49; TKA HR = 0.52, CI = 0.34-0.81) and ex-smokers (THA HR = 0.53, CI = 0.40-0.70). Long-term revision rates were not increased in smokers. Smokers had improvement in PROMs compared with preoperatively, with no clinically important difference in postoperative PROMs between smokers, non-smokers, and ex-smokers.Interpretation - Smoking is associated with more medical complications, higher analgesia usage, and increased mortality following arthroplasty. Most adverse outcomes were reduced in ex-smokers, therefore smoking cessation should be encouraged before arthroplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gulraj S Matharu
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford; ,Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol; ,Correspondence:
| | - Sofia Mouchti
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol;
| | - Sarah Twigg
- Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, St Luke’s Hospital, Bradford; ,Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, Chapel Allerton Hospital and University of Leeds, Leeds;
| | - Antonella Delmestri
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford;
| | - David W Murray
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford;
| | - Andrew Judge
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford; ,Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol; ,National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR Bristol BRC), University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, University of Bristol, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Hemant G Pandit
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford; ,Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, Chapel Allerton Hospital and University of Leeds, Leeds;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
An Analysis of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Service Payment in Maryland: Can a Global Budget Revenue Model Save Money in Lower Extremity Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 2019; 34:201-205. [PMID: 30389256 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2018] [Revised: 10/01/2018] [Accepted: 10/03/2018] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Maryland is the only state utilizing the Global Budget Revenue (GBR) model to reduce costs. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the GBR payment model effectively reduced the following: (1) costs of inpatient hospital stays; (2) post-acute care costs; (3) lengths of stay (LOS); (4) readmission rates; and (5) discharge disposition in patients who underwent primary total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA). METHODS We evaluated the Maryland Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Service database for THAs and TKAs performed at 6 hospitals 1 year prior to (2012) and after the initiation of GBR (2015). We compared differences in costs for each inpatient care episode, post-acute care periods (total costs, acute rehabilitation, short-term nursing facility, home health, durable medical equipment), readmissions, LOS, and discharge disposition. RESULTS Hospitals had a significant reduction in mean inpatient care costs for THA and TKA (P < .0001). There was a significant reduction in total post-acute care costs following THA (P < .001). Home healthcare had a significant increase in cost following THA and TKA (P < .0001). There was a significant reduction in durable medical equipment costs for THA (P < .0001). There was a significant decrease in LOS for THA and TKA (P < .0001). There was a significant increase in patients discharged home (THA, P = .0262; TKA, P = .0058). CONCLUSION The Maryland healthcare model may be associated with a reduction in inpatient and post-acute care costs. Furthermore, implementation of GBR may result in reductions in LOS and readmission rates.
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Despite the development of newer preventative measures, the rate of infection continues to be approximately 1% for patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The extent of the infection can range from a mild superficial infection to a more serious periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). PJIs not only play a significant role in the clinical well-being of the TJA patient population, but also have substantial economic implications on the health care system. Several approaches are currently being used to mitigate the risk of PJI after TJA. The variety of prophylactic measures to prevent infection after TJA must be thoroughly discussed and evaluated.
Collapse
|
9
|
Kurowicki J, Rosas S, Khlopas A, Newman JM, Law TY, Roche MW, Higuera CA, Mont MA. Impact of Perioperative HbA1c on Reimbursements in Diabetes Mellitus Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Nationwide Analysis. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33:2038-2042. [PMID: 29891083 PMCID: PMC6383765 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.01.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2017] [Revised: 01/22/2018] [Accepted: 01/29/2018] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients who have diabetes mellitus (DM) are at an increased risk of postoperative complications following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Therefore, much interest has been paid to perioperative glycemic control. However, no prior studies have evaluated the patient variation of HbA1c levels on costs. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of obtaining preoperative HbA1c levels on (1) day of surgery (DOS) cost; (2) subsequent 89-day costs; and (3) global 90-day cost. METHODS A retrospective query of the Humana insurance claims database was performed from 2007 to 2015 for all DM patients undergoing THA. Only patients with HbA1c (%) levels within 3 months before or after the THA were included. Patients were stratified into 6 groups based on HbA1c starting at 5.5% and increasing by 1% increments to 11.5%; one additional group (11.5%-20%) for extreme cases was analyzed. Correlations between HbA1c level and reimbursements for DOS, subsequent 89-day, and global 90-day period were performed. RESULTS HbA1c level demonstrated a significant correlation to DOS (correlation coefficient = 0.664), subsequent 89-day (correlation coefficient = 0.789), and global 90-day period (correlation coefficient = 0.747) costs. DOS, 89-day, and global 90-day costs significantly increased with increasing HbA1c levels (P < .0001). CONCLUSION Higher perioperative HbA1c levels increase the DOS, subsequent 89-day, and global 90-day costs of THA. This was expected as these patients require multidisciplinary care, have longer LOS, and develop more complications. Further investigation into postoperative complications based on glycemic control is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Kurowicki
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Health and Medical Sciences, Seton Hall University, South Orange, NJ,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Holy Cross Orthopedic Institute, Fort Lauderdale, FL
| | - Samuel Rosas
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Holy Cross Orthopedic Institute, Fort Lauderdale, FL,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Anton Khlopas
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Jared M. Newman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY
| | - Tsun yee Law
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Holy Cross Orthopedic Institute, Fort Lauderdale, FL
| | - Martin W. Roche
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Holy Cross Orthopedic Institute, Fort Lauderdale, FL
| | | | - Michael A. Mont
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH,Reprint requests: Michael A. Mont, MD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue/A40, Cleveland, OH 44195
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kheir MM, Kheir YNP, Tan TL, Ackerman CT, Rondon AJ, Chen AF. Increased Complications for Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder Patients Undergoing Total Joint Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33:1462-1466. [PMID: 29310919 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2017] [Revised: 12/04/2017] [Accepted: 12/05/2017] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although it has been shown that anxiety and depression are associated with increased complications after total joint arthroplasty (TJA), the outcomes of TJA in patients with a history of psychosis are unknown. This study evaluated the influence of bipolar and schizophrenic disorders on complications after TJA, particularly aseptic and septic revisions. METHODS A retrospective review of 156 TJAs (125 primaries and 31 revisions) was performed at a single institution from 2000 to 2015. Bipolar and schizophrenic patients were identified based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes or by those actively taking anti-psychotic medications, followed by manual chart review to confirm diagnoses. The psychosis patient cohort was matched 3:1 for a variety of factors. Revisions and readmissions were evaluated. Survivorship curves were generated. RESULTS Patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder had an increased odds of developing peri-prosthetic joint infection at 90 days (odds ratio [OR] 3.34, P = .049), 2 years (OR 3.94, P = .004), and at any time point (OR 4.32, P = .002). Psychosis patients had increased odds of aseptic and mechanical revisions at all endpoints, particularly from dislocation. Psychosis patients had a higher number of post-operative emergency department visits (P < .001), and were more likely to be discharged to a rehabilitation facility (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Patients with bipolar affective disorder or schizophrenia may have multiple barriers to self-care after TJA, and are at an increased risk for undergoing revision TJA for prosthetic joint infection and mechanical causes. Increased pre-operative education and screening of this patient population may be necessary prior to performing TJA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael M Kheir
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - You Na P Kheir
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Timothy L Tan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Colin T Ackerman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Alexander J Rondon
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Antonia F Chen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|