Does Prior Bariatric Surgery Affect Implant Survivorship and Complications Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty/Total Knee Arthroplasty?

Effect of bariatric surgery on postoperative outcomes of total hip arthroplasty: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Bariatric surgery may cause complications following total hip arthroplasty (THA); however, the evidence remains unclear. This review aims to evaluate the effects of bariatric surgery on THA complications. A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases was performed. The eligibility criteria were cohort studies comparing THA patients with and without prior bariatric surgery. The primary outcomes were complications, length of hospital stay, readmission rate, and cost. The study quality was assessed using the MINORS criteria. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4. Nine cohort studies (170,882 patients) met our inclusion criteria. Bariatric surgery was not associated with the risk of dislocation at 90 days (OR 1.50, 95%CI 0.83, 2.70). However, at one-year follow-up, the dislocation rate was significantly lower in the NBS group (OR 1.51, 95%CI 1.23, 1.86). Bariatric surgery reduced the risk of periprosthetic fracture risk (OR 0.56, 95%CI, 0.33 to 0.96) but had no effect on infection (RR 0.96, 95%CI 0.76 to 1.20), revision rates (OR 1.07, 95%CI 0.89 to 1.29), or survival (HR 2.41, 95%CI 0.78 to 7.42). Hospital stay was lower in the bariatric group (-0.16 days, 95%CI -0.23 to -0.09) as were 30-day readmissions (OR 0.17, 95%CI 0.07 to 0.40). The total costs showed no significant differences between the groups (MD 2323.06, 95%CI -3274.80 - 7920.93). Bariatric surgery may reduce the risk of periprosthetic fractures and decrease the length of hospital stay and 30-day readmission after THA. However, it did not significantly impact overall complications, including infection or revision rates.

Scientific Evidence for the Updated Guidelines on Indications for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (IFSO/ASMBS)

The 2022 American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) and International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) updated the indications for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (MBS), replacing the previous guidelines established by the NIH over 30 years ago. The evidence supporting these updated guidelines has been strengthened to assist metabolic and bariatric surgeons, nutritionists, and other members of multidisciplinary teams, as well as patients. This study aims to assess the level of evidence and the strength of recommendations compared to the previously published criteria.

Scientific evidence for the updated guidelines on indications for metabolic and bariatric surgery (IFSO/ASMBS)

The 2022 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) and International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) updated the indications for metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS), replacing the previous guidelines established by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) over 30 years ago. The evidence supporting these updated guidelines has been strengthened to assist metabolic and bariatric surgeons, nutritionists, and other members of multidisciplinary teams (MDTs), as well as patients. This study aims to assess the level of evidence and the strength of recommendations compared to the previously published criteria.

Sleeve gastrectomy prior to primary total hip and total knee arthroplasty is associated with increased risk of early complications

Aims

The purpose of this study was to determine the association between prior sleeve gastrectomy in patients undergoing primary total hip and knee arthroplasty, and 90-day complications, incidence of revision arthroplasty, and patient-reported outcome scores at final follow-up.

Methods

This is a retrospective, single-centre analysis. Patients undergoing primary hip or knee arthroplasty with a prior sleeve gastrectomy were eligible for inclusion (n = 80 patients). A morbidly obese control group was established from the same institutional registry using a 1:2 match, for cases:controls with arthroplasty based on propensity score using age, sex, pre-sleeve gastrectomy BMI, Current Procedural Terminology code to identify anatomical location, and presurgical haemoglobin A1C. Outcomes included 90-day complications, incidence of revision arthroplasty, and patient-reported outcome scores at final follow-up. Multivariable logistic regressions evaluated associations of underlying preoperative demographic and treatment characteristics with outcomes.

Results

Complications within 90 days of surgery were increased in the sleeve gastrectomy group relative to the obese control group after controlling for underlying preoperative demographic characteristics (odds ratio (OR) 4.00 (95% CI 1.14 to 13.9); p = 0.030). Postoperative revisions were similar in the sleeve gastrectomy group relative to the obese control group after controlling for underlying preoperative demographic characteristics (OR 17.8 (95% CI 0.64 to 494.3); p = 0.090). Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) depression decreased by a greater amount from pre- to postoperative in the obese controls relative to the sleeve gastrectomy group (OR 4.04 (95% CI 0.06 to 8.02); p = 0.047). PROMIS pain interference and physical function change from pre- to postoperative was not associated with sleeve gastrectomy status.

Conclusion

We found a higher rate of complications at 90 days in patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy prior to primary hip or knee arthroplasty relative to a matched, obese control population. Prosthetic revision rates were similar between the two groups, while improvements in PROMIS depression scores were larger in the obese cohort. This study suggests that sleeve gastrectomy to achieve preoperative weight loss prior to arthroplasty surgery may not mitigate early complication risks in obese patient populations.

Is Preoperative Weight Reduction in Patients Who Have Body Mass Index ≥ 40 Associated With Lower Complication Rates After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

Given the heightened risk of postoperative complications associated with obesity, delaying total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients who have a body mass index (BMI) > 40 to maximize preoperative weight loss has been advocated by professional societies and orthopaedic surgeons. While the benefits of this strategy are not well-understood, previous studies have suggested that a 5% reduction in weight or BMI may be associated with reduced complications after THA.

METHODS

We identified 613 patients who underwent primary THA in a single institution during a 7-year period and who had a BMI >40 recorded from 9 to 12 months prior to surgery. Subjects were stratified into 3 cohorts based on whether their baseline BMI decreased by >5% (147 patients, 24%), was unchanged ( ± 5%) (336 patients, 55%), or increased by >5% (130 patients, 21%) on the day of surgery. The frequency of 90-days Hip Society and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services complications was compared between these cohorts. There were significant baseline differences between the cohorts with respect to baseline American Society of Anesthesiologists class (P < .001) and hemoglobin A1C (P = .011), which were accounted for in a multivariate regression analysis.

RESULTS

In univariate analysis, there was a lower incidence of readmission (P = .025) and total complications (P = .005) in the increased BMI cohort. The overall complication rate was 18.4% in the decreased BMI cohort, 17.6% in the unchanged cohort, and 6.2% in the increased cohort. However, multivariable regression analysis controlling for potential confounders did not find that preoperative change in BMI was associated with differences in 90-days complications between cohorts (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who have a BMI >40 and achieved a clinically significant (>5%) BMI reduction prior to THA did not have a lower risk of 90-days complications or readmissions. Thus, delaying THA in these patients to encourage weight loss may result in restricting access to a beneficial surgery without an appreciable safety benefit.

Risk of revision total knee arthroplasty for patients with prior bariatric surgery or class III obesity

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery (BS) is indicated for select class III obesity patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to reduce obesity-related complications. This study assessed the effect of BS on TKA revision rates compared to the general population and class III obesity patients without a history of BS.

METHODS

A national database identified patients who had primary TKA. They were divided into two groups: those with BS prior to TKA and those without. Patients without BS formed two control groups, a matched general population, and a matched class III obese cohort. The BS group was matched with controls based on age, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), gender, and diabetes mellitus. Revision rates were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and hazard ratios (HR), calculated using Cox proportional hazard modeling.

RESULTS

14,292 BS patients were compared to 57,006 matched general population controls, and 19,504 BS patients were compared to 77,846 matched class III obesity control patients. BS patients had a higher risk of 5-year all-cause revision (HR: 1.13; P = 0.014) and revision due to periprosthetic fracture (HR: 1.39; P < 0.001) compared to the general population. Compared to class III obesity controls, BS patients had a lower risk of 5-year revision due to prosthetic joint infection (HR: 0.77; P = 0.001), with no difference in all-cause revision (P = 0.362).

CONCLUSION

BS does not reduce all-cause TKA revision risk compared to the general or matched class III obesity population. However, it lowers the risk of revision due to prosthetic joint infection when compared to patients with class III obesity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Is Morbid Obesity a Modifiable Risk Factor in Patients Who Have Severe Knee Osteoarthritis and do Not Have a Formal Perioperative Optimization Program?

BACKGROUND

Obesity is considered a modifiable risk factor prior to total knee arthroplasty (TKA); however, little data support this hypothesis. Our purpose was to evaluate patients who have a body mass index (BMI) >40 presenting for TKA to determine the incidence of: (1) patients who achieved successful weight loss through nutritional modification or bariatric surgery and (2) patients who underwent TKA over the study period without the presence of a formal optimization program.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-center analysis. Inclusion criteria included: Kellgren and Lawrence grade 3 or 4 knee osteoarthritis, BMI >40 at presentation, and minimum 1-year follow-up (mean 45 months) (N = 624 patients). Demographics, weight loss interventions, pursuit of TKA, maximum BMI change, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scores were collected. Multivariable logistic and linear regressions evaluated associations of underlying demographic and treatment characteristics with outcomes.

RESULTS

There were 11% of patients who ended up pursuing TKA over the study period. Bariatric surgery was 3.7 times more likely to decrease BMI by minimum 10 compared to nonsurgical intervention (95% confidence interval [CI] [1.7, 8.1]; P = .001). Bariatric surgery resulted in mean BMI change of -3.3 (range, 0 to 22) compared to nonsurgical interventions (-2.6 [range, 0 to 12]) and no intervention (0.4 [range, 0 to 15]; P < .0001). Bariatric surgery patients were 3.1 times more likely to undergo TKA (95% CI [1.3, 7.1]; P = .008), and nonsurgical interventions were 2.4 times more likely to undergo TKA (95% CI [1.3, 4.5]; P = .006) compared to no intervention. Non-White patients across all interventions were less likely to experience loss >5 BMI compared to White patients (95% CI [0.2, 0.9]; P = .018).

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients were unable to reduce BMI more than 5 to 10 over a mean 4-year period without a formal weight optimization program. Utilization of bariatric surgery was most successful compared to nonsurgical interventions, although ultimate pursuit of TKA remained low in all cohorts.

Medical Weight Optimization for Arthroplasty Patients: A Primer of Emerging Therapies for the Joint Arthroplasty Surgeon

The obesity epidemic in the United States continues to grow with more than 40% of individuals now classified as obese (body mass index >30). Obesity has been readily demonstrated to increase the risk of developing hip and knee osteoarthritis and is known to increase the risk of complications following joint arthroplasty. Weight loss prior to arthroplasty may mitigate this risk of complications; however, the existing evidence remains mixed with no clear consensus on the optimal method of weight loss and timing prior to arthroplasty. Treatment options for weight loss have included nonsurgical lifestyle modifications consisting of structured diet, physical activity, and behavioral modification, as well as bariatric and metabolic surgery (ie, sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and the adjustable gastric band). Recently, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists have gained notable popularity within the scientific literature and media for their efficacy in weight loss. The aim of this review is to provide a foundational primer for joint arthroplasty surgeons regarding the current and emerging options for weight loss to aid surgeons in shared decision-making with patients prior to arthroplasty.

Go Big or Go Home: Obesity and Total Joint Arthroplasty

Obesity is highly prevalent, and it is expected to grow considerably in the United States. The association between obesity and an increased risk of complications following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is widely accepted. Many believe that patients with body mass index (BMI) >40 have complications rates that may outweigh the benefits of surgery and should consider delaying it. However, the current literature on obesity and outcomes following TJA is observational, very heterogeneous, and full of confounding variables. BMI in isolation has several flaws and recent literature suggests shifting from an exclusively BMI <40 cutoff to considering 5 to 10% preoperative weight loss. BMI cutoffs to TJA may also restrict access to care to our most vulnerable, marginalized populations. Moreover, only roughly 20% of patients instructed to lose weight for surgery are successful and the practice of demanding mandatory weight loss needs to be reconsidered until convincing evidence exists that supports risk reduction as a result of preoperative weight loss. Obese patients can benefit greatly from this life-changing procedure. When addressing the potential difficulties and by optimizing preoperative assessment and intraoperative management, the surgery can be conducted safely. A multidisciplinary patient-centered approach with patient engagement, shared decision-making, and informed consent is recommended.

An Update on the Management and Optimization of the Patient with Morbid Obesity Undergoing Hip or Knee Arthroplasty

The prevalence of obesity in the United States is at a record high of 42%. In 1999, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recognized the obesity epidemic as a national problem, spurring the first generation of interventions for obesity prevention and control. Despite billions of dollars in funding, legislative changes, and public health initiatives, the trajectory of American obesity has not waivered. Obesity is also strongly associated with the development of osteoarthritis. The growing population of young, obese, and sick patients presents a unique dilemma for orthopedic surgeons performing joint replacement, as obesity levels and the demand for joint replacement are only expected to rise further.

Clinical Pathways of Patients Denied Total Knee Arthroplasty Due to an Institutional BMI Cutoff

Out of concern for the increased risk of complications with morbid obesity, institutional body mass index (BMI) cutoffs for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have become commonplace. We sought to answer the questions: what percentage of morbidly obese patients with knee osteoarthritis who present to an arthroplasty clinic will, within 2 years, undergo TKA at (1) a BMI less than 40 kg/m² or (2) at a BMI greater than 40 kg/m²? Of those who do not undergo surgery, (3) what percentage lose enough weight to become TKA-eligible, and (4) what percentage do not? We performed an observational study of 288 patients, of which 256 had complete follow-up. Institutional electronic medical record review and patient follow-up by telephone were conducted to determine which patients underwent surgery, and at what BMI. For those that did not undergo TKA, BMI was examined to see if the patient ever lost enough weight to become TKA eligible. Twelve of 256 patients (4.7%) underwent TKA at a BMI less than 40 kg/m², 64 patients (25%) underwent TKA at a BMI greater than 40 kg/m², and 7 patients (2.7%) underwent surgery at an outside hospital. The average BMI at the time of surgery was 42.3 kg/m². Thirty-seven of 256 patients (14.4%) lost enough weight to become TKA-eligible within 2 years of the initial visit but did not undergo surgery, while 136 patients (53.1%) neither underwent TKA nor became eligible. Strict enforcement of a BMI cutoff for TKA is variable among surgeons. In the absence of weight loss protocols, 19.1% of morbidly obese patients may be expected to reach the sub-40 kg/m² BMI milestone.

Does bariatric surgery really benefit patients before total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

At present, whether bariatric surgery before total knee arthroplasty (TKA) affects the prognosis of subsequent TKA has been a topic of debate in the academic community. The primary purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the effect of previous bariatric surgery on prosthetic revisions and postoperative complications after TKA.

METHODS

We included prospective and observational studies published in English involving patients who had undergone bariatric surgery prior to TKA and compared them with morbidly obese patients with no history of bariatric surgery. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the methodological quality of non-randomized case-control studies. The outcomes included revisions, infections, venous thromboembolism (VTE), blood transfusion, mortality, stiffness or manipulation under anesthesia (MUA), and medical complications.

RESULTS

Of the 9 included studies with 166047 patients, 4 were matched cohort studies, 2 were unmatched cohort, and 3 were database studies. Methodological quality was high in ten studies and moderate in thirteen studies. Our analysis demonstrated that patients with TKA who had undergone prior bariatric surgery were associated with increased risks of long-term revision, long-term infection, long-term stiffness or MUA and blood transfusions, whereas prior bariatric surgery did not increase the risk of short-term complications and short-term revision.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis highlights the risks of bariatric surgery prior to TKA and suggests that prior bariatric surgery may increase the risk of perioperative blood transfusion and also the risk of revision and infection in long-term follow-up. Surgeons can use this information to help counsel patients undergoing bariatric surgery before primary TKA.

Obesity, preoperative weight loss, and telemedicine before total joint arthroplasty: a review

The preoperative period prior to elective total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is a critical time for lifestyle interventions since a scheduled surgery may help motivate patients to lose weight. Weight loss may reduce complications associated with obesity following TJA and enable patients with severe obesity (body mass index [BMI] > 40 kg/m²) to become eligible for TJA, as many institutions use a 40 kg/m² cut-off for offering surgery. A comprehensive review was conducted to (1) provide background on complications associated with obesity following TJA, (2) synthesize prior research on the success rate of patients losing weight after being denied TJA for severe obesity, (3) discuss bariatric surgery before TJA, and (4) propose mobile health telemedicine weight loss interventions as potential weight loss methods for patients preoperatively. It is well established that obesity increases complications associated with TJA. In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), obesity increases operative time, length of stay, and hospitalization costs as well as the risk of deep infection, revision, and component malpositioning. Obesity may have an even larger impact on complications associated with total hip arthroplasty (THA), including wound complications and deep infection. Obesity also increases the risk of hip dislocation, aseptic loosening, and venous thromboembolism after THA. Synthesis of the only two studies (n = 417), to our knowledge, that followed patients denied TJA for severe obesity demonstrated that only 7% successfully reduced their BMI below 40 kg/m² via lifestyle modifications and ultimately underwent TJA. Unfortunately, bariatric surgery may only increase certain post-TKA complications including death, pneumonia, and implant failure, and there is limited research on preoperative weight loss via lifestyle modification. A review of short-term mobile health weight loss interventions that combined personalized counseling with self-monitoring via a smartphone app found about 5 kg of weight loss over 3-6 months. Patients with severe obesity have more weight to lose and may have additional motivation to do so before TJA, so weight loss results may differ by patient population. Research is needed to determine whether preoperative mobile health interventions can help patients become eligible for TJA and produce clinically significant weight loss sufficient to improve postoperative outcomes.

Preoperative Nonsurgical Weight Loss Interventions Before Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

An upcoming total joint arthroplasty (TJA) may motivate patients with severe obesity (body mass index [BMI] > 40 kg/m²) to lose weight. Weight loss can optimize outcomes following TJA, and many surgeons use a 40 kg/m² cut-off for undergoing TJA to reduce the risk of complications. However, few patients who are denied TJA for severe obesity successfully lose weight. This is the first systematic review of nonsurgical weight loss interventions before TJA.

METHODS

Five electronic databases were searched for articles on January 11, 2021. Studies that utilized preoperative nonsurgical weight loss interventions for patients with obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²) scheduled for or awaiting TJA of the hip or knee were included. Two reviewers independently screened articles, assessed methodological quality, and extracted data.

RESULTS

We retrieved 1943 unique records, of which 7 met inclusion criteria including 2 randomized clinical trials and 5 single-arm case series. Overall, weight loss ranged from 5.0 to 32.5 kg. Four interventions reduced BMI by 3 kg/m² at 3-5 months, while 1 reduced BMI by 12.7 kg/m². Other weight outcomes and those related to pain, function, complications, and adverse events were inconsistently reported.

CONCLUSION

Although larger trials are needed, particularly randomized controlled trials that measure preoperative weight loss in a control group, nutritional status, and postoperative complications, the available evidence indicates that short-term, nonsurgical, preoperative weight loss interventions before TJA produce both statistically significant weight loss and reduced BMI before surgery. It remains unknown if the amount of weight loss from these interventions is clinically significant and sufficient to improve outcomes after TJA.

Bariatric Surgery Before Elective Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) in Obese Patients Is Associated With Reduced Risk of 90-Day Postoperative Complications and Readmissions

STUDY DESIGN

This was a national database study.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the impact of prior bariatric surgery (BS) on altering 90-day postoperative outcomes following elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusions (ACDFs).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Though obesity has previously been shown to be linked with adverse outcomes following elective spine surgical procedures, the effectiveness of weight-loss strategies such as BS has not been explored.

METHODS

The PearlDiver program was used to query the 2007-2013 100% Medicare Standard Analytical Files (SAF100) for patients undergoing an elective ACDF. The study cohort was divided into 2 groups-(1) obese ACDF patients (body mass index ≥35 kg/m 2 ) receiving a BS procedure within 2 years before an ACDF and (2) obese ACDF patients (body mass index ≥35 kg/m 2 ) without a known history of a BS procedure within the last 2 years. Multivariate regression analyses were used to assess the impact of a BS procedure on postoperative outcomes following ACDF while adjusting for age, sex, region, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index.

RESULTS

A total of 411 ACDF patients underwent BS within the 2 years before an ACDF. Multivariate analysis showed that undergoing BS before an elective ACDF was associated with a significantly reduced risk of pulmonary complications [odds ratio (OR)=0.53; P =0.002], cardiac complications (OR=0.69; P =0.012), sepsis (OR=0.69; P =0.035), renal complications (OR=0.54; P =0.044), and 90-day readmissions (OR=0.53; P =0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery-induced weight loss before an ACDF in obese patients is associated with reduced 90-day complication and readmission rates. Orthopaedic and bariatric surgeons should counsel obese patients on the benefits of BS following ACDFs.

Predictors of Readmission and Prolonged Length of Stay After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to assess which factors increase risk of readmission within 30 days of surgery or prolonged length of stay (LOS) (≥2 days) after cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Several studies have shown noninferiority at mid- and long-term outcomes after cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) compared to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion ACDF, but few have evaluated short-term outcomes regarding risk of readmission or prolonged LOS after surgery.

METHODS

Demographics, comorbidities, operative details, postoperative complications, and perioperative outcomes were collected for patients undergoing single level CDA in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Patients with prolonged LOS, defined as >2 days, and readmission within 30 days following CDA were identified. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify risk factors for prolonged LOS and readmission.

RESULTS

A total of 3221 patients underwent single level CDA. Average age was 45.6 years (range 19-82) and 53% of patients were male. A total of 472 (14.7%) experienced a prolonged LOS and 36 (1.1%) patients were readmitted within 30 days following surgery. Predictors of readmission were postoperative superficial wound infection (odds ratio [OR] = 73.83, P < 0.001), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification (OR = 1.98, P = 0.048), and body mass index (BMI) (OR = 1.06, P = 0.02). Female sex (OR = 1.76, P < 0.001), diabetes (OR = 1.50, P = 0.024), postoperative wound dehiscence (OR = 13.11, P = 0.042), ASA class (OR = 1.43, P < 0.01), and operative time (OR = 1.01, P < 0.001) were significantly associated with prolonged LOS.

CONCLUSION

From a nationwide database analysis of 3221 patients, wound complications are predictors of both prolonged LOS and readmission. Patient comorbidities, including diabetes, higher ASA classification, female sex, and higher BMI also increased risk of prolonged LOS or readmission.Level of Evidence: 3.

Obesity, Bariatric Surgery, and Hip/Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes

Obesity is an independent risk factor for osteoarthritis due to mechanical and inflammatory factors. The gold-standard treatment of end-stage knee and hip osteoarthritis is total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Weight loss decreases progression of osteoarthritis and complications following TJA in patients with obesity. Bariatric surgery allows significant, sustained weight loss and comorbidity resolution in patients with morbid obesity. Existing data describing bariatric surgery on TJA outcomes are limited but suggest a benefit to bariatric surgery prior to TJA. Further studies are needed to determine optimal risk stratification, bariatric procedure selection, and timing of bariatric surgery relative to TJA.

Bariatric surgery prior to total knee arthroplasty is not associated with lower risk of revision: a register-based study of 441 patients

Background and purpose - Obesity is a considerable medical challenge in society. We investigated the risk of revision for any reasons and for infection in patients having total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for osteoarthritis (OA) within 2 years after bariatric surgery (BS) and compared them with TKAs without BS.Patients and methods - We used the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry (SOReg) and the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register (SKAR) to identify patients operated on in 2009-2019 with BS who had had primary TKA for OA within 2 years after the BS (BS group) and compared them with TKAs without prior BS (noBS group). We determined adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for the BS group and noBS group using Cox proportional hazard regression for revision due to any reasons and for infection. Adjustments were made for sex, age groups, and BMI categories preoperatively.Results - 441 patients were included in the BS group. The risk of revision for infection was higher for the BS group with HR 2.2 (95% CI 1.1-4.7) adjusting for BMI before the TKA, while the risk of revision for any reasons was not statistically significant different for the BS group with HR 1.3 (CI 0.9-2.1). Corresponding figures when adjusting for BMI before the BS were HR 0.9 (CI 0.4-2) and HR 1.2 (CI 0.7-2).Interpretation - Our findings did not indicate that BS prior to TKA was associated with lower risk of revision.

Is obesity associated with short-term revision after total knee arthroplasty? An analysis of 121,819 primary procedures from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of obesity is increasing. The association with knee osteoarthritis is well documented, resulting in the population requesting total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for invalidating symptoms to be heavier in nature. The purpose of the current analysis was to assess the association between preoperative body mass index (BMI) and short-term revision rate after TKA. The secondary aim was to investigate the influence of implant fixation method on the association between BMI and survivorship.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected registry data (Dutch Arthroplasty Register; LROI). All primary TKA procedures in patients >18 years of age with registered BMI were selected (n = 121,819). Non-obese patients (BMI 18-25) were compared with overweight (BMI 25-30) and class I-III obese (BMI >30, >35, >40) patients. Crude all-cause revision rates were calculated using competing risk analysis. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were determined with Cox multivariable regression analyses for all-cause, septic and aseptic revision and secondary patellar resurfacing.

RESULTS

Revision rates were 3.3% for non-obese patients, 3.5% for overweight patients, 3.7% for class I obese patients, 3.6% for class II obese patients and 3.7% for class III obese patients. Class III obese patients had a significant higher risk for septic revision compared with non-obese patients (HR 1.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-2.22). Class I obese patients had a higher risk for secondary patellar resurfacing (HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.12-2.08). All-cause and aseptic revision rates were similar between BMI groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Obesity appeared to be associated with some short-term revision risks after TKA, but was not associated with an overall increase in revision rate.

A Literature Review and Summary Recommendations of the Impact of Bariatric Surgery on Orthopedic Outcomes

Many surgeons recommend weight loss in preparation for orthopedic procedures, yet the impact of surgically induced weight loss before orthopedic procedures is not clear. We undertook a literature review to assess the impact of bariatric surgery on the outcomes of total joint arthroplasty (TJA). We searched PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar for studies (2010-2017) that evaluated the associations between obesity, bariatric surgery, and orthopedic surgery. Nine studies found that prior bariatric surgery decreased major and minor post-operative complications, operating room (OR) time, length of stay (LOS), risk of re-operation, and 90-day re-admissions after TJA. Two studies found that bariatric surgery patients had a higher reoperation rate for stiffness and infection as well as need for revision within 90 days after TJA. One meta-analysis found no statistically significant differences in wound infections, revisions, or mortality irrespective of bariatric surgery status; and another meta-analysis showed reduced medical complications, LOS, and OR time. Our review highlights many gaps in our knowledge and the need for additional studies to define the impact of the bariatric-first approach on TJA outcomes. We propose a framework from lessons learned to raise awareness of medical and surgical options of weight management before elective orthopedic operations in patients with obesity.

New developments and future challenges in prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of prosthetic joint infection

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication that results in substantial costs to society and patient morbidity. Advancements in our knowledge of this condition have focused on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment, in order to reduce rates of PJI and improve patient outcomes. Preventive measures such as optimization of patient comorbidities, and perioperative antibiotic usage are intensive areas of current clinical research to reduce the rate of PJI. Improved diagnostic tests such as synovial fluid (SF) α-defensin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and nucleic acid-based tests for serum, SF, and tissue cultures, have improved diagnostic accuracy and organism identification. Increasing the diversity of available antibiotic therapy, immunotherapy, and alternative implant coatings remain promising treatments to improve infection eradication in the setting of PJI.

Does Bariatric Surgery Normalize Risks After Total Knee Arthroplasty? Administrative Medicare Data

Patients with morbid obesity, defined as body mass index of greater than 40 kg/m², are being referred for weight loss and bariatric surgery before being accepted for a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Previous studies have identified the risks associated with doing a TKA in an individual with an increased body mass index. We now present data identifying the same risks in individuals who have undergone bariatric surgery before submitting to TKA.

The Effect of Bariatric Surgery Prior to Lower-Extremity Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Obesity is an independent risk factor for osteoarthritis and has been associated with increased rate of complications following lower-extremity total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Bariatric surgery (BS) is a surgical option for weight loss and for reducing obesity-related comorbidities in morbidly obese patients.

PURPOSE/QUESTIONS

The goal of this systematic review was to answer the following questions: (1) Does BS prior to TJA correlate with lower post-operative complication rates in morbidly obese patients undergoing TJA? (2) Does BS have an impact on revision rates following TJA?

METHODS

Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and checklist, a systematic review of medical databases (PubMed/ MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Clinicaltrials.gov) was undertaken for articles published in English from January 1990 to September 2018. Inclusion criteria were studies that included at least ten patients who underwent BS prior to TJA, collected data on complications or other outcomes, and followed patients for at least 90 days after TJA. A descriptive and critical analysis of the results was performed.

RESULTS

From 799 studies, 13 met inclusion criteria. A total of 11,770 patients who had undergone bariatric surgery prior to TJA were analyzed. The quality of the evidence ranged between moderate and high. There was no consensus on the effect of previous BS on early- to short-term outcomes reported after TJA.

CONCLUSION

The literature remains conflicted on the impact of BS prior to TJA on early, short-term, and long-term complications after TJA. Additional well-matched, observational studies may further our understanding of the impact of BS prior to TJA on outcomes. In particular the effect of various types of BS prior to TJA on outcomes has yet to be elucidated. Ideally, prospective studies with higher level of evidence will be more definitive on the effects of BS prior to TJA.Prospero Registration Number: CRD42016043025.

Does Prior Bariatric Surgery Improve Outcomes Following Total Joint Arthroplasty in the Morbidly Obese? A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

There remains a controversy regarding the risks in subsequent total joint arthroplasty (TJA) with and without previous bariatric surgery (BS). We performed a meta-analysis based on the current evidence-based study to determine the influences of prior BS on the short-term and long-term outcomes following TJA.

METHODS

From the inception to July 2018, the EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched for all relevant English language trials. The primary outcome measures were complications and revision, whereas the secondary outcomes included length of stay and operative time. Short-term follow-up was defined as that from hospital discharge to 90 days, and long-term follow-up was defined as more than 1 year.

RESULTS

A total of 9 studies with 38,728 patients were included. Overall, medical comorbidities were higher in the BS group compared with the control morbid obesity group before TJA. Our meta-analysis revealed that BS prior to TJA was associated with reduced short-term medical complications, length of stay, and operative time. However, BS did not reduce the short-term risks for superficial wound infection or venous thromboembolism, and the long-term risks for dislocation, periprosthetic infection, periprosthetic fracture, and revision. Subgroup analysis identified a significant reduction in the risk of short-term periprosthetic infection in the BS group after total knee arthroplasty, but not after total hip arthroplasty.

CONCLUSION

BS prior to TJA was associated with partially improved short-term outcomes after TJA. However, BS did not improve the risks for long-term outcomes. Limited by relatively higher comorbidities burden, the short-term benefits of BS should be further revealed by high-quality, controlled study in the future.