Osteoporosis Is Common and Undertreated Prior to Total Joint Arthroplasty

The effect of fixation type on periprosthetic fractures in high-risk patients who have osteoporosis undergoing total joint arthroplasty

Introduction

Minimizing the burden of periprosthetic fractures (PFF) following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) with regard to morbidity and mortality remains an outcome of interest. Patient and surgical risk factors, including osteoporosis and fixation type, have not truly been optimized in patients undergoing TJA as a means to reduce the risk of PFF. As such, we examined: (1) What percentage of patients who underwent THA and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) met the criteria for osteoporosis screening? (2) How did the 5-year rate of PFF and fragility fracture differ in the high-risk and low-risk groups for osteoporosis between the cemented and cementless cohorts? (3) What percentage of the aforementioned patients received a dual x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan before THA or TKA?

Methods

We queried an all-payer, national database from April 1, 2016 to December 31, 2021, to identify high-risk and low-risk patients who underwent TJA with a cementless or cemented fixation. High-risk patients met at least one of the following criteria: men at least 70 years old, women at least 65 years old, or patients at least 60 years old who have the following: tobacco use, alcohol abuse, body mass index <18.5, prior fragility fracture, chronic systemic corticosteroids, or genetic condition affecting sex hormones or bone mineral density. Exclusion criteria were a diagnosis of malignancy, high-energy events (motor vehicle collision), those who underwent TJA indicated for fracture, patients less than 50 years old, those who had a prior diagnosis of or treatment for osteoporosis, and a minimum follow-up of less than 2 years.

Results

There were 384,783 patients (67.1 %) who underwent cementless TKA and 67,774 patients (11.8 %) who underwent cementless TKA who were considered high risk. Additionally, there were 62,505 patients (10.9 %) who underwent cemented THA and 58,667 patients (10.2 %) who underwent cementless THA and were considered high risk. The cementless cohort had a 5-year periprosthetic fracture risk following TKA of 7.8 % (95 % CI, 5.56 to 10.98) in comparison to 4.30 % in the cemented cohort (85 % CI, 3.98 to 4.65), P < 0.0001. The high-risk cementless cohort had a 5-year periprosthetic fracture risk following THA of 7.9 % (95 % confidence interval (CI), 6.87 to 9.19) in comparison to 7.78 % in the cemented cohort (85 % CI, 6.77 to 8.94), P < 0.0001.

Conclusion

There is an increased risk of PFF at 5 years following TKA in patients at high risk for osteoporosis undergoing cementless fixation in comparison to cemented fixation. There is an increased risk of PFF at 5 years following THA in patients at high risk for osteoporosis for both cementless fixation and cemented fixation, but no clinically meaningful difference between the two groups. Addressing the shortcomings of the underutilization of bone density scans and better selecting appropriate patients for TJA based on bone quality and fracture risk can help expedite the process of improving the current state of practice.

Intraoperative physician assessment during total hip arthroplasty correlates with DXA parameters

PURPOSE

Orthopedic surgeons can assess bone status intraoperatively and recommend skeletal health evaluation for patients with poor bone quality. Intraoperative physician assessment (IPA) at the time of total knee arthroplasty correlates with preoperative DXA-measured bone mineral density (BMD). This study evaluated IPA during total hip arthroplasty (THA) as a quantitative measure of bone status based on tactile assessment.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis identified 60 patients (64 hips) undergoing primary THA who had IPA recorded in the operative report and a DXA within 2 years before surgery. Intraoperatively, two surgeons assessed bone quality on a 5-point scale (1 = excellent; 5 = poor). IPA score was compared to DXA BMD and T-score, 3D Shaper measurements, WHO classification, FRAX scores, radiographic Dorr classification, and cortical index.

RESULTS

There was a strong correlation between the IPA score and lowest T-score, WHO classification, and FRAX major and hip fracture scores (r =  ± 0.485-0.622, all p < 0.001). There was a moderate correlation between IPA score and total hip BMD and 3D Shaper measurements, including trabecular volumetric BMD, cortical surface BMD, and cortical thickness (r =  ± 0.326-0.386, all p < 0.01). All patients with below-average IPA scores had osteopenia or osteoporosis by DXA.

CONCLUSION

IPA during THA is a simple, valuable tool for quantifying bone status based on tactile feedback. This information can be used to identify patients with poor bone quality that may benefit from skeletal status evaluation and treatment and provide intraoperative guidance for implant selection. Orthopedic surgeons can assess bone health at the time of surgery. Intraoperative physician assessment (IPA) is a bone quality score based on surgeons' tactile assessment that correlates strongly with the lowest T-score, WHO classification, and FRAX fracture risk. IPA can guide surgical decision-making and future bone health treatment.

Chronic Oral Corticosteroid Use and 10-Year Incidence of Major Complications Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Oral corticosteroids are the primary treatment for several autoimmune conditions. The risk of long-term implant, bone health, and infectious-related complications in patients taking chronic oral corticosteroids before total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is unknown. We compared the 10-year cumulative incidence of revision, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), fragility fracture (FF), and periprosthetic fracture following TKA in patients who had and did not have preoperative chronic oral corticosteroid use.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using a national database. Primary TKA patients who had chronic preoperative oral corticosteroid use were identified using Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Disease 9 and 10 codes. Exclusion criteria included malignancy, osteoporosis treatment, trauma, and < 2-year follow-up. Primary outcomes were 10-year cumulative incidence and hazard ratios (HRs) of all-cause revision (ACR), aseptic revision, PJI, FF, and periprosthetic fracture. A Kaplan-Meier analysis and a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model were utilized. Overall, 611,596 patients were identified, and 5,217 (0.85%) were prescribed chronic corticosteroids. There were 10,000 control patients randomly sampled for analysis.

RESULTS

Corticosteroid patients had significantly higher 10-year HR of FF (HR; 95% confidence interval); P value (1.47; 1.34 to 1.62; P < .001)], ACR (1.21; 1.05 to 1.40; P = .009), and PJI (1.30; 1.01 to 1.69; P = .045) when compared to the control.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients prescribed preoperative chronic oral corticosteroids had higher risks of ACR, PJI, and FF within 10 years following TKA compared to patients not taking corticosteroids. This information can be used by surgeons during preoperative counseling to educate this high-risk patient population about their increased risk of postoperative complications.

Total knee arthroplasty and periprosthetic distal femoral fracture: looking beyond the osteoporosis to previous osteoporotic fracture

Osteoporosis increases the risk of periprosthetic distal femoral fractures after TKA, especially in patients with a history of osteoporotic fractures. Therefore, careful assessment and proper treatment of osteoporosis need and the importance of taking osteoporotic medication needs to be recognized by the patients following primary TKA.

PURPOSE

Osteoporosis is a risk factor for fractures, including those of the hip, vertebrae, and distal radius; however, the association between osteoporosis and periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has not been much investigated. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the association of the presence of systemic osteoporosis with periprosthetic fractures after TKA.

METHODS

This study included 34 patients with periprosthetic fractures following primary TKA and 106 controls matched for age and sex. Bone mineral density was evaluated at the femoral neck, total hip, and lumbar spine using dual X-ray absorptiometry. Medical records were reviewed for age; sex; body mass index; smoking; rheumatoid arthritis, endocrine diseases, and cardiovascular diseases; history of glucocorticoid use; medication for osteoporosis; and history of previous osteoporotic fracture. In addition, anterior femoral notching after TKA was evaluated. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to determine factors associated with periprosthetic fracture.

RESULTS

The prevalence of osteoporosis in the fracture group was higher than that in the control group (61.8% vs. 40.6%, p=0.045). The rate of medication for osteoporosis was significantly low in the fracture group (47.6 % vs 76.7%, p=0.026). History of previous osteoporotic fracture (odds ratio [OR], 9.1; p=0.015) and osteoporosis (OR, 3.6; p=0.013) were significant risk factors for periprosthetic fractures after TKA. Medication for osteoporosis could decrease the risk of periprosthetic fracture (OR 0.3; p=0.020).

CONCLUSION

Osteoporosis is a major risk factor for periprosthetic distal femoral fractures after TKA. Therefore, careful assessment and proper treatment of osteoporosis need and the importance of taking osteoporotic medication needs to be recognized to the patients following primary TKA, especially in patients with a history of osteoporotic fracture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic study, level III.

Patients with Periprosthetic Femoral Hip Fractures are Commonly Classified as Having Osteoporosis Based on DXA Measurements

Periprosthetic femoral hip fractures are subject to an increasing incidence and are often considered to be related to osteoporosis. However, there are no available studies that have determined the frequency of osteoporosis in affected patients using gold standard dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). In this retrospective comparative study, we analyzed the DXA results of 40 patients with periprosthetic femoral hip fractures who were treated surgically in our department. DXA measurements were performed at the total hip and the lumbar spine to determine bone mineral density T-scores. Data were compared to two age-, sex-, and BMI-matched control groups in which patients underwent DXA prior to aseptic revision surgery for other causes or primary THA (consisting of 40 patients each). The mean T-score in the periprosthetic fracture cohort was significantly lower (- 1.78 ± 1.78) than that of the aseptic revision (- 0.65 ± 1.58, mean difference - 1.13 [95% CI - 1.88 to - 0.37]; p = 0.001) and the primary THA cohort (- 0.77 ± 1.34, mean difference - 1.01 [95% CI - 1.77 to - 0.26]; p = 0.005). Accordingly, osteoporosis was detected more frequently (45%) in the fracture cohort compared to patients undergoing aseptic revision (12.5%) and primary THA (10%). In conclusion, almost half of the patients with periprosthetic femoral hip fractures have osteoporosis according to DXA measurements. A regular assessment of bone health in THA enables identification of patients with osteoporosis who likely benefit from initiation of osteoporosis medication and cemented stem fixation.

Osteoporosis should be evaluated by bone mineral density at the combination of the lumbar spine and ipsilateral femoral neck in female patients with knee osteoarthritis scheduled for knee arthroplasty: A retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Knee arthroplasty is a well-established surgery with good clinical outcomes. However, periprosthetic fractures and aseptic loosening negatively impact clinical outcomes, and osteoporosis is one of the causes of such complication. Osteoporosis is usually evaluated by bone mineral density of the lumbar spine and hip using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). However, the prevalence of this disease in patients with knee osteoarthritis scheduled for knee arthroplasty may be underestimated due to differences in the measurement sites. This study aimed to determine the appropriate measurement site for DXA that would not miss osteoporosis in female patients with knee osteoarthritis undergoing knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

We measured bone mineral density preoperatively in the consecutive 50 female patients with knee osteoarthritis scheduled for knee arthroplasty by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at five sites: the lumbar spine, bilateral-total hip, and femoral neck. We then compared the prevalence of osteoporosis among the four combinations of the lumbar spine and single hip site (ipsilateral or contralateral total hip or femoral neck).

RESULTS

Osteoporosis prevalence in the combination of the lumbar spine and ipsilateral or contralateral total hip was 32%, and that in the combination of the lumbar spine and contralateral femoral neck was 44%. Notably, the disease's prevalence in the combination of the lumbar spine and ipsilateral femoral neck was 50%, which was significantly higher than that in the other combinations.

CONCLUSION

Osteoporosis should be evaluated by bone mineral density in the combination of the lumbar spine and ipsilateral femoral neck in female patients with knee osteoarthritis scheduled for knee arthroplasty.

Assessing osteoporosis screening compliance in total joint surgery: a retrospective chart review

CONTEXT

Osteoporosis is a prevalent concern, particularly among aging populations, leading to increased risk of fractures, including those related to hip and knee arthroplasty procedures. Screening for osteoporosis, especially with dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans, is crucial for early detection and management.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess adherence to osteoporosis screening guidelines among patients aged 65 and older undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) within a single health network. Factors influencing screening adherence were also explored.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 2,160 patients undergoing elective THA or TKA between January 2019 and January 2023 was conducted. Demographic data, osteoporosis screening status, and occurrence of periprosthetic fractures were analyzed. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics and chi-square tests.

RESULTS

Only 24.1 % of eligible patients underwent a DXA scan prior to surgery. Females were more likely to undergo screening than males, and race was also associated with screening status. A total of 45 periprosthetic fractures were identified, with no significant correlation between osteoporosis status, DXA screening, and fracture occurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to osteoporosis screening guidelines among geriatric patients undergoing elective total joint arthroplasty remains low within the studied health network. Despite the lack of correlation between screening and fracture occurrence in this study, the importance of screening and potential optimization in high-risk patients is emphasized. Further research is needed to assess outcomes associated with different care pathways in bone health screening and management for elective geriatric total joint patients.

Patients with Osteoporosis Are at Higher Risk for Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures and Aseptic Loosening Following Total Hip Arthroplasty

This report provides an updated analysis for patients with osteoporosis following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The comorbidities of alcohol abuse, chronic kidney disease, cerebrovascular disease, obesity, and rheumatoid arthritis continue to be significant risk factors for periprosthetic femur fracture (PPFFx) and aseptic loosening in the population with osteoporosis. Patients with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometric (DEXA) scans were at risk for PPFFx regardless of femoral fixation method, and patients with DEXA scans with cementless fixation were at risk of aseptic loosening after THA. The patient population with severe osteoporosis may have higher risks for aseptic loosening and PPFFx than previously recognized.

Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty: Is it Safe in Demineralized Bone?

There is concern for cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients with decreased bone mineral density (BMD) due to the potential increase in complications, namely failed in-growth or future aseptic loosening. Some data suggest that advances in cementless prostheses mitigate these risks; however this is not yet born out in long-term registry data. It is crucial to expand our understanding of the prevalence and etiology of osteoporosis in TKA patients, survivorship of cementless implants in decreased BMD, role of bone-modifying agents, indications and technical considerations for cementless TKA in patients with decreased BMD. The purpose of this study is to review current literature and expert opinion on such topics.

Periprosthetic fractures are osteoporotic fractures: missed opportunities for osteoporosis diagnosis

Joint replacement surgery is common in older adults, leading to increasing periprosthetic fracture (PPFx) occurrence. We reviewed all PPFx seen over a 4-year period at an academic hospital. Clinical osteoporosis could be diagnosed based on existing data in 104 (67%) at the time of PPFx. Periprosthetic fractures are generally osteoporosis-related.

PURPOSE

Periprosthetic fractures (PPFx) cause morbidity, mortality, and cost. This study's purpose was to describe osteoporosis-related data available at the time of PPFx.

METHODS

The electronic medical record (EMR) of PPFx patients seen over 4 years in a university orthopedic practice were reviewed. Demographic data and osteoporosis relevant parameters were collected. Prior DXA studies were reviewed, and L1 Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements were performed on CT scans obtained within 2 years before PPFx. Clinical osteoporosis was defined as prior diagnosis, prescribed osteoporosis treatment, T-score ≤  - 2.5, HU ≤ 100, or prior fracture.

RESULTS

Records of 156 PPFx patients (115 F/41 M), mean (SD) age 75.4 (11.9), were reviewed. Almost all 153/156 (98%) of these fractures were femoral. Falls caused 139 (89%); 12 (8%) were spontaneous. Mean time post-arthroplasty was 7.9 (6.3) years. Prior fragility fracture(s) occurred in 72 (46%); 14 were PPFx. Osteoporosis was previously diagnosed in 45 (29%) and medications prescribed in 41 (26%). Prior to PPFx, DXA data were available in 62, mean (SD) lowest T-score was - 1.9 (0.9) and was ≤  - 2.5 in 19. CT data were available in 46; mean (SD) L1 HU was 79.0 (29.4) and was ≤ 100 in 35. Based on existing data, clinical osteoporosis could have been diagnosed in 104 (67%) at the time of PPFx.

CONCLUSION

Periprosthetic fractures are osteoporosis-related. They occur in older adults, often female, and result from falls; BMD, when assessed, is low. Data available at the time of PPFx often allows osteoporosis diagnosis; this should prompt evaluation and pharmacologic treatment consideration.

Systemic Osteoporosis and Osteopenia Among Periprosthetic Fractures After Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Most periprosthetic fractures following total hip arthroplasty (THA) are fragility fractures that qualify patients for osteoporosis diagnoses. However, it remains unknown how many patients were diagnosed who had osteoporosis before injury or received the proper evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment after injury.

METHODS

We identified 171 Vancouver B2 (109) and B3 (62) periprosthetic femur fractures treated with a modular fluted tapered stem from 2000 to 2018 at 1 institution. The mean patient age was 75 years (range, 35 to 94), 50% were women, and the mean body mass index was 29 (range, 17 to 60). We identified patients who had osteoporosis or osteopenia diagnoses, a fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX), bone mineral density (BMD) testing, an endocrinology consult, and osteoporosis medications. Age-appropriate BMD testing was defined as no later than 1 year after the recommended ages of 65 (women) or 70 years (men). The mean follow-up was 11 years (range, 4 to 21).

RESULTS

Falls from standing height caused 94% of fractures and thus, by definition, qualified as osteoporosis-defining events. The prevalence of osteoporosis diagnosis increased from 20% before periprosthetic fracture to 39% after (P < .001). The prevalence of osteopenia diagnosis increased from 13% before the fracture to 24% after (P < .001). The prevalence of either diagnosis increased from 24% before fracture to 44% after (P < .001). No patients had documented FRAX scores before fracture, and only 2% had scores after. The prevalence of BMD testing was 21% before fracture and 22% after (P = .88). By the end of the final follow-up, only 16% had received age-appropriate BMD testing. The proportion of patients who had endocrinology consults increased from 6% before the fracture to 25% after (P < .001). The proportion on bisphosphonate therapy was 19% before fracture and 25% after (P = .08).

CONCLUSIONS

Although most periprosthetic fractures following THA are fragility fractures that qualify patients for osteoporosis diagnoses, there remain major gaps in diagnosis, screening, endocrinology follow-up, and treatment. Like nonarthroplasty fragility fractures, a systematic approach is needed after periprosthetic fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Initiation of Bisphosphonates Prior to Total Joint Arthroplasty Does Not Lower Periprosthetic Fracture Risk

BACKGROUND

Many patients are diagnosed with osteoporosis shortly prior to scheduling total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The purpose of this study was to determine if initiation of bisphosphonates prior to TJA decreased the risks of periprosthetic fractures (PPFx).

METHODS

A national database was used to identify all patients diagnosed with osteoporosis prior to primary TJA. Patients who had osteoporosis without preoperative bisphosphonate use were designated as our control group. Patients on preoperative bisphosphonates were stratified based on duration and timing of bisphosphonate use: long-term preoperative users (initiation 3 to 5 years preoperatively), intermediate-term preoperative users (initiation 1 to 3 years preoperatively), and short-term preoperative users (initiation 0 to 1 year preoperatively). Rates of PPFx at 90-day and 2-year follow-up were compared between groups.

RESULTS

In patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty, there was no difference in PPFx rate between our control group and preoperative bisphosphonate users of all durations at 90-day (P = .12) and 2-year follow-up (P = .22). In patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty, there was no difference in PPFx rate between our control group and preoperative bisphosphonate users of all durations at 90-day (P = .76) and 2-year follow-up (P = .39).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing primary TJA, preoperative bisphosphonate users did not have a decreased PPFx rate compared to our control group at 90-day and 2-year follow-up. Our findings suggest that preoperative bisphosphonate use, regardless of the duration of treatment, does not confer protective benefits against PPFx in patients undergoing TJA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III.

Trend of using cementless total knee arthroplasty: a nationwide analysis from 2015 to 2021

BACKGROUND

Modern cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) fixation has shown comparable long-term outcomes to cemented TKA, but the trend of using cementless TKA remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the trend of using cementless TKA based on a national database.

METHODS

The patients undergoing cementless TKA between 2015 and 2021 were retrospectively extracted from the PearlDiver (Mariner dataset) Database. The annual percentage of cementless TKA was calculated using the following formula: annual number of cementless TKA/annual number of TKA. The trend of the number of patients undergoing cementless TKA was created according to a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) calculation of annual percentages. Patient age, comorbidity, region, insurance type, etc., were also investigated. Differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Of the 574,848 patients who received TKA, 546,731 (95%) underwent cemented fixation and 28,117 (5%) underwent cementless fixation. From 2015 to 2021, the use of cementless TKA significantly increased by 242% from 3 to 9% (compounded annual growth rate (CAGR): + 20%; P < 0.05). From 2015 to 2021, we observed a CAGR greater than 15% for all age groups (< 50, 50-59, 60-69, 70-74, 75 +), insurance types (cash, commercial, government, Medicare, Medicaid), regions (Midwest, Northeast, South, West), sex (male and female), and certain comorbidities (osteoporosis, diabetes mellitus, tobacco use, underweight (BMI < 18.5), rheumatoid arthritis) (P < 0.05 for all). Patients undergoing TKA with chronic kidney disease, prior fragility fractures, and dementia demonstrated a CAGR of + 9%-13% from 2015 to 2021 (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

From 2015 to 2021, the use of cementless TKA saw a dramatic increase in all patient populations. However, there is still no consensus on when to cement and in whom. Clinical practice guidelines are needed to ensure safe and effective use of cementless fixation.

Osteoporosis and Total Knee Arthroplasty: Higher 5-Year Implant-Related Complications

BACKGROUND

The risk of revision surgery in patients who have osteoporosis after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is understudied. Our aim was to compare the 5-year cumulative risk of revision surgery after TKA in patients who have preoperative osteoporosis.

METHODS

A national administrative claims database was queried for patients undergoing primary TKA from 2010 to 2021. There were 418,054 patients included, and 41,760 (10%) had osteoporosis. The 5-year incidence of revision surgery was examined for all-causes, periprosthetic fracture (PPF), aseptic loosening, and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). A multivariable analysis was conducted using Cox proportional hazards models. Hazards ratios (HRs) were reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

The 5-year rate of all-cause revision surgery was higher for patients who had osteoporosis (HR 1.1, 95% CI: 1.0 to 1.2), however, the highest risk of revision surgery was seen for PPF (HR 1.8, 95% CI: 1.6 to 2.1). Patients who had osteoporosis also had elevated risk of revision surgery for PJI (HR 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1 to 1.3) and aseptic loosening (HR 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1 to 1.3). Osteoporosis was independently associated with PJI and aseptic loosening at a higher rate in obese patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In unadjusted survival analysis, those who had osteoporosis have a marginally lower risk of all-cause revision surgery. However, after controlling for age, sex and comorbidities, patients who had osteoporosis have a nearly 2-fold increased risk of 5-year revision for PPF after TKA, and mildly increased risk of revision for all causes, aseptic loosening, and PJI. Obesity may also modulate this association. Future studies should determine the extent to which treatment of osteoporosis modifies these postoperative outcomes.

Osteoporosis and cement usage in total hip arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Cement usage in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is increasingly common. However, osteoporosis-related fracture risk in cemented vs uncemented THA patients is poorly characterized. We aim to analyze the usage of metabolic bone care and osteoporosis fracture risk in cemented vs uncemented THA patients using FRAX and radiographic bone measurements.

METHODS

Chart review on 250 THA patients was performed retrospectively. Demographics, FRAX scores, hip radiograph measurements, osteoporosis diagnosis, treatment and screening were compared between cemented and uncemented THA patients. Logistic regression model was used to analyze factors influencing cement usage.

RESULTS

Cemented THA patients have significantly higher osteoporosis-related fracture risk as measured by FRAX major (20% vs 13%) and FRAX hip (8% vs 5%). There is no significant difference in osteoporosis treatment, vitamin D / calcium supplementation, or metabolic bone disease screening based on patients' cement status. Female sex and rheumatoid arthritis status significantly predict cement usage, but FRAX scores do not predict cement usage. Additionally, 50% (10/20) of patients with Dorr C classification were uncemented.

CONCLUSION

Although some patients undergoing THA with high osteoporosis-related fracture risk were identified and cemented, some risk factors including poor proximal femur shape (by Dorr classification) and poor bone quality (as measured by FRAX score) were potentially overlooked. Cemented patients had an increased risk for fractures but did not receive appropriately increased osteoporosis screening or treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Areal bone mineral density is not associated with femoral stem subsidence in patients younger than 70 years undergoing total hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Femoral stem subsidence is a known complication after uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of osteoporosis and to investigate the relationship between areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and subsidence in a cohort of patients younger than 70 years.

METHODS

One hundred consecutive patients (age 60 ± 6 years; 52 female, 48 male) undergoing uncemented THA using a collarless press fit femoral stem were retrospectively reviewed. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was performed preoperatively at the proximal femur and lumbar spine, and if not feasible at these sites, at the distal radius. DXA results were compared to a cohort of 100 patients ≥ 70 years scheduled for cemented THA. Age, sex, and body mass index (BMI), canal flare index (CFI), and canal fill ratio (CFR) were assessed. Analysis of stem subsidence and migration was performed on standardized, calibrated radiographs obtained postoperatively and at follow-up.

RESULTS

The frequency of osteoporosis was considerably lower in the study cohort compared to patients ≥ 70 years (7% vs. 19%, p = 0.02). Illustrated by the high CFR (mean 96 ± 4%) in the mid-stem region, a sufficient press fit was achieved. After a mean follow-up of 7.4 months, the mean stem subsidence was 0.9 ± 0.9 mm. Only two patients had subsidence greater than 3 mm, one of whom was morbidly obese and the other diagnosed with severe osteoporosis. There were no correlations between any of the parameters (CFI, CFR, age, sex, BMI) and femoral stem subsidence. In addition, aBMD T-scores showed no correlations with subsidence.

CONCLUSION

aBMD by DXA does not appear to be associated with stem subsidence in patients younger than 70 years and with adequate press fit.

The Value of Computed Tomography Scan in Three-dimensional Planning and Intraoperative Navigation in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a frequently performed procedure; the objective is restoration of native hip biomechanics and achieving functional range of motion (ROM) through precise positioning of the prosthetic components. Advanced three-dimensional (3D) imaging and computed tomography (CT)-based navigation are valuable tools in both the preoperative planning and intraoperative execution. The aim of this study is to provide a thorough overview on the applications of CT scans in both the preoperative and intraoperative settings of primary THA. Preoperative planning using CT-based 3D imaging enables greater accuracy in prediction of implant sizes, leading to enhancement of surgical workflow with optimization of implant inventory. Surgeons can perform a more thorough assessment of posterior and anterior acetabular wall coverage, acetabular osteophytes, anatomical landmarks, and thus achieve more functional implant positioning. Intraoperative CT-based navigation can facilitate precise execution of the preoperative plan, to attain optimal positioning of the prosthetic components to avoid impingement. Medial reaming can be minimized preserving native bone stock, which can enable restoration of femoral, acetabular, and combined offsets. In addition, it is associated with greater accuracy in leg length adjustment, a critical factor in patients' postoperative satisfaction. Despite the higher costs and radiation exposure, which currently limits its widespread adoption, it offers many benefits, and the increasing interest in robotic surgery has facilitated its integration into routine practice. Conducting additional research on ultra-low-dose CT scans and examining the potential for translation of 3D imaging into improved clinical outcomes will be necessary to warrant its expanded application.

High rates of vitamin D insufficiency among patients presenting for total knee arthroplasty

Widely varying prevalence of vitamin D deficiency has been reported in patients presenting for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The primary aim of this study was to determine vitamin D levels in TKA patients and to compare to patients already routinely evaluated for vitamin D levels, patients with fragility fractures of the distal radius (DRF). There is significant overlap between patients presenting for TKA and with DRF, both in terms of medical comorbidities and overall health status, making these populations suitable comparative cohorts. Wefound that all patients presenting for TKA consultation had vitamin D insufficiency and 33% had vitamin D deficiency, compared to only 37% and 14% in the DRF cohort, a patient population routinely evaluated for vitamin D due to the high risk of deficiency. Furthermore, patients with DRF had higher levels of vitamin D before (38 ± 16 vs. 23 ± 5) and after vitamin D supplementation (39 ± 17 vs. 33 ± 10), suggesting that patients presenting for TKA are at even higher risk of vitamin D insufficiency than patients presenting with DRF. Reassuringly, supplementation successfully corrected 39.0% and 55.8% of patients in the DRF and TKA cohorts, respectively.

Bisphosphonate Use May be Associated With an Increased Risk of Periprosthetic Hip Fracture

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis is common among patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of bisphosphonate treatment on osteoporotic patients undergoing primary THA.

METHODS

Using a national database, 30,137 patients who had osteoporosis before primary elective THA were identified during 2010 to 2020. Patients undergoing nonelective THA and those using corticosteroids or other medications for osteoporosis were excluded. Bisphosphonate users and bisphosphonate naïve patients were matched 1:1 based on age, sex, Elixhauser comorbidity index, and a history of obesity, rheumatoid arthritis, tobacco use, and alcohol abuse. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate analyses were used to compare 2-year outcomes between groups.

RESULTS

Among matched cohorts of 9,844 patients undergoing primary THA, bisphosphonate use was associated with a significantly higher 2-year rate of periprosthetic fracture (odds ratio 1.29, 95% confidence interval 1.04 to 1.61, P = .022). There was a trend toward increased risk of any revision with bisphosphonate use (odds ratio 1.19, confidence interval 1.00 to 1.41, P = .056). Rates of infection, aseptic loosening, dislocation, and mortality were not statistically different between bisphosphonate users and bisphosphonate-naïve patients.

CONCLUSION

In osteoporotic patients, bisphosphonate use before primary THA is an independent risk factor for periprosthetic fracture. Additional longer-term data are needed to determine the underlying mechanism for this association and identify preventative measures.

Bone Mineral Density is Associated With Adverse Events but not Patient-Reported Outcomes in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Although osteoporosis is common in patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), its impact on postoperative outcomes has been inadequately studied. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of bone mineral density (BMD) on adverse events and patient-reported outcomes in THA and TKA.

METHODS

A series of 1,306 THA and 1,046 TKA patients who had received osteodensitometry were analyzed retrospectively. Rates of readmission, complication, transfusion, and patient-reported outcome were correlated with BMD. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the relationship between osteoporosis and adverse events.

RESULTS

Osteoporosis patients showed higher rates of 90-day readmission (THA: 8.5% versus 4.0%, P = .02; TKA: 8.9% versus 4.4%, P = .04) and transfusion (THA: 6.8% versus 1.2%, P < .001; TKA: 5.4% versus 1.5%, P = .005). After THA, rates of complications requiring intensive care management (5.1% versus 0.7%, P < .001) and rates of medical complications (3.5% versus 0.6%, P = .001) were increased. After TKA, rates of surgical complications (2.8% versus 0.8%, P = .04) were increased. Postoperatively, osteoporosis patients improved to comparable patient-reported outcomes as patients who had normal BMD. Multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed osteoporosis as an independent risk factor for readmissions, complications, and transfusions.

CONCLUSION

Osteoporosis is a risk factor for adverse events after THA and TKA. Affected patients show similar improvement of patient-reported outcome compared to patients who have normal BMD. As osteoporosis is modifiable, a systematic screening of patients scheduled for THA or TKA should be discussed.

Team Approach: Bone Health Optimization in Orthopaedic Surgery

» Bone health optimization (BHO) has become an increasingly important consideration in orthopaedic surgery because deterioration of bone tissue and low bone density are associated with poor outcomes after orthopaedic surgeries.» Management of patients with compromised bone health requires numerous healthcare professionals including orthopaedic surgeons, primary care physicians, nutritionists, and metabolic bone specialists in endocrinology, rheumatology, or obstetrics and gynecology. Therefore, achieving optimal bone health before orthopaedic surgery necessitates a collaborative and synchronized effort among healthcare professionals.» Patients with poor bone health are often asymptomatic and may present to the orthopaedic surgeon for reasons other than poor bone health. Therefore, it is imperative to recognize risk factors such as old age, female sex, and low body mass index, which predispose to decreased bone density.» Workup of suspected poor bone health entails bone density evaluation. For patients without dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan results within the past 2 years, perform DXA scan in all women aged 65 years and older, all men aged 70 years and older, and women younger than 65 years or men younger than 70 years with concurrent risk factors for poor bone health. All women and men presenting with a fracture secondary to low-energy trauma should receive DXA scan and bone health workup; for fractures secondary to high-energy trauma, perform DXA scan and further workup in women aged 65 years and older and men aged 70 years and older.» Failure to recognize and treat poor bone health can result in poor surgical outcomes including implant failure, periprosthetic infection, and nonunion after fracture fixation. However, collaborative healthcare teams can create personalized care plans involving nutritional supplements, antiresorptive or anabolic treatment, and weight-bearing exercise programs, resulting in BHO before surgery. Ultimately, this coordinated approach can enhance the success rate of surgical interventions, minimize complications, and improve patients' overall quality of life.

Association of osteoporosis and high serum homocysteine levels with intraoperative periprosthetic fracture during total hip arthroplasty: a propensity-score matching analysis

INTRODUCTION

Intraoperative periprosthetic fracture, one of the most frequent complications of total hip arthroplasty, is a very important factor that affects rehabilitation, hospitalization time, and cost of treatment. Osteoporosis is common in total hip arthroplasty patients and likely contributes to the increasing incidence of periprosthetic fracture. Despite this awareness, preoperative and postoperative osteoporosis evaluations remain insufficient. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationships between the occurrence of intraoperative periprosthetic fractures and both bone mineral density (BMD) and osteoporosis-related biomarkers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-center retrospective study included a total of consecutive 487 hip joints of patients with a mean age of 65.5 ± 11.8 years who underwent total hip arthroplasty between July 2017 and December 2020. Patients with low BMD defined as T-score < -1.0 versus those with normal BMD were matched by a 1:1 propensity score to balance for patient baseline characteristics, and outcome was analyzed by a modified Poisson regression model. Our primary outcome was the incidence of intraoperative periprosthetic fracture during surgery. We also investigated the effect modification of osteoporosis-related biomarkers, including tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRACP-5b), total procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide (total P1-NP), intact parathyroid hormone (intact PTH), and homocysteine, on osteoporosis and outcomes.

RESULTS

After matching, 250 patients were analyzed. The risk of fracture was significantly higher in patients with low BMD than in normal BMD patients (Incidence rate ratio 5.00 [95% CI 1.11-22.43], p = 0.036). We also observed significant effect of high serum homocysteine on the occurrence of intraoperative fractures (Incidence rate ratio 8.38 × 106 [95% C; 3.44 × 106-2.01 × 107], p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative osteoporosis and high serum homocysteine levels were risk factors for intraoperative periprosthetic fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, A single-center retrospective study.

Bone Health Management in Elective Orthopaedic Surgery: A Claims-Based Observational Study

Introduction

There are limited data on the management of bone health, including bone mineral density (BMD) evaluation and osteoporosis (OP) treatment, in patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgeries.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study using administrative claims data from Symphony Health, PatientSource for patients aged ≥50 years with documented kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty (KP/VP), total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and total hip arthroplasty (THA). Risk stratification to identify patients at very high risk for fracture (VHRFx) was based on clinical practice guideline recommendations to the extent information on variables of interest were available from the claims database.

Results

A total of 251 919 patients met inclusion criteria: KP/VP (31 018), TKA (149 849), and THA (71 052). The majority were female (80.3%) with a mean (SD) age of 68.5 (7.5) years. Patients undergoing KP/VP were older and had a greater comorbidity burden associated with risk for falls, mobility issues, muscle weakness, and respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. In the 6 months before surgery, 11.8% of patients were tested and/or received treatment for OP. Patients undergoing KP/VP were more likely to be tested and/or treated (17.5%) than patients undergoing TKA (11.0%) or THA (10.9%). Overall, men had a lower rate of testing and/or treatment than women (4.6% vs 13.5%). In the 12 months before surgery, patients with an OP diagnosis and at VHRFx (30.8%) had a higher rate of treatment and/or testing than those without OP (11.5%), or those without OP but with a fracture in the year preceding surgery (10.2%).

Conclusions

Bone health management is suboptimal in patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgeries and is worse in men than in women. Proper management of OP before and after surgery may improve outcomes.

The Effect of Preoperative Bisphosphonate Use on Total Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) commonly have osteoporosis for which bisphosphonates (BPs) are Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved for treatment. Bisphosphonate use post-THA is associated with decreased periprosthetic bone loss or revisions, and increased longevity of implants. However, evidence is lacking for preoperative bisphosphonate use in THA recipients. This study investigated the association between bisphosphonate use pre-THA and outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a national administrative claims database was conducted. Among THA recipients who had a prior diagnosis of hip osteoarthritis and osteoporosis/osteopenia, the treatment group (BP-exposed) consisted of patients who had a history of bisphosphonate use at least 1 year before THA; controls (BP-naive) comprised patients who did not have preoperative bisphosphonate use. The BP-exposed were matched to BP-naive in a 1:4 ratio by age, sex, and comorbidities. Logistic regressions were used to calculate the odds ratio for intraoperative and 1-year postoperative complications.

RESULTS

The BP-exposed group had significantly higher rates of intraoperative and 1-year postoperative periprosthetic fractures (odds ratio (OR): 1.39, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.23, 1.57) and revisions (OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.25) compared with the BP-naive controls. BP-exposed also experienced higher rates of aseptic loosening, dislocation, periprosthetic osteolysis, and stress fracture of the femur or hip/pelvis compared to the BP-naive controls, but these values were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The use of bisphosphonates in THA patients preoperatively is associated with higher rates of intraoperative and 1-year postoperative complications. These findings may impact the management of patients undergoing THA who have a prior diagnosis of osteoporosis/osteopenia and use of bisphosphonates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective Cohort Study (Level 3).

A call to "own the bone": osteoporosis is a predictor for adverse two-year outcomes following total hip and knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

While bone health is instrumental in orthopedic surgery, few studies have described the long-term outcomes of osteoporosis (OP) in patients undergoing total hip (THA) or knee (TKA) arthroplasties.

METHODS

Using the New York State statewide planning and research cooperative system database, all patients who underwent primary TKA or THA for osteoarthritis from 2009 to 2011 with minimum 2-year follow-up were identified. They were divided based on their OP status (OP and non-OP) and 1:1 propensity score matched for age, sex, race, and Charlson/Deyo index. Cohorts were compared for demographics, hospital-related parameters, and 2-year postoperative complications and reoperations. Multivariate binary logistic regression was utilized to identify significant independent associations with 2-year medical and surgical complications and revisions.

RESULTS

A total of 11,288 TKA and 8248 THA patients were identified. OP and non-OP TKA patients incurred comparable overall hospital charges for their surgical visit and hospital length of stay (LOS) (both, p ≥ 0.125). Though OP and non-OP THA patients incurred similar mean hospital charges for their surgical visit, they experienced longer hospital LOS (4.3 vs. 4.1 days, p = 0.035). For both TKA and THA, OP patients had higher rates of overall and individual medical and surgical complications (all, p < 0.05). OP was independently associated with the 2-year occurrence of any overall, surgical, and medical complications, and any revision in TKA and THA patients (all, OR ≥ 1.42, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study found OP was associated with a greater risk of 2-year adverse outcomes following TKA or THA, including medical, surgical, and overall complications as well as revision operations compared to non-OP patients.

Prevalence of osteoporosis in patients awaiting unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a cross-sectional study

Objectives

Osteoporosis may contribute to failure of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), yet the prevalence of osteoporosis in the population awaiting UKA has not been adequately studied. The objectives of this study were to report the prevalence of osteoporosis in people awaiting UKA and the rate of anti-osteoporosis treatment, and to explore factors associated with osteoporosis prevalence in people awaiting UKA.

Methods

Participants awaiting UKA from January 2019 to May 2023 were consecutively enrolled. Participants ' age, gender, BMI, knee K-L score, VAS score, history of previous DXA testing, history of anti-osteoporosis treatment, and possible underlying risk factors were recorded. All participants were given a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) test after the visit. The diagnosis of osteoporosis was made according to the World Health Organization criteria. Compare the prevalence of osteoporosis between people waiting for UKA and the general population. Risk factors associated with osteoporosis were analyzed using multiple linear regression and binary logistic regression models.

Results

A total of 340 participants were included in the study, 259 in female and 81 in male, with a mean age of 63.53 years (range: 41-84 years), and all participants completed UKA and had DXA prior to UKA. The prevalence of osteoporosis was 40.88% (44.79% in female and 28.40% in male). The prevalence of osteoporosis was higher in female than in male (p<0.001). The prevalence of osteoporosis in the population waiting for UKA was significantly higher than that in the general population (p < 0.001). DXA testing was performed in 12.06% within 1 year prior to the visit. The percentage of those who had received anti-osteoporosis treatment was 20.59% (20.86% in osteoporosis, 22.39% in Osteopenia and 16.42% in normal bone mass). The correlation between age, gender, body mass index, visual analogue scale score and osteoporosis was statistically significant.

Conclusion

Osteoporosis is common in people waiting for UKA, but screening and treatment rates are low. Female patients of advanced age and low weight combined with significant pain should be considered for osteoporosis screening and appropriate treatment before UKA.

The effect of reduced bone mineral density on elective total hip arthroplasty outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Reduced bone mineral density (BMD) and disruption of normal bony architecture are the characteristics of osteopenia and osteoporosis and in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) may cause failure of trabecular ingrowth. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of reduced BMD on outcomes following primary elective THA.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 650 elective THAs with a DEXA scan in their electronic health record (EHR) from 2011 to 2020 was conducted at an urban, academic center and a regional, health center. Patients were separated into three cohorts based on their t-score and the World Health Organizations definitions: normal (t-score ≥ - 1), osteopenia (t-score < - 1.0 and > - 2.5), and osteoporosis (t-score ≤ - 2.5). Demographic and outcome data were assessed. Subsidence was assessed for patients with non-cemented THAs. Regression models were used to account for demographic differences.

RESULTS

650 elective THAs, of which only 11 were cemented, were included in the study. Patients with osteopenia and osteoporosis were significantly older than those without (p = 0.002 and p < 0.0001, respectively) and had a lower BMI (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively). PFx was significantly greater in patients with osteoporosis when compared to those with normal BMD (6.5% vs. 1.0%; p = 0.04). No such difference was found between osteoporotic and osteopenic patients. The revision rate was significantly higher for osteoporotic patients than osteopenic patients (7.5% vs. 1.5%; p = 0.04). No such difference was found between the other comparison groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients with osteoporosis were older with reduced BMI and had increased PFx after non-cemented elective THA. Understanding this can help surgeons formulate an appropriate preoperative plan for the treatment of patients with osteoporotic bone undergoing elective THA.

Prevalence of osteoporosis in spinal surgery patients older than 50 years: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

In spine surgery, poor bone condition is associated with several complications like adjacent segment fractures, proximal junctional kyphosis, and screw loosening. Our study explored the prevalence of osteoporosis in spinal surgery patients older than 50 years through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the PRISMA criteria. Three electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, were searched from inception to August 2022. We used the random-effects model to calculate the overall estimates, and the heterogeneity was measured using Cochran's Q and I2 tests. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were used to determine the source of the heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Based on the inclusion and criteria, we chose ten studies with 2958 individuals for our analysis. The prevalence of osteoporosis, osteopenia, and osteoporosis/osteopenia in the spinal surgery patients was 34.2% (95%CI: 24.5%-44.6%), 43.5% (95%CI: 39.8%-47.2%), and 78.7% (95%CI: 69.0%-87.0%), respectively. Regarding different diagnoses, the prevalence was highest in patients with lumbar scoliosis (55.8%; 95%CI: 46.8%-64.7%) and the lowest in patients with cervical disc herniation (12.9%; 95%CI: 8.1%-18.7%). In age groups 50-59, 50-69,70-79, the prevalence was 27.8%, 60.4%, 75.4% in females, and 18.9%, 17.4%, 26.1% in males.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed a high prevalence of osteoporosis in patients undergoing spine surgery, especially in females, people of older age, and patients who received degenerative scoliosis and compression fractures. Current osteoporosis screening standards for patients undergoing spine surgery may not be adequate. Orthopedic specialists should make more efforts regarding preoperative osteoporosis screening and treatment.

The impact of prior fragility fractures on long-term periprosthetic fracture risk following total knee arthroplasty

The study found that patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty with prior fragility fracture had increased risk of subsequent fragility fracture and periprosthetic fracture within 8 years postoperatively when compared to those without a prior history. However, these patients were not at increased risk for all-cause revision within this period.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to characterize the association of prior FFs on long-term risk of secondary fragility fracture (FF), periprosthetic fracture (PPF), and revision TKA.

METHODS

Patients at least 50 years of age who underwent elective TKA were identified in the PearlDiver Database. Patients were stratified based on whether they sustained a FF within 3 years prior to TKA (7410 patients) or not (712,954 patients). Demographics and comorbidities were collected. Kaplan Meier analysis was used to observe the cumulative incidence of all-cause revision, PPF, and secondary FF within 8 years of TKA. Cox Proportional hazard ratio analysis was used to statistically compare the risk.

RESULTS

In total, 1.0% of patients had a FF within three years of TKA. Of these patients, only 22.6% and 10.9% had a coded diagnosis of osteoporosis and osteopenia, respectively, at time of TKA. The 8-year cumulative incidence of secondary FF and periprosthetic fracture was significantly higher in those with a prior FF (27.5% secondary FF and 1.9% PPF) when compared to those without (9.1% secondary FF and 0.7% PPF). After adjusting for covariates, patients with a recent FF had significantly higher risks of secondary FF (HR 2.73; p < 0.001) and periprosthetic fracture (HR 1.86; p < 0.001) than those without a recent FF.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent FF before TKA is associated with increased risk for additional FF and PPF within 8 years following TKA. Surgeons should ensure appropriate management of fragility fracture is undertaken prior to TKA to minimize fracture risk, and if not, be vigilant to identify patients with prior FF or other bone health risk factors who may have undocumented osteoporosis.

Evaluation of FRAX in patients with periprosthetic fractures following primary total hip and knee arthroplasty

The fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) is a tool which calculates an individual 10-year fracture risk based on epidemiological data in patients with a risk of osteporosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of FRAX to estimate the risk of postoperative periprosthetic fractures (PPF) in patients following with total hip and knee arthroplasty. 167 patients (137 periprosthetic fractures in total hip arthroplasty and 30 periprosthetic fractures in total knee arthroplasty) were included in this study. Patients' data was retrieved retrospectively. In each patient the 10-year probability of a major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and an osteoporotic hip fracture (HF) was calculated using FRAX. According to the NOGG guideline 57% of total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients and 43.3% of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients were in need of osteoporosis treatment, whereas only 8% and 7% received an adequate one respectively. 56% of the patients with PPF after THA and 57% of the patients with PPF after TKA reported about a previous fracture. Significant associations between the 10-year probability of a MOF and HF calculated by FRAX and PPF in THA and TKA were seen. The results of the present study show that FRAX might have the potential to estimate the PPF in patients following THA and TKA. FRAX should be calculated before and after THA or TKA in order to assess the risk and counsel patients. The data show a clear undertreatment of patients with PPF in respect to osteoporosis.

Is Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty Safe in Women Over 75 Y of Age?

BACKGROUND

Cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the subject of renewed interest. Previous concerns about survivorship have been addressed and there is an appeal in terms of biological fixation and surgical efficiency. However, even surgeon advocates have concerns about the risk of marked subsidence when using this technology in older patients at risk for osteoporosis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of 1,000 consecutive fully cementless mobile bearing TKAs performed at a single institution on women over 75 years of age who had postoperative and 1-year x-rays. The primary outcome was the incidence of subsidence.

RESULTS

There were three asymptomatic cases with definite subsidence and change in alignment. In a fourth symptomatic case, the femoral component subsided into varus and the tibia into valgus, thus maintaining alignment which facilitated nonoperative treatment in a 92-year-old. Overall, at 1 year, there were two- liner revisions for infection without recurrence. Five patients had further surgery, of which three were washouts and two were for periprosthetic fractures sustained postoperatively within 1 year. Seven patients had further anesthesia, of which five were manipulations and two were nonrecurrent closed reductions for spinouts.

CONCLUSION

Cementless TKA did not have a high risk of subsidence in this at-risk population. In the hands of experienced surgeons, these procedures can be used safely irrespective of bone quality.

CT required to perform robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty can identify previously undiagnosed osteoporosis and guide femoral fixation strategy

Osteoporosis can determine surgical strategy for total hip arthroplasty (THA), and perioperative fracture risk. The aims of this study were to use hip CT to measure femoral bone mineral density (BMD) using CT X-ray absorptiometry (CTXA), determine if systematic evaluation of preoperative femoral BMD with CTXA would improve identification of osteopenia and osteoporosis compared with available preoperative dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) analysis, and determine if improved recognition of low BMD would affect the use of cemented stem fixation. Retrospective chart review of a single-surgeon database identified 78 patients with CTXA performed prior to robotic-assisted THA (raTHA) (Group 1). Group 1 was age- and sex-matched to 78 raTHAs that had a preoperative hip CT but did not have CTXA analysis (Group 2). Clinical demographics, femoral fixation method, CTXA, and DXA data were recorded. Demographic data were similar for both groups. Preoperative femoral BMD was available for 100% of Group 1 patients (CTXA) and 43.6% of Group 2 patients (DXA). CTXA analysis for all Group 1 patients preoperatively identified 13 osteopenic and eight osteoporotic patients for whom there were no available preoperative DXA data. Cemented stem fixation was used with higher frequency in Group 1 versus Group 2 (28.2% vs 14.3%, respectively; p = 0.030), and in all cases where osteoporosis was diagnosed, irrespective of technique (DXA or CTXA). Preoperative hip CT scans which are routinely obtained prior to raTHA can determine bone health, and thus guide femoral fixation strategy. Systematic preoperative evaluation with CTXA resulted in increased recognition of osteopenia and osteoporosis, and contributed to increased use of cemented femoral fixation compared with routine clinical care; in this small study, however, it did not impact short-term periprosthetic fracture risk.

Proposed bone health screening protocol to identify total knee arthroplasty patients for preoperative DXA

This study evaluates a novel, simple bone health screening protocol composed of patient sex, age, fracture history, and FRAX risk to identify total knee arthroplasty patients for preoperative DXA. Findings supported effectiveness, with sensitivity of 1.00 (CI 0.92-1.00) and specificity of 0.54 (CI 0.41-0.68) when evaluating for clinical osteoporosis.

PURPOSE

Bone health optimization is a process where osteoporotic patients are identified, evaluated via modalities such as dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and treated when indicated. There are currently no established guidelines to determine who needs presurgical DXA. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a simple screening protocol to identify TKA patients for preoperative DXA.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study began on September 1, 2019, and included 100 elective TKA patients. Inclusion criteria were ≥ 50 years and primary TKA. All patients obtained routine clinical DXA. The screening protocol defining who should obtain DXA included meeting any of the following: female ≥ 65, male ≥ 70, fracture history after age 50, or FRAX major osteoporotic fracture risk without bone mineral density (BMD) adjustments ≥ 8.4%. Osteoporosis was defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria (T-score ≤  - 2.5) or clinically (T-score ≤  - 2.5, elevated BMD-adjusted FRAX risk, or prior hip/spine fracture). Sensitivity and specificity were calculated.

RESULTS

The study included 68 females and 32 males, mean age 67.2 ± 7.7. T-score osteoporosis was observed in 16 patients while 43 had clinical osteoporosis. Screening criteria recommending DXA was met by 69 patients. Screening sensitivity was 1.00 (CI 0.79-1.00) and specificity was 0.37 (CI 0.27-0.48) for identifying patients with T-score osteoporosis. Similar sensitivity of 1.00 (CI 0.92-1.00) and specificity of 0.54 (CI 0.41-0.68) were found for clinical osteoporosis.

CONCLUSIONS

A simple screening protocol identifies TKA patients with T-score and clinical osteoporosis for preoperative DXA with high sensitivity in this prospective cohort study.

The prevalence and treatment of osteoporosis in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty and the levels of biochemical markers of bone turnover

AIMS

Osteoporosis is common in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients. It plays a substantial factor in the surgery's outcome, and previous studies have revealed that pharmacological treatment for osteoporosis influences implant survival rate. The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of and treatment rates for osteoporosis prior to THA, and to explore differences in osteoporosis-related biomarkers between patients treated and untreated for osteoporosis.

METHODS

This single-centre retrospective study included 398 hip joints of patients who underwent THA. Using medical records, we examined preoperative bone mineral density measures of the hip and lumbar spine using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans and the medications used to treat osteoporosis at the time of admission. We also assessed the following osteoporosis-related biomarkers: tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRACP-5b); total procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide (total P1NP); intact parathyroid hormone; and homocysteine.

RESULTS

The prevalence of DXA-proven hip osteoporosis (T-score ≤ -2.5) among THA patients was 8.8% (35 of 398). The spinal osteoporosis prevalence rate was 4.5% (18 of 398), and 244 patients (61.3%; 244 of 398) had osteopenia (-2.5 < T-score ≤ -1) or osteoporosis of either the hip or spine. The rate of pharmacological osteoporosis treatment was 22.1% (88 of 398). TRACP-5b was significantly lower in the osteoporosis-treated group than in the untreated group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Osteoporosis is common in patients undergoing THA, but the diagnosis and treatment for osteoporosis were insufficient. The lower TRACP-5b levels in the osteoporosis-treated group - that is, osteoclast suppression - may contribute to the reduction of the postoperative revision rate after THA.Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(12):873-880.

Fracture Risk Assessment Tool Scores and Radiographical Bone Measurements in Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis is a major risk factor for periprosthetic fractures (PPFx) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients but is not routinely screened for in this population. Given the availability of hip x-rays and preoperative screenings, Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) scores and radiographic bone measurements are potentially promising, novel risk stratification tools. This study aims to characterize FRAX scores and radiographic bone measurements in THA and PPFx patients.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review for demographic variables and FRAX scores was performed on 250 THA and 40 PPFx patients. Radiographic bone measurements including cortical thicknesses (both antero-posterior [AP] and lateral), canal to calcar ratio, canal flare index, and Dorr classifications were obtained from preoperative x-rays. Correlation between FRAX scores and radiographic bone measurements was investigated with linear regressions. FRAX scores and radiographic bone measurements were compared between the THA and PPFx patients. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to identify factors predicting PPFx.

RESULTS

FRAX scores were significantly correlated with both AP (P < .001) and lateral (P = .007) cortical thicknesses. Compared to THA patients, those with PPFx had significantly higher FRAX scores (P = .003) and lower AP cortical thickness (P = .005). Multivariate logistic regressions demonstrated that FRAX major osteoporotic fracture risk score and AP cortical thickness were independent predictors of PPFx (P = .001 and .024, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Cortical thicknesses are good proxy measurements of osteoporosis-related fracture risk in THA patients. In addition, both major and AP cortical thickness indices are promising tools for identifying patients who are at a high risk of PPFx in the THA population.

Prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia in elderly patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Osteoporosis is a common comorbidity in elderly patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and may increase perioperative complications in orthopedic surgery (e.g., component migration, periprosthetic fractures). As there is no investigation of bone mineral density (BMD) in elderly patients prior to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in Europe, we investigated this issue with a particular focus on a potential treatment gap.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We assessed the BMD by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in 109 consecutive elderly patients (age ≥ 70 years) scheduled for TKA. In addition to a detailed assessment of osteoporosis and osteopenia, the influence of clinical risk factors and radiological OA severity on BMD was evaluated using group comparisons and linear regression models. In addition, we analyzed differences in BMD between patients scheduled for TKA vs. total hip arthroplasty (THA).

RESULTS

Of the included 109 patients, 19 patients (17.4%) were diagnosed with osteoporosis and 50 (45.9%) with osteopenia. In the osteoporotic patients, a clinically relevant underdiagnosis concomitant with a serious treatment gap was observed in 95.0% of the patients. Body mass index, OA grade, and glucocorticoid use were identified as independent factors associated with BMD. No differences in BMD were found between the patients scheduled for TKA vs. THA.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the high prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia in elderly patients, DXA screening should be recommended for patients ≥ 70 years indicated for TKA.

Reduced Awareness for Osteoporosis in Hip Fracture Patients Compared to Elderly Patients Undergoing Elective Hip Replacement

Background: Osteoporotic fractures are associated with a loss of quality of life, but only few patients receive an appropriate therapy. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate the awareness of musculoskeletal patients to participate in osteoporosis assessment and to evaluate whether there are significant differences between acute care patients treated for major fractures of the hip compared to elective patients treated for hip joint replacement.; Methods: From May 2015 to December 2016 patients who were undergoing surgical treatment for proximal femur fracture or total hip replacement due to osteoarthritis and were at risk for an underlying osteoporosis (female > 60 and male > 70 years) were included in the study and asked to complete a questionnaire assessing the awareness for an underlying osteoporosis. ASA Score, FRAX Score, and demographic information have also been examined. Results: In total 268 patients (female = 194 (72.0%)/male = 74 (28%)), mean age 77.7 years (±7.7) undergoing hip surgery were included. Of these, 118 were treated for fracture-related etiology and 150 underwent total hip arthroplasty in an elective care setting. Patients were interviewed about their need for osteoporosis examination during hospitalization. Overall, 76 of 150 patients receiving elective care (50.7%) considered that an examination was necessary, whereas in proximal femur fracture patients the awareness was lower, and the disease osteoporosis was assessed as threatening by significantly fewer newly fractured patients. By comparison, patients undergoing trauma surgery had a considerably greater risk of developing another osteoporotic fracture than patients undergoing elective surgery determined by the FRAX® Score (p ≤ 0.001).; Conclusions: The patients’ motivation to endure additional osteoporosis diagnostic testing is notoriously low and needs to be increased. Patients who underwent acute care surgery for a fragility proximal femur fracture, although acutely affected by the potential consequences of underlying osteoporosis, showed lower awareness than the elective comparison population that was also on average 6.1 years younger. Although elective patients were younger and at a lower risk, they seemed to be much more willing to undergo further osteoporosis assessment. In order to better identify and care for patients at risk, interventions such as effective screening, early initiation of osteoporosis therapy in the inpatient setting and a fracture liaison service are important measures.

Nonsurgical management of atraumatic early distal femoral periprosthetic insufficiency fracture after primary total knee arthroplasty, a report of two cases

Periprosthetic distal femoral fractures after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are considered rare; however, they pose a challenge for the treating surgeon, and the management options are mostly surgical (open reduction and internal fixation or revision surgery). We present two female patients who developed atraumatic lateral femoral condyle fractures three weeks after primary TKA; both were treated nonsurgically with acceptable outcomes and patient satisfaction. We believe that nonsurgical management of periprosthetic distal femoral fractures could be an economical solution in selected cases; it also could help maintain the distal femoral bone stock till a revision surgery is performed.

Proceedings of the 2022 Santa Fe Bone Symposium: Current Concepts in the Care of Patients with Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Diseases

The 22^nd Annual Santa Fe Bone Symposium (SFBS) was a hybrid meeting held August 5-6, 2022, with in-person and virtual attendees. Altogether, over 400 individuals registered, a majority of whom attended in-person, representing many states in the USA plus 7 other countries. The SFBS included 10 plenary presentations, 2 faculty panel discussions, satellite symposia, Bone Health & Osteoporosis Foundation Fracture Liaison Service Boot Camp, and a Project ECHO workshop, with lively interactive discussions for all events. Topics of interest included fracture prevention at different stages of life; how to treat and when to change therapy; skeletal health in cancer patients; advanced imaging to assess bone strength; the state of healthcare in the USA; osteosarcopenia; vitamin D update; perioperative bone health care; new guidelines for managing primary hyperparathyroidism; new concepts on bone modeling and remodeling; and an overview on the care of rare bone diseases, including hypophosphatasia, X-linked hypophosphatemia, tumor induced osteomalacia, osteogenesis imperfecta, fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva, and osteopetrosis. The SFBS was preceded by the Santa Fe Fellows Workshop on Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Diseases, a collaboration of the Endocrine Fellows Foundation and the Osteoporosis Foundation of New Mexico. From the Workshop, 4 participating fellows were selected to give oral presentations at the bone symposium. These proceedings represent the clinical highlights of 2022 SFBS presentations and the discussions that followed, all with the aim of optimizing skeletal health and minimizing the consequences of fragile bones.

The clinician's guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is the most common metabolic bone disease in the USA and the world. It is a subclinical condition until complicated by fracture(s). These fractures place an enormous medical and personal burden on individuals who suffer from them and take a significant economic toll. Any new fracture in an adult aged 50 years or older signifies imminent elevated risk for subsequent fractures, particularly in the year following the initial fracture. What a patient perceives as an unfortunate accident may be seen as a sentinel event indicative of bone fragility and increased future fracture risk even when the result of considerable trauma. Clinical or subclinical vertebral fractures, the most common type of osteoporotic fractures, are associated with a 5-fold increased risk for additional vertebral fractures and a 2- to 3-fold increased risk for fractures at other sites. Untreated osteoporosis can lead to a vicious cycle of recurrent fracture(s), often resulting in disability and premature death. In appropriate patients, treatment with effective antifracture medication prevents fractures and improves outcomes. Primary care providers and medical specialists are critical gatekeepers who can identify fractures and initiate proven osteoporosis interventions. Osteoporosis detection, diagnosis, and treatment should be routine practice in all adult healthcare settings. The Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation (BHOF) - formerly the National Osteoporosis Foundation - first published the Clinician's Guide in 1999 to provide accurate information on osteoporosis prevention and treatment. Since that time, significant improvements have been made in diagnostic technologies and treatments for osteoporosis. Despite these advances, a disturbing gap persists in patient care. At-risk patients are often not screened to establish fracture probability and not educated about fracture prevention. Most concerning, the majority of highest risk women and men who have a fracture(s) are not diagnosed and do not receive effective, FDA-approved therapies. Even those prescribed appropriate therapy are unlikely to take the medication as prescribed. The Clinician's Guide offers concise recommendations regarding prevention, risk assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and men aged 50 years and older. It includes indications for bone densitometry as well as fracture risk thresholds for pharmacologic intervention. Current medications build bone and/or decrease bone breakdown and dramatically reduce incident fractures. All antifracture therapeutics treat but do not cure the disease. Skeletal deterioration resumes sooner or later when a medication is discontinued-sooner for nonbisphosphonates and later for bisphosphonates. Even if normal BMD is achieved, osteoporosis and elevated risk for fracture are still present. The diagnosis of osteoporosis persists even if subsequent DXA T-scores are above - 2.5. Ongoing monitoring and strategic interventions will be necessary if fractures are to be avoided. In addition to pharmacotherapy, adequate intake of calcium and vitamin D, avoidance of smoking and excessive alcohol intake, weight-bearing and resistance-training exercise, and fall prevention are included in the fracture prevention armamentarium. Where possible, recommendations in this guide are based on evidence from RCTs; however, relevant published data and guidance from expert clinical experience provides the basis for recommendations in those areas where RCT evidence is currently deficient or not applicable to the many osteoporosis patients not considered for RCT participation due to age and morbidity.

Total Joint Arthroplasty and Osteoporosis: Looking Beyond the Joint to Bone Health

BACKGROUND

Metabolic bone diseases in the total joint arthroplasty (TJA) population are undertested and undertreated, leading to increased risk of adverse outcomes such as periprosthetic fractures. This study aims to better characterize the current state of bone care in TJA patients using Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) score risk stratifications.

METHODS

In total, 505 consecutive TJA patients who meet the Endocrine Society guidelines for osteoporosis screening were included for review. They were divided into a high risk or low risk group depending on FRAX scores and were compared based on screening, diagnosis, and treatment of metabolic bone disease. Logistic regression models were used to analyze factors influencing screening and treatment. A population analysis involving 2,000 TJA patients, and a complication analysis involving 40 periprosthetic fracture patients were conducted.

RESULTS

Among high risk patients undergoing TJA, 90% did not receive any pharmacological treatment for osteoporosis, 45% were not treated with vitamin D or calcium, and 88% did not receive bone density testing in the routine care period. Among patients with pre-existing osteoporosis undergoing TJA, 80% were not treated with any osteoporosis medications and 33% of these patients were not taking vitamin D or calcium. Female gender and past fracture history contributed to whether patients received screening and treatment. Patients with periprosthetic hip fractures have significantly higher FRAX scores compared to control THA patients.

CONCLUSION

There are significant gaps in metabolic bone care of the geriatric TJA population regarding both screening and treatment. Metabolic bone care and risk identification with FRAX should be highly considered for TJA patients.

A Novel Osteoporosis Screening Protocol to Identify Orthopedic Surgery Patients for Preoperative Bone Health Optimization

Introduction

Osteoporosis is highly prevalent in elective orthopedic surgery. While preoperative bone health optimization decreases osteoporosis-related complications, there is an unmet need to establish who may benefit from preoperative dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). This study assesses a novel, simple screening protocol to identify orthopedic surgical patients for preoperative DXA.

Materials/Methods

This retrospective cohort study included 628 patients undergoing total knee, hip, or shoulder arthroplasty or thoracolumbar spine fusion. Inclusion criteria were ≥40 years undergoing primary elective surgery. Screening criteria defining who should obtain DXA due to high osteoporosis risk included: female ≥65, male ≥70, fracture history when ≥50 years, or FRAX major osteoporotic fracture risk (without bone mineral density [BMD]-adjustments) ≥8.4%. Osteoporosis was defined by World Health Organization criteria [T-score ≤ -2.5], clinical National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) criteria [T-score ≤ -2.5, elevated BMD-adjusted FRAX risk, or prior hip/spine fracture], and modified clinical criteria [NOF criteria simplified to include any non-traumatic prior fracture and FRAX without BMD].

Results

The study included 100 TKAs, 100 THAs, 251 TSAs, and 177 spine fusions, average age 65.6 ± 9.8. DXA was available for 209 patients. Screening criteria recommending DXA was met by 362 patients. For those with DXA, screening sensitivity was .96 (CI: .78 to .99) and specificity was .19 (CI: .14 to .25) for identifying T-score osteoporosis. Similar sensitivity of .99 (CI: .91 to .99) and specificity of .61 (CI: .56 to .66) were found for modified clinical osteoporosis. For modified clinical osteoporosis, 192 patients with osteoporosis met criteria (true pos.), 1 patient with osteoporosis did not meet criteria (false neg.), 170 patients without osteoporosis met criteria (false pos.), and 265 patients without osteoporosis did not meet criteria (true neg.).

Discussion/Conclusion

A simple screening protocol identifies orthopedic surgical candidates at risk of T-score or clinical osteoporosis for preoperative DXA with high sensitivity.

Osteoporosis in Indian Patients Undergoing Elective Arthroplasty and Spinal Procedures: An Observational Study

Background This is an observational study conducted to determine the prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia in patients undergoing elective arthroplasty and spinal procedures in India. Methods This observational, multicentre study included both male and female patients. Their bone mineral density and fracture risk were measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®: Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, UK), respectively, in compliance with the guidelines for Good Epidemiological Practice (ISRCTN: 14543098). Results The study revealed that majority (76.4%; 97/127) of the patients had low BMD; over one-third had osteoporosis (39.4%; 50/127) or osteopenia (37%; 47/127). Among those undergoing total knee replacement (TKR)/total hip replacement (THR), majority (75.6%; 59/78) had low BMD (osteoporosis: 38.5% {30/78}; osteopenia: 37.2% {29/78}). Among the patients undergoing spinal procedures, all except two (93.10%; 27/29) had low BMD, two-thirds had osteoporosis (65.5%; 19/29), and around one-fourth had osteopenia (27.6%; 8/29). Radial BMD measurements showed higher prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia. Based on FRAX score, nearly 30% of patients were at a high risk of hip fracture in the next 10 years. As per National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) guidelines, most (59.79%; 58/97) patients with osteoporosis/osteopenia met criteria for pharmacological treatment. Conclusions Regular preoperative bone health evaluation should be adopted and osteoporosis/osteopenia patients should be adequately managed pharmacologically in India.

Osteoporosis Diagnosis, Management, and Referral Practice After Fragility Fractures

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this manuscript is to review the current diagnosis, management, and referral practices of patients with osteoporosis after a fragility fracture from the orthopedic surgeon's perspective.

RECENT FINDINGS

Effective treatments are available for osteoporosis that significantly decrease the risk of additional fractures. Despite recommendations for improved post-fragility fracture osteoporosis management, the rate of diagnosis and treatment is still unacceptably low. Patients sustaining a low-energy fracture should be evaluated for osteoporosis with discussion of beginning pharmacological treatment. Antiresorptive and anabolic agents are available treatment options. Fracture Liaison Services can help to coordinate the care of these patients and improve the rate of diagnosis and initiation of therapy. Dartmouth-Hitchcock is working to improve the bone health for our patients utilizing a multidisciplinary team-based approach. This process is intended to lead to increased recognition of osteoporosis within our institution and close the capture gap between hospital discharge and initiation of osteoporosis pharmacotherapy.

Artificial Neural Networks Can Predict Early Failure of Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Osteoporosis

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) done in the aging population is associated with osteoporosis-related complications. The altered bone density in osteoporotic patients is a risk factor for revision surgery. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning (ML) models to predict revision surgery in patients with osteoporosis after primary noncemented THA.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of 350 patients with osteoporosis (T-score less than or equal to -2.5) who underwent primary noncemented THA at a tertiary referral center. All patients had a minimum 2-year follow-up (range: 2.1 to 5.6). Four ML algorithms were developed to predict the probability of revision surgery, and these were assessed by discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of revision surgery was 5.2% at a mean follow-up of 3.7 years after primary noncemented THA in osteoporotic patients. Revision THA was done because of periprosthetic fracture in nine patients (50%), aseptic loosening/subsidence in five patients (28%), periprosthetic joint infection in two patients (11%) and dislocation in two patients (11%). The strongest predictors for revision surgery in patients after primary noncemented THA were female sex, BMI (>35 kg/m2), age (>70 years), American Society of Anesthesiology score (≥3), and T-score. All four ML models demonstrated good model performance across discrimination (AUC range: 0.78 to 0.81), calibration, and decision curve analysis.

CONCLUSION

The ML models presented in this study demonstrated high accuracy for the prediction of revision surgery in osteoporotic patients after primary noncemented THA. The presented ML models have the potential to be used by orthopaedic surgeons for preoperative patient counseling and optimization to improve the outcomes of primary noncemented THA in osteoporotic patients.

Bisphosphonates in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Review of Their Use and Complications

Background

Considerable interest has been expressed in the use of bisphosphonates to treat periprosthetic osteoporosis with the clinical goals of reducing periprosthetic fractures and prolonging implant survival.

Methods

A systematic review was performed with the goal of identifying both basic science and clinical studies related to the risks and benefits of bisphosphonate use in total joint arthroplasty.

Results

Studies have shown that bisphosphonates may increase early bony ingrowth, decrease the postoperative loss of bone mineral density, and increase the longevity of implants by reducing the need for revisions secondary to aseptic loosening. Continuing bisphosphonates for 1 year postoperatively seems to provide the greatest benefit, with only marginal benefit being shown by continuing therapy for up to 2 years. Current data present some concerns for an increased risk of periprosthetic fractures especially in younger patients, and prolonged therapy is not recommended due to the potential risk of atypical femur fractures. Patients should be counseled regarding the risk of side effects of bisphosphonates, including the risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw, which is a rare but serious side effect. They should also be counseled on the risk of atypical femur fractures and gastrointestinal intolerance.

Conclusions

Orthopedic surgeons could consider bisphosphonates for up to 1 year postoperatively regardless of the patient’s prior bone mineral density, after discussion regarding the risks and benefits with the patient.

Effect of Bone Health Optimization on Osteoporosis Screening and Treatment Before Thoracolumbar Fusion

Objective:

Osteoporosis is not rare in thoracolumbar spine fusion patients and may portend poorer surgical outcomes. Implementation of a bone health optimization (BHO) clinic improves osteoporosis screening and treatment in the total joint arthroplasty population. We hypothesize that preoperative osteoporosis is common, under-recognized, and undertreated in thoracolumbar fusion patients and that a BHO clinic will increase preoperative osteoporosis screening rates and pharmacologic osteoporosis treatment in this population.

Methods:

This retrospective case series includes adults older than 30 years who underwent elective thoracolumbar spine fusion at a single tertiary care center before and after creation of a BHO referral clinic. Data collected included preoperative osteoporosis risk factors, prior dual-energy radiograph absorptiometry testing, and prior osteoporosis pharmacotherapy. Fracture risk was estimated using the fracture risk assessment tool with and without bone mineral density (BMD), and the US National Osteoporosis Foundation criteria for screening and treatment were applied.

Results:

Ninety patients were included in the pre-BHO group; 53 patients met criteria for BMD measurement, but only 10 were tested within 2 years preoperatively. Sixteen patients (18%) met criteria for osteoporosis pharmacotherapy, but only 5 of the 16 (31%) received osteoporosis medication within 6 months of surgery. There were 87 patients in the post-BHO group, and 19 were referred to the BHO clinic. BMD measurement was done in 17 of the patients (89%) referred to the BHO clinic compared with 10% for those not referred. All patients (n = 7) referred to the BHO clinic meeting treatment criteria received treatment within 6 months before surgery, whereas only 25% of the patients not referred received treatment.

Discussion:

Osteoporosis is not rare in adults undergoing thoracolumbar spine fusion with ∼13% to 18% meeting criteria for pharmacotherapy. Preoperative BHO referral increases screening and treatment.

Prevalence and treatment rate of osteoporosis in patients undergoing total knee and hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Due to age and gender, patients awaiting total knee or hip arthroplasty (TKA/THA) are at a higher risk of osteoporosis. In joint arthroplasty, low bone mineral density (BMD) is a risk factor for implant osseointegration, durability, and prosthesis complications. This study aims to investigate the prevalence and treatment rate of osteoporosis in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA).

METHODS

We applied a comprehensive literature search through PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE from inception to July 10, 2021, for studies investigating the prevalence and treatment rate of osteoporosis in TJA patients. The aggregated prevalence was calculated with the random-effects model, and the heterogeneity between studies was checked by Cochran's Q test and quantified by the I² statistic. We performed subgroup analyses and meta-regression analyses to determine the source of heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed by a funnel plot and verified by Egger's test. Anti-osteoporosis treatment for TJA patients was described qualitatively and quantitatively.

RESULTS

Of 4561 citations identified by the search strategy, 11 studies including 3462 patients were eligible for inclusion. The pooled prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia in TJA patients was 24.8% (95%CI: 14.1-37.2%) and 38.5% (95%CI: 29.3-48.0%), respectively. The prevalence of osteoporosis/osteopenia in TJA patients was 64.0% (95%CI: 45.8-80.3%). In terms of gender, the pooled prevalence of osteoporosis in males, females, and postmenopausal females were 5.5% (95%CI: 1.5-11.4%), 29.0% (95%CI: 18.3-41.1%), and 38.3% (95%CI: 13.2-67.1%), respectively. The treatment rate of osteoporosis in TJA patients was 32.9% (95%CI: 15.2-53.1%) by a random-effects model.

CONCLUSIONS

Osteoporosis is highly prevalent in patients undergoing TJA, especially in postmenopausal females. However, the treatment rate of osteoporosis is low. Considering the possibility of surgical complications, clinicians should strengthen their awareness of pre-operative BMD assessment and manage osteoporosis in high-risk patients.

Cones and sleeves present good survival and clinical outcome in revision total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The fixation of revision total knee arthroplasties (rTKA) tends to be difficult, leading to a reduction in implant survival. One option for achieving a more stable anchorage is to use metaphyseal cones and sleeves. The objective of the present paper is to provide a current comparative meta-analysis on survival and clinical results of cones vs. sleeves, with a differentiation between the short- and long-term outcome.

METHODS

A search of the literature was conducted systematically to include original papers from 2010 to June 2021. The following parameters were taken into account: revision for aseptic loosening, revision for any reason, periprosthetic joint infections (PJI), KSS as well as KSFS. Studies with a mean follow-up of at least 60 months were defined to be long-term follow-up studies (LT). All other studies were included in the short-term (ST) study analysis. A pooled incidence was used as a summary statistic using a random intercept logistic regression model.

RESULTS

The present meta-analysis included 43 publications with 3008 rTKA. Of these, 23 publications with 1911 cases were allocated to the sleeve group (SG) and 20 papers with 1097 cases to the cone group (CG). CG showed overall numerically higher complication rates in short- and long-term follow-up, compared with SG. Aseptic loosening occurred at a rate of 0.4% in SG (LT) and 4.1% in CG (LT) (p = 0.09). Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) was more frequent in the cone group (7% in ST and 11.7% in LT) than in the sleeve group (3.4% in ST and 4.9% in LT, p = 0.02 both). The total revision rate was 5.5% in SG (LT) and 14.4% in CG (LT) (p = 0.12). The clinical scores were also comparable between the two groups. Hinged prothesis were used more frequent in the cone group (ST p < 0.001; LT p = 0.10), whereas CC type protheses were used more frequently in the sleeve group (ST p < 0.001; LT p < 0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis takes into account the longest follow-up periods covered to date. Both cones and sleeves represent a reliable fixation method in the case of severe bone loss in rTKA, although the higher rate of PJI after cone fixation remains a source of concern. A metaphyseal fixation of hinged implants should be taken into account.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II (meta-analysis).