Bundled Payments for Care Improvement in the Private Sector: A Win for Everyone

The impact of social deprivation on healthcare utilization patterns following rotator cuff repair

BACKGROUND

Disparities in social determinants of health have been linked to worse patient reported outcomes, higher pain, and increased risk of revision surgery following rotator cuff repair. Identification of perioperative predictors of increased healthcare utilization is of particular interest to surgeons to improve outcomes and mitigate the total cost of care. The effect of social deprivation on healthcare utilization has not been fully characterized.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of a single institution's experience with primary rotator cuff repair between 2012 and 2020. Demographic variables (age, race, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score) and healthcare utilization (hospital readmission, emergency department visits, follow-up visits, telephone calls) were recorded within 90 days of surgery. The Area Deprivation Index (ADI) was recorded, and patients were separated into terciles according to their relative level of social deprivation. Outcomes were then stratified based on ADI tercile and compared.

RESULTS

A total of 1695 patients were included. The upper, middle, and lower terciles of ADI consisted of 410, 767, and 518 patients, respectively. The most deprived tercile had greater emergency department visitation and office visitation within 90 days of surgery relative to the least and intermediate deprived terciles. Higher levels of social deprivation were independent risk factors for increased emergency department (ED) visitation and follow-up visitation. There was no difference in 90-day readmission rates or telephone calls made between the least, intermediate, and most deprived patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with higher levels of deprivation demonstrated greater postoperative hospital utilization. We hope to use these results to identify risk factors for increased hospital use, guide clinical decision making, increase transparency, and manage patient outcomes following rotator cuff repair surgery.

Association of bundled payments with spending, utilization, and quality for surgical conditions: A scoping review

OBJECTIVES

To assess the body of literature examining episode-based bundled payment models effect on health care spending, utilization, and quality of care for surgical conditions.

BACKGROUND SUMMARY

Episode-based bundled payments were developed as a strategy to lower healthcare spending and improve coordination across phases of healthcare. Surgical conditions may be well-suited targets for bundled payments because they often have defined periods of care and widely variable healthcare spending. In bundled payment models, hospitals receive financial incentives to reduce spending on care provided to patients during a predefined clinical episode. Despite the recent proliferation of bundles for surgical conditions, a collective understanding of their effect is not yet clear.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted, and four databases were queried from inception through September 27, 2021, with search strings for bundled payments and surgery. All studies were screened independently by two authors for inclusion.

RESULTS

Our search strategy yielded a total of 879 unique articles of which 222 underwent a full-text review and 28 met final inclusion criteria. Of these studies, most (23 of 28) evaluated the impact of voluntary bundled payments in orthopedic surgery and found that bundled payments are associated with reduced spending on total care episodes, attributed primarily to decreases in post-acute care spending. Despite reduced spending, clinical outcomes (e.g., readmissions, complications, and mortality) were not worsened by participation. Evidence supporting the effects of bundled payments on cost and clinical outcomes in other non-orthopedic surgical conditions remains limited.

CONCLUSIONS

Present evaluations of bundled payments primarily focus on orthopedic conditions and demonstrate cost savings without compromising clinical outcomes. Evidence for the effect of bundles on other surgical conditions and implications for quality and access to care remain limited.

Skilled Nursing Facility Following Hip Fracture Arthroplasty Diminishes Care "Value"

BACKGROUND

Value is defined as outcome/cost. The purpose of this study was to analyze differences in the lengths of care, outcomes, and costs between skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) and home with health services (HHS) for patients treated with arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture (FNF).

METHODS

Between October 2018 and September 2020, 192 patients eligible for the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement bundle program treated for a displaced FNF with total hip arthroplasty (THA) or hemiarthroplasty (HA) and discharged to SNF or HHS were analyzed for demographics, comorbidities, postoperative outcomes, costs of care, and discharge rehabilitation details. Variables were compared using chi-squared or t-tests as appropriate. There were 60 (31%) patients discharged to HHS (37% THA and 63% HA) and 132 (69%) patients discharged to SNF (14% THA and 86% HA). Patients discharged to SNF were older (P < .01), had lower Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool scores (P < .01), had higher comorbidity scores (P = .011), and had longer posthospitalization care (P < .01).

RESULTS

There were no differences in rates of inpatient minor complications (P = .520), inpatient major complications (P = .119), Intensive Care Unit admissions (P = .193), or readmissions within 30 (P = .690) and 90 days (P = .176). Costs of care at a SNF were higher than HHS (P < .01). In multivariate regressions, a lower Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool score was associated with discharge to SNF (odds ratio 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.58-0.83, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Among Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement bundle patients treated for a displaced FNF with arthroplasty, discharge with HHS may be a more cost-effective option than discharge to a SNF that does not increase risk of readmission in medically appropriate patients.

Development of a Novel Prospective Model to Predict Unplanned 90-Day Readmissions After Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

For hospitals participating in bundled payment programs, unplanned readmissions after surgery are often termed "bundle busters." The aim of this study was to develop the framework for a prospective model to predict 90-day unplanned readmissions after elective primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) at a macroscopic hospital-based level.

METHODS

A national, all-payer, inpatient claims and cost accounting database was used. A mixed-effect logistic regression model measuring the association of unplanned 90-day readmissions with a number of patient-level and hospital-level characteristics was constructed.

RESULTS

Using 427,809 unique inpatient THA encounters, 77 significant risk factors across 5 domains (ie, comorbidities, demographics, surgical history, active medications, and intraoperative factors) were identified. The highest frequency domain was comorbidities (64/100) with malignancies (odds ratio [OR] 2.26), disorders of the respiratory system (OR 1.75), epilepsy (OR 1.5), and psychotic disorders (OR 1.5), being the most predictive. Other notable risk factors identified by the model were the use of opioid analgesics (OR 7.3), Medicaid coverage (OR 1.8), antidepressants (OR 1.6), and blood-related medications (OR 1.6). The model produced an area under the curve of 0.715.

CONCLUSION

We developed a novel model to predict unplanned 90-day readmissions after elective primary THA. Fifteen percent of the risk factors are potentially modifiable such as use of tranexamic acid, spinal anesthesia, and opioid medications. Given the complexity of the factors involved, hospital systems with vested interest should consider incorporating some of the findings from this study in the form of electronic medical records predictive analytics tools to offer clinicians with real-time actionable data.

National Trends in Post-Acute Care Costs Following Total Hip Arthroplasty from 2010 through 2018

BACKGROUND

Post-acute care remains a target for episode-of-care cost reduction following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The introduction of bundled payment models in the United States in 2013 aligned incentives among providers to reduce post-acute care resource utilization. Institution-level studies have shown increased rates of home discharge with substantial cost savings after adoption of bundled payment models; however, national data have yet to be reported. The purpose of this study was to evaluate national trends in post-acute care utilization and costs following primary THA over the last decade.

METHODS

We reviewed the cases of 189,847 patients undergoing primary THA during 2010 through 2018 from the PearlDiver database. Annual trends in patient demographics, discharge disposition, and post-acute care resource utilization were evaluated. Post-acute care reimbursements were standardized to 2020 dollars and included outpatient visits, prescriptions, physical therapy, home health, inpatient rehabilitation, skilled nursing facilities, and any rehospitalizations or emergency department (ED) visits within 90 days of surgery.

RESULTS

From 2010 to 2018, the mean episode-of-care costs ($31,562 versus $24,188; p < 0.001) and overall post-acute care costs ($5,903 versus $3,485; p < 0.001) both declined. Post-acute care savings were primarily driven by reduced costs of skilled nursing facilities ($1,533 versus $627; p < 0.001), home health ($1,041 versus $763; p = 0.002), inpatient rehabilitation ($949 versus $552; p < 0.001), ED visits ($508 versus $102; p < 0.001), and rehospitalizations ($367 versus $179; p < 0.001). Post-acute care costs declined by $578 (p = 0.025) during 2010 to 2012, $768 (p = 0.038) during 2013 to 2015, and $884 (p = 0.020) during 2016 to 2018.

CONCLUSIONS

Over the last decade, the rate of home discharge after THA increased while rehospitalization and ED visit rates declined, resulting in a substantial decrease in total and post-acute care costs. Post-acute care costs declined most rapidly after the introduction of the new Medicare bundled payment programs in 2013 and 2016.

Is There An Association Between Bundled Payments and "Cherry Picking" and "Lemon Dropping" in Orthopaedic Surgery? A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The goal of bundled payments-lump monetary sums designed to cover the full set of services needed to provide care for a condition or medical event-is to provide a reimbursement structure that incentivizes improved value for patients. There is concern that such a payment mechanism may lead to patient screening and denying or providing orthopaedic care to patients based on the number and severity of comorbid conditions present associated with complications after surgery. Currently, however, there is no clear consensus about whether such an association exists.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

In this systematic review, we asked: (1) Is the implementation of a bundled payment model associated with a change in the sociodemographic characteristics of patients undergoing an orthopaedic procedure? (2) Is the implementation of a bundled payment model associated with a change in the comorbidities and/or case-complexity characteristics of patients undergoing an orthopaedic procedure? (3) Is the implementation of a bundled payment model associated with a change in the recent use of healthcare resources characteristics of patients undergoing an orthopaedic procedure?

METHODS

This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO before data collection (CRD42020189416). Our systematic review included scientific manuscripts published in MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Econlit, Policyfile, and Google Scholar through March 2020. Of the 30 studies undergoing full-text review, 20 were excluded because they did not evaluate the outcome of interest (patient selection) (n = 8); were editorial, commentary, or review articles (n = 5); did not evaluate the appropriate intervention (introduction of a bundled payment program) (n = 4); or assessed the wrong patient population (not orthopaedic surgery patients) (n = 3). This led to 10 studies included in this systematic review. For each study, patient factors analyzed in the included studies were grouped into the following three categories: sociodemographics, comorbidities and/or case complexity, or recent use of healthcare resources characteristics. Next, each patient factor falling into one of these three categories was examined to evaluate for changes from before to after implementation of a bundled payment initiative. In most cases, studies utilized a difference-in-difference (DID) statistical technique to assess for changes. Determination of whether the bundled payment initiative required mandatory participation or not was also noted. Scientific quality using the Adapted Newcastle-Ottawa Scale had a median (range) score of 8 (7 to 8; highest possible score: 9), and the quality of the total body of evidence for each patient characteristic group was found to be low using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) tool. We could not assess the likelihood of publication using funnel plots because of the variation of patient factors analyzed in each study and the heterogeneity of data precluded a meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Of the nine included studies that reported on the sociodemographic characteristics of patients selected for care, seven showed no change with the implementation of bundled payments, and two demonstrated a difference. Most notably, the studies identified a decrease in the percentage of patients undergoing an orthopaedic operative intervention who were dual-eligible (range DID estimate -0.4% [95% CI -0.75% to -0.1%]; p < 0.05 to DID estimate -1.0% [95% CI -1.7% to -0.2%]; p = 0.01), which means they qualified for both Medicare and Medicaid insurance coverage. Of the 10 included studies that reported on comorbidities and case-complexity characteristics, six reported no change in such characteristics with the implementation of bundled payments, and four studies noted differences. Most notably, one study showed a decrease in the number of treated patients with disabilities (DID estimate -0.6% [95% CI -0.97% to -0.18%]; p < 0.05) compared with before bundled payment implementation, while another demonstrated a lower number of Elixhauser comorbidities for those treated as part of a bundled payment program (before: score of 0-1 in 63.6%, 2-3 in 27.9%, > 3 in 8.5% versus after: score of 0-1 in 50.1%, 2-3 in 38.7%, > 3 in 11.2%; p = 0.033). Of the three included studies that reported on the recent use of healthcare resources of patients, one study found no difference in the use of healthcare resources with the implementation of bundled payments, and two studies did find differences. Both studies found a decrease in patients undergoing operative management who recently received care at a skilled nursing facility (range DID estimate -0.50% [95% CI -1.0% to 0.0%]; p = 0.04 to DID estimate: -0.53% [95% CI -0.96% to -0.10%]; p = 0.01), while one of the studies also found a decrease in patients undergoing operative management who recently received care at an acute care hospital (DID estimate -0.8% [95% CI -1.6% to -0.1%]; p = 0.03) or as part of home healthcare (DID estimate -1.3% [95% CI -2.0% to -0.6%]; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In six of 10 studies in which differences in patient characteristics were detected among those undergoing operative orthopaedic intervention once a bundled payment program was initiated, the effect was found to be minimal (approximately 1% or less). However, our findings still suggest some level of adverse patient selection, potentially worsening health inequities when considered on a large scale. It is also possible that our findings reflect better care, whereby the financial incentives lead to fewer patients with a high risk of complications undergoing surgical intervention and vice versa for patients with a low risk of complications postoperatively. However, this is a fine line, and it may also be that patients with a high risk of complications postoperatively are not being offered surgery enough, while patients at low risk of complications postoperatively are being offered surgery too frequently. Evaluation of the longer-term effect of these preliminary bundled payment programs on patient selection is warranted to determine whether adverse patient selection changes over time as health systems and orthopaedic surgeons become accustomed to such reimbursement models.

New-Onset Depression After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Consideration of the At-Risk Patient

BACKGROUND

Postoperative new-onset depression (NOD) has gained recent attention as a previously unrecognized complication which may put patients at risk for poor outcomes after elective total hip arthroplasty. We aimed to investigate risk factors for the development of NOD after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and assess its association with postoperative complications.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, population-level investigation of elective TKA patients. Patients with a preoperative diagnosis of depression were excluded from this study. Two groups were compared: patients who were diagnosed with depression within one year after TKA (NOD) and those who did not (control). The association of both preoperative patient factors and postoperative surgical and medical complications with NOD was then determined using multivariate and univariate analyses.

RESULTS

Of 196,728 unique TKA patients in our cohort, 5351 (2.72%) were diagnosed with NOD within one year of TKA. Age <54 year old, female gender, preoperative anxiety disorder, drug, alcohol, and/or tobacco use, multiple comorbidities, and opioid use before TKA were all associated with a diagnosis of NOD postoperatively (all P < .001). Postoperative NOD was associated with periprosthetic fracture (OR 2.11; 95% CI 1.29-3.52; P = .033), aseptic failure (OR 1.61; 95% CI 1.24-2.07; P = .020), prosthetic joint infection (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.30-1.85; P < .001), stroke (OR 1.24; 95% CI 1.09-1.42; P = .006), and venous thromboembolism (OR 1.24; 95% CI 1.12-1.37; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Post-TKA NOD is common and is associated with poor outcomes. This may aid surgeons in developing both anticipatory measures and institute preventative measures for patients at risk for developing NOD.

Temporal Trends of Revision Etiologies in Total Knee Arthroplasty at a Single High-Volume Institution: An Epidemiological Analysis

Background

Temporal changes in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) may have implications in determining the etiology for implant failure. The purpose of this study was to 1) perform an epidemiologic analysis of etiologies that required rTKA and 2) determine whether temporal changes existed for revision over the study period.

Methods

All rTKA procedures performed at a single institution from 2009 to 2019 were analyzed. Revision procedures were stratified into 2 time periods, 2009-2013 and 2014-2019, to assess for changes over time. Patients' electronic medical record, operative report, and radiographs were reviewed to ensure diagnosis information was accurately documented in relation to the predominate etiology necessitating the revision procedure.

Results

Three thousand and nine patients undergoing rTKA between 2009 and 2019 were identified with a mean age of 64.6 years. A total of 1,666 (55.4%) patients were female, and the majority of patients were Caucasian (2,306, 76.6%). The 3 most frequent rTKA etiologies were aseptic loosening (35.1%), periprosthetic infection (33.2%), and instability (16.0%). A higher proportion of patients underwent rTKA for arthrofibrosis (5.1% vs 3.4%, P = .023) and periprosthetic joint infection (38.9% vs 28.6%, P < .001) between 2009 and 2013, while a significantly higher proportion of patients underwent rTKA for instability (12.6% vs 18.8%, P < .001) between 2014 and 2019.

Conclusion

Aseptic loosening was the most common cause for rTKA over the last decade. rTKA for arthrofibrosis and periprosthetic joint infection was more frequent between 2009 and 2013, while a significantly higher proportion of patients underwent rTKA for instability in 2014-2019. Future studies will need to focus on identifying and reducing risk factors for the trending causes of rTKA.

Health Care Resource Utilization in Commercially Insured Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Degenerative Cervical Pathology

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of an administrative database.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of our study was to investigate the distribution of spending for the entire episode of care among nonelderly, commercially insured patients undergoing elective, inpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgeries for degenerative cervical pathology.

METHODS

Using a private insurance claims database, we identified patients who underwent single-level, inpatient ACDF for degenerative spinal disease. Patients were selected using a combination of Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes. Entire episode of care was defined as 6-months before (preoperative) to 6 months after (postoperative) the surgical admission.

RESULTS

In our cohort containing 33 209 patients, perioperative median spending per patient (MSPP) within the year encompassing surgery totaled $37 020 (interquartile range [IQR] $28 363-$49 206), with preoperative, surgical admission, and postoperative spending accounting for 9.8%, 80.7%, and 9.5% of total spending, respectively. Preoperatively, MSPP was $3109 (IQR $1806-$5215), 48% of patients underwent physical therapy, and 31% underwent injections in the 6 months period prior to surgery. Postoperatively, MSPP was $1416 (IQR $398-$3962), and unplanned hospital readmission (6% incidence) accounted for 33% of the overall postoperative spending. Discharge to a nonhome discharge disposition was associated with higher postoperative spending ($14 216) compared with patients discharged home ($1468) and home with home care ($2903), P < .001.

CONCLUSION

Understanding the elements and distribution of perioperative spending for the episode of care in patients undergoing ACDF surgery for degenerative conditions is important for health care planning and resource allocation.

Higher complication rates after management of lower extremity fractures in lower socioeconomic classes: Are risk adjustment models necessary?

Introduction

Alternative payment models, such as bundled payments, have been proposed to control rising costs in orthopaedic trauma surgery. Without risk adjustment models, concerns exist about the financial burden incurred by so called “safety-net hospitals” that serve patients of lower socioeconomic status. The purpose of this study was to determine whether lower socioeconomic status was associated with increased complications and subsequently higher resource utilization following surgical treatment of high-energy lower extremity fractures.

Methods

The National Inpatient Sample database was queried for patients who underwent surgical fixation of the femur and tibia between 2005–2014. The top and bottom income quartiles were compared. Demographics, medical comorbidities, length of stay (LOS), complications, in-hospital mortality were compared between patients of top and bottom income quartiles. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was then performed to identify factors independently associated with complications, mortality, and increased resource utilization.

Results

Patients with femur fracture in the bottom income quartile had longer length of stay (6.9 days vs 6.5 days, p < 0.001) and a higher mortality rate (1.9% vs 1.7%, p = 0.034). Patients with tibia fracture in the bottom income quartile had greater complication rates (7.3% vs 6.1%, p < 0.001), longer length of stay (5.3 days vs. 4.5 days, p < 0.001), and higher mortality (0.3% vs. 0.2%, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Lower income status is associated with increased in-hospital mortality and longer length of stay in patients following lower extremity fractures. Risk adjustment models should consider the role of socioeconomic status in patient resource utilization to ensure continued access to orthopedic trauma care for all patients.

Ninety-Day Readmission in Elective Revision Lumbar Fusion Surgery in the Inpatient Setting

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

OBJECTIVES

(1) Identify the 90-day rate of readmission following revision lumbar fusion, (2) identify independent risk factors associated with increased rates of readmission within 90 days, (3) and identify the hospital costs associated with revision lumbar fusion and subsequent readmission within 90 days.

METHODS

Utilizing 2014 data from the Nationwide Readmissions Database, patients undergoing elective revision lumbar fusion were identified. With this sample, multivariate logistic regression was utilized to identify independent predictors of readmission within 90 days. An analysis of total hospital costs was also conducted.

RESULTS

In 2014, an estimated 14 378 patients underwent elective revision lumbar fusion. The readmission rate at 90 days was 3.1% (n = 446). Diabetes with chronic complications was the only comorbidity found to carry significantly increased odds of readmission. Surgical complications such as deep venous thrombosis, surgical wound disruption, hematoma, and pneumonia (experienced during the index admission) were also independent predictors of readmission. Anterior approaches were associated with increased odds of readmission. The most common related diagnoses on readmission were hardware issues, postoperative infection, and disc herniation. Readmissions were associated with an average of $96 152 in increased hospital costs per patient compared with those not readmitted.

CONCLUSION

Relevant patient comorbidities and surgical complications were associated with increased readmission within 90 days. Readmission within 90 days was associated with significant increases in hospital costs.

Where Will Pathologic Hip Fractures Go in a Value-based Hip Fracture Bundle?

INTRODUCTION

There has been a burgeoning interest for implementing bundled payments for hip fractures being treated with hemiarthroplasty, percutaneous pinning, and/or open reduction and internal fixation. Concerns exist about how hip fracture bundles may impede access to care for patients who require more resources, such as those with pathologic/neoplastic fractures.

METHODS

The 2011 to 2017 American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried to identify patients undergoing percutaneous pinning, hemiarthroplasty, plate/screw, and intramedullary nail for hip fractures. Multivariate regression analyses were used to identify notable differences in 30-day complications, readmissions, reoperations, mortality, length of stay, and nonhome discharges between native and pathologic/neoplastic hip fractures.

RESULTS

A total of 67,548 patients were included-of which 378 (0.6%) had a pathologic/neoplastic hip fracture. Pathologic fractures (versus native hip fractures) had significantly higher odds of experiencing a prolonged length of stay >5 days (odds ratio [OR] 1.57), pulmonary embolism (OR 3.67), deep vein thrombosis (OR 2.03), 30-day readmissions (OR 1.43), and 30-day mortality (OR 2.66).

DISCUSSION

Patients sustaining a pathologic/neoplastic hip fracture have a worse adverse event profile. Risk adjustment based on facture etiology will be necessary to ensure that providers taking care of pathologic/neoplastic fractures are appropriately reimbursed to minimize barriers to access of care for this vulnerable cohort.

Low Socioeconomic Status Is Associated With Increased Complication Rates: Are Risk Adjustment Models Necessary in Cervical Spine Surgery?

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to determine whether lower socioeconomic status was associated with increased resource utilization following anterior discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

METHODS

The National Inpatient Sample database was queried for patients who underwent a primary, 1- to 2-level ACDF between 2005 and 2014. Trauma, malignancy, infection, and revision surgery were excluded. The top and bottom income quartiles were compared. Demographics, medical comorbidities, length of stay, complications, and hospital cost were compared between patients of top and bottom income quartiles.

RESULTS

A total of 69 844 cases were included. The bottom income quartile had a similar mean hospital stay (2.04 vs 1.77 days, P = .412), more complications (2.45% vs 1.77%, P < .001), and a higher mortality rate (0.18% vs 0.11%, P = .016). Multivariate analysis revealed bottom income quartile was an independent risk factor for complications (odds ratio = 1.135, confidence interval = 1.02-1.26). Interestingly, the bottom income quartile experienced lower mean hospital costs ($17 041 vs $17 958, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Patients in the lowest income group experienced more complications even after adjusting for comorbidities. Therefore, risk adjustment models, including socioeconomic status, may be necessary to avoid potential problems with access to orthopedic spine care for this patient population.

Preoperative and Postoperative Spending Among Working-Age Adults Undergoing Posterior Spinal Fusion Surgery for Degenerative Disease

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the health care resource utilization and the associated 6 months preoperative and 6 months postoperative spending among patients undergoing posterior lumbar fusion.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a private insurance claims database for patients who underwent single-level posterior spinal fusion from January 2011 to December 2015. Outpatient health services, prescription pain medications, and inpatient admissions were assessed.

RESULTS

Among 25,401 patients (mean age, 52 years; 58% female) in the final cohort, median spending during the period from 6 months before surgery to 6 months after surgery was $60,714 (interquartile range [IQR], $46,961-$79,892)/patient. Preoperative spending accounted for 7% ($121 million) of the total costs, and postoperative spending accounted for 8% ($135 million). Median preoperative spending was $3566 (IQR, $2144-$5857) per patient, with imaging accounting for the highest proportion (33%) of preoperative spending. In the 6 months period preceding surgery, 46% patients received injections and 47% received physical therapy. The median postoperative spending was $1954/patient (IQR, $735-$4416). Total postoperative spending was significantly higher among those not discharged home (median, $7525; IQR, $6779-$19,602) compared with those discharged home (median, $1617/patient; IQR, $648-$4033) and home with home care services (median, $2921; IQR, $1406-$5662) (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Unplanned readmission after posterior spinal fusion was the highest contributor to postoperative spending and the second highest contributor to overall costs. Understanding factors that contribute to the costs in the preoperative and postoperative period in patients undergoing single-level posterior lumbar fusion for degenerative pathology is essential to identify targets for cost containment.

Modifying Patient Expectations Can Enhance Total Hip Arthroplasty Postoperative Satisfaction

BACKGROUND

A better understanding of patient expectations within the perioperative setting will enable clinicians to better tailor care to the needs of the total hip arthroplasty (THA) recipient. Such an approach will promote patient-centered decision-making and optimize recovery times while enhancing mandated hospital quality metrics. In the present study, we preoperatively and postoperatively surveyed THA candidates to elucidate the relationship between patient expectations and length of stay (LOS).

METHODS

This is a multi-institutional prospective study among THA candidates. Patients were surveyed regarding discharge planning 1 week preoperatively and postoperatively to capture perioperative patient expectations and correlate with inpatient LOS.

RESULTS

In total, 93 THAs performed by 6 high-volume orthopedic surgeons at 2 medical centers. Our results demonstrated that patients of male gender and commercial insurance had significantly (P < .05) shorter LOS. Shorter LOS patients demonstrated significantly higher levels of LOS acceptance ("very comfortable" rate in same-day discharge: 75.0% and next-day discharge: 63.8%; 2 days: 40.7%; 3+ days: 42.9%; P < .05) and a higher likelihood to participate in SDD programs. Postoperatively, patients with a shorter LOS had more acceptance to their LOS, albeit not statistically significant (P = .20).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that guiding patient expectations within the perioperative setting is an essential component for successful and timely discharge after THA. Having clear and transparent discussion with the surgical team regarding the perioperative course can improve a THA candidate's understanding and buy-in with the postoperative plan, regardless of LOS. Finally, inpatient LOS does not appear to affect patient satisfaction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective observational study.

‘Bundle busters’

Aims

The Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative has identified pathways for improving the value of care. However, patient-specific modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors may increase costs beyond the target payment. We sought to identify risk factors for exceeding our institution’s target payment, the so-called ‘bundle busters’.

Patients and Methods

Using our data warehouse and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) data we identified all 412 patients who underwent total joint arthroplasty and qualified for our institution’s BPCI model, between July 2015 and May 2017. Episodes where CMS payments exceeded the target payment were considered ‘busters’ (n = 123). Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated using a modified Poisson regression analysis.

Results

An increased risk of exceeding the target payment was significantly associated with increasing age (adjusted RR 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01 to 1.06) and body mass index (adjusted RR 1.03, 95% CI 1.003 to 1.06). Eight comorbid risk factors were also identified (all p < 0.05), only two of which were considered to be potentially modifiable (diabetes with complications and preoperative anaemia). An American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status classification system (ASA) score ≥ 3 (adjusted RR 2.3, 95% CI 1.67 to 3.18) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥ 3 (adjusted RR 1.94, 95% CI 1.45 to 2.60) were risk factors for bundle busting.

Conclusion

Non-modifiable preoperative risk factors can increase costs and exceed the target payment. Future bundled payment models should incorporate the stratification of risk. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B(7 Supple C):64–69

Incidence and Economic Burden of Intertrochanteric Fracture: A Medicare Claims Database Analysis

Background:

There is limited information on current cost estimates associated with intertrochanteric hip fractures in the United States. The purpose of the present study was to estimate the incidence and economic burden of both intertrochanteric and all hip fracture types in the Medicare patient population to the U.S. health-care system.

Methods:

This retrospective database analysis of the 2014 Medicare database involved Standard Analytic File (SAF) 5% sample claims and total enrollment files. Patients ≥65 years of age with a new principal diagnosis of hip fracture (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM] code 820.xy) who were continuously enrolled for 18 months were included; those with intertrochanteric hip fracture were further identified with use of ICD-9-CM code 820.21. The total direct medical costs associated with hip fracture in the 90-day and 12-month post-fracture periods were estimated. The relevant costs were estimated on the basis of a propensity-score-matched analysis. The health-care services responsible for major expenses within the 90-day episode-of-care period were also identified.

Results:

The total annual direct medical costs associated with all hip fractures was $50,508 per patient, resulting in a yearly estimate of $5.96 billion to the U.S. health-care system. Intertrochanteric hip fractures accounted for an annual estimate of $52,512 per patient, corresponding to an overall annual economic burden of $2.63 billion to the U.S. health-care system and representing 44% of all hip fracture costs. Inpatient hospitalization and skilled nursing facility services jointly accounted for 76.3% of the $44,135 estimated cost per patient and 75.6% of the $42,388 estimated cost per patient within the 90-day post-acute care period for intertrochanteric and all hip fractures, respectively.

Conclusions:

Hip fracture represents a substantial economic burden to the U.S. health-care system, accounting for $5.96 billion per year, with intertrochanteric hip fracture accounting for 44% of total costs.

Level of Evidence:

Economic and decision analysis, Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Clinical Relevance:

The present study provides a comprehensive and updated annual estimate of the economic burden of all hip fracture types and estimates the economic burden of intertrochanteric hip fractures in the Medicare population; to our knowledge, prior availability of this information in the literature is limited.