Modifiable Risk Factors Are Common in Early Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

Perception of Perioperative Risk for Arthroplasty Patients: A Poll of Chinese Orthopaedic Surgeons

BACKGROUND

Informed by the precedent of an American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS) survey, where 95% of participants reported instigating modifications to preoperative risk factors, this study appraised the approach of Chinese arthroplasty surgeons toward patients who had modifiable risks.

METHODS

An adaptation of the AAHKS survey tool for a Chinese cohort was undertaken. The survey queried 600 Chinese Society of Hip and Knee Surgeons members on whether the perception of unoptimized medical comorbidities and socioeconomic elements affects the propensity to offer surgical procedures.

RESULTS

Out of the distributed surveys, 150 responses were received, culminating in a response rate of 25%. The data illustrate that 98.7% of Chinese surgeons practice restrictions on arthroplasty access for patients who have modifiable risk factors, with notable frequencies for malnutrition (93.3%), anemia (91.3%), recent hyaluronic acid injections (within one month, 88.7%), and corticosteroid injections (within 3 months, 74.7%). Assessment criteria ahead of surgery included limitations such as a body mass index under 40 (47.3%), requirements for smoking cessation (57.3%), an acceptable hemoglobin A1c level (95.3%), and a dependent fasting blood glucose level (88%). Moreover, 87.3% of respondents endorsed the need for additional interventions for certain socioeconomically disadvantaged patients to achieve successful outcomes. A majority of respondents (94.7%) believed that more equitable access to care, facilitated by better-adjusted payment methodologies, could enhance patient outcomes. Current payment schemes were also perceived by a majority to potentially compromise outcomes for patients who have inadequate social support (80.7%), low socioeconomic status (67.3%), and those lacking insurance (72.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

The consistency of the almost 99% response rate in addressing modifiable risk factors prior to arthroplasty aligns closely with the reported practices in the AAHKS survey. These findings underscore the shared valuation of preoperative risk factor optimization by Chinese and American arthroplasty surgeons, notwithstanding divergent healthcare system structures.

Body Mass Index Did Not Affect the Risk of Revision 3-9 Years After Total Knee Replacement Surgery

Background

There are conflicting reports in the literature regarding the risk of revision after primary total knee replacement (TKR) in obese patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate if body mass index (BMI) influences the risk of revision 3-9 years after primary TKR.

Methods

All patients undergoing a primary TKR in our institution from 2014 to 2018 were included in a retrospective study. The effect of BMI on all-cause revision was estimated in a logistic regression analysis. A directed acyclic graph was created to identify variables affecting the primary endpoint (revision). According to the directed acyclic graph, adjustment was only needed for age and smoking. However, we also included variables thought to influence the revision risk based on clinical experience and previous research. The final logistic regression analysis was therefore adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, diabetes mellitus and the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification.

Results

One thousand fifty-nine primary TKR patients with a mean age of 68.1 (standard deviation 9.4) years were included. There were 609 (57.5%) women, and the median follow-up time was 5.6 (range 3.0-9.0) years. There were 41 (3.9%) revisions. BMI did not affect the risk of revision when adjusted for relevant covariates in a multivariate logistic regression analysis (odds ratio 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.93-1.05, P = .6).

Conclusions

BMI did not influence the risk of revision rate 3-9 years after TKR.

Prevalence of Depressive Symptoms in Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Based on the Mode of Failure

Background

Complications following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) that necessitate revision cause considerable psychological distress and symptoms of depression, which are linked to poorer postoperative outcomes, increased complications, and increased healthcare utilization. We aimed to identify the prevalence of mental health disorders and symptoms preoperatively and postoperatively in patients undergoing aseptic revision TKA and to stratify these patients based on their mechanism of failure.

Methods

All patients undergoing aseptic revision TKA from 2008 to 2019 with a minimum 1-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed at a single institution. Patients (n = 394) were grouped based on 7 failure modes previously described. Patients were considered to have depressive symptoms if their Veterans RAND-12 mental component score was below 42. Preoperative and postoperative Veterans RAND-12 mental component scores at the latest follow-up were evaluated.

Results

Overall comparative prevalence of preoperative to postoperative depressive symptoms was 23.4%-18.8%. By mode of failure are as follows: arthrofibrosis (25.8%-16.7%), aseptic loosening (25.3%-18.9%), extensor mechanism disruption (25%-50%), failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (8.6%-14.3%), instability (25.7%-17.1%), osteolysis or polyethylene wear (23.1%-23.1%), and patellar failure (11.8%-23.5%). There was no difference in depressive symptoms among failure modes preoperatively (P = .376) or at the latest postoperative follow-up (P = .175).

Conclusions

The prevalence of depressive symptoms in revision TKA patients appears to be independent of failure mode. Surgeon awareness and screening for depressive symptoms in this patient population preoperatively with referral for potential treatment may improve early postoperative outcomes.

Outcomes of Total Knee Arthroplasty Revisions in Obese and Morbidly Obese Patient Populations

BACKGROUND

The obese population is at higher risk for complications following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but little data is available regarding revision outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the role of body mass index (BMI) in the cause for revision TKA and whether BMI classification is predictive of outcomes.

METHODS

A multi-institutional database was generated, including revision TKAs from 2012 to 2019. Data collection included demographics, comorbidities, surgery types (primary revision, repeat revision), reasons for revision, lengths of hospital stay, and surgical times. Patients were compared using 3 BMI categories: nonobese (18.5 to 29.9), obese (30 to 39.9), and morbidly obese (≥40). Categorical and continuous variables were analyzed using chi-square and 1-way analysis of variance tests, respectively. Regression analyses were used to compare reasons for revision among weight classes.

RESULTS

Obese and morbidly obese patients showed significant risk for repeat revision surgery in comparison to normal weight patients. Obese patients were at higher risk for primary revision due to stiffness/fibrosis and repeat revision due to malposition. In comparison to the obese population, morbidly obese patients were more likely to require primary revision for dislocation and implant loosening.

CONCLUSION

Significant differences in primary and repeat revision etiologies exist among weight classes. Furthermore, obese and morbidly obese patients have a greater risk of requiring repeat revision surgery. These patients should be informed of their risk for multiple operations, and surgeons should be aware of the differences in revision etiologies when anticipating complications following primary TKA.

Impact of tobacco usage on readmission and complication rates following shoulder replacement surgery: A study of 164,527 patients

Background

Tobacco carcinogens have adverse effects on bone health and are associated with inferior outcomes following orthopedic procedures. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact tobacco use has on readmission and complication rates following shoulder arthroplasty.

Methods

The 2016-2018 National Readmissions Database was queried to identify patients who underwent anatomical, reverse, and hemi-shoulder arthroplasty. ICD-10 codes Z72.0 ×  (tobacco use disorder) and F17.2 ×  (nicotine dependence) were used to define "tobacco-users." Demographic, 30-/90-day readmission, surgical complication, and medical complication data were collected. Inferential statistics were used to analyze complications for both the cohort as a whole and for each procedure separately (i.e. anatomical, reverse, and hemiarthroplasty).

Results

164,527 patients were identified (92% nontobacco users). Tobacco users necessitated replacement seven years sooner than nonusers (p < 0.01) and were more likely to be male (52% vs. 43%; p < 0.01). Univariate analysis showed that tobacco users had higher rates of readmission, revisions, shoulder complications, and medical complications overall. In the multivariate analysis for the entire cohort, readmission, revision, and complication rates did not differ based on tobacco usage; however, smokers who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty in particular were found to have higher 90-day readmission, dislocation, and prosthetic complication rates compared to nonsmokers.

Conclusion

Comparatively, tobacco users required surgical correction earlier in life and had higher rates of readmission, revision, and complications in the short term following their shoulder replacement. However, when controlling for tobacco usage as an independent predictor of adverse outcomes, these aforementioned findings were lost for the cohort as a whole. Overall, these findings indicate that shoulder replacement in general is a viable treatment option regardless of patient tobacco usage at short-term follow-up, but this conclusion may vary depending on the replacement type used.

Preoperative Patient Optimization: Outcomes from Elective Total Joint Arthroplasty in a Large US Healthcare System

INTRODUCTION

Patient factors are known to affect outcomes in arthroplasty surgery. A preoperative program to address modifiable factors may aid in more appropriate patient selection. We sought to assess patient selection and 90-day postoperative outcomes for total joint arthroplasty (TJA) candidates before and after implementation of a preoperative optimization protocol.

METHODS

A retrospective time-trend study using data from an integrated healthcare system's total joint replacement registry was done. The study sample consisted of patients aged 18 years or older who underwent primary elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for osteoarthritis between 2009 and 2019. Patients were divided into two cohorts: procedures performed from 2009 to 2013 ("preoptimization protocol") and those from 2015 to 2019 ("postoptimization protocol"); 2014 was excluded because an evidence-based preoperative patient optimization protocol was progressively implemented throughout the year. Patient characteristics, optimization factors, and 90-day outcomes (including emergency department [ED] visits, readmission, all-cause revision, deep infection, venous thromboembolism, and mortality) were compared between the two cohorts using the Pearson chi-square test or Wilcoxon test.

RESULTS

The study sample included 25,925 THA and 60,484 TKA. In the THA cohort, 10,364 (40.0%) and 15,561 (60.0%) were from the preoptimization and postoptimization cohorts, respectively. The postoptimization THA cohort saw lower rates of ED visits (12.1% vs. 9.4%, P < 0.001) and readmissions (5.6% vs. 3.8%, P < 0.001). In the TKA cohort, 24,054 (39.8%) and 36,430 (60.2%) were from the preoptimization and postoptimization cohorts, respectively. The postoptimization TKA cohort saw lower rates of ED visits (13.1% vs. 11.9%, P < 0.001), readmissions (5.6% vs. 3.0%, P < 0.001), all-cause revisions (0.5% vs. 0.3%, P = 0.003), venous thromboembolism (1.3% vs. 0.9%, P < 0.001), and mortality (0.3% vs. 0.2%, P = 0.011).

DISCUSSION

An evidence-based protocol to improve patient selection based on modifiable patient factors was adopted by orthopaedic surgeons in the system and utilization of the protocol before TJA was associated with fewer postoperative complications over time.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Perception of Perioperative Risk for Arthroplasty Patients: A Poll of Australian Orthopedic Surgeons

BACKGROUND

There is growing interest in the perioperative management of patients who have indications for hip and knee arthroplasty in the setting of modifiable risk factors such as morbid obesity, poorly controlled diabetes, and smoking. A recent survey of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS) found that 95% of respondents address modifiable risk factors prior to surgery. The aim of this study was to poll Australian arthroplasty surgeons regarding their approach to patients who have modifiable risk factors.

METHODS

The survey tool used in the AAHKS study was adapted for use in the Australian context and distributed to the membership of the Arthroplasty Society of Australia via SurveyMonkey. There were 77 responses received, representing a response rate of 64%.

RESULTS

The majority of respondents were experienced, high volume arthroplasty surgeons. Overall, 91% of respondents restricted access to arthroplasty for patients who have modifiable risk factors. There were 72% restricting access for excessive body mass index, 85% for poor diabetic control, and 46% for smoking. Most respondents made decisions based on personal experience or literature review rather than hospital or departmental pressures. While 49% of surgeons believed that current payment systems did not impair their ability to achieve good outcomes, 58% believed that certain arthroplasty patients would benefit from additional intervention, based on their socioeconomic status.

CONCLUSION

Over 90% of surgeons who responded address modifiable risk factors prior to surgery. This finding aligns with the practice patterns of AAHKS members, despite differences in healthcare systems.

Tobacco Use Is Associated with More Severe Adverse Outcomes Than Morbid Obesity after Aseptic Revision TKA

The association of morbid obesity with increased revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) complications is potentially confounded by concurrent risk factors. This study was performed to evaluate whether morbid obesity was more strongly associated with adverse aseptic rTKA outcomes than diabetes or tobacco use history-when present as a solitary major risk factor. Demographic characteristics, surgical indications, and adverse outcomes (reoperation, revision, infection, and amputation) were compared between 270 index aseptic rTKA performed for patients with morbid obesity (n = 73), diabetes (n = 72), or tobacco use (n = 125) and 239 "healthy" controls without these risk factors at a mean 75.7 (range: 24-111) months. There was no difference in 2-year reoperation rate (17.8 vs. 17.6%, p = 1.0) or component revision rate (8.2 vs. 8.4%) between morbidly obese and healthy patients. However, higher reoperation rates were noted in patients with diabetes (p = 0.02) and tobacco use history (p < 0.01), including higher infection (p < 0.05) and above knee amputation (p < 0.01) rates in patients with tobacco use history. Multivariate analysis retained an independent association between smoking history and amputation risk (odds ratio: 7.4, 95% confidence interval: 1.7-55.2, p < 0.01). Morbid obesity was not associated with an increased risk of reoperation or component revision compared with healthy patients undergoing aseptic revision. Tobacco use was associated with increased reoperation and above knee amputation. Additional study will be beneficial to determine whether risk reduction efforts are effective in mitigating postoperative complication risks.

Optimización preoperatoria del paciente antes de una artroplastia de cadera o rodilla: parte 1

Las artroplastias de cadera y rodilla son estrategias que han demostrado ser efectivas en el tratamiento de la patología degenerativa articular. El reemplazo articular mejora la calidad de vida de la mayoría de los pacientes cuando el tratamiento conservador falla. Sin embargo, estas son cirugías mayores que conllevan un riesgo significativo de complicaciones, incluyendo la necesidad de una revisión. El propósito de este artículo es analizar los factores de riesgo modificables del paciente antes de la cirugía, a finde disminuir el riesgo de complicaciones posoperatorias. Estudios recientes han descripto ciertos factores de riesgo modificables, inherentes al paciente y que incrementan la posibilidad de complicaciones posoperatorias luego de un reemplazo articular de cadera o rodilla. Estos incluyen obesidad, malnutrición, tabaquismo, diabetes, anemia, deficiencia de vitamina D, consumo de opioides, artropatías inflamatorias, insuficiencia renal crónica y colonización por estafilococco meticilino-resistente. Si conseguimos optimizar estas condiciones durante el preoperatorio, reduciremos el riesgo de complicaciones posoperatorias.

Consensus Guidelines on Interventional Therapies for Knee Pain (STEP Guidelines) from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience

Knee pain is second only to the back as the most commonly reported area of pain in the human body. With an overall prevalence of 46.2%, its impact on disability, lost productivity, and cost on healthcare cannot be overlooked. Due to the pervasiveness of knee pain in the general population, there are no shortages of treatment options available for addressing the symptoms. Ranging from physical therapy and pharmacologic agents to interventional pain procedures to surgical options, practitioners have a wide array of options to choose from – unfortunately, there is no consensus on which treatments are “better” and when they should be offered in comparison to others. While it is generally accepted that less invasive treatments should be offered before more invasive ones, there is a lack of agreement on the order in which the less invasive are to be presented. In an effort to standardize the treatment of this extremely prevalent pathology, the authors present an all-encompassing set of guidelines on the treatment of knee pain based on an extensive literature search and data grading for each of the available alternative that will allow practitioners the ability to compare and contrast each option.

Preoperative Risk Factors for Primary Metatarsophalangeal Arthroplasty Revision to MTP Arthrodesis for Hallux Rigidus

BACKGROUND

Revision or conversion to arthrodesis following metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint arthroplasty are salvage procedures to manage complications of MTP joint arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to use a national administrative database to characterize nationwide trends of patients undergoing hallux MTP arthrodesis vs arthroplasty for hallux rigidus. Additionally, the authors sought to evaluate demographic trends and evaluate influence of patient-related risk factors in those undergoing MTP arthroplasty revision to arthrodesis.

METHODS

Patients who underwent MTP arthroplasty for diagnosis of hallux rigidus from 2010 to 2019 were identified in the Mariner subset of the PearlDiver database. Patients were included if they had undergone MTP arthroplasty for the diagnosis of hallux rigidus. Notably, the database lacks resolution about critical features of the arthroplasty design and materials. The revision cohort encompassed patients who underwent subsequent ipsilateral MTP arthrodesis or arthroplasty within 2 years of index arthroplasty procedure. Demographic characteristics and medical comorbidities were examined as potential patient-related risk factors for arthroplasty revision or revision to fusion. Univariate analyses were performed to analyze differences in patient demographics, comorbidities, and risk factors. A multivariate regression analysis was subsequently conducted to control for confounding variables.

RESULTS

2750 patients underwent primary MTP arthroplasty for diagnosis of hallux rigidus. Of these, 44 (1.6%) underwent revision arthroplasty and 188 patients (6.8%) were revised to arthrodesis within the first 2 years after the index procedure. Multivariate regression analysis indicates that obesity (odds ratio [OR] 1.48, 95% CI 1.05-2.09), depression (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.15-2.20), and steroid use (OR 2.94, 95% CI 1.30-6.65) were associated with a statistically significant increase in revision to arthrodesis from primary arthroplasty.

CONCLUSION

Revision arthrodesis following primary MTP arthroplasty for hallux rigidus within 2 years was found to be a relatively common occurrence in this national insurance database study. Risk factors for revision arthroplasty to arthrodesis within 2 years of primary arthroplasty include obesity, depression, and steroid use.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, case-control study.

Extensive Preoperative Work Is Required for Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Determining the clinical effort associated with preparing for revision total hip and knee arthroplasty is necessary to maintain the appropriate work relative value unit rating. We have investigated the work done by the orthopedic surgical team in the days and weeks prior to revision hip and knee arthroplasty using a count of time by team members in the electronic medical record (EMR).

METHODS

EMR audit logs were generated, and preoperative work (POW) was calculated for members of the surgical team for 200 sequential revision cases. Independent samples t-tests were conducted to compare total POW for procedure, age, gender, insurance, and health literacy; significance threshold was set at P = .05.

RESULTS

POW was 97.7 minutes (standard deviation [SD] 53.1). Surgeon POW accounted for 10.5 minutes (SD 9.3), nurses for 29.9 minutes (SD 34.2), mid-level providers for 22.1 minutes (SD 17.0), and office technicians for 34.1 minutes (SD 35.2). There was no difference in total POW based on procedure (hip vs knee), age, gender, insurance type, or health literacy.

CONCLUSION

Revision arthroplasty requires substantial preoperative preparation from the surgical team. Most of this is by nurses, mid-level providers, and office staff. This does not seem to be different for hip or knee revisions or by age and gender. EMR audit logs capture the bare minimum POW required to prepare a patient for revision arthroplasty.

Are there avoidable causes of early revision total knee arthroplasty?

Introduction

Surgeons can improve their practice by understanding potentially avoidable reasons for early revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). The purpose of this study is to describe potentially avoidable indications for rTKA within 5 years of the index procedure.

Methods

This retrospective observational analysis utilized the rTKA database at a large, academic orthopedic specialty hospital to identify 167 consecutive rTKA from 2014 to 2019 performed within 5 years after primary TKA (pTKA). Two fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons reviewed the cases to classify them as potentially avoidable or unavoidable. Unavoidable indications for rTKA included infection/wound complication, arthrofibrosis, instability due to underlying collagen disease or significant weight loss, and any traumatic event leading to pTKA failure. Potentially avoidable indications included atraumatic instability, intraoperative fracture, metal allergy, and atraumatic patellar instability or maltracking. Aseptic loosening was considered avoidable if it occurred in the presence of component malpositioning or poor cementation technique.

Results

There were 112 (67.1%) unavoidable cases and 55 avoidable cases (32.9%). Of the unavoidable cases, there were 68 rTKA for infection or wound complications (60.7%), 23 for arthrofibrosis (20.5%), 6 for instability (5.4%), 6 for postoperative fracture (5.4%), 6 for aseptic loosening (5.4%), and 3 for extensor mechanism pathology following trauma (2.6%). Of the potentially avoidable rTKA, 24 were for aseptic loosening (43.7%), 23 for atraumatic instability (41.8%), 6 for atraumatic extensor mechanism pathology (10.9%), 1 for nickel allergy (1.8%), and 1 for intraoperative fracture (1.8%).

Conclusion

These findings indicate that over 30% of early rTKA are potentially avoidable. Interventions should focus on addressing potentially avoidable causes such as short-term aseptic loosening and instability to reduce the need for costly and resource-intensive rTKA.

Level of evidence III, retrospective observational analysis

Are Morbidly Obese Patients Equally Benefitting From Care Improvements in Total Hip Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

Morbidly obese patients have increased rates of complications following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and it is not clear whether improvements in THA care pathways are equally benefitting these patients. The purpose of this study is to assess if reductions in complications have similarly improved for both morbidly obese and non-morbidly obese patients after THA.

METHODS

Patients undergoing primary THA between 2011 and 2019 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients were stratified by body mass index (BMI) <40 and ≥40 kg/m². Thirty-day rates of infectious complications, readmissions, reoperation, and any complication were assessed. Trends in complications were compared utilizing odds ratios and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

In total, 234,334 patients underwent THA and 16,979 (7.8%) had BMI ≥40 kg/m². Patients with BMI ≥40 kg/m² were at significantly higher odds for readmission, reoperation, and infectious complications. Odds for any complication were lower for morbidly obese patients in 2011, not different from 2012 to 2014, and higher from 2015 to 2019 compared to lower BMI patients. Odds for any non-transfusion complication were higher for morbidly obese patients and there was no improvement for either group over the study period. There were improvements in rates of readmission and reoperation for patients with BMI <40 kg/m² and readmission for BMI >40 kg/m².

CONCLUSION

Odds for readmission and reoperation for non-morbidly obese patients and readmission for morbidly obese patients improved from 2011 to 2019. Reductions in transfusions are largely responsible for improvements in overall complication rates. Although morbidly obese patients remain at higher risk for complications, there does not appear to be a growing disparity in outcomes between morbidly obese and non-morbidly obese patients.

The lifetime risk of revision following total knee arthroplasty : a New Zealand Joint Registry study

AIMS

The success of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is usually measured using functional outcome scores and revision-free survivorship. However, reporting the lifetime risk of revision may be more meaningful to patients when gauging risks, especially in younger patients. We aimed to assess the lifetime risk of revision for patients in different age categories at the time of undergoing primary TKA.

METHODS

The New Zealand Joint Registry database was used to obtain revision rates, mortality, and the indications for revision for all primary TKAs performed during an 18-year period between January 1999 and December 2016. Patients were stratified into age groups at the time of the initial TKA, and the lifetime risk of revision was calculated according to age, sex, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade. The most common indications for revision were also analyzed for each age group.

RESULTS

The overall ten-year survival rate was 95.6%. This was lowest in the youngest age group (between 46 and 50 years) and increased sequentially with increasing age. The lifetime risk of requiring revision was 22.4% in those aged between 46 and 50 years at the time of the initial surgery, and decreased linearly with increasing age to 1.15% in those aged between 90 and 95 years at the time of surgery. Higher ASA grades were associated with increased lifetime risk of revision in all age groups. The three commonest indications for revision were aseptic loosening, infection, and unexplained pain. Young males, aged between 46 and 50 years, had the highest lifetime risk of revision (25.2%).

CONCLUSION

Lifetime risk of revision may be a more meaningful measure of outcome than implant survival at defined time periods when counselling patients prior to TKA. This study highlights the considerably higher lifetime risk of revision surgery for all indications, including infection, in younger male patients. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(2):235-241.

Modifiable risk factors increase length of stay and 90-day cost of care after shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Baseline health conditions can negatively impact cost of care and risk of complications after joint replacement, necessitating additional care and incurring higher costs. Bundled payments have been used for hip and knee replacement and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is testing bundled payments for upper extremity arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of predefined modifiable risk factors (MRFs) on total encounter charges, hospital length of stay (LOS), related emergency department (ED) visits and charges, and related hospital readmissions within 90 days after shoulder arthroplasty.

METHODS

We queried the electronic medical record (EPIC) for all shoulder arthroplasty cases under DRG 483 within a regional 7-hospital system between October 2015 and December 2019. Data was used to calculate mean LOS, total 90-day charges, related emergency department (ED) visits and charges, and related hospital readmissions after shoulder arthroplasty. Data for patients who had 1 or more MRFs, defined as anemia (hemoglobin < 10 g/dL), malnutrition (albumin < 3.4 g/dL), obesity (BMI > 40), uncontrolled diabetes (random glucose > 180 mg/dL or glycated hemoglobin > 8.0%), tobacco use (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, code indicating patient is a smoker), and opioid use (opioid prescription within 90 days of surgery), were evaluated as potential covariates to assess the relationship between MRFs and total encounter charges, LOS, ED visits, ED charges, and hospital readmissions.

RESULTS

A total of 1317 shoulder arthroplasty patients were identified. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that anemia (+$19,847, confidence interval [CI] $15,743, $23,951; P < .001), malnutrition (+$5850, CI $3712, $7988; P < .001), and obesity (+$2762, CI $766, $4758, P = .007) independently contributed to higher charges after shoulder arthroplasty. Mean LOS was higher in patients with anemia (5.0 ± 4.0 days vs. 2.2 ± 1.6 days, P < .001), malnutrition (3.7 ± 2.8 days vs. 2.2 ± 1.5 days, P < .001), and uncontrolled diabetes (2.8 ± 2.8 days vs. 2.3 ± 1.7 days, P = .019). Univariate risk factors associated with a significant increase in total 90-day encounter charges included anemia (+$19,345, n = 37, P < .001), malnutrition (+$6971, n = 116, P < .001), obesity (+$2615, n = 184, P = .011), and uncontrolled diabetes (+$4377, n = 66, P = .011). Univariate risk for readmission within 90 days was higher in patients with malnutrition (odds ratio 3.0, CI 1.8, 4.9; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Malnutrition, obesity, and anemia contribute to significantly higher costs after shoulder arthroplasty. Medical strategies to optimize patients before shoulder arthroplasty are warranted to reduce total 90-day encounter charges, length of stay, and risk of readmission within 90 days of surgery. Optimizing patient health before shoulder surgery will positively impact outcomes and cost containment for patients, institutions, and payors after shoulder arthroplasty.

Increased severity of anemia is associated with postoperative complications following primary total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Anemia has been demonstrated as a modifiable risk factor for postoperative complications following various types of primary and revision total joint arthroplasties. However, at present, we are not aware of any studies assessing postoperative complications following total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) in patients with varying severity of anemia. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of preoperative anemia severity on 30-day postoperative complications following primary TSA.

METHODS

Adult patients undergoing primary TSA from 2012 to 2018 were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients undergoing TSA were substratified into 3 cohorts: nonanemia (hematocrit >36% for women, >39% for men), mild anemia (hematocrit 33%-36% for women, 33%-39% for men), and moderate to severe anemia (hematocrit <33% for both women and men), based on World Health Organization definitions of anemia. In this analysis, 30-day wound, cardiac, pulmonary, renal, and thromboembolic complications, as well as sepsis, mortality, postoperative transfusion, extended length of stay, and reoperation were assessed. Bivariate analyses, including χ² and analysis of variance, and multivariable logistical regression were performed.

RESULTS

Of 13,921 total patients undergoing TSA, 11,330 patients (81.4%) did not have anemia, 1934 (13.9%) had mild anemia, and 657 (4.7%) had moderate to severe anemia. Following adjustment, patients with mild anemia were more likely to have a postoperative blood transfusion (odds ratio [OR] 4.7, P < .001), extended length of stay (OR 1.7, P = .002), and reoperation (OR 1.5, P = .028). Patients with moderate to severe anemia were at increased risk of cardiac complications (OR 3.0, P = .012), pulmonary complications (OR 2.2, P = .015), postoperative blood transfusion (OR 23.8, P < .001), extended length of stay (OR 6.6, P < .001), reoperation (OR 2.2, P = .003), and death (OR 3.8, P = .034).

CONCLUSION

From mild anemia to moderate to severe anemia, there was a stepwise and approximately 2-fold increase in the odds of postoperative complications for patients undergoing primary TSA. Patients with moderate to severe anemia should be medically optimized before they undergo TSA.

Temporal Trends of Revision Etiologies in Total Knee Arthroplasty at a Single High-Volume Institution: An Epidemiological Analysis

Background

Temporal changes in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) may have implications in determining the etiology for implant failure. The purpose of this study was to 1) perform an epidemiologic analysis of etiologies that required rTKA and 2) determine whether temporal changes existed for revision over the study period.

Methods

All rTKA procedures performed at a single institution from 2009 to 2019 were analyzed. Revision procedures were stratified into 2 time periods, 2009-2013 and 2014-2019, to assess for changes over time. Patients' electronic medical record, operative report, and radiographs were reviewed to ensure diagnosis information was accurately documented in relation to the predominate etiology necessitating the revision procedure.

Results

Three thousand and nine patients undergoing rTKA between 2009 and 2019 were identified with a mean age of 64.6 years. A total of 1,666 (55.4%) patients were female, and the majority of patients were Caucasian (2,306, 76.6%). The 3 most frequent rTKA etiologies were aseptic loosening (35.1%), periprosthetic infection (33.2%), and instability (16.0%). A higher proportion of patients underwent rTKA for arthrofibrosis (5.1% vs 3.4%, P = .023) and periprosthetic joint infection (38.9% vs 28.6%, P < .001) between 2009 and 2013, while a significantly higher proportion of patients underwent rTKA for instability (12.6% vs 18.8%, P < .001) between 2014 and 2019.

Conclusion

Aseptic loosening was the most common cause for rTKA over the last decade. rTKA for arthrofibrosis and periprosthetic joint infection was more frequent between 2009 and 2013, while a significantly higher proportion of patients underwent rTKA for instability in 2014-2019. Future studies will need to focus on identifying and reducing risk factors for the trending causes of rTKA.

Hospital Frailty Risk Score predicts adverse events in revision total hip and knee arthroplasty

Introduction

The Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) is a validated risk stratification model referring to the cumulative deficits model of frailty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the HFRS as a predictor of 90-day readmission and complications after revision total hip (rTHA) and knee (rTKA) arthroplasty.

Methods

In a retrospective analysis of 565 patients who had undergone rTHA or rTKA between 2011 and 2019, the HFRS was calculated for each patient. Rates of adverse events were compared between patients with low and intermediate or high frailty risk. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the relationship between the HFRS and post-operative adverse events.

Results

Patients with intermediate or high frailty risk showed higher rates of readmission (30days: 23.8% vs. 9.9%, p = 0.006; 90days: 26.2% vs. 13.0%, p < 0.018), surgical complications (28.6% vs. 7.8%, p < 0.001), medical complications (11.9% vs. 1.0%, p < 0.001), other complications (28.6% vs. 2.3%, p < 0.001), Clavien-Dindo grade IV complications (14.3% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.009), and transfusion (33.3% vs. 6.1%, p < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed a high HFRS as independent risk factor for surgical complications (OR = 3.45, 95% CI 1.45-8.18, p = 0.005), medical complications (OR = 7.29, 95% CI 1.72-30.97, p = 0.007), and other complications (OR = 14.15, 95% CI 5.16-38.77, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The HFRS predicts adverse events after rTHA and rTKA. As it derives from routinely collected data, the HFRS could be implemented automated in hospital information systems to facilitate identification of at-risk patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00264-021-05038-w.

Preoperative optimization to prevent periprosthetic joint infection in at-risk patients

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains an important complication with devastating consequences after total joint arthroplasties. With the increasing number of arthroplasties worldwide, the number of PJI will increase correspondingly with a significant economic burden to our healthcare system. It is likely impossible to completely eradicate PJI; hence, assessment and optimization of its risk factors to preventing such a disastrous complication will be the key. There are many strategies to prevent PJI in the preoperative, intraoperative, or postoperative phases. The preoperative assessment provides a unique opportunity to screen and diagnose underlying comorbidities and optimize modifiable risk factors before elective surgeries. In this review, we will focus on current literature in preoperative assessment of various modifiable risk factors and share the experience and practical approach in our institution in preoperative optimization to reduce PJI in total joint arthroplasties.

Do Low Hemoglobin Levels Affect the Healing Process of Periprosthetic Joint Infection?

Background

Revision knee arthroplasty (RKA) is associated with low hemoglobin (Hb) levels after surgery, which results mostly from perioperative blood loss. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the common reasons for RKA. This study aimed to determine whether low Hb levels affect the healing process of PJI.

Methodology

This retrospective study included 69 patients who underwent two-stage revision for PJI between 2013 and 2016. Patients were divided into two groups according to the latest Hb levels (Hb < 10 and Hb > 10 g/dL) during hospitalization for the first-stage revision surgery. Laboratory parameters of infection were measured during the cement spacer retention period: C-reactive protein (CRP), sedimentation rate (SEDIM), and white blood cell (WBC) count. Treatment was evaluated in two periods: cement spacer retention period (between the first surgery and second surgery) and the first normal CRP period (between the first surgery with the first normal CRP level during the cement spacer retention period). Infection parameters in the two time periods and reoperation with cement spacer were compared between the groups.

Results

The mean patient age was 67.3 ± 7.94 (50-87) years, and the female-to-male ratio was 4:1. No difference was found in the postoperative first control CRP, SEDIM, and WBC between the groups (p = 0.953, p = 0.3341, and p = 0.444, respectively). CRP-SEDIM control curves were observed in parallel, and no significant difference was found. The cement spacer retention period was 60.3 ± 24.8 (17-123) days, and the first normal CRP period was 87.3 ± 28.4 (14-161) days; no statistical difference was found between the groups (p = 0.727, p = 0.754).

Conclusions

In RKA, as low Hb level was not a negative factor of infection, blood transfusion should be avoided as it has many complications.

An epidemiological analysis of revision aetiologies in total hip arthroplasty at a single high-volume centre

Aims

Advances in surgical technique and implant design may influence the incidence and mechanism of failure resulting in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). The purpose of the current study was to characterize aetiologies requiring rTHA, and to determine whether temporal changes existed in these aetiologies over a ten-year period.

Methods

All rTHAs performed at a single institution from 2009 to 2019 were identified. Demographic information and mode of implant failure was obtained for all patients. Data for rTHA were stratified into two time periods to assess for temporal changes: 2009 to 2013, and 2014 to 2019. Operative reports, radiological imaging, and current procedural terminology (CPT) codes were cross-checked to ensure the accurate classification of revision aetiology for each patient.

Results

In all, 2,924 patients with a mean age of 64.6 years (17 to 96) were identified. There were 1,563 (53.5%) female patients, and the majority of patients were Caucasian (n = 2,362, 80.8%). The three most frequent rTHA aetiologies were infection (27.2%), aseptic loosening (25.2%), and wear (15.2%). The frequency of rTHA for adverse local tissue reaction (ALTR) was significantly greater from 2014 to 2019 (4.7% vs 10.0%; p < 0.001), while the frequency of aseptic loosening was significantly greater from 2009 to 2013 (28.6% vs 21.9%; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Periprosthetic joint infection was the most common cause for rTHA in the current cohort of patients. Complications associated with ALTR necessitating rTHA was more frequent between 2014 to 2019, while aseptic loosening necessitating rTHA was significantly more frequent between 2009 to 2013. Optimizing protocols for prevention and management of infection and ALTR after THA may help to avoid additional financial burden to institutions and healthcare systems.Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;2(1):16-21.

Risk of Prosthetic Joint Infection Increases Following Early Aseptic Revision Surgery of Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

It is important to identify risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total joint arthroplasty in order to mitigate the substantial social and economic burden. The objective of this study is to evaluate early aseptic revision surgery as a potential risk factor for PJI following total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary THA or TKA with early aseptic revision were identified in 2 national insurance databases. Control groups of patients who did not undergo revision were identified and matched 10:1 to study patients. Rates of PJI at 1 and 2 years postoperatively following revision surgery were calculated and compared to controls using a logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 328 Medicare and 222 Humana patients undergoing aseptic revision THA within 1 year of index THA were found to have significantly increased risk of PJI at 1 year (5.49% vs 0.91%, odds ratio [OR] 5.61, P < .001 for Medicare; 7.21% vs 0.68%, OR 11.34, P < .001 for Humana) and 2 years (5.79% vs 1.10%, OR 4.79, P < .001 for Medicare; 8.11% vs 1.04%, OR 9.05, P < .001 for Humana). Similarly for TKA, 190 Medicare and 226 Humana patients who underwent aseptic revision TKA within 1 year were found to have significantly higher rates of PJI at 1 year (6.48% vs 1.16%, OR 7.69, P < .001 for Medicare; 6.19% vs 1.28%, OR 4.89, P < .001 for Humana) and 2 years (8.42% vs 1.58%, OR 6.57, P < .001 for Medicare; 7.08% vs 1.50%, OR 4.50, P < .001 for Humana).

CONCLUSION

Early aseptic revision surgery following THA and TKA is associated with significantly increased risks of subsequent PJI within 2 years.

Preoperative Risk Factor Screening Protocols in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Preoperative optimization protocols targeting potentially modifiable risk factors could prove beneficial in reducing the rate of complications in lower extremity total joint arthroplasty (LE-TJA). We aimed to summarize the evidence on preoperative screening protocols targeting modifiable risk factors to assess their effect on postoperative outcomes following primary LE-TJA.

METHODS

A literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library databases was performed in August 2019. The bibliographies of relevant publications were searched for further applicable studies. Included studies were required to report at least one outcome including prosthetic joint infection/surgical site infection (PJI/SSI), hospital length of stay (LOS), disposition, 90-day emergency department visits, or hospital readmissions after implementation of an evidence-based preoperative optimization protocol targeting modifiable risk factors. Methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 8 retrospective cohort studies including 9915 patients were reviewed. Implementation of preoperative optimization protocols were associated with reductions in SSI (0.56% vs. 2.60%; RR 0.21 [95% CI 0.12 to 0.37]; P < .00001), hospital LOS, mean cost of care, and hospital readmission rates. The mean MINORS score for comparative studies was 16.285.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation and compliance with evidence-based preoperative protocols for optimization of modifiable risk factors is associated with overall improved outcomes following LE-TJA. SSI, hospital LOS, average total cost of care, and hospital readmission rates were favorable in those cohorts subjected to a preoperative intervention protocol. Future prospective studies are necessary for further refinement of preoperative optimization protocols and referral algorithms, without compromising patients' access to surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, Systematic Review.

Concomitant Malnutrition and Frailty Are Uncommon, but Significant Risk Factors for Mortality and Complication Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) demand continues to rise, but we are also gaining greater insight into patient risk factors for postoperative complications and excess resource utilization. There has been growing interest in frailty and malnutrition as risk factors, although they are often mistakenly used interchangeably. We aimed at identifying the incidence of their coexistence, and the magnitude of risk they confer to TKA patients.

METHODS

We queried the American College of Surgeons-National Surgery Quality Improvement Program database to identify 4 patient cohorts: healthy/normal serum albumin, healthy/hypoalbuminemic patients, normoalbuminemic/medically frail patients (defined by modified frailty index), and hypoalbuminemic/frail patients. We performed both univariate and multivariate analyses to quantify the risk conferred by each condition in isolation, and in coexistence.

RESULTS

Of 179,702 elective TKA cases from 2006 to 2018, 18.6% of patients were frail only, 3.0% were hypoalbuminemic -only, and just 1.2% were both frail and hypoalbuminemic. The raw rate of any complication was highest in frail/hypoalbuminemic patients (8.7%), 5.2% in hypoalbuminemic patients, 4.8% in frail patients, and just 3.4% in healthy patients (P < .001); the multivariate model revealed odds ratio of a complication in frail/hypoalbuminemic group of 2.40 (95% confidence interval = 1.27-1.63; P < .001). Mortality within 30 days was highest in the frail/hypoalbuminemic cohort (1.0%), and just 0.1% in healthy patients, and the multivariate model noted an odds ratio of 9.43 for these patients (95% confidence interval = 5.92-14.93; P < .001). The odds of all studied complications were highest in the frail/hypoalbuminemic group.

CONCLUSION

Frailty and hypoalbuminemia represent distinct conditions and are independent risk factors for a complication after TKA. Their coexistence imparts a synergistic association with the risk of post-TKA complications.

Smoking, unemployment, female sex, obesity, and medication use yield worse outcomes in patellofemoral arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to identify effects of psychosocial and demographic factors on patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) outcomes.

METHODS

Patients who underwent PFA by a single surgeon between 2002 and 2013 (min. 2 year follow-up) were included. Knee Society scores (KSS), UCLA, and Tegner Scores were prospectively collected in a designated arthroplasty registry. Patient records were retrospectively reviewed and univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed to assess the effect of psychosocial factors and demographic variables including patient sex, BMI, smoking and medication use, psychiatric history, and employment status on improvement between pre- and post-operative scores.

RESULTS

Seventy-four knees in 55 patients (88% female) with a mean age of 51.8 (SD 8.8) and mean follow-up of 46.5 (SD 26.9) months were included. Patients showed significant improvement in all functional outcomes (p < 0.001). Mean improvement in KSS-F scores and median improvement in Tegner scores was greater in males compared to females (37.8 vs 16.1, p = 0.007; 3.0 vs 2.0, p = 0.07, respectively). Smokers showed less improvement in KSS-P compared to non-smokers (17.2 vs 30.0, p = 0.028). Retired or employed patients had a greater mean improvement in KSS-F and median improvement in Tegner Scores compared to those were unemployed or on work disability (p = 0.022, p = 0.01). Patients who reported using opioids and/or anti-depressants pre-operatively showed less improvement in UCLA scores (p = 0.006). Obese patients showed less improvement in both KSS-F and Tegner score compared to non-obese patients (p = 0.009, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Psychosocial factors influence the degree of improvement following PFA. Although patients showed overall improvement compared to their baseline scores, obese patients, smokers, unemployed/work disabled, and pre-operative use of opioids and/or anti-depressants were risk factors for decreased improvement… The consideration of psychosocial variables are clinically important when assessing a patient's candidacy for PFA and improve pre-operative patient selection and counselling.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

New developments and future challenges in prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of prosthetic joint infection

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication that results in substantial costs to society and patient morbidity. Advancements in our knowledge of this condition have focused on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment, in order to reduce rates of PJI and improve patient outcomes. Preventive measures such as optimization of patient comorbidities, and perioperative antibiotic usage are intensive areas of current clinical research to reduce the rate of PJI. Improved diagnostic tests such as synovial fluid (SF) α-defensin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and nucleic acid-based tests for serum, SF, and tissue cultures, have improved diagnostic accuracy and organism identification. Increasing the diversity of available antibiotic therapy, immunotherapy, and alternative implant coatings remain promising treatments to improve infection eradication in the setting of PJI.

Bariatric Surgery Prior to Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Cost-Effective in Morbidly Obese Patients

BACKGROUND

The cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery to achieve weight loss prior to total hip arthroplasty (THA), and decrease the complications and costs associated with THA in the morbidly obese, is unknown. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery prior to THA for morbidly obese patients with end-stage hip osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

A state-transition Markov model was constructed to compare the cost-utility of 2 treatment protocols for patients with morbid obesity and end-stage hip OA: (1) immediate THA and (2) bariatric surgery 2 years prior to THA (combined protocol). The analysis was performed from both a payer and a societal perspective using direct and indirect costs over a 40-year time horizon. Utilities, associated costs, and probabilities for health state transitions were derived from the literature. One-way, 2-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to validate the robustness of the base case results, using the standard willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/quality-adjusted life years.

RESULTS

From the societal perspective, the combined protocol was more effective (13.16 vs 12.26) with less cost ($91,717 vs $92,684) and thus was the dominant strategy over immediate THA. These results were stable across broad ranges for independent model variables. Monte Carlo simulation with 100,000 samples demonstrated that bariatric surgery prior to THA was the preferred cost-effective strategy over 95% of the time from both a societal and payer perspective.

CONCLUSION

In the morbidly obese patient with end-stage hip OA, bariatric surgery prior to THA is a cost-effective strategy for improving quality of life and decreasing societal and payer costs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Gender Differences in Contribution of Smoking, Low Physical Activity, and High BMI to Increased Risk of Early Reoperation After TKA

BACKGROUND

The reliable preoperative identification of patients at a high risk of early reoperations (<2 years after primary surgery) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) could lead to adjustments of the surgical procedure and counseling, thus lowering the percentage of revision surgeries.

METHODS

The unselected cohort consisted of 1885 patients (695 men and 1190 women) who underwent TKA implantation between September 2010 and April 2017 at a single tertiary orthopedic center. Multivariate patient similarity networks were applied to identify patient groups at a high risk of early reoperations based on 25 preoperative parameters.

RESULTS

Early reoperations (109 cases, 5.8%) were less frequent in women (4.4%; median time to reoperation, 2.0 months) than in men (8.2%; 7.5 months), reaching the highest incidence in younger men (10.9%; <66 years). Of the tested preoperative parameters, the risk of reoperation in men was more likely associated with smoking or obesity (body mass index [BMI] > 30). In women, low physical activity and high BMI were the most likely risk factors for early reoperations. Other factors did not affect the risk of early reoperations, including the primary diagnosis, comorbidities, and surgeon-implanting TKA.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the effect of smoking, physical activity, and BMI on the risk of early reoperation after TKA, with the different contribution in men/women. Identification of patient subgroups with a higher risk of early revision after TKA is needed for clinical implementation of precision medicine in orthopedics.

Risk factors for chronic biofilm-related infection associated with implanted medical devices

BACKGROUND

The use of implanted medical devices is associated with a small but clinically important risk of foreign body infection. A key question is: why do some patients develop chronic infection associated with an implanted device, but most do not?

AIMS

The literature on patient-specific risk factors for chronic infections associated with five types of implants was surveyed to glean clues about the etiology of these infections.

SOURCES

Data were collected from 47 articles through calendar year 2017 for five categories of device-related infections: cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), hernia meshes, prosthetic hip and knee joints, prosthetic shoulder joints and breast implants.

CONTENT

Important risk factors include immunomodulation/steroid therapy, diabetes, smoking, and renal disease/haemodialysis-findings that point to a critical role of a compromised innate immune response in determining vulnerable subpopulations.

IMPLICATIONS

A model of biofilm-related device infection is presented that posits defects in the innate immune response both systemically and locally, in the immediate vicinity of an abiotic biomaterial. The limitations of in vitro and animal models of chronic device-related infections are discussed in this context as are implications for research and clinical practice.

Diagnosis and management of implant debris-associated inflammation

Introduction: Total joint replacement is one of the most common, safe, and efficacious operations in all of surgery. However, one major long-standing and unresolved issue is the adverse biological reaction to byproducts of wear from the bearing surfaces and modular articulations. These inflammatory reactions are mediated by the innate and adaptive immune systems.Areas covered: We review the etiology and pathophysiology of implant debris-associated inflammation, the clinical presentation and detailed work-up of these cases, and the principles and outcomes of non-operative and operative management. Furthermore, we suggest future strategies for prevention and novel treatments of implant-related adverse biological reactions.Expert opinion: The generation of byproducts from joint replacements is inevitable, due to repetitive loading of the implants. A clear understanding of the relevant biological principles, clinical presentations, investigative measures and treatments for implant-associated inflammatory reactions and periprosthetic osteolysis will help identify and treat patients with this issue earlier and more effectively. Although progressive implant-associated osteolysis is currently a condition that is treated surgically, with further research, it is hoped that non-operative biological interventions could prolong the lifetime of joint replacements that are otherwise functional and still salvageable.

Smoking Cessation Before and After Total Joint Arthroplasty-An Uphill Battle

BACKGROUND

Patients actively smoking at the time of primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) are at increased risk of perioperative complications. Employing strategies for smoking cessation has therefore become routine. A potential benefit of cessation in anticipation of TJA may be long-term cessation. However, success rates and the longevity of successful smoking cessation attempts before TJA have yet to be presented.

METHODS

Our institution's total joint registry documents self-reported smoking status. As such, all patients who underwent TJA from 2007 to 2018 were identified and grouped as nonsmokers, smokers (regularly smoking within 1 year before surgery), and former smokers (those who quit smoking within 1 year before surgery). Thereafter, postoperative smoking status was assessed with special attention to former smokers to see who remained smoke-free.

RESULTS

From the 28,758 primary TJAs identified, 91.3% (26,244) were nonsmokers, 7.3% (2109) were smokers, and 1.4% (405) had quit smoking before surgery. Among former smokers, 86% were abstinent 1 year postoperatively but only 45% were still abstinent 8 years postoperatively. Conversely, 7% of smokers at the time of surgery eventually quit and 6% of prior nonsmokers started smoking over the same time period.

CONCLUSION

Despite concerted efforts to help patients stop smoking before TJA, 7.3% remain smokers. Among those who are successful, less than half (45%) remain smoke-free after surgery. Compared to current smokers, however, patients who managed to quit before surgery are more likely to remain smoke-free after surgery. These findings demonstrate the tremendous challenge smoking represents in contemporary TJA practices.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic level III.

Cotinine Testing Improves Smoking Cessation Before Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Patients who are actively smoking at the time of primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) are at an increased risk of perioperative complications. Serum cotinine testing is a sensitive and specific method to verify abstinence from smoking and may therefore improve a patient's chance of smoking cessation. The primary purpose of this study was to assess whether cotinine testing improves the self-reported quit rate among smokers before TJA.

METHODS

Our hospital performs a high volume of TJAs and documents smoking status at each clinic visit (at 6-month intervals), as well as at the time of surgery through an institutional total joint registry. As part of a retrospective analysis, this information was used to identify all self-reported smokers (regularly cigarette smoking within 1 year of TJA) who underwent unilateral TJA from 2007 to 2018. The cohort had a mean age of 66 years, 55% were female, and the mean body mass index was 31 kg/m². Patients whose serum cotinine was obtained within 1 month before surgery were then separated from the cohort and compared to the smokers who did not undergo cotinine testing.

RESULTS

Of the 28,758 primary TJAs identified, 8.8% (2514) were smokers. Serum cotinine testing was obtained on 103 of these patients. The abstinence rate (by means of self-reporting) before surgery significantly improved from 15.8% to 28.2% in the untested vs cotinine-tested groups, respectively (P = .005). Among all patients who underwent cotinine testing, 77% were negative (abstinent) and an additional 15% had cotinine levels between 3 and 8 ng/mL representing passive tobacco exposure. Among patients who stated they had quit smoking, 15% still had positive cotinine tests.

CONCLUSION

Smoking cessation remains a major challenge in contemporary TJA practices despite a concerted effort to help patients quit. Our findings suggest that cotinine testing significantly improves the self-reported quit rates of smokers before surgery and helps identify the 15% who falsely report abstinence to ensure appropriate counseling of inherent risks.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic level III.

Obesity and smoking predict the results of two-stage exchange in septic revision hip arthroplasty: A cohort study

BACKGROUND

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is deemed to be the most serious complication following total hip arthroplasty. Obesity and smoking are known risk factors for PJI. However, the influence of these variables on infection free survival, of septic revision hip arthroplasty, is yet to be explored. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of obesity and smoking on the outcome of two-stage prosthetic exchange surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A consecutive series of 97 hips in 94 patients (69 male, 25 female, mean age 66±12 years), undergoing two-stage revision surgery for hip PJI, were investigated retrospectively, after a mean follow-up of 60 (24-170) months. Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meyer curves. A multivariate cox-regression model was applied to test for the influence of smoking or obesity (BMI≥30) after adjusting 16 potential patient-dependant variables.

HYPOTHESIS

The study hypothesis was that smoking and high BMI are predictors for the failure of septic revision hip arthroplasty. Failure of septic revision hip arthroplasty was defined as failure to eradicate the infection or eradication of the infection but failure to preserve the arthroplasty.

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier showed a cumulative survival proportion of 80.4%(standard error S.E 4%), of the definitive implant, at 5 years. Obese patients (BMI≥30) and smokers had a significantly lower 5-year survival of 60.9% (S.E 1%) and 50.6% (S.E 1.4%), respectively (p=0.001).

DISCUSSION

Obesity and smoking are both factors determining infection free survival in two-stage revision hip arthroplasty. Clinicians should be aware of potential complications and anticipate a higher likelihood of conversion to a Girdlestone resection or even amputation in this group of patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective cohort study.

Modifiable and Nonmodifiable Predictive Factors Associated with the Outcomes of Total Knee Arthroplasty

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a valuable treatment option for advanced osteoarthritis in patients unresponsive to conservative treatments. Despite overall satisfactory results, the rate of unsatisfied patients after TKA remains high, ranging from 5 to 40%. Different modifiable and nonmodifiable prognostic factors associated with TKA outcomes have been described. The correction, whenever possible, of modifiable factors is fundamental in preoperative patients' optimization protocols. Nonmodifiable factors can help in predicting the outcomes and creating the right expectations in the patients undergoing TKA. The goal of this review is to summarize the modifiable and nonmodifiable prognostic factors associated with TKA outcomes.

Choices, Compromises, and Controversies in Total Knee and Total Hip Arthroplasty Modifiable Risk Factors: What You Need to Know

BACKGROUND

Total joint arthroplasty has historically been very successful for most patients, yet some still incur a complication. In an era of value-based care, certain efforts need to be taken to optimize patients' risk profile before surgery to decrease the chances of readmission or surgical complication.

METHODS

We reviewed 10 key medical conditions and lifestyle factors that surgeons should improve before pursuing total joint arthroplasty and provide a summary of the available literature to guide certain optimization thresholds.

RESULTS

With careful attention to and the creation of a preoperative checklist, surgeons can identify key domains, including morbid obesity, malnutrition, diabetes, smoking, opioid use, poor dentition, cardiovascular disease, preoperative anemia, staphylococcus colonization, and psychological disorders and intervene based on an individual's areas of deficiencies.

CONCLUSION

By following stringent protocols and rescheduling surgery until optimization has occurred, we can work to provide patients the best chance for a successful outcome with an elective hip or knee arthroplasty.