Effects of Sagittal Spinal Alignment on Postural Pelvic Mobility in Total Hip Arthroplasty Candidates

Assessment of the hip-spine relationship in total hip arthroplasty for childhood hip disorders sequelae

In this article, we comment on the article by Oommen et al. Oommen et al provided a comprehensive overview of the management of hip centre restoration in total hip arthroplasty (THA) for childhood hip disorder sequelae. Given the developmental disparity in this population, specific preoperative planning is an essential prerequisite for the success of THA procedures. In the review by Oommen et al, assessments of acetabular and femoral anatomic variations were fully described. However, spinal malalignment and stiffness are common in physical and radiological examinations and should be taken into careful consideration when planning surgical procedures. Poor outcomes of THA for patients with comorbid hip and spinopelvic pathologies have been widely reported, especially for hips with childhood disorder sequelae. Therefore, in this editorial, we would like to emphasize the need for a thorough hip-spine evaluation of patients with childhood hip disorder sequelae before THA.

The spinopelvic alignment in patients with prior knee or hip arthroplasty undergoing elective lumbar surgery

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Concurrent degeneration of the lumbar spine, hip, and knee can cause significant disability and lower quality of life. Osteoarthritis in the lower extremities can lead to movement limitations, possibly requiring total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA). These procedures often impact spinal posture, causing alterations in spinopelvic alignment and lumbar spine degeneration. It is unclear if patients with a history of prior total joint arthroplasty (TJA) have different spinopelvic alignment compared to patients without.

PURPOSE

To assess the relationship between a history of previous THA or TKA, as well as combined THA and TKA, and the spinopelvic alignment in patients undergoing elective lumbar surgery for degenerative conditions.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent lumbar surgery for degenerative conditions. The patients were stratified based on a history of TKA, THA, or both TKA and THA.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 632 patients (63% female) with an average age of 64±11 years and an average BMI of 30±6 kg/m2 were included.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Patients were stratified based on a history of THA, TKA, or combined THA and TKA. Spinopelvic parameters (lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), and pelvic incidence (PI)) were assessed. The relationship between spinopelvic alignment and prior TKA, THA or TKA and THA was analyzed.

METHODS

The data was tested for normal distribution using the Shapiro-Wilk test. We analyzed the relationship between the spinopelvic parameters and the different arthroplasty groups. Differences in scores between groups were examined using ANOVA. Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference test was used for pairwise comparison for significant ANOVA test results. Multivariable linear regression was applied, adjusted for age, sex and BMI.

RESULTS

A total of 632 patients (63% female) were included in the study. Of these patients, 74 (12%) had a history of isolated TKA, 40 (6%) had prior isolated THA, and 15 (2%) had TKA and THA prior to lumbar surgery. Patients with prior arthroplasty were predominantly female (59%) and significantly older (68±7 years vs 63±12 years, p<.001) with a significantly higher BMI (31±6 kg/m2 vs 29±6 kg/m2, p<.001). The LL was significantly lower (45.0°±13 vs 50.9°±14 p=.011) in the arthroplasty group compared to the nonarthroplasty group. A history of isolated TKA was significantly associated with lower LL (Est=-3.8, 95% CI -7.3 to -0.3, p=.031) and SS (Est=-2.6, 95% CI -5.0 to -0.2, p=.012) compared to patients without TJA. Prior combined THA and TKA was found to be significantly associated with a higher PT compared to the nonarthroplasty group (Est=5.1, 95% CI 0.4-9.8, p=.034).

CONCLUSIONS

The spinopelvic alignment differs between patients with and without prior TJA who undergo elective lumbar surgery. The study shows that a history of TKA is significantly associated with a lower LL and SS. The combination of THA and TKA was associated with a significantly higher PT. These findings highlight the complex relationship between the hip, spine, and knee. Moreover, the results could aid in enhancing preoperative planning of lumbar surgery in patients with known TJA.

Contemporary insights into spinopelvic mechanics

Understanding spinopelvic mechanics is important for the success of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Despite significant advancements in appreciating spinopelvic balance, numerous challenges remain. It is crucial to recognize the individual variability and postoperative changes in spinopelvic parameters and their consequential impact on prosthetic component positioning to mitigate the risk of dislocation and enhance postoperative outcomes. This review describes the integration of advanced diagnostic approaches, enhanced technology, implant considerations, and surgical planning, all tailored to the unique anatomy and biomechanics of each patient. It underscores the importance of accurately predicting postoperative spinopelvic mechanics, selecting suitable imaging techniques, establishing a consistent nomenclature for spinopelvic stiffness, and considering implant-specific strategies. Furthermore, it highlights the potential of artificial intelligence to personalize care.

How Does Radiographic Acetabular Morphology Change Between the Supine and Standing Positions in Asymptomatic Volunteers?

BACKGROUND

The radiographic appearance of the acetabulum differs between the supine and standing positions in patients with hip conditions. The pelvis undergoes a change in tilt when transitioning between positions, resulting in variations in version and acetabular coverage. However, the extent of these variations in well-functioning volunteers without compensatory patterns caused by pain is unknown.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We performed this study to (1) quantify differences in radiographic acetabular measurements when transitioning between supine and standing among asymptomatic, well-functioning volunteers; (2) assess differences in pelvic tilt between positions; and (3) test whether individual anatomic parameters are associated with the change in tilt.

METHODS

This was a prospective, single-center study performed at an academic referral center. One hundred volunteers (students, staff, and patients with upper limb injuries) with well-functioning hips (Oxford hip score ≥ 45) were invited to participate. A total of 45% (45) of them were female, their mean age was 37 ± 14 years, and their mean BMI was 25 ± 2 kg/m 2 . Supine and standing AP pelvic radiographs were analyzed to determine numerous acetabular parameters including the lateral center-edge angle (LCEA), acetabular index (AI), anterior wall index (AWI), posterior wall index (PWI), crossover sign (COS), crossover ratio (COR), posterior wall sign (PWS), ischial spine sign (ISS), and femoroepiphyseal acetabular roof index (FEAR), as well as pelvic parameters including the sacrofemoral-pubic angle (SFP). Spinopelvic parameters were measured from lateral standing spinopelvic radiographs. Radiographic measurements were performed by one hip preservation research fellow and a fellowship-trained staff surgeon. Differences in parameters were determined, and correlations between postural differences and morphological parameters were tested. Clinically important differences were defined as a difference greater than 3° for acetabular angle measurements and 0.03 for acetabular ratio measurements, based on previous studies.

RESULTS

Lateral coverage angles did not show a clinically important difference between positions. AWI decreased when standing (0.47 ± 0.13 versus 0.41 ± 0.14; p < 0.001), whereas acetabular retroversion signs were more pronounced when supine (COS: 34% [34 of 100], PWS: 68% [68 of 100], and ISS: 34% [34 of 100] versus COS: 19% [19 of 100], PWS: 38% [38 of 100], and ISS: 14% [14 of 100]; all p values < 0.05). Pelvic tilt increased by a mean of 4° ± 4° when standing, but the range of change was from -15° to 7°. The change in AWI (ρ = 0.47; p < 0.001), PWI (ρ = -0.45; p < 0.001), and COR (ρ = 0.52; p < 0.001) between positions correlated with ΔSFP. Volunteers with spinal imbalance (pelvic incidence lumbar lordosis > 10°) demonstrated greater change in pelvic tilt (ΔSFP) (-7° ± 3° versus -4° ± 4°; p = 0.02) and a greater reduction in AWI (by 10%). These volunteers demonstrated reduced standing lumbar lordosis angles (45° ± 11° versus 61° ± 10°; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Acetabular version increases from supine to standing because of an increase in pelvic tilt. The change in pelvic tilt between positions exhibited substantial variability. Individuals with reduced lumbar lordosis for a given pelvic incidence value demonstrated greater pelvic mobility. No features on supine radiographs were associated with the change in tilt.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Performing standing radiographs in addition to supine views can help identify aberrant physiologic patterns in patients with diagnostic dilemmas and might thus help with management. Normative data of pelvic tilt change can help clinicians identify patients who demonstrate excessive change in tilt that contributes to abnormal hip pathomechanics.

Hip-spine parameters change with increasing age

Aims

Spinopelvic pathology increases the risk for instability following total hip arthroplasty (THA), yet few studies have evaluated how pathology varies with age or sex. The aims of this study were: 1) to report differences in spinopelvic parameters with advancing age and between the sexes; and 2) to determine variation in the prevalence of THA instability risk factors with advancing age.

Methods

A multicentre database with preoperative imaging for 15,830 THA patients was reviewed. Spinopelvic parameter measurements were made by experienced engineers, including anterior pelvic plane tilt (APPT), spinopelvic tilt (SPT), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), and pelvic incidence (PI). Lumbar flexion (LF), sagittal spinal deformity, and hip user index (HUI) were calculated using parameter measurements.

Results

With advancing age, patients demonstrate increased posterior APPT, decreased standing LL, decreased LF, higher pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch, higher prevalence of abnormal spinopelvic mobility, and higher HUI percentage. With each decade, APPT progressed posteriorly 2.1°, LF declined 6.0°, PI-LL mismatch increased 2.9°, and spinopelvic mobility increased 3.8°. Significant differences were found between the sexes for APPT, SPT, SS, LL, and LF, but were not felt to be clinically relevant.

Conclusion

With advancing age, spinopelvic biomechanics demonstrate decreased spinal mobility and increased pelvic/hip mobility. Surgeons should consider the higher prevalence of instability risk factors in elderly patients and anticipate changes evolving in spinopelvic biomechanics for young patients.

Change in cup orientation from supine to standing posture: a prospective cohort study of 419 total hip arthroplasties

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Arthroplasty surgeons traditionally assess cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty (THA) on supine radiographs. Contemporary hip-spine analyses provide information on standing, functional cup orientation. This study aims to (i) characterize cup orientations when supine and standing; (ii) determine orientation differences between postures; and (iii) identify factors associated with magnitude of orientation differences.

METHODS

This is a 2-center, multi-surgeon, prospective, consecutive cohort study. 419 primary THAs were included (57% women; mean age: 64 years, standard deviation [SD] 11). All patients underwent supine and standing antero-posterior pelvic and lateral spinopelvic radiographs. Cup orientation and spinopelvic parameters were measured. Target cup orientation was defined as inclination/anteversion of 40°/20° ± 10°. A change in orientation (Δinclination/Δanteversion) between postures > 5° was defined as clinically significant. Variability was defined as 2 x SD.

RESULTS

Inclination increased from 40° (supine) to 42° (standing) corresponding to a Δinclination of 2° (95% confidence interval [CI] 2-3). Anteversion increased from 25° (supine) to 30° (standing) corresponding to a Δanteversion of 5° (CI 5-6). When supine, 69% (CI 65-74) of THAs were within target, but only 44% (CI 39-49) were within target when standing, resulting in a further 26% (CI 21-30) being out of target when standing. From supine to standing, a clinically significant change in anteversion (> 5°) was seen in 47% (CI 42-52) of cases. Δanteversion was higher in women than in men (6°, CI 5-7 vs 5°, CI 4-5) corresponding to a difference of 1° (CI 1-2), which was dependent on tilt change, standing cup anteversion, age, and standing pelvic tilt.

CONCLUSION

Cup inclination and version increase upon standing but significant variability exists due to patient factors.

Spinopelvic Motion: A Simplified Approach to a Complex Subject

Knowledge of the relationship between the hip and spine is essential in the effort to minimize instability and improve outcomes following total hip arthroplasty (THA). A detailed yet straightforward preoperative imaging workup can provide valuable information on pelvic positioning, which may be helpful for optimum placement of the acetabular cup. For a streamlined preoperative assessment of THA candidates, classification systems with a capacity for providing a more personalized approach to performance of THA have been introduced. Familiarity with these systems and their clinical application is important in the effort to optimize component placement and reduce the risk of instability. Looking ahead, the principles of the hip-spine relationship are being integrated using emerging innovative technologies, promising further streamlining of the evaluation process.

Mobility of the lumbo-pelvic-hip complex (spinopelvic mobility) and sagittal spinal alignment - implications for surgeons performing hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

The optimal positioning of the hip prosthesis components is influenced by the mobility and balance of the spine. The present study classifies patients with pathology of the spino-pelvic-hip complex, showing possible methods of preventing hip dislocations after arthroplasty.

HYPOTHESIS

Hip-Spine Classification helps arthroplasty surgeons to implant components in more patient-specific position.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The group of 100 patients treated with total hip arthroplasty. Antero-posterior (AP) X-rays of the pelvis in a standing position, lateral spine (standing and sitting) and AP of the pelvis (supine after the procedure) were analyzed. We analyzed a change in sacral tilt value when changing from standing to sitting (∆SS), Pelvic Incidence (PI), Lumbar Lordosis (LL) Mismatch, sagittal lumbar pelvic balance (standing position). Patients were classified according to the Hip-Spine Classification. Postoperatively, the inclination and anteversion of the implanted acetabular component were measured.

RESULTS

In our study 1 A was diagnosed in 61% of all cases, 1B in 18%, 2 A in 16%, 2B in 5%. 50 out of 61 (82%) in group 1 A were placed within the Levinnek "safe zone". In 1B, 2 A, 2B, the position of the acetabular component was influenced by both the spinopelvic mobility and sagittal spinal balance. The mean inclination was 43.35° and the anteversion was 17.4°.

CONCLUSIONS

Categorizing patients according to Hip-Spine Classification one can identify possible consequences the patients at risk. Pathology of the spino-pelvic-hipcomplex can lead to destabilization or dislocation of hip after surgery even though implanted according to Lewinnek's indications. Our findings suggest that Lewinnek safe zone should be abandoned in favor of the concept of functional safe zones.

Variation in Functional Pelvic Tilt in Female Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty With Acetabular Dysplasia

BACKGROUND

As the pelvis is a dynamic structure, the quantification of pelvic tilt (PT) should be done in different hip positions prior to total hip arthroplasty (THA). We sought to investigate functional PT in young female patients undergoing THA and explore the correlation of PT with the extent of acetabular dysplasia. Additionally, we aimed to define the PS-SI (pubic symphysis-sacroiliac joint) index as a PT quantifier on AP pelvis X-ray.

METHODS

Pre-THA female patients under the age of 50 years (n = 678) were investigated. Functional PT in 3 positions (supine, standing, and sitting) were measured. Hip parameters including lateral center-edge angle (LCEA), Tönnis angle, head extrusion index (HEI), and femoro-epiphyseal acetabular roof (FEAR) index were correlated to PT values. The PS-SI/SI-SH (sacroiliac joint-sacral height) ratio was also correlated to PT.

RESULTS

From the 678 patients, 80% were classified as having acetabular dysplasia. Among these patients, 50.6% were bilaterally dysplastic. The mean functional PT of the entire patient group was 7.4°, 4.1°, and -1.3° in the supine, standing and seated positions. The mean functional PT of the dysplastic group was 7.4°, 4.0°, and -1.2° in the supine, standing and seated positions. The PS-SI/SI-SH ratio was found to be correlated to PT.

CONCLUSION

Most of the pre-THA patients had acetabular dysplasia and exhibited anterior PT in the supine and standing positions, most pronounced in the standing position. PT values were comparable between the dysplastic and non-dysplastic group without change with worsening dysplasia. PS-SI/SI-SH ratio can be used to easily characterize PT.

The Sacro-femoral-pubic Angle Is Unreliable to Estimate Pelvic Tilt: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The accurate measurement of pelvic tilt is critical in hip and spine surgery. A sagittal pelvic radiograph is most often used to measure pelvic tilt, but this radiograph is not always routinely obtained and does not always allow the measurement of pelvic tilt because of problems with image quality or patient characteristics (such as high BMI or the presence of a spinal deformity). Although a number of recent studies have explored the correlation between pelvic tilt and the sacro-femoral-pubic angle using AP radiographs (SFP method), which aimed to estimate pelvic tilt without a sagittal radiograph, disagreement remains about whether the SFP method is sufficiently valid and reproducible for clinical use.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the correlation between SFP and pelvic tilt in the following groups: (1) overall cohort, (2) male and female cohort, and (3) skeletally mature and immature cohorts (young and adult groups, defined as patients older or younger than 20 years). Additionally, we assessed (4) the errors of SFP-estimated pelvic tilt angles and determined (5) measurement reproducibility using the intraclass correlation coefficient.

METHODS

This meta-analysis was reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (record ID: CRD42022315673). PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science were screened in July 2022. The following keywords were used: sacral femoral pubic, sacro femoral pubic, or SFP. The exclusion criteria were nonresearch articles such as commentaries or letters and studies that only investigated relative pelvic tilt rather than absolute pelvic tilt. Although the included studies had different patient recruitment strategies, study quality-wise, they all used an adequate amount of radiographs for landmark annotation and applied a correlation analysis for the relationship between the SFP angle and pelvic tilt. Thus, no risk of bias was found. Participant differences were mitigated via subgroup and sensitivity analyses to remove outliers. Publication bias was assessed using the p value of a two-tailed Egger regression test for the asymmetry of funnel plots, as well as the Duval and Tweedie trim and fill method for potential missing publications to impute true correlations. The extracted correlation coefficients r were pooled using the Fisher Z transformation with a significance level of 0.05. Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis, totaling 1247 patients. Four studies were used in the sex-controlled subgroup analysis (312 male and 460 female patients), and all nine studies were included in the age-controlled subgroup analysis (627 adults and 620 young patients). Moreover, a sex-controlled subgroup analysis was conducted in two studies with only young cohorts (190 young male patients and 220 young female patients).

RESULTS

The overall pooled correlation coefficient between SFP and pelvic tilt was 0.61, with high interstudy heterogeneity (I 2 = 76%); a correlation coefficient of 0.61 is too low for most clinical applications. The subgroup analysis showed that the female group had a higher correlation coefficient than the male group did (0.72 versus 0.65; p = 0.03), and the adult group had a higher correlation coefficient than the young group (0.70 versus 0.56; p < 0.01). Three studies reported erroneous information about the measured pelvic tilt and calculated pelvic tilt from the SFP angle. The mean absolute error was 4.6° ± 4.5°; in one study, 78% of patients (39 of 50) were within 5° of error, and in another study, the median absolute error was 5.8º, with the highest error at 28.8° (50 female Asian patients). The intrarater intraclass correlation coefficients ranged between 0.87 and 0.97 for the SFP angle and between 0.89 and 0.92 for the pelvic tilt angle, and the interrater intraclass correlation coefficients ranged between 0.84 and 1.00 for the SFP angle and 0.76 and 0.98 for the pelvic tilt angle. However, large confidence intervals were identified, suggesting considerable uncertainty in measurement at the individual radiograph level.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis of the best-available evidence on this topic found the SFP method to be unreliable to extrapolate sagittal pelvic tilt in any patient group, and it was especially unreliable in the young male group (defined as patients younger than age 20 years). Correlation coefficients generally were too low for clinical use, but we remind readers that even a high correlation coefficient does not alone justify clinical application of a metric such as this, unless further subgroup analyses find low error and low heterogeneity, which was not the case here. Further ethnicity-segregated subgroup analyses with age, sex, and diagnosis controls could be useful in the future to determine whether there are some subgroups in which the SFP method is useful.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study.

Creating Consensus in the Definition of Spinopelvic Mobility

INTRODUCTION

The term "spinopelvic mobility" is most often applied to motion within the spinopelvic segment. It has also been used to describe changes in pelvic tilt between various functional positions, which is influenced by motion at the hip, knee, ankle and spinopelvic segment. In the interest of establishing a consistent language for spinopelvic mobility, we sought to clarify and simplify its definition to create consensus, improve communication, and increase consistency with research into the hip-spine relationship.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using the Medline (PubMed) library to identify all existing articles pertaining to spinopelvic mobility. We reported on the varying definitions of spinopelvic mobility including how different radiographic imaging techniques are used to define mobility.

RESULTS

The search term "spinopelvic mobility" returned a total of 72 articles. The frequency and context for the varying definitions of mobility were reported. 41 papers used standing and upright relaxed-seated radiographs without the use of extreme positioning, and 17 papers discussed the use of extreme positioning to define spinopelvic mobility.

DISCUSSION

Our review suggests that the definitions of spinopelvic mobility is not consistent in the majority of published literature. We suggest descriptions of spinopelvic mobility independently consider spinal motion, hip motion, and pelvic position, while recognizing and describing their interdependence.

Is It Necessary to Obtain Lateral Pelvic Radiographs in Flexed Seated Position for Preoperative Total Hip Arthroplasty Planning?

Background

Many of the current total hip arthroplasty (THA) planning tools only consider sagittal pelvic tilt in the standing and relaxed sitting positions. Considering that the risk of postoperative dislocation is higher when bending forward or in sit-to-stand move, sagittal pelvic tilt in the flexed seated position may be more relevant for preoperative planning. We hypothesized that there was a significant difference in sagittal pelvic tilt between the relaxed sitting and flexed seated positions as measured by the sacral slope in preoperative and postoperative full-body radiographs.

Methods

This was a multicenter retrospective analysis of the preoperative and postoperative simultaneous biplanar full-body radiographs of 93 primary THA patients in standing, relaxed sitting, and flexed seated positions. The sagittal pelvic tilt was measured using the sacral slope relative to the horizontal line.

Results

The mean difference between the preoperative sacral slope in the relaxed sitting position and the flexed seated position was 11.3° (-13° to 43°) (P < .0001). This difference was >10° in 52 patients (56%) and >20° in 18 patients (19.4%). The mean difference between the postoperative sacral slope in a relaxed sitting position and the sacral slope in a flexed seated position was 11.3° (P < .0001). This difference was >10° in 51 patients (54.9%) and >30° in 14 patients (15.1%) postoperatively.

Conclusions

There was a significant difference in sagittal pelvic tilt between the relaxed and flexed seated positions. A flexed seated view provides valuable information that might be more relevant for preoperative THA planning in order to prevent postoperative THA instability.

Association of age and spinopelvic function in patients receiving a total hip arthroplasty

Restricted spinopelvic mobility received attention as a contributing factor for total hip arthroplasty (THA) instability. However, it is still unknown, how the spinopelvic function is influenced by age. In identifying the patients at highest risk for altered spinopelvic mechanics the study aimed to determine the association of age on the individual segments of the spinopelvic complex and global spinal sagittal alignment in patients undergoing THA. 197 patients were included in the prospective observational study conducting biplanar stereoradiography (EOS) in standing and sitting position pre-and postoperatively. Two independent investigators assessed C7-sagittal vertical axis (C7-SVA), cervical lordosis (CL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), anterior plane pelvic tilt (APPT), and pelvic femoral angle (PFA). Key segments of the spinopelvic complex are defined as lumbar flexibility (∆ LL = LL_standing - LL_sitting), pelvic mobility (∆ SS = SS_standing - SS_sitting) and hip motion (∆ PFA = PFA_standing - PFA_sitting). Pelvic mobility was further defined based on ∆ SS = SS_standing - SS_sitting as stiff (∆ SS < 10°), normal (∆ SS ≥ 10°-30°) and hypermobile (∆ SS > 30°). The patient collective was classified into three groups: (1) < 60 years (n = 56), (2) ≥ 60-79 years (n = 112) and (3) ≥ 80 years (n = 29). Lumbar flexibility (∆ LL) was decreased with increasing age between all groups (36.1° vs. 23.1° vs. 17.2°/p₁₊₂ < 0.000, p₂₊₃ = 0.020, p₁₊₃ < 0.000) postoperatively. Pelvic mobility (∆ SS) was decreased in the groups 2 and 3 compared to group 1 (21.0° and 17.9° vs. 27.8°/p₁₊₂ < 0.000, p₂₊₃ = 0.371, p₁₊₃ = 0.001). Pelvic retroversion in standing position (APPT) was higher in group 2 and 3 compared to group 1 (1.9° and - 0.5° vs 6.9°/p₁₊₂ < 0.000, p₂₊₃ = 0.330, p₁₊₃ < 0.000). Global sagittal spinal balance (C7-SVA) showed more imbalance in groups 2 and 3 compared to group 1 (60.4 mm and 71.2 mm vs. 34.5 mm/p₁₊₂ < 0.000, p₂₊₃ = 0.376, p₁₊₃ < 0.000) postoperatively. The preoperative proportion of patients with stiff pelvic mobility in group 1 was distinctly lower than in group 3 (23.2% vs. 35.7%) and declined in group 1 to 1.8% compared to 20.7% in group 3 after THA. Changes after THA were reported for groups 1 and 2 representing spinopelvic complex key parameter lumbar flexibility (∆ LL), pelvic mobility (∆ SS) and hip motion (∆ PFA), but not for group 3. This is the first study to present age-adjusted normative values for spinopelvic mobility. The subgroups with increased age were identified as risk cohort for altered spinopelvic mechanics and enhanced sagittal spinal imbalance and limited capacity for improvement of mobility after THA. This valuable information serves to focus in the preoperative screening on the THA candidates with the highest risk for abnormal spinopelvic function.

Does Total Hip Arthroplasty Affect Spinopelvic and Spinal Alignment?: A Prospective Observational Investigation

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective observational study, level of evidence 3.

OBJECTIVES

The study with patients undergoing unilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) aimed to evaluate the following hypotheses: (1) the spinal sagittal and coronal alignment alters due to THA, (2) the spinopelvic parameter changes after THA, (3) the spinopelvic alignment differs between sagittal balanced and imbalanced patients.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Surgical correction of spinal sagittal misalignment affects the spinopelvic alignment and pelvic tilt. It is not yet known to what extent THA affects spinopelvic, spinal sagittal, and coronal alignment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 153 patients undergoing THA were assessed with biplanar stereoradiography in standing position preoperatively and postoperatively. Two independent investigators examined C7-sagittal vertical axis (C7-SVA), pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch, lumbar lordosis (LL), C7-central sacral vertical line, pelvic oblique angle lumbosacral, intra-pelvic oblique angle, pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), anterior plane pelvic tilt (APPT), and pelvic femoral angle (PFA). An analysis of the sagittal misaligned subgroups of C7-SVA and PI-LL on the influence of the spinopelvic alignment was performed.

RESULTS

A significant difference in spinopelvic parameters was detected in the preoperative to postoperative comparison (SS, PT, APPT, and PFA; P <0.000) ( d =-0.394; d =0.609; d =-0.481; d =0.431). The coronal alignment and pelvic obliquity revealed no significant differences. The misaligned groups (C7-SVA; PI-LL) demonstrated significant increases in PI and PT and decreased in LL compared with the groups with normal sagittal alignment. Preoperatively, 66/153 (C7-SVA) and 46/153 (PI-LL) of the THA patients presented sagittal misalignment, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest an effect of THA on sagittal spinal and spinopelvic alignment, with a significant reduction of PT postoperatively and no effect on coronal alignment. Particularly striking are the significant differences in the misaligned groups, which may be classified as risk population and potentially can contribute biomechanically to a higher risk of posterior impingement and anterior THA dislocation. The substantial proportion of sagittal misaligned patients in the THA collective illustrates the crucial need for interdisciplinary collaboration.

Risk Factors for Progressive Spinal Sagittal Imbalance in the Short-Term Course after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A 3 Year Follow-Up Study of Female Patients

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) for patients with hip osteoarthritis improves hip flexion contracture, subsequently improving spinal sagittal balance. However, in some cases, spinal sagittal imbalance develops in the course after THA, and its risk factors remain unknown. We aimed to investigate the risk factors of progressive spinal sagittal imbalance after THA. This retrospective cohort study of a prospectively maintained database included female patients aged ≥50 years who underwent THA. Before performing THA, we obtained each patient’s anthropometric and muscle strength measurements and whole-spine radiographs. Three years postoperatively, patients underwent whole-spine radiography to examine changes in the spinal sagittal balance. Patients were assigned into groups on the basis of their preoperative and 3 year postoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA) values. Patients with 3 year postoperative SVA values ≥40 mm with an increase ≥30 mm were categorized into the imbalance group; the other patients were categorized into the non-imbalance group. Of 103 patients, 11 (10.7%) were in the imbalance group. In multiple logistic regression analysis, preoperative weak abdominal trunk muscle strength (ATMS) (p = 0.007) and small sacral slope (SS) (p = 0.005) were significant risk factors for progressive spinal sagittal imbalance. In conclusion, risk factors for progressive spinal sagittal imbalance after THA were weak preoperative ATMS and small SS.

Effect of Coronal and Sagittal Spinal Malalignment on Spinopelvic Mobility in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Replacement: A Prospective Observational Study

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE

This investigation aimed (1) to determine the impact of sagittal spinal alignment with C7-sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch and Roussouly classification on individual segments of spinopelvic mobility represented by lumbar flexibility [∆lumbar lordosis (LL)], pelvic mobility [∆pelvic tilt (PT)], and hip motion [∆pelvic femoral angle (PFA)] and (2) to assess the influence of coronal spinal balance on the spinopelvic complex in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) preoperatively and postoperatively.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Restricted spinopelvic mobility gained attention as a contributing factor for THA instability. However, it remains unclear what influence the coronal and sagittal spinal alignment has on spinopelvic mobility.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 197 THA patients were included in the investigation conducting biplanar stereoradiography in standing and sitting position preoperatively and postoperatively. Two independent investigators assessed C7-SVA (≤50 mm balanced, >50 mm imbalanced), PI-LL (≤10 degrees balanced, >10 degrees imbalanced), refounded Roussouly classification, coronal spinal balance with C7-central sacral vertical line, LL, pelvic incidence (PI), PT, PFA. Individual segments of spinopelvic mobility based on the change from standing to sitting were defined as ∆LL, ∆PT, and ∆PFA. Unpaired t test or Welch t test for comparison between groups of 2 was applied. Analysis of variance and post hoc analysis according to Bonferroni or Games-Howell was used to determine differences between groups of >2. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to determine the interrater reliability of the radiographic measurements.

RESULTS

Significant differences were demonstrated for ∆LL (SVA balanced/imbalanced: 24.7 degrees/19.1 degrees, P =0.001; PI-LL balanced/imbalanced: 24.4 degrees/16.4 degrees, P <0.000), PT (SVA balanced/imbalanced: 12.5 degrees/15.2 degrees, P =0.029; PI-LL balanced/imbalanced: 10.8 degrees/20.5 degrees, P <0.000), PI (SVA balanced/imbalanced: 52.9 degrees/56.9 degrees, P =0.001; PI-LL balanced/imbalanced: 52.1 degrees/61.0 degrees, P <0.000), LL (SVA balanced/imbalanced: 54.8 degrees/47.8 degrees, P =0.029; PI-LL balanced/imbalanced: 55.3 degrees/42.6 degrees, P <0.000). The coronal spinal balance (central sacral vertical line) indicated no significant differences regarding spinopelvic mobility between positive, neutral, or negative balanced groups. Significant differences with decreased pelvic mobility (∆PT) and lumbar flexibility (∆LL) in low-grade PI types 1 and 2 compared with high-grade PI type 4 according to the Roussouly classification were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to investigate spinal sagittal alignment using 3 different classifications in association to the spinopelvic complex in THA patients preoperatively and postoperatively. The significantly altered spinopelvic mechanics with decreased lumbar flexibility and increased pelvic retroversion in sagittal imbalanced patients clearly indicate the need for a separate consideration of the global spinal sagittal alignment. Our findings emphasize the importance of risk stratification for THA candidates in terms of sagittal imbalance attempting to mitigate the THA instability risk with accurate preoperative planning.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

The significant relationship among the factors of pelvic incidence, standing lumbar lordosis, and lumbar flexibility in Japanese patients with hip osteoarthritis: A descriptive radiographic study

INTRODUCTION

Spine stiffness is known to increase the risk of total hip replacement (THR) instability. The sagittal posture and lumbo-pelvic kinematics have therefore become parameters of interest when planning THR. We conducted this study to investigate (1) the distribution and characteristics of the spino-pelvic standing alignment, (2) the relationship between pelvic incidence (PI) and standing lumbar lordosis (LL) and lumbar flexibility, in Japanese hip osteoarthritis patients.

HYPOTHESIS

(1) Japanese hip osteoarthritis patients with different sagittal spino-pelvic alignments do not differ markedly in their demographics, PI, or lumbar flexibility; and (2) there is no significant relationship between PI, standing LL, and lumbar flexibility in a population of Japanese hip osteoarthritis patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective study of radiographs from 945 Japanese patients who consecutively received THR for the treatment of hip osteoarthritis. All patients pre-operatively underwent lateral standing and deep-seated lumbo-pelvic radiography on which the spino-pelvic parameters were measured. The difference between the standing and deep-seated LL angles defined the lumbar flexibility and was calculated as the delta (Δ) LL. Individual spino-pelvic standing alignment was stratified based on the difference between the PI and standing LL ('PI-LL mismatch'). 'PI-LL mismatch' of<-10°, between -10° and 10°, and>10° was defined as hyperlordosis, normolordosis, and flatback, respectively.

RESULTS

In the present study, the spinal alignment of 115/945 (12.2%), 559/945 (59.2%), and 271/945 (28.6%) patients were classified as hyperlordosis, normolordosis, and flatback, respectively. Hyperlordotic patients had significantly lower PI (47.6°±7.8° vs. 52.7°±10.5°, p<0.001) and higher ΔLL (60.6°±12.6° vs. 51.6°±12.8°, p<0.001) than normolordotic patients. Patients with flatback were significantly older (age, 69.1±9.1 years vs. 62.7±9.8 years, p<0.001) with higher PI (56.9°±11.7° vs. 52.7°±10.5°, p<0.001) and lower ΔLL (35.2°±17.4° vs. 51.6°±12.8°, p<0.001) than normolordotic patients. A significant relationship between PI and the standing LL was found in the whole cohort (r=0.409, p=0.009), hyperlordotic (r=0.785, p<0.001), normolordotic (r=0.857, p<0.001), and flatback (r=0.664, p<0.001) patients. Significant relationships between the PI and ΔLL were also found in normolordotic (r=0.442, p=0.004) and flatback (r=0.449, p=0.003) patients but not hyperlordotic patients (r=0.154, p=0.367).

DISCUSSION

A large proportion of Japanese hip osteoarthritis patients have abnormal PI-LL mismatch (12% and 29% have hyperlordosis and flatback, respectively). The PI was a determinant of the standing LL and the lumbar flexibility, especially in the normolordotic and flatback individuals.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; retrospective diagnostic radiographic study.

Pelvic incidence significance relative to spinopelvic risk factors for total hip arthroplasty instability

AIMS

Pelvic incidence (PI) is a position-independent spinopelvic parameter traditionally used by spinal surgeons to determine spinal alignment. Its relevance to the arthroplasty surgeon in assessing patient risk for total hip arthroplasty (THA) instability preoperatively is unclear. This study was undertaken to investigate the significance of PI relative to other spinopelvic parameter risk factors for instability to help guide its clinical application.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was performed of a multicentre THA database of 9,414 patients with preoperative imaging (dynamic spinopelvic radiographs and pelvic CT scans). Several spinopelvic parameter measurements were made by engineers using advanced software including sacral slope (SS), standing anterior pelvic plane tilt (APPT), spinopelvic tilt (SPT), lumbar lordosis (LL), and PI. Lumbar flexion (LF) was determined by change in LL between standing and flexed-seated lateral radiographs. Abnormal pelvic mobility was defined as ∆SPT ≥ 20° between standing and flexed-forward positions. Sagittal spinal deformity (SSD) was defined as PI-LL mismatch > 10°.

RESULTS

PI showed a positive correlation with parameters of SS, SPT, and LL (r-value range 0.468 to 0.661). Patients with a higher PI value showed higher degrees of standing LL, likely as a compensatory measure to maintain sagittal spine balance. There was a positive correlation between LL and LF such that patients with less standing LL had decreased LF (r = 0.49). Similarly, there was a positive correlation between increased SSD and decreased LF (r = 0.54). PI in isolation did not show any significant correlation with lumbar (r = 0.04) or pelvic mobility (r = 0.02). The majority of patients (range 89.4% to 94.2%) had normal lumbar and pelvic mobility regardless of the PI value.

CONCLUSION

The PI value alone is not indicative of either spinal or pelvic mobility, and thus in isolation may not be a risk factor for THA instability. Patients with SSD had higher rates of spinopelvic stiffness, which may be the mechanism by which PI relates to THA instability risk, but further clinical studies are required. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(3):352-358.

Assessing Pelvic Tilt in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Sensor Technology

Background

The purpose of our study was to assess the accuracy of a commercially available wearable sensor in replicating pelvic tilt movement in both the sitting and standing position in patients before total hip arthroplasty.

Methods

This prospective study evaluated patients undergoing a primary unilateral total hip arthroplasty by a single surgeon. Patients were excluded if they had a body mass index (BMI) greater than 40 kg/m². Two sensors were adhered directly to patients’ skin at S2 and T12. The S2 angle was recorded on the sensor at maximum flexion and extension angles and compared with pelvic tilt measurements on both sitting and standing radiographs. The primary outcomes recorded were patients’ pelvic tilts measured using radiographs (PT-RAD) and sensors (PT-SEN), with Pearson correlation coefficients and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) calculated.

Results

Sixty-one patients (35 males and 26 females) with an average age of 61.5 ± 8.5 years and BMI of 26.9 ± 4.1 kg/m² were analyzed. The mean prestanding PT-RAD and PT-SEN were 1.5 ± 8.3 and 1.0 ± 8.1, respectively, with an ICC of 0.98 (95% confidence interval, 0.96-0.99). The mean presitting PT-RAD and PT-SEN were -21.9 ± 12.5 and -20.9 ± 11.7, respectively, with an ICC of 0.97 (95% confidence interval, 0.95-0.98). The multiple R² was 0.95 for the prestanding and presitting comparisons. The R² for all comparisons between PT-RAD and PT-SEN was >0.85, regardless of BMI or sex.

Conclusions

Although the use of wearable technology may have limitations, based on our results, a wearable sensor is accurate in replicating pelvic tilt movement.

How much change in pelvic sagittal tilt can result in hip dislocation due to prosthetic impingement? A computer simulation study

Developing spinal pathologies and spinal fusion after total hip arthroplasty (THA) can result in increased pelvic retroversion (e.g., flat back deformity) or increased anterior pelvic tilt (caused by spinal stenosis, spinal fusion or other pathologies) while bending forward. This change in sagittal pelvic tilt (SPT) can result in prosthetic impingement and dislocation. Our aim was to determine the magnitude of SPT change that could lead to prosthetic impingement. We hypothesized that the magnitude of SPT change that could lead to THA dislocation is less than 10° and it varies for different hip motions. Hip motion was simulated in standing, sitting, sit-to-stand, bending forward, squatting and pivoting in Matlab software. The implant orientations and SPT angle were modified by 1° increments. The risk of prosthetic impingement in pivoting caused by increased pelvic retroversion (reciever operating characteristic [ROC] threshold as low as 1-3°) is higher than the risk of prosthetic impingement with increased pelvic anteversion (ROC threshold as low as 16-18°). Larger femoral heads decrease the risk of prosthetic impingement (odds ratio {OR}: 0.08 [932 mm head]; OR: 0.01 [36 mm head]; OR: 0.002 [40 mm head]). Femoral stems with a higher neck-shaft angle decrease the prosthetic impingement due to SPT change in motions requiring hip flexion (OR: 1.16 [132° stem]; OR: 4.94 [135° stem]). Our results show that overall, the risk of prosthetic impingement due to SPT change is low. In particular, this risk is very low when a larger diameter head is used and femoral offset and length are recreated to prevent bone on bone impingement.

Does obesity affect acetabular cup position, spinopelvic function and sagittal spinal alignment? A prospective investigation with standing and sitting assessment of primary hip arthroplasty patients

Background

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) instability is influenced by acetabular component positioning, spinopelvic function and sagittal spinal alignment. Obesity is considered as a risk factor of THA instability, but the causal relationship remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the influence of BMI on (1) spinopelvic function (lumbar flexibility, pelvic mobility and hip motion), (2) sagittal spinal alignment pre- and postoperatively and (3) acetabular cup position postoperatively in primary THA patients in a prospective setting.

Methods

One hundred ninety patients receiving primary total hip arthroplasty were enrolled in a prospective cohort study and retrospectively analysed. All patients received stereoradiography (EOS) in standing and relaxed sitting position pre-and postoperatively. C7-sagittal vertical axis (C7-SVA), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), anterior plane pelvic tilt (APPT), and pelvic femoral angle (PFA) were assessed. Key parameters of the spinopelvic function were defined as lumbar flexibility (∆ LL = LL_standing − LL_sitting), pelvic mobility (∆ PT = PT_standing − PT_sitting) and hip motion (∆ PFA = PFA_standing − PFA_sitting). Pelvic mobility was further defined based on ∆ PT as stiff, normal and hypermobile (∆ PT < 10°; 10°–30°; > 30°). The patients were stratified to BMI according to WHO definition: normal BMI ≥ 18.5–24.9 kg/m² (n = 68), overweight ≥ 25.0–29.9 kg/m² (n = 81) and obese ≥ 30–39.9 kg/m² (n = 41). Post-hoc analysis according to Hochberg's GT2 was applied to determine differences between BMI groups.

Results

Standing cup inclination was significant higher in the obese group compared to the normal BMI group (45.3° vs. 40.1°; p = 0.015) whereas standing cup anteversion was significantly decreased (22.0° vs. 25.3°; p = 0.011). There were no significant differences for spinopelvic function key parameter lumbar flexibility (∆ LL), pelvic mobility (∆ PT) and hip motion (∆ PFA) in relation to BMI stratified groups. The obese group demonstrated significant enhanced pelvic retroversion compared to the normal BMI group (APPT − 1.8° vs. 2.4°; p = 0.028). The preoperative proportion of stiff pelvic mobility was decreased in the obese group (12.2%) compared to normal (25.0%) and overweight (27.2%) groups. Spinal sagittal alignment in C7-SVA and PI-LL mismatch demonstrated significantly greater imbalance in the obese group compared to the normal BMI group (68.6 mm vs. 42.6 mm, p = 0.002 and 7.7° vs. 1.2°, p = 0.032, respectively) The proportion of patients with imbalanced C7-SVA was higher in the obese (58.5%) than in the normal BMI group (44.1%).

Conclusions

The significantly increased spinal sagittal imbalance with altered pelvic mechanics is a potential cause for the reported increased risk of THA dislocations in obese patients. Consequently, the increased spinal sagittal imbalance in combination with normal pelvic mobility need to be taken into account when performing THA in obese patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-021-02716-8.

Spinopelvic Biomechanics and Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Primer for Clinical Practice

Abnormal spinopelvic motion from spine pathology is associated with inferior outcomes after total hip arthroplasty, including inferior patient-reported outcomes, increased rates of instability, and higher revision rates. Identifying these high-risk patients preoperatively is important to conduct the appropriate workup and formulate a surgical plan. Standing and sitting lateral spinopelvic radiographs are able to identify and quantify abnormal spinopelvic motion. Depending on the type of spinopelvic deformity, some patients may require increased anteversion, increased offset, and large diameter heads or dual mobility articulations to prevent dislocation. This review article will provide the reader with practical information that can be applied to patients regarding the terminology, pathophysiology, evaluation, and management of total hip arthroplasty patients with spinopelvic pathology.

Low dislocation rates with the use of patient specific "Safe zones" in total hip arthroplasty

Introduction

The purpose of this study was to compare patient-specific acetabular cup target orientation using functional simulation to the Lewinnek Safe Zone (LSZ) and determine associated rates of postoperative dislocation.

Methods

A retrospective review of 1500 consecutive primary THAs was performed. Inclination, anteversion, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, lumbar flexion, and dislocation rates were recorded.

Results

56% of dynamically planned cups were within LSZ (p < 0.05). 6/1500 (0.4%) of these cups dislocated at two year follow-up, and all were within LSZ.

Conclusion

Optimal acetabular cup positioning using dynamic imaging differs significantly from historical target parameters but results in low rates of dislocation.

Level of evidence

Level III: Retrospective.

L5 Vertebral Column Resection for Correction of Severe Lumbar Hyperlordosis and Pelvic Anteversion in an Adolescent With Prior Myelomeningocele Repair and Lumbar Fusion: Case Report

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE

Lumbar hyperlordosis in ambulatory children is an uncommon but potentially problematic spinal deformity, and the operative management has not been comprehensively described.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

We report the case of a 14-yr-old girl presenting with severe progressive lumbar hyperlordosis (-122°) and sagittal imbalance (-6 cm). She had multiple prior surgeries, including myelomeningocele repair at 10 d old, midlumbar meningioma resection at 8 mo old, and posterior lumbar instrumented spinal fusion at 5 yr old. She presented with progressive lumbosacral back pain and intermittent numbness in her left lower extremity, and severe skin contractures over her prior posterior incisions. From an all posterior approach, prior implants and dural scar were removed and then an L5 vertebral column resection (VCR) was performed to disarticulate her lumbar spine from her anteverted pelvis, allowing for slow distraction forces to correct her lumbar hyperlordosis. This was followed by a T7-sacrum fusion using pedicle screws and iliac screws, with autologous bone graft and plastic surgery wound closure. Postoperatively, lumbar lordosis was corrected to -55° and sagittal balance reduced to -0.5 cm. At 10-wk and 14-mo follow-ups, the patient reported resolution of her back pain with no limitations in physical activities. Dramatic improvement was seen in both her preoperative to 14-mo postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (54 to 12) and Scoliosis Research Society Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22r (54 to 93) scores.

CONCLUSION

This case highlights a rare presentation of severe progressive lumbar hyperlordosis in an ambulatory adolescent after myelomeningocele repair, meningioma resection, and posterior lumbar instrumented spinal fusion with subsequent surgical treatment incorporating important components of both spinal and plastic surgery involvement.

Spinopelvic mobility affects accuracy of acetabular anteversion measurements on cross-table lateral radiographs

AIMS

Cross-table lateral (CTL) radiographs are commonly used to measure acetabular component anteversion after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The CTL measurements may differ by > 10° from CT scan measurements but the reasons for this discrepancy are poorly understood. Anteversion measurements from CTL radiographs and CT scans are compared to identify spinopelvic parameters predictive of inaccuracy.

METHODS

THA patients (n = 47; 27 males, 20 females; mean age 62.9 years (SD 6.95)) with preoperative spinopelvic mobility, radiological analysis, and postoperative CT scans were retrospectively reviewed. Acetabular component anteversion was measured on postoperative CTL radiographs and CT scans using 3D reconstructions of the pelvis. Two cohorts were identified based on a CTL-CT error of ≥ 10° (n = 11) or < 10° (n = 36). Spinopelvic mobility parameters were compared using independent-samples t-tests. Correlation between error and mobility parameters were assessed with Pearson's coefficient.

RESULTS

Patients with CTL error > 10° (10° to 14°) had stiffer lumbar spines with less mean lumbar flexion (38.9°(SD 11.6°) vs 47.4° (SD 13.1°); p = 0.030), different sagittal balance measured by pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch (5.9° (SD 18.8°) vs -1.7° (SD 9.8°); p = 0.042), more pelvic extension when seated (pelvic tilt -9.7° (SD 14.1°) vs -2.2° (SD 13.2°); p = 0.050), and greater change in pelvic tilt between supine and seated positions (12.6° (SD 12.1°) vs 4.7° (SD 12.5°); p = 0.036). The CTL measurement error showed a positive correlation with increased CTL anteversion (r = 0.5; p = 0.001), standing lordosis (r = 0.23; p = 0.050), seated lordosis (r = 0.4; p = 0.009), and pelvic tilt change between supine and step-up positions (r = 0.34; p = 0.010).

CONCLUSION

Differences in spinopelvic mobility may explain the variability of acetabular anteversion measurements made on CTL radiographs. Patients with stiff spines and increased compensatory pelvic movement have less accurate measurements on CTL radiographs. Flexion of the contralateral hip is required to obtain clear CTL radiographs. In patients with lumbar stiffness, this movement may extend the pelvis and increase anteversion of the acetabulum on CTL views. Reliable analysis of acetabular component anteversion in this patient population may require advanced imaging with a CT scan. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(7 Supple B):59-65.

2021 Otto Aufranc Award: A simple Hip-Spine Classification for total hip arthroplasty : validation and a large multicentre series

AIMS

Patients with spinal pathology who undergo total hip arthroplasty (THA) have an increased risk of dislocation and revision. The aim of this study was to determine if the use of the Hip-Spine Classification system in these patients would result in a decreased rate of postoperative dislocation in patients with spinal pathology.

METHODS

This prospective, multicentre study evaluated 3,777 consecutive patients undergoing THA by three surgeons, between January 2014 and December 2019. They were categorized using The Hip-Spine Classification system: group 1 with normal spinal alignment; group 2 with a flatback deformity, group 2A with normal spinal mobility, and group 2B with a stiff spine. Flatback deformity was defined by a pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis of > 10°, and spinal stiffness was defined by < 10° change in sacral slope from standing to seated. Each category determined a patient-specific component positioning. Survivorship free of dislocation was recorded and spinopelvic measurements were compared for reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

A total of 2,081 patients met the inclusion criteria. There were 987 group 1A, 232 group 1B, 715 group 2A, and 147 group 2B patients. A total of 70 patients had a lumbar fusion, most had L4-5 (16; 23%) or L4-S1 (12; 17%) fusions; 51 patients (73%) had one or two levels fused, and 19 (27%) had > three levels fused. Dual mobility (DM) components were used in 166 patients (8%), including all of those in group 2B and with > three level fusions. Survivorship free of dislocation at five years was 99.2% with a 0.8% dislocation rate. The correlation coefficient was 0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.89 to 0.91).

CONCLUSION

This is the largest series in the literature evaluating the relationship between hip-spine pathology and dislocation after THA, and guiding appropriate treatment. The Hip-Spine Classification system allows surgeons to make appropriate evaluations preoperatively, and it guides the use of DM components in patients with spinopelvic pathology in order to reduce the risk of dislocation in these high-risk patients. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(7 Supple B):17-24.

The Hip-Spine Relationship in Total Hip Arthroplasty: How to Execute the Plan

BACKGROUND

Patients with spinopelvic pathology, including lumbar spine stiffness and sagittal spinal deformity, are at increased risk for postoperative complications, including instability, dislocation, and revision after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Recent evidence has suggested that the Lewinnek safe zone should no longer be considered an appropriate target for all patients, especially those with spinopelvic pathology, as the safe zone is a dynamic rather than static target. There are 2 distinct issues for arthroplasty surgeons to consider: lumbar spinal stiffness and sagittal spinal deformity, each of which has its own management.

METHODS

In order to manage patients with spinopelvic pathology undergoing THA, a basic understanding of spinopelvic parameters, including sagittal balance, sacral slope, and anterior pelvic plane, is essential. Techniques outlined in this manuscript describe a systematic preoperative work-up and intraoperative management of acetabular component positioning according to patient-specific spinopelvic parameters, ensuring optimal component placement and a reduced risk for impingement, instability, and poor postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Evaluation of each patient's spinopelvic parameters informs patient classification according to the Hip-Spine Classification for THA. Patient classification is determined by the presence of spinal stiffness and spinal deformity, with corresponding scoring and classification into one of the 4 categories used to determine risk for postoperative dislocation, define patient-specific cup positioning, and create their functional safe zone.

CONCLUSION

A simple 2-step preoperative assessment with measurements of the anterior pelvic plane and the sacral slope on standing and seated lateral X-rays will identify patients at high risk for postoperative dislocation due to spinal deformity and/or stiffness. Accounting for spinopelvic pathology and adhering to the Hip-Spine Classification guidelines for acetabular component positioning can help reduce the burden of instability and revisions in this complex patient population.

The relationship between pelvic incidence and anatomical acetabular anteversion in female Japanese patients with hip osteoarthritis: a retrospective iconographic study

PURPOSE

This study aimed (1) to investigate the relationship between pelvic incidence (PI) and the anatomical acetabular anteversion (AA) relative to the spino-pelvic tilt (SPT) plane (anatomical AASPT), relative to the anterior pelvic plane (anatomical AAAPP), and functional standing AA; and (2) to compare AA and the sagittal spino-pelvic parameters of lumbo-pelvic complex types 1 (PI ≤ 30°) and 2 (PI > 30°), in Japanese females with hip osteoarthritis.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study on 110 Japanese females with unilateral hip osteoarthritis. PI, standing lumbar lordosis (LL), standing SPT, anatomical AASPT, anatomical AAAPP, and functional standing AA were measured and calculated using radiographs and computed tomography. The PI-LL difference was defined as the mathematical difference between the PI and standing LL angles. Pearson's correlation test was used to measure the relationship between the PI and AA. Student's t test was used to compare spino-pelvic parameters between lumbo-pelvic complex type 1 (n = 24) and type 2 (n = 86).

RESULTS

There was a significant relationship between the PI and anatomical AASPT (r =  -0.532, p < 0.001), but no significant relationship between the PI and anatomical AAAPP (r =  -0.021, p = 0.824) or functional standing AA (r = 0.104, p = 0.299). Lumbo-pelvic complex type 1 had a higher anatomical AASPT (22.4° ± 9.1° vs. 5.4° ± 15.1°, p < 0.001), similar anatomical AAAPP (15.0° ± 10.6° vs. 15.1° ± 15.3°, p = 0.981) and functional standing AA (12.4° ± 8.0° vs. 15.0° ± 14.1°, p = 0.254), a lower standing SPT (- 14.3° ± 11.0° vs. 13.7° ± 12.6°, p < 0.001), and a lower PI-LL difference (- 14.4° ± 18.5° vs. 6.4° ± 17.1°, p < 0.001) in comparison to lumbo-pelvic complex type 2.

CONCLUSION

Our findings will help to improve the understanding of hip anatomy and its relationship with the standing spino-pelvic alignment in Japanese females with hip osteoarthritis.

The Effect of a Degenerative Spine and Adverse Pelvic Mobility on Prosthetic Impingement in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Despite the placement of acetabular components in the traditional "safe-zone", dislocations and all parts of the instability spectrum, including impingement, continue to be an issue. Recent research has established the importance of a degenerative spine and adverse pelvic mobility on functional acetabular orientation. The purpose of this study is to quantify the clinical consequences of a degenerative spine and adverse pelvic mobility on prosthetic impingement in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

Between January 2018 and December 2019, a series of 1592 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty had functional lateral radiographs and a computed tomography scan taken. Two spinal parameters and 2 pelvic mobility parameters were investigated for their association with impingement. Each patient was evaluated for anterior and posterior impingement, at all orientations within a traditional supine safe zone and a patient-specific functional safe zone.

RESULTS

Patients with limited lumbar flexion (stiff spine), higher pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch (sagittal imbalance), and more anterior pelvic mobility from stand to flexed-seated, exhibit increased anterior impingement. Patients with larger posterior pelvic mobility from supine-to-stand exhibited increased posterior impingement. Impingement was reduced 3-fold when the target cup orientation was tailored to a patient's functional safe zone rather than a generic target. Six percent of patients showed unavoidable impingement even with an optimized functional cup orientation.

CONCLUSION

Our results support growing evidence that patients with a degenerative spine and adverse pelvic mobility are likely to have unfavorable functional cup orientations, resulting in prosthetic impingement. Preoperative functional radiographic screening is recommended to assess the likelihood of a patient experiencing impingement due to their unique spinopelvic mobility.

Prevalence of Risk Factors for Adverse Spinopelvic Mobility Among Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Patients with adverse spinopelvic mobility have higher complication rates following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Risk factors include a stiff lumbar spine, standing posterior pelvic tilt ≤ -10°, and a severe sagittal spinal deformity (pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis mismatch ≥20°). The purpose of this study is to define the spinopelvic risk factors and quantify the prevalence of risk factors for pathologic spinopelvic mobility.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis from January 2014 to February 2020 was performed on a multicenter series of 9414 primary THAs by 168 surgeons, all with preoperative spinopelvic measurements in the supine, standing, and flex-seated positions. All patients were included. The prevalence of adverse spinopelvic mobility and frequency of each spinopelvic risk factor was calculated.

RESULTS

The cohort was 52% female, 48% male, with an average age of 65 years. Thirteen percent of patients exhibited adverse spinopelvic mobility and 17% had one or more of the 3 risk factors. Adverse mobility was found in 35% of patients with at least 1 risk factor, 47% with at least 2 risk factors, and 57% with all 3 risk factors.

CONCLUSION

Forty-six percent of patients had spinopelvic pathology driven by one or more of the risk factors. Number of risk factors present and risk of adverse spinopelvic mobility were positively correlated, with 57% of patients with all 3 risk factors exhibiting adverse spinopelvic mobility. Although this study defines the prevalence of these risk factors in this highly selected cohort, it does not report incidence in a general THA population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level IV.

Association of global sagittal spinal deformity with functional disability two years after total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The relationship between spinopelvic alignment and functional disability after total hip arthroplasty (THA) has not been fully elucidated despite the growing recognition of its importance on patient-reported outcome measures. Therefore, our aim was to assess the effect of global sagittal spinal deformity on post-operative disability.

METHODS

This analysis was based on 208 cases of THA, with functional disability measured at a follow-up of 2 years. The Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Joint Replacement (HOOS-JR), ranging from a scale of 0 (complete joint disability) to 100 (perfect joint health), was used to divide eligible patients into two groups, namely with and without disability, using a score of 70 as the cut-off. The following factors were compared between the two groups using multivariate analysis: age, sex, body height, body mass index, spinopelvic parameters, and surgeon experience. To identify the cut-off value of the parameters for predicting disability (HOOS-JR < 70/100), we used the receiver-operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

The disability (30 hips) and control (178 hips) groups showed a significant difference in pre-operative body height (p = 0.020), T1 pelvic angle divided by pelvic incidence (T1PA/PI; p = 0.018), PI minus lumbar lordosis (p = 0.027), post-operative HOOS-JR (p = 0.010), patient satisfaction (p = 0.033), and the modified Harris Hip Score (p = 0.038). On multivariate analysis, the following factors were associated with persistent disability: T1PA/PI > 0.2 (odds ratio [OR], 2.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19-4.14; p <  0.001) and height < 148 cm equivalent to legal standards as short stature (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.09-1.48; p = 0.011). The cut-off value of pre-operative T1PA/PI was > 0.19, with a sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 85%. Post-operative satisfaction (p <  0.001), HOOS-JR (p = 0.023), and EuroQol 5-Dimension (p = 0.041) differed between the two groups when the pre-operative cut-off value was chosen as 0.2.

CONCLUSIONS

A T1PA/PI > 0.2 was associated with greater disability after THA. Clinicians should be aware that patient-related factors, including global spinal deformities, particularly in patients with a short stature, can influence THA outcomes at 2 years postoperatively.

High Offset Stems Are Protective of Dislocation in High-Risk Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Spinal stiffness has been shown to increase risk of dislocation due to impingement and instability. Increasing anteversion of the acetabular component has been suggested to prevent dislocation, but little has been discussed in terms of femoral or global offset restoration. The purpose of this study is to quantify dislocation rates after primary THA using standard versus high-offset femoral components and to determine how differences in offset affect impingement-free range of motion in a stiff spine cohort using a novel impingement model.

METHODS

A total of 12,365 patients undergoing THA from 2016 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed to determine dislocation rates and utilization of standard- versus high-offset stems. For 50 consecutive patients with spinal stiffness, a CT-based computer software impingement modeling system assessed bony or prosthetic impingement during simulated range of motion. The model was run 5 times for each patient with varying offsets. Range of motion was simulated in each scenario to determine the degree at which impingement occurred.

RESULTS

There were 51 dislocations for a 0.41% dislocation rate. Total utilization of high-offset stems in the entire cohort was 49%. Of those patients who sustained a dislocation, 49 (96%) utilized a standard-offset stem. The impingement modeling demonstrated 5 degrees of added range of motion until impingement for every 1 mm offset increase.

CONCLUSION

In the impingement model, high-offset stems facilitated greater ROM before bony impingement and resulted in lower dislocation rates. In the setting of high-risk THA due to spinal stiffness, surgeons should consider the use of high-offset stems and pay attention to offset restoration.

Can Dislocation Rates Be Decreased Using the Anterior Approach in Patients With Lumbar Spondylosis or Lumbar Instrumented Fusion?

BACKGROUND

Although spinopelvic stiffness is known to contribute to instability following total hip arthroplasty (THA), it is unknown whether use of an anterior surgical approach is associated with decreased postoperative instability rates in patients with lumbar spondylosis or fusion.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of 1750 patients who underwent primary THA at our institution over an 8-year time period. Radiographic and chart review was performed evaluating for dislocations. Lumbar and pelvic radiographs were used to identify the presence of spondylosis and/or instrumented fusion. Patients were then divided into non-spondylosis and spondylosis or fusion groups to compare dislocation rates by surgical approach.

RESULTS

In total, 54.4% of THA patients had an anterior approach (n = 952) and 54.6% had lumbar spondylosis or instrumented fusion (n = 956). There were 29 dislocations in total (1.7%), with less occurring in anterior approach patients (0.6% vs 2.9%, P < .001). In the patients without lumbar spondylosis, there were less dislocations in the anterior approach group (0.2% vs 1.7%, P = .048). Likewise, in patients with lumbar spondylosis or fusion, there were less dislocations in the anterior approach group (1.0% vs 3.8%, P = .004). Using logistic regression, there was a 4.1× increased risk of dislocation with a posterior approach vs an anterior approach in the spondylosis or fusion group (P = .011).

CONCLUSION

Patients with lumbar spondylosis or fusion have high rates of instability. At our institution, we found that utilization of an anterior surgical approach substantially mitigated this risk.

[Battle: Indication for surgery in hip-spine syndrome-Hip or spine first? : The spine surgeon's view]

Pathologies of the hip, spine and the lower extremity are often concomitant due to their three-dimensional anatomic and physiological interrelation. The real challenge lies in defining which of the pathologies is most relevant for the patient in terms of clinical symptoms and which organ should be treated first. The purpose of this review article is two-fold: Firstly, to explain the treatment dilemma of hip-spine syndrome to the treating physician. Secondly, to highlight the significance of spinal pathology in this context.

Outcomes following primary total hip arthroplasty with pre-existing spinal fusion surgery

Aims

There is inconsistent evidence on whether prior spinal fusion surgery adversely impacts outcomes following total hip arthroplasty (THA). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the association between pre-existing spinal fusion surgery and the rate of complications following primary THA.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to October 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing outcomes of dislocation, revision, or reasons for revision in patients following primary THA with or without pre-existing spinal fusion surgery. Furthermore, we compared short (two or less levels) or long (three or more levels) spinal fusions to no fusion. Summary measures of association were relative risks (RRs) (with 95% confidence intervals (CIs)).

Results

We identified ten articles corresponding to nine unique observational studies comprising of 1,992,366 primary THAs. No RCTs were identified. There were 32,945 cases of spinal fusion and 1,752,362 non-cases. Comparing prior spinal fusion versus no spinal fusion in primary THA, RRs (95% CI) for dislocation was 2.23 (1.81 to 2.74; seven studies), revision 2.14 (1.63 to 2.83; five studies), periprosthetic joint infection 1.71 (1.53 to 1.92; four studies), periprosthetic fracture 1.52 (1.28 to 1.81; three studies), aseptic loosening 1.76 (1.54 to 2.01; three studies), and any complications 2.82 (1.37 to 5.80; three studies) were identified. Both short and long spinal fusions, when compared with no fusion, were associated dislocation, revision, or reasons for revision.

Conclusions

Patients with prior spinal fusion are at risk of adverse events following primary THA. Measures that reduce the risk of these complications should be considered in this high-risk population when undergoing primary THA. These patients should also be counselled appropriately around their risks of undergoing THA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(6):664–670.