Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in a Safety Net Hospital: Substance Abuse and Other Factors Affecting Short-term Complications

Cemented vs. Cementless Fixation in Primary Knee Replacement: A Narrative Review

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the leading causes of disability around the globe. Osteoarthritis is mainly considered a disease affecting the elderly. However, more and more studies show that sports overuse, obesity, or congenital disorders can initiate a pathologic cascade that leads to OA changes in the younger population. Nevertheless, OA mostly affects the elderly, and with increasing life expectancy, the disease will develop in more and more individuals. To date, the golden standard in the treatment of the end-stage of the disease is total joint replacement (TJR), which restores painless knee motion and function. One of the weakest elements in TJR is its bonding with the bone, which can be achieved by bonding material, such as poly methyl-methacrylate (PMMA), or by cementless fixation supported by bone ingrowth onto the endoprosthesis surface. Each technique has its advantages; however, the most important factor is the revision rate and survivor time. In the past, numerous articles were published regarding TJR revision rate, but no consensus has been established yet. In this review, we focused on a comparison of cemented and cementless total knee replacement surgeries. We introduced PICO rules, including population, intervention, comparison and outcomes of TJR in a PubMed search. We identified 783 articles published between 2010 and 2023, out of which we included 14 in our review. Our review reveals that there is no universally prescribed approach to fixate knee prostheses. The determination of the most suitable method necessitates an individualized decision-making process involving the active participation and informed consent of each patient.

Rates and Outcomes of Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Persons Who Inject Drugs

BACKGROUND

The risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is higher in persons who inject drugs (PWID) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA), though reported rates vary widely. This study was designed to assess outcomes of TJA in PWID and to describe factors associated with improved PJI outcomes among PWID.

METHODS

A retrospective matched cohort study was performed using a 1:4 match among those with and those without a history of injection drug use (IDU) undergoing TJA. Demographic, surgical, and outcome variables were compared in multivariate logistic regressions to determine PJI predictors. Kaplan-Meier analyses were constructed to characterize the difference in survival of patients who did not have PJI or undergo joint explantation between PWID and the matching cohort.

RESULTS

PWID had a 9-fold increased risk of PJI compared to the matched cohort (odds ratio 9.605, 95% CI 2.781-33.175, P < .001). Ten of 17 PWID whose last use was within 6 months (active use) of primary TJA had a PJI, while 7 of 41 PWID who did not have active use developed a PJI. Of PWID with PJI, treatment failure was seen in 15 of 17, while in patients who did not have an IDU history, 5 of 8 with PJI had treatment failure.

CONCLUSION

IDU is a significant risk factor for PJI following TJA. Future work investigating the effect of a multidisciplinary support team to assist in cessation of IDU and to provide social support may improve outcomes and reduce morbidity in this vulnerable population.

Antiviral Treatment for Hepatitis C Is Associated With a Reduced Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

BACKGROUND

Recently, preoperative antiviral therapies for hepatitis C virus (HCV) have become available for total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients. The objective of this meta-analysis is to investigate the impact of anti-HCV treatment on the incidence of postoperative complications after primary TJAs.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for relevant studies from inception to March 5, 2022. The pooled odds ratios with 95% CI of the risk of postoperative complications were calculated using the random effects model. Subgroup analyses were conducted on the basis of surgery type, antiviral regimes, and duration of follow-up.

RESULTS

Eight retrospective cohort studies fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria, involving 9,703 subjects. Overall, antiviral therapy for HCV was associated with a reduced risk of all-type complications and surgical complications. Moreover, we found that HCV-infected patients without treatment had substantially higher rates of periprosthetic joint infection at any surgery type and follow-up time point. There was a tendency for favoring a lower pooled revision/reoperation rate and mechanical complication rate in treated patients compared with untreated patients, but the differences failed to reach statistical significance. When limiting analysis to patients receiving preoperative direct acting antiviral-based therapy, untreated patients still had a higher surgical complication rate and joint infection rate.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrated that antiviral therapy for HCV appears to be associated with a reduced risk of surgical complications in TJA patients, particularly periprosthetic joint infection. Thus, direct-acting antiviral therapy could be recommended for patients diagnosed with HCV.

Outcomes of revision arthroplasty for hip joint infection in matched groups of HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients

BACKGROUND

Several studies reported on periprosthetic infection after primary THA in HIV-positive patients, but very few showed the results of its revision.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to compare primary and secondary clinical outcomes after revision arthroplasty for hip joint infection in matched groups of HIV-infected and HIV-negative patients.

METHODS

Using the hospital database, thirteen HIV-positive patients (13 infected hips) and thirteen HIV-negative patients of the matched control group (13 infected hips) were identified and their records were studied retrospectively. They underwent revision surgery aimed at infection arrest and total hip replacement due to infection developed after primary THA or infected spacers. Harris Hip Score, reinfection rate, limb shortening, and definite outcomes were evaluated with Wilcoxon, Mann-Whitney, and Chi-squared tests.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Spacers with antibiotics were implanted in patients of both groups at the first step of revision, except one HIV-infected patient who had resection arthroplasty. The mean follow-up was 29.4±2.7 and 33.±2.9 months for the HIV-group and control group, respectively. Three patients of the HIV-group completed two-stage revision arthroplasty versus ten patients from the control group. Re-infection rate was higher in the HIV-group. At final follow-ups, the mean HHS was significantly different (53±3.2 points in the HIV-group versus 79.14±3.1 points in the control group) along with limb length discrepancy (3.71±0.43 versus 1.4±0.32).

CONCLUSION

Both primary and secondary clinical outcomes of revision arthroplasty for hip joint infection in HIV-positive patients were significantly worse than in the matched group of HIV-negative patients. Revisions in HIV-positive group resulted in a higher reinfection rate, a small number of definite two-stage revisions, and lower functional scores.

Hepatitis C virus infection increases the risk of adverse outcomes following joint arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of observational studies

BACKGROUND

Whether hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive patients are at risk for increased complications and long hospital stay following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) remains unclear. Therefore we performed a meta-analysis aiming to answer the following question: (1) are there differences in postoperative complications including joint infection and mortality between patients with or without hepatitis C following TJAs? (2) Are patients without HCV be associated with less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, lower readmission rate, higher function scores, lower revision and reoperation rates than patients with HCV?

METHODS

A meta-analysis was conducted to pool data and quantitatively assessing the association between HCV infection and risks for adverse postoperative outcomes. A systematic search of all published studies concerning HCV and TJA was performed in five bibliographic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases. Random-effects meta-analysis of odds ratios (OR) was accomplished according to the classification of adverse events, subgroup analyses were performed based on surgery type.

RESULTS

Fifteen eligible observational studies were included with a sample size of 9,788,166 patients. Overall pooled data revealed the increased risk of overall complications, including medical and surgical complications, in HCV-positive patients undergoing TJA compared with than in HCV-negative people (OR 1.57; 95%CI: 1.44-1.71 [p<0.00001]). Joint infections were highly common in HCV-positive patients undergoing lower-extremity TJA (OR 2.06; 95%CI: 1.73-2.47 [p<0.00001]). Furthermore, HCV infections were associated with high rates of reoperations and revisions (OR 1.47; 95%CI: 1.40-1.55 [p<0.00001]).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with hepatitis C have an increased risk of adverse outcomes post-TJA and a high risk of reoperation and revision that is partially attributed to postoperative complications, particularly joint infections.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; systematic review and meta-analysis.

Effect of Institution and COVID-19 on Access to Adult Arthroplasty Surgery

Background

Although insurance status is important to patients’ ability to access care, it varies significantly by race, age, and socioeconomic status. Novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) negatively impacted access to care, while simultaneously widening pre-existing health-care disparities. The purpose of the present study was to document this phenomena within orthopedics.

Methods

Patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty at two medical centers in San Francisco, California, were evaluated. One cohort came from the University of California San Francisco (UCSF), a tertiary center, and the other from Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital (ZSFGH), a safety-net hospital. Patients who underwent arthroplasty before the pandemic (March 2020) and those after pandemic declaration were evaluated. Patient demographics, surgical wait times, and operative volumes were compared.

Results

Two-hundred sixty-nine (pre-COVID, 184; post-COVID, 85) cases at UCSF and 63 (pre-COVID, 47; post-COVID, 16) cases at ZSFGH met inclusion criteria. Patients at ZSFGH had a significantly higher body mass index, were more often racial minorities, and were less likely to speak English. Patients at ZSFGH were less likely to have private insurance. A comparison of case volumes showed a larger decrease at ZSFGH than at UCSF after COVID. Wait times between the two sites before and after COVID showed a larger increase in wait times at ZSFGH. Notably, wait times at ZSFGH before COVID were more than double the wait times at UCSF after COVID.

Conclusions

COVID-19 worsened access to primary hip and knee arthroplasties at two academic medical centers in San Francisco. The pandemic also worsened pre-existing disparities. Racial minorities, non-English speakers, and those with nonprivate insurance were affected the most.

Psychological disorders confer poor functional outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Background

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is being used to treat a number of shoulder disorders. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the correlation between psychological disorders, drug and alcohol abuse, and postoperative complications and outcomes after RTSA.

Methods

A total of 128 patients who underwent an RTSA between January 2010 and February 2017 were identified. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, SST, ROM, complications, radiographic outcomes and patient satisfaction were collected. Follow-up occurred at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively (average of 3.68 years). Statistical analysis evaluated the effects of multiple risk factors: psychological disorders, substance abuse, and preoperative diagnoses.

Results

Psychological disorder diagnosis correlated with statistically significant lower American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons function (P = .027) and Simple Shoulder Test (P = .029) scores compared with those without a psychological disorder. It also conferred poor functional outcomes based on external rotation (P = .012). Complications, especially major complications, were more prevalent in patients with psychological diagnoses than without. A history of substance abuse correlated with a lower external rotation (P = .025).

Conclusion

Both a preoperative psychological diagnosis and a history of substance abuse conferred worse objective and functional outcomes scores after RTSA.

Potential disease burden of patients with substance abuse undergoing major abdominal surgery: A propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Over 19 million Americans have a substance abuse disorder. The current study sought to characterize the relationship between substance abuse with in-hospital outcomes following major, elective abdominal surgery.

METHODS

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to identify patients who underwent major abdominal surgery between 2007 to 2014. Patients with preoperative substance abuse, including alcohol, opioids, and non-opioid drugs, were identified. Propensity score matching was used to examine the association of substance abuse with perioperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 301,659 patients, 7,925 patients (2.6%) had a history of substance abuse. Pancreatectomy was the surgical procedure with the highest proportion of patients with substance abuse history (n = 844, 4.7%). Compared with patients without a substance abuse history, patients with a substance abuse history were more likely to be younger (median age, 60 years [interquartile range (IQR) 52-69] vs 63 years [IQR 52-72]), male (n = 5,438, 67.5% vs n = 132,961, 54.7%), and be in the lowest income category (n = 2,062, 26% vs n = 64,345, 21.9%) (all P < .001). On propensity score matching, substance abuse was associated with increased odds ratio of experiencing a complication (odds ratio [OR] 1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.55-1.82), non-home discharge (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.76-2.16), extended length of stay (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.76-2.02), and higher expenditure (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.49-1.77). Stratified by the type of substance abuse, patients with history of alcohol (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.44-1.71) and drug abuse (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.14-1.39) were more likely to experience a complication, whereas only history of alcohol abuse was associated with higher odds ratio of in-hospital mortality (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.07-1.79) (all P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Up to 1 in 50 patients undergoing complex abdominal surgery had a substance abuse history. History of substance abuse was associated with an increased risk of adverse perioperative outcomes and higher healthcare expenditures.