1
|
The Effects of Certificate-of-Need Laws on the Quality of Hospital Medical Services. JOURNAL OF RISK AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/jrfm15060272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
Certificate-of-need (CON) laws restrict entry into health services by requiring healthcare providers to seek approval from state healthcare regulators before making any major capital expenditures. An important question is whether CON laws influence the quality of medical services in CON law states. For instance, if CON laws actually lower the quality of medical services, they fail to achieve their intended effect. This paper tests the hypothesis that hospitals in states with CON laws provide lower-quality services than hospitals in states without CON laws. Our overall results suggest that CON regulations lead to lower-quality care for some quality measures and have little or no effect on other quality standards. The results remain consistent across several robustness tests.
Collapse
|
2
|
Utilization and Reimbursement Trends Based on Certificate of Need in Single-level Cervical Discectomy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2021; 29:e518-e522. [PMID: 33273408 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-19-00224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2019] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare utilization and reimbursement for cervical discectomy in certificate of need (CON) and non-CON states. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Cervical discectomy is a commonly performed procedure, but little is known about utilization and reimbursement patterns in the CON setting. INTRODUCTION Cervical discectomy is increasingly used and remains effective. Increasing healthcare costs have led to decreased reimbursement and a push toward outpatient procedures. CON programs were established to ensure that expansion of medical facilities were within acceptable use; however, the literature on their impact in spine surgery is limited. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of CON status on both reimbursement and utilization in cervical decompression in both inpatient and outpatient settings. METHODS We analyzed a private payer and Medicare database from 2007 to 2015. All single-level cervical discectomies were selected then split into CON and non-CON states. Each group was then further split into inpatient and outpatient. Utilization and reimbursement were analyzed using the compound annual growth rate (CAGR), with reimbursement adjusted by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index. RESULTS We identified 1,580 single level cervical decompressions in our study period: 888 were done in the inpatient setting, whereas 692 were done in the outpatient setting. Adjusted reimbursement only increased in the non-CON outpatient setting, with a CAGR of 2.0%. All other settings had decreased reimbursement. Utilization increased across all four settings, with the highest growth seen in the CON outpatient setting, with a CAGR of 12.7%. The highest average reimbursement was in the non-CON outpatient setting at $4,237. DISCUSSION Cervical discectomy is seeing increased utilization most rapidly in the outpatient setting, although reimbursement is declining with the exception of procedures done in the non-CON outpatient setting. Surgeons should be aware of these trends in the changing healthcare economic climate. STUDY DESIGN A retrospective database review.
Collapse
|
3
|
Schultz OA, Shi L, Lee M. Assessing the Efficacy of Certificate of Need Laws Through Total Joint Arthroplasty. J Healthc Qual 2021; 43:e1-e7. [PMID: 33252369 DOI: 10.1097/jhq.0000000000000286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Lawmakers suggest Certificate of Need (CON) laws' main goals are increasing access to healthcare, increasing quality of healthcare, and decreasing healthcare costs. This retrospective database study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of CON through analysis of total knee, hip, and shoulder arthroplasty (TKA, THA, and TSA, respectively). A review was performed using the Humana Insurance PearlDiver national database from 2007 to 2015. Access to care was approximated by the rates of total joint arthroplasty (TJA) in patients diagnosed with arthritis to the corresponding joint. The quality of care was assessed using complication rates after TJA. The total cost of TJA was approximated from average reimbursement to the healthcare facility per procedure. Patients in states without CON programs received TKA, THA, and TSA more frequently (p < .0001, p = .250, p = .019). No significant difference was found in studied complication rates between CON and non-CON states. Similarly, there was no trend found when comparing the cost of each procedure in CON versus non-CON states. These findings are consistent with other recent studies detailing the impact of CON regulation on THA and TKA. The apparent nonsuperiority of CON states in achieving their purported goals may call into question the effectiveness of additional bureaucracy and regulation, suggesting a need for further examination.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/economics
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/legislation & jurisprudence
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/statistics & numerical data
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/economics
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/legislation & jurisprudence
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/statistics & numerical data
- Certificate of Need/legislation & jurisprudence
- Female
- Health Care Costs/legislation & jurisprudence
- Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data
- Health Policy/legislation & jurisprudence
- Humans
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Retrospective Studies
- United States
Collapse
|
4
|
Yuce TK, Chung JW, Barnard C, Bilimoria KY. Association of State Certificate of Need Regulation With Procedural Volume, Market Share, and Outcomes Among Medicare Beneficiaries. JAMA 2020; 324:2058-2068. [PMID: 33231664 PMCID: PMC7686860 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.21115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Certificate of need laws provide state-level regulation of health system expenditure. These laws are intended to limit spending and control hospital expansion in order to prevent excess capacity and improve quality of care. Several states have recently introduced legislation to modify or repeal these regulations, as encouraged by executive order 13813, issued in October 2017 by the Trump administration. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the difference in markers of hospital activity and quality by state certificate of need status. These markers include hospital procedural volume, hospital market share, county-level procedures per 10 000 persons, and patient-level postoperative outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A cross-sectional study involving Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older who underwent 1 of the following 10 procedures from January 1, 2016, through November 30, 2018: total knee or hip arthroplasty, coronary artery bypass grafting, colectomy, ventral hernia repair, lower extremity vascular bypass, lung resection, pancreatic resection, cystectomy, or esophagectomy. EXPOSURES State certificate of need regulation status as determined by data from the National Conference of State Legislatures. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Outcomes of interest included hospital procedural volume; hospital market share (range, 0-1; reflecting 0%-100% of market share); county-level procedures per 10 000 persons; and patient-level postoperative 30-day mortality, surgical site infection, and readmission. RESULTS A total of 1 545 952 patients (58.0% women; median age 72 years; interquartile range, 68-77 years) at 3631 hospitals underwent 1 of the 10 operations. Of these patients, 468 236 (30.3%) underwent procedures in the 15 states without certificate of need regulations and 1 077 716 (69.7%) in the 35 states with certificate of need regulations. The total number of procedures ranged between 729 855 total knee arthroplasties (47.21%) and 4558 esophagectomies (0.29%). When comparing states without vs with certificate of need regulations, there were no significant differences in overall hospital procedural volume (median hospital procedure volume, 241 vs 272 operations per hospital for 3 years; absolute difference, 31; 95% CI, -27.64 to 89.64; P = .30). There were no statistically significant differences between states without vs with certificate of need regulations for median hospital market share (median, 28% vs 52%; absolute difference, 24%; 95% CI, -5% to 55%; P = .11); procedure rates per 10 000 Medicare-eligible population (median, 239.23 vs 205.41 operations per Medicare-eligible population in 3 years; absolute difference, 33.82; 95% CI, -84.08 to 16.43; P = .19); or 30-day mortality (1.17% vs 1.33%, odds ratio [OR], 1.04; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.16; P = .52), surgical site infection (1.24% vs 1.25%; OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.04; P = .21), or readmission rate (9.69% vs 8.40%; OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.12; P = .19). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among Medicare beneficiaries who underwent a range of surgical procedures from 2016 through 2018, there were no significant differences in markers of hospital volume or quality between states without vs with certificate of need laws. Policy makers should consider reevaluating whether the current approach to certificate of need regulation is achieving the intended objectives and whether those objectives should be updated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tarik K. Yuce
- Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Department of Surgery and Center for Healthcare Studies, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jeanette W. Chung
- Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Department of Surgery and Center for Healthcare Studies, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Cynthia Barnard
- Department of Quality Strategies, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Karl Y. Bilimoria
- Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Department of Surgery and Center for Healthcare Studies, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
- Department of Quality Strategies, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sridharan M, Malik AT, Phillips FM, Retchin S, Xu W, Yu E, Khan SN. Certificate-of-Need State Laws and Elective Posterior Lumbar Fusions: Is It Time to Repeal the Mandate? World Neurosurg 2020; 144:e495-e499. [PMID: 32891834 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.08.201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Revised: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 08/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Our study aimed to assess whether elective posterior lumbar fusions (PLFs) performed in states with Certificate-of-Need (CON) laws versus states without CON laws had lower utilization rates, lower costs, and better quality of care. METHODS The 2005-2014 100% Medicare Standard Analytical File was queried to identify patients undergoing elective 1- to 3-level PLF. Differences in per-capita utilization, 90-day reimbursements, and proportion of high-volume between CON and No-CON states were reported. Multivariate analyses were used to analyze 90-day complications and readmissions. RESULTS A total of 188,687 patients underwent an elective 1- to 3-level PLF in a CON state and 167,642 patients in a No-CON state during 2005-2014. The average per capita utilization of PLFs was lower in CON states as compared with No-CON states (14.5 vs. 15.4 per 10,000 population; P < 0.001). Average 90-day reimbursements between CON and No-CON states differed by a small amount ($22,115 vs. $21,802). CON states had a higher proportion of high-volume facilities (CON vs. No CON-40.9% vs. 29.9%; P < 0.05) and lower proportion of low-volume facilities (CON vs. No-CON-37.2% vs. 45.0%; P < 0.05). PLFs performed in CON states had slightly lower odds of 90-day complications (odds ratio 0.97 [95% confidence interval 0.96-0.99]; P < 0.001) and readmissions (odds ratio 0.95 [95% confidence interval 0.93-0.97]; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The presence of CON laws was associated with lower utilization of elective 1- to 3-level PLFs and a greater number of high-volume facilities. However, their effect on quality of care, via reduction of 90-day readmissions and 90-day complications, is minimally significant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathangi Sridharan
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Azeem Tariq Malik
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Frank M Phillips
- Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Sheldon Retchin
- Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA; College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Wendy Xu
- College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Elizabeth Yu
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Safdar N Khan
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) remain an effective treatment option for multiple pathologies of the cervical spine. As the health care economic climate has changed, so have reimbursements with a concomitant push toward outpatient procedures. Certificate of Need (CON) programs were established in response to burgeoning health care costs which require states to demonstrate need before expansion of medical facilities. The impact of this program on spine surgery is largely unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of CON status on reimbursement and utilization trends of ACDF in both inpatient and outpatient settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS We queried a combined private payer and Medicare database from 2007 to 2015. All single-level ACDFs were identified. We then split each procedure into those performed in CON versus non-CON states. We then further split each group into the inpatient and outpatient settings. Compound annual growth rate (CAGR) was used to compare utilization and reimbursement trends. Reimbursement was adjusted for inflation using the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics consumer price index. RESULTS A total of 32,727 single-level ACDFs were identified, of which 28,441 were performed in the inpatient setting, and 4286 were performed in the outpatient setting. Reimbursement decreased across all settings, with the most pronounced decrease in the non-CON outpatient setting with an adjusted CAGR of -11.0%. Utilization increased across all groups, although the fastest growth was seen in the outpatient CON setting with a CAGR of 47.7%, and the slowest growth seen in the inpatient non-CON setting at a CAGR of 12.9%. CONCLUSIONS ACDF utilization increased most rapidly in the outpatient setting, and CON status did not appear to hinder growth. Reimbursement decreased across all settings, with the outpatient setting in non-CON states most affected. Surgeons should be aware of these trends in the changing health care environment.
Collapse
|
7
|
Does certificate-of-need status impact lumbar microdecompression reimbursement and utilization? A retrospective database review. CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE 2019. [DOI: 10.1097/bco.0000000000000828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
8
|
Degen RM, Cancienne JM, Werner BC. Do certificate of need regulations impact total shoulder arthroplasty volumes and associated complication rates? PHYSICIAN SPORTSMED 2019; 47:357-363. [PMID: 30880532 DOI: 10.1080/00913847.2019.1592334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: Certificates of Need (CON) laws were introduced to improve resource utilization and reduce unnecessary health-care expansion. While many states have repealed their use, the debate continues as to their efficacy in achieving these goals. As such, we asked: 1) Are there differences in TSA incidence in CON/non-CON states? 2) Are there differences in procedural charges or reimbursement between CON/non-CON states? 3) Are there differences in the proportion of cases treated in high-, mid- or low-volume facilities between groups? 4) Are there differences in complications and length-of-stay (LOS) between high-volume and low-volume facilities? Methods: The 100% Medicare Standard Analytic files were queried for all TSA between 2005 and 2013, with minimum 1-year follow-up. Publically available data was used to identify states that upheld or repealed CON regulations, and comparisons were subsequently made between groups for normalized incidence of TSA per year and procedural charges and reimbursement rates. Comparisons were then made regarding the distribution of high-, mid- and low volume facilities, post-operative complication rates, and length-of-stay (LOS) between the different volume centers. Results: 167,288 patients undergoing TSA were identified. Normalized rates of TSA increased in both groups. Non-CON states had higher per-patient reimbursement, but paradoxically lower reimbursement rates compared with CON states. CON regulations lead to a greater proportion of procedures being performed in high-volume facilities compared with non-CON (p = 0.002). Finally, 30-day and 1-year complications, and length-of-stay, were significantly lower in high-volume facilities versus low-volume facilities (p ≤ 0.016). Conclusions: Where upheld, CON regulations contributed to a notable increase in the percentage of procedures performed in high-volume facilities, which in turn lead to a significant reduction in post-operative complications and LOS. Further study is necessary to definitely establish this relationship and the utility of CON regulations for the delivery of TSA care, particularly as it relates to clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan M Degen
- Sports Medicine and Shoulder, Hospital for Special Surgery , New York , NY , USA
| | - Jourdan M Cancienne
- Orthopedic Surgery, University of Virginia Health System , Charlottesville , VA , USA
| | - Brian C Werner
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia Health System , Charlottesville , VA , USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Casp AJ, Durig NE, Cancienne JM, Werner BC, Browne JA. Certificate-of-Need State Laws and Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34:401-407. [PMID: 30580894 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.11.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2018] [Revised: 11/25/2018] [Accepted: 11/27/2018] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many states have certificate-of-need (CON) programs requiring governmental approval to open or expand healthcare services, with the goal of limiting cost and coordinating utilization of healthcare resources. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the associations between these state-level CON regulations and total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS States were designated as CON or non-CON based on existing laws. The 100% Medicare Standard Analytic Files from 2005 to 2014 were used to compare THA procedure volumes, charges, reimbursements, and distribution of procedures based on facility volumes between the CON and non-CON states. Adverse postoperative outcomes were also analyzed. RESULTS The per capita incidence of THA was higher in non-CON states than CON states at each time period and overall (P < .0001). However, the rate of change in THA incidence over the time period was higher in CON states (1.0 per 10,000 per year) compared to non-CON states (0.68 per 10,000 per year) although not statistically significant. Length of stay was higher and a higher percentage of patients received care in high-volume hospitals in CON states (both P < .0001). No meaningful differences in postoperative complications were found. CONCLUSION CON laws did not appear to have limited the growth in incidence of THA nor improved quality of care or outcomes during the study time period. It does appear that CON laws are associated with increased concentration of THA procedures at higher volume facilities. Given the inherent potential confounding population and geographic factors, additional research is needed to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron J Casp
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Nicole E Durig
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Jourdan M Cancienne
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Brian C Werner
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - James A Browne
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Casp AJ, Browne JA, Durig NE, Werner BC. Complications After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34:36-39. [PMID: 30266323 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2018] [Revised: 08/23/2018] [Accepted: 08/29/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pigmented villonodular synovitis (PVNS) is a locally destructive histiocytic proliferation most commonly occurring in the knee. Extensive local joint destruction can indicate the need for a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The objective of this study is to evaluate PVNS of the knee as a risk factor for complication after TKA. METHODS Patients who underwent TKA with a diagnosis of PVNS of the knee from 2007 to 2016 were identified in a national private payer insurance database. Complication rates for emergency room visits, readmission, revision, stiffness, infection, and death were calculated and compared to a control population of patients who received TKA for osteoarthritis (OA). RESULTS Four hundred fifty-three patients were diagnosed with PVNS of the knee and underwent TKA during the time period and compared with a matched control cohort of 1812 patients who underwent TKA for OA. The rate of revision TKA at 2 years, emergency room visits, readmission, and death did not differ between the PVNS group and the control cohort. The PVNS group had stiffness at 1 year compared to the OA group (6.84% vs 4.69%, odds ratio 1.48, P = .023). The infection rate at 2 years was 3.31% in the PVNS group and 1.55% in the OA group (odds ratio 1.73, P = .011). CONCLUSION The complication rates for TKA in patients with a diagnosis of PVNS of the knee have not been previously demonstrated. These patients have a higher rate of stiffness and infection when compared to a control cohort, so they may have a more complicated postoperative course.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron J Casp
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - James A Browne
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Nicole E Durig
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Brian C Werner
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wu XD, Liu MM, Sun YY, Zhao ZH, Zhou Q, Kwong JSW, Xu W, Tian M, He Y, Huang W. Relationship between hospital or surgeon volume and outcomes in joint arthroplasty: protocol for a suite of systematic reviews and dose-response meta-analyses. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e022797. [PMID: 30552256 PMCID: PMC6303624 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2018] [Revised: 09/11/2018] [Accepted: 11/07/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Joint arthroplasty is a particularly complex orthopaedic surgical procedure performed on joints, including the hip, knee, shoulder, ankle, elbow, wrist and even digit joints. Increasing evidence from volume-outcomes research supports the finding that patients undergoing joint arthroplasty in high-volume hospitals or by high-volume surgeons achieve better outcomes, and minimum case load requirements have been established in some areas. However, the relationships between hospital/surgeon volume and outcomes in patients undergoing arthroplasty are not fully understood. Furthermore, whether elective arthroplasty should be restricted to high-volume hospitals or surgeons remains in dispute, and little is known regarding where the thresholds should be set for different types of joint arthroplasties. METHODS AND ANALYSES This is a protocol for a suite of systematic reviews and dose-response meta-analyses, which will be amended and updated in conjunction with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols. Electronic databases, including PubMed and Embase, will be searched for observational studies examining the relationship between the hospital or surgeon volume and clinical outcomes in adult patients undergoing primary or revision of joint arthroplasty. We will use records management software for study selection and a predefined standardised file for data extraction and management. Quality will be assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and the meta-analysis, subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis will be performed using Stata statistical software. Once the volume-outcome relationships are established, we will examine the potential non-linear relationships between hospital/surgeon volume and outcomes and detect whether thresholds or turning points exist. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval is not required, because these studies are based on aggregated published data. The results of this suite of systematic reviews and meta-analyses will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals for publication. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42017056639.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiang-Dong Wu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- Evidence-Based Perioperative Medicine 07 Collaboration Group, China
| | - Meng-Meng Liu
- Department of Pathology, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Ya-Ying Sun
- Department of Sports Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhi-Hu Zhao
- Department of orthopaedic, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Quan Zhou
- Department of Science and Education, First People’s Hospital of Changde City, Changde, China
| | - Joey S W Kwong
- Department of Health Policy, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Wei Xu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Mian Tian
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dianjiang People’s Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Yao He
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Banan People’s Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing, China
| | - Wei Huang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|