Taper-Trunnion Interface Stress Varies Significantly With Head Size and Activity

The impact of femoral head size on the wear evolution at contacting surfaces of total hip prostheses: A finite element analysis

Total Hip Arthroplasty has been a revolutionary technique in restoring mobility to patients with damaged hip joints. The introduction of modular components of the hip prosthesis allowed for bespoke solutions based on the requirements of the patient. The femoral stem is designed with a conical trunnion to allow for assembly of different femoral head sizes based on surgical requirements. The femoral head diameters for a metal-on-polyethylene hip prosthesis have typically ranged between 22 mm and 36 mm and are typically manufactured using Cobalt-Chromium alloy. A smaller femoral head diameter is associated with lower wear of the polyethylene, however, there is a higher risk of dislocation. In this study, a finite element model of a standard commercial hip arthroplasty prosthesis was modelled with femoral head diameters ranging from 22 mm to 36 mm to investigate the wear evolution and material loss at both contacting surfaces (acetabular cup and femoral stem trunnion). The finite element model, coupled with a validated in-house wear algorithm modelled a human walking for 10 million steps. The results have shown that as the femoral head size increased, the amount of wear on all contacting surfaces increased. As the femoral head diameter increased from 22 mm to 36 mm, the highly cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) volumetric wear increased by 61% from 98.6 mm3 to 159.5 mm3 while the femoral head taper surface volumetric wear increased by 21% from 4.18 mm3 to 4.95 mm3. This study has provided an insight into the amount of increased wear as the femoral head size increased which can highlight the life span of these prostheses in the human body.

The size of the femoral head does not influence metal ion levels after metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty: a five-year report from a randomized controlled trial

Aims

In metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) total hip arthroplasty (THA), large metal femoral heads have been used to increase stability and reduce the risk of dislocation. The increased size of the femoral head can, however, lead to increased taper corrosion, with the release of metal ions and adverse reactions. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the size of the femoral head and the levels of metal ions in the blood in these patients.

Methods

A total of 96 patients were enrolled at two centres and randomized to undergo MoP THA using either a 32 mm metal head or a femoral head of between 36 mm and 44 mm in size, being the largest possible to fit the thinnest available polyethylene insert. The levels of metal ions and patient-reported outcome measures (Oxford Hip Score, University of California, Los Angeles Activity Scale) were recorded at two and five years postoperatively.

Results

At five years, the median levels of chromium, cobalt, and titanium were 0.5 μg/l (interquartile range (IQR) 0.50 to 0.62), 0.24 μg/l (IQR 0.18 to 0.30), and 1.16 μg/l (IQR 1.0 to 1.68) for the 32 mm group, and 0.5 μg/l (IQR 0.5 to 0.54), 0.23 μg/l (IQR 0.17 to 0.39), and 1.30 μg/l (IQR 1 to 2.05) for the 36 mm to 44 mm group, with no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.825, p = 1.000, p = 0.558). There were increased levels of metal ions at two years postoperatively in seven patients in the 32 mm group, compared with four in the 36 mm to 44 mm group, and at five years postoperatively in six patients in the 32 mm group, compared with seven in the 36 mm to 44 mm group. There was no significant difference in either the OHS (p = 0.665) or UCLA (p = 0.831) scores between patients with or without an increased level of metal ions.

Conclusion

In patients who underwent MoP THA, we found no differences in the levels of metal ions five years postoperatively between those with a femoral head of 32 mm and those with a femoral head of between 36 mm and 44 mm, and no corrosion-related revisions. As taper corrosion can start after five years, there remains a need for longer-term studies investigating the relationship between the size of the femoral head size and corrosion in patients undergoing MoP THA.

Long-term survival analysis of cementless large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this retrospective study was to study the long-term survival and reasons for revisions of a single-type, large-diameter head (LDH) metal-on-metal (MoM) implant. A special study interest was to find the threshold level for revision in terms of adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this cohort study, we retrospectively reviewed 234 patients (253 hips) who received 38 mm head size LDH MoM total hip arthroplasties (THAs) between 01 January 2004 and 31 December 2009 at our institution. Patient symptoms, conventional radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and whole blood metal ions were studied.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 11.5 years. The Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival estimate of the implant was 89.6% at 10 years and 82.9% at 14.6 years. Overall, 34/253 (13.4%) hips were revised during the follow-up period and of these; 19/34 (55.9%) were revised due to ARMD. The prevalence of ARMD was 12.4% (29/234 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

The survival of the implant was on a moderate level as the 10-year cumulative survival rate was 89.6%. The exact threshold level for ARMD revision cannot be determined due to multiple variables affecting factors in re-operation decision-making.

The Progress in Tribocorrosion Research (2010-21): Focused on the Orthopedics and Dental Implants

Tribocorrosion is an integration of two areas-tribology and corrosion. It can be defined as the material degradation caused by the combined effect of corrosion and tribological process at the material interfaces. Significant development has occurred in the field of tribocorrosion over the past years. This development is due to its applications in various fields, such as aerospace, marine, biomedical, and space. Focusing on biomedical applications, tribocorrosion finds its applications in the implants used in cardiovascular, spine, orthopedics, trauma, and dental areas. It was reported that around 7.2 million Americans are living with joint implants. Implant surgery is a traumatic and expensive procedure. Tribocorrosion can affect the lifespan of the implants, thus leading to implant failure and a potential cause of revision surgery. Hence, it is essential to understand how tribocorrosion works, its interaction with the implants, and what procedures can be implemented to protect materials from tribocorrosion. This paper discusses how tribocorrosion research has evolved over the past 11 years (2010-2021). This is a comprehensive overview of tribocorrosion research in biomedical applications.

A Comparison of Revision Rates and Dislocation After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty with 28, 32, and 36-mm Femoral Heads and Different Cup Sizes: An Analysis of 188,591 Primary Total Hip Arthroplasties

This article was updated on August 17, 2022, because of previous errors, which were discovered after the preliminary version of the article was posted online. On page 1462, in the first sentence of the Abstract section entitled "Results," the phrase that had read "and 36-mm heads had fewer dislocations than 28-mm (HR = 0.33 [95% CI, 0.16 to 0.68]; p = 0.003), but more dislocations than 32-mm heads (HR for >2 weeks = 2.25 [95% CI, 1.13 to 4.49]; p = 0.021)" now reads "and 36-mm heads had fewer dislocations than 28-mm (HR = 0.33 [95% CI, 0.16 to 0.68]; p = 0.003) and 32-mm heads (HR for ≥2 weeks = 0.44 [95% CI, 0.22 to 0.88]; p = 0.021)." On page 1468, in the last sentence of the section entitled "Acetabular Components with a Diameter of <51 mm," the phrase that had read "and HR for ≥2 weeks = 2.25 [95% CI, 1.13 to 4.49; p = 0.021]) ( Fig. 3 )" now reads "and HR for ≥2 weeks = 0.44 [95% CI, 0.22 to 0.88; p = 0.021]) ( Fig. 3 )." Finally, on page 1466, in the upper right corner of Figure 3 , under "32mm vs 36mm," the second line that had read "2Wks+: HR=2.25 (1.13, 4.49), p=0.021" now reads "2Wks+: HR=0.44 (0.22, 0.88), p= 0.021."

[Contemporary indications for aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty]

BACKGROUND

Hip arthroplasties and revision procedures will continue to rise over the next decades. In 2020 in Germany, 75% of all revision surgeries involved an exchange of at least one component; exchanges of all components were carried out in 27.5% of the revisions. The most common failure modes were aseptic loosening, infections, periprosthetic fractures, instabilities, and metal-related pathologies.

INDICATIONS

Aseptic loosening remains the most common reason for revision. However, the indications for hip arthroplasty revisions have changed over time, with a decrease in revisions due to aseptic loosening and an increase in revisions due to infection and periprosthetic fracture. The rate of dislocations remained approximately constant over the past decade, with international differences. Metal-associated pathologies will continue to play a significant role in revision hip arthroplasty.

Horror of three synergistic factors in THA: high mechanical stress, dissimilar metals, low elasticity stem: a case report

Background

A large-diameter femoral head is effective in preventing dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. However, although rare, catastrophic stem tribocorrosion may occur at the head-stem junction.

Case presentation

A 70-year-old woman underwent revision surgery 7.5 years after total hip arthroplasty because of catastrophic stem corrosion with dissociation of the metal head (cobalt/chromium) and stem (TiMo12Zr6Fe2). Abnormal levels of cobalt were found in the intra-articular fluid, capsule, hip muscle, and blood. Revision surgery was performed via the direct anterior approach. The well-fixed femoral stem was explanted, and a cemented stainless stem with stainless head was implanted. Three months after the revision surgery, the cobalt concentration in the blood had decreased to normal.

Conclusions

Stem dissociation in the present case might have been caused by synergistic combination of a 36-mm-diameter femoral head and long neck length offset with high frictional torque, a cobalt-chromium head with a high risk of galvanic corrosion, and a TMZF (TiMo12Zr6Fe2) alloy stem with a low Young’s modulus of elasticity. The combination of these factors must be avoided.

Experimental validation of the abrasive wear stage of the gross taper failure mechanism in total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Gross taper failure (GTF) is a rare but catastrophic failure mode of the head-stem-taper junction of hip prostheses, facilitated by massive material loss. GTF is a two stage process initiated by corrosion leading to head bottoming out, followed by abrasive wear due to the head rotating on the stem. The purpose of this study was to reproduce the clinical failure patterns and to determine the material loss during simulated gait.

METHODS

Six cobalt-chromium alloy heads (36 mm, 12/14 taper) with three different head lengths (short / medium / extra long) were combined with stem taper replicas made from titanium alloy sized to achieve bottoming out. A hip simulator was used to simulate gait loading after (ISO 14242-1 for 2 million cycles).

RESULTS

Wear patterns from in-vitro testing match the clinical failure patterns. Stem taper wear increased linearly with time (p< 0.001). After two million cycles the material loss of short / medium / extra long heads was (M+-STD) 1168±242 mg / 400±23 mg / 94±12 mg on the stem side and 46±36 mg / 46±24 mg / 70±8 mg on the head side. Stem taper wear decreased with increasing head length (p=0.01), whereas clinical failures are mostly seen for long and extra long heads.

Assessing Taper Geometry, Head Size, Head Material, and Their Interactions in Taper Fretting Corrosion of Retrieved Total Hip Arthroplasty Implants

BACKGROUND

Decreased fretting and corrosion damage at the taper interface of retrieved ceramic-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty (THA) implants has been consistently reported; however, resultant fretting corrosion as a function of femoral head size and taper geometry has not been definitively explained.

METHODS

Eight cohorts were defined from 157 retrieved THA implants based on femoral head composition (n = 95, zirconia-toughened alumina, ZTA vs n = 62, cobalt-chromium alloy, CoCr), head size (n = 56, 32mm vs n = 101, 36mm), and taper geometry (n = 84, 12/14 vs n = 73, V40). THA implants were evaluated and graded for taper fretting and corrosion. Data were statistically analyzed, including via a 2³ factorial modeling.

RESULTS

Factorial-based analysis indicated the significant factors related to both resultant (summed) fretting and corrosion damage were head material and taper geometry; head material-taper geometry interaction was also a significant factor in resultant corrosion damage. Lower rates of moderate-to-severe fretting and corrosion damage were exhibited on ZTA heads (ZTA = 13%, CoCr = 38%), smaller heads (32mm = 18%, 36mm = 26%), and 12/14 tapers (12/14 = 13%, V40 = 35%). ZTA+32mm heads demonstrated the lowest rates of moderate-to-severe fretting and corrosion damage (12/14 = 2%, V40 = 7%), whereas CoCr heads with V40 tapers demonstrated the greatest rates of moderate-to-severe damage (32mm = 47%, 36mm = 59%).

CONCLUSION

In this series, retrieved implants with ZTA, 32-mm heads paired with 12/14 tapers exhibited lower rates of moderate-to-severe damage. Factorial analysis showed head material, taper geometry, and their interactions were the most significant factors associated with resultant damage grades. Isolating implant features may provide additional information regarding factors leading to fretting and corrosion damage in THA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV (case series).

The mechanics of head-neck taper junctions: What do we know from finite element analysis?

Modular hip implants are widely used in hip arthroplasty because of the advantages they can offer such as flexibility in material combinations and geometrical adjustments. The mechanical environment of the modular junction in the body is quite challenging due to the complex and varying off-axial mechanical loads of physical activities applied to a tapered interface of two contacting materials (head and neck) assembled by an impact force intraoperatively. Experimental analogies to the in-vivo condition of the taper junction are complex, expensive and time-consuming to implement; hence, computational simulations have been a preferred approach taken by researchers for studying the mechanics of these modular junctions that can help us understand their failure mechanisms and improve their design and longevity after implantation. This paper provides a clearer insight into the mechanics of the head-neck taper junction through a careful review on the finite element studies of the junction and their findings. The effects of various factors on the mechanical outputs namely: stresses, micromotions, and contact situations are reviewed and discussed. Also, the simulation methodology of the studies in the literature is compared. Research opportunities for future are scrutinised through tabulating data and information that have been carefully retrieved form the reported findings.

A review on the finite element simulation of fretting wear and corrosion in the taper junction of hip replacement implants

Taperosis/trunnionosis is a scientific term for describing tribocorrosion (fretting corrosion) at the head-neck taper junction of hip implants where two contacting surfaces are undergone oscillatory micromotions while being exposed to the body fluid. Detached ions and emitted debris, as a result of taperosis, migrate to the surrounding tissues and can cause inflammation, infection, and aseptic loosening with an ultimate possibility of implant failure. Improving the tribocorrosion performance of the head-neck junction in the light of minimising the surface damage and debris requires a better understanding of taperosis. Given its complexity associated with both the mechanical and electrochemical aspects, computational methods such as the finite element method have been recently employed for analysing fretting wear and corrosion in the taper junction. To date, there have been more efforts on the fretting wear simulation when compared with corrosion. This is because of the mechanical nature of fretting wear which is probably more straightforward for modelling. However, as a recent research advancement, corrosion has been a focus to be implemented in the finite element modelling of taper junctions. This paper aims to review finite element studies related to taperosis in the head-neck junction to provide a detailed understanding of the design parameters and their role in this failure mechanism. It also reviews and discusses the methodologies developed for simulating this complex process in the taper junction along with the simplifications, assumptions and findings reported in these studies. The current needs and future research opportunities and directions in this field are then identified and presented.

Modular dual-mobility cups using ceramic liners: an original solution for selected indications?

BACKGROUND

Dual mobility (DM) has been shown to improve stability both in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) and is increasingly used in patients at high risk of dislocation and in the treatment of THA instability. The introduction of modular liners has helped to overcome some of the limitations of monoblock DM cups. In this context, the use of a ceramic liner would avoid the conventional cobalt-chromium liner in the titanium shell, which can be problematic in some situations. The aim of this paper is to report the outcomes of a consecutive series of patients undergoing revision THA using a modular DM cup with a ceramic liner instead of the conventional metal one, and to clarify the rationale for this currently "off-label" use.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective series of patients who received this new DM bearing in a single institution. Patients were followed up clinically and radiologically at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and yearly thereafter.

RESULTS

5 patients received the ceramic liner in the study period (2014-2019). The indications were instability or high risk of dislocation in ceramic liner fracture and ARMD with soft tissue damage after MoM THA. The mean age at surgery was 74 (63-82) years, the mean follow-up was 36 (12-72) months. No dislocation occurred, and no adverse events related to the implant were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a ceramic liner in a modular DM cup offers several advantages in selected patients, and the results of our cohort are encouraging. However, caution is needed in introducing this new bearing because knowledge is currently limited. Further studies on a larger number of patients and with longer follow-ups are needed to confirm these findings and before widespread use of the device.

Taper corrosion: a complication of total hip arthroplasty

The focus on taper corrosion in modular hip arthroplasty increased around 2007 as a result of clinical problems with large-head metal-on-metal (MoM) bearings on standard stems. Corrosion problems with bi-modular primary hip stems focused attention on this issue even more.

Factors increasing the risk of taper corrosion were identified in laboratory and retrieval studies: stiffness of the stem neck, taper diameter and design, head diameter, offset, assembly force, head and stem material and loading.

The high variability of the occurrence of corrosion in the clinical application highlights its multi-factorial nature, identifying the implantation procedure and patient-related factors as important additional factors for taper corrosion.

Discontinuing the use of MoM has reduced the revisions due to metal-related pathologies dramatically from 49.7% (MoM > 32 mm), over 9.2% (MoM ⩽ 32 mm) to 0.8% (excluding all MoM).

Further reduction can be achieved by omitting less stiff Ti-alloys and large metal heads (36 mm and above) against polyethylene (PE).

Standardized taper assembly of smaller and ceramic heads will reduce the clinical occurrence of taper corrosion even further. If 36 mm heads are clinically indicated, only ceramic heads should be used.

Taper-related problems will not comprise a major clinical problem anymore if the mentioned factors are respected.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:776-784. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200013

Global diversity in bearings in primary THA

Choice of articulating materials, head size and the design of the articulation will become decisive for the long-term performance of a total hip arthroplasty (THA) and especially in terms of risk for dislocation and wear-related problems. Here we account for common alternatives based on available studies and the evidence that can be derived from them.Metal or ceramic femoral heads articulating against a liner or cup made of highly cross-linked polyethylene and ceramic-on-ceramic articulations have about similar risk for complications leading to revision, whereas the performance of metal-on-metal articulations, especially with use of big heads, is inferior. The clinical significance of problems related to ceramic-on-ceramic articulations such as squeaking remains unclear. With use of current technology ceramic fractures are rare.Large femoral heads have the potential to increase the range of hip movement before impingement occurs and are therefore expected to reduce dislocation rates. On the other hand, issues related to bearing wear, corrosion at the taper-trunnion junction and groin pain may arise with larger heads and jeopardize the longevity of THA. Based on current knowledge, 32-mm heads seem to be optimal for metal-on-polyethylene bearings. Patients with ceramic-on-ceramic bearings may benefit from even larger heads such as 36 or 40 mm, but so far there are no long-term reports that confirm the safety of bearings larger than 36 mm.Assessment of lipped liners is difficult because randomized studies are lacking, but retrospective clinical studies and registry data seem to indicate that this liner modification will reduce the rate of dislocation or revision due to dislocation without clear evidence of clinically obvious problems due to neck-liner impingement.The majority of studies support the view that constrained liners and dual mobility cups (DMC) will reduce the risk of revision due to dislocation both in primary and revision THA, the latter gaining increasing popularity in some countries. Both these devices suffer from implant-specific problems, which seem to be more common for the constrained liner designs. The majority of studies of these implants suffer from various methodological problems, not least selection bias, which calls for randomized studies preferably in a multi-centre setting to obtain sufficient power. In the 2020s, the orthopaedic profession should place more effort on such studies, as has already been achieved within other medical specialties, to improve the level of evidence in the choice of articulation when performing one of the most common in-hospital surgical procedures in Europe. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:763-775. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200002.

Gross Stem Taper Failure with Head Dissociation in a Very Active Patient with an Uncemented Femoral Stem

CASE

We report a case of gross taper failure (GTF) in a very active 81-year-old man 14 years after index operation. The patient presented with acute hip pain and shortening of the left leg. X-rays showed the dissociation of the head. The stem had to be revised because of the massive stem taper damage.

CONCLUSION

This case demonstrates that GTF at the head-stem taper junction following mechanically assisted crevice corrosion is not limited to a specific taper design and material. Other risk factors such as high activity level can lead to this failure pattern also in established stem and taper designs.

Femoral stem modularity

Femoral stem modularity in hip replacement was first developed to connect a ceramic head to the stem, then extended to metal heads using the Morse taper principle. Is it a good thing, or a necessary evil? It contributes to improving lower limb length and lateralization setting, at the cost of fairly rare complications such as dissociation and fretting corrosion, which can exceptionally lead to ARMD (Adverse Reaction to Metal Debris). Modular necks were later recommended, with a double Morse taper: cylindrical for the head junction, and more or less flattened for the stem. Is this one modularity too far? Dual modularity in theory perfectly reproduces the biomechanical parameters of the hip, but is unfortunately associated with fractures and severe corrosion, leading to ARMD and pseudotumor, especially in Cr-Co necks. Moreover, it provides no functional advantage, and no longer has a role outside dysplasia and other femoral deformities. Metaphyseal-diaphyseal modularity is not widespread in primary implants, and is it really necessary? Only one model has been widely studied: S-Rom™ (Depuy®). It features a metaphyseal sleeve adapting to the anatomy of the proximal femur, with a stem fitted via an inverse Morse taper. Its only interest is in case of congenital dislocation; like all metal connections, it incurs a risk of fracture and corrosion. On the other hand, modularity is widely employed in revision implants. Does it really help these procedures? The connection between a proximal femoral component of variable geometry and a diaphyseal stem with press-fit distal fixation provides a real solution to problems of length, lateralization and anteversion. Early models encountered high rates of fracture, but current implants and rigorous surgical technique have reduced this risk. Corrosion is a less serious problem, as the Morse taper undergoes only axial stress, without the friction undergone by other models subject to varus stress.