Effect of the Referencing System on the Posterior Condylar Offset and Anterior Flange-Bone Contact in Posterior Cruciate-Substituting Total Knee Arthroplasty

An Evaluation of Anatomic Referencing for Femoral Component Sizing Using Computed Tomography-Based Computer Modeling

One of the critical steps in total knee arthroplasty is femoral component positioning and sizing. Historically, there was wider variability between femoral component sizes, necessitating the concepts of anterior referencing (AR) and posterior referencing (PR). With the introduction of smaller increments between sizes, the concept of anatomic referencing has been introduced to replace AR and PR. The intent of this study was to validate the concept of anatomic referencing and show that with 2 mm increments in femoral sizes, the femoral component can be placed flush to the anterior cortex while maintaining posterior condylar offset (PCO). Digital surface models were created using 515 femurs from an established computed tomography database. Virtual bone resections, component sizing and placement were performed assuming neutral mechanical axis and a cartilage thickness of 2 mm. The appropriately sized femoral component, which had 2 mm incremental sizes, was placed flush with the anterior cortex with restoration of the PCO. The anterior-posterior distance from the posterior surface of the component to the medial and lateral surfaces of the posterior condylar cartilage were measured. The medial condyle was the limiting condyle in the majority of cases (73%). The average medial gap after appropriate femoral component matching was 0.6 mm (0.39-1.41 mm) across all sizes. The overall average condylar gap was 1.02 mm. The most common femoral component was a size 7 (57.2 mm) and the average femoral AP width was 55.9 mm. Anatomic referencing with an implant system that has 2-mm increments in femoral component sizing provides an alternative to AR and PR without compromise. Anatomic referencing allows for perfect alignment of the anterior flange of the femoral component to the anterior cortex of the femur while restoring the native PCO to within 1 mm. This avoids having to choose between AR or PR when in between femoral sizes.

Maintenance of the joint line and posterior condylar offset are the most notable variables for successful outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Controversy regarding which variables should be prioritized for better outcomes in revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA) exists. This study aimed to comprehensively analyze the variables affecting RTKA outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified 87 RTKAs in 82 patients who were performed between March 2014 and February 2020. Range of motion (ROM), including flexion contracture (FC) and further flexion (FF), was analyzed according to the covariates. The covariates included mode of failure, joint line position, anteroposterior (AP) position, rotational alignment of the femoral component, and patellofemoral alignment. The differences between the final follow-up values of each RTKA variable and those of the native knee were evaluated. The clinical outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed between the joint line positions of the RTKA and native knees. The patellar and AP positions of the femoral component were restored to pre-TKA values. The femoral component had an external rotation of 2.78° compared with the native knee. In multivariable stepwise regression analysis, restoration of the adductor tubercle joint line and posterior condylar offset (PCO) were significant variables affecting ROM. Septic RTKA (33 knees) resulted in poor FF outcomes (p = 0.030) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index stiffness (WOMAC S) scores (p < 0.001), compared with aseptic RTKA (54 knees).

CONCLUSIONS

Restoration of the joint line position and PCO are crucial factors for improved ROM in RTKA. Joint line elevation in RTKA resulted in worse ROM than joint line lowering. In addition, RTKA due to septic failure had inferior ROM and WOMAC S scores compared with RTKA due to aseptic failure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, cohort study.

Anatomic Referencing Restores the Anatomy of the Distal Femur with Less Compromise

Historically, anterior referencing and posterior referencing are two specific techniques that surgeons can use for proper sizing of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In this review, we introduce the concept of "anatomic referencing" which has become useful with more incremental sizes of the femoral component to more perfectly match the native anatomy of each patient and reduce overstuffing of the patellofemoral joint and medial-lateral (ML) overhang. Fifty consecutive TKA cases were reviewed where the novel anatomic referencing technique was used. Lateral radiographic projections were obtained preoperatively and postoperatively. The posterior condylar offset (PCO) was evaluated on the lateral radiographs by measuring the distance between the tangent line of the femoral diaphysis posterior cortex and the posterior condylar margin. PCO ratio (PCOR) was calculated by dividing the PCO by the distance between the posterior condylar border and a tangent line along the anterior cortex of the femoral diaphysis. Forty-five patients (50 TKAs) were reviewed. Average age of the patients was 70.34, range: 47-91. There were 19 males and 26 females reviewed in this series. On average, the delta PCOR was 0.022 (standard deviation = 0.032; min: -0.049, max: 0.082). When grouping our results into three main groups: < -0.03, -0.03 to 0.03, and > 0.03, we found that 62% fell within the -0.03 to 0.03 range. There was no statistically significant difference in delta PCOR between standard and narrow implants (p = 0.418). The proposed novel anatomic referencing technique has allowed for proper sizing of patients' femurs in the anteroposterior and ML direction while avoiding component overhang or the need for component downsizing to obtain a proper ML fit. This radiographic review confirmed this to be a highly accurate and reproducible technique.

Does referencing system affect the selection of implant size, position and gap balance in total knee arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

(1) To evaluate if referencing system affects selection of implant size, position, and gap balance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with the use of contemporary implant designs and (2) to describe the authors' intraoperative sizing strategy using anterior referencing (AR) and posterior referencing (PR) systems.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of 270 consecutive patients (397 knees) who underwent primary TKA with an AR or PR system. Selection of implant size, mediolateral and anteroposterior alignment of the femoral component, as well as gaps were compared between groups.

RESULTS

In the AR group, more patients had femoral components which were upsized or downsized compared to those in the PR group (29.5% vs 12.0% respectively) and in patients who underwent bilateral TKA, 49.4% of those in the AR group had femur component size asymmetry. The AR group had better medio-lateral (ML) fit over the distal cutting surface area, smaller change in anterior offset but higher incidence of anterior notching when compared to the PR group. Posterior condylar offset (PCO) was restored in both groups and gap differences in flexion-extension and ML were comparable. There was also no difference in clinical scores and ROM between groups at 2-years follow-up.

CONCLUSION

In this study, conventional implications related to referencing system were not observed. In practice, AR systems can restore PCO while PR systems do not result in increased anterior notching or anterior overstuffing. Differences observed in this study are most likely related to implant design specifics and surgical technique.

Clinical relevance of roll-back replacement of ultra congruent total knee arthroplasty: comparison of mid-term outcomes with posterior stabilizing design

INTRODUCTION

The outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remain controversial, and we do not know which factors are important for successful outcomes. This study aimed to compare the mid-term outcomes of different conceptual designs by evaluating the radiological and clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 478 total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) were enrolled and allocated into groups I [posterior stabilizing (PS) with anterior referencing (AR)], II [PS with posterior referencing (PR), and III [ultra-congruent (UC) TKA)]. Preoperative findings, last follow-up clinical outcomes, and final follow-up radiological and indirect assessments of the femoral rollback were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 72.6 ± 12.9 months. The tourniquet was used samely applied to every group. Flexion contracture was significantly larger in group III than in groups I and II (3.3 ± 2.7, p < 0.001), and further flexion was significantly smaller in group III (130.0° ± 2.7°, p < 0.001). Among the radiological parameters, posterior osteophyte formation was the most common in group III (67.8%). The rollback distance was significantly smaller in group III than in groups I and II (p < 0.001). The active deep flexion angle was affected by the posterior condylar offset (PCO) ratio, and the contact point changed the distance (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

PS TKAs showed better ROMs than UC TKAs; however, no differences were noted in the clinical outcome scales. The flexion angle was affected by the PCOR and rollback at both PS and UC TKAs. However, rollback negatively affected the flexion angle during UC TKAs. An inappropriate femoral rollback was identified, and femoral osteophyte formation was determined to be the most prominent in UC TKAs. Level of evidence Level III comparative study.

Effect of femoral posterior condyle offset on knee joint function after total knee replacement: a network meta-analysis and a sequential retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted with the aim to compare the effect of posterior condyle offset (PCO) changes on knee joint function of patients following total knee replacement (TKR).

METHODS

Electronic and manual searches were performed in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to September 2019. Network meta-analysis combined direct and indirect evidence to assess the weighted mean difference (WMD) and surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) of different PCO changes (PCO ≤ - 2 mm, - 2 mm < PCO < 0 mm, 0 mm ≤ PCO < 2 mm and PCO ≥ 2 mm) on knee joint function after TKR. Then 103 OA patients undergoing unilateral TKR were included and the effect of PCO on the postoperative knee function was examined.

RESULTS

Totally, 5 cohort studies meeting the inclusion criteria were enrolled in this analysis. The results of meta-analysis showed that patients with 0 mm ≤ PCO < 2 mm after TKR had a better recovery of joint function (flexion contracture: 28.67%; KS functional score: 78.67%; KS knee score: 75.00%) than the remaining three groups. However, the knee flexion (77.00%) of patients with PCO ≤ - 2 mm after TKR was superior to the other three groups. Retrospective study also revealed a significant correlation between PCO changes and the flexion contracture, further flexion and KS functional score of patients after TKR, in which each functional knee score of patients with 0 mm ≤ PCO < 2 mm was better than the others.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest a close correlation between PCO magnitude and knee joint function after TKR and that 0 mm ≤ PCO < 2 mm is superior to other changes for joint function after TKR.

Does increased femoral component size options reduce anterior femoral notching in total knee replacement?

OBJECTIVE

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is currently the best option for management of advanced knee arthritis for patients who have exhausted conservative management. There have been significant implant design improvements and this is a continuing process to help the surgeon replicate patient anatomy and kinematics. Amongst the many variables in implantation to achieve a well-functioning TKA, getting optimal femoral component sizing is one. Every implant system has certain discreet implant sizes and the surgeon has to strive to obtain the best fit possible for the patient and attain a well aligned and stable TKA. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of various femoral component sizes being implanted with a system which has 2.5 mm antero-posterior increment between sizes, and to assess the incidence of anterior femoral notching when using a posterior referencing system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 739 TKAs implanted in 532 patients between January 2013 and January 2016 at a single center using a single posterior stabilized implant system was done. Patient demographics and femur component size used was obtained from hospital patient records. Immediate post-operative radiographs were analyzed to look for anterior femoral notching and presence of this was classified according to Tayside classification. A telephonic follow up at minimum 2 tears post-surgery was done to interview for occurrence of supracondylar femur fracture or revision for any other causes.

RESULTS

There were 207 bilateral and 325 unilateral TKAs performed in 532 patients during the study period. There were 245 males and 287 females with an average age of 61.3 years (43-81 years, SD = 7.2). The most commonly used femoral component was 60 mm and an intermediate size prosthesis was used in 43.11% patients. The incidence of femoral notching ranged from 0 to 6.3%. No patient had sustained a supracondylar condylar fracture at minimum 2 years follow up.

CONCLUSION

The availability of a larger number of femoral components in a TKA system allows the surgeon the modularity to choose and obtain the best fit possible. Restoration of posterior condylar offset, preventing anterior notching, medio-lateral overhang and patellofemoral joint stuffing are greatly dependent on correct femoral component sizing. The findings from our study underscore the need to use an implant system with as many femoral size options as possible with lesser increments in between sizes to minimize anterior femoral notching when using a posterior referencing technique.

Morphometric Assessment of Resected Femoral Cut Surface in Korean Knees and Its Fitting With Western-Designed Femoral Components

BACKGROUND

This study aimed at assessing the morphometry of resected femurs in Korean patients during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and comparing these measurements with current Western-designed femoral component dimensions.

METHODS

This single-blind, prospective, randomized, controlled trial involved intraoperative measurements for 271 femoral component implantations from 3 contemporary TKA systems, with 2 systems offering narrow sizing options. The difference between femoral component dimensions and the resected surface of distal femur was measured in millimeters at 5 distinct zones.

RESULTS

Overhang of standard femoral component was common in the anterior-medial condyle and anterior-lateral condyle ranging from 50.8% to 99.0% and 21.5% to 88.0%, respectively. With narrow femoral components, the rate of overhang reduced to 21.5%-30.2% and 9.2%-32.1%. Conversely, underhang rates were higher over the anterior flange width, middle medial-lateral and posterior medial-lateral zones. Standard components displayed higher underhang rates at these zones compared to narrow components. The good fit rate for femoral component was low among the 3 systems ranging from 1.0% to 56.0%. System with narrow option sizing increases the underhang rates in males, while improving the component fit among females at similar zones with rate ranging from 5.2% to 52.9%.

CONCLUSION

Currently available TKA implant designs may not provide a perfect match for the distal femoral shape of the Korean population. The availability of implants with standard and narrow options can substantially improve the optimal fitting of femoral components in the Korean population.