Recent Trends in Blood Utilization After Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

Intraoperative cell salvage in revision hip arthroplasty

Aims

The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the evidence for the use of intraoperative cell salvage in patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty, and specifically to analyze the available data in order to quantify any associated reduction in the use of allogenic blood transfusion, and the volume which is used.

Methods

An electronic search of MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was completed from the date of their inception to 24 February 2022, using a search strategy and protocol created in conjunction with the PRISMA statement. Inclusion criteria were patients aged > 18 years who underwent revision hip arthroplasty when cell salvage was used. Studies in which pre-donated red blood cells were used were excluded. A meta-analysis was also performed using a random effects model with significance set at p = 0.05.

Results

Of the 283 studies which were identified, 11 were included in the systematic review, and nine in the meta-analysis. There was a significant difference (p < 0.001) in the proportion of patients requiring allogenic transfusion between groups, with an odds ratio of 0.331 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.165 to 0.663) associated with the use of cell salvage. For a total of 561 patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty who were treated with cell salvage, 247 (44.0%) required allogenic transfusion compared with 418 of 643 patients (65.0%) who were treated without cell salvage. For those treated with cell salvage, the mean volume of allogenic blood which was required was 1.95 units (390 ml) per patient (0.7 to 4.5 units), compared with 3.25 units (650 ml) per patient (1.2 to 7.0 units) in those treated without cell salvage. The mean difference of -1.91 units (95% CI -4.0 to 0.2) in the meta-analysis was also significant (p = 0.003).

Conclusion

We found a a significant reduction in the need for allogenic blood transfusion when cell salvage was used in patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty, supporting its routine use in these patients. Further research is required to determine whether this effect is associated with types of revision arthroplasty of differing complexity.

Predicting Factors for Blood Transfusion in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Using a Machine Learning Method

INTRODUCTION

Acute blood loss anemia requiring allogeneic blood transfusion is still a postoperative complication of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to use machine learning models for the prediction of blood transfusion after primary TKA and to identify contributing factors.

METHODS

A total of 2,093 patients who underwent primary TKA at our institution were evaluated using data extracted from the hospital quality improvement database to identify patient demographics and surgical variables that may be associated with blood transfusion. A multilayer perceptron neural network (MPNN) machine learning algorithm was used to predict risk factors for blood transfusion and factors associated with increased length of stay. Statistical analyses including bivariate correlate analysis, Chi-Square test, and Student t-test were performed for demographic analysis and to determine the correlation between blood transfusion and other variables.

RESULTS

The results demonstrated important factors associated with transfusion rates, including preoperative hemoglobin level, preoperative creatinine level, length of surgery, simultaneous bilateral surgeries, tranexamic acid usage, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status score, preoperative albumin level, ethanol usage, preoperative anticoagulation medications, age, and TKA type (conventional versus robotic-assisted). Patients who underwent a blood transfusion had a markedly greater length of stay than those who did not. The MPNN machine learning model achieved excellent performance across discrimination (AUC = 0.894).

DISCUSSION

The MPNN machine learning model showed its power as a statistical analysis tool to predict the ranking of factors for blood transfusion. Traditional statistics are unable to differentiate importance or predict in the same manner as a machine learning model.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that MPNN for the prediction of patient-specific blood transfusion rates after TKA represented a novel application of machine learning with the potential to improve preoperative planning for treatment outcomes.

Patient-relevant outcomes following elective, aseptic revision knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The aim of this systematic review was to summarise the evidence for the clinical effectiveness of revision knee arthroplasty (rKA) compared to non-operative treatment for the management of patients with elective, aseptic causes for a failed knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, AMED and PsychINFO were searched from inception to 1st December 2020 for studies on patients considering elective, aseptic rKA. Patient-relevant outcomes (PROs) were defined as implant survivorship, joint function, quality of life (QoL), complications and hospital admission impact.

RESULTS

No studies compared elective, aseptic rKA to non-operative management. Forty uncontrolled studies reported on PROs following elective, aseptic rKA (434434 rKA). Pooled estimates for implant survivorship were: 95.5% (95% CI 93.2-97.7%) at 1 year [seven studies (5524 rKA)], 90.8% (95% CI 87.6-94.0%) at 5 years [13 studies (5754 rKA)], 87.4% (95% CI 81.7-93.1%) at 10 years [nine studies (2188 rKA)], and 83.2% (95% CI 76.7-89.7%) at 15 years [two studies (452 rKA)]. Twelve studies (2382 rKA) reported joint function and/or QoL: all found large improvements from baseline to follow-up. Mortality rates were low (0.16% to 2% within 1 year) [four studies (353064 rKA)]. Post-operative complications were common (9.1 to 37.2% at 90 days).

CONCLUSION

Higher-quality evidence is needed to support patients with decision-making in elective, aseptic rKA. This should include studies comparing operative and non-operative management. Implant survivorship following elective, aseptic rKA was ~ 96% at 1 year, ~ 91% at 5 years and ~ 87% at 10 years. Early complications were common after elective, aseptic rKA and the rates summarised here can be shared with patients during informed consent.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42020196922.

Artificial neural networks for the prediction of transfusion rates in primary total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Despite advancements in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and the increased utilization of tranexamic acid, acute blood loss anemia necessitating allogeneic blood transfusion persists as a post-operative complication. The prevalence of allogeneic blood transfusion in primary THA has been reported to be as high as 9%. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate novel machine learning models for the prediction of transfusion rates following primary total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

A total of 7265 consecutive patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty were evaluated using a single tertiary referral institution database. Patient charts were manually reviewed to identify patient demographics and surgical variables that may be associated with transfusion rates. Four state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms were developed to predict transfusion rates following primary THA, and these models were assessed by discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

The factors most significantly associated with transfusion rates include tranexamic acid usage, bleeding disorders, and pre-operative hematocrit (< 33%). The four machine learning models all achieved excellent performance across discrimination (AUC > 0.78), calibration, and decision curve analysis.

CONCLUSION

This study developed machine learning models for the prediction of patient-specific transfusion rates following primary total hip arthroplasty. The results represent a novel application of machine learning, and has the potential to improve outcomes and pre-operative planning.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, case-control retrospective analysis.

Routine Type and Screens Are Unnecessary in Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty: Follow-up After a Change in Practice

Background

Routine type and screens (T&S) prior to total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are common despite low transfusion rates. Our institution implemented a practice change after previously demonstrating a transfusion rate of 1.06%. The purpose of this study is to present the follow-up data 1 year after the practice change of discontinuing routine T&S orders in primary total joint arthroplasty.

Methods

A practice change was implemented discontinuing routine T&S orders prior to elective primary total joint arthroplasties. We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data on preoperative T&S, hemoglobin values, transfusion rates, bleeding disorders, and anticoagulation status.

Results

A total of 663 patients were included in the study (273 THAs and 390 TKAs). The cumulative transfusion rate was 0.75. No patients received an intraoperative transfusion. Three patients (1.1%) received a postoperative transfusion after THA, and 3 patients (0.5%) received a transfusion after TKA. The mean preoperative hemoglobin in the transfused patients was 12.1 g/dL. Thirteen patients underwent a preoperative T&S (2.0%), and only 2 required transfusion (15.4%). Only 1 patient who required transfusion was on preoperative anticoagulation, and no patients with bleeding disorders required transfusions. Discontinuing routine T&S resulted in an estimated cost savings of $124,325.50.

Conclusions

Discontinuation of routine T&S did not result in any adverse consequences. If required, T&S can safely be performed intraoperatively or postoperatively. Surgeons may consider obtaining a T&S if their preoperative hemoglobin is less than 11-12 g/dL or if significant blood loss is expected in a complex primary total joint arthroplasty.

Transfusion Rates in the Operative Treatment of Prosthetic Hip and Knee Infection

Surgery for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) can often lead to significant blood loss, necessitating allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT). The use of ABT is associated with higher rates of morbidity and death in revision total joint arthroplasty, particularly in the treatment of PJI. We compared ABT rates by procedure type among patients treated for PJI. We retrospectively reviewed 143 operative cases of hip and knee PJI performed at our institution between 2016 and 2018. Procedures were categorized as irrigation and debridement (I&D) with modular component exchange (modular component exchange), explantation with I&D and placement of an antibiotic spacer (explantation), I&D with antibiotic spacer exchange (spacer exchange), or antibiotic spacer removal and prosthetic reimplantation (reimplantation). Rates of ABT and the number of units transfused were assessed. Factors associated with ABT were assessed with a multilevel mixed-effects regression model. Of the cases, 77 (54%) required ABT. The highest rates of ABT occurred during explantation (74%) and spacer exchange (72%), followed by reimplantation (36%) and modular component exchange (33%). A lower preoperative hemoglobin level was associated with higher odds of ABT. Explantation, reimplantation, and spacer exchange were associated with greater odds of ABT. Antibiotic spacer exchange and explantation were associated with greater odds of multiple-unit transfusion. Rates of ABT remain high in the surgical treatment of PJI. Antibiotic spacer exchange and explantation procedures had high rates of multiple-unit transfusions, and additional units of blood should be made available. Preoperative anemia should be treated when possible, and further refinement of blood management protocols for prosthetic joint infection is necessary. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(6):353-359.].

Who Is Still Receiving Blood Transfusions After Primary and Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

Incidence of blood transfusions after primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty (primary total hip arthroplasty [pTHA], revision THA [rTHA], primary total knee arthroplasty [pTKA], and revision TKA [rTKA]) has been decreasing for a multitude of reasons. The purpose of this study was to assess whether transfusion rates have continued to decline and evaluate patient factors associated with transfusions.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was queried to identify patients undergoing pTHA, pTKA, rTHA, and rTKA between 2011 and 2019. Patients undergoing bilateral procedures and arthroplasty for fracture, infection, or tumor were excluded. Trends in blood transfusions were assessed. Patient factor association with blood transfusions was evaluated using 2018 and 2019 data.

RESULTS

Transfusion rates decreased from 21.4% in 2011 to 2.5% in 2019 for pTHA (P < .0001). For pTKA, transfusion rates declined from 17.6% to 0.7% (P < .0001). In rTHA, the transfusion rate decreased from 33.5% to 12.0% from 2011 to 2019 (P < .0001). Transfusion rates declined from 19.4% to 2.6% for rTKA during the study period (P < .0001). Transfusions were more frequent in patients who were older, female, with more comorbidities, with lower hematocrit, receiving nonspinal anesthesia, and with longer operative time. Lower preoperative hematocrit, history of bleeding disorders, and preoperative transfusion were associated with greater odds for postoperative transfusion after multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Transfusions after both primary and revision total joint arthroplasty have continued to decrease. Studies of arthroplasty complications should account for decreasing transfusions when assessing overall complication rates. Future studies should consider interventions to further reduce transfusions in revision arthroplasty.

Risk Factors for Blood Transfusions in Primary Anatomic and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine risk factors for blood transfusion in primary anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) performed for osteoarthritis.

METHODS

Patients who underwent anatomic or reverse TSA for a diagnosis of primary osteoarthritis were identified in a national surgical database from 2005 to 2018 by utilizing both CPT and ICD-9/ICD-10 codes. Univariate analysis was performed on the two transfused versus non-transfused cohorts to compare for differences in comorbidities and demographics. Independent risk factors for perioperative blood transfusions were identified via multivariate regression models.

RESULTS

305 transfused and 18,124 nontransfused patients were identified. Female sex (p<0.001), age >85 years (p=0.001), insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (p=0.001), dialysis dependence (p=0.001), acute renal failure (p=0.012), hematologic disorders (p=0.010), disseminated cancer (p<0.001), ASA ≥ 3 (p<0.001), and functional dependence (p=0.001) were shown to be independent risk factors for blood transfusions on multivariate logistic regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

Several independent risk factors for blood transfusion following anatomic/reverse TSA for osteoarthritis were identified. Awareness of these risk factors can help surgeons and perioperative care teams to both identify and optimize high-risk patients to decrease both transfusion requirements and its associated complications in this patient population. Level of Evidence: III.

Blood transfusion and venous thromboembolism trends and risk factors in primary and aseptic revision total hip and knee arthroplasties: A nationwide investigation of 736,061 cases

BACKGROUND

Over the last years, new transfusion guidelines and pharmaceuticals have been introduced in primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty (P-THA, P-TKA, R-THA, R-TKA). In the US, a substantial decrease in transfusions has been observed in recent years. Little data exists on the subject in Europe. In this context we aimed to analyze: (1) Is there also a significant decrease in blood transfusion for these procedures in Germany? (2) Which patient and hospital related factors are associated with the risk of blood transfusion? (3) Is there a trend in complications, especially venous thromboembolism and stroke events that can be linked to tranexamic acid use?

HYPOTHESIS

There is a significant trend in decreasing blood transfusions in hip and knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

Using nationwide healthcare insurance data for inpatient hospital treatment, 736,061 cases treated between January 2011 and December 2017 were included (318,997 P-THAs, 43,780 R-THAs, 338,641 P-TKAs, 34,643 R-TKAs). Multivariable logistic regression was used to model the odds of transfusion as a function of the year of surgery. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

RESULTS

In each cohort the odds of transfusion decreased over time (2017 vs. 2011 (reference): P-THA: OR 0.42 (95%CI: 0.39-0.45), P-TKA: OR 0.41 (95%CI: 0.37-0.46), R-THA: OR 0.52 (95%CI: 0.47-0.58), R-TKA: OR 0.53 (95%CI: 0.46-0.61). Patient-related risk factors for blood transfusion included older age, female gender, lower Body Mass Index, comorbidities such as renal failure, cardiac arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, valvular disease, coagulopathy, depression, and antithrombotic medication prior to surgery. Venous thromboembolism or stroke events did not increase over the study period.

DISCUSSION

The incidence of blood transfusions in primary and revision TKA and THA decreased over the study period. This may be due to new transfusion guidelines and the introduction of novel pharmaceuticals such as tranexamic acid. A further improved patient blood management and a focus on vulnerable patient groups might lead to a further future reduction of transfusions, especially in R-THA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; comparative observational study.

Primary and revision total hip arthroplasty with uncemented acetabular components in patients with Paget's disease

INTRODUCTION

Paget's disease affects 3-4% of the population; however, literature describing outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in this population are limited. Given the known concerns with bleeding, heterotopic ossification (HO), and component loosening, we describe our results with primary and revision THAs in Paget's disease with emphasis on implant survivorship, radiographic results, and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We identified 25 THAs performed with contemporary uncemented acetabular components in patients with Paget's disease from 1999 to 2014. Mean age and follow-up were 78 and 7 years.

RESULTS

In primary THAs, survivorship free from aseptic acetabular and femoral loosening was 100% and 94% at 8 years. 7 patients (41%) received blood transfusions. HO was seen in 9 (53%). Mean Harris Hip Score (HHS) improved from 49 to 76. In revision THAs, survivorship free from acetabular and/or femoral aseptic loosening was 100% at 5 years. 3 patients (38%) received a transfusion. HO was seen in 5 (63%). Mean HHS improved from 52 to 77. There were no radiographic signs of aseptic loosening among unrevised cases in either group.

DISCUSSION

Our investigation demonstrates that concerns with acetabular fixation in Paget's disease have been mitigated with contemporary uncemented acetabular components. Complications previously noted, namely intraoperative bleeding and HO, continue to be of concern.

Independent Risk Factors for Transfusion in Contemporary Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The incidence of transfusion in contemporary revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains high despite recent advances in blood management, including the use of tranexamic acid. The purpose of this prospective investigation was to determine independent risk factors for transfusion in revision THA.

METHODS

Six centers prospectively collected data on 175 revision THAs. A multivariable logistic analysis was performed to determine independent risk factors for transfusion. Revisions were categorized into subgroups for analysis, including femur-only, acetabulum-only, both-component, explantation with spacer, and second-stage reimplantation. Patients undergoing an isolated modular exchange were excluded.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients required at least one unit of blood (16.6%). In the logistic model, significant risk factors for transfusion were lower preoperative hemoglobin, higher preoperative international normalized ratio (INR), and longer operative time (P < .01, P = .04, P = .05, respectively). For each preoperative 1g/dL decrease in hemoglobin, the chance of transfusion increased by 79%. For each 0.1-unit increase in the preoperative INR, transfusion chance increased by 158%. For each additional operative hour, the chance of transfusion increased by 74%. There were no differences in transfusion rates among categories of revision hip surgery (P = .23). No differences in demographic or surgical variables were found between revision types.

CONCLUSION

Despite the use of tranexamic acid, transfusions are commonly required in revision THA. Preoperative hemoglobin and INR optimization are recommended when medically feasible. Efforts should also be made to decrease operative time when technically possible.

Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in Jehovah's Witnesses at a Public Hospital: Practical Recommendations for a Low-Resource Setting

Revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a major reconstructive procedure traditionally associated with significant blood loss. Jehovah’s Witnesses (JW) do not accept blood or blood product transfusions because of their religious beliefs. When confronted with a JW patient requiring a complex arthroplasty procedure, surgeons face moral and ethical questions and may be reluctant to perform surgery. A successful outcome depends on several factors including surgical and anesthetic expertise, a range of revision implants, and a multimodal blood management protocol. While these resources are readily available in a developed country, in many of the developing Caribbean islands, the healthcare system is underfunded and under-resourced.

Here, we describe our experience performing a revision THA on a JW patient in the Caribbean. Through this case report, we aim to illustrate our approach to blood management by exploring the fundamental elements that were employed in a low-resource setting. We believe that the extrapolation of these crucial principles to the broader category of primary arthroplasty in the general population can be used to reduce the rate of blood transfusion, increase access to surgery, and improve outcomes.

Costs of unicompartmental compared with total knee arthroplasty : a matched cohort study over ten years

AIMS

The aim of this study was to compare ten-year longitudinal healthcare costs and revision rates for patients undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

The Humana database was used to compare 2,383 patients undergoing UKA between 2007 and 2009, who were matched 1:1 from a cohort of 63,036 patients undergoing primary TKA based on age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Medical and surgical complications were tracked longitudinally for one year following surgery. Rates of revision surgery and cumulative mean healthcare costs were recorded for this period of time and compared between the cohorts.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing TKA had significantly higher rates of manipulation under anaesthesia (3.9% vs 0.9%; p < 0.001), deep vein thrombosis (5.0% vs 3.1%; p < 0.001), pulmonary embolism (1.5% vs 0.8%; p = 0.001), and renal failure (4.2% vs 2.2%; p < 0.001). Revision rates, however, were significantly higher for UKA at five years (6.0% vs 4.2%; p = 0.007) and ten years postoperatively (6.5% vs 4.4%; p = 0.002). Longitudinal-related healthcare costs for patients undergoing TKA were greater than for those undergoing UKA at one year ($24,771 vs $22,071; p < 0.001) and five years following surgery ($26,549 vs $25,730; p < 0.001); however, the mean costs of TKA were comparable to UKA at ten years ($26,877 vs $26,891; p = 0.425).

CONCLUSION

Despite higher revision rates, patients undergoing UKA had lower mean healthcare costs than those undergoing TKA up to ten years following the procedure, at which time costs were comparable. In the era of value-based care, surgeons and policymakers should be aware of the costs involved with these procedures. UKA was associated with fewer complications at one year postoperatively but higher revision rates at five and ten years. While UKA was significantly less costly than TKA at one and five years, costs at ten years were comparable with a mean difference of only $14. Lowering the risk of revision surgery should be targeted as a source of cost savings for both UKA and TKA as the mean related healthcare costs were 2.5-fold higher in patients requiring revision surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):23-31.

Blood loss after revision knee arthroplasty is 1.38- to 2.17-fold higher than after primary knee arthroplasty: A retrospective analysis of 898 cases

BACKGROUND

There are a number of factors that influence blood loss during and after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and revision TKA (rTKA). The purpose of this study was to provide a factorial assessment that would aid surgeons in managing expected blood loss in rTKA, when compared to TKA. The first question asked was the blood loss and transfusions between TKA and rTKA and the second question was risk factors for blood loss after rTKA.

HYPOTHESIS

Blood loss in any rTKA is higher than in TKA by a factor of 2.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective single-centre consecutive series of rTKA between 2006 and 2018 was performed. Based on the rTKA types identified in joint registries, 4 rTKA cohorts were created: aseptic minor rTKA, aseptic major rTKA, 1st stage, and 2nd stage septic rTKA. A consecutive TKA cohort from the same study period was used to create a propensity score matched cohort with the aseptic major rTKA cohort.

RESULT

A total of 622 rTKA were identified. Aseptic major rTKA had double the median blood loss than TKA. The lowest blood loss was observed in the TKA group followed by aseptic minor rTKA, and the highest in 2nd stage septic rTKA. The median total blood loss was higher in all rTKA by a factor ranging between 1.38 and 2.17. Higher age, female gender, lower preoperative hemoglobin, chronic heart disease and history of myocardial infarction were risk factors for increased blood loss. The type of rTKA performed was not predictive of blood loss in the linear regression analysis.

DISCUSSION

Blood loss after rTKA is 1.38 to 2.17-fold higher than after TKA. The blood loss observed in 2nd stage septic rTKA and aseptic major rTKA was the highest. Older female patients, with a low preoperative hemoglobin, were identified to be at the highest risk of blood loss after rTKA. Strategies for further blood loss reductions need to be utilised to the fullest extent for these procedures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; retrospective prognostic study.

Factors Associated With Perioperative Transfusion in Lower Extremity Revision Arthroplasty Under a Restrictive Blood Management Protocol

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 37% of patients undergoing lower extremity revision total joint arthroplasty (TJA) receive allogeneic blood transfusions (ABTs), which are associated with increased risk of morbidity and death. It is important to identify patient factors associated with needing ABT because the health of higher-risk patients can be optimized preoperatively and their need for ABT can be minimized. Our goal was to identify the patient and surgical factors independently associated with perioperative ABT in revision TJA.

METHODS

We included all 251 lower extremity revision TJA cases performed at our academic tertiary care center from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2018. We assessed the following factors for associations with perioperative ABT: patient age, sex, race, body mass index, preoperative hemoglobin level, and infection status (ie, infection as indication for revision TJA); use of vasopressors, tranexamic acid (TXA), surgical drains, tourniquets, and intraoperative cell salvage; and procedure type (hip versus knee), procedure complexity (according to the number of components revised), and surgical time. Multivariable regression was used to identify factors independently associated with perioperative ABT.

RESULTS

The following characteristics were independently associated with greater odds of perioperative ABT: preoperative hemoglobin level (odds ratio [OR], 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5 to 2.2), infectious indication for revision (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.3 to 9.7), and procedure complexity. TXA use was a negative predictor of ABT (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.98). Compared with polyethylene liner exchanges, single-component revisions (OR, 14; 95% CI, 3.6 to 56) and dual-component revisions (OR, 7.8; 95% CI, 2.3 to 26) were associated with greater odds of ABT.

DISCUSSION

Patients with preoperative anemia, those undergoing revision TJA because of infection, those who did not receive TXA, and those undergoing more complex TJA procedures may have greater odds of requiring ABT. We recommend preoperative optimization of the health of these patients to reduce the need for ABT.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, prognostic study.

Role of arthroplasty in the Jehovah's Witness population

BACKGROUND

Total joint arthroplasties aim to improve quality of life from joint-related pain. Jehovah's Witnesses refuse blood products due to their religious beliefs. Surgeons may be reluctant to perform arthroplasty procedures on these patients for fear of uncontrolled bleeding. However, we hypothesize that through preoperative optimization, arthroplasty can be performed safely.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 184 total joint arthroplasties in Jehovah's Witnesses between 2011 and 2019. Each patient was enrolled in the institutions' Bloodless Medicine program. Hemoglobin levels were recorded through standard laboratory testing while in the hospital. Primary outcomes were changes in preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin measures, short-term outcomes measures, and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 103 total knee arthroplasties (8 revisions) and 81 total hip arthroplasties (5 revisions) were performed. Hemoglobin drift was 2.5 ± 1.0 for primary TKA and 2.6 ± 1.3 for primary THA (p = 0.570). Hemoglobin drift was 1.9 ± 0.9 for revision TKA and 1.9 ± 0.2 for revision THA (p = 0.990). Only 2.7% of patients met the transfusion requirement of 7 g/dL. The major complication rate for the cohort was 1.6% systemic and 4.9% local, respectively, with no mortalities. The overall readmission rate was 2.7%.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the largest reported sample of Jehovah's Witness patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty. Postoperative hemoglobin values did not prompt additional intervention in the overwhelming majority of patients, and complication rates were acceptable. Our data suggest that primary arthroplasty is safe in the Jehovah's Witness population. Additionally, we show preliminary evidence that revision arthroplasty is safe in Jehovah's Witness patients.

Use of Topical Tranexamic Acid Reduces Direct and Indirect Blood Loss and Transfusion Rates in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

In primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), evidence supports the use of tranexamic acid (TXA) as an effective strategy for reducing blood loss, but scant evidence supports its use in revision THA.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We aimed to evaluate whether the use of topical TXA in revision THA is associated with less blood loss and lower transfusion rates and to assess its safety, specifically as it relates to thromboembolic complications.

METHODS

In this retrospective comparative study, two groups who underwent revision THA between 2005 and 2017 were defined: 98 patients who received 3 g of topical TXA (study group) and 475 patients who did not receive TXA (control group). Subjects were divided into subgroups according to the type of revision. Hemoglobin and hematocrit levels, blood loss, and transfusions were recorded. The follow-up period was 6 weeks.

RESULTS

Median estimated blood loss, hidden blood loss, hemoglobin drop, and transfusion rates were significantly lower in the study group. The rates of post-operative thromboembolism were similar in the two groups. According to subgroup analysis, patients with revision of the femoral component, both components, and staged exchange revisions showed significantly lower rates of transfusion.

CONCLUSION

Topical TXA administration during revision THA effectively reduced direct and indirect blood loss, including hidden losses, without increasing the rates of thromboembolic events. This effect appeared to be enhanced when the femoral component was revised.