Are the Outcomes of Revision Knee Arthroplasty for Flexion Instability the Same as for Other Major Failure Mechanisms?

Rate of complications and short-term Functional Results of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Tibio-femoral Instability: do stability and range of motion are restored in 62 revisions

BACKGROUND

Tibio-femoral instability (TFI) due to ligament imbalance is a growing cause of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The results are heterogeneous in the event of revision and literature is scarce regarding this issue particularly when use of hinge prostheses is not exclusive to manage this complication. Therefore, a retrospective investigation was conducted aiming to (1) analyze the one-year functional results, (2) determine the rate of complications after revision for TFI using posterior-stabilized or condylar constrained knees (CCK), 3) identify the factors that could influence the function outcome.

HYPOTHESIS

Patients undergoing revision TKA for TFI would show an improvement in Oxford Knee Score at one year postoperative.

METHODS

Sixty-two patients were included (40 females, 22 males) mean age 62,9 years ± 8.2 (range, 45,7-78,4). Instability was classified as instability in extension (n = 28), midflexion (n = 12), flexion (n = 12) or global (n = 15). Revisions were done because of isolated instability. Revision consisted in implant revision using a CCK (n = 42), a hinge prosthesis (n = 12) or an isolated polyethylene insert exchange (n = 8). Patients were assessed at one year by the difference between the preoperative Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and the score at one year postoperatively. The results were deemed satisfactory if the variation between preoperative OKS and one-year follow-up was greater than or equal to 5 points (Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) following TKA). Complication rate and risk factors influencing the outcome were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 62 patients, 59 could be assessed at one year using postoperative OKS (one death at 0.66 years from unrelated reason, and two had repeated revision within one year postoperative [1 aseptic loosening and 1 Co-Cr allergy]). Preoperative OKS was 15.5 points ± 7.1 (range, 2-37), rising to 28.9 points ± 8.7 (range, 11-45) at follow-up. The mean OKS improvement was 13.4 points ± 10.3 (range, -8 to 33) (p < 0.001) and 47 patients (79.6%) reached the MCID at follow-up. Female gender was associated with a worse evolution of OKS (-5.8, 95% CI: -11.26 to -0.34 (p = 0.038)). In contrast, there was no significant difference in the evolution of the OKS according to the type of TFI in extension or in flexion, in midflexion or global (p = 0.5). Likewise, there was no significant difference in the evolution of the OKS between RTKA using CCK, hinged prosthesis or isolated polyethylene insert exchange (p = 0.3). There was no recurrence of instability at final follow-up (3.04 years ± 1.5 (range, 0.66-6.25)). Revision for instability did not drive to stiffness since mean flexion prior to RTKA was 116 ° ± 13 ° (range, 90 ° to 130 °) versus 116.7 ° ± 12 ° (range, 90 ° to 130 °) at follow-up. Fourteen patients (22.6%) experienced postoperative complications, including 3 revisions (4.8%) at final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

RTKA for TFI leads to significant functional improvement at one-year postoperative. However, the risk of complications is almost high at 22.6%.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; retrospective study.

The Definition and Diagnostic Criteria for Flexion Instability after Total Knee Arthroplasty is Highly Variable in the Published Literature

INTRODUCTION

Flexion instability (FI) is increasingly being recognized as a common reason for failure after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the diagnosis remains loosely defined and is often described by a constellation of symptoms and findings with the exclusion of other clinical entities. The purpose of this study was to examine the definition and diagnostic criteria of FI used in the current peer-reviewed literature.

METHODS

Clinically oriented primary research articles reporting on patients who have FI after TKA and published in English from 2010 to 2023 were systematically identified. Included publications were independently evaluated by multiple reviewers to determine how FI was defined. Of papers that defined FI, the diagnostic criteria were evaluated for several metrics including clinical symptoms, physical exam findings, aspiration results, lab evaluations, and radiographic parameters.

RESULTS

Of 19 eligible articles, only 58% clearly defined FI, with significant variation among studies. Of these publications, 89% directly described clinical symptoms and physical examination findings that aided in diagnosis. Also, 74% of authors described using radiographic analysis, 53% used aspiration, and 47% used lab values to aid in excluding other causes of failure such as periprosthetic joint infection. Only 16% of authors distinguished FI from mid-flexion instability.

CONCLUSION

Less than two-thirds of clinical studies focusing on patients who have FI after TKA provided a clear, concrete definition of FI. The use of aspiration, lab values, and radiographic factors was highly variable. Importantly, many authors defined the diagnosis loosely without objective criteria, which may hinder comparison between clinical studies. A standardized definition of FI could improve research and clinical care on this topic.

Fellowship-Trained Surgeons Experience a Learning Curve Performing Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) and revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) require considerable surgical proficiency, but are frequently delegated to the least experienced surgeons. This study examined the influence of surgeon experience on revision outcomes.

METHODS

Prospective data on confirmed aseptic rTHAs (n = 122) and rTKAs (n = 195) performed by 4 fellowship-trained surgeons in the same practice were retrospectively analyzed. Surgeons were grouped based on years in practice (inexperienced [IE] first 2 years, early experience [EE] 4 to 6 years, and senior experience [SE] 15 to 17 years). Procedure duration, estimated blood loss (EBL), and reoperation rates were compared, controlling for potential covariates.

RESULTS

Procedure durations varied based on surgeon experience for 3 of 4 rTHA diagnoses (P ≤ 0.001). Relative to the SE surgeon, procedure duration was 80.0 (95% confidence interval 61.7 to 98.4, P < 0.001) minutes longer for IE surgeons and 30.9 (95% confidence interval 17.5 to 44.3, P < 0.001) minutes longer for the EE surgeon. Procedure durations also varied based on surgeon experience for 3 of 4 rTKA diagnoses (P < 0.001), with the longest durations for IE surgeons. Procedure durations varied based on the interaction of surgeon experience, patient age, and body mass index. The EBL did not differ in rTHA based on surgeon experience (P = 0.978), but did differ for rTKA (P = 0.004). There were 25% of rTHAs performed by IE surgeons compared to 15.5% for the EE surgeon and 3.6% for the SE surgeon that underwent reoperation within a year of the index procedure (P = 0.064), with significantly more reoperations for the same indication among IE and EE surgeons (P = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

Complex procedures completed by less experienced surgeons may result in longer procedures, higher EBL, and more early reoperations. Study findings implicate a learning curve for revision arthroplasty that continues for several years, warranting consideration of existing patient allocation and referral patterns.

Etiology and prosthesis model have no influence in the functional outcomes of total knee arthroplasty revision surgery at five years

Background

The rising number of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) replacements and their uncertain functional results according to the revision etiology and the prosthesis model implanted are a challenge for orthopedic surgeons and patients. A better knowledge of these results is mandatory to make the best decision. We present our clinical outcomes with a 5-year follow-up.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 104 patients, 108 knees (77 aseptic and 31 septic), who underwent TKA revision surgery from 2007 to 2017 with three different models of prosthesis. KSS score, range of motion (ROM), pain, and independence for walking were recorded at 5 years according to our own database and the clinical interview and compared to the different models of prosthesis and the etiology of the revision.

Results

The results showed 81.5 % of good or excellent functional outcomes in our patients with a mean KSS score of 76,7 ± 14,3, a mean ROM of 1.68 ± 0.30 radians, and 77 % of them are independent for walking without any aids. The results do not show any difference between the groups comparing the model of prosthesis and the etiology of the revision surgery.

Conclusions

At 5 years, TKA revision surgery offers good clinical and functional outcomes, independence for walking, good range of motion, and low residual pain regardless of the cause of the revision or the model of prosthesis.

Clinical Outcomes of Isolated Polyethylene Exchange Versus Full Component Revision for the Management of Instability Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Instability following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common cause for revision. Isolated polyethylene exchange (IPE) can be performed to increase knee joint stability, but results have been mixed. The purpose of this study was to compare the survivorship and patient-reported outcomes of patients undergoing revision TKA for instability with IPE versus full component revision.

METHODS

We reviewed 280 primary TKAs undergoing revision TKA for instability. There were 181 knees that underwent revision with IPE, compared to 99 knees treated with full component revision. The mean follow-up was 32.8 months (range, 24.8 to 82.5). Patient demographics, radiographic parameters, prosthesis constraints, reoperations for instability, and patient-reported outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

The survivorship for instability was significantly higher at 2 years (99 versus 92%, P = .024) and 5 years (94 versus 84%, P = .024) for patients undergoing full component revision. Although there was no difference in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacements and Veterans RAND 12 physical component scores between the 2 groups at 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery, full revision patients reported greater pain relief (P = .006) and greater improvements in Veterans RAND 12 physical component scores (P = .027) at 1 year and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacements scores at 2 years (P = .017) compared to IPE patients. Men were associated with an increased risk for recurrent instability following IPE (hazard ratio 3.3, 95% confidence interval: [1.0 to 10.6]).

CONCLUSIONS

Isolated polyethylene exchange was not as reliable or durable compared to full component revision for the management of postoperative instability. These procedures should only be reserved in cases with competent collaterals and when component position, offset, and rotation are optimized.

Recurrent Periprosthetic Joint Infections: Diagnosis, Management, and Outcomes

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains one of the most common complications after total joint arthroplasty. It is challenging to manage, associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and is a financial burden on the health care system. Failure of 2-stage management for chronic PJI is not uncommon. Repeat infections are oftentimes polymicrobial, multiple drug-resistant microorganisms, or new organisms. Optimizing the success of index 2-stage revision is the greatest prevention against failure of any subsequent management options and requires a robust team-based approach.

Evaluation of anterior translation in total knee arthroplasty utilizing stress radiographs

BACKGROUND

Flexion instability is a common cause for revision after total knee arthroplasty (TKA); however, little objective criteria exist to determine excessive laxity in flexion. This study sought to determine the reliability of stress radiographs for flexion laxity using manual stress as well as a commercially available flexion stress device, with the hypothesis that a commercially available force device would provide increased translation compared to manual stress, and radiographic measurements would be reproducible.

METHODS

Ten patients who previously underwent TKA with non-hinged components were prospectively and consecutively enrolled at a single center to undergo stress radiographs. Three lateral radiographs with the knee at 90° of flexion were obtained for each patient: rest, commercial stress device at 150N, and manual stress. Calibrated radiographs were evaluated by two raters, and inter-rater and intra-rater reliability were determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).

RESULTS

Ten patients (seven female) with mean age 72 (range 55-82) years and average duration from surgery 36 (range 12-96) months were evaluated. The commercial stress device provided significantly less anterior translation than manual stress (- 0.3 mm vs. 3.9 mm; p < 0.01). Two patients reported pain with use of the stress device. Inter-observer reliability of measurements was good for commercial stress (ICC = 0.86) and excellent for manual stress (ICC = 0.94). Eighty-five percent of measurements were within 1 mm between observers. Intra-observer reliability of measurements was good to excellent for both the stress device and manual stress.

CONCLUSIONS

Lateral stress radiographs may assist in the objective evaluation of flexion instability. A commercially available product provided less translation than manual stress; however, measurements were reliable and reproducible between observers. Further research is required to correlate translation with stress radiographs to patient outcomes following revision arthroplasty.

The Role of Constraint in Revision Total Knee Replacement for Instability: Full Component Revision Vs Isolated Polyethylene Exchange in Selected Patients

Background

Instability is a common indication for revision after total knee arthroplasty. Replacement of multiple components is the current standard, but isolated polyethylene liner exchange (IPE) may present a less-morbid alternative. This study aims to determine (1) whether IPE results in similar rerevision frequency to component revision in select patients with symptomatic instability and (2) the effect of increasing constraint on the outcome.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 117 patients revised for symptomatic total knee arthroplasty instability from January 2016 to December 2017. The component revision (60 patients) or IPE (57 patients) cohorts were further stratified based on whether constraint was increased or not. The primary objective was to compare rerevision rates 2 years after component revision vs IPE. The secondary objectives consisted of evaluating reasons for rerevision, preoperative and postoperative patient-reported outcome measures, and range of motion.

Results

The rerevision rate was 18%, with no statistical difference between component and IPE cohorts. Cases where level of constraint increased due to revision, a significantly lower rate of rerevision was detected (9 of 77) (12%) than in cases where constraint did not increase (12 of 39) (31%) (P=0.012). This association was also noted in the component revision cohort but not in the IPE cohort (P=0.011).

Conclusions

Rerevision occurred at similar frequencies 2 years after IPE or component revision for total knee arthroplasty instability. For component revision, increased constraint was associated with significantly fewer rerevisions.

Mid-Flexion Instability After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Diagnosis, Implant Design, and Outcomes

Mid-flexion instability (MFI) in total knee arthroplasty refers to a distinct clinical entity where the knee is stable at full extension and 90° of flexion, but unstable somewhere between these 2 points. The presentation of MFI is often vague, and studies defining objective clinical or intraoperative measurements are limited. In this review, we aim to properly define the condition, describe diagnostic criteria and risk factors contributing to MFI, review current implant design, and present outcomes of revision surgery performed for MFI. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(1):e13-e19.].

Similar outcomes of constrained condylar knee and rotating hinge prosthesis in revision surgery for extension instability after primary total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Instability is one of the most common reasons for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) failure. Constrained prosthesis can be used for significant ligamentous laxity, but there is not much evidence on the appropriate level of restriction for unstable varus-valgus TKA. The objective of this study was to compare the outcome and survival at a minimum follow-up of five years between rotating hinge knee prosthesis (RHK) and constrained condylar knee prosthesis (CCK) for extension instability following primary TKA.

HYPOTHESIS

For symptomatic extension instability after primary TKA, good functional outcomes and survival can be achieved with both designs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Consecutive patients with unstable primary TKA who underwent revision with either RHK (n=34) or CCK (n=30) were retrospectively compared. Assessments were performed by the Knee Society Scores (KSS), and visual analogue scales (VAS) for pain and patient satisfaction. Radiological evaluation was made. Complications and re-operations were analyzed.

RESULTS

Mean post-operative follow-up was 10.3 (range 5-16) years for both groups. At the final follow-up, there was no significant difference between groups in the KSS-knee (p=0.228) or KSS-function (p=0.324) score, VAS-pain (p=0.563), VAS-satisfaction (p=0.780), major complication rate (p=0.194), or TKA survival at 10 years (p=0.091).

CONCLUSION

The present study showed comparable good functional outcomes and survival at long-term between RHK and CCK arthroplasties. Both designs can be recommended for revision of total knee arthroplasty with symptomatic extension instability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Revision total knee arthroplasty for flexion instability : a concise follow-up of a previous report

AIMS

We have previously reported the mid-term outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for flexion instability. At a mean of four years, there were no re-revisions for instability. The aim of this study was to report the implant survivorship and clinical and radiological outcomes of the same cohort of of patients at a mean follow-up of ten years.

METHODS

The original publication included 60 revision TKAs in 60 patients which were undertaken between 2000 and 2010. The mean age of the patients at the time of revision TKA was 65 years, and 33 (55%) were female. Since that time, 21 patients died, leaving 39 patients (65%) available for analysis. The cumulative incidence of any re-revision with death as a competing risk was calculated. Knee Society Scores (KSSs) were also recorded, and updated radiographs were reviewed.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence of any re-revision was 13% at a mean of ten years. At the most recent-follow-up, eight TKAs had been re-revised: three for recurrent flexion instability (two fully revised to varus-valgus constrained implants (VVCs), and one posterior-stabilized (PS) implant converted to VVC, one for global instability (PS to VVC), two for aseptic loosening of the femoral component, and two for periprosthetic joint infection). The ten-year cumulative incidence of any re-revision for instability was 7%. The median KSS improved significantly from 45 (interquartile range (IQR) 40 to 50) preoperatively to 70 (IQR 45 to 80) at a mean follow-up of ten years (p = 0.031). Radiologically, two patients, who had not undergone revision, had evidence of loosening (one tibial and one patellar). The remaining components were well fixed.

CONCLUSION

We found fair functional outcomes and implant survivorship at a mean of ten years after revision TKA for flexion instability with a PS implant. Recurrent instability and aseptic loosening were the most common indications for re-revision. Components with increased constraint, such as a VVC or hinged, should be used in these patients in order to reduce the risk of recurrent instability.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(10):1126-1131.

Inter-Rater Reliability of Clinical Testing for Laxity After Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The clinical examination for laxity has been considered a mainstay in evaluation of the painful knee arthroplasty, especially for the diagnosis of instability. More than 10 mm of anterior-posterior (AP) translation in flexion has been described as important in the diagnosis of flexion instability. The inter-observer reliability of varus/valgus and AP laxity testing has not been tested.

METHODS

Ten subjects with prior to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were examined by 4 fellowship-trained orthopedic knee arthroplasty surgeons. Each surgeon evaluated each subject in random order and was blinded to the results of the other surgeons. Each surgeon performed an anterior drawer test at 30 and 90 degrees of flexion and graded the instability as 0-5 mm, 5-10 mm or >10 mm. Varus-valgus testing was also graded. Motion capture was used during the examination to determine the joint position and estimate joint reaction force during the examination.

RESULTS

Inter-rater reliability (IRR) was poor at 30 and 90 degrees for both the subjective rater score and the measured AP laxity in flexion (k = 018-0.22). Varus-valgus testing similarly had poor reliability. Force applied by the rater also had poor IRR.

CONCLUSION

Clinical testing of knee laxity after TKA has poor reliability between surgeons using motion analysis. It is unclear if this is from differences in examiner technique or from differences in pain or quadriceps function of the subjects. Instability after TKA should not be diagnosed strictly by clinical testing and should involve a complete clinical assessment of the patient.

Treatment of Flexion Instability After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Operative and Nonoperative Management of 218 Cases

BACKGROUND

For patients with flexion instability, there is a paucity of literature on the effectiveness of nonoperative management, and series on revision TKAs are limited. The purpose of this study is to evaluate effectiveness and prognostic factors of nonoperative management of flexion instability, and report survivorship, clinical outcomes, and radiographic results after revision TKA for flexion instability.

METHODS

We identified 218 patients with flexion instability after primary TKA through our total joint registry between 1990 and 2019. Mean age was 66 years, 59% were women, and 58% had a cruciate-retaining (CR) implant. Initially, 152 patients (70%) were treated nonoperatively. First-time revision TKA was ultimately performed in 173 patients. Kaplan-Meier survivorship was calculated. Knee Society Scores and radiographs were reviewed. Mean follow-up was 6 years.

RESULTS

Of the 152 patients treated nonoperatively, 66% reported no improvement. Patients with a CR design (hazard ratio [HR] 3.3, P < .001), inflammatory arthritis (HR 1.6, P = .03), smokers (HR 2.1, P = .04), and patient-reported instability (HR 3.8, P < .001) or effusions (HR 3.5, P < .001) were more likely to undergo revision. Of the 173 revised, the 10-year survivorship free of any re-revision was 87% with recurrent flexion instability (7), global instability (3), and infection (3) being most common. Knee Society Scores improved from 50 to 65 (P = .14). At final follow-up, all implants were well-fixed.

CONCLUSION

In this large series of flexion instability after primary TKA, nonoperative management led to improvement in one third. Patients with a CR design or with patient-reported instability and/or effusions were most likely to undergo revision. Revision TKA demonstrated modest 10-year functional improvements and good survivorship.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV (retrospective), Therapeutic.

Patient-reported outcome measures following revision knee replacement: a review of PROM instrument utilisation and measurement properties using the COSMIN checklist

OBJECTIVES

To identify: (1) patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used to evaluate symptoms, health status or quality of life following discretionary revision (or re-revision) knee joint replacement, and (2) validated joint-specific PROMs, their measurement properties and quality of evidence.

DESIGN

(1) Scoping review; (2) systematic review following the COnsensus-based Standards for selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase, AMED and PsycINFO were searched from inception to 1 July 2020 using the Oxford PROM filter unlimited by publication date or language.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Studies reporting on the development, validation or outcome of a joint-specific PROM for revision knee joint replacement were included.

RESULTS

51 studies reported PROM outcomes using eight joint-specific PROMs. 27 out of 51 studies (52.9%) were published within the last 5 years. PROM development was rated 'inadequate' for each of the eight PROMs studied. Validation studies were available for only three joint-specific PROMs: Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Lower Extremity Activity Scale (LEAS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC). 25 out of 27 (92.6%) measurement properties were rated insufficient, indeterminate or not assessed. The quality of supporting evidence was mostly low or very low. Each of the validated PROMs was rated 'B' (potential for recommendation but require further evaluation).

CONCLUSION

Joint-specific PROMs are increasingly used to report outcomes following revision knee joint replacement, but these instruments have insufficient evidence for their validity. Future research should be directed toward understanding the measurement properties of these instruments in order to inform clinical trials and observational studies evaluating the outcomes from joint-specific PROMs.

Satisfaction Rates Are Low following Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in Asians Despite Improvements in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

With the aging population in Asia and increase in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) utilization rates, the number of patients requiring revision TKA (rTKA) are expected to increase as well. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes and satisfaction rates following rTKA in an Asian population that has unique cultural demands. Registry data of patients who underwent rTKA from 2006 to 2010 and had completed 5 years of follow-up were analyzed. Flexion range, Oxford Knee score (OKS), Knee Society score (KSS), the Short-Form 36 (SF-36), and satisfaction rates were assessed for improvement from preoperative values, as well as by the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) criterion. rTKA was performed in 163 patients. There were significant improvements seen at 2 years postoperatively and these were sustained up to 5 years. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) criterion for KSS, OKS, and SF-36 physical component score (PCS) was met at 2 and 5 years postoperatively. The overall complication rate was 3.7% at a mean follow-up of 8.4 years. A total of 121 patients (74.2%) were satisfied at 5 years postoperatively. Within our cohort, rTKA results in significantly improved patient-reported outcome measures with a low complication rate of 3.7% at a minimum of 5-year follow-up. Despite these encouraging results, satisfaction rates remain low.

Improvements in Isokinetic Quadriceps and Hamstring Strength Testing After Focused Therapy in Patients With Flexion Instability

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of literature to guide non-operative treatment for patients with problems after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We sought to quantify how quadriceps and hamstring strength could improve with focused physical therapy (PT) and whether improving leg strength may prevent revision surgery for patients with flexion instability (FI) after TKA.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with FI by one of the 4 fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons at a single academic institution. Patients with FI were referred for strength measurements and a focused PT program. In total, 166 patients completed isokinetic testing to quantify their relative quadriceps and hamstring power, torque, and work measures compared to their contralateral leg. Fifty-five (33.5%) patients subsequently completed post-PT isokinetic testing. Statistical analysis was conducted to evaluate strength deficits in the knee with FI.

RESULTS

Patients with FI were found to be 20.5%-38.4% weaker in all strength domains compared to the contralateral leg (P < .001). Patients who completed PT and pre-isokinetic and post-isokinetic testing demonstrated statistically significant gains in all extension metrics by a net range of 24.7%-34.2% (P = .011-.029) and their flexion strength metrics improved by 32.5%-40.2% (P = .002-.005). About 81.9% of patients in this subgroup did not undergo revision TKA. Those subjects who went on to revision did not statistically improve in any strength domain (P = .063-.121).

CONCLUSION

Patients with FI after TKA have significantly weaker quadriceps and hamstrings in the operative compared to contralateral leg. Patients who did not undergo revision knee arthroplasty and completed a formal PT program improved quadriceps and hamstring strength by 30%.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV (Case series).

Long-Term Outcome Following Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty is Associated With Indication for Revision

BACKGROUND

There is limited information about long-term clinical outcomes following revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in relation to the indication for revision. Previously, a clear relation between indication for revision and clinical outcome was shown after 2 years. Present study evaluated (1) whether the reported association at 2 year remains present at 7.5 years, and (2) how clinical outcome at 7.5 years developed compared to baseline and 2-year follow-up, and (3) whether patients had additional adverse events.

METHODS

A cohort of 129 patients with a total system revision TKA was selected. Range of motion, Visual Analog Scale for pain and satisfaction, and clinical and functional Knee Society Score were obtained preoperatively, at 3 months, 1, 2, and 7.5 years. Reasons for revision were septic loosening, aseptic loosening, malposition, instability, and severe stiffness.

RESULTS

Patients revised for severe stiffness had significantly worse outcomes. No difference was found between the other indications. The clinical outcome after revision TKA at 7.5 years remained stable for septic and aseptic loosening, malposition, and instability but deteriorated slightly for the severe stiffness group. Visual Analog Scale satisfaction remained constant for all indications. There were 11 additional complications between 2- and 7.5-year follow-up, 9 of which necessitated reoperation.

CONCLUSION

All indications except severe stiffness had a similar clinical outcome which was maintained up to 7.5-year follow-up. The severe stiffness group had worse outcomes and deteriorated slightly at longer follow-up. Outcome at 3 months seems predictive for long-term outcome. Additional complications did not differ significantly for the different reasons for revision.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, prognostic study.

Flexion Instability After Total Knee Arthroplasty

Flexion instability after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is caused by an increased flexion gap compared with extension gap. Patients present with recurrent effusions, subjective instability (especially going downstairs), quadriceps weakness, and diffuse periretinacular pain. Manual testing for laxity in flexion is commonly done to confirm a diagnosis, although testing positions and laxity grades are inconsistent. Nonsurgical treatment includes quadriceps strengthening and bracing treatment. The mainstays to surgical management of femoral instability involve increasing the posterior condylar offset, decreasing the tibial slope, raising the joint line in combination with a thicker polyethylene insert, and ensuring appropriate rotation of implants. Patient outcomes after revision TKA for flexion instability show the least amount of improvement when compared with revisions for other TKA failure etiologies. Future work is needed to unify reproducible diagnostic criteria. Advancements in biomechanical analysis with motion detection, isokinetic quadriceps strength testing, and computational modeling are needed to advance the collective understanding of this underappreciated failure mechanism.